Good governance and government sector performance at Majlis Perbandaran Seberang Perai

Good governance is a basic management principle to strengthen government administrations in partnership with stakeholders. This implies that government administrations shall continuously change and develop to a more open, transparent, accountable, equitable, cost-effective and responsive form of gov...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Caroline, Jim
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
Published: 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/4612/1/s811041.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4612/2/s811041_abstract.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.4612
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
advisor Mat, Norazuwa
topic JS Local government Municipal government
spellingShingle JS Local government Municipal government
Caroline, Jim
Good governance and government sector performance at Majlis Perbandaran Seberang Perai
description Good governance is a basic management principle to strengthen government administrations in partnership with stakeholders. This implies that government administrations shall continuously change and develop to a more open, transparent, accountable, equitable, cost-effective and responsive form of governance to gain trust from the public. This study intends as a guide to help personnel in the government sector to understand and apply common principles of good governance and performance at each level of the organization in order to bring about improvement. Through a quantitative approach, this study involved 1,890 staff from 15 departments of Majlis Perbandaran Seberang Perai (MPSP) aims to examine the relationship between good governance and performance. A total of 364 personnel responded to the survey. Analysis using software Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 20.0 has found five principles of good governance were significantly positive correlated with performance. Information and decision support was strongly correlated to the organizational performance while four other elements namely accountability, leadership, strategy management and performance monitoring and transparency were moderately correlated. A significant impact emphasized good governance principles are the key to enhance performance. It shows that good governance plays an important role in the allocation of resources and management staff to improve service delivery to the citizens. This will lead to building trust between government and citizen. A value added in the performance would also support and enhance the development and economy of the nation.
format Thesis
qualification_name masters
qualification_level Master's degree
author Caroline, Jim
author_facet Caroline, Jim
author_sort Caroline, Jim
title Good governance and government sector performance at Majlis Perbandaran Seberang Perai
title_short Good governance and government sector performance at Majlis Perbandaran Seberang Perai
title_full Good governance and government sector performance at Majlis Perbandaran Seberang Perai
title_fullStr Good governance and government sector performance at Majlis Perbandaran Seberang Perai
title_full_unstemmed Good governance and government sector performance at Majlis Perbandaran Seberang Perai
title_sort good governance and government sector performance at majlis perbandaran seberang perai
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business
publishDate 2015
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/4612/1/s811041.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4612/2/s811041_abstract.pdf
_version_ 1747827765363605504
spelling my-uum-etd.46122021-03-18T06:36:23Z Good governance and government sector performance at Majlis Perbandaran Seberang Perai 2015 Caroline, Jim Mat, Norazuwa Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business JS Local government Municipal government Good governance is a basic management principle to strengthen government administrations in partnership with stakeholders. This implies that government administrations shall continuously change and develop to a more open, transparent, accountable, equitable, cost-effective and responsive form of governance to gain trust from the public. This study intends as a guide to help personnel in the government sector to understand and apply common principles of good governance and performance at each level of the organization in order to bring about improvement. Through a quantitative approach, this study involved 1,890 staff from 15 departments of Majlis Perbandaran Seberang Perai (MPSP) aims to examine the relationship between good governance and performance. A total of 364 personnel responded to the survey. Analysis using software Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 20.0 has found five principles of good governance were significantly positive correlated with performance. Information and decision support was strongly correlated to the organizational performance while four other elements namely accountability, leadership, strategy management and performance monitoring and transparency were moderately correlated. A significant impact emphasized good governance principles are the key to enhance performance. It shows that good governance plays an important role in the allocation of resources and management staff to improve service delivery to the citizens. This will lead to building trust between government and citizen. A value added in the performance would also support and enhance the development and economy of the nation. 2015 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/4612/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/4612/1/s811041.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/4612/2/s811041_abstract.pdf text eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Ahmad, I. P., & Saad, F. (2012).Auditor-General report: Financial performances improved in 2011 (All Business Daily, The Malaysian Reserve). Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Alexander, J. A., & Lee, S. Y. D. (2006). Does governance matter? Board configuration and performance in not for profit hospitals. The Milbank Quarterly, 84(4), 733-758. Armstrong, E. (2002). Combating corruption for development: The rule of law, transparency and accountability. Retrieved from http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/ documents/un/unpan005786.pdf. Armstrong, E. (2005). Integrity, transparency and accountability in public administration: Recent trends, regional and international developments and emerging issues. United Nations: Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation Economic Committee. (2011). Good practice guide on public sector governance. Singapore: APEC. Atkinson, A. A., Waterhouse, J. H., & Wells, R. B. (1997). A stakeholder approach to strategic performance measurement. Sloan Management Review, 38(3), 25-37. Audit Commission United Kingdom. (2003). Corporate governance: Improvement and trust in local public services. London, England: CW Print Group Ltd. Australian National Audit Office. (1997). Applying principles and practice of corporate governance in budget funded agencies. Canberra, Australia: ANAO. Australian National Audit Office. (2003).Public sector governance: Better practice guide (Volume 1). Canberra, Australia: ANAO. Australian National Audit Office. (2004). The auditor-general report: Annual report of commonwealth of Australia. Canberra, Australia: ANAO. Australian Public Service Commission. (2005). Foundations of governance in the Australian public service. Canberra, Australia: APSC. Badawi, S. A. A. (2005). World Ethics and Integrity Forum on 28–29 April 2005: Special keynote address: Integrity is the basis of good governance. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Barrett, P. (1997). Corporate governance: P-S style. Australian Accountant, 30-31. Barrett, P. (1998). Proceedings of the Conference on Defence Audit and Program Evaluation Committee on August 28 1998: Corporate governance. Canberra, Australia: ANAO. Bartlett, M. S. 1954. A note on the multiplying factors for various x2 approximation. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B16, 296-298. Barton, A. D. (2006). Public sector accountability and commercial in confidence outsourcing contracts. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 19(2), 256. Bebchuk, L. A., Cohen, A., & Ferrell, A. (2004). What Matters in Corporate Governance? (Working Paper of Harvard Law School John M. Olin Center, Economics and Business Discussion Paper Series No. 491). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Law School and National Bureau of Economic Research. Berman, E., & Wang, X. H. (2000). Performance measurement in U.S. countries. Public Administration Review, 60(5), 409-420. Blanchard, O. (1997). The economics of transition in Eastern Europe. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press. Boland, T., & Fowler, A. (2000). A system perspective of performance management in public sector organization. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 13(5), 417. Booth, D., Dawes, A., & Kigbo, F. (2004). Performance indicator for digital research and information services: A literature review. Retrieved from www.loc.gov. Bouckaert, G. (1996). Measurement of public sector performance: Some European perspectives. In Halachmi, A., & Bouckaert, G. (Eds), Organization performance and measurement in the public sector: Toward service, efforts and accomplishment reporting (pp 223-237). Westport, CT: Quorum Books. Bovaird, T. (1994). The political economy of performance measurement. In Halachmi, A., & Bouckaert, G. (Eds.), Organization performance and measurement in the public sector: Towards service, effort and accomplishment reporting (pp 145-165). Westport, CT: Quorum Books. Bovaird, T. (1996). Performance assessment of service quality: Lessons from UK national initiatives to influence local government. In Hermann, H., Helmut, K., & Elke, L. (Eds.), Quality innovation and measurements in the public sector (pp 37-64). Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang. Bovaird, T., & Gregory, D. (1996). Performance indicators: The British experience. In Halachmi, A., & Bouckaert, G. (Eds.), Organization performance and measurement in the public sector: Towards service, effort and accomplishment reporting (pp 239-273). Westport, CT: Quorum Books. Boyne, G. (2002). Local government: Concepts and indicators of local authority performance: An evaluation of the statutory frameworks in England and Wales. Public Money and Management, 22(2), 17-24. Brennan, N. M., & Solomon, J. (2008). Corporate governance, accountability and mechanisms of accountability: An overview. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 21(7), 885. Brown, L. D., & Caylor, M. L. (2006). Corporate governance and firm valuation. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 25, 409-434. Business Dictionary.Com, http://www.business dictionary.com/definition/public-sector.html. Cadbury Committee. (1992). Report of the committee on the financial aspects of corporate governance. London, England: Gee & Co. Ltd. Campbell, L. M. (2002). Procurement and performance in the public sector: A study in the context of the New Zealand community probation service (PhD Thesis). University of Canterbury, New Zealand. Carmichael, J., & Kaufmann, D. (2001). Proceedings for World Bank/IMF/Federal Reserve Board Conference on the Policy Challenges for the Financial Sector in the Context of Globalization: Public sector governance and the finance sector. Washington, DC. Carter, N. (1991). Learning to measure performance: The use of indicators in organizations. Public Administration, 69,85-101. Carter, N., Klein, R., & Day, P. (1995). How organization measure success? The use of performance indicators in government. London, England: Routledge. Cavana, R. Y., Delahaye, B. L., & Sekaran, U. (2001). Applied Business Research. Milton: John Wiley & Sons. Chapman, R. A. (2000). Ethics in public service for the new millennium. Vermont: Ashgate Publishing Company. Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy. (1995). Corporate governance: A framework for public service bodies. London, England: CIPFA. Cheema, G. S. (2005). Building democratic institutions: Governance reform in developing countries. New York: Kumarian Press Inc. Claessens, S. (2006). Corporate governance and development. The World Bank Research Observer, 21(1), 91-122. Clark, H. (2012). The importance of governance for sustainable development. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies. Retrieved from http://www.undp. org/content/undp/en/home/presscenter/speeches/2012/03/13/theimportance-of-governance-for- sustainable-development/. Clarke, T., & Clegg, S. R. (1998). Changing paradigms: The transformation of management knowledge for the 21st century. London: Harper Collins Publishers. Cochrane, A. (1993). From financial control to strategic management: The changing faces of accountability in British local government. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 6(3), 30. Cooper, P. J. (1998). Public administration for the 21st century. Orlando: Harcourt Brace & Company. Crowl, T. K. (1993). Fundamentals of educational research. Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2007). Public governance indicators: A literature review. United Nations: DESA. Department of Finance and Administration. (2003). Performance reporting under outcomes and outputs. Canberra, Australia. Department of Finance and Administration. (2005). Governance arrangements for Australian government bodies (Financial Management Reference Material No. 2). Canberra, Australia. Diamond, L. (2005). Democracy, development and good governance: The inseparable links (Paper read at the Maiden Annual Democracy and Governance). Accra, Ghana. Downs, G. W., & Larkey, P. D. (1986). The search for government efficiency: From hubris to helplessness. Philadelphia, U.S.: Temple University Press. Drucker, P. F. (1990). Managing the non profit organization: Practices and principles. Oxford, U.K.: Butterword-Heinemann Ltd. Drucker, P. F. (2001). The efficiency of the decision makers. Bucuresti: Editura Destin. Dube, S., & Danescu, D. (2011). Supplemental guidance: Public sector definition. Institute of Internal Auditors. Dumler, M. P., & Skinner, S. J. (2008).A Primer for management (2nd ed.). Mason, U.S.: Thomson South-Western. Economic Planning Unit. (2006). Ninth Malaysia Plan 2006-2010. Prime Minister's Department, Putrajaya, Malaysia: EPU. Edwards, M., & Clough, R. (2005). Corporate governance and performance: An exploration of the connection in a public sector context (Issues Paper No. 1). ARC Corporate Governance Project, Australia: University of Canberra. Emory, C. W., & Cooper, D. R. (1991). Business research methods. Homewood, Illinois: Irwin. Engku Ali, E. S. (2010). Hubungan antara sifat organisasi dan tadbir urus kerajaan dengan kualiti penyata kewangan kerajaan tempatan di Semenanjung Malaysia (PhD Thesis). Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia. Epstein, P. D. (1996). Redeeming the promise of performance measurement: Issues and obstacles for governments in the United States. In Halachmi, A., & Bouckaert, G. (Eds.), Organizational performance and measurement in the public sector: Toward service, effort and accomplishment reporting (pp 145-165). Westport, CT: Quorum Books. Farazmund, A., & Pinkowski, J. (2006). Handbook of globalization, governance and public administration. London: CRC Press. Flynn, N. (1997). Public sector management. London, England: Prentice Hall/Harvester Wheatsheaf. Frant, H. (1993). Rules and governance in the public sector: The case of civil service. American Journal of Political Science, 37(4), 990-1007. Gault, D. A. (2011). Transparency reforms in the public sector: Beyond the new economics of organization. Organization Studies, 32(8), 1029–1050. George, N. (2005). The role of audit committees in the public sector. The CPA Journal, 75(8), 42-43. Gompers, P. A., Ishii, J. L., & Metrick, A. (2003). Corporate governance and equity prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 107-155. Graham, J., Amos, B., & Plumptre, T. (2003). Principles for good governance in the 21st century (Policy Brief No. 15). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Institute on Governance. Greiner, J. M. (1996). Positioning performance measurement for the twenty first century. In Halachmi, A., & Bouckaert, G. (Eds.), Organizational performance and measurement in the public sector: Toward service, effort and accomplishment reporting (pp 11-50). Westport, CT: Quorum Books. Hair, J., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education International. Hair, J. F., Money, A. H., Samouel, P., & Page, M. (2007). Research methods for business. Sussex, England: John Wiley & Son Ltd. Halachmi, A., & Bouckaert, G. (1996). Organizational performance and measurement in the public sector: Toward service, effort and accomplishment reporting. Westport, CT: Quorum Books. Haladu, A. (2004). The role of accounting officers towards prudence, transparency and accountability in Jigawa state. In Dandago, K. I., & Tanko, A. L. (Eds.), Prudence, transparency and accountability. Kano, Nigeria: Gidan Dabino Publishers. Haniffa, R., & Hudaib, M. (2006). Corporate governance structure and performance of Malaysian listed companies. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 33(7/8), 1034-1062. Hatinen, A. J. (2004). Goals and performance: Proceedings of the seminar on user interfaces and performance. Department of Computer Science, Finland: University of Helsinki. Heald, D. (2006). Transparency as an instrumental value. In Hood, Christopher, & Heald (Eds.), Transparency, the key to better governance? (pp 59-73). Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press. Hodges, R., Wright, M., & Keasey, K. (1996). Corporate governance in the public services: concepts and issues. Public Money and Management, 7-13. Holloway, J. (1999). Managing performance. In Rose, A., & Lawton, A. (Eds.), Public services management (pp 238-259). Harlow: Financial Times/Prentice- Hall. Howard, C., & Purdie, R. S. (2005). Governance issues for public sector boards. Australian Journal of Public administration, 64(3), 58-68. Humphrey, C., Miller, P., & Scapens, R. W. (1993). Accountability and accountable management in the UK public sector. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 6(3), 7. Institute of Internal Auditors. (2006). The role of auditing in public sector governance. Florida, U.S.: IIA. International Federation of Accountants. (2001). Governance in the public sector: A governing body perspective. New York, U.S.: IFA. Ismail, N., Bayat, S., & Meyer, I. (1997). Local government management. Southern Africa: International Thomson Publishing. Jali, M. N. (2009). The relationship between good government governance and organization performance: The case of Mara Credit Control Department (Master Thesis). Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia. Kaufmann, D., & Kraay, A. (2003). Governance and growth: Causality which way? Evidence for the World (WBI Governance Working Papers and Articles). Washington, DC: World Bank Institute. Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Zoido-Lobaton, P. (1999). Governance matters (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2196). Washington, DC: The World Bank Development Research Group Macroeconomics and Growth and World Bank Institute Governance, Regulation and Finance. Khalid, S. N. A. (2010). Improving the service delivery: A case study of a local authority in Malaysia. Global Business Review, 11(1), 65–77. Khatri, Y., Leruth, L., & Piesse, J. (2002). Corporate performance and governance in Malaysia. (Working paper of International Monetary Fund No. 02/152). Washington, DC: IMF. Kloot, L. (2001). Using local government corporate plans in Victoria. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 60(4), 17-29. King Prajadhipok’s Institute. (2002). A study and research report on developing indicators of good governance. Thailand: Office of National Economic and Social Development Board. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610. Kusek, J. Z., & Rist, R. C. (2004). Ten steps to a results based monitoring and evaluation systems: A handbook for development practitioners. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications. Kyj, M. J. (2006). Internet use in Ukraine's Orange Revolution. Business Horizons, 49(1), 71-80. Langlands, A. (2005). The good governance standard for public services. London, England: Hackney Press Ltd. Lynn, L. (2001). Improving governance: A new logic for empirical research. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. Mackie, B. (2008). Organizational performance management in a government context: A literature review. Scotland: Scottish Government Social Research. Malaysian Institute of Integrity, www.iim.org.my. Malaysian Administrative Modernisation and Management Planning Unit. (2005). Guideline to form a customer service office at the government agency (Development Administration Circular, DAC 1/2005). Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: MAMPU. Malaysian Administrative Modernisation and Management Planning Unit. (2005). Guideline on establishing key indicators (KPI) and implementing performance assessment at government agency (Development Administration Circular, DAC 2/2005). Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: MAMPU. Manab, N. A., & Ghazali, Z. (2013). Does enterprise risk management create value? Journal of Advanced Management Science, 1(4), 358-362. Mandl, U., Dierx, A., & Ilzkovitz, F. (2008). The effectiveness and efficiency of public spending (No. 301). Directorate General Economic and Monetary Affairs, European Commission: DG ECFIN. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1995). Democratic governance. New York: The Free Press. Marshall, A. (2005). Linking governance and city performance: A review of the evidence base. Centre for Cities. Retrieved from http://www.ippr.org/assets/media/uploaded Files/cfc/research/projects/centre_for_cities/ web_annex_1_governance_and_performance.pdf. Martey, E. M. (2014). The relationship between customer retention and customer loyalty in the restaurant industry in Ghana. International Journal of Research, 1(8), 51-66. Mauhood, C. (1997). Performance measurement in the United Kingdom (1985-1995). In Chelimsky, E., & Shadish, W. (Eds.), Evaluation for the 21st century: A handbook (pp 140). California, U.S.: Sage Publication. Mavhivha, E. (2007). Leadership and governance perspectives in local government administration in South Africa: Limpopo Province (PhD Thesis). University of Pretoria, Pretoria. Mayntz, R. (1998). New challenges to governance theory (Jean Monnet Chair Papers RSC No. 98/50). Florence, Italy: European University Institute. Mayston, D. (1993). Principals, agents and the economics of accountability in the new public sector. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 6(3), 68. Mazmanian, D. A., & Sabatier, P. A. (1983). Implementation and public policy. Glenview, Ill: Scott, Foresman. McNamara, C., & Mong, S. (2005). Performance measurement and management: Some insights from practice. Australian Accounting Review, 15(35), 14-28. Mucciarone, M. A., & Neilson, J. (2011). Performance reporting in the Malaysian government. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance, 7(2), 5-77. Murphy, J. (2007). Undertaking a governance review (Paper to the ethical leadership and governance in the public sector conference). Canberra, Australia. Naidoo, I. A. (2011). The role of monitoring and evaluation in promoting good governance in South Africa: A case study of the Department of Social Development. (PhD Thesis). Johannesburg: University of Witwatersrand. New South Wales Audit Office. (1997a). Performance audit report on corporate governance (Volume 1: In principle). Sydney, Australia: NSWAO. New South Wales Audit Office. (1997b). Performance audit report on corporate governance (Volume 2: In practice). Sydney, Australia: NSWAO. Nicholl, P. (2006). Organizational structures do matters for good governance and good performance. Comparative Economic Studies, 48, 214-228. Nolan Committee. (1995). First report of the committee on standards of public life. London, England: HMSO. Nzongola-Ntalaja G. (2003). Conference prepared for a group of Haitian politicians on a study visit to Norway at the invitation of the Government Norway and the Institute of Studies in Applied International: Governance and development. Oslo, Norway. Oakes, L. S., & Young, J. J. (2008). Accountability re-examined: Evidence from Hull House. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 21(6), 765. O’Brien, R., Goetz, A. M., Scholte, J. A., & Williams. M. (2000). Contesting global governance: Multilateral economic institutions and global social movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Office of the Auditor General of British Columbia. (2008). Public sector governance: A guide to the principles of good practice and how are we doing? (Report 13, 2008/2009). British Columbia: The Public Reporting of Performance Measures. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. (1999). Local leadership: Local choice. London, England: ODPM. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. (2005). Five year plan. London, England: ODPM. O’Neill, O. (2002). A question of trust. The BBC Reith Lectures, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (1996). Performance auditing and the modernization of government. Paris, France: OECD Press. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2001a). Cities for citizens: Improving metropolitan governance. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2001b). Linking leadership to performance in public organization. Public Management Committee HRM, Paris, France: OECD Publishing. Otley, D. (1999). Performance management: A framework for management control systems research. Management Accounting Research, 10, 363-382. Page, B. L., & Simons, J. R. (2000). What government can do? Chicago: Chicago University Press. Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS survival manual: A step-by-step guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows (3rd ed.). Australia: Allen & Unwin. Parekh, D. S. (2007). Does good governance lead to good performance? Communique, 26. Penang Monthly. (2012). Corruption crime index: Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission 2006-2011. Retrieved from http://penangmonthly.com/statistics-july- 2012/. Penang Monthly. (2012). Corruption perception index across ASEAN countries: Transparency International 2001-2013. Retrieved from http://penangmonthly.com/statistics-july- 2012/. Peters, B. G. (2007). Performance based accountability. In Shah, A. (Eds.), Performance accountability and combating corruption (pp 15-32). Washington, DC: World Bank Publications. Phang, M. W. (2006). Output and performance measures: A case study of two New Zealand public sector organizations (Master Thesis). Christchurch, New Zealand: University of Canterbury. Phillips, D. (1990). The 1988 Nigerian civil service reforms and their post 1992 prospects (NISER Occasional Paper No. 3). Nigeria: NISER Ibadan Nigeria. Piotrowski, S. J., & Van Ryzin, G. G. (2007). Citizen attitudes towards transparency in local government. The American Review of Public Administration, 37(3), 306-323. Pollitt, C., Girre, X., Lonsdale, J., Mul, R., Summa, H., & Waerness. (1999). Performance or compliance? Performance audit and public management in five countries. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press. Power, M. (1997). The audit society. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press. Profiroiu, M. (2001). The management of public organisations. Bucuresti: Editura Economica. Radnor, Z., & McGuire, M. (2004). Performance management in the public sector: Fact or fiction? International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 53(3), 245-260. Raja Nazrin. (2007). Malaysia able to prosper due to good governance (BERNAMA). Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Rivenbark, W. C., & Allison, G. S. (2003). The GFOA and professionalism in local government. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, 15(2), 228. Rogers, S. (1994). Performance management in local government. Essex, England: Longmans. Rohdewohld, R. (1995). Public administration in Indonesia. Clayton, Victoria, Australia: Montech & Melbourne. Rotberg, R. I. (2005). Strengthening governance: Ranking countries would help. The Washington Quarterly, 28(1), 71-81. Rouse, J. (1993). Resource and performance management in public service organizations. In Isaac-Henry, K., Painter, C., & Barnes, C. (Eds.), Management in the Public Sector, Challenge and Change (pp 59-76). London: Chapham & Hall. Rouse, J. (1999). Performance management, quality management and contracts. In Horton, S., & Farnham, D. (Eds.), Public Management in Britain (pp 76-93). Basingstoke: Macmillan. Ryan, C., & Ng, C. (2000). Public sector corporate governance disclosure: An examination of annual reporting practices in Queensland. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 59(2), 11-23. Ryan, C., & Purcell, B. (2004). Corporate governance disclosure by local government authorities (Working Paper No. 2004-2008). Australia: Queensland University of Technology. Ryan, C., Stanley, T., & Nelson, M. (2002) Accountability disclosures by Queensland local government councils 1997-1999. Financial Accountability and Management, 18(3), 261-189. Sakiko, F. & Richard, P. (2002). Governance: Past, present and future setting the governance agenda for the millennium declaration. Retrieved from http://www.undp.org/governance/eventsites/PAR_ Bergen_2002/gov-past-presentfuture.pdf. Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2010). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach. United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Sendt, B. (2002). Proceedings of the 38th Biennial Conference of the Association of Australian Ports and Marine Authorities, 17 June 2002: Corporate governance in the public sector. New South Wales, Australia: The Audit Office of NSW. Shakir, R. (2004). Proceedings of the International Real Estate Research Symposium 13-15 April 2004: Malaysian property firms: The governance issues. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: INSPEN. Sharma, M. K., & Jain, S. (2013). Leadership management: Principles, models and theories. Global Journal of Management and Business Studies, 3(3), 309-318. Siddiquee, N. A. (2014). Malaysia’s government transformation programmed: A preliminary assessment. Intellectual Discourse, 22(1), 7-31. Skelcher, C., & Mathur, N. (2004). Governance arrangements and public service performance: Reviewing and reformulating the research agenda (AIM Research Working Paper). London: Advanced Institute of Management Series. Sorber, B. (1996). Experience with performance measurement in the central government: The case of the Netherlands. In Halachmi, A., Bouckaert, G. (Eds.), Organizational performance and measurement in the public sector: Toward service, effort and accomplishment reporting (pp 309-318). Westport, CT: Quorum Books. Stone, C. N. (1989). Regime politics: Governing Atlanta (abstract) 1946-1988. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas. Retrieved from JSTOR Abstract Database. Svara, J. H. (1988). Conflict, cooperation and separation of powers in city government. Journal of Urban Affair, 10(4), 357-372. Svara, J. H. (1990). Local government reform: Its nature, impact and relevance to regionalism. National Civic Review, 79(4), 306-317. Tan Sri Dato Ahmad Sarji Abdul Hamid. (1992). The public service of Malaysia: Some reflections on quality, productivity and discipline. Kuala Lumpur: Percetakan Nasional Malaysia Berhad. Tan Sri Mohd. Sidek Hj. Hassan. (2007). Surat arahan ketua setiausaha negara: Usaha bagi mempertingkatkan tadbir urus dalam sektor awam. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: KSN. The Independent Commission U.K. (2004). The good governance standard for public services. London, England: Hackney Press Ltd. The Netherlands Ministry of Finance. (2000). Government governance: Corporate governance in the public sector, why and how? Government Audit Policy Directorate, The Hague: Drukkerij Van Deventer & S-Gravenzande. The Star. (2010). Action on civil servants based on AG’s report, says chief secretary. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. The Sun Daily. (2008). Explain how MPSP's reserves shrank: Guan Eng. Penang, Malaysia. The Sun Daily. (2009). Auditors to probe MPSP's RM230 million losses. Penang, Malaysia. The United Nations Development Programme. (2007). The United Nations Development agenda: Development for all. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York: UNDP. Thompson, J. (2000). The dual potentialities of performance measurement: The case of the social security administration. Public Productivity and Management Review, 23(3), 267-281. Tricker, R. I. (1994). International corporate governance: Text, reading and cases (pp 149). New York: Prentice Hall. Turner, M., & Hulme, D. (1997). Governance, administration and development: Making the state work. Basingstoke: Macmillan. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2005). Bottom up approaches and methodologies to develop foundations and principles of public administration: The example of criteria based organizational assessment. United Nations: Committee of Experts on Public Administration. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2007). Public governance indicators: A literature review. United Nations: Division for Public Administration and Development Management. United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. (2008). What is Good Governance? United Nations: UNESCAP. United States General Accounting Office. (1992). Program performance measures: Federal agency collection and use of performance data (Report GAO/GGD-92-65). Washington, DC: GAO. Utusan Malaysia. (2000). Giat perangi rasuah. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Van Teijlingen, E. R., & Hundley, V. (2002). The importance of pilot studies. Nursing Standard, 16(40), 33-36. Vishwannath, T., & Kaufmann, D. (2001). Toward transparency: New approaches and their application to financial market. The World Bank Research Observer, 16(1), 41-58. Walker, W. E. (2000). Policy analysis: A systematic approach to supporting policymaking in the public sector. Journal Multi-Criteria Decision Anal, 9, 11–27. Washington, S. (1999). Proceeding of the B1 IA Conference on Improving Public Sector Policy through Quality Evaluation: Looping the loop: The importance of evaluation in policy advice. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Social Development. Weiss, T. G. (2000). Governance, good governance and global governance: Conceptual and actual challenges. Third World Quarterly, 21(5), 795-814 Whiteoak, J. (1996). Corporate governance: Why local government should manage its own agenda? Public Money and Management, 23-29. Wholey, J. S. (1983). Evaluation and effectiveness public management. Boston, U.S.: Little Brown & Company. Wholey, J. S. (1999). Performance based management: Responding to the challenges. Public Productivity and Management Review, 22(3), 288-290. World Bank. (1983). World Development Report 1983 (Publication Summary). Washington, DC: The World Bank. World Bank. (1992). Governance and development. Washington, DC: The World Bank. World Bank. (2001). Governance: Poverty reduction strategy. Washington, DC: The World Bank. World Bank. (2003). E-government. Retrieved from www.worldbank.org. Yacuzzi, E. (2005). A primer on governance and performance in small and medium sized enterprises (Working Papers Series No. 293). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Universidad del CEMA. Yahaya, K. A. (2006). Strategies of enhancing ethics and accountability in Nigerian public service as view by accountants. Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 11(1). Zainuddin, N. (2010). Penyelidikan saintifik: Asas dan aplikasi. Malaysia: McGraw-Hill Sdn. Bhd. Zikmund, W. G. (2000). Business Research Methods (6th ed.). Orlando, U.S.: Dryden Press.