Hubungan gaya pembelajaran dengan pencapaian Sains

The study examines the relations between students' learning styles and achievement in Science subject. The sample of the research consisted of 200 respondents which 91 respondents belong to male student while the others 109 belongings to female students. The study employed a set of questionnair...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Che Azizon, Che Yusof
Format:	Thesis
Language:	eng eng
Published:	2009
Subjects:	LB1025-1050.75 Teaching (Principles and practice)
Online Access:	https://etd.uum.edu.my/4752/1/s87228.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/4752/2/s87228_abstract.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-uum-etd.4752
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection	UUM ETD
language	eng eng
advisor	Veloo, Arsaythamby
topic	LB1025-1050.75 Teaching (Principles and practice)
spellingShingle	LB1025-1050.75 Teaching (Principles and practice) Che Azizon, Che Yusof Hubungan gaya pembelajaran dengan pencapaian Sains
description	The study examines the relations between students' learning styles and achievement in Science subject. The sample of the research consisted of 200 respondents which 91 respondents belong to male student while the others 109 belongings to female students. The study employed a set of questionnaire measuring on students' different learning styles using four point scales. The three categories of learning styles by Dunn and Dunn Models (1978) are Emotional (motivation, persistence, responsibility and structure), Sociological (self, pair, peers, pair and adult) and Physical (perceptual, intake, time and mobility). Its shows female students more prefer on motivation, persistence, responsible rather than male students. In studies Sciences, female students also prefer to pair and group studies. The research data is analyzed based ANOVA and Pearson correlation analysis. The results obtained shows that female respondents prefer to apply Emotional and Sociological category as a learning style in Science subject. The finding shows that female students have high motivation, high persistence, responsible and like clear structure instruction. Female student are prefer to study in pair and group compared to male students in science subject. The results obtained shows that the learning styles is different significantly with the respondents' gender. Results also show that the different learning styles by students have no correlation with students' academic achievement. This research will helped school administration, student, parent and Ministry of Education to improved suitable teaching styles with learning styles to produce excellent students
format	Thesis
qualification_name	masters
qualification_level	Master's degree
author	Che Azizon, Che Yusof
author_facet	Che Azizon, Che Yusof
author_sort	Che Azizon, Che Yusof
title	Hubungan gaya pembelajaran dengan pencapaian Sains
title_short	Hubungan gaya pembelajaran dengan pencapaian Sains
title_full	Hubungan gaya pembelajaran dengan pencapaian Sains
title_fullStr	Hubungan gaya pembelajaran dengan pencapaian Sains
title_full_unstemmed	Hubungan gaya pembelajaran dengan pencapaian Sains
title_sort	hubungan gaya pembelajaran dengan pencapaian sains
granting_institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department	College of Arts and Sciences (CAS)
publishDate	2009
url	https://etd.uum.edu.my/4752/1/s87228.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/4752/2/s87228_abstract.pdf
_version_	1747827793590222848
spelling	my-uum-etd.47522015-07-15T07:32:34Z Hubungan gaya pembelajaran dengan pencapaian Sains 2009 Che Azizon, Che Yusof Veloo, Arsaythamby College of Arts and Sciences (CAS) Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts and Sciences LB1025-1050.75 Teaching (Principles and practice) The study examines the relations between students' learning styles and achievement in Science subject. The sample of the research consisted of 200 respondents which 91 respondents belong to male student while the others 109 belongings to female students. The study employed a set of questionnaire measuring on students' different learning styles using four point scales. The three categories of learning styles by Dunn and Dunn Models (1978) are Emotional (motivation, persistence, responsibility and structure), Sociological (self, pair, peers, pair and adult) and Physical (perceptual, intake, time and mobility). Its shows female students more prefer on motivation, persistence, responsible rather than male students. In studies Sciences, female students also prefer to pair and group studies. The research data is analyzed based ANOVA and Pearson correlation analysis. The results obtained shows that female respondents prefer to apply Emotional and Sociological category as a learning style in Science subject. The finding shows that female students have high motivation, high persistence, responsible and like clear structure instruction. Female student are prefer to study in pair and group compared to male students in science subject. The results obtained shows that the learning styles is different significantly with the respondents' gender. Results also show that the different learning styles by students have no correlation with students' academic achievement. This research will helped school administration, student, parent and Ministry of Education to improved suitable teaching styles with learning styles to produce excellent students 2009 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/4752/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/4752/1/s87228.pdf text eng validuser https://etd.uum.edu.my/4752/2/s87228_abstract.pdf text eng public http://lintas.uum.edu.my:8080/elmu/index.jsp?module=webopac-l&action=fullDisplayRetriever.jsp&szMaterialNo=0000803870 masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Abdul Aziz Ismail (2001). Gaya Pembelajaran Pelajar Dengan Pencapaian Subjek Geografi Di Sekolah Menengah. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Abdul Ghani Awang (1996). Kemahiran Belajar Di Institusi Pengajian Tinggi. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa Dan Pustaka. Abu Hassan Kassim (2003). Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran Kimia di Sekolah. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Arsaythamby,V., (2006). Bias Ujian Aneka Pilihan Matematik KBSM Berdasarkan Perbezaan KBSM Individu dan Orientasi Pembelajaran. Tesis PhD, Universiti Utara Malaysia. Atan Long (1998). Psikologi Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa & Pustaka. Azizi Yahaya & Shahrin Hashim (2007). Kepelbagaian Gaya Pembelajaran Dan Kemahiran Belajar Pelajar Universiti. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Azizi Yahaya, Shareeza Abdul Karim & Noordin Yahaya (2003). Hubungan Gaya Pembelajaran Dengan Pencapaian Akademik Pelajar Di Sekolah Menengah Teknik, Negeri Sembilan. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Azizi Yahaya, Yusof Boon, Sharin Hashim & Wan Zuraidah Wan Hamid (2003). Hubungan Di Antara Gaya Pembelajaran Dengan Pencapaiun Akademik Pelajar. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Baharin Abu (2000). Teaching Efectiveness and Staf Professional Development Programmes in HEI in Malaysia. Published Doctoral Thesis, The University of Birmingham, UK. Baharin Aby Othrnan Md Johan, Syed Mohd Syafeq Mansor & Haliza Jaafar (2007). Kepelbagaian Gaya Pernbelajaran Dan Kemahiran Belajar Pelajar Universiti. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Biggs, J. B. (1976). Dimensions of study behaviour: another look at ATI. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, ms. 68-80. Braio, A., R. Durn, T. M. Beasley, P. Quinn, and K. Buchanan (1997). Incremental implementation of learning style strategies among urban low achievers. Journal of Educational Research, 91(1), ms. 15-25. Bryce, N. (2002). Standing Naked In The Shower, Mesa, Arizona: Insight Learning Foundation. Cheryl, J., Carla, R. & Kouider Mokhtari (2003). Are Student Learning Styles Discipline Specific?. Community College Journal of Researches and Practice, 27, ms.363-375. Cofffield, F. J. & Moesely (2004). Learning Styles And Pedagogy In Post-16 Learning: A systemic And Critical Review. London: Learning Skills Research Centre. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achiement: A review of state policy evidence. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1), ms.2-50. Dunn & Dunn (1978). Teaching Students Through Their Individual Learning Styles: A Practical Approach. New York.: The 14 Annual Leadership Institute. Dunn, R. & K. Dunn. (1992). Teaching elementary students through their individual learning styles. Boston: Ally & Bacon. Dunn, R., Dunn, K., & Price, G.E. (2000). Learning Style Inventory. Lawrence, Kansas: Price Systems. Dunn, R., S. A. Griggs, J. Olson, B. Gorman & M. Beasley (1995) A meta-analytic validation of the Dunn and Dunn model of learning-style preferences. Journal of Educational Research 88(6), ms. 353-361. Ee Ah Meng (1995). Murid dan Proses Pembelajaran Asas Pendidikan 2. Shah Alam: Fajar Bakti Sdn Bhd. Entwistle, N. J. & Kozeki, B. (1985). Relationships between school motivation approaches ti studying and attainment among British and Hungarian adolescents. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 55, ms. 124-137. Eisa M. Al Balhan (2007). Learning Style in Relation to Academic Performance in Middleschool Mathematics. Kuwait University. Faizah Mohd Ghazali. (1999). Kesan pembelajaran koperatifmenggunakan alat ujian pencapaian dalam matematik. Projek Penyelidikan Sarjana Pendidikan. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Felder, R. M., Felder, G. N. & Dietz, E. J. (2002). The Effects of Personality on Engineering Student Performance and Attitudes. Journal of Engineering Education, 9(1), ms.3-17. Felder, R. M. & Henriques E. R. (1995). Learning and Teaching Styles in Foreign and Second Language Education, Foreign Language Annals, 28(1), ms. 21-30. Felder, R. M. & Spurlin (2005). Application, realibility, and validity of the Index of Learning styles. International Journal of Engineering Education, 21(1), ms. 103-112. Griggs, S.A.(1985). Counseling Student Through Their Individual Learning Style. ERIG, The National Institute of Education, The University of Michigan. Gomez, J. (2000). Gaya Pembelajaran: Satu Tinjauan Literatur. Jurnal Pendidikan Tiganef 2000, 18(1), ms. 226-231. Hargreave, D.J. (1996). How Undergraduate Students Learn. European Journal of Engineering Education, 21(4), ms. 425-434. Hinson, M. B. (2000). Utilizing The Dunn And Dunn Style Model In Development Of Instuction. Florida: University Of West Florida. Honey, P. & Mumford, A (1992). The Manual of Learning Style. (2nd ed.), United Kingdom: Peter Honey. Honingsfeld, A., & Lister D. (2003). Learning Styles of Bermudian Adolescents. In R. Dunn & S. Griggs (Eds.), Synthesis on the Dunn and Dunn learning style model research: Who, what, when, where and so what (pp. 123-130) Jamaica, NY: St John's University's Center for the Study of Learning and Teaching Styles. Hsin T. S. & George. A (2008). Enhancing Excellence and Equity in Schooling: Modality Theory, an International Perspective. Educational Research Quarterly, 221(1), ms. 29-47. Ibrahim Abu Samah (1995). Keselesaan Dan Persepsi Pelajar Luar Bandar Terhadap Sumber Manusia Di Sarawak. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. International Learning Styles Network. (2008). http://www.learning styles.net. Dicapai pada 30 Disember 2008. Jackson P. W & Tatezig, J. W (1956). Psychological Health and Classroom Functioning : A Study of Dissatisfaction With School Among Adolecents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, ms. 295-300. Kafka, M. A. (2000). Effects of strucked vs.non-structured learning on achievement and attitudes of fifth grades (Doctoral dissertation, St. John's University). Dissertation Abstract International, 62(8), 2672A. Keefe, J . (1982). Student Learning Styles And Brain Behavior: Programmes, Instrumentation, Research. Reston VA: National Association Of Secondary School Principals. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience As The Source Of Learning And Development. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc., Eaglewood Cliffs. Lahaderne, H. W. (1967). Scholastic Success and Attitude Toward School in a Population, of sixth-Grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 58(1), ms. 560-584 Lee Guak Earn. (1 999). Pembelajaran hperatif dan kesannya ke atas pencapaian kemahiran penyelesaian masalah Matematik Teras Tingkatan 4 di sebuah sekolah di Daerah Kota Setar, Kedah, Malaysia. Projek Penyelidikan Ijazah Sarjana Pendidikan Universiti Sains Malaysia. Lena, A. (2005). Educational Measurement The Attitude of Swedish Girls and Boys to Physics And Mathematics. Educational Measurement Swedish. Lovelace, M. K (2005). A meta-analysis of experimental research based on the Dunn and Dunn learning-style model, 1980-2000. Journal of Educational Research, 98(3) ms. 83- 176. Low Xin Xin (2003). Pola Gaya Pembelajaran Pelajar-pelajar Di Kelas Lukisan Kejuruteraan Sekolah Menengah Sains Muar. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia: Laporan PSM. Tidak diterbitkan. Malaysia, (2002). Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan (BPPDP) Kuala Lumpur. Kajian Kepada Pelajar Aliran Sains Berprestasi Rendah dalarn Mata Pelajaran Sains Tulen. Malaysia, (2009). Unit Penilaian dan Peperiksaan, Jabatan Pelajaran Negeri Kelantan. Marsh, G. E. & Tapia M. (2002). Feeling Good About Mathematics. United States Department of Education. Maznah Ismail & Yoong San (1995). Kajian terhadap pembelajaran pendidikan. Journal Pendidik & Pendidikan, 14, ms. 11-18. Miller, A. (1991). Personality types, learning styles and educational goals, Educational Psychology, 11(34), ms. 217-37. Mohd Naj ib Abdul Ghaffar (1999). Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Skudai: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Norashikin Arif & Zuhaidi Mukrim (2005). Proses Pembelajaran Dan Hubungan Dengan Pencapaian Matematik. Perak: Kolej Matrikulasi Perak. Norsiah, H. (1998). Pengaruh Sikap Dan Latar Belakang Asas Akademik Ke Atas Pencapaian Pelajar Dalam Mata Pelajaran Kimia. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Nor Azizah Mohd Salleh. (1996). Penerapan nilai murni dalarn Biologi melalui pembelajaran koperatif. Prosiding Seminar Kebangsaan Pendidikan Sains & Matematik, Fakulti Pendidikan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 20-21 November. Prasanthi Pallapu (2007). Effects Of Visual And Verbal Learning Styles On Learning. Institute For Learning Styles Journal, 31(12), ms. 150-163. Rahaiza Ismail (2001). Pelajar lelaki Hilang Kredibiliti?. Majalah MASSA. Pizzo, J. (1981). An investigation ofthe relationships between 120 selected acoustic environments and sound, an element of learning style, as they affect sixthgrade students' reading achievement and attitudes. (Doctoral dissertation, St. John's University). Dissertation Abstracts International, 42, 2475A. Reichmann, S. W. & Grasha, A. F. (1974). A rational approach to developing and assessing the construct validity of a study learning styles scale inventory. Journal of Psychology, 87(2), ms. 213-223. Sadler-Smith, E. (1996). Approaches to studying: age, gender and academic performance. Educational Studies, 22(3), ms. 367-379. Santhi Suppiah (1998). Satu Tinjauan Terhadap Perbandingan Strategi Belajar Bagi Pelajar-pelajar Aliran Sains Tingkatan Empat Sekolah Menengah (P) Methodish Kuala Lumpur. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia: Laporan PSM. Tidak diterbitkan. Schmeck, E. (1983). Development of a self-report inventory for assessing individual difference in learning processes. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, ms. 415-431. Sgoutas, S. A., Eric Nagel E. & Scott F. (2005). Correlates of Performance in Biological Psychology: How Can We Help? University of San Diego. Journal of Intructional Psychology 34(1), ms. 46-52. Siti Hawa Munji (1989). Strategi Belajar: Lulus Peperiksaan. Kuala Lumpur: Usaha C & L Sdn. Bhd. Shabuddin Hashim & Dr. Rohizani Yaakub (2004). Siri Pendidihn: Psikologi Pembelajaran Dan Personaliti. Pulau Pinang : USM 1(29), ms. 48-77. Subahan Mohd Meerah (1999). Dampak Penyelidikan Pembelajaran Sains terhadap Pembahan Kurikulum. Syarahan Perdana Jawatan Profesor Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, pada pada 10 Julai 1999 di UKM, Bangi. Tasir (2003). Belajar Cara Belajar. Wichita, Kansas: Instrumen Gaya Pembelajaran, Murdoch Teacher Center. Taylor, B.M. & Maruyama, G. (1990). Time Spent Reading And Reading Growth. American Educational Research Journal, 5(3), ms. 351-362. Wang, K. H. (2006). Learning Styles and Formative Assessment Strategy: Enhancing Student Achievement In Web-Based Learning. Taiwan: National Changhua University Of Education. Watkin, D. A & Po Yin Drew (1998), Affective Variable, learning approaches and academic achievement: a caused modeling investigation with Hong Kong tertiary students. British Journal of Education Psychology, 68, ms. 173-188. Wiley, D.E. and Harnischfeger, A. (1974). Explosion Of A Myth: Quality Of School and Exposure to Lnstruction. Educational Researcher, 10(3), ms. 7-12. Yee Cheng Tei k. (1995). Kesan Pembelaj aran koperatif terhadap pencapaian dan kemahiran penyelesaian masalah dikalangan pelajar Tg. 4 di sebuah sekolah menengah di Malaysia. Tesis Sarjana Pendidikan. Universiti Sains Malaysia. Yong, F. L. & McIntyre, J. D. (1992). A comparative study of the learning style preferences of students with learning disabilities and studens who are gifted. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25(2), ms. 124-132. Yufiza Mohd Yusof (2005). Gaya Pembelajaran dan Hubungannya Dengan Pencapaian Pelajar Perakaunan. Perak: Kolej Matrikulasi Perak. Zywno, M. S. & Waalen, J. K. (2002). The effects of individual learning styles on student outcomes in technology-enabled education. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 6(1), ms. 35-43.

Hubungan gaya pembelajaran dengan pencapaian Sains

Similar Items