Kajian Perbandingan Kesan Penggunaan Kaedah Peta Konsep dan Kaedah Kuliah Terhadap Pencapaian Esei Biologi Dalam Kalangan Pelajar Tingkatan Empat

Kajian Perbandingan Kesan Penggunaan Kaedah Peta Konsep dan Kaedah Kuliah Terhadap Pencapaian Esei Biologi Dalam Kalangan Pelajar Tingkatan Empat

The purpose of this study was to analyze effectiveness of mind mapping and lecture based teaching methods in improving achievement in Biology essay writing, among form four students who were taking pure science subjects including Biology. The study focused on mind mapping skills in improving achieve...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tiong, Susie
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
Published: 2011
Subjects:
L Education (General)
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/4021/1/s805319.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4021/7/s805319_abstract.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.4021
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
advisor Kassim, Mustapa
topic L Education (General)
spellingShingle L Education (General)
Tiong, Susie
Kajian Perbandingan Kesan Penggunaan Kaedah Peta Konsep dan Kaedah Kuliah Terhadap Pencapaian Esei Biologi Dalam Kalangan Pelajar Tingkatan Empat
description The purpose of this study was to analyze effectiveness of mind mapping and lecture based teaching methods in improving achievement in Biology essay writing, among form four students who were taking pure science subjects including Biology. The study focused on mind mapping skills in improving achievement of essay writing in Biology. This was a pre and post test plus survey based research. A stratified sampling was used in this study. Research population of 158 students was involved. 73 students were selected as research sample. Mean scores for 5 pre tests and 5 post tests were compared to seek effectiveness of mind mapping and lecture teaching methods respectively. Research data was analyzed descriptively using means and standard deviation. Finding showed that there was a significant difference in the means of achievement after using mind mapping based teaching method, in which difference values for 5 pre tests and 5 post tests were 0.9562, 1.8572, 1.1715, 1.5715 and 1.4143 respectively. Means differences recorded for lecture method were 0.0264, 0.8553, 1.1715, 0.1842 and 0.2421 respectively. The students’ acceptance towards mind mapping based method was positive-medium with respect to the control group (M=4.07, SD=.823). Overall, mind mapping was efficient in increasing students’ achievement in Biology essay writing.
format Thesis
qualification_name masters
qualification_level Master's degree
author Tiong, Susie
author_facet Tiong, Susie
author_sort Tiong, Susie
title Kajian Perbandingan Kesan Penggunaan Kaedah Peta Konsep dan Kaedah Kuliah Terhadap Pencapaian Esei Biologi Dalam Kalangan Pelajar Tingkatan Empat
title_short Kajian Perbandingan Kesan Penggunaan Kaedah Peta Konsep dan Kaedah Kuliah Terhadap Pencapaian Esei Biologi Dalam Kalangan Pelajar Tingkatan Empat
title_full Kajian Perbandingan Kesan Penggunaan Kaedah Peta Konsep dan Kaedah Kuliah Terhadap Pencapaian Esei Biologi Dalam Kalangan Pelajar Tingkatan Empat
title_fullStr Kajian Perbandingan Kesan Penggunaan Kaedah Peta Konsep dan Kaedah Kuliah Terhadap Pencapaian Esei Biologi Dalam Kalangan Pelajar Tingkatan Empat
title_full_unstemmed Kajian Perbandingan Kesan Penggunaan Kaedah Peta Konsep dan Kaedah Kuliah Terhadap Pencapaian Esei Biologi Dalam Kalangan Pelajar Tingkatan Empat
title_sort kajian perbandingan kesan penggunaan kaedah peta konsep dan kaedah kuliah terhadap pencapaian esei biologi dalam kalangan pelajar tingkatan empat
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department College of Arts and Sciences (CAS)
publishDate 2011
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/4021/1/s805319.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4021/7/s805319_abstract.pdf
_version_ 1747827665056825344
spelling my-uum-etd.40212016-04-28T00:45:07Z Kajian Perbandingan Kesan Penggunaan Kaedah Peta Konsep dan Kaedah Kuliah Terhadap Pencapaian Esei Biologi Dalam Kalangan Pelajar Tingkatan Empat 2011 Tiong, Susie Kassim, Mustapa College of Arts and Sciences (CAS) College of Arts and Sciences L Education (General) The purpose of this study was to analyze effectiveness of mind mapping and lecture based teaching methods in improving achievement in Biology essay writing, among form four students who were taking pure science subjects including Biology. The study focused on mind mapping skills in improving achievement of essay writing in Biology. This was a pre and post test plus survey based research. A stratified sampling was used in this study. Research population of 158 students was involved. 73 students were selected as research sample. Mean scores for 5 pre tests and 5 post tests were compared to seek effectiveness of mind mapping and lecture teaching methods respectively. Research data was analyzed descriptively using means and standard deviation. Finding showed that there was a significant difference in the means of achievement after using mind mapping based teaching method, in which difference values for 5 pre tests and 5 post tests were 0.9562, 1.8572, 1.1715, 1.5715 and 1.4143 respectively. Means differences recorded for lecture method were 0.0264, 0.8553, 1.1715, 0.1842 and 0.2421 respectively. The students’ acceptance towards mind mapping based method was positive-medium with respect to the control group (M=4.07, SD=.823). Overall, mind mapping was efficient in increasing students’ achievement in Biology essay writing. 2011 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/4021/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/4021/1/s805319.pdf text eng validuser https://etd.uum.edu.my/4021/7/s805319_abstract.pdf text eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Abdul Rahim Abd. Rashid. (2000). Model dan pendekatan pengajaran Sejarah KBSM. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Abdul Fatah Hassan. (1994). Penggunaan minda yang optimum dalam pembelajaran. Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Abu Hassan Kassim. (2003). Pengajaran pembelajaran Kimia di sekolah. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai. Adamczyk, & Wilson. (1996). Using concept maps with trainee physics teachers. Physics Education, 31(6), 374–381. Alias Baba. (1997). Statistik penyelidikan dalam penyelidikan sains sosial. Selangor, Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Ausubel, D. P. (1963). The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. New York: Grune & Stratton Inc. Ausubel, D. P., & Robinson, F. G. (1969). School learning: An introduction to educational psychology. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc. Ausubel, D. P, Novak, J. D., & Hanesian, H. (1978).Educational psychology: A cognitive view. (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. Beamon, G. W. (1997). Sparking the thinking of student, ages 10-14: Strategies for teachers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc. Best, J. W. (2005). Research in education (9th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education Company. Bobbi DePorter, & Mike Hernacki. (1992). Quantum learning. New York: Dell Pubishing. Brinkmann, A. (2003). Graphical knowledge display: Mindmapping and concept mapping as efficient tools in mathematics education. Mathematics Education Review, 16, 35-48. Brunner, J. (1966). Towards a theory of instruction. Cambridge: Havard University. Buzan, T. (1991). How to mind map: Make the most of your mind and learn how to create, organize, and plan. Great Britain: Martins The Printers Limited. Buzan, Tony (2007). The Buzan study skills handbook: The shortcut to success in your studies with mind mapping, speed reading and winning memories techniques. China: BBC Active. Campbell, N. A., Mitchell, L. G., & Reece, J. B. (1994). Biology concept and connections. Ontario: The Benjamin & Cummings Publishing. Carter, C., & Monaco, J. (1987). Learning information technology skills. London: British Library Research and Development Department. Carter, C. S., & Brickhohuse, N. W. (1989). What Make Chemistry Difficult? Journal of Chemical Education, 66(3), 223-225. Cliburn, J. W. (1990). Concept map to promote meaningful learning. Journal of College Science Teaching, 15(4), 393-418. Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). NJ: Pearson Education International. Davis, & Duane Tony. (2001). Comparing the social housing sectors of the Netherlands and the United States. Neurus Paper: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Diamond, M., & Hapson, J. (1998). Magic trees of the mind: How to nurture your child‟s intelligence, creativity, and healthy emotions from birth through adolescence. New York, NY: Plume. Dilip Mukerjea. (1996). Superbrain. Singapore: Oxford University Press. Drew, F., & Ottewill, R. (1998). Language in undergraduate business education: A clash of learning styles? Studies in Higher Education, 23(3), 297-305. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (1997). School transitions in early adolescence: What are we doing to our young people? Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 451-469. Edmondson, K.M. (1995). Concept mapping for the development of medical curricula. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(7), 777-793. Ee Ah Meng. (1989). Pedagogi satu pengenalan. (2nd ed.). Kuala Lumpur: Penerbitan Fajar Bakti Sdn. Bhd. Farrand, P., Hussain, F., & Hennessy, E. (2002). The efficacy of the „mind map‟ study technique. Medical Education, 36, 426-431. Feinstein, S. (2004). Secretes of the teenage brain: Research-based strategies for reaching and teaching today‟s adolescents. San Diego, CA: The Brain Store. Foo, S., C. (1988). Hubungan sikap, jantina dan penguasaan konsep asas Matematik dengan pencapaian Matematik. Tesis yang belum diterbitkan. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Selangor. Gagne, R. M. (1976). The conditions of learning. New York: Rinehart & Winston. Gagne, R. M. (1996). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction. New York: CBS Publishing Asia Ltd. Gagne, R. M., & Dick, W. (1983). Instructional psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 34, 261-295. Gagne, E. D., Yekovich, C. W., & Yekovich, F. R. (1993). The cognitive psychology of school learning. New York: Harper Collins College Publisher. Heinze-Fry, J. A., & Novak, J. D. (1990). Concept mapping brings long term movement towards meaningful learning. Science education, 74(4), 461-472. Hosford, P. L. (1975). The role of theory in instruction [Electronic version]. Educational Leadership, 32(6), 376-380. Idrus Ibrahim. (1998)Pencapaian Matematik di peringkat menengah rendah. Tesis yang belum diterbitkan. Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah. Jamil Ahmad. 1993. Tinjauan kekangan-kekangan dalam pelaksanaan Sains KBSM di Sekolah-sekolah menengah di negeri Kedah Darul Amal. Tesis Sarjana Pendidikan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Jantz, R. (1998). Concept teaching: Learning to teach (2nd ed.). New York: Mcgraw- Hill Book. Johari Hj. Shamsudin. (1995). Pendekatan konsep dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran sains. Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (1993). Huraian sukatan pelajaran Biologi Tingkatan IV. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Kinchin, I. (2000)Using concept map to reveal understanding : A two tier analysis. School Science Review, 81, 41-46. Knowles, M., Holton, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (1998). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (5th ed.). Woburn, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann. Laschinger, & Buss. (1984). Dalam Shahabudin Hashim dan Dr. Rohizani Yaakub. (2003) Psikologi pembelajaran dan personaliti. Pahang: PTS Publications & Distributors Sdn. Bhd. Lawson, A.E. (1982). The nature of advanced reasoning and science instruction. Journal of Research and Science Teaching, 12, 347-358. Lawson, A.E. (1995). Studying for Biology. New York: Harper Collins Publishers. Lawson, A. E., McElrath, C. B., Burton, M. S., James, B. D., Doyle, R. P., Woodward, S. L., Kellerman, L., & Snyder, J. D. (1991). Hypothetico-deductive reasoning skill and concept acquisition: Testing a constructivist Hypothesis. Journal of Research in ScienceTeaching, 28(10), 953-970. Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia. (2003). Laporan prestasi peperiksaan Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Lyson, T. A. (1991) . Real incomes of rulal Black and Hispanic workers fell further behind in the 1980‟s. Rural Development Perspectives , 7(2), 7-11. Mahmud Yahaya. (1990).Hubungan sikap, jantina dan penguasaan konsep asas Matematik dengan pencapaian Matematik. Tesis yang belum diterbitkan. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Selangor. Manja, M., L. (1990). Psikologi, sosiologi, dan falsafah dalam pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Margulies, N. (1991). Mapping inner space: Learning and teaching mind mapping. Tucson, AZ: Zephyr Press. Markham, K., Mintzes, J., & Jones, G. (1994). The concept map as a research and evaluation tool: Further evidence of validity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(1), 91-101. Markowitz, K., & Jensen, E. (1999). The great memory book. San Diego, CA: The Brain Store, Inc. Mat Jamudin Jamrin. (2002). Keberkesanan penggunaan teknik pengajaran peta konsep dalam mata pelajaran Ekonomi Asas Tingkatan Empat. Disertasi Sarjana Pendidikan. Fakulti Pendidikan. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. McNiff, J. (1988). Action research: Principles and practice. London: Routledge. Merrill, M. D., & ID2 Research Team. (1993). Instructional Transaction Theory: knowledge relationships among processes , entities, and activities. Educational Technology, 33(4), 5-16. Mintzes, J. J., Wandersee, J. H., & Novak, J. D. (1997) Meaningful learning in science: The human constructivist perspective. In G.D. Phye (Ed.), Handbook of academic learning: Construction of Knowledge (pp. 405-447). San Diego: Academic Press. Mok Soon Sang. (2001). Psikologi pendidikan untuk diploma perguruan semester 1. Selangor: Kumpulan Budiman Sdn. Bhd. Nakhleh, M., (1992). Why some students don‟t learn Chemistry: Chemical misconceptions. Journal of Chemical Education, 69(3), 191-196. Noh, T. & Scharmann, L. (1997). Instructional influence of a molecular-level pictorial presentation of matter on students‟ conceptions and problem-solving ability. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(2), 199-217. Nor Aini Aziz. (2002). Keberkesanan pengajaran pendekatan konstruktivisme dalam membina semula konsepsi pelajar tentang konsep-konsep fotosintesis dan makanan. Tesis Ph.D. . Universiti Sains Malaysia. Novak, J. (1979). Applying psychology and philosophy to the improvement of laboratory teaching. The American Biology Teacher, 41(8), 466-470. Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Novak, J. D. (1990). Concept mapping: A useful tool for science education. Journal of Research in Science teaching, 27(10), 937-949. Novak, J. D. (1991). Clarify with Concept Maps: A tool for students and teachers alike. The Science Teacher, 58(7), 45–49. Novak, J. D. (1993). Meaningful learning: The essential factor for conceptual change in limited or inappropriate propositional hierarchies (LIPHs) leading to empowermentof learners. The proceedings of the third international seminar on misconception and educational strategies in science and mathematics, Ithaca, N.Y, Misconceptions Trust. Odom, A. L., & Kelly, P. V. (2001). Integrating concept mapping and the learning cycle to teach diffusion and osmosis concept to high school biology. Science Education, 85(6), 615-635. Othman Lebar, & Nurhayanti Mansor. (2007). Pencapaian pelajar mengikut gaya belajar dan bentuk pentaksiran. Dicapai pada 3 Jun 2006 daripada, http://jpnperak.edua.my/portal/modules.php?name= News&file=article&sid=34. Pankratius, W.J. (1990). Building an organized knowledge base: Concept mapping and achievement in secondary school physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(4), 315-333. Pannen, Dina, P. M., dan Mestika, S. (2001). Konstruktivisme dalam pembelajaran. Jakarta: Universiti Terbukan. Paul, R. (1990). Critical thinking: What every person needs to survive in a rapidly changing world. Rohnert Park: Center for Critical Thinking and Moral Critique, Sonoma State University. Peterson, A. R., & Snyder, P. J. (1998, August). Using mind maps to teach social problems analysis. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for the Study for Social Problems. San Francisco, CA. Petry, B., Mouton, H., & Reigeluth, C. M. (1987). Instructional theories in action: Lessons illustrating selected theories and models. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates. Posner, George J., & Alan N. (2001). Course design: A guide to curriculum development for teachers. New York: Longman. Raja Gopal A/L Ponusamy. (2005). Keberkesanan pengajaran strategi metakognisi dan penyelesaian masalah di kalangan pelajar pencapaian akademik rendah dalam mata pelajaran Sejarah. Tesis Phd. Fakulti Pendidikan. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Rashidi Azizan, & Abdul Razak Habib. (1998). Pengajaran dalam bilik darjah: Kaedah dan strategi. Kajang: Masa Enterprise. Schmidt, H.J. (1984). How pupils think-empirical studies on pupil‟s understanding of simple quantitative relationships in Chemistry. The School Science Review, 66(234), 156-162. Schmidt, H.J. (1994)Stoichiometry problem solving in high school chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 16(2), 191-200. Schmid, R. F., & Telaro, G. (1990).Concept mapping as an instructional strategy for high school biology. Journal of Educational Research, 84, 78-85. Sekaran, U. (2000). Research methods for business. (3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley and Sons. Shahabudin Hashim, & Dr. Rohizani Yaakub. (2003). Psikologi pembelajaran dan personaliti. Pahang: PTS Publications & Distributors Sdn. Bhd. Sharifah Alwiah Alsagoff. (1985). Sosiologi pendidikan. Selangor: Longman Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. Sigelman, C. K. (1999). Life-span human development. New York, NY: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company. Stage, F. K. & Kloosterman, P. (1995). Gender, beliefs, and achievement in remedial college-level Mathematics. Elementary School Journal, 94, 375-388. Subadrah Nair. (2001). Kesan pendekatan teknik belajar terhadap pencapaian dan minat pelajar dalam pembelajaran. Seminar Penyelidikan Pendidikan Guru Peringkat Kebangsasan Tahun 2001. URL http:// 219.93.192.238/mpgaya/abstrak/Subadra_Nair.doc. Subahan, T. M. M. (1997). Penggunaan teori dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran. Kertas kerja dibentangkan di Seminar Kebangsaan Pendidikan Sains dan Matematik Pada Abad Ke-21, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 12-13 September 1997. Syed Anwar Aly. (2000a). Hypothetico-deductive reasoning and concept acquisition: Implications for strategies in the Malaysian smart schools. Kertas dibentangkan dalam Simposium Pendidikan Sains dan Teknologi, Pulau Pinang, 30 March–2 April, 2000. Syed Anwar Aly and Merza Abbas. (2000b) . Penyerapan kemahiran saintifik dalam proses pengajaran dan pembelajaran kimia di tahap menengah. Kertas dibentangkan dalam Seminar Pendidikan Sains dan Matematik, UiTM Shah Alam, 2 – Oktober, 2000. Taliaferro, M. (1998). Mind mapping effects on sixth grade students‟ recall ability. Unpublished master thesis, Mercer University, Atlanta, Georgia. Tee, Tze Kiong, Jailani Bin Md Yunos, Baharom Bin Mohamad, Widad Bt. Othman dan Yee, Mei Heong. (2009a). Pengintegrasian Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi Menerusi Peta Minda Bagi Mata Pelajaran Kemahiran Hidup. Persidangan Kebangsaan Pendidikan Sains dan Teknologi 2009 (PKPST 2009). m.s. 114-121. Tee, Tze Kiong, Jailani Bin Md Yunos, Baharom Bin Mohamad, Widad Bt. Othman dan Yee, Mei Heong. (2009b). Penilaian Aras Kemahiran Berfikir Menerusi Ujian SEA, Rubrik Kemahiran Berfikir Dan Rubrik Peta Minda. Persidangan Kebangsaan Pendidikan Sains dan Teknologi 2009 (PKPST 2009). m.s 5-14. Tee, Tze Kiong, Jailani Bin Md Yunos, Baharom Bin Mohamad, Widad Bt. Othman dan Yee, Mei Heong. (2010). Kepentingan Peta Minda Sebagai Alat Berfikir Dalam Mengambil Nota. International Conference on Education, Brunei (ICE 2010). Tortora, G. J. (1989). Principles of human anatomy. (5th ed.). N: Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. Vilberg, T. (1996). Using concept mapping in sensation & perception course. A paper prensented at the National Institute for the Teaching of Psychology, St. Petersburg Beach.FL (atas talian) http://river.claroin.edu/ TRVILBERG/conceptmap.html (09.02.2007). Wahidin, Kamisah Osman, & Subahan Mohd. Meerah. (2004). Penggunaan peta konsep dan peta vee dalam meningkatkan sikap pelajar terhadap kimia. Jurnal Pendidikan, 29, 125-144. Wan Nani Norzara Wan Mohamad Razali. (2004). Strategi pembelajaran Kimia: Satu tinjauan ke atas pelajar Fakulti Pendidikan UKM. Latihan Ilmiah. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi. Wan Noorazah Wan Md. Nawi. (2004). Strategi pembelajaran Biologi pelajar Melayu dan bukan Melayu di UKM: Satu tinjauan. Latihan Ilmiah. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi. Wandersee, J. H., Mintzes, J. J., & Novak, J. D. (1994). Research On Alternative Conceptions In Science. Gabel, D.L. (ed.), Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning. (177–210). New York: Macmillan. Wedekind, J. (1993). Learning about dynamic biological systems – a stimulation and modeling approach. In D. C. Johnson & B. Samways (Eds.), Informatics and Changes in Learning (pp. 143-148). Berlin: Springer-Verlag. Widad Othman dan Kandar Selamat. (2006). Types of learning. Kuala Lumpur: PD Offset Sdn. Bhd. Williams, Frederick and Monge. (2001). Reasoning with statistics: How to read quantitative research. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt College Publisher. Williams, M. H. (1999). The effects of a brain-based learning strategy, mind mapping, on achievement of adults in a training environment with consideration to learning styles and brain hemisphericity (Doctoral dissertation, University of North Texas, 1999). Dissertation Abstracts International, 60, 15- 25. Willerman, M., & Mac Harg, R. A. (1991). The concept map as an advance organizer. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(8), 705-711. Wiseman, & Frank, L. (1981). The teaching of college chemistry: Role of student development level. Journal of Chemical Education, 58(6): 484-488. Wong Ling Chun. (2004). Strategi pembelajaran Fizik di kalangan pelajar Fakulti Pendidikan dan Fakulti Sains dan Teknologi : Satu tinjauan. Latihan Ilmiah. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi. Woolfolk, A. E. (1994) Educational psychology. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Woolfolk, A. (2001). Educational psychology (8th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: A Pearson Education Company. Wycoff, J. (1991) . Mindmapping: Your personal guide to exploring creativity and problem-solving. New York, NY: The Berkley Publishing Group. Yustini Yusuf. (2006). Upaya peningkatan aktifitas dan hasil belajar biologi melalui penggunaan peta konsep pada siswa kelas II4, SMP negeri Pekan Baru. Jurnal Biogenesis, 2(2), 59-63. Zamri Mahamod. (2004). Strategi pembelajaran Bahasa Melayu di kalangan pelajar cemerlang sekolah menengah. Tesis Dr. Fal. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi. Zamri Mahamod, Md. Yusoff Daud & N. Suriya N. Mustapha. (2004). Penggunaan strategi pembelajaran Biologi dikalangan pelajar Tingkatan 4. Proceedings of National Conference on Science and Mathematics Education Innovations for Excellence 1-17. Zuhara Aziz. (2009). Penggunaan peta konsep untuk meningkatkan pencapaian mata pelajaran Sejarah bagi pelajar Tingkatan Dua. Jurnal Pendidkan Malaysia, 32(1), 3-15.

Similar Items