Kajian persepsi ke atas kemudahan ameniti di kawasan perumahan kos rendah : Kajian kes di Negeri Pulau Pinang

Community amenities are the important element in a residential area which provides an opportunity for local residents to interact and communicate. Provision of community amenities in low cost housing areas often overlooked by some developers in Malaysia. This study was conducted to get an overview o...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Beh, Sang How
Format:	Thesis
Language:	eng eng
Published:	2014
Subjects:	HM Sociology.
Online Access:	https://etd.uum.edu.my/4455/1/s803064.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/4455/2/s803064_abstract.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-uum-etd.4455
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection	UUM ETD
language	eng eng
advisor	Salleh, Dani
topic	HM Sociology.
spellingShingle	HM Sociology. Beh, Sang How Kajian persepsi ke atas kemudahan ameniti di kawasan perumahan kos rendah : Kajian kes di Negeri Pulau Pinang
description	Community amenities are the important element in a residential area which provides an opportunity for local residents to interact and communicate. Provision of community amenities in low cost housing areas often overlooked by some developers in Malaysia. This study was conducted to get an overview of the perceptions of residents on community amenities in Pangsapuri Pelangi and Flat Teluk Indah, Pulau Pinang. A total of 720 respondents were randomly selected. Primary information was obtained through questionnaires, while secondary information through books, thesis,Carticles and research reports. The results showed that most of the respondents were satisfied with the community amenities provided and they frequently use the facilities. Study also found that the facilities such as community hall, religion facilities, kindergarten, school and children playground have been operated and maintained in both study areas. Significantly, majority of the residents in both study areas Pangsapuri Pelangi and Flat Teluk Indah agreed that the facilities has influenced social interaction and enable them to interact and communicate among the community members besides creating patriotism among the residents who were active in the programme. As conclusion, the study proposed an appropriate facilities design guideline has to be properly outlined so that the provision of community amenities can be provided efficiently.
format	Thesis
qualification_name	masters
qualification_level	Master's degree
author	Beh, Sang How
author_facet	Beh, Sang How
author_sort	Beh, Sang How
title	Kajian persepsi ke atas kemudahan ameniti di kawasan perumahan kos rendah : Kajian kes di Negeri Pulau Pinang
title_short	Kajian persepsi ke atas kemudahan ameniti di kawasan perumahan kos rendah : Kajian kes di Negeri Pulau Pinang
title_full	Kajian persepsi ke atas kemudahan ameniti di kawasan perumahan kos rendah : Kajian kes di Negeri Pulau Pinang
title_fullStr	Kajian persepsi ke atas kemudahan ameniti di kawasan perumahan kos rendah : Kajian kes di Negeri Pulau Pinang
title_full_unstemmed	Kajian persepsi ke atas kemudahan ameniti di kawasan perumahan kos rendah : Kajian kes di Negeri Pulau Pinang
title_sort	kajian persepsi ke atas kemudahan ameniti di kawasan perumahan kos rendah : kajian kes di negeri pulau pinang
granting_institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department	College of Law, Government and International Studies (COLGIS)
publishDate	2014
url	https://etd.uum.edu.my/4455/1/s803064.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/4455/2/s803064_abstract.pdf
_version_	1747827739938783232
spelling	my-uum-etd.44552022-10-19T01:10:47Z Kajian persepsi ke atas kemudahan ameniti di kawasan perumahan kos rendah : Kajian kes di Negeri Pulau Pinang 2014 Beh, Sang How Salleh, Dani College of Law, Government and International Studies (COLGIS) College of Law, Goverment and International Studies (COLGIS) HM Sociology. Community amenities are the important element in a residential area which provides an opportunity for local residents to interact and communicate. Provision of community amenities in low cost housing areas often overlooked by some developers in Malaysia. This study was conducted to get an overview of the perceptions of residents on community amenities in Pangsapuri Pelangi and Flat Teluk Indah, Pulau Pinang. A total of 720 respondents were randomly selected. Primary information was obtained through questionnaires, while secondary information through books, thesis,Carticles and research reports. The results showed that most of the respondents were satisfied with the community amenities provided and they frequently use the facilities. Study also found that the facilities such as community hall, religion facilities, kindergarten, school and children playground have been operated and maintained in both study areas. Significantly, majority of the residents in both study areas Pangsapuri Pelangi and Flat Teluk Indah agreed that the facilities has influenced social interaction and enable them to interact and communicate among the community members besides creating patriotism among the residents who were active in the programme. As conclusion, the study proposed an appropriate facilities design guideline has to be properly outlined so that the provision of community amenities can be provided efficiently. 2014 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/4455/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/4455/1/s803064.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/4455/2/s803064_abstract.pdf text eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Aaronson, D. (2000). A note on the benefits of homeownership. Journal of Urban Economics. Abbas Yusuf (1991). Persepsi pelajar terhadap peranan guru bimbingan dan kaunseling di Negeri Pontianak Indonesia, Tesis, Master Sains, Serdang, UPM. Abrahim Maslow (1954). Motivation and personality. Adriaanse, C. C. M. (2007). Measuring residential satisfaction: a residential environmental satisfaction scale (RESS). Journal of Housing Build Environment. Ahmad Shukri Mohd Nain (2002). Tingkah laku organisasi : Pengenalan tingkah laku individu, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Amerigo, M., & Aragones, J. M. (1997). A theoretical and methodological approach to the study of residential satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Psychology. Amole, D. (2009). Residential satisfaction in student housing. Journal of Environmental Psychology. Barcus, H. R. (2004). Urban-rural migration in the USA: an analysis of residential satisfaction. Regional Studies, 38(6). Barnett, V. (1991). Sample survey: Principles and methods. London: Hodder. Baum, S., Arthurson, K., & Rickson, K. (2010). Happy people in mixed-up places: the association between the degree and type of local socioeconomic mix and expressions of neighborhood satisfaction. Urban Studies. Chapman, D.W., & Lombard, J. R. (2006). Determinants of neighborhood satisfaction on fee-based gated and non-gated communities. Urban Affair Review. Cook, C. C. (1988). Components of neighborhood satisfaction: responses from urban and suburban single-parent women. Environment and Behavior, 20(2). Crowder, K.D., & South, S. J. (2003). Neighborhood distress and school dropout: the variable significance of community context. Social Science Research. Dusansky, R., & Koc, C. (2007). The capital gains effect in the demand for housing. Journal of Urban Economics. Elsinga, M., & Hoekstra, J. (2005). Homeownership and housing satisfaction. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment. Ebernerzer Howard (1948). Garden cities of tomorrow. Fatimah Abdullah dan Noraziah Ali (2004). Penunjuk kesejahteraan isi rumah dan keluarga. Dalam : A. Latiff, Pereira, J.J., A.Hezri Adnan and Aldrie, E.E. (eds) Indicators of Sustainable Development. Assessing Changes in Environmental Conditions, Institut Alam Sekitar dan Pembangunan (LESTARI), UKM, Bangi. Habsah binti Hashim dan Yusfida Ayu binti Abdullah @ Mohd Zain (2005). Kemudahan masyarakat dan sistem sokongan keluarga di peringkat kejiranan. Kajian kes : Bandaraya Shah Alam. Hipp, J. (2010). What is the ‘neighborhood’ in neighborhood satisfaction? Comparing the effects of structural characteristics measured at the microneighborhood and trace levels. Urban Studies. Husna Sulaiman dan Nurizan Yahya (1987). Housing provision and statistisfaction of low income households in Kuala Lumpur, Habitat International, 13(4): 63-69. Hutchison, N. E. (1994). Housing as an investment? A comparison of returns from housing with other types of investment. Journal of Property Finance, 5(2). Ibrahim Wahab (1991). Housing strategies in Malaysia. Jabatan Perancangan Bandar dan Desa Negeri Selangor (2010). Manual garis panduan & piawaian perancangan negeri Selangor (Edisi Kedua). Jabatan Perancangan Bandar dan Desa Semenanjung Malaysia (2006). Dasar perbandaran negara (DPN). Jabatan Perancangan Bandar dan Desa Semenanjung Malaysia (2010). Rancangan fizikal negara Ke-2 (RFN Ke-2). Jabatan Perancangan Bandar dan Desa Semenanjung Malaysia (2013). Garis panduan perancangan kemudahan masyarakat. Jabatan Perancangan Bandar dan Desa Semenanjung Malaysia (2013). Garis panduan perancangan perumahan. Jabatan Perangkaan Malaysia (1980). Laporan banci populasi dan perumahan. Jabatan Perpaduan Negara dan Integrasi Nasional (2011). Laporan tahunan isu keharmonian masyarakat tahunan, Bahagian Pengurusan Perpaduan. Jabatan Perpaduan Negara dan Integrasi Nasional (2012). Laporan tahunan isu keharmonian masyarakat tahunan, Bahagian Pengurusan Perpaduan. Jabatan Perumahan Negara (1998). Artikel garis panduan perancangan dan rekabentuk perumahan kos rendah (Bagi semua jenis rumah kecuali rumah pangsa). Jabatan Perumahan Negara (2011). Dasar perumahan negara (DRN). Jalaludin Rakhmad (2004). Psikologi Komunikasi. Nur Jasmine Lau Leby (2008) Residents’ perception of liveable neighbourhood environment in Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia (Master sains thesis). Universiti Putra Malaysia. James A. Emanuel (1973). Issues of regional policies, organisation for economic cooperation and development, Paris. Kaitilla, S. (1993). Satisfaction with public housing in Papua New Guinea. Environment and Behavior, 25(4). Kamus Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka Edisi Keempat (2005). Katiman Rostam dan Wan Maimunah Wan Ismail (1997). Pola interaksi sosial di kawasan perumahan terancang di Bandar Baru Bangi, Akademik 50 : 25-41. Jabatan Geografi, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Kellekc, O. L., & Berkoz, L. (2006). Mass housing: user satisfaction in housing and its environment in Istanbul. European Journal of Housing Policy, 6(1). Kementerian Kewangan (2011). Laporan ekonomi 2010/2011. Kementerian Perumahan dan Kerajaan Tempatan (2002). Garis panduan pelaksanaan harga baru rumah kos rendah (Pindaan 2002). Khana, E., Lovegreen, L., Khana, B., & Khana, M. (2003). Person, environment, and person-environment fit as influences on residential satisfaction of elders. Environment and Behavior. Larry S. Bourne (1981). The geography of housing. Lawrence, R.J. (1995). Housing quality : An agenda for research, Urban studies, 32(11): 1155-1664. Lembaga Dalam Hasil Negara 2002. Penerangan mengenai perintah duti setem (pengecualian) (No.39) 2002 [P.U.(A) 425/2002] pembelian rumah kos rendah daripada pemaju atau selepas 1 Julai 2002. Lien, H. M., Wu, W. C., & Lin, C. C. (2008). New evidence on the link between housing environment and children’s educational attainments. Journal of Urban Economics. Lu, M. (1999). Determinants of residential satisfaction: ordered logit vs regression models. Growth and Change. Majlis Bandaraya Shah Alam (MBSA) (2004). Garis panduan perancangan MBSA 2004, MBSA, Shah Alam, tidak diterbitkan. Malaysia. (1971). Second Malaysia plan, 1971-1975. Kuala Lumpur: Government Printer. Malaysia. (1976). Third Malaysia plan, 1976-1980. Kuala Lumpur: Government Printer. Malaysia. (1981). Fouth Malaysia plan, 1981-1985. Kuala Lumpur: Government Printer. Malaysia. (1986). Fifth Malaysia plan, 1986-1990. Kuala Lumpur: Government Printer. Malaysia. (1991). Sixth Malaysia plan, 1991-1995. Kuala Lumpur: Government Printer. Malaysia. (1996). Fifth Malaysia plan, 1996-2000. Kuala Lumpur: Government Printer. Malaysia. (2001). Eight Malaysia plan, 2001-2005. Kuala Lumpur: Government Printer. Malaysia. (2006). Ninth Malaysia plan, 2006-2010. Kuala Lumpur: Government Printer. Mellor Wati Othman (1992). Permintaan dan penawaran perumahan Wilayah Persekutuan. UTM. Merriam S. B. (2002). Qualitative researching pratice, example of discussion and analysis, San Francisco. Ministry of Housing and Local Government. (2011). National housing policy. Kuala Lumpur: Government Printer. Mohd Razali Agus (1993). Keselesaan penghuni dan pilihan bakal pembeli perumahan kos rendah di Terengganu Darul Iman, laporan untuk Unit Perancang Ekonomi Negeri Terengganu Darul Iman, Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Malaysia. Morris, E.W., & Winter, M. (1975). A theory of family housing adjustment. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 37. Noor Sharifah Sultan Saidi dan Abu Salehak Musa (1998). Masalah sosial semasa : Apakah peranan jururancang bandar. Dalam Jurnal Amalm Bina, Mac 1998. Nurizan Yahya (1998). Kualiti perumahan dan kualiti hidup, Analisis, 5 (1&2): 133-149. Nurizan Yahya dan Halimah Ahmad (1993). Kepuasan dan defisit perumahan di rumah kos rendah Semenanjung Malaysia, Manusia dan Masyarakat 7: 3-20. Osward, F., Wahl, H.-W., Mollenkopf, H., & Schilling, O. (2003). Housing and life satisfaction of older adults in tow rural regions in Germany. Research on Aging, 2. Ogu, V. I. (2002). Urban residential satisfaction and the planning implications in a developing world context: the example of Benin City, Nigeria. International Planning Studies. Parkes, A., Kearns, A., & Atkinson, R. (2002). What makes people dissatisfied with their neighborhoods? Urban Studies, 39(13). Robert K. Yin (2003). Case study method. Rohe, W. M., & Steward, L. S. (1996). Homeownership and neighborhood stability. Housing Policy Debate, 7(1). Salleh, A. G. (2008). Neighborhood factors in private low-cost housing in Malaysia. Habitat International, 32. Shamsul, A.B. (2011). Kesepaduan dan kepelbagaian : Perpaduan di Malaysia sebagai work-in-progress. Institut Kajian Etnik. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Sheau Tsuey Chong (2006) It takes a village to raise a child: Building social capital in safe and cohesive neighbourhood. Fakulti Sains Sosial dan Kemasyarakatan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Siswono Yudohusodo (1991). Rumah untuk seluruh rakyat, Universitas Michigan. Soekanto, Soerjono (2005). Sosiologi suatu pengantar. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada. Sosiologi, Tim (2003). Sosiologi suatu kajian kehidupan masyarakat kelas I SMA, Jakarta: Yudhistira. Sulong Mohamad (1984). Perumahan awam kos rendah di Terengganu: Isu, masalah dan penerimaan masyarakat, Monograf 10, Fakulti Sains Kemasyarakatan dan Kemanusiaan, Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Susan Charles (1979). Housing economic, Macmillan, London. Sunaryo (2004). Psikologi untuk keperawatan, Jakarta. Tan, T. H. (2008). Determinants of homeownership in Malaysia. Habitat International, 32. Tan, T. H. (2010). The effects of housing characteristics on neighborhood stability of homeownership. International Journal of Business and Emerging Market, 2(3). Tan, T. H. (2011). Neighborhood preferences of house buyers: the case of Klang Valley, Malaysia. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, 4(1). Unit Perancang Ekonomi, Jabatan Perdana Menteri (2010). Rancangan Malaysia kesepuluh 2011-2015 (RMKe-10). Vera-Toscano, E., & Ateca-Amestoy, V. (2008). The relevance of social interactions on housing satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 86. Wan Halim Othman (1986). Perancangan dan pelaksanaan kegiatan kejiranan. Negara 9(1): 1-13. Yahaya Hj. Ahmad (1982). Persepsi pelajar-pelajar sekolah menengah terhadap perkhidmatan bimbingan dan kaunseling. Latihan imiah, Bangi, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Zainuddin Abdul Rahman (2000). Kemiskinan bandar dan permasalahan setinggan. Kertas kerja seminar pengawalan dan penempatan semula setinggan seluruh Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur. Anjuran Kementerian Perumahan dan Kerajaan Tempatan dan Universiti Sains Malaysia. Zakiyah Jamaluddin (1995). Kepuasan terhadap perumahan dan sistem perumahan berkonsepkan Islam (Sekolah Pembangunan Sosial, Universiti Utara Malaysia). Zakiyah Jamaluddin (1995). Penempatan semula setinggan melalui projek penswastaan : Kajian kes di Desa Pandan, Kuala Lumpur, Tesis MA, Jabatan Antropologi dan Sosiologi, Universiti Malaya.

Kajian persepsi ke atas kemudahan ameniti di kawasan perumahan kos rendah : Kajian kes di Negeri Pulau Pinang

Similar Items