Pengaruh Faktor Diri, Keluarga dan Persekitaran Sosial Terhadap Residivisme di Penjara

Recidivism in prison were oftenly debated since it gives an impact on congestion problem, an amendment of the law, prison regulations, the rising cost of security management, retention and treatment, and rehabilitation program implementation problems. Recovery efficiency problems occur because not a...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Ibrahim, Samad
Format:	Thesis
Language:	eng eng
Published:	2013
Subjects:	HV Social Pathology Social and Public Welfare
Online Access:	https://etd.uum.edu.my/3860/1/s804747.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/3860/7/s804747.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-uum-etd.3860
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection	UUM ETD
language	eng eng
advisor	Mustafa, Jamaludin Ab. Hamid, Kamal
topic	HV Social Pathology Social and Public Welfare
spellingShingle	HV Social Pathology Social and Public Welfare Ibrahim, Samad Pengaruh Faktor Diri, Keluarga dan Persekitaran Sosial Terhadap Residivisme di Penjara
description	Recidivism in prison were oftenly debated since it gives an impact on congestion problem, an amendment of the law, prison regulations, the rising cost of security management, retention and treatment, and rehabilitation program implementation problems. Recovery efficiency problems occur because not all residivis can complete the phases of the rehabilitation program prescribed due to the diversity of time sentences. Reinstatement period of residivist that returned back to jail after released also increased. The objective of this research is to examine the factors that influence the occurrence of the recidivism problem in Malaysia, especially in Taiping Prison. This research uses quantitative methods with qualitative methods helped. Interview with the respondent and the Taiping Prison staff conducted. Qualitative information is used in order to support the quantitative data in research. Research instrument used was a questionnaire. A total of 230 respondents residivis from Taiping Prison was randomly selected as a sample based on three types of offenses of cases of violent crime, property crime offenses, and drug offenses. The questionnaire has six parts and 76 questions regarding demographics, involvement in crime and punishment, residivis perception of recovery programs, family and community factors, social environmental factors, and individual residivis. Data measurements made using a Likert Scale. Data analysis was conducted using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences or SPSS version 16.0. The correlation between independent variables and bound variables are used to see the factors that influence the occurrence of problems and related causes Recidivism. Methods of data analysis used descriptive and inferential reason for the correlation and Recidivism. Description of the frequency, the frequency correlation prison sentence residivis perception of Human Development Plan (HDP), relationships with family and community, self-residivis factors and the social environment. Description is also related to the mean, correlation or difference, frequency and duration of prison sentence reinstatement residivis to jail and the following phases of the recovery program. The findings of the research found 82% of respondents agreed, and positive perceptions of the implementation of the program (HDP). 66% agreed that the factors themselves residivis become the leading cause of Recidivism. Research findings also showed that 41% agreed social environmental factors cause a relatively strong influence recidivism problems, and 37% do not agree that the influence of family and community causes Recidivism. This means that relationships with family residivis still needed though interaction to discuss personal problems are considerably reduced. Hence, a recommendation is presented to enhance the effectiveness of rehabilitation programs and action to encounter the problems of recidivism in prison.
format	Thesis
qualification_name	masters
qualification_level	Master's degree
author	Ibrahim, Samad
author_facet	Ibrahim, Samad
author_sort	Ibrahim, Samad
title	Pengaruh Faktor Diri, Keluarga dan Persekitaran Sosial Terhadap Residivisme di Penjara
title_short	Pengaruh Faktor Diri, Keluarga dan Persekitaran Sosial Terhadap Residivisme di Penjara
title_full	Pengaruh Faktor Diri, Keluarga dan Persekitaran Sosial Terhadap Residivisme di Penjara
title_fullStr	Pengaruh Faktor Diri, Keluarga dan Persekitaran Sosial Terhadap Residivisme di Penjara
title_full_unstemmed	Pengaruh Faktor Diri, Keluarga dan Persekitaran Sosial Terhadap Residivisme di Penjara
title_sort	pengaruh faktor diri, keluarga dan persekitaran sosial terhadap residivisme di penjara
granting_institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department	Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts & Sciences
publishDate	2013
url	https://etd.uum.edu.my/3860/1/s804747.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/3860/7/s804747.pdf
_version_	1747827656113520640
spelling	my-uum-etd.38602022-04-10T02:52:05Z Pengaruh Faktor Diri, Keluarga dan Persekitaran Sosial Terhadap Residivisme di Penjara 2013 Ibrahim, Samad Mustafa, Jamaludin Ab. Hamid, Kamal Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts & Sciences Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts and Sciences HV Social Pathology. Social and Public Welfare Recidivism in prison were oftenly debated since it gives an impact on congestion problem, an amendment of the law, prison regulations, the rising cost of security management, retention and treatment, and rehabilitation program implementation problems. Recovery efficiency problems occur because not all residivis can complete the phases of the rehabilitation program prescribed due to the diversity of time sentences. Reinstatement period of residivist that returned back to jail after released also increased. The objective of this research is to examine the factors that influence the occurrence of the recidivism problem in Malaysia, especially in Taiping Prison. This research uses quantitative methods with qualitative methods helped. Interview with the respondent and the Taiping Prison staff conducted. Qualitative information is used in order to support the quantitative data in research. Research instrument used was a questionnaire. A total of 230 respondents residivis from Taiping Prison was randomly selected as a sample based on three types of offenses of cases of violent crime, property crime offenses, and drug offenses. The questionnaire has six parts and 76 questions regarding demographics, involvement in crime and punishment, residivis perception of recovery programs, family and community factors, social environmental factors, and individual residivis. Data measurements made using a Likert Scale. Data analysis was conducted using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences or SPSS version 16.0. The correlation between independent variables and bound variables are used to see the factors that influence the occurrence of problems and related causes Recidivism. Methods of data analysis used descriptive and inferential reason for the correlation and Recidivism. Description of the frequency, the frequency correlation prison sentence residivis perception of Human Development Plan (HDP), relationships with family and community, self-residivis factors and the social environment. Description is also related to the mean, correlation or difference, frequency and duration of prison sentence reinstatement residivis to jail and the following phases of the recovery program. The findings of the research found 82% of respondents agreed, and positive perceptions of the implementation of the program (HDP). 66% agreed that the factors themselves residivis become the leading cause of Recidivism. Research findings also showed that 41% agreed social environmental factors cause a relatively strong influence recidivism problems, and 37% do not agree that the influence of family and community causes Recidivism. This means that relationships with family residivis still needed though interaction to discuss personal problems are considerably reduced. Hence, a recommendation is presented to enhance the effectiveness of rehabilitation programs and action to encounter the problems of recidivism in prison. 2013 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/3860/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/3860/1/s804747.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/3860/7/s804747.pdf text eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Abdullah Al Hadi Muhamed, Rozumah, Maznah Baba & Safidah Abu Samah (1996). Kajian keberkesanan program pemulihan di penjara khas Seremban Fasa III/96/. Penjara Khas Seremban dengan Kerjasama Jabatan Pembangunan Keluarga, Fakulti Ekologi Manusia, Universiti Putra Malaysia. Abdullah Al Hadi & Iran Herman (1977). Penagih dadah mengikut kaum, diri, keluarga dan persekitaran. Kuala Lumpur: Agensi Dadah Kebangsaan Dengan Kerjasama UKM dan UPM. Abraham, K.M., & Teplin, L.A. (1990). Drug disorder, mental illness and violence, In M.D. L Rosa, E.Y. Lambert & B. Gropper (Eds). Drugs and Violence: Causes, correlates and consequences. NIDA Research Monograph 103, 221-237. Al Qur’an (1971). Al Qalam:4. Mujamma’ Al Malik Fard Li Thiba ‘At Al Mush Haf Asy Syarif Medinah Munawarah, Kerajaan Saudi Arabia. Al Qur’an, (2000) Tafsir Ar-Rahman, Surah Al-Israa, ayat 72. m.s .697 cetakan kesebelas, Jabatan Kemajuan Islam Malaysia (JAKIM). Akta Penjara (1995). Percetakan Nasional Berhad (PNB). Aziz Mohamad (2010). Laporan Statistik Parol 2010, Bahagian Parol, Ibu Pejabat Penjara Malaysia. Kajang. Bahaman Abu Samah & Rakan, (2004). Keberkesanan program pemulihan jabatan penjara malaysia. Serdang: Universiti Putra Malaysia. Baker, H.S. (1963). The Outsiders. New York: Free Press. Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., Martin, S. E. & Nagin, D. (1978). Deterrence and Incapacitation: Estimating the effects of criminal sanctions on criminal rates. Washington.DC: National Academy of Science. Buku Laporan Kesalahan Tatatertib BanduanTahun (2010). PenjaraTaiping, Perak. Buletin Penjara (2008, Jun). Bahagian Rawatan dan Pemulihan, Ibu Pejabat Penjara Malaysia. Cates,W.M. (1990). Panduan amalan untuk penyelidikan. Terjemahan Syaharom Abdullah. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Chen S. (2005). The transition from juvernile to adult criminal careers at New South Wales, Australia. Crime and Justice Bulletin. Atas Talian http://www.agd.nsw.gov. Christiansen, K. O. (1969). Recidivism among collaborators, crime and culture: Essey in honor of thorsten sellin (Ed.) Wolfgang, M.E. New York, 254-283. Chuah Mooi Kim (1990). Keyakinan diri penagih dadah: Hubungan dengan sokongan sosial dan faktor demografi. Tesis Sarjana. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Chaplin, J.D. (1985). Dictionary of psychology. New York: Dell Publishing Company, (Edisi Kedua). Chein, I.(1984). Theories psychosocial and epidemological factors. In W. Pollin, M. Snyder. R. C. Petersen & E.W. Waldrop (Eds). Theories on drug abuse. selected contemporary perspectives. Washington DC: NIDA Research Monograph Series. Clemmer D. (1940). The prison community. (Reissued 1958. New York. Holt, Rinehart & Winston). Cited in: Bondesonn, U.V. (1990) Criminal Carrers in Correction. International Annals of Criminology. 28(1-2): pp.135-150. Cristiansen, K. O. (1969). Recidivism among collabrators, dalam crime and culture: Essey in honor of thorsten sellin (Ed) Wolfgang, M.E. New York, 254-283. Darussalam Budin (2007). Pengarah Pemulihan dan Rawatan, Jabatan Penjara Malaysia;JP/PML/Pv/154/4 Klt 2.(49) 29 Oktober 2007. Daley, D.C. (1987), Relapse prevention with substance abuser: Clinical issues and myths. Social Work, 45(2),38-42. Danial, G. (1964). The effectiveness of a prison and parol system. Indianapolis: Bobbs - Merrill. David, E. K. & Daniel, Y. L. (2009). ‘Measuring and analysing juvenile recidivism in rural and urban Pennsylvania. ‘Department of Economics Shippensburg Uni. Of Pennsylvania. Drabsch, T. (2006). Reducing the risk of recidivism. Sydney: NSW Parliamentary Library Research Service. Edwin, H. S & Donald, C. (1978). Criminology. Uni. Of Califonia J. B. Lippincott company. England, R. W. J. (1965). Ideologies and correction. Prison Journal. 45 (Autumn/Winter) p. 17-22. Erickson, K.T. (1964). Notes on the sociology of deviance. In the other side: Perspective on deviance (Ed) Becker , H.S. 9-12, New York: Free Press. Ezani Yaakub, Mohd Takiyuddin & Kamariah Yusoff (2005). Latar belakang pendidikan agama banduan jatuh hukum di penjara Kajang, Taiping dan Marang. Shah Alam: Universiti Teknologi Mara. Fauziah Ibrahim, Bahaman Abu Samah, Mansor Abu Talib & Mohamad Satar Sabran (2008). Faktor menyumbang kepada penagihan relaps dalam kalangan penagih dadah PUSPEN di Semenanjung Malaysia. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Fong Kin & Navaratnam,V. (1987). Assesement of drug depended in malaysia, an update analysis 1983 and 1986. Monograph Series No. 6. Pulau Pinang: Universiti Sains Malaysia. Francis, T. & Karen, E. G. (1982). Reaffirming rehabilitation. Ohio: Cincinati. Gendreau, P., Goggin, C. & Cullen, F. T. (1999). The effects of prison sentences on recidivism. Department of Criminal Justice: Universiti of Cincinnati. Glaser, G (1966).The effectivnessof the prison and parol system. Hadi Zakaria (1998). Residivism di Institusi Penjara Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Yayasan Pencegah Jenayah Malaysia. Hamzani Che Ibrahim (2010). Mengurang kadar residivism di Institusi Penjara Malaysia, Kertas Kerja 1, Mesyuarat Ketua-Ketua Institusi Penjara Malaysia di Akedami Koreksional, Langkawi. Harold, S. F. (1948). Adult criminal offence trends following juvenile distinguency. Jurnal of Criminal and Criminology and Police Science, 49, 129. Hawkin, J. D. & Fraser, M. W. (1987). The social networks of drug abusers before and after treatment. International Journal of Addictions, 2 (4), 343-355. Imam Al Ghazali (1993). Ihya Ulumuddin, Dar Al Khari, Cetakan Kedua. Jones, C. (2006). Risk of reoffending amongs parolees. Crime and Justice Bulletin, no. 91. Kanun Prosidur Jenayah (1997). Bab 6, Jadual di bawah Kanun Kesiksaan, (N.M.B.) International Law Book, p.170 – 190. Kemasukkan Banduan Sabitan (2010). Penjara Taiping, Perak. Kenneth D. B., terjemahan Hashim Awang (1984). Kaedah penyelidikan sosial, Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, Kuala Lumpur, p.635. Krejcie & Morgan (1970). Reserch methods for business – a skill building approach. L. Sechrest,S.O. White., E.D. Brown (1979). The rehabilitation of criminal offenders: Problem and prospect. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences. Lailly., Cullen., & Ball (2007). Causes of recidivism. Atas talian www.lot sofessey.com. Larry J. Siegal, Criminologi, Tenth Edition, University of Massachusetts, Lowel. Lise, M. K. & Charles R. (2004). Current strategies for reducing recidivism. Center for Impact Research (CIR), Chicago: Illinois. Maklumbalas Pelaksanaan Pelan Pembangunan Insan (2007). JP/PML/KP/19/28 Klt.2 (80) bth. 2.April 2007. Martha Lyman (2006). WEdD., “Whys and hows” of measuring jail recidivism. Director of Research Hampden Country Sheriff’s Deparment – Urban Institute. Maslow, A. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper. Michael, D. M. (2001). Recidivism. Department of Criminal Justice and Dpmt. of Information Decision Science Univ. of Illinois at Chicago. Miller, M. W. (1992). The effectivness of treatment for substance abuse: Reasons for optimism. Journal of subatance Abuse,p.9, 93-102. Modul Program Residivis (2010). Penjara Malaysia, Bahagian Pemulihan dan Rawatan Ibu Pejabat Penjara Malaysia. Mohd Zawawi Ab Rahim (2010). Meningkatkan Orang di Parol, Kertas Kerja 3, Mesyuarat Ketua-KetuaInstitusi Penjara Malaysia di Akedami Koreksional Langkawi. Mohd Afezan Md Ghani (2011). Persepsi banduan terhadap program pembangunan sahsiah di penjara. Skudai: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Navaratnam,V., Fong Kin & Kulalmoli S. (1992). An evalution study of drug treatment and rehabilitation program at a drug treatment centre. Monograph series 7, Universiti Sains Malaysia: Centre Drug Research. Nur Hayati Muhamed (1995). Kolokium Yayasan Mencegah Jenayah Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur. Noor Azniza Ishak (2010). Penjara: Hukuman atau Koreksional. Utusan Malaysia. p.6 . Patricia, S. & Robert, L.S. (2005). Substannce abuse counseling: Theory and practice (3 rd Edition). New Jersey: Pearson Merill Prentice Hall. Paul, G. & Claire, G. (1999). The effects of prison sentences on recidivism. University of New Brunswick: Centre for Criminal Justice Studies. Pekeliling Pengkategorian Banduan Residivis (2008). JP/PML/Pv/154/4 Klt 3 (4). Tarikh 27 Jun 2008. Pekeliling Pelaksanan Fungsi Pemulihan dan Rawatan Seluruh Institusi Penjara Malaysia. 92007). JP/PML/Pv/154/4 Klt.2 (49). Tarikh 29 Oktober 2007. Prison Rehabilitation. Atas talian www.politik.co.uk. Pelan Pembangunan Insan (2010). Fasa Orientasi, Program Residivis Penjara Taiping,Perak, Bhg. Pemulihan IPPM, Kajang. Pengwartaan Kerajaan P.U. (A) 77 hal. 202 . KDN.S.32/27 : ) 163. ‘syarat-syarat naik peringkat’ 20 Februari 1984. Peraturan-Peraturan Penjara (2000). Seksyen 3(1)(c), dan Seksyen 122 – 125 PNB. Persidangan APCCA 19th di Shanghai (1999). Agenda item three, ‘reducing recidivism’ (24.10. 1999). Plan Strategik Jabatan Penjara Malaysia,(2009). Ibu Pejabat Penjara Malaysia, Program Pemulihan (2007). Bahagian Pemulihan Ibu Pejabat Penjara Malaysia. Reisig, Bales., Hay & Wang (2007). di Amerika Syarikat. Atas talian www.lot sofessey.com. Rujukan BahagianPemulihan(20080. (dlm surat; JP/PML/Pv/154/(87) bth.13.1.2004) ( dlm surat; JP/PML/Pv/154/4 Klt 3. (4) bth. 23.6.2008. Rehabilitation (penology). Atas talian www. wikipedia.org/wiki/Rehabilita- tion (penology). Sanusi, D. L. (2009). ‘Correctional education reduces recidivism’, New York Amsterdam News; 2/19/2009 vol.100 Issue 8, 3-34, 2. Selwyn Raah, (1994). U. S. Study Finds Recidivism of Convicts Lower Then Expected. N.York Time 26 ; 71 Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behaviour. New York: Mc Millan. Somphog Rujjanavet (2005), Country Report – Thailand, ‘Current situation and problem in regard to the treatment of offenders’. Atas talian www/unafei.or.jp/ Statistik Kemasukkan Pesalah Residivis (2009). Bahagia Pemulihan, Ibu Pejabat Penjara Malaysia. Sabitha Marican (2006). Penyelidikan sains sosial, pendekatan prakmatik. Selangor: Edusystem Sdn Bhd. Steven, B. (1987). (terjemahan Cheu Hock Tong), Devians, realiiti dan masyarakat, Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. The Audit Office of NSW 2006 The Auditor Generals’ Report To Parliament 2006 Vol 4:83. Todd, R. C. (1986). American correction, Rutgert University. Tuckman, B. W. (1988). Conducting educational research (3rd. ed). New York: Harcount Brace Jovanovich. Unit Statistik Penjara Taiping, Perak, Jun, 2010 Unit Urusetia, Sejarah Penjara Taiping, Penjara Taiping, Perak. Atas talian www.prison.gov.my. United Nations Standard Minimum Rules (1977). for the treatment of prisoners and related recommendations. (UNSMR). Uma Sekaran (1970). Reserch methods for business - A skill building approach. Fourth Edition. p. 294. Walker, N. (1987). The unwanted effects of long-term imprisonment. In: Problems of long-term imprisonment. Bottoms, A.E. & Roy Light (eds) Gower, Aldershot, P 194 -196. Watts & Wright (1990). Drug and violence: Couses, correlated and consequences. Nasional Institute on Drug Abuse, Research. Monograph Series. Wan Ibrahim Wan Ahmad. (2009). Bengkel Penyelidikan Siswazah Kerja Sosial, Universiti Utara Malaysia. Wolfgang, M. E. Figlio, R. M. & Sellin, T. (1972). Delequency in a birth cohort. Chicago: Chicago University Press. Yahaya Don & Mahmood Nazar Mohamed (2002). Penagihan dadah dan perlakuan jenayah: Pengaruh faktor psikososial dan institusi. Jurnal Psikologi Malaysia, Bil. 16. Rujukan Akhbar 1. Berita Mingguan - 27.5 2008 2. Berita Harian - 13.7. 2009 3. Utusan Malaysia - 22.3.2010, 8.7.2010, 29.12.2010

Pengaruh Faktor Diri, Keluarga dan Persekitaran Sosial Terhadap Residivisme di Penjara

Similar Items