Kepimpinan pengajaran pengetua dan hubungannya dengan komitmen guru-guru sekolah menengah di Daerah Samarahan, Sarawak

Kepimpinan pengajaran pengetua dan hubungannya dengan komitmen guru-guru sekolah menengah di Daerah Samarahan, Sarawak

The purpose of the study is to determine the leadership style of principals of secondary school in District of Samarahan, Sarawak and their influence on teachers commitment. The cross-sectional survey method using standardized-item questionnaires was employed in this study. The respondents consist o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zabariah, Saad
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
Published: 2011
Subjects:
LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/4306/1/s805324.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4306/13/s805324_abstract.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.4306
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
advisor Mustafa, Ismail
topic LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
spellingShingle LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
Zabariah, Saad
Kepimpinan pengajaran pengetua dan hubungannya dengan komitmen guru-guru sekolah menengah di Daerah Samarahan, Sarawak
description The purpose of the study is to determine the leadership style of principals of secondary school in District of Samarahan, Sarawak and their influence on teachers commitment. The cross-sectional survey method using standardized-item questionnaires was employed in this study. The respondents consist of 260 teachers choosen randomly from 8 schools in District of Samarahan, Sarawak. The Instructional Leadership Survey Questionnaire by Lahui-Ako (2001) was used to measure the dimensions of Instructional leadership. While the Diagnostic Assessment of School and Principal Effectiveness (DASPE) by Ebmeier (1990) was used to measure teachers' commitment in school. Four null hypotheses were developed and tested using t-test, Anova and Pearson correlation. The finding of the study showed that instructional leadership influenced by a simple commitment of teachers, especially in the dimensions of promoting a positive learning environment that is r=.31, p <.01, while the dimensions of monitoring and providing feedback to teachers has a negatively correlation r = -. 27. The study also showed the lowest correlation of r= .044, p <.01 is the dimension of defining and disseminating information on the school.
format Thesis
qualification_name masters
qualification_level Master's degree
author Zabariah, Saad
author_facet Zabariah, Saad
author_sort Zabariah, Saad
title Kepimpinan pengajaran pengetua dan hubungannya dengan komitmen guru-guru sekolah menengah di Daerah Samarahan, Sarawak
title_short Kepimpinan pengajaran pengetua dan hubungannya dengan komitmen guru-guru sekolah menengah di Daerah Samarahan, Sarawak
title_full Kepimpinan pengajaran pengetua dan hubungannya dengan komitmen guru-guru sekolah menengah di Daerah Samarahan, Sarawak
title_fullStr Kepimpinan pengajaran pengetua dan hubungannya dengan komitmen guru-guru sekolah menengah di Daerah Samarahan, Sarawak
title_full_unstemmed Kepimpinan pengajaran pengetua dan hubungannya dengan komitmen guru-guru sekolah menengah di Daerah Samarahan, Sarawak
title_sort kepimpinan pengajaran pengetua dan hubungannya dengan komitmen guru-guru sekolah menengah di daerah samarahan, sarawak
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department College of Arts and Sciences (CAS)
publishDate 2011
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/4306/1/s805324.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4306/13/s805324_abstract.pdf
_version_ 1747827709984112640
spelling my-uum-etd.43062016-04-28T00:54:17Z Kepimpinan pengajaran pengetua dan hubungannya dengan komitmen guru-guru sekolah menengah di Daerah Samarahan, Sarawak 2011 Zabariah, Saad Mustafa, Ismail College of Arts and Sciences (CAS) College of Arts and Sciences LB2801-3095 School administration and organization The purpose of the study is to determine the leadership style of principals of secondary school in District of Samarahan, Sarawak and their influence on teachers commitment. The cross-sectional survey method using standardized-item questionnaires was employed in this study. The respondents consist of 260 teachers choosen randomly from 8 schools in District of Samarahan, Sarawak. The Instructional Leadership Survey Questionnaire by Lahui-Ako (2001) was used to measure the dimensions of Instructional leadership. While the Diagnostic Assessment of School and Principal Effectiveness (DASPE) by Ebmeier (1990) was used to measure teachers' commitment in school. Four null hypotheses were developed and tested using t-test, Anova and Pearson correlation. The finding of the study showed that instructional leadership influenced by a simple commitment of teachers, especially in the dimensions of promoting a positive learning environment that is r=.31, p <.01, while the dimensions of monitoring and providing feedback to teachers has a negatively correlation r = -. 27. The study also showed the lowest correlation of r= .044, p <.01 is the dimension of defining and disseminating information on the school. 2011 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/4306/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/4306/1/s805324.pdf text eng validuser https://etd.uum.edu.my/4306/13/s805324_abstract.pdf text eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Ary, D., Jacobs, LC., Razaveigh, A. (2002). Introduction to research in education (6th ed.). Wadsworth:Thomson Learning. Bass, B.M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press. Bevoise, W.D. (1984). Synthesis of research on the principal as the instructional leadership. Educational Leadership. 15-20. Blasé, J., & Blasé, J. (2000). Effective instructional leadership: Teachers' perspectives on how principal promote teaching and learning in schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 38(2), 130-141. Braskamp, L. A., & Maehr, M.L. (1988). Instructional Climate Inventory: Form 5. Champagne, IL: Metri Tech. Brookover, W.B., & Lezotte, L.W. (1979). Changes in school characteristics coincident with changes in students achievement. East Lansing: Michigan State University, Institute for Research on Teaching. Buchanan, B. (1974). "Building Organizational Commitment: The Socialization of Work Managers in work Organizations." Administrative Science Quarterly, 19, 533-546. Ciculla, J.B. (1995). Leadership ethics: Mapping the territory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 5(1), 5-8. Davis, G.A., & Thomas, M.A. (1989). Effective schools and effective teachers. Boston: Ally and Bacon. DeBevoise, W. (1984). Synthesis of research on principal as instructional leader. Educational Leadership, 41(5), 14-21. Drake, T.L. & Roe, W.H. 1994. The principalship. Ed. Ke 4. New York. Macmillan. Duke, D.L. (1987). School Leadership and Instructional Improvement. New York: Random House. Ebmeier, H. (1990). Diagnostic assessment of school and principal effectiveness. Topeka, KS: United School Administrators. Ebmeier, H. (2003). How supervision influences teacher efficacy and commitment: An investigation of a path model. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 18(2), 110-141. Edmonds, R 1979. Effective school improvement: An overview. Educational Leadership 37. Edmonds, R. 1979. Effective schools for Thee Urban Poor. Educational Leadership. 37(1): 15-18 & 20-24. Firestones, W. A, & Pannell, J. (1993). Teacher commitment, working conditions, and differential incentives. Review of Educational Research, 63(4), 489-526. Geijsel, F., Sleegers, p., Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2002). Transformational leadership effects on Teachers' commitment and effort toward school reform. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(3), 228-256. Glickman, C. D. 1993. Renewing America's school: a guide for school-bared action. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Gordon, P.H., Socket, H. & Hoyle, E. 1983. Is Teaching a profession. Bedford Way Papers, University of London, U.K. Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1985) Assessing the instructional management behaviour of principals. The Elementary School Journal, 86(2), 217- 247. Hallinger, P., & P., & Heck, R (1996). Reassessing the principal's role in school effectiveness: a Review of empirical research, 1980-1995. Educational Administration Quarterly 32(1), 5-44. Hallinger, P. (2003) Leading educational change: Reflection on the practice of instructional and ransformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 329-352. Hallinger, P. (2005b) Instructional leadership and the school principal: a passing fancy that refuses to fade away. Leadership and Policy in School, 4, 221-239. Hamzah Md. Omar et al. 1996. Peranan guru pendamping terhadap guru pelatih Maktab Perguruan Tuanku Bainun semasa praktikum 1/95. Seminar Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Bahagian Pendidikan Guru. Pulau Pinang. 19-12 Dis. Hair, JF., Money, AH., Samouel, P., & Page, M (2007). Research method for business. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Heck, RH., Larsen, T. J., & Marcoulides, G. A (1990). Instructional leadership and school achievement: validation of a casual model. Educational Administration Quaterly, 26(2), 94-125. Hoy, W. K., & Mi skel, C. G. (2001). Educational Admistration: Theory, research and practice (6th ed) New York: McGraw Hill. Hussein Mahmood 1993. Kepimpinan dan Keberkesanan Sekolah. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa Pustaka. Ibrahim Mamat. 2001. Pengetua sekolah menangani isu dan cabaran kepimpinan. Ed. Ke-2. Subang Jaya: Kumpulan Budiman Sdn. Bhd. Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (1987). Surat Pekeliling Ikhtisas, 3/1987. Kementerian PeIajaran Malaysia. (2006). Pelan Induk Pembangunan Pendidikan (2006-2010). Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia: Edisi Pelancaran. Kingstrom, P. O., & Mainstone, L. E. (1985) An investigation of the rater-ratee acquaintance and rater bias. Academy of Management Journal, 28(3), 641-653. Krejcie, R.V. & Morgan, D.W. 1970. Determine sample size of research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 30(3): 607-610. Krug, S.E. (1992). Instructional leadership: A constructivist perspective. Educational Administrative Quarterly, 28(3), 5-42. Kushman, J.W. (1992). The 0rganizational dynamics of teacher workplace commitment: A study of urban elementary and middle schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 28(1), 5-42. Lahui-Ako, B. (2001). The instructional leadership behaviour of Papua New Guinea high school principal- A provincial case study. Journal of Educational Administration 39(3), 233-265. LaMastro, V. (2000). Commitment and perceived organizational support. National Forum of Applied Educational Research Journal, 13E(3). Dicapai pada April 11, 2007 daripada http:/www.national- forum.com. Leithwood, K. (1992). Transfromational leadership: fire does it stand? Educational Leadership, 49, 8-12. Leithwood, K A, Begley, P.T., & Cousins, J.B. (1994). Developing Expert Leadership for Future Schools. The Palmer Press, London. Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., & Steinbach, R. (2002). Leadership practices for accountable schools. Dlm K. Leithwood., P. Hallinger (eds), Second International Handbook of Educational Leadership And Administration Part 2, 849-879. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2005). A review of transformational school leadership research 1996-2005. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4, 177-199. Malaysia. (2005). Akta Pendidikan 1996. Petaling Jaya. _Intetnational Law Book. Marks, H. M., & Printy, S. M. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: an intergration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly. 39(3), 370-397. Meyer, J.P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three- component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61-89. Mohd. Sahandri Gani B. Hamzah, Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan Jurnal Pendidik dan Penyelidikan, Ji1. 20, 53-68, 2005. Mortimore, P. (1995). Key characteristics of effective schools. Kertas kerja dalam Seminar Sekolah Efektif. IAB, Genting Highland, 28 Oktober. Mowday, RT., Porter, L.W, & Steers, RM (1982). employee- organization linkages: The psychology of Commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. New York: Academic Press. Mowday, RT., Steers, RM, & Porter, L.W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 14, 224-247. Murphy, J. (2002). Reculturing the profession of educational leadership: New blueprints. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(2), 176-192. Quinn, D. M. (2002). Be impact of principal leadership behaviours on instructional practice and student engagement. Journal of Education Administration, 40(5), 447-467. Reyes, P. (1992). Preliminary models of teacher organizational commmitment: Implications for Restructuring the workplace. Report number R117Q05-92. Centre on Organization and Restructuring of Schools, Medison, WI. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED349680). Ross, J. A, & Gray, P. (2004,April). Transformational leadership and teacher commitment to Organizational values: The mediating effects of collective teacher efficacy. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association in San Diego, CA. Rotter, J. 1975. Some problems and misconceptions related to the construction of internal versus external control of reinforcement. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 43: 56-67. Salkind, N. J. (2000). Exploring research (4th ed). New Jersey Prentice Hall. Sekaran, U. (2005). Research methods for business: a skill-building approach (4th ed). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Sergiovanni, T. J. (1992). Moral Leadership: Getting to the heart of school improvement. San Francisco: Jossey Bass. Sergiovanni, T. J. (2001). The principalship: A reflective practice perspective (4th ed) Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Shahril@Charil Marzuki (1997). Kajian Sekolah Berkesan di Malaysia: Model Lima Faktor. Tesis PbD. Tidak diterbitkan. Fakulti Pendidikan. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Shahril@Charil Marzuki (2000). Pendidikan di Malaysia masa kini. Kertas kerja Seminar Pendidikan. Universiti Malaya. 15 April. Shahril@Charil Marzuki. 2001. Ciri-ciri kepimpinan pengetua/guru besar yang dapat menghadapi cabaran dan harapan pada abad ke 21 ini. Jurnal Institut Pengetua. Shimniok, L.M., & Schmoker, M. (1992). How we made the transition from junior high to middle school. Educational leadership, 49(5), 27-29. Singh, K., & Billingsley, B.S. (1998). Professional support and its effect on teachers' commitment. Journal of Educational Research, 91(4), 229-239. Southworth, G. (2002). Instructional leadership in schools: reflections and empirical evidence. School Leadership and Management, 22(1), 73-91. Smyth, J. (1987). Critical Perspective On Educational leadership. New York: The Farmer Press. Stringfield, E, & Teddlie, C. (1988). A time to summarise: The Louisana School Effectiveness Study. Educational Leadership, 46(2), 43-49. Reichers, A. E. (1995). A review and re conceptualization of organizational commitment. Academy of Management Review, 10, 465-476. Reyes, P. (1990) Teacher and their workplace: Commitment, performance and productivity: Newbury Park, C A: Sage. Tang Keow Ngang. 2000. Kepimpinan pengajaran pengetua dan guru besar di sekolah-sekolah Zon Ampang. Tesis Sajana Sains, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk-Hoy, W.K. (2001). Teacher Efficacy: Capturing and Elusive Construct. Teaching and Teacher Educational. 17: 783-805. Ubben, G.C., & Hughes, I. W. (1992). The principal: Creative leadership for effective schools (2nd ed) Needham Heights MA: Allyn & Bacon. Walker. A (1994). Teams in Schools: International Journal of Education Management. 08.4 38-44. Webb R (2005). Leading teaching and learning in the primary school: From educative leadership to Pedagogical leadership. Educational Management Administrative and Leadership, 33(2), 69-91. Weber, J.R (1997). Leading the instructional program In Smith, S-C., Piele, P.K. (Eds), School Leadership: Handbook for Excellence, (3rd ed.). Educational Resources Information Centre, Clearinghouse on Educational Management. Eugene, Oregon. 253-278. Yukl, G. (2006). Leadership in Organizations (6th ed). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Similar Items