Hubungan antara iklim keselamatan dengan prestasi keselamatan pekerjaan : Kajian di ILJTM Lembah Klang

Hubungan antara iklim keselamatan dengan prestasi keselamatan pekerjaan : Kajian di ILJTM Lembah Klang

This study is intended to determine and examine the relationship between safety climate and safety performance of work in ILJTM Klang Valley. Five dimensions of safety climate in this study are safety attitude, employee involvement, employee safety commitment, co-worker safety and risk perception. T...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Muhamad Aidil, Harun
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
Published: 2014
Subjects:
T55-55.3 Industrial Safety
Industrial Accident Prevention
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/4640/1/s815952.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4640/2/s815952_abstract.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.4640
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
advisor Mustafa, Munauwar
topic T55-55.3 Industrial Safety
Industrial Accident Prevention
spellingShingle T55-55.3 Industrial Safety
Industrial Accident Prevention
Muhamad Aidil, Harun
Hubungan antara iklim keselamatan dengan prestasi keselamatan pekerjaan : Kajian di ILJTM Lembah Klang
description This study is intended to determine and examine the relationship between safety climate and safety performance of work in ILJTM Klang Valley. Five dimensions of safety climate in this study are safety attitude, employee involvement, employee safety commitment, co-worker safety and risk perception. To achieve the objectives of the study, a total of 140 sets of questionnaires were distributed to the operational department staffs in ILJTM Klang Valley. Quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS software. It includes Descriptive Statistics Analysis, Reliability Test and Pearson Correlation Test. In addition, Multiple Regression Test is used to test the hypotheses. Pearson Correlation Test found that there is a positive relationship between almost all safety climate dimensions and safety performance and its components. Whereas, Multiple Regression Test showed that employee safety commitment and risk perception are significantly related to safety performance and its components. Meanwhile, only employee involvement and co-worker safety have a significant relationship with safety participation. Other safety climate dimension namely safety attitude was not significantly related to safety performance and its components. Finally, the implications of this study and directions for future research were discussed.
format Thesis
qualification_name masters
qualification_level Master's degree
author Muhamad Aidil, Harun
author_facet Muhamad Aidil, Harun
author_sort Muhamad Aidil, Harun
title Hubungan antara iklim keselamatan dengan prestasi keselamatan pekerjaan : Kajian di ILJTM Lembah Klang
title_short Hubungan antara iklim keselamatan dengan prestasi keselamatan pekerjaan : Kajian di ILJTM Lembah Klang
title_full Hubungan antara iklim keselamatan dengan prestasi keselamatan pekerjaan : Kajian di ILJTM Lembah Klang
title_fullStr Hubungan antara iklim keselamatan dengan prestasi keselamatan pekerjaan : Kajian di ILJTM Lembah Klang
title_full_unstemmed Hubungan antara iklim keselamatan dengan prestasi keselamatan pekerjaan : Kajian di ILJTM Lembah Klang
title_sort hubungan antara iklim keselamatan dengan prestasi keselamatan pekerjaan : kajian di iljtm lembah klang
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business
publishDate 2014
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/4640/1/s815952.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4640/2/s815952_abstract.pdf
_version_ 1747827771232485376
spelling my-uum-etd.46402022-08-03T01:53:56Z Hubungan antara iklim keselamatan dengan prestasi keselamatan pekerjaan : Kajian di ILJTM Lembah Klang 2014 Muhamad Aidil, Harun Mustafa, Munauwar Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business T55-55.3 Industrial Safety. Industrial Accident Prevention This study is intended to determine and examine the relationship between safety climate and safety performance of work in ILJTM Klang Valley. Five dimensions of safety climate in this study are safety attitude, employee involvement, employee safety commitment, co-worker safety and risk perception. To achieve the objectives of the study, a total of 140 sets of questionnaires were distributed to the operational department staffs in ILJTM Klang Valley. Quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS software. It includes Descriptive Statistics Analysis, Reliability Test and Pearson Correlation Test. In addition, Multiple Regression Test is used to test the hypotheses. Pearson Correlation Test found that there is a positive relationship between almost all safety climate dimensions and safety performance and its components. Whereas, Multiple Regression Test showed that employee safety commitment and risk perception are significantly related to safety performance and its components. Meanwhile, only employee involvement and co-worker safety have a significant relationship with safety participation. Other safety climate dimension namely safety attitude was not significantly related to safety performance and its components. Finally, the implications of this study and directions for future research were discussed. 2014 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/4640/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/4640/1/s815952.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/4640/2/s815952_abstract.pdf text eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Akta Keselamatan dan Kesihatan Pekerjaan 1994 (Akta 514). Baas, J. R. (2002). An exploratory study of the role of trust in safety climates and overall safety. (Doctoral Dissertation, Alliant international University, 2002). Barling, J., & Hutchinson, I. (2000). Commitment vs. control-based safety practices, safety reputation, and perceived safety climate. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 17, 76–84. Bellamy, L. J., Geyer, T. A., & Wilkinson, J. (2008). Development of a functional model which integrates human factors, safety management systems and wider organisational issues. Safety Science, 46, 461–492. Berends, J.J. (1996). On the Measurement of Safety Culture (Unpublished graduation report). Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven. Beus, J.M., Payne, S.C., Bergman, M.E., & Arthur, W. Jr. (2010b). Safety climate and injuries: An examination o f theoretical and empirical relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(4), 713-727. Borman, W.C., & Motowidlo, S.J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In: Schmidt, N., Borman, W.C., Howard, A., Kraut, A., Ilgen, D., Schneider, B., Zedeck, S. (Eds.), Personnel Selection in Organizations. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 1-98. Borman, W.C., & Motowidlo, S.J. (1997). Introduction: organizational citizenship behavior and contextual performance. Special issue of human performance. In: Borman, W.C., Motowidlo, S.J., (Eds.), Human Performance, 10, pp. 67-69. Brown, R.L., & Holmes, H. (1986). The use of a factor-analytic procedure for assessing the validity of an employee safety climate model. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 18, 455-470. Burke, M. J., Sarpy, S. A., Tesluk, P. E., & Smith-Crowe, K. (2002). General safety performance: A test of a grounded theoretical model. Personnel Psychology, 55, 429-457. Cascio, J. & Baughn, K. T. (2000). Health, safety and ISO 14001. Manufacturing Engineering, 124(5), 126-135. Christian, M. S., Bradley, J. C., Wallace, J. C., & Burke, M. J. (2009). Workplace safety: A meta-analysis of the roles of person and situation factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1103-1127. Christoffel, T., & Gallagher, S.S. (2006). Injury and Public Health: Practical Knowledge, Skills and Strategies (2nd. Ed.). Sudbury, MA. Jones and Bartlette Publishers, Inc. Clarke, S. (2006b). The relationship between safety climate and safety performance: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11(4), 315-327. Clarke, S., & Ward, K. (2006). The role of leader influence tactics and safety climate in engaging employees’ safety participation, Risk Analysis, Vol. 26, No. 5, pp. 1175-1185. Cooper, D. (1998). Improving safety culture: A practical guide. England: John Wiley and Sons Ltd. Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2008). Business Research Methods: international edition 2008. New York: McGraw-Hill. Cooper, M.D., & Phillips, R.A. (2004). Exploratory analysis of the safety climate and safety behavior relationship. Journal of Safety Research, 35(5), 497-512. Cox, S., & Cox, T. (1991). The structure of employee attitude to safety: a European example. Work and Stress, 5, 93-106. Cox, S., & Flin R. (1998). Safety culture: Philosopher's stone or man of straw? Work and Stress, 12(3), 189-201. Cox, S., Jones, B., & Rycraft, H. (2004). Behavioural approaches to safety management within UK reactor plants. Safety Science, 42, 825–839. Coyle, I.R., Sleeman, S.D., & Adams, N. (1995). Safety climate. Journal of Safety Research, 26(4), 247-254. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among the five traditions (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Dedobbeleer, N., & Béland, F. (1991). A safety climate measure for construction sites. Journal of Safety Science, 22, 97-103. Dedobbeleer, N., & Béland, F. (1998). Is risk perception one of the dimensions of safety climate. Occupational injury: Risk prevention and intervention, 73-81. Dekker, S. W. (2001). The re-invention of human error. Human factors and aerospace safety, 1(3), 247-265. DePasquale, J. P., and E. S. Geller. (1999). Critical success factors for behavior-based safety: A study of 20 industry-wide applications. Journal of Safety Research 30, 237-49. Donald, I. (1996). Managing safety: an attitudinal-based approach to improving safety in organizations. Leadership & Organization Development Journal 17(4), 13-20. Fahibruch, B. (2010). Integrating human factors in safety and reliability approaches. Paper presented at the 4th European-American Workshop on Reliability of NDE. Berlin, Germany. Flin, R., Meams, K., O'connor, P., & Bryden, R. (2000). Measuring safety climate: Identifying the common features. Safety Science, 34(1-3), 177-192. Gillen, M., Baltz, D., Gassel, M., Kirsch, L., & Vaccaro, D. (2002). Perceived safety climate, job demands, and coworker support among union and nonunion injured construction workers. Journal of safety research, 33(1), 33-51. Glendon, A. I., & Stanton, N. A. (2000). Perspectives on safety culture. Safety Science, 34(1-3), 193-213. Glendon, A.I., & Litherland, D.K. (2001). Safety climate factors, group differences and safety behavior in road construction. Safety Science, 39(3), 157-188. Gordon, R., Flin, R., & Mearns, K. (2001). Designing a human factors investigation tool to improve the quality of safety reporting. Paper presented at the 45th Annual meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1519-1523. Grabowski, M., Ayyalasomayajula, P., Merrick, J., Harrald, J.R., & Roberts, K. (2006). Leading indicators of safety in virtual organizations, Safety Science, Vol. 45, pp. 1013-1043. Griffin, M.A., & Neal, A. (2000). Perceptions of safety at work: A framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(3), 347-358. Guldenmund, F.W. (2000). The nature of safety culture: A review of theory and research. Safety Science, 24, 215-257. Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., & Anderson, R.E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis. Seventh Edition. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. Hale, A.R. (2000). Culture’s confusions. Safety Science, Vol, 34, No. 1-3, pp. 1-14. Hayes, B. E., Perander, J., Smecko, T., & Trask, J. (1998). Measuring perceptions of workplace safety: development and validation of the workplace safety scale. Journal of Safety Research, 29(3), 145-161. Henning, B. J., Stuff, C. J., Payne, S. C. Bergman, M. E., Mannan, M. S., & Keren, N. (2009). The influence of individual differences on organizational safety attitude. Journal of Safety Science, 47, 337-345. Hofmann, D.A., & Stetzer, A. (1996). A cross-level investigation o f factors influencing unsafe behaviors and accidents. Personnel Psychology, 49, 307-339. Huang, Y. H., Ho, M., Smith, G. S., & Chen, P. Y. (2006). Safety climate and selfreported injury: assessing the mediating role of employee safety control. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 38, 425-433. Hughes, S. W., Tippett, D. D., & Thomas, W. K. (2004). Measuring project success in the construction Industry. Engineering Management Journal, 16(3), 31-37. Inness, M., Turner, T., Barling, J., & Stride, C. B. (2010). Transformational leadership and employee safety performance: A within-person, between-jobs design. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15(3), 279-290. Institut Keselamatan dan Kesihatan Pekerjaan (2012), Malaysia: Kementerian Sumber Manusia. Jabatan Keselamatan dan Kesihatan Pekerjaan (2012), Malaysia: Kementerian Sumber Manusia. Johnstone, R., Quinlan, M., & Walters, D. (2005). Statutory occupational health and safety workplace arrangements for the modern labour market. Journal of Industrial Relations, 47(1), 93-116. Kelley, R. (1996). Worker psychology and safety attitudes. Professional Safety, 41, 14-17. Kelloway, E. K., Stinson, V., & MacLean, C. (2004). Can eyewitness research improve occupational health and safety? Towards a research agenda. Law and Human Behavior, 28. Khan, M. S. (2010). Effects of human resource management practices on organizational performance an empirical study of oil and gas industry in Pakistan. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, (24), 157-175. Kilborne, C. (2009). 5 Keys to Improving Worker Safety Attitude. Safety Daily Advisor. Retrieved 1/10/2012 from http://safetydailadvis or.blr.com/archive/2009/04/28/safety_attitude_ economy_creative_training.aspx. Kohli, S. (2007). Safety management system. Bangalore, Indian: Bangalore International Airport Limited. Kozlowski, S.W., & Klein, K.J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations. In: Klein, K.J., Kozlowski, S.W. (Eds.), Multilevel Theory, Research and Methods in Organizations. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, pp. 4-90. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and psychological measurement, 30, 607-610. Larsson, S., Pousette, A., & Tömer, M. (2008). Psychological climate and safety in the construction industry-mediated influence on safety behavior. Safety Science, 46(3), 405-412. Lawton, R., & Parker, D. (1998). Individual differences in accident liability: A review and integrative approach. Human Factors, 40, 655-671. Lingard, H., Cooke, T., & Blismas, N. (2010). Safety climate in conditions of construction subcontracting: A multi-level analysis. Construction Management and Economics, 28(8), 813-825. Lu, C.S., & Tsai, C.L. (2008). The effects of safety climate on vessel accidents in the container shipping context. Accidents Analysis and Prevention, 40(2), 594-601. Lu, C.S., & Yang, C.S. (2011). Safety climate and safety behavior in the passenger ferry context. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 43, 329-341. McDonald, N., Corrigan, S., Daly, C., & Cromie, S. (2000). Safety management systems and safety culture in aircraft maintenance organisations. Safety Science, 34, 151-176. Mearns, K., Flin, R., Gordon, R., & Fleming, M. (2001). Human and organizational factors in offshore safety. Work & Stress, 15, 144-160. Morrow, S.L., McGonagle, A.K., dove-Steinkamp, M.L., Walker C.T. Jr., Marmet, M., & Bames-Farrell, J.L. (2010). Relationships between psychological safety climate facets and safety behavior in the rail industry: A dominance analysis. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 42, 1460-1467. Mullen, J. (2004). Investigating factors that influence individual safety behavior at work. Journal o f Safety Research, 35, 275-285. Neal, A. and Griffin, M.A. (2004). Safety climate and safety at work. In Barling, J. and Frone, M.R. (Eds.), The Psychology o f Workplace Safety (pp.15-34). USA: American Psychological Association. Neal, A. G., & Griffin, M. A. (2002). Safety climate and safety behaviour. Australian Journal of Management, 27, 67-76. Neal, A., & Griffin, M. A. (2006). A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, Safety motivation, safety behaviour, and accidents at the individual and group levels. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 946-953. Neal, A., Griffin, M. A., & Hart, P. M. (2000). The impact of organizational climate on safety climate and individual behaviour. Safety Science 34, 99-109. Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric Theory (2nd edition). New York: McGraw-Hill. Paul, P.S., & Maiti, J. 2007. The role of behavioral factors on safety management in underground mines. Safety Science, 45(4), 449-471. Pertubuhan Keselamatan Sosial (2012), Malaysia: Kementerian Sumber Manusia. Pousette, A., Larsson, S., & Tömer, M. (2008). Safety climate cross-validation, strength and prediction of safety behaviour. Safety Science, 46(3), 398-404. Rundmo, T. (1997). Associations between risk perception and safety. Safety Science, 24, 197-209. Rundmo, T. (2000). Safety climate, attitudes and risk perception in Norsk Hydro, Safety Science, 34 (1-3), 47-59. Sawacha, E., Naoum, S., & Fong, D. (1999). Factors affecting safety performance on construction sites. International Journal of Project Management, 17(5), 309-315. Schein, E. H. (1992). Organizational culture and leadership: A dynamic view (2nd Ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Schutte, R. (2010). Safety performance in the construction sector the influence of transformational leadership and the mediating role of safety climate. Dissertation Master, Utrecht University. Sekaran, U. (2000). Research methods for business: A skill building approach (3rd ed.). USA: John Wiley & Sons Inc. Sekaran, U. (2003). Research methods for business: A skill building approach (4th ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons. Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2010). Research methods for business: A skill building approach (5th ed.). UK: John Wiley & Sons. Seo, D.S. (2005). An explicative model of unsafe work behavior. Safety Science, 43, 187-211. Siu, O., Phillips, D.R., & Leung, T. (2004). Safety climate and safety performance among construction workers in Hong Kong: The role of psychological strains as mediators. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 36(3), 359-366. Tharaldsen, J., Mearns, K., & Knudsen, K. (2010). Perspectives on safety: The impact of group membership, work factors and trust on safety performance in UK and Norwegian drilling company employees. Safety Science. Vol. 48, pp. 1062-1072. Tomás, J. M., Meliá, J. L., & Oliver, A. (1999). A cross-validation of a structural equation model of accidents: Organizational and psychological variables as predictors of work safety. Work & Stress, 13(1), 49-58. doi: 10.1080/026783799296183. Veloo, A. (2012).Kaedah Analisis & Interpretasi Data. UUM Pres: Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah. Vinodkumar, M. N., & Bhasi, M. (2009). Safety Climate factors and its relationship with accidents and personal attributes in the chemical industry. Safety Science, 47(5), 659-667. Vinodkumar, M. N., & Bhasi, M. (2010). Safety management practices and safety behaviour: Assessing the mediating role of safety knowledge and motivation. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 42, 2082-2093. Watson, G., Scott, D., Bishop, J., & Turnbeaugh, T. (2005). Dimensions of interpersonal relationships and safety in the steel industry. Journal of Business and Psychology, 19, 303-318. Wiegmann, D. A., Zhang, H., & von Thaden, T. L. (2001). Defining and assessing safety culture in high reliability systems: An annotated bibliography (Tech. Rep. ARL 01-12/FAA-01-4). Savoy, IL: Aviation Research Lab. Williamson, A.M., Feyer, A.M., Cairns, D., & Biancotti, D. (1997). The development of a measure of safety climate: The role of safety perceptions and attitudes. Safety Science, 25, 15-27. Wu, S. (2009). The impact of collaborative working on construction project performance. Dissertation PhD, University of Northumbria, Newcastle. Wu, T. C. (2000). The correlational study between safety climate and safety performance in four categories of manufacturing industries in central Taiwan. Dissertation PhD, National Changhua University of Education. Wu, T., Lee, G., Shu, Y., & Shu, C. (2010). Disordinal interaction effects of organizational and individual factors on safety performance in university laboratories. Journal of Occupational Safety and Health, 18, 15-32. Wu, T.C., Chen, C.H., & Li, C.C. (2008). A correlation among safety leadership, safety climate and safety performance Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 21(3), 307-318. Yang, C., Wang, Y., Chang, S. Guo, S., & Huang, M. (2010). A study on the leadership behaviour, safety culture, and safety performance of the healthcare industry. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology L: Educational and Psychological Sciences, 2(2), 87-94. Zhou, Q., Fang, D., & Wang, X. (2008). A method to identify strategies for the improvement of human safety behavior by considering safety climate and personal experience. Safety Science, 46(10), 1406-1419. Zikmund, W.G. (2003). Business Research Methods. 7th Edition: South-Western: Ohio. Zohar, D. (1980). Safety climate in industrial organizations: Theoretical and applied implications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65(1), 96-102. Zohar, D. (2003). Safety climate: Conceptual and measurement issues. In Quick, J.C. and Tetrick, L.E. (Eds.), Handbook of Occupational Health Psychology (pp. 123-142). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association. Zohar, D., & Luria, G. (2004). Climate as a social-cognitive construction of supervisory safety practices: Scripts as proxy of behavior patterns. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(2), 322-333. Zohar, D., & Luria, G. (2005). A multilevel model of safety climate: Cross-level relationships between organization and group-level climates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 616-628.

Similar Items