Gaya pembelajaran dan jantina dengan pencapaian akademik dalam kalangan pelajar tingkatan empat di Mukim Tendong, Pasir Mas, Kelantan

Gaya pembelajaran dan jantina dengan pencapaian akademik dalam kalangan pelajar tingkatan empat di Mukim Tendong, Pasir Mas, Kelantan

This study aimed to examine gender and learning styles and academic achievement. The study was conducted in four secondary schools in Mukim Tendong, Pasir Mas, Kelantan. Among the objectives of the study was to identify gender differences based on the five learning styles and to identify relationshi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zalmimi, Ibrahim
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
Published: 2010
Subjects:
LB Theory and practice of education
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/4726/1/s800698.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4726/2/s800698_abstract.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.4726
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
advisor Veloo, Arsaythamby
topic LB Theory and practice of education
spellingShingle LB Theory and practice of education
Zalmimi, Ibrahim
Gaya pembelajaran dan jantina dengan pencapaian akademik dalam kalangan pelajar tingkatan empat di Mukim Tendong, Pasir Mas, Kelantan
description This study aimed to examine gender and learning styles and academic achievement. The study was conducted in four secondary schools in Mukim Tendong, Pasir Mas, Kelantan. Among the objectives of the study was to identify gender differences based on the five learning styles and to identify relationships between the five learning style and academic achievement. Dependent variables in this study is academic achievement. While the independent variable consists of five factors of gender and learning styles are examined. The study was conducted on 280 students from four of the total student population of 1038 people. Design of the study is descriptive method by using descriptive statistical comparison of frequencies and percentages. Instrument study was a questionnaire which has three parts consisting of part A part B and C. Survey results were analyzed using computer software Statistical Packages for Social Science (SPSS) version 12.0. Data were analyzed to determine differences between gender and learning sty:es using t-test and Pearson correlation test was to determine the relationship between learning style and academic achievement. Results showed that learning styles and gender are significant differences between males and females. This study provides an understanding that female students overcome learning styles of boys from the overall mean obtained. The results of analysis of the relationship of learning styles and academic achievement results showed that there was a significant correlation between environmental and sociological aspects of academic achievement. Accordingly, the proposed further research be conducted with focus on the broader learning styles and their relation to academic achievement to a range of schools as to whether a gender schools, fully residential schools, national-type schools and other educational institutions before engaging any of the policies and policy
format Thesis
qualification_name masters
qualification_level Master's degree
author Zalmimi, Ibrahim
author_facet Zalmimi, Ibrahim
author_sort Zalmimi, Ibrahim
title Gaya pembelajaran dan jantina dengan pencapaian akademik dalam kalangan pelajar tingkatan empat di Mukim Tendong, Pasir Mas, Kelantan
title_short Gaya pembelajaran dan jantina dengan pencapaian akademik dalam kalangan pelajar tingkatan empat di Mukim Tendong, Pasir Mas, Kelantan
title_full Gaya pembelajaran dan jantina dengan pencapaian akademik dalam kalangan pelajar tingkatan empat di Mukim Tendong, Pasir Mas, Kelantan
title_fullStr Gaya pembelajaran dan jantina dengan pencapaian akademik dalam kalangan pelajar tingkatan empat di Mukim Tendong, Pasir Mas, Kelantan
title_full_unstemmed Gaya pembelajaran dan jantina dengan pencapaian akademik dalam kalangan pelajar tingkatan empat di Mukim Tendong, Pasir Mas, Kelantan
title_sort gaya pembelajaran dan jantina dengan pencapaian akademik dalam kalangan pelajar tingkatan empat di mukim tendong, pasir mas, kelantan
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department College of Arts and Sciences (CAS)
publishDate 2010
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/4726/1/s800698.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4726/2/s800698_abstract.pdf
_version_ 1747827788283379712
spelling my-uum-etd.47262015-07-05T06:52:08Z Gaya pembelajaran dan jantina dengan pencapaian akademik dalam kalangan pelajar tingkatan empat di Mukim Tendong, Pasir Mas, Kelantan 2010 Zalmimi, Ibrahim Veloo, Arsaythamby College of Arts and Sciences (CAS) Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts and Sciences LB Theory and practice of education This study aimed to examine gender and learning styles and academic achievement. The study was conducted in four secondary schools in Mukim Tendong, Pasir Mas, Kelantan. Among the objectives of the study was to identify gender differences based on the five learning styles and to identify relationships between the five learning style and academic achievement. Dependent variables in this study is academic achievement. While the independent variable consists of five factors of gender and learning styles are examined. The study was conducted on 280 students from four of the total student population of 1038 people. Design of the study is descriptive method by using descriptive statistical comparison of frequencies and percentages. Instrument study was a questionnaire which has three parts consisting of part A part B and C. Survey results were analyzed using computer software Statistical Packages for Social Science (SPSS) version 12.0. Data were analyzed to determine differences between gender and learning sty:es using t-test and Pearson correlation test was to determine the relationship between learning style and academic achievement. Results showed that learning styles and gender are significant differences between males and females. This study provides an understanding that female students overcome learning styles of boys from the overall mean obtained. The results of analysis of the relationship of learning styles and academic achievement results showed that there was a significant correlation between environmental and sociological aspects of academic achievement. Accordingly, the proposed further research be conducted with focus on the broader learning styles and their relation to academic achievement to a range of schools as to whether a gender schools, fully residential schools, national-type schools and other educational institutions before engaging any of the policies and policy 2010 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/4726/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/4726/1/s800698.pdf text eng validuser https://etd.uum.edu.my/4726/2/s800698_abstract.pdf text eng public http://lintas.uum.edu.my:8080/elmu/index.jsp?module=webopac-l&action=fullDisplayRetriever.jsp&szMaterialNo=0000802893 masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Alias, B. dan Chong, M. L. (1992). Hubungan di antara stail kognitif dengan jantina, aliran dan kesannya terhadap pencapaian akademik pelajar. Jurnal Pendidikan, 17, 61-73. Alias Baba. (1999). Statistik Penyelidikon dalam Pendidikon dan Sains Sosial. Bangi: Penerbit UKM. Alias Baba. (1999). Research statistic in social science education. Bangi: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Asiah Hj. Panekutty. (1999). Gaya pembelajaran dan pencapaian akademik pelajar Tingkatan 4 Sekolah Menengah Teknik Juasseh, Kuala Pilah, Negeri Sembilan, Darul Khusus. Tesis Sarjana. Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur. Atan Long (1988). Psikologi Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa & Pustaka. Ary, D., Jacob, L., C.Razavieh, A., & Sorensen, C. (2006). Introduction to research in education (7th ed.) USA: Thomas Higher Education. Azizi Hj. Yahaya dan Shareeza Abdul Karim. (2003). Gaya Pembelajaran dengan Pencapaian Akademik Pelajar di Tingkatan Empat Sekolah Menengah Teknik N. Sembilan. National Seminar Mernperkasakan Sistem Pendidikan, Puteri Pan-Pacific, Johore bahru, 19-21. Baharin Abu (2000). Teaching Effectiveness and Staf Professional Development Programmes in HEI in Malaysia. Published Doctoral Thesis, The University of Birmingham, UK. Baharin Abu, Othrnan Md Johan, Syed Mohd Shafeq Mansor dan Haliza Jaafar. (2007). Kepelbagaian Gaya Pembelajaran dan Kemahiran Belajar Pelajar Universiti di Fakulti Pendidikan, UTM Johor. Research Vote No: 71881. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor. Bass, G.M. dan Greay, W.T. (1996). Education Research Abstracts. Accounting Education, (1), 238-242. Bartlett, J.E, Kotrlik, J.W. & Higgins C.C. (2001). Organizational Research: Determining Appropriate Sample Size in Survey Research. Informational Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 19(1). Busato,V.V, Rins, F.J., Elshout, J.J & Hamaker, C. (2000). Intellectual Ability, Learning Style, Personality, Achievement Motivation and Academic Success of Psychology Students in Higher Education. Journal of Personality and Individual Differences. 29(6): 1057-1068. Cates, W.M. (1985). A Practical Guide to Educational Research (Ed. (1)). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc. DeBello, T.C. (1990). Comparison of eleven major learning styles model: Variables, appropriete populations, validity of instrumentation, and research behind them. Journal of Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities International 6(3): 203-222. Dunn, R. (1984). Learning Style: State of The Science. Journal Of Higher Education. 23(1): 10-19. Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. (1978). Teaching Student Through Their Individual Learning Styles: The Centre for the Stu4 of Learning and Teaching Styles. St. John's University. Jamaica, New York. Dunn, R. & Dunn, K. (1978). Teaching Students Through Their Individual Learning Styles : A Practical Approach. Reston, VA: Reston Publishing Company Inc. Dunn, R & Price, A(1985). Learning Styles Inventory. The Journal of Educational Research 80(4): 192-212. Fooster, V. (2000)Gender, schooling achievement and post-school pathway: beyond statics and populist discourse dlm T. Maxwell. (Eds). Teaching in Context. Canberra: ACER. Felder, R.M. (1993). Reaching the second tier: Learning and Teaching styles in college science education. Journal of College Science Teaching. 23(5): 286-290. Garger, S. dan Guild, P. (1984).Learning Style: The Crucial Differences. Curiculum Review, 23(1), 9-12. Godleski, E.S. (1984). Learning Style Compatibility of Engineering Students and Faculty. Proceedings Annual Frontiers In Education Conference, ASEE/IEEE, Philadelphia, 362. Goleman, Daniel (2000). Emotional Intellligence (terjemahan). Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Halpin, A.W. (1957). Manual for the leader behavior description questionnaire. Ohio: The Ohio State University. Haynes, M.E. (1989). Make Every Minute Count, How To Manage Your Time 91 Effectively. London: Crisp Publication. Heide, H. (2002). Comparative Analysis of the Learning Styles of German Versus Other Adolescents from Diverse Nations by Age, Gender and Academic Achievement Level. Dissertations Project: St John's University, School of Education and Human Services. Hlawaty, H. (2009). Lernen and Learning Styles: A comparative analysis of the learning styles of German adolescents by age, gender, and academic achievement level. European Education 40(4): 23-45. Hii Siong Ting (2006). Gaya Pembelajaran Sains Tahun 5 Fakulti Pendidikan, UTM. Tesis Sarjana Muda. UTM, Johor. Honey, P. & Mumford, A. (1992b). The Manual Of Learning Styles. Edisi Kedua. United Kingkom: Peter Honey. Honey, P. & Mumford, .4. (1992a). Using your Learning Styles. Maidenhead: Peter Honey. Honey, P. Mumford A. (1992). The Manual of Learning Styles 3rd Ed. Maidenhead, Peter Honey. Hyeok Kang (1999). Learning Style Preferences Of Korean High School Students. Thesis Sarjana. Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur. Knowles, M. S. & Associates. (1984). Andragogy in action. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Krimsky, J. (1982). A Comparative study of the effects of matching and mismatching fourth grade student with learning style preferences for the environmental elements of light and their subsequent reading speed and accuracy score. Student learning style and brain behavior. 8-17. Kerlinger, F. N. (1986). Foundation of behavioural research. (8th ed). Fort Worth, Texas: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Kopsovich, R.D. (2001). A Study of correlations between learning styles of students and their mathematics scores on the Texas assessment of academic skills test. Disertasi. University of North Texas. Low Xin Xin (2003). Pola Gaya Pembelajaran Pelajar-pelajar Di Kelas Lukisan Kejuruteraan Sekolah Menengah Sains Muar. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia: Laporan PSM. Tidak diterbitkan. Maryana Adam. (2006). Gaya Pembelajaran Pelajar Tingkatan Empat (Aliran Sains) di 3 buah Sekolah Daerah Kluang, Johor Darul Takzim Berdasarkan Model. Dunn & Dunn. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia: Skudai, Johor. McKenna, E. (1997). Gender Differences in Reading Attitudes. ERIC Document No: ED407653. Milglietti, C.L & Strange, C.C. (1998). Learning Style, classroom environment preferences, teaching styles, and remedial course outcomes for underprepared adults at a two-year college. Comminity College Review. 26-35. Mohamad Zailani Jaya. (2001). Kecenderungan Gaya Pembelajaran Guru PeIatih Tahun Dua Maktab-Makiab Perguruan di Sarawak. FakuIti Pendidikan: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor. Mohd. Najib Ghafar (1998). Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Skudai: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Mohd. Nor Ihkasan & Hazwani Sapar. (2007). Gaya Pembelajaran di Kalangan Pelajar-Pelajar Sarjana Muda Pendidikan Teknik dan Vokasional di Universiti Tun Hussein Onn. Fakulti Pendidikan Teknikal: Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia. Naina Mohd B. Md. Noor. (2000). Stail Pengajaran Guru Dan Gaya Pembelajaran Murid. Jurnal Pendidikan Tigaenf: Maktab Perguruan Sultan Idris Abdul Halim, Sungai Petani, Kedah; Jilid 2: Bil 3. Norlia Abd. Aziz, T. Subahan M. Meerah, Lilia Halim, Kamisah Osman. (2006). Hubungan Antara Motivasi, Gaya Pembelajaran Dengan Pencapaian Matematik Tambahan Pelajar Tingkatan 4. Jurnal Pendidikan. (31): 123-141. Nor Azlah Sham Rambely (2035). Hubungan Antara Demografi, Afektif Dan Pencapaian Dalam Kursus Kenegaraan, Tesis Sarjana, Fakulti Sains dan Pendidikan, Universiti Utara Malaysia: April Norihan Abu Bakar.(2001). Hubungan antara Gaya Pembelajaran dengan Pencapaian dalam matematik Jurnal Pendidikan. (20): 44-68. Norlia Abd. Aziz, T. Subahan M. Meerah, Lilia Halim & Kamisah Osman (2006). Hubungan Antara Motivasi, Gaya Pembelajaran Dengan Pencapaian Matematik Tambahan Pelajar Tingkatan 4. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Jurnal Pendidikan. (31): 123-141. Oppenheim, A.N. (1983). Questionnaire design and Attitude Measurement. London: Heinemann Educational Books Ltd. Oxford, R., Ehrman, M. dan Lavine, R. (1991). Style Wars: Teacher-Student Style Conflicts in the Language Classroom. In Magnan, S. (ed.). Challenges in the 1990's for College Foreign Language Programs. Boston: Heinle and Heinle. Picou, A., Gatlin-Watts, R. & Packer, J. (1998). A Test for Learning Style Differences for the U.S. Border Population. ERIC Document No: ED423678. Quellete, R. .(2000). Learning Styles in Adult Education. University of Maryland. Sadler-Smith. E. (1996). Approaches to studying: Age, gender and academic performance. Educational Studies 22(3): 367-379. Santhi Suppiah (1998). Perbandingan Strategi Belajar pelajar-pelajar Aliran Sains dan Sastera Sekolah Menengah Methodist Kuala Lumpur." Universiti Teknologi Malaysia: Projek Sarjana. Sekaran, U. ( 1992). Research Methods For Business: A Skill Building Approach. John Wiley & Sons Inc. Shaw, G. & Nigel, M. (1999). The Role of Student Learning Style, Gender, Attitudes and Perceptions on Information and Communication Technology Assisted Learning. Journal of Computers and Education. California College of Pediatric Medicine San Francisco. 33(4) 223-234. Sureshkumar A/L Kesavalu (2005). Hubungan Diantara Gaya Pembelajaran Dengan Pencapaian Akademik Pelajar Sarjana Muda Teknologi Serta Pendidikan Di UTM Dalam Matapelajaran Teknologi Pengeluaran Asas. Tesis Sarjana Muda. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor. Teh Su Hooi. (2006). Gaya Pembelajaran, Kemahiran Belajar Dan Masalah Belajar Pelajar 5 Spa/E/J/H Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Tesis Sarjana Muda. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor. Tumerah Rosmin. (1998). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi gaya pembelajaran dan kesannya terhadap pencapaian akademik. Projek Sarjana Sains (Pengurusan). Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok. Yee Mei Heong (2002). Pola Gaya Pembelajaran Di Kalangan Pelajar Sekolah Menengah Teknik di Daerah Negeri Johor. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia: Laporan PSM. Tidak diterbitkan. Younger, M. & Warrington, M. (2000). Student Attitudes, Images and The Gender Gap. British Educational Research Journal 26(3): 393-407. Zikmund, W.G (1991). Business Research Methods, Fort Mount: Dryden

Similar Items