Impak perlaksanaan otonomi daerah kepada sistem penyampaian perkhidmatan awam di Kabupaten Kutai Kartanegara
The quality of public service delivery in Indonesia is often reported to be very low. Bad practices in the public service such as favouritism, corruption and poor service to the community always occur. As a result of these weaknesses there is a negative impact on public sector in Indonesia. Despite...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Thesis |
Language: | eng eng |
Published: |
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://etd.uum.edu.my/4397/1/s94515.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/4397/7/s94515_abstract.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The quality of public service delivery in Indonesia is often reported to be very low. Bad practices in the public service such as favouritism, corruption and poor service to the community always occur. As a result of these weaknesses there is a negative impact on public sector in Indonesia. Despite the many efforts made to improve the quality of public service delivery, it has still failed. Therefore, the main objective of this study is to examine the quality of public service delivery and public satisfaction in the Kutai Kartanegara Regency. This study is important because the quality of public service delivery is one of the indicators of success in the implementation of regional autonomy. This study used quantitative method. A total of 1300 questionnaires were distributed to respondents in the 13 government departments in the Kutai Kartanegara Regency. This study found that the community satisfaction
in the Kutai Kartanegara Regency on public service delivery was moderate. The study also found that the main factors influencing public satisfaction on public service delivery in the Kutai Kartanegara Regency were accessibility, reliability, responsiveness and delivery. This study proposes that a systematic and continuous
effort is made to improve the quality of public service delivery in the Kutai Kartanegara Regency. In addition, the factors that have minimal impact on community satisfaction such as empathy, timeliness and assurance should also continue to be improved and enhanced. |
---|