Amalan kepimpinan instruksional pengetua di sekolah menengah Daerah Penampang, Sabah

This study entitled "Instructional Leadership Practice Among Principals of Secondary Schools in Penampang District, Sabah" is a desceiptive quantitative research to study the level of principals functional instructional leadership practices and its relationship with teachers' work com...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Helan, Lee
Format:	Thesis
Language:	eng eng
Published:	2010
Subjects:	LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
Online Access:	https://etd.uum.edu.my/4725/1/s802632.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/4725/7/s802632_abstract.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-uum-etd.4725
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection	UUM ETD
language	eng eng
advisor	Kassim, Mustapa
topic	LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
spellingShingle	LB2801-3095 School administration and organization Helan, Lee Amalan kepimpinan instruksional pengetua di sekolah menengah Daerah Penampang, Sabah
description	This study entitled "Instructional Leadership Practice Among Principals of Secondary Schools in Penampang District, Sabah" is a desceiptive quantitative research to study the level of principals functional instructional leadership practices and its relationship with teachers' work commitment. Specifically, the study aims to: (i) identify the level of funtional instructional leadership practices among principals of secondary schools in Penampang District; (ii) determine the level of work commitment among teachers of secondary schools in Penampang District; and (iii) identify the relationship between the functional instructional leadership practices of the principals and the work commitment of the teachers in the secondary schools of Penampang District. The study involved a teacher population of 459 people in six national secondary schools in Penampang District, Sabah. A total of 210 teachers were selected using simple random sampling as the research samples. The study used questionnaire as the research instrument, based on the instructional leadership characteristics Model of Hallinger and Murphy (1987). Research data were analyzed descriptively and inferentially using the SPSS 12.0 software. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the frequency, percentage, mean and standard deviation whereas inferential statistics were used to test the research hypotheses using t-test, ANOVA and Pearson Correlation, r. Research findings showed that the level of functional instructional leadership among principals as perceived by teachers and the level of teachers' commitment are high. The relationship between functional instructional leadership and work commitment is moderate, emphasizing on incentives given to teachers only
format	Thesis
qualification_name	masters
qualification_level	Master's degree
author	Helan, Lee
author_facet	Helan, Lee
author_sort	Helan, Lee
title	Amalan kepimpinan instruksional pengetua di sekolah menengah Daerah Penampang, Sabah
title_short	Amalan kepimpinan instruksional pengetua di sekolah menengah Daerah Penampang, Sabah
title_full	Amalan kepimpinan instruksional pengetua di sekolah menengah Daerah Penampang, Sabah
title_fullStr	Amalan kepimpinan instruksional pengetua di sekolah menengah Daerah Penampang, Sabah
title_full_unstemmed	Amalan kepimpinan instruksional pengetua di sekolah menengah Daerah Penampang, Sabah
title_sort	amalan kepimpinan instruksional pengetua di sekolah menengah daerah penampang, sabah
granting_institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department	College of Arts and Sciences (CAS)
publishDate	2010
url	https://etd.uum.edu.my/4725/1/s802632.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/4725/7/s802632_abstract.pdf
_version_	1776103654754877440
spelling	my-uum-etd.47252022-12-24T02:52:29Z Amalan kepimpinan instruksional pengetua di sekolah menengah Daerah Penampang, Sabah 2010 Helan, Lee Kassim, Mustapa College of Arts and Sciences (CAS) Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts and Sciences LB2801-3095 School administration and organization This study entitled "Instructional Leadership Practice Among Principals of Secondary Schools in Penampang District, Sabah" is a desceiptive quantitative research to study the level of principals functional instructional leadership practices and its relationship with teachers' work commitment. Specifically, the study aims to: (i) identify the level of funtional instructional leadership practices among principals of secondary schools in Penampang District; (ii) determine the level of work commitment among teachers of secondary schools in Penampang District; and (iii) identify the relationship between the functional instructional leadership practices of the principals and the work commitment of the teachers in the secondary schools of Penampang District. The study involved a teacher population of 459 people in six national secondary schools in Penampang District, Sabah. A total of 210 teachers were selected using simple random sampling as the research samples. The study used questionnaire as the research instrument, based on the instructional leadership characteristics Model of Hallinger and Murphy (1987). Research data were analyzed descriptively and inferentially using the SPSS 12.0 software. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the frequency, percentage, mean and standard deviation whereas inferential statistics were used to test the research hypotheses using t-test, ANOVA and Pearson Correlation, r. Research findings showed that the level of functional instructional leadership among principals as perceived by teachers and the level of teachers' commitment are high. The relationship between functional instructional leadership and work commitment is moderate, emphasizing on incentives given to teachers only 2010 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/4725/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/4725/1/s802632.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/4725/7/s802632_abstract.pdf text eng public http://lintas.uum.edu.my:8080/elmu/index.jsp?module=webopac-l&action=fullDisplayRetriever.jsp&szMaterialNo=0000797223 masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Abdul Aziz Yusof, 2003. Perubahan & Kepimpinan. Sintok: Universiti Utara Malaysia. Abdullah, H., Ainon, M. 2004. Guru Sebagai Pendorong dalam Darjah. Pahang: PTS Sdn Bhd. Abdullah Ismail (2001). Persepsi Guru Terhadap Kepemimpinan Pengajaran Pengetua-Pengetua Sekolah Menengah Daerah Temerloh dan Bera. Tesis Sarjana Sains: Universiti Pertanian Malaysia. Abdul Sukor, N. R. (2004). Peranan pengalaman mengajar dan hubungan antara komitmen terhadap profesion dengan prestasi kerja. IJMS 11 (Special Issue, 185-196): Universiti Utara Malaysia. Andi Audryanah, M. N. (2007). Kepimpinan Pengajaran dan Efikasi Kendiri Pengetua Sekolah Menengah dan Hubungannya dengan Pencapaian Akademik Sekolah. Tesis: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Asliza, A. K. (2004). Hubungan Tahap Kecerdasan Emosi dengan Tahap Kepuasan Kerja dan Komitmen Terhadap Kerjaya: Satu Kajian Di Kalangan Guru-guru Kaunseling Sekolah Menengah Di Daerah Johor Bahru. Kajian Penyelidikan Sarjana. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Ayob J. (2004). Pengetua Sekolah yang EfektiJ: Siri Pengurusan Sekolah. Betong: PTS Professional Publishing Sdn. Bhd Ayob J. (2005). Pengetua Sekolah yang EfektiJ: Siri Pengurusan Sekolah. Betong: PTS Professional Publishing Sdn. Bhd. Baharom M. (2004). Persepsi Guru-Gguru terhadap Kepimpinan Pengajaran dalam Celik Komputer di Sekolah-Sekolah Negeri Johor. Tesis Ph.D. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Bartell, C. (1990). Outstanding Secondary Principals Reflect on Instructional Leadership. High School Journal. 73(2): 118-128. Basset, G. W., Creme, A. R. dan Walker, W. G. (1974). Headmaster For Better School. St. Lucia: University Queensland Press. Bennet, N. (1995). Managing Profesional Teachers: Middle management in Primary And Secondary Schools. London: Pul Chapman Publishing Ltd. Bivoise, W.D. (1984). Synthesis of Research on the Principal as Instructional Leadership. Educational Leadership. 15-20. Blase, J., dan Blase, J. (1998). Handbook of Instructional Leadership. How Really Good Principals Promote Teaching and Learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Convin. Blase, J. dan Blase, J. (2000). Effective Instructional Leadership: Teachers' Perspectives on How Principals Promote Teaching and Learning in Schools. Journal of Educational Administration 38, 2 130-41. Brown, J., & Sheppard, B. (1996). Leadership: Theory and Practice. Educational Leadership. 44(9): 3. Cawelti, G. (1987). Why Instructional Leaders are so scarce? Educational Leadership. 44(9): 3. Cotton, S. dan Saward, J. (1980). Instructional Leadership Behaviour, dalam Brown, J. dan Sheppard, B., Leadership and Practice Education, Memorial University Of Newfoundland. http://www.stemnet.nf.ca/bsheppard/Unit4e.html (dimuat turun 25 Oktober 2009). Cuban, L. (1984). Transforming the frog into a prince: Effective school research, policy and practice at the district level. Harvard Education Review, 54(2), 129-151. Noor Rezan, M. (2008). Kolokium Kebangsaan Kepimpinan Instruksional. Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. De Bevoise, W. (1984). Synthesis of research on the principal as instructional leader. Educational Leadership, 41, 14-20. Dwyer, D. C. (1986). Understanding The Principal's Contribution to Instruction. Peabody Journal of Education. 63(1): 3-18. Edmonds, R. (1979). Effectives Schools for the Urban Poor. Educational Leadership. 37(1): 15-18 & 20-24. Ferguson, D. H. (1981). The principal as instructional leader. Contemporary Education. 53(3): 163-166. Fletcher, F. (2007). Hubungan Tahap Kecerdasan Emosi dengan Tahap Kepuasan Kerja dan Tahap Komitmen Kerja di Kalangan Guru Bimbingan Kaunseling Sekolah Menengah di Bandaraya Kuching, Sarawak. Tesis Sarjana Pendidikan (Bimbingan dan Kaunseling), Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Fullan, M. (1991). The New Meaning of Education Change. New York: Teachers College Press. Glasman, N. S. (1986). Evaluation-Based Leadership: School Administration dalam Contemporary Perspective. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. Greenfield, W. (1987). Instructional Leadership: Concepts, Issues and Controversies. Newton, MA: Allyn & Bacon, Inc. Hallinger, P., dan Murphy, J. (1985). Instructional Leadership and School Socio-Economic Status: A Preliminary Investigation. Administrator's Notebook. 3l(5): 1-4. Hallinger, P., dan Murphy, J. (1987). Assessing and Developing Principal Instructional Leadership. Education Leadership. 45(1): 54-62. Hallinger, P., dan Taraseina, P. (2001). The Principal's Role as Instructional Leader: A Review of Studies Using the Principal Instructional Management Rating Scale. Kertas kerja dibentangkan dalam Mesyuarat Tahunan American Educational Research Association, Seattle. Hallinger, P. (1992). The Elvolving Role of American Principals: From Managerial to Instructional and Transformational Leaders. Journal of Educational Administration. 30(3): 35-48. Hallinger, P.,Murphy, J., Lester, F. K., dan Linn, R. L. (1987). Instructional Leadership: What an Instructional Leader Does? Peabody Journal of Education. Hallinger, P., dan Heck, R. H. (1996). Reassessing the Principal's Role in School Effectiveness: A Review of Empiral Research, 1980-1 995. Educational Administration Quarterly. 32(1). Hanny, R. (1987). Used but Don't Abuse: The Principals of Instructional Effectiveness. The Clearing House. 60: 209-211. Hussein M. (1993). Kepemimpinan dan Keberkesanan Sekolah. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Hoy, W. K., dan Miskel, C. G. (2001). Educational Administration: Theory, Research, and Practice. Edisi Ke-6. New York: McGraw-Hill. Ishak, M. (2003). Gaya Kepimpinan Transformasi dan Pengajaran. Gaya Manakah yang Diperlukan oleh Pengetua. Jurnal Pengurusan dan Kepimpinan Pendidikan. Jilid 13, Bi1.02. IAB: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Ishak, M. (2004). Apakah yang Tertulis dalam Khazanah Tulisan Ilmiah tentang Tret, Tingkah Laku dan Tindakan yang Diperlukan untuk Menjadi Seorang Pengetua yang Berkesan? Kertas yang dibentangkan dalam Seminar Nasional Pengurusan dan Kepimpinan Pendidikan ke-12. Jefri H. (2004). Kepimpinan Pengajaran PengetudGuru besar dan Kepuasan Guru. Disertasi Sarjana Pendidikan: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Jemaah Nazir Sekolah (2004). Standard Kualiti Pendidikan Malaysia- Sekolah Pernyataan Standard. SKPMI, Edisi Disember, Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Juhana, Z. (2007). Hubung Kait Kesibukan Pengetua dengan Tahap Kepimpinan Pengajaran yang Diamalkan di Sekolah Menengah di Zon Bandar Muar. Tesis Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Kamarudin K. (1989). Kepemimpinan Profesional dalam Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Teks Publising Sdn. Bhd. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (1982). Laporan Jawatan Kuasa Mengkuji Taraf Pelajaran di Sekolah-Sekolah. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Khalid J. (2003). Penyelidikan dalam Pendidikan: Konsep dan Prosedur. Kuala Lumpur: PTS Publication. Krug, S. E. (1990). Instructional Leadership: A Constructivism Perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly. 28(3): 430-443. Larsen, T. J. (1987). Identification of Intructiona1 Leadership Behaviours and the Impact of the Implementation on Academic Achievement. Tesis Ph.D: Universiti Colorado, CO. Leithwood, K. A., dan Montgomery, D. J. (1986). Improving Principal Effectiveness: The Principal Profile. Toronto: OISE Press. Lim C. H. (2007). Penyelidikan Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif dan Kualitatg Kuala Lumpur: Mc Graw Hill. Maheran Malek A. J. (2005), Stress dan Kepuasan Kerja di Kalangan Guru Sekolah Menengah Daerah Tangkak, Negeri Johor Darul Takzim, Tesis Sarjana Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. McClelland, D.C. (1985). Human motivation. Glenview, Illinois: Scotti Foresmen and Company. Mohd Majid K. (1993). Kaedah Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Mohd Majid K. (2004). Kaedah Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Mohd Nor, J. (2004). Kepimpinan Pengajaran Guru Besar, Komitmen dan Kepuasan Kerja Guru: Satu Kajian Perbandingan dan Hubungan antara Sekolah Berkesan dengan Sekolah Tidak Berkesan. Ijazah Doktor Falsafah, Universiti Sains Malaysia. Mortimore, P. (1993). School Effectiveness and Management of Effective Learning and Teaching. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 4(4), 290-310. Mortimore, P. (1995). Key Characteristics of Effective Schools. Kertas kerja dalam Seminar Sekolah Efektif. IAB, Genting Highland, 28 Oktober. Munira M. (2000). Persepsi Guru Terhadap Amalan Konsep Kepimpinan Pengajaran di Kalangan Pentadbir ke Arah Sekolah Berkesan. Tesis Sarjana Pendidikan: Universiti Putra Malaysia. Murphy, J. F., Halingger, P., Weil, M., dan Mitman, A. (1984). Instructional Leadership: A Conceptual Framework. Education Digest. 28-31. Narimah, A. M. (1997). Keberkesanan Kepimpinan Pengajaran Pengetua terhadap Pencapaian Akademik Pelajar. Tesis: Universiti Utara Malaysia. Nasirah, M. (2000). Kepemimpinan Pengajaran ke Arah Kecernerlangan Pencapaian Akademik di Sekolah Menengah Daerah Gombak Selangor. Tesis Sarjana Pendidikan. Tidak diterbitkan: Universiti Malaya. Niece, K. (1989). Instructional Leadership Behaviours: Concepts and Principles for EfSective Principals. NJ: Eaglewood Cliffs. Owens, R. G. (2001). Organizational Behavior in Education: Instructional Leadership and School Reform (Edsi ke-7). Needharn Heights, MA: Allyn. Persell, C. H., dan Cookson, P. W. (1982). The Effective Principal in Action. dalam Manasse, A. L., The Effective Principal: A Research Summary. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary Principals. Peter S. dan Rijeng J. (2000). Instructional Leadership Role of Secondary School in Sarawak. Jurnal Pendidikan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Oktober 2000.6: 22-34. Rahimah, A. (2002). Kepemimpinan Sekolah dalam Menghadapi Millenium Baru. Institut Pengetua. Bangi: Universiti Malaya. Ramaiah, A. L. (1999). Kepimpinan Pendidikan: Cabaran Masa Kini. Petaling Jaya: IBS Buku Sdn. Bhd. Rahil, M., dan Habibah, E. (2002). Psikolgi Pendidikan untuk Perguruan. Selangor: Karisma Publications Sdn. Bhd. Rohana S. (2002). Peranan Pengetua Sebagai Pemimpin Pengajaran: Kajian di Sekolah di Daerah Pontian, Johor. Tesis Sarjana Kepengetuaan. Bangi: Universiti Malaya. Rowden, R. W. (2000). The Relationship between Charismatic Leadership Behaviors and Organizational Commitment. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. 2l(1): 30-35. Rutherford, W. L. (1985). School Principals As Effective Leaders. Indiana: The Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation. 67(1): 31-34. Schultz, D.P. dan Schultz, S.E. (2001). Psychology & Work Today: An Introduction to Industrial and Organizational Psychology. New Jersey: Prentice Halls. Sergiovanni, T. J. (1987). The Principalship: A reflective Practice Perspective. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Sergiovanni, T. J. (1995). The Principalship: A reflective Practice Perspective. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Shafari, M. N. (2001). Kajian Amalan Kepemimpinan Pengajaran Pengetua dari Persepsi Pengetua dan Guru Sekolah Menengah di Kuala Pilah. Tesis Sarjana Sains: Universiti Putra Malaysia. Shahbudin Ngah, M. (1986). Satu Kajian Mengenai Tugas Guru di Dua Buah Sekolah Menengah di Daerah Muar, Johor. Disertasi Sarjana Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur Sharmizawati, S. (2001). Faktor-fakior Tekanan Kerja dan Kesannya kepada Komitmen Terhadap Organisasi. Kajian ke Atas Pekerja Operator Pengeluaran, PERSTIMA Berhad. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia: Tesis Sarjana Muda Shahrom, S. (1999). Persepsi Guru-guru terhadap Kepimpinan Pengajaran Pengetua Sepatut dan Sebenar di Sebuah Sekolah Menengah Daerah Kulai. Tesis Sarjana: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Sharifah M. N., dan Azizah, A. R. (1988). Penyediaan Pengajaran Sebagai Satu Ciri Kepimpinan Profesional. Kertas Kerja yang dibentang dalam Konvensyen Pendidikan Nasional Ke-6. Kuala Lumpur, 18 Mei. Short, P. M. dan Spencer, W. A. (1990). Principal Instructional Leadership. Journal of Research and Development in Education. Sidek Mohd Noh, (2002). Reka Bentuk Penyelidikan Falsafah, Teori dan Praktis. Selangor: Universiti Putera Malaysia. Smith, W., & Andrews, R. (1990). Instructional Leadership: How Principals Make a Difference. Alexandria, VA: ASCM. Southworth, G. (2002). Instructional leadership in Schools: Reflections and Empirical Evidence. School Leadership and Management, 22(1), 73-92. Steers, R. M. (1985). Introduction To Organizational Behavior. Glenview, III: Scott Foresman. Teng, L. K. dan Zaidatul Akmaliah, L. P. (2004). Persepsi Guru terhadap Kepimpinan Pengetua: Implikasi dalam Pengurusan Sekolah Bestari. Jurnal Teknologi 41(E), Disember, 11-32. Weick, K. (1976). Supervision For Better Schools. Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice-Hall. Wellisch, J. B. (1978). School Management and Organization in Successful Schools. Sociology Of Education. 51: 211-216. YukI,G.A. (2002). Leadership in Organizations (Edisi Ke-5). Upper Saddle River, IVJ: Prentice. Zaidatol A. dan Lope P. (1990). Pentadbiran Pendidikan. Petaling Jaya: Fajar Bakti

Amalan kepimpinan instruksional pengetua di sekolah menengah Daerah Penampang, Sabah

Similar Items