Hubungan Gaya Kepimpinan dengan Kepuasan Kerja: Kajian Kes di Hotel Oliver, Danok, Thailand
This study aims to look at the leadership style of supervisors and job satisfaction in the district Danok, Thailand. This study specifically to identify the leadership style of supervisors based on the views of workers' job satisfaction. This study used a survey method and data obtained from qu...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | eng |
| Published: |
2011
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://etd.uum.edu.my/3741/1/s804028.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| id |
my-uum-etd.3741 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
uketd_dc |
| institution |
Universiti Utara Malaysia |
| collection |
UUM ETD |
| language |
eng |
| advisor |
Yusof, Norhafezah |
| topic |
HD28-70 Management Industrial Management |
| spellingShingle |
HD28-70 Management Industrial Management Afnan, Cheda Oh Hubungan Gaya Kepimpinan dengan Kepuasan Kerja: Kajian Kes di Hotel Oliver, Danok, Thailand |
| description |
This study aims to look at the leadership style of supervisors and job satisfaction in the district Danok, Thailand. This study specifically to identify the leadership style of supervisors based on the views of workers' job satisfaction. This study used a survey method and data obtained from questionnaires using a five point Likert scale. Measuring instrument "Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire" (LBDQ) was used to measure the structural dimensions of leadership style of supervisors and the dimensions of the consideration. Measuring instrument used to measure job satisfaction levels of job satisfaction on the leadership style of supervisors of two dimensions. The sample consisted of 37 workers from the Hotel Oliver, Danok, Thailand. Samples were chosen randomly. Data processing involves the measurement of the frequency of descriptive statistics, mean, standard deviation and percentage. Based on available research the leadership style of supervisors in the two dimensions of structure and consideration dimensions are low in the eyes of employees. Most items in both dimensions are less than 3.00 min. This indicates that the supervisor at the hotel Oliver studied about the leadership style of the two dimensions of the force that resulted in a moderate level of job satisfaction. |
| format |
Thesis |
| qualification_name |
masters |
| qualification_level |
Master's degree |
| author |
Afnan, Cheda Oh |
| author_facet |
Afnan, Cheda Oh |
| author_sort |
Afnan, Cheda Oh |
| title |
Hubungan Gaya Kepimpinan dengan Kepuasan Kerja: Kajian Kes di Hotel Oliver, Danok, Thailand |
| title_short |
Hubungan Gaya Kepimpinan dengan Kepuasan Kerja: Kajian Kes di Hotel Oliver, Danok, Thailand |
| title_full |
Hubungan Gaya Kepimpinan dengan Kepuasan Kerja: Kajian Kes di Hotel Oliver, Danok, Thailand |
| title_fullStr |
Hubungan Gaya Kepimpinan dengan Kepuasan Kerja: Kajian Kes di Hotel Oliver, Danok, Thailand |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Hubungan Gaya Kepimpinan dengan Kepuasan Kerja: Kajian Kes di Hotel Oliver, Danok, Thailand |
| title_sort |
hubungan gaya kepimpinan dengan kepuasan kerja: kajian kes di hotel oliver, danok, thailand |
| granting_institution |
Universiti Utara Malaysia |
| granting_department |
College of Arts and Sciences (CAS) |
| publishDate |
2011 |
| url |
https://etd.uum.edu.my/3741/1/s804028.pdf |
| _version_ |
1747827637977350144 |
| spelling |
my-uum-etd.37412022-04-11T01:01:28Z Hubungan Gaya Kepimpinan dengan Kepuasan Kerja: Kajian Kes di Hotel Oliver, Danok, Thailand 2011 Afnan, Cheda Oh Yusof, Norhafezah College of Arts and Sciences (CAS) College of Arts and Sciences HD28-70 Management. Industrial Management This study aims to look at the leadership style of supervisors and job satisfaction in the district Danok, Thailand. This study specifically to identify the leadership style of supervisors based on the views of workers' job satisfaction. This study used a survey method and data obtained from questionnaires using a five point Likert scale. Measuring instrument "Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire" (LBDQ) was used to measure the structural dimensions of leadership style of supervisors and the dimensions of the consideration. Measuring instrument used to measure job satisfaction levels of job satisfaction on the leadership style of supervisors of two dimensions. The sample consisted of 37 workers from the Hotel Oliver, Danok, Thailand. Samples were chosen randomly. Data processing involves the measurement of the frequency of descriptive statistics, mean, standard deviation and percentage. Based on available research the leadership style of supervisors in the two dimensions of structure and consideration dimensions are low in the eyes of employees. Most items in both dimensions are less than 3.00 min. This indicates that the supervisor at the hotel Oliver studied about the leadership style of the two dimensions of the force that resulted in a moderate level of job satisfaction. 2011 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/3741/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/3741/1/s804028.pdf text eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Adam, J.S. (1965). Inequity In Social Exchanges. Advances In ExperimentalSocial Psychology. New York: Academic Press. Ainon Mohd (2005). Teori dan Teknik Kepimpinan: Panduan Aplikasi di TempatKerja. Pahang: PTS Professional. Andersen, J. A. 2002. “What we know about leadership and effectiveness?”,Paper presented at The First International Workshop on LeadershipResearch, European Institute of Advance Studies in Management (EIASM), Oxford, 16-17 December. Avolio, B. J. dan B. M. Bass. 1988. Transformational and Leadership, Charisma, and Beyond. Emerging LeadershipVistas . J.G. Hunt et al. (eds)., Lexington, MA: Lexington Books. Barnard, G. (1938). The function of executive. Cambridge: Harvard University. Campbell, J. P., Dunnette, M. D., Lawler, E. E., & Weick, K. E. (1970). Managerial behavior, performance, and effectiveness. New York: McGraw Hill. Caplan, R. D and French R. P (1978). Organizational Stress and Individual Strain. New York: J. Marrowi.. Chong Ting Ngoh (2002). Hubungan Gaya Kepimpinart Terhadap Kepuasan Pekerja dalam Aspek Penyeliaan dun Komitmen Pekerja. Latihan Ilmiah. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Davis, K. (1981). Human Behavior at Work, Organization Behavior, 6 th Edition: Mcgraw Hill. DeCottis, T.A., & Summers, T.P.(1987). A Path Analysis of a Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Organizational Commitment. Human Relations, 40:168-175. Feldman, D. C. (1999).The handbook of emotional intelligent leadership. Fall Church, VA: Leadership Performance Solutions. Forehand, G., & B. Gilmer. (1964). Environmental variation in studies of organizational behavior, Psychological Bulletin, 62(10), 361-382. Galloway, D.K., Boswell, F., Panckhurst, C., & K.Green (1984). Sources of Satisfaction for New Zealand Primary School Teachers. Educational Research, 27(1): 44-51 Graen, G.B., Novak, M.A., & Sommerkamp, P. (1982). The effects of leadermember exchange and job design on productivity and satisfaction: Testing a dual attachment model. Organizational Behavior and HumanPerformance, 30, 109-131. Hackman, J.R. & Suttle, J.L (1997). Improving Life at Works: Behavioral Science Approach to Organizational Change. California: Goodyear Publishing Company. Jaafar Muhammad (200). Kelakuan Organisasi. Kuala Lumpur. Leeds Publication. Jaafar Muhammad, Mohd Hizam, H dan Zafir, M. (2000). Pengantar Pengurusan. Kuala Lumpur: Vinlin Press Sdn Bhd. Jones, M. D. (2006). Which is a better predictor of job performance: Job satisfaction or life satisfaction? Journal of Behavioral and AppliedManagement, 8, 20-42. Kaczka, E.& Kirk, R.(1967). Managerial Climate, Work Groups and Organizational Performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12(17), 253-272. Katz D & Kahn R L. The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley, 1966. 489 p. Kamus Dewan. (2000). Edisi ketiga. Kuala Lumpur. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Litwin, G. H., & Stringer, R. A. (1968). Motivation and organizational climate. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press. Litwin, G.H & Stringer, R.A. (1968).Motivation and Organization Climate, Cambdrige, MA: Harvard Business School, Division of Research. Lussier, R.N. (2002).Human Relation In Organization, Applications and Skill Building (5th Edition): McGraw Hill: New York. Lengel, R.H. & Daft, R.L. (1988). The Selection of Communication Media as an Executive Skill. Academy of Management Executive, 2(3), 225-232. Mahathir Mohamad (1982). Ucapan penting, Jabatan Penerangan Malaysia. Mohd Najib Abd Ghafar. (1999). Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Skudai, Johor. Penerbit Universiti Mohd Najib Abdul Ghafar (2003). “Reka Bentuk Tinjauan Soal Selidik Pendidikan”. Johor: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Mottaz, C. (1985). The Relative Importance of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Rewards as Determinants of Work Satisfaction, The Sociological Quarterly, 26: 365 -385. Mowday, R.T., Porter, L.M., and Steers, R.M.(1982). Employee-OrganizationLinkages: The Psychology of Commitment, Absenteeism, and Turnover. New York Academic Press. Mowday, R.T., Porter, L.W., & Steers, R.M., (1982). The Measurement of Organizational Commitment. Journal of Vocational Behaviour. 14: 224-247. Muhamad Rifa’I (2008). Kumpulan Abstrak Tesis & Disertasi 2008/2009. Hubungan Antara Gaya Kepemimpinan, Budaya Organisasi, Motivasi Berprestasi, Dan Komitmen Pada Organisasi, Dengan Kinerja Dosen Pada Universitas Dalam Pesantren Di Jawa Timur Nail, A.H.K. Awamleh.(1996). Organizational Commitment of Civil Service Managers In Jordan: A Field Study. Journal of Management Development. 15. Norhartini (2004). Hubungan Kepuasan Kerja dan Komitmen Organisasi: Kajian kes di jabatan pelajaran negeri kedah. Tesis Sarjana tidak diterbitkan Universiti Utara Malaysia. Ong Gua Pak (2007). The Effect Of Organizational Learning On Organizational Commitment, Job Satisfaction AndWork Performanc. Universiti Putra Malaysia. Pool, S. W. (1997). The relationship of job satisfaction with substitutes of leadership, leadership behavior, and work motivation. Journal ofPsychology, 131, 271-283. Powell, G. (1990). One More Time: Do Female and Male Managers Differ? Academy of Management Executive, 4(3): 68- 74. Razali Mat Zin (1996). Kepimpinan Dalam Pengurusan. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications & Distributors Sdn. Bhd. Robbins, S. (2000). Gelagat Organisasi. Penterjemah Abdul Razak Ibrahim dan Ainin Sulaiman. Prentice Hall. Robbins, S.P. & M. Coulter (1996). Management (Fifth Edition). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc. Sekaran, U. (2005). Research Method For Business: A Skill Building Approach.Singapore: John Wiley & Son (Asia) Pte. Ltd. Shafiq, A.Alvi, Syed W. Ahmed (1987). Accessing Organizational Commitment In A Developing Country: Pakistan. A Case Study. Human Relations, 40: 267-280. Stogdill, R.M. (1974). Handbook of leadership. A survey of the literature. Journal of Psychology, 25, 35-1. Schuster, J. P. 1994. Transforming Your Leadership Style. Leadership. Thau, S., Bennett, R. J., Mitchell, M. S. & Marrs, M. B. (2009). How management style moderates the relationship between abusive supervision and workplace deviance: An uncertainty management theory perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process. 108. 79-92. Vroom, V.H. (1964). Work and Motivation. New York: Wiley. Wan Faridah Akmal, Noor Azmi dan Ishak (2002). Kepimpinan TransaksilTrasformasi dan Ciri Kerja Profesional Teknologi Maklumat Sektor Awam Malaysia, Jurnal TeknuZugi, UTM ttp:// www.penerbit.utm.my~umal/37sirie.5h tm dilayar pada 10/04/2004 Zafir Mohamed Makhbul. (2002). Sistem Maklumat Sumber Manusia dan Pelaksanaannya ke Arah Organisasi Berdaya Saing. Isu Pengurusan, 1,1-11. Zelco, H. dan Dance, F. (1965). Business and professional speech communication. New York : Holt, Rinehart & Winston. |