Hubungan di antara gaya komunikasi guru besar dengan komitmen guru sekolah rendah di Daerah Sandakan, Sabah

Hubungan di antara gaya komunikasi guru besar dengan komitmen guru sekolah rendah di Daerah Sandakan, Sabah

The purpose of the study was to identify the relationship between the communication styles of head masters and commitment of primary school teachers in the District of Sandakan. The aspects being studied were 10 communication styles namely Friendly, Impression Learning, Relaxed, Animated, Attentive...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Maslinah, Mohd. Taib
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
Published: 2011
Subjects:
LB Theory and practice of education
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/4289/1/s805203.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4289/2/s805203_abstract.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.4289
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
advisor Kasim, Abd. Latif
topic LB Theory and practice of education
spellingShingle LB Theory and practice of education
Maslinah, Mohd. Taib
Hubungan di antara gaya komunikasi guru besar dengan komitmen guru sekolah rendah di Daerah Sandakan, Sabah
description The purpose of the study was to identify the relationship between the communication styles of head masters and commitment of primary school teachers in the District of Sandakan. The aspects being studied were 10 communication styles namely Friendly, Impression Learning, Relaxed, Animated, Attentiveness, Contentions, Expressive, Dramatic, Open and Dominant while three types of commitment were Identification, Involvement, and Loyalty. The research sample consisted of 148 school teachers who were randomly selected from 5 primary urban schools. The studied had used questionnaire approach to collect the research data. The instrument Communicator Style Measure (CSM) by Norton (1983) was employed to measure the abovementioned dimensions. The Alpha Cronbach value for the communication styles were reported .95. The instrument used for Organizational Commitment was developed by Cook (1980) which had Alpha Cronbach value of .89 in this study. The questionnaires were collected, reviewed and analyzed by using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 19.0 through means, frequencies, percentages, and standard deviations. To test the 10 hypothesis developed for the study, the correlation coefficients of Pearson,r were used. The findings had shown that 9 dimensions of communication styles were significantly related with teacher commitment and while Animated dimension was not significantly related with teacher commitment. Some recommendations for improvement were made such as to extend the scope of study to other districts in Sabah especially in the rural areas involving larger samples.
format Thesis
qualification_name masters
qualification_level Master's degree
author Maslinah, Mohd. Taib
author_facet Maslinah, Mohd. Taib
author_sort Maslinah, Mohd. Taib
title Hubungan di antara gaya komunikasi guru besar dengan komitmen guru sekolah rendah di Daerah Sandakan, Sabah
title_short Hubungan di antara gaya komunikasi guru besar dengan komitmen guru sekolah rendah di Daerah Sandakan, Sabah
title_full Hubungan di antara gaya komunikasi guru besar dengan komitmen guru sekolah rendah di Daerah Sandakan, Sabah
title_fullStr Hubungan di antara gaya komunikasi guru besar dengan komitmen guru sekolah rendah di Daerah Sandakan, Sabah
title_full_unstemmed Hubungan di antara gaya komunikasi guru besar dengan komitmen guru sekolah rendah di Daerah Sandakan, Sabah
title_sort hubungan di antara gaya komunikasi guru besar dengan komitmen guru sekolah rendah di daerah sandakan, sabah
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts & Sciences
publishDate 2011
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/4289/1/s805203.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4289/2/s805203_abstract.pdf
_version_ 1747827706752401408
spelling my-uum-etd.42892016-04-27T06:37:17Z Hubungan di antara gaya komunikasi guru besar dengan komitmen guru sekolah rendah di Daerah Sandakan, Sabah 2011 Maslinah, Mohd. Taib Kasim, Abd. Latif Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts & Sciences Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts & Sciences LB Theory and practice of education The purpose of the study was to identify the relationship between the communication styles of head masters and commitment of primary school teachers in the District of Sandakan. The aspects being studied were 10 communication styles namely Friendly, Impression Learning, Relaxed, Animated, Attentiveness, Contentions, Expressive, Dramatic, Open and Dominant while three types of commitment were Identification, Involvement, and Loyalty. The research sample consisted of 148 school teachers who were randomly selected from 5 primary urban schools. The studied had used questionnaire approach to collect the research data. The instrument Communicator Style Measure (CSM) by Norton (1983) was employed to measure the abovementioned dimensions. The Alpha Cronbach value for the communication styles were reported .95. The instrument used for Organizational Commitment was developed by Cook (1980) which had Alpha Cronbach value of .89 in this study. The questionnaires were collected, reviewed and analyzed by using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 19.0 through means, frequencies, percentages, and standard deviations. To test the 10 hypothesis developed for the study, the correlation coefficients of Pearson,r were used. The findings had shown that 9 dimensions of communication styles were significantly related with teacher commitment and while Animated dimension was not significantly related with teacher commitment. Some recommendations for improvement were made such as to extend the scope of study to other districts in Sabah especially in the rural areas involving larger samples. 2011 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/4289/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/4289/1/s805203.pdf text eng validuser https://etd.uum.edu.my/4289/2/s805203_abstract.pdf text eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Abdullah Hassan. (1997). Komunikasi untuk pemimpin. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publication & Distributors Sdn Bhd. Abd. Aziz Yusof. (2000) Perubahan dalam kepimpinan. Sintok: Penerbit Universiti Utara Malaysia. Abd. Aziz Yusof. (2007). Keinsanan Dalam Pengurusan. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications & Distributors Sdn Bhd. Abd. Halim Hassan. (1994). Komunikasi dalam pengurusan pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Delmu (M) Sdn. Bhd. Abdul Mua'ti @ Zamri Ahmad. (2001). Santun Komunikasi. KL: Dewan Bahasa Pustaka. Abd. Shukor Abdullah. (1991). Pengurusan organisasi perspektif pemikiran dan teori. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Abdul Shukor Abdullah. (1995). Membina sekolah yang berkesan. Aplikasi Dasar. Kertas Kerja seminar sekolah Efektif. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Adler, R.B., Rosefield, L.B., & Towne N. (1999). Interplay: The process of interpersonal communication. Fort Woth: Harcourt Brace. Adler, R.B., & Towne N. (1999). Looking out, looking in (9th ed). Fort Woth: Harcout Brace. Ahmad Atory Hussain. (1985). Prinsip pengurusan di sektor awam dan swasta. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publishing & Distributors Sdn. Bhd. Ahmad Atory Hussain. (1986). Tingkah laku organisasi dalam pengurusun moden. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Ahmad Atory Hussain. (1991). Pengurusun Organisasi. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publishings & Distributors Sdn. Bhd. Ahmad Kamil Mohamed. (1992). Kejayaan Berkomunikasi Dalam Era Masyarakat Informasi. Kuala Lumpur: Nurin Enterprise. Ahmad Sarji Hamid. (1991). Perkhidmatan yang berkualiti. Kuala Lumpur: INTAN. Alexandar, R. E., Helms, M. M., & Wilkins, R.D. (1989). The Relationship Between Supervisor Communication and Subordinate Performance & Satisfaction among professionals. Public Personnel Management, 13(4): 415-437. Alvesson, M., & Deetz, S. (2000). Doing critical management research. London: Sage. Angle, H., & Peny, J. (1987). Organizational commitment: Individual and organizational influences, work and occupations. 10: 123- 146. Arsaythamby Veloo, dan Arumugam Raman. (2009). Panduan Menganalisis & Menginterpretasi Data. Penerbit: UUM. Baird, J.E. (1977). The dynamic of organizational communication. New York: Harper & Row. Barbie. (1990). Servey research method (2nd, ed). Belmont CA: Wadsworh Publishing Company. Beebe, S.A., Beebe, S.J., & Redmond, M.V. (1999). Interpersonal communication: Relating to nothers. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Browning, L.D. (1992). List and stories as organizational communication. Communication theory. Che Su Mustaffa. (2000). Komunikasi organisasi dan hubungannya dengan kepuasan kerja dan komitmen keorganisasian di sektor swasta dan sektor awam. UUM. Tesis Sarjana. Conrad, C. (1985). Strategic organizational communications, cultures, situations and adaptation. New York: CBS Collage Publishing. Cole, C. M. (1982). Impression formation as a function of Nonverbal communication, psychological masculinity-feminity, and thesituational demands. University of Montana. Cook, J., D. Hepwort. (1980). The experience of work-A compendium and preview of 249 measure and their use. London: Academic Press. Corman, S. R., & Poole, M. S. (2000). Perspectives on organizational communication. New York: Guilford Press. Daniels, T. D., & Spiker, B. K. (1987). Perspectives on organizational communication. W.C. Brown. Dessler, G. (1993). Winning commitment: How to build and keep a competitive workplace. New York: McGraw Hill. Downs, C.W., & Hazen, M.D. (1977). A factor Analythic: Study of communication. Journal of Bussiness communication. Vol. 14 Denton, D.K. (1993). Open Communication. Business Horizon. 36(5): 64-69. Ezhar Tamam, & Jusang Bolong (2000). Modul Kaedah Penyelidikan Komunikasi. IDEAL: Universiti Putra Malaysia. Falcione, R.L., Sussman L., & Harden, R.P. (1997). Communication climate in Organization dlm. Handbook of Organizational communication. Newbury Park: Sage Publication. Fauziah Kamaruddin (1996). Gaya komunikasi pengetua dan persepsi guru. Satu kajian di beberapa sekolah menengah di Jerebu, N Sembilan. UTM. Projek Sarjana. Ferguson, S.D., & Ferguson, S.(l988). Organizational communication. Canada: Transaction Publishers. Frewer, L.J., Howard, C. & Shepherd, R. (1996). Effective communication about genetic engineering and food. British Food Journal, 98: 48-52. Goldhaber, G.M. (1992). Komunikasi dalam oganisasi. Terjemahan oleh Omardin Hj. Ashaari, Azhar Rasuan dan Wan Din. Kuala Lumpur. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Griffin, R. W. (1990). Management. Boston: Houghton. Harris, O.J., & Hartman, S. J. (2001).0rganizational behavior. NewYork: Best Business Book. Hashim Fauzy Yaacob. (2001). Komunikasi antara manusia. Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Hinrich, J.R. (1964). Communication activiy of industrial research personnel. Personnel Psychology, 17: 199. Hoy, W.K. & Miskel, W.G. (1991). Educational administration: Theory, research and pratice. Ed. Ke 4. Singapore: McGraw-Hill.Inc. Hoy, W.K. & Miskel, W.G. (1 996). Educational administration: Theory, research and pratice. Ed. Ke 5. Singapore: McGraw-Hill.Inc. Hussin Mahmood (1993). Kepimpinan dan keberkesanaan sekolah. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Ibrahim Mamat (1993). Kepemimpinan Sekolah Teori Untuk Praktis. Kuala Lumpur: Kumpulan Budiman Sdn. Bhd. Ibrahim Mamat (2001). Pengetua Sekolah: Menangani Isu dan Cabaran Kepemimpinan. Kuala Lumpur: Kumpulan Budiman Sdn. Bhd. Institut Aminuddin Baki (1997). Profil Kepimpinan sekolah/Guru Besar Berkesan. Kertas kerja dibentang oleh Institut Aminuddin Baki di Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Ishak Abdul Hamid, & Jusang Bolong (2000). Modul Kemahiran Komunikasi Antara Perseorangan. IDEAL: UPM. Ismail Salleh (2000). Komunikasi dalam organisasiperniagaan: Pelita Bahasa. Ismail Salleh (2000). Saluran komunikasiformal dalam organisasi perniagaan. Pelita Bahasa. Jamaliah Jaafar. (2002). Hubungan gaya komunikusipengurus dengan kepuasan kerja dan Komitmen pekerja: Satu kajian di Jabatan Perangkuan Malaysia. UUM. Tesis Sarjana. Katz, D., & Kahn, R.L. (1978). The Social Psychologv of Organizations. Ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Koehler, J. W ., Anatol, K.W., & Applbaun, R.L. (1981). Organizational communication: Behavioral Perspective. New York: Holt. Rinehart and Winston. Krajewski, R.J. (1979). Roles effectiveness: Theory into practice. Phi Delta Kappan. 28(1): 53-58. Krejcie, R.V., & Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining Sample Size For research Activities. Educational and Psychonological Measurement. New York: Sage Publication. Inc. Koontz, H., & Weihrich, H. (2006). Essentials of management. Tata McGraw-Hill Education. Likert, R. (1991). New patterns of managerment. New York: McGraw-Hill. Manning,P.K. (1992). Organizational communication. New York: Aldine De Gruyter. Mejar Shamsuddin Mohd. Shariff. (2000). Tahap komitmen terhadap organisasi anggota-anggota 10 briged infanteri Malaysia baracut): Satu Kajian emperikal. UUM Tesis Sarjana. Miller, K. (2006). Organizational communication: approches and processes. Canada: Wadsworth Cengage Learning. Mintzberg, H. (1973). Essentials of management. New York: Harper & Row. Modaff, D.P., DeWine, S., & Butler, J.A. (2007). Organizational communication: foundations, challenges, and misunderstandings. Boston: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon. Modaff, D, P., DeWine, S., & Butler, J. A. (2007). Organizational Communication: foundations, challenges, and misunderstandings. Boston: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon. Organizationa1 Communication. Mokhtar Ismail. (2011). Kaedah penyelidikan kuantitatifdaIam pendidikan. Kuala Lurnpur: Dewan Bahasa Pustaka. Muhd. Mansur Abdullah. (1998). Komunikasi dalam pengurusan. KL: Dewan Bahasa Pustaka. Naher, W. W. (1997). Organizational communication: challenges of change, diversity, and continuity. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Nik Hasna Nik Mahood. (1994). Kesan komunikasi ketua-pekerja ke atas kepuasan kerja dan iltizam pekerja kepada organisasi: Satu tinjauan di sebuah kilang elektronik di Bandar Baru Bangi, Selangor. UKM. Tesis Sarjana. Norton, & Robert. (1983). Communicator Style: Theory, Application and Measure. London: Sage Publication Papa, M.J., Daniels, T.D., & Spiker, B.K. (2007). Organizational communication: perspectives and trends. Sage Publications. Ramaiah A.L. (1999). Kepimpinanan pendidikan: Cabaran masa kini. Ed. ke-2. Petaling Jaya: IBS Buku Sdn. Bhd. Redding, W.C. (1972) Communication within the organization: An interpretive review of theory and research. New York : Industrial Communication Counsil. Rozhan Othman. (1991). Pengurusun Personel dan Perancangan Guna Tenaga. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Ruzlan Md. Ali dan Fauziah Shafie. (2009). Amalan Pendekatan Belajar. Penerbit: UUM. Salant, Priscilla&Dillman, Don A..(1994).How to conduct your own survey. [Books24x7 version] Available from http://common.books24x7.com/book/id_4863/book.asp. Dicapai pada 1/2/2011. Samsuddin A. Rahim. (1993). Komunikasi asas. KL: Dewan Bahasa Pustaka. Saracheck, B. & Abdul Harnid A. (1991). A survey of Malaysian personnel practise and problems. Malaysian Management. Review, 21(3), 52-63. Sarimah Abd. Razak. (1996). Hubungan di antara gaya komunikasi penyelia dengan komitmen pekerja terhadap organisasi: Satu tinjauan di Matsushita Audio Video (M) Johor Baharu, Johor. UTM. Tesis Sarjana. Sekaran, Uma. (1992). Research methods for business: A skill bulding approach. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Seman Salleh. (1996). Hubungan komunikasi antara individu pekerja-ketua dengan komunikasi pekerja terhadap organisasi: Satu tinjauan di Kilang Santronics, Johor. UTM. Tesis Sarjana. Sergiovanni, T. J. (1984). Leadership and excellant in schooling. Education Leadership. 41(5), 4-13. Simon, H.A. (1945). Administrative behavior. New York: Free Press. Snyder, R. A. (1984). Organizational communication and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology: 66(1): 13-27. Susanto, A.S. (1987). Komunikasi Teori dan Praktis. Kuala Lumpur. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Swanson, Richard A., Holton III (eds), & Elwood F. (2005). Research in organizations: foundations and methods of inquiry. [Books24x7 version] Available from http://common.books24x7.com/book/id_11859/book.asp. Dicapai pada 3/3/2011. Teo Soon Ching. (1998). Hubungan di antara gaya komunikusi guru besar dengan guru sekolah: Satu tinjauan di beberapa buah sekolah rendah jenis kebangsaan cina di Kelantan. UTM. Tesis Sarjana. Tuan Yacob R. Mohamad. (1998). Hubungan di antara gaya komunikasi guru besar dengan komitmen guru kepada sekolah. Tesis Sarjana. Skudai: UTM. VandenBos, G. R. (Ed.) (2007). APA dictionary of psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Varona, F. (1996). Relationship between communication satisfication and organizational commitment in three Quatamelan organizations. Journal of Business Cmmunication. 33: 111-140. Wan Mohd. Zahid Mohd. Nordin (1993). Wwasanpendidikan, agendapengisian. K.L: Nurin Enterprise. Williams, J. H. (2008). Employee engagement: Improvingparticipation in safety. Professional Safety, 53(12), 40-45. Zaitol Akmaliah. (1998). Pentadbiran pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Fajar Bakti Sdn. Bhd. Zahari Jaafar. (2002). Hubungan di antara gaya komunikasi pengetua dan komitmen guru kepada sekolah: Satu tinjauan di beberapa buah sekolah menengah kebangsaan di daerah Kuala Krai, Kelantan Darul Naim. UUM. Tesis Sarjana. Zalabak, P. S. (1999). Fundamentals of organizational communication: knowledge, sensitivity, skills and values. Addison-Wesley

Similar Items