Perbezaan Hasil Kerja Kursus Amali di Kalangan Pelajar Rendah Pencapaian dan Pelajar Tinggi, Pencapaian Terhadap Matapelajaran Kemahiran Hidup Bersepadu Sekolah Menengah

Perbezaan Hasil Kerja Kursus Amali di Kalangan Pelajar Rendah Pencapaian dan Pelajar Tinggi, Pencapaian Terhadap Matapelajaran Kemahiran Hidup Bersepadu Sekolah Menengah

The objective of this research is to identify the source of differences between students’ practical coursework among the less able and more able students towards Living Skill practice. The participants of this qualitative study is consist of 6 students from 2 Jujur who is from the more able class an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Noorhasni, Hasan
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
Published: 2011
Subjects:
LB1603 Secondary Education
High schools
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/4002/1/s800588.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4002/7/s800588.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.4002
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
advisor Abd Rahim, Fauziah
topic LB1603 Secondary Education
High schools
spellingShingle LB1603 Secondary Education
High schools
Noorhasni, Hasan
Perbezaan Hasil Kerja Kursus Amali di Kalangan Pelajar Rendah Pencapaian dan Pelajar Tinggi, Pencapaian Terhadap Matapelajaran Kemahiran Hidup Bersepadu Sekolah Menengah
description The objective of this research is to identify the source of differences between students’ practical coursework among the less able and more able students towards Living Skill practice. The participants of this qualitative study is consist of 6 students from 2 Jujur who is from the more able class and 5 students from 2 Dedikasi which is a class of less able students and also teachers at a secondary school in Perlis. Data from this study include interviews and observation towards the practical process being carried out by the students and also teachers who teach those classes. All those chosen samples are involved with the Living Skill Learning component such as needlework practice and carpentry. The finding reveals that the less able students could produce better results in their practical coursework compared to the more able students. This factor is due to the less able students being really interested in the practical coursework compared to the theory classes. The excellent students are lacking of motivation in doing practical coursework as they feel that the course will consume a lot of times thus, it wastes their time if compared with the ordinary lesson in classroom. However, the findings also show that, there are some less able students who produce very poor results in their practical coursework as they are not interested and lack motivation. The research findings also prove that not all more able students produce unsatisfactory results for this coursework as there are some of them who could produce excellent result due to their interest and they do have intrinsic motivation to the particular subject, to get the best result in their PMR examination. They also fell that there is relevance of this field with their interest and future career. Hence teachers need to help students to become interested in Living skill and students need to maintain their interest in the field as they further their studies in the future.
format Thesis
qualification_name masters
qualification_level Master's degree
author Noorhasni, Hasan
author_facet Noorhasni, Hasan
author_sort Noorhasni, Hasan
title Perbezaan Hasil Kerja Kursus Amali di Kalangan Pelajar Rendah Pencapaian dan Pelajar Tinggi, Pencapaian Terhadap Matapelajaran Kemahiran Hidup Bersepadu Sekolah Menengah
title_short Perbezaan Hasil Kerja Kursus Amali di Kalangan Pelajar Rendah Pencapaian dan Pelajar Tinggi, Pencapaian Terhadap Matapelajaran Kemahiran Hidup Bersepadu Sekolah Menengah
title_full Perbezaan Hasil Kerja Kursus Amali di Kalangan Pelajar Rendah Pencapaian dan Pelajar Tinggi, Pencapaian Terhadap Matapelajaran Kemahiran Hidup Bersepadu Sekolah Menengah
title_fullStr Perbezaan Hasil Kerja Kursus Amali di Kalangan Pelajar Rendah Pencapaian dan Pelajar Tinggi, Pencapaian Terhadap Matapelajaran Kemahiran Hidup Bersepadu Sekolah Menengah
title_full_unstemmed Perbezaan Hasil Kerja Kursus Amali di Kalangan Pelajar Rendah Pencapaian dan Pelajar Tinggi, Pencapaian Terhadap Matapelajaran Kemahiran Hidup Bersepadu Sekolah Menengah
title_sort perbezaan hasil kerja kursus amali di kalangan pelajar rendah pencapaian dan pelajar tinggi, pencapaian terhadap matapelajaran kemahiran hidup bersepadu sekolah menengah
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department College of Arts and Sciences (CAS)
publishDate 2011
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/4002/1/s800588.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4002/7/s800588.pdf
_version_ 1747827663803777024
spelling my-uum-etd.40022014-07-14T05:04:16Z Perbezaan Hasil Kerja Kursus Amali di Kalangan Pelajar Rendah Pencapaian dan Pelajar Tinggi, Pencapaian Terhadap Matapelajaran Kemahiran Hidup Bersepadu Sekolah Menengah 2011 Noorhasni, Hasan Abd Rahim, Fauziah College of Arts and Sciences (CAS) College of Arts and Sciences LB1603 Secondary Education. High schools The objective of this research is to identify the source of differences between students’ practical coursework among the less able and more able students towards Living Skill practice. The participants of this qualitative study is consist of 6 students from 2 Jujur who is from the more able class and 5 students from 2 Dedikasi which is a class of less able students and also teachers at a secondary school in Perlis. Data from this study include interviews and observation towards the practical process being carried out by the students and also teachers who teach those classes. All those chosen samples are involved with the Living Skill Learning component such as needlework practice and carpentry. The finding reveals that the less able students could produce better results in their practical coursework compared to the more able students. This factor is due to the less able students being really interested in the practical coursework compared to the theory classes. The excellent students are lacking of motivation in doing practical coursework as they feel that the course will consume a lot of times thus, it wastes their time if compared with the ordinary lesson in classroom. However, the findings also show that, there are some less able students who produce very poor results in their practical coursework as they are not interested and lack motivation. The research findings also prove that not all more able students produce unsatisfactory results for this coursework as there are some of them who could produce excellent result due to their interest and they do have intrinsic motivation to the particular subject, to get the best result in their PMR examination. They also fell that there is relevance of this field with their interest and future career. Hence teachers need to help students to become interested in Living skill and students need to maintain their interest in the field as they further their studies in the future. 2011 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/4002/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/4002/1/s800588.pdf text eng validuser https://etd.uum.edu.my/4002/7/s800588.pdf text eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia American Psychological Association (1985), Standards for Education and Psychological Testing. Washington D.C.,: APA. Atan Long (1984). “Psikologi Pendidikan” Kuala Lumpur; Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Asmah Binti Osman (2004). “Faktor-Faktor Pengaplikasian Kemahiran Elektif Ert Oleh Pelajar Tingkatan Empat Dalam Kehidupan Seharian Di Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Perempuan Pudu Dan Sekolah Menengah Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Satu Tinjauan.” Universiti Teknologi Malaysia : Tesis Sarjana Muda. Ee Ah Meng (1993). Pedagogi. Kuala Lumpur: Fajar Bakti Sdn. Bhd. Faizah Bt Aboo Bakar (2006). “Persepsi Pelajar Tingkatan Empat, Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Dato’ Abdul Rahman Yasin, Tampoi, Johor Mengenai Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Mereka Dalam Mengaplikasikan Pengetahuan Mata Pelajaran Kemahiran Hidup (Teras) Di Dalam Kehidupan Seharian.” Universiti Teknologi Malaysia: Tesis Sarjana Muda. Hanis Hazwani Bt Mohd Isha (2006). “Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Aplikasi Mata Pelajaran Kemahiran Hidup (Ert) Dalam Kehidupan Seharian Pelajar Sekolah-Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Daerah Kerian, Perak.” Universiti Teknologi Malaysia : Tesis Sarjana Muda. Mohd Majid Konting (1994). “Kaedah penyelidikan Pendidikan”. Kuala Lumpur Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum (2002). Huraian Sukatan Pelajaran Kemahiran Hidup Bersepadu. Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia Roshidah Binti Mat Rashid (2001). “Aplikasi Kompenen Ekonomi Rumah Tangga (ERT) Dan Kemahiran Manipulatif Tambahan (KMT) Dalam Kehidupan Seharian Di KalanganPelajar Sekolah Menengah.” Universiti Teknologi Malaysia : Tesis Sarjana Muda. Jean McNiff, Pamela Lomax and Jack Whitehead(1996)” You and Your Action Research Project” Second Edition London RoutledgerFalmer Kamus Dewan Edisi Baru(2003) Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia: Kuala Lumpur. Laine, M.D., (2000), Fieldwork, Participation and Practice : Ethics and Dilemmas in Qualitative Research. London : Thousand Oaks, California : Sage. Lyman, H.B., (1986), Test Scores and What They Mean. Fourth Edition, New Jersey : Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs. Mak Lau Fong (1981), Evaluating Validity and Reliability of Selected Qualitative Research Methods. Singapore : National University of Singapore. Crow dan Crow(1980).Psikologi Pendidikan untuk Perguruan.Fajar Bakti: Kuala Lumpur. Gilbert Highet(1981), Seni Mengajar. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka: Kuala Lumpur. Kamus Dewan Edisi Baru (2003). Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia: Kuala Lumpur. Mohd Daud Hamzah (1990). Dorongan dan Pembelajaran.Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka: Kuala Lumpur. T. Subahan Mohd .Meerah, Rohaty Mohd.Majzab, Ahmad Jaffni Hassan(1994). Pembangunan Sumber Manusia.Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia: Bangi. Saeda. Sharifah Alawiah Alsagoff (1993 Psikologi Pendidikan II Psikologi Pembelajaran dan Kognitif, Bimbingan dan Kaunseling. Kuala Lumpur: Heinemann Educational Books Asia. Widad bt Othman dan Syed Hadzir Jamalululaill (1996).Kemampuan Pelajar Dalam Mengaplikasikan Kemahiran Hidup Dalam Kehidupannya.” Jurnal pendidikan Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Jilid 2, Bil 1 (46-58). Yahya Emat (1993). “ Pendidikan Teknik dan Vokasional” Kuala Lumpur : IBS Buku Sdn. Bhd. Zulhisam Bin Zakaria (2007). “ Aplikasi Kemahiran Subjek Kemahiran Hidup Di Kalangan Pelajar-Pelajar Tingkatan Empat Di Dua Buah Sekolah Menengah Dalam Daerah Raub,Pahang : Satu Tinjauan”. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia : Tesis Sarjana Muda. Siraj, Zainun Ishak, Tunku Mohani Tunku Mokhtar, Motivasi dalam pendidikan. Percetakan Cergas: Kuala Lumpur. Zuria Mahmud dan Amir Salleh et.al(1998), Perkembangan Kerjaya dalam Sistem Pendidikan di Malaysia. Jurnal Pengurusan dan kepimpinan Pendidikan IAB,KPM.Bil 02-Dis. .

Similar Items