Pengurusan Kualiti Pelajar Bagi Pasaran Kerjaya Alaf Baru

During this era of globalization and as the world moves into the next millennium, ‘quality’ is the catchword that provides the competitive edge in every field of human endeavor. This is certainly of great importance in the field of education. To enable a country attain advancement and development it...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Zarina, Mat Zin
Format:	Thesis
Language:	eng eng
Published:	1999
Subjects:	LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
Online Access:	https://etd.uum.edu.my/444/1/ZARINA_MAT_ZIN_-_Pengurusan_Kualiti_Pelajar_Bagi_Pasaran_Kerjaya_Alaf_Baru.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/444/2/1.ZARINA_MAT_ZIN_-_Pengurusan_Kualiti_Pelajar_Bagi_Pasaran_Kerjaya_Alaf_Baru.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-uum-etd.444
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection	UUM ETD
language	eng eng
topic	LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
spellingShingle	LB2801-3095 School administration and organization Zarina, Mat Zin Pengurusan Kualiti Pelajar Bagi Pasaran Kerjaya Alaf Baru
description	During this era of globalization and as the world moves into the next millennium, ‘quality’ is the catchword that provides the competitive edge in every field of human endeavor. This is certainly of great importance in the field of education. To enable a country attain advancement and development it needs intellectuals who are capable of coming out with new discoveries and inventions. The question is, to what extent the educational institutions could successfully produce quality students through the public examinations? Quality and quantity is closely related with the mission or the aim fixed by school administrators. Therefore, the objective of this research is to determine the approach used by the school administrators in fixing their respective aims. Besides, this research is also to determine the level of achievement of the quality students based on the categorization used. A total of 14 schools were chosen and the actual Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia results were used as the data for the research. Basic statistical techniques such as percentage and frequency were used to analyse the data. The findings of this research showed that for the duration of seven years, 17.4% used the high value return combination and 82.6% used the average value return. Out of the 82.6% of average value return 26.1% is categorized as unsuitable combination. On the whole, this research found that the quality output is still at a low level, at approximately 24.5% and that schools are still using the traditional approach in determining the aims of the school. Therefore, it is hoped that this research findings would provide additional information especially to the Ministry of Education so as future paradigm shift of educational aims would be more quality oriented.
format	Thesis
qualification_name	masters
qualification_level	Master's degree
author	Zarina, Mat Zin
author_facet	Zarina, Mat Zin
author_sort	Zarina, Mat Zin
title	Pengurusan Kualiti Pelajar Bagi Pasaran Kerjaya Alaf Baru
title_short	Pengurusan Kualiti Pelajar Bagi Pasaran Kerjaya Alaf Baru
title_full	Pengurusan Kualiti Pelajar Bagi Pasaran Kerjaya Alaf Baru
title_fullStr	Pengurusan Kualiti Pelajar Bagi Pasaran Kerjaya Alaf Baru
title_full_unstemmed	Pengurusan Kualiti Pelajar Bagi Pasaran Kerjaya Alaf Baru
title_sort	pengurusan kualiti pelajar bagi pasaran kerjaya alaf baru
granting_institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department	Sekolah Siswazah
publishDate	1999
url	https://etd.uum.edu.my/444/1/ZARINA_MAT_ZIN_-_Pengurusan_Kualiti_Pelajar_Bagi_Pasaran_Kerjaya_Alaf_Baru.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/444/2/1.ZARINA_MAT_ZIN_-_Pengurusan_Kualiti_Pelajar_Bagi_Pasaran_Kerjaya_Alaf_Baru.pdf
_version_	1747826916386144256
spelling	my-uum-etd.4442013-07-24T12:07:18Z Pengurusan Kualiti Pelajar Bagi Pasaran Kerjaya Alaf Baru 1999 Zarina, Mat Zin Sekolah Siswazah Graduate School LB2801-3095 School administration and organization During this era of globalization and as the world moves into the next millennium, ‘quality’ is the catchword that provides the competitive edge in every field of human endeavor. This is certainly of great importance in the field of education. To enable a country attain advancement and development it needs intellectuals who are capable of coming out with new discoveries and inventions. The question is, to what extent the educational institutions could successfully produce quality students through the public examinations? Quality and quantity is closely related with the mission or the aim fixed by school administrators. Therefore, the objective of this research is to determine the approach used by the school administrators in fixing their respective aims. Besides, this research is also to determine the level of achievement of the quality students based on the categorization used. A total of 14 schools were chosen and the actual Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia results were used as the data for the research. Basic statistical techniques such as percentage and frequency were used to analyse the data. The findings of this research showed that for the duration of seven years, 17.4% used the high value return combination and 82.6% used the average value return. Out of the 82.6% of average value return 26.1% is categorized as unsuitable combination. On the whole, this research found that the quality output is still at a low level, at approximately 24.5% and that schools are still using the traditional approach in determining the aims of the school. Therefore, it is hoped that this research findings would provide additional information especially to the Ministry of Education so as future paradigm shift of educational aims would be more quality oriented. 1999 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/444/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/444/1/ZARINA_MAT_ZIN_-_Pengurusan_Kualiti_Pelajar_Bagi_Pasaran_Kerjaya_Alaf_Baru.pdf application/pdf eng validuser https://etd.uum.edu.my/444/2/1.ZARINA_MAT_ZIN_-_Pengurusan_Kualiti_Pelajar_Bagi_Pasaran_Kerjaya_Alaf_Baru.pdf application/pdf eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Abdullah Ismail . 1992. Cabaran-cabaran Dalam Membawa Pendidikan Berkualiti Kepada Pelajar-Pelajar Luar Bandar: Kajian Kes Sekolah Menengah Raja Tun Uda. Kertas kerja Seminar Nasional Ke 2 Pengurusan Pendidikan Berkualiti Abad 21. Genting Highland: Institut Aminuddin Baki. Ahmad Mohamad Said, 1993. Wawasan 2020: Model Pembangunan Negara Dan Implikasi Pendidikan, Jurnal Guru, Mei : (332-348). Brady L. 1992. Curriculum Development. Sydney : Prentice Hall . Campbell R.F., Cornally J.E., dan Nystrand R.O. 1983. Introduction To Education Administration. Edisi ke-6. Massachusette: Allyn and Bacon Inc. Crosby,P.B. 1979. Quality Is Pee. New York: New American Library. Deming, W.Edwards. Improvement of Quality and Productivity Through Action by Management. National Productivity Review. l(l):(Winter 1981-1982). Garvin, D. A. 1988. Quality On The Line. Harvard Business Review. (May-June):63-73. Hanafi Kamal . 1980. An Identification of The Desirable Behavior Domains Of The Secondary School Principalship in Malaysia. Tesis Ph.D, Ohio University. Athens. Koontz. 1980. The Management Thoery Jungle Revisited. Academy of Management 5(2): 175-187. Hassan Mohamad . 1992. Pengurusan Pendidikan Ke Arah Kecemerlangan Sekolah Menengah: Kes Sekolah Menengah Kangkung. Kertas kerja Seminar Nasional Ke 2 Pengurusan Pendidikan Berkualiti Abad 21. Genting Highland : Institut Aminuddin Baki. Hussein Ahmad . 1993. Pendidikan Dan Masyarakat: Antara Dasar, Reformasi dan Wawasan. Kuala Lumpur : Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Hussein Ahmad : 1995. Menangani Pendemokrasian Pendidikan Dahm Era Globalisasi: Strategi Reformasi, Kesinambungan Dan Perubahan. Program Siri Bicara. Genting Highland : Institut Aminuddin Baki. Jabatan Perangkaan Malaysia. 1998. Buletin Perangkaan Sosial Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur. Jabatan Perangkaan Malaysia. 1999. Siaran Perangkaan Bulanan Malaysia. Edisi Februari. Kuala Lumpur. James A.F. Stoner dan Charles Wankel . 1985. Management. New York : Prentice-Hall Inc.. Juran, J M. 1980. Quality Planning and Analysis. 2nd edition. New York : Mc-Graw-Hill. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. 1979. Laporan Jawatankuasa Kabinet Mengkaji Perlaksanaan Dasar Pelajaran. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. 1998. Panduan Pemilihan Mata Pelajaran Dalam Konteks Persijilan Terbuka. 23 Oktober. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. 1999. Panduan Pemilihan Mata Pelajaran Elektif KBSM. Kuala Lumpur : Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum. [http://www.ppk.kpm.my/kerjaya/2b.htm] [4/8/99] Kerajaan Malaysia. 1991. Rangka Rancangan Jangka Panjang Ke Dua 1991-2000. Khairul Anwar Khairuddin. 1992. Pengurusan Pendidikan Ke Arah Kecemerlangan Sekolah Menengah : Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Sekolah Menengah Kangkung. Kertas kerja Seminar Nasional Ke 2 Pengurusan Pendidikan Berkualiti Abad 21. Genting Highland : Institut Aminuddin Baki. Krajewski , Ritzman . 1996. Operations Management: Strategy and Analysis. United States : Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Inc. Lunenburg, F.C. 1995. The Principalship: Concepts and Applications. United States : Prentice Hall. Luthans,F.I,. 1976. Introduction To Management : A Contigency Approach. New York : Mc Graw-Hill Book Co. Maier N.R.F. 1963. Problem Solving Discussions and Conferences : Leadership Methods and Skills. New York : McGraw-Hill Book Co. Mahathir Mohamad, 1991. Malaysia: The Way Forward. Kertas kerja Majlis Perdagangan Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur. Mathur Kamlesh dan Daniel Solow: 1994. Management Science : The Art of Decision Making. New Jersey : Prentice Hall. Mawardi Abdullah . 1992. Pengurusan Pendidikan Melalui Perspektif Ekonomi Kertas kerja Seminar Nasional Ke 2 Pengurusan Pendidikan Berkualiti Abad 21. Genting Highland : Institut Aminuddin Baki. Mayhew, I.B., Patrik, J.F., Hubbard, D.L. 1990. The Quest For Quality: The Challenge for Undergraduate Education in the 1990s. Oxford : Jossey-Bass Publishers. Montebello, A.R. 1995. Work Teams That Work: Skills For Managing Across The Organization. Petaling Jaya : Advantage Quest Publications. Newman W.H. 1963. Administrative Action. New Jersey : Prentice-Hall Inc. Philip Kotler dan rakan-rakan. 1996. Marketing Management : An Asian Perspective. Singapore : Prentice Hall. Robbins S.P. 1972. Management : Conceptional Practices. New Jersey : Prentice-Hall Inc. Robbins, S.P. . 1995. Supervision Today!. New Jersey : Prentice Hall- Englewood Cliffs. Robiah Sidin. 1995. Graduate Job Opportunities in the 1990s. Career Guidance. 5(2):18-19. Robiah Sidin. 1998. Pemikiran Dalam Pendidikan. Shah Alam : Fajar Bakti Sdn. Bhd. Shahril Marzuki, Zainun Ishak, Lge Pau Wing, Saedah Siraj. 1993. Pendidikan Di Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur:Utusan Publications & Distributors Sdn. Bhd. Thandi H.S. 1977. The Relationship Between Principles Professional Teacher's Feeling In Malaysian Schools. Tesis Ph.D Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Malaya. Wan Mohd Zahid Mohd Noordin. 1992. Arah Aliran Pendidikan Sains Dalarn Konteks Reformasi Pendidikan dalam Ucapan Utama Seminar Pendidikan Tinggi Sains: Ke Arah Reformasi. Kuala Lumpur : Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Yusuf Hanifa: 1981. Organizational Commitment, Teachers Attitudes In The Context Of Peninsular Malaysia. Tesis kedoktoran. Stanford University. Zaidatol Akmaliah Lope Pihie . 1990. Pentadbiran Pendidikan. Petaling Jaya : Penerbit Fajar Bakti Sdn.Bhd. pl-p26, p84-p94. Zainol Abidin Abdul Rashid : 1992. Manusia Pada Abad 21: Pembangunan Sumber Tenaga Manusia. Kertas Seminar Pendidikan Tinggi Sains: Ke Arah Reformasi. Kuala Lumpur : Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Pengurusan Kualiti Pelajar Bagi Pasaran Kerjaya Alaf Baru

Similar Items