Stres guru dengan gaya kepimpinan guru besar Sekolah Kebangsaan di Kulim

This study is being carried out to identify the Principal's most dominant leadership style in National school based on teacher's view and relationship with teachers' stress level in Kulim. The leadership style that is being studied is the structured dimensional leadership and consider...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Mohd Shukri, Md Jaafar
Format:	Thesis
Language:	eng eng
Published:	2010
Subjects:	LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
Online Access:	https://etd.uum.edu.my/4257/1/s800547.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/4257/7/s800547_abstract.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-uum-etd.4257
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection	UUM ETD
language	eng eng
advisor	Arsaythamby, Vello
topic	LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
spellingShingle	LB2801-3095 School administration and organization Mohd Shukri, Md Jaafar Stres guru dengan gaya kepimpinan guru besar Sekolah Kebangsaan di Kulim
description	This study is being carried out to identify the Principal's most dominant leadership style in National school based on teacher's view and relationship with teachers' stress level in Kulim. The leadership style that is being studied is the structured dimensional leadership and considerate dimension leadership. The survey and research was participated by seven national schools in Kulim, Kedah with 243 population of teachers. Respondents were 152 teachers which was chosen randomly out of the total percentage of teachers from schools that participated in the study. The teachers' stress level is being studied based on the Principal's leadership style either by structured or considerate dimension style. Teachers' stress level are categorised to three levels namely low, medium and high. Datas collected are analysed with the Statistical Package software for School Science (SPSS 12) for Windows. The Principal's leadership style was tested by using LBDQ questionnaire instrument (Leadership Behavior Description Questionnaire). Datas processed involved the descriptive statistics namely frequency measurement, mean score, standard deviation and percentage. The instrument credibility value is 0.83. Study findings shows that Principal uses both leadership style namely by structured dimension and considerate dimension with the value of (min=3.35). Nevertheless, Principal exerts more to structured dimension leadership style compared to considerate dimension style. Teachers' overall stress level were on moderate level with the value of (min=3.27). Principal's leadership style also showed a significant connection with teacher's stress. However, the connection are weak and negatively between the structured leadership style with teacher's stress (r = -.34). While considerate relationship style connection with teacher's stress is also significant but with weak positive relationship (r = .38).
format	Thesis
qualification_name	masters
qualification_level	Master's degree
author	Mohd Shukri, Md Jaafar
author_facet	Mohd Shukri, Md Jaafar
author_sort	Mohd Shukri, Md Jaafar
title	Stres guru dengan gaya kepimpinan guru besar Sekolah Kebangsaan di Kulim
title_short	Stres guru dengan gaya kepimpinan guru besar Sekolah Kebangsaan di Kulim
title_full	Stres guru dengan gaya kepimpinan guru besar Sekolah Kebangsaan di Kulim
title_fullStr	Stres guru dengan gaya kepimpinan guru besar Sekolah Kebangsaan di Kulim
title_full_unstemmed	Stres guru dengan gaya kepimpinan guru besar Sekolah Kebangsaan di Kulim
title_sort	stres guru dengan gaya kepimpinan guru besar sekolah kebangsaan di kulim
granting_institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department	College of Arts and Sciences (CAS)
publishDate	2010
url	https://etd.uum.edu.my/4257/1/s800547.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/4257/7/s800547_abstract.pdf
_version_	1747827704240013312
spelling	my-uum-etd.42572014-12-23T04:39:55Z Stres guru dengan gaya kepimpinan guru besar Sekolah Kebangsaan di Kulim 2010 Mohd Shukri, Md Jaafar Arsaythamby, Vello College of Arts and Sciences (CAS) College of Arts and Sciences LB2801-3095 School administration and organization This study is being carried out to identify the Principal's most dominant leadership style in National school based on teacher's view and relationship with teachers' stress level in Kulim. The leadership style that is being studied is the structured dimensional leadership and considerate dimension leadership. The survey and research was participated by seven national schools in Kulim, Kedah with 243 population of teachers. Respondents were 152 teachers which was chosen randomly out of the total percentage of teachers from schools that participated in the study. The teachers' stress level is being studied based on the Principal's leadership style either by structured or considerate dimension style. Teachers' stress level are categorised to three levels namely low, medium and high. Datas collected are analysed with the Statistical Package software for School Science (SPSS 12) for Windows. The Principal's leadership style was tested by using LBDQ questionnaire instrument (Leadership Behavior Description Questionnaire). Datas processed involved the descriptive statistics namely frequency measurement, mean score, standard deviation and percentage. The instrument credibility value is 0.83. Study findings shows that Principal uses both leadership style namely by structured dimension and considerate dimension with the value of (min=3.35). Nevertheless, Principal exerts more to structured dimension leadership style compared to considerate dimension style. Teachers' overall stress level were on moderate level with the value of (min=3.27). Principal's leadership style also showed a significant connection with teacher's stress. However, the connection are weak and negatively between the structured leadership style with teacher's stress (r = -.34). While considerate relationship style connection with teacher's stress is also significant but with weak positive relationship (r = .38). 2010 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/4257/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/4257/1/s800547.pdf text eng validuser https://etd.uum.edu.my/4257/7/s800547_abstract.pdf text eng public http://lintas.uum.edu.my:8080/elmu/index.jsp?module=webopac-l&action=fullDisplayRetriever.jsp&szMaterialNo=0000801276 masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Abdul Shukur AMullali (2004). Seminar Nasional Pengurusan & Kepeminipinan Pendidikan Ke 12. Kertas Kerja Seminar Nasional Pengurusan dan Kepemimpinan Pendidikan Ke 12, pada 14 - 17 Julai 2004, Anjuran lnstitut Aminuddin Baki. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Genting Highlands. Ail1011 Mohd (2005). Teori dan teknik kepimpinan: panduan aplikasi di tempat kerja. Pahang: PTS Professional. kiilnudiii Molid Yusof (1990). Siri ana1isis psikologi: kepimpinan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Aizzat Mohd Nasarudin. Intan Osman & Zainal Ariffin Ahmad (2006). Pengantar pengurusan. Kuala Lumpur : Utusan Publication & Distributors. Alex Roney & Cary Cooper (1997). Professionals on workplace stress. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Ali Murat Sunbul (2003). An analysis of relations among locus of control, burnout and job satisfaction in Turkish high school teachers. Australian Journal of Education. 47(1), ms 30-43. Azizi Yahaya & Nik Diana Hartika Nik Husain (2007). Tahap Stes dan Faktor-faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Guru Sekolah di Negeri Johor. Melaka, Selangor dan Negeri Sembilan. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Azizi Yahaya. Shahrin Hashim. Jamaludin Ramli, Yusof Boon. Abdul Rahim Hamdan. (2007). Menguasai penyelidikan dalam pendidikan: Teori analisis dan interpretasi data. Kuala Lumpur. PTS Profesional Publishing. Azlin Norhaini Mansor (2004). Amalan Pengurusan Pengetua: Satu Kajian Kes. Kertas Kerja Di bentangkan Dalam Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pengurusan Dan Kepimpinan. Pendidikan Ke-12,6-9 Disember 2004. IAB. Genting Highlands. Azrul Hisham Abdul Manaf (2009). Faktor-faktor tekanan dm kesannya kepada guru Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan: Satu kajian di daerah Timur Laut Pulau Pinang. Universiti Utara Malaysia. Mulford, B., Edmunds. B., Ewington. J., Kendall. L., Kendall. D., & Silins. H. (2007). Successful school principalship in late-carier. .Journal of Educational Administration, 47(1). ms. 36-49. Cousin. S., L. (2000). An analysis of stress factors and induction practices that influence a novice teacher's intention to stay in the profession. The University of Southern Mississippi : Degree Dissertation. De Jesus, Saul Neves, Conboy & Joseph (2001). A Stress Management Course to Prevent Teacher Distress. International Journal of Educational Management. 15(3), ms 1-8. Allison, D. G (1997). Coping With Stress In The Principalship. International Journal of Educational Management, 35(1), ms 62-75. Edwards, D. & Burnard, P. (2003). Systematic Review of Stress and Stress Management Interventions for Mental Health Nurses, Journal of Advanced Nursing. 42(2), ms 118-132. Gardner, J. (1990). On leadership. New York: Free Press. Hanes, T. (2002). Stress Is Funny....ha ha; Former 911 Dispatchers Uses Humor To Teach Coping Strategies. Toronto, Ontario. Harun Arrasyid Haji Tuskan (2006) Menangani konflik emosi menurut pandangan Islam. Selangor: Edusystem Sdn. Bhd. Hatta Sidi & Mohanled Hatta S hallarom (2005). Mengurus stres pendekatan yang praktikal. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Hatta Sidi dm Ruzanna Zam Zam (2003). Menjaga kesihatan jiwa. Teknik mengurus stres. Kuala Lumpur: PTS Publications & Distributors. Hayes. D., Christie. P., Mills, M. & Lingard. B. (2004). Productive leaders and productive leadership: School as learning organisations. Journal of Educational Administration. 42 (5). ms 520-538. Hoog., J., Johansson. 0. & Olofsson.A. (2005). Successful principalship: the Swedish case. Journal of Educational Administration, 43(6), ms 142-158. Hoy. W. K. (2002). An analysis of enabling and mindful school structures: Some theoretical. research and practical considerations. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(1), ms 87-108. Huber, S. G. (2004). School leadership and leadership development: Adjusting leadership theories and development programs to values and the core purpose of school. Journal of Educational Administration, 42(6), ms 669-684. Hussein Mahmood (1993). Kepimpinan dan Keberkesanan Sekolah. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Ismail Werdani dan Zainon Salleh (2000). Bersatu Memartabatkan Profesion Keguruan. Jurnal Pendidikan Persidangan Kebangsaan Pengetua-pengetua Sekolah Menengah Malaysia Johor. Ogos. 1-7. Jaafar Muhammad (2003), Kelakuan organisasi. Kuala Lumpur; Leeds Publications. Jamalullail A. Wahab dan Zawiah Kamad (2007). Hubungan antara gaya kepimpinan pengetua dengan motivasi guru Sekolah Menengah Agama. Jurnal Pengurusan Pendidikan Institusi Aminudin Baki. 17 (2), ms 75-90. Jonson. S., Cooper, C., Cartwight. S., Taylor, P. & Millet, V. (2005). The experience of work-related stress across occupations. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 20(2), ms 178-187. Krejcie, R. V. & Morgan, D. W (1970). Determining Sample Size For Research Activities. Education and Psychological Measurement, 30, ms 607-610. Kyriacou. C., & Sutcliffe. J. (1978). Teacher stress: Prevalence, sources, and symptoms. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 48. ms 159-167. Lunenburg,F.C., & Ornstein, A. C. (2000). Educational administration: Concepts and practices. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thompson Learning. Mahawa Pilus (2005). Perbezaan Stail kepimpinan pengetua sekolah swasta dan sekolah kerajaan di Melaka. Kertas yang dibentangkan dalam Seminar Penyelidikan Pendidikan 2007. di Institut Perguruan Batu Lintang. Mohamad Ikhsan (2001) Ke arah kecemerlangan pendidikan melalui amalan budaya penyayang. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru. 14, ms 5-12. Mohammad Rodhi (2003). Kajian tahap stres di kalangan guru sekolah menengah: Perbandingan di antara sekolah menengah dalam bandar dan sekolah menengah luar bandar di Negeri Kedah. Universiti Utara Malaysia. Mohd Azhar Abd. Hamid (2004). EQ- Panduan Meningkatkan Kecerdasan Emosi. Pahang: PTS Publications & Distributors. Mohd Najib A. Ghafar & Tinah Naim (2007). Penilaian hubungan gaya kepimpinan pengetua dengan stres guru. Jurnal Pendidikan Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. 12. ms 61-70. Mohd Nor Jaafar & Ismail Mat Ludin (2007). Kajian stres guru pelatih praktikum. Kertas yang dibentangkan dalam Seminar Penyelidikan Pendidikan 2007, di lnstitut Perguruan Batu Lintang. Mohd Taib Dora & Hamdan Abd Kadir (2006). Mengurus stres. Selangor: PTS Professional. Mohd. Salleh Lebar (1994). Pengajian Dan Pendidikan- Asas Psikologi Perkembangan. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications & Distributors Sdn. Bhd. Mokhtar Ahmad (2005). Tekanan kerja di kalangan guru sekolah menengah: Satu kajian di Daerah Kulim Bandar Baharu; Kedah Darul Aman. Tesis Sarjana Sains. Bintulu: Universiti Malaysia Sarawak. Moriarty, V., Edmonds. P., Blatchford. P. and Martin, C. (2001). Pupil Adult Ratio Differences and Educutional Progress over Reception and Key Stage 1 Institute of Education, University of London. Noran Fauziah Yaakub dan Ahmad Mahdzan Ayob (1992). Guru dan Perguruan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Norasmah Othman dan Kamaruzaman Moidunny (2007). Kepimpinan pendidikan dan pengurusan pendidikan: Cabaran kepada guru besar dan pengetua. Jurnal Pengurusun Pendidikan Institut Aminudin Baki, 17(2), ms 117-131. Norhannan Ramli & Jamaliah A. Hamid (2006) Gaya kepimpinan pengetua wanita dan hubungannya dengan tahap motivasi guru sekolah menengah. Jurnal Pendidikan 31(2), ms 53-69. Nor Hanani Hussin (2007). Membina Sukses Tanpa Stres. Selangor: Edusystem. Ong Mee Nee (2001). Stail Kepimpinan Pengetua Dan Hubungannya Dengan Tekanan Kerja Guru. Tesis Sarjana Pendidikan, UKM Bangi. Punanesvaran A.Nadairaja (2000). Hubungan bebanan kerja dengan tekanan kerja di kalangan guru lelaki dan guru wanita di sebuah sekolah rendah di kawasan Bandar. Kertas Projek Ijazah Sarjana yang tidak diterbitkan. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Utusan Malaysia. (2006, 29 Mac). Ramai guru berpenyakit & akibat stres. Razali Mat Zin (1996). Kepimpinan dalam Pengurusan. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications & Distributors Sdn. Ehd. Shahbuddin Hashim & Rohaizani Ismail (2003). Psikologi pemhelajaran dan personality. Kuala Lumpur: PTS Publications and Distributors Sdn Rhd. Tee, Sook Kim dan Azizi Haji Yahya (2006) dalam Abstrak Seminar Projek Sarjana Muda 10-14 April 2006. Fakulti Pendidikan. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Tinah Naim (2007). Gaya kepimpinan pengetua dan hubungannya dengan stres guru di sebuah daerah di Negeri Johor. UTM Johor. Wan Ameran Wan Amat (2000). Tekanan kerja di kalangan guru-guru sekolah menengah dalam kawasan Felda Jempol. Negeri Sembilan. Projek Penyelidikan Sarjana yang tidak diterbitkm. Serdang: Universiti Putra Malaysia.

Stres guru dengan gaya kepimpinan guru besar Sekolah Kebangsaan di Kulim

Similar Items