Car plate tendering in Malaysia

This is the first empirical research examining the determinants of car plate winning price. Detailed car plate auctioning information such as bidder demographic profile (age, race and gender) and bid price and bid premium are obtained from the Road Transport Department of Malaysia (RTD or JPJ) for t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zhou, Yao
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
Published: 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/4642/1/s815648.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4642/2/s815648_abstract.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.4642
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
advisor Wong, Woei Chyuan
topic HF5001-6182 Business
spellingShingle HF5001-6182 Business
Zhou, Yao
Car plate tendering in Malaysia
description This is the first empirical research examining the determinants of car plate winning price. Detailed car plate auctioning information such as bidder demographic profile (age, race and gender) and bid price and bid premium are obtained from the Road Transport Department of Malaysia (RTD or JPJ) for the state of Kedah during 2011 to 2013. Capitalizing on this proprietary dataset, I attempt to quantify bidders’ willingness to pay for superstition believes and visual appealing numbers. Car plate numbers offer a good laboratory test to consumers’ willingness to pay since car plate numbers have no intrinsic value. More so in Malaysia where there is no secondary market for car plate where plate numbers are not transferable. I find support for superstition hypothesis where an addition of number “8”to a plate is associated with 9.4% premium in winning bid price while an addition of number “4” to a plate reduces the bid price by 10.4%. Chinese community perceives number “8” as lucky number because it rhymes similarly to the word “prosper” or “prosperity”. “4” is bad for it rhymes similarly to the word “die” or “death”. I also find support for visual appealing hypothesis where visually appealing plates are sold at the significant premium as compared to other plates. For example, single and double digits car plates are 181% and 42.4% more expensive than a non-single digit car plate
format Thesis
qualification_name masters
qualification_level Master's degree
author Zhou, Yao
author_facet Zhou, Yao
author_sort Zhou, Yao
title Car plate tendering in Malaysia
title_short Car plate tendering in Malaysia
title_full Car plate tendering in Malaysia
title_fullStr Car plate tendering in Malaysia
title_full_unstemmed Car plate tendering in Malaysia
title_sort car plate tendering in malaysia
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business
publishDate 2014
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/4642/1/s815648.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4642/2/s815648_abstract.pdf
_version_ 1747827771729510400
spelling my-uum-etd.46422022-06-09T01:02:09Z Car plate tendering in Malaysia 2014 Zhou, Yao Wong, Woei Chyuan Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business HF5001-6182 Business This is the first empirical research examining the determinants of car plate winning price. Detailed car plate auctioning information such as bidder demographic profile (age, race and gender) and bid price and bid premium are obtained from the Road Transport Department of Malaysia (RTD or JPJ) for the state of Kedah during 2011 to 2013. Capitalizing on this proprietary dataset, I attempt to quantify bidders’ willingness to pay for superstition believes and visual appealing numbers. Car plate numbers offer a good laboratory test to consumers’ willingness to pay since car plate numbers have no intrinsic value. More so in Malaysia where there is no secondary market for car plate where plate numbers are not transferable. I find support for superstition hypothesis where an addition of number “8”to a plate is associated with 9.4% premium in winning bid price while an addition of number “4” to a plate reduces the bid price by 10.4%. Chinese community perceives number “8” as lucky number because it rhymes similarly to the word “prosper” or “prosperity”. “4” is bad for it rhymes similarly to the word “die” or “death”. I also find support for visual appealing hypothesis where visually appealing plates are sold at the significant premium as compared to other plates. For example, single and double digits car plates are 181% and 42.4% more expensive than a non-single digit car plate 2014 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/4642/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/4642/1/s815648.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/4642/2/s815648_abstract.pdf text eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Abbott, K.,R, & Sherratt, T.,N,.(2011). The evolution of superstition through optimal use of incomplete information. Animal Behaviour, 82(1),85-92. Agarwal, S., He, J., Liu, H., Png, I., Sing, T.F., & Wong, W.K.(2014). Superstition and Asset Markets: Evidence from Singapore Housing. Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract= 2416832. American Heritage Dictionary (1985), 2nd ed., Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Ang, S. H. (1997). Chinese consumers’ perception of alpha-numeric brand names. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 14(3), 220–233. Ashenfelter, O. (1989). How auctions work for wine and art. Journal of Economics, 3, 23–36. Biddle, J. (1991). A bandwagon effect in personalized license plates. Economic Inquiry, 29(2), 375–388. Bourassa, S. C., & Peng, V. S. (1999). Hedonic prices and house numbers: The influence of Feng Shui. International Real Estate Review, 2(1), 79-93. Budde, M., & Minner,S.(2014). First- and second-price sealed-bid auctions applied to push and pull supply contracts. European Journal of Operational Research, 237, 370-382. Burger, J., & Lynn, A. L. (2005). Superstitious behavior among American and Japanese professional baseball players. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 27(1), 71-76. Case, T. I., J. Fitness, D. R. Cairns., & R. J. Stevenson (2004), Coping with uncertainty: Superstitious strategies and secondary control. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 848-871. Cassady R Jr. (1967). Auctions and Auctioneering, Berkeley and Los Angeles, University of California press. Chau, W., Ma. S., & Ho, D. (2001). The pricing of ‘Luckiness’ in the apartment market. Journal of Real Estate Literature, 9(1), 29–40. Chong, T. T.-L., & Du, X. (2008). Hedonic pricing models for vehicle registration marks. Pacific Economic Review, 13(2), 259–276. Coppinger, M. Vernon L., & Titus, J. (1980), Incentives and behavior in English, Dutch and sealed-bid auctions. Economic Inquiry, 18, 1–22. Coppinger, V. Smith, M., & Titus, J.(1980). Incentives and behavior in English, Dutch and Sealed-Bid Auctions, Economic Inquiry, Oxford University Press, 18(1), 1-22. Cox, J. Smith, L., & Walker, M. (1992). Theory and misbehavior of first-price auctions: comment. American Economic Review, 82, 1392–1412. Cox, J., Roberson, B., & Smith, V. (1982). Theory and behavior of single object auctions. Research in experimental economics, 2, 1-43. Craft, D., (2002). The Demand for Vanity (Plates): Elasticities, Net Revenue Maximization, and Deadweight Loss. Journal of Economics,20(2), 1-20. Darke, R., & Freedman,L. (1997), “The Belief in Good Luck Scale,” Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 486–511. Elyakime, B. Laffont, J. Loisel, P.,& Vuong, Q. (1994). First-price sealed-bid auctions with secret reservation prices. Annals of Economics statistical, 34, 115–142. Freud, S.,& Brebner, K.,( 2012). Superstitions: Illogical phenomena? Or Uniquely Useful Behaviours? Working paper, Department of Psychology St. Francis Xavier University. Friedman, D. (1992). Theory and misbehavior of first-price auctions: comment. American Economic Review, 82, 1374–1378. Fudenberg, Drew.,& David K. Levine,.(2006). Superstition and Rational Learning. American Economic Review, 96(3), 630-651. Gujarati, D.(2009). Basic Econometrics. 5th Edition. Press: McGraw Hill Education. Hair JF, Anderson R, Tatham RL., & Black WC. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis. Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, N.J. Hansen, R. (1988). Auctions with endogenous quantity. RAND Journal of Economics, 19(1), 44-58. Harrison, W. (1992). Theory and misbehavior of first-price auctions: reply. American Economic Review, 82, 1426–1443. Horstmann, I., & Lacasse, C. (1997). Secret reserve prices in a bidding model with a resale option. American Economic Review, 87(4), 663–684. Isaac, R.M., & Walker, J.M. (1985). Information and Conspiracy in Sealed Bid Auctions, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 6, 139-159. Ivanova, R., & Salmon, T. (2006). “Revenue Equivalence Revisited” Working Paper, FL State University. http://garnet.acns.fsu.edu/~tsalmon/iss4.pdf. Jahoda, Gustav. (1969).The Psychology of Superstition, New York: Penguin. Kagel, J. H., & Roth, A. E. (1992). Theory and misbehavior of first-price auctions: comment. American Economic Review, 82, 1379–1391. Katok, E., & Kwasnica M.(2008). Time is money: The effect of clock speed on seller’s revenue in Dutch auctions. Experimental Economics, 11, 344–357. Kramer, T., & Block, L. (2009). Conscious and nonconscious components of superstitious beliefs in judgment and decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(6), 783–793. Li, H., & Tan, G., (2000). Hidden reserve prices with risk-averse bidders. Working Paper. The University of British Columbia. Ling.Z. (2003). Unlucky number. China Business Daily. Marchal, F., & Morand,P. (2011). First-price sealed-bid auctions when bidders exhibit different attitudes toward risk. Economics Letters, 103, 108-111. Maskin, E., & Riley, J. (1984). Optimal auctions with risk averse buyers. Econometrica, Journal of the Econometric Society, 52(6), 1473-1518. Maskin, E., & Riley, J.(1985). Input versus output incentive schemes, Journal of Public Economics, 28(1), 1-23. Matthews, S. (1987). Comparing auctions for risk averse buyers: A buyer’s point of view. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 55(3), 633–646. Mcfee, R., & Mcmillan, J. (1987). Actions and d bidding. Journal and Economic Literature, 25, 699- 738. Merlo, A., & Schotter, A. (1992). Theory and misbehavior of first-price auctions: comment. American Economic Review, 82, 1413–1425. Milgrom P.R. (1989). Auctions and Bidding: A Primer. Journal of Economic Perspectives,3,3-22. Myerson, R. (1981). Optimal auction design. Mathematics of operations research. 6(1), 58–73. Nakajima, D.(2011). First-price auctions, Dutch auctions, and buy-it-now price with Allais paradox bidders. Theoretical Economics, 6, 473-498. Ng, T. Chong,T.,& Du,X. (2010). The value of superstitions. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31, 293-309. Ockenfels, A.,& Selten, R.(2005). Impulse Balance Equilibrium and Feedback in First Price Auctions Games and Economic Behavior, 51, 155-179. Riley, J., & Samuelson, W. (1981). Optimal auctions. The American Economic Review, 71(3), 381-392. Rosar,F. (2014). Secret reserve prices in first-price auctions. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 37, 65-74. Rosenkranz, S., & Schmitz, W. (2007). Reserve prices in auctions as reference points. Journal of Economics, 117, 637–653. Simmons, L. C., & Schindler, R. M. (2003). Cultural superstitions and the price endings used in Chinese advertising. Journal of International Marketing, 11(2), 101-111. Simmons, P (1996). Seller surplus in first price auctions. Economics Letters, 50, 1-5. Smith, E.S. (2011). The intuitive style: Relationships with local/global and verbal/visual styles, gender, and superstitious reasoning. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(3), 263–270. Vickrey, W. (1961). Counterspectulation, auctions and competitive sealed tenders. The Journal of Finance, 16(1), 8-37 Vincent, R. (1995). Bidding off the wall: why reserve prices may be kept secret. Journal of Economics, 65, 575–584. Vyse, Stuart A. (1997). Believing in Magic: The Psychology of Superstition, New York: Oxford University Press. Waehre, K. Harstad, R., & Rothkopf, M. (1998). Auction form preferences of risk-averse bid takers. RAND Journal of Economics, 29(1), 179–192. Wiggans, E.(1989).The Effect of Regret on Optimal Bidding in Auctions. Management Science, 35(6), 685-692. Wong, K., & Yung, L. (2005). Do dragon have better fate. Economic Inquiry, 43(3), 689–697. Woo, C., Horowitz. I., Luk, S., & Lai.A. (2008). Willingness to pay and nuanced cultural cues: Evidence from Hong Kong’s license-plate auction market. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, 35–53 Woo, C.-K., & Kwok, R. H. F. (1994). Vanity, superstition and auction price. Economics Letters, 44(4), 389–395. Wright, P., & Erdal, K.J. (2008). Sport superstition as a function of skill level and task difficulty. Journal of Sport Behavior, 31(2), 187-199.