Using graphic organizer in helping year five pupils to comprehend the small 'I'

Graphic organizers are structural tools that help readers organize thoughts. By using graphic organizers, pupils can experience words beyond pronunciation and display connections between ideas and concepts to improve comprehension. Graphic organizers help pupils sort, show relationship, make meanin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hiew, Mei Ping
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
Published: 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/4796/1/s802634.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4796/2/s802634_abstract.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.4796
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
advisor Mohd Yusoff, Nurahimah
topic LB1025-1050.75 Teaching (Principles and practice)
spellingShingle LB1025-1050.75 Teaching (Principles and practice)
Hiew, Mei Ping
Using graphic organizer in helping year five pupils to comprehend the small 'I'
description Graphic organizers are structural tools that help readers organize thoughts. By using graphic organizers, pupils can experience words beyond pronunciation and display connections between ideas and concepts to improve comprehension. Graphic organizers help pupils sort, show relationship, make meaning, and manage data quickly and easily before, during, and after reading and discussion. As a result, pupils can display connections between ideas and concept, thus improving the text comprehension. The subjects were primarily Year Five pupils (n = 60) at a suburban school in Kota Kinabalu. The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of using graphic organizers as a learning tool to help Year Five pupils organize thoughts and improve reading comprehension. Using a triangular approach to data collection, this 6 week study utilized a Pre-test and Post-test control group design and individual interviews to determine the effects of graphic organizers on pupils' achievement. The data suggests that using graphic organizers might have been one factor that aided pupils in the reading comprehension process. In addition, 'this study revealed that pupils believed that graphic organizers were helpful in allowing them to organize their thoughts after reading a story. A paired samples t - test determined significant difference in achievement between the groups. The experimental group improved in achievement at least as much as the control group
format Thesis
qualification_name masters
qualification_level Master's degree
author Hiew, Mei Ping
author_facet Hiew, Mei Ping
author_sort Hiew, Mei Ping
title Using graphic organizer in helping year five pupils to comprehend the small 'I'
title_short Using graphic organizer in helping year five pupils to comprehend the small 'I'
title_full Using graphic organizer in helping year five pupils to comprehend the small 'I'
title_fullStr Using graphic organizer in helping year five pupils to comprehend the small 'I'
title_full_unstemmed Using graphic organizer in helping year five pupils to comprehend the small 'I'
title_sort using graphic organizer in helping year five pupils to comprehend the small 'i'
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department College of Arts and Sciences (CAS)
publishDate 2010
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/4796/1/s802634.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4796/2/s802634_abstract.pdf
_version_ 1747827803271725056
spelling my-uum-etd.47962015-07-28T08:35:34Z Using graphic organizer in helping year five pupils to comprehend the small 'I' 2010 Hiew, Mei Ping Mohd Yusoff, Nurahimah College of Arts and Sciences (CAS) Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts and Sciences LB1025-1050.75 Teaching (Principles and practice) Graphic organizers are structural tools that help readers organize thoughts. By using graphic organizers, pupils can experience words beyond pronunciation and display connections between ideas and concepts to improve comprehension. Graphic organizers help pupils sort, show relationship, make meaning, and manage data quickly and easily before, during, and after reading and discussion. As a result, pupils can display connections between ideas and concept, thus improving the text comprehension. The subjects were primarily Year Five pupils (n = 60) at a suburban school in Kota Kinabalu. The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of using graphic organizers as a learning tool to help Year Five pupils organize thoughts and improve reading comprehension. Using a triangular approach to data collection, this 6 week study utilized a Pre-test and Post-test control group design and individual interviews to determine the effects of graphic organizers on pupils' achievement. The data suggests that using graphic organizers might have been one factor that aided pupils in the reading comprehension process. In addition, 'this study revealed that pupils believed that graphic organizers were helpful in allowing them to organize their thoughts after reading a story. A paired samples t - test determined significant difference in achievement between the groups. The experimental group improved in achievement at least as much as the control group 2010 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/4796/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/4796/1/s802634.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/4796/2/s802634_abstract.pdf text eng public http://lintas.uum.edu.my:8080/elmu/index.jsp?module=webopac-l&action=fullDisplayRetriever.jsp&szMaterialNo=0000797300 masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Alberta Learning. (2004). Focus on inquiry: A teacher's guide to implementing inquirybased learning. Edmonton, AB: Alberta Learning. Almasi, J. (2003). Teaching strategic processes in reading. New York, NY: The Guilford Press. Alvermann, D. E., & Boothby, P. R (2000). Children's transfer of graphic organizer instruction. Reading Psychology, 7(2), 87-100. Arthaud, T., & Goracke, T. (2006). Implementing a structured story web and outline strategy to assist struggling readers. Reading Teacher, 59(6), 581-586. Retrieved February 15, 2009, from EBSCHO host database. Barranoik, L. (2001). Research success with senior high school students. School Libraries Worldvide, 7(1), 28-45. Retrieved December 21, 2008, from Proquest Education Journals database. Baxendell, B.W. (2003). Consistent, Coherent, Creative The 3 C's of Graphic Organizers. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35, 46-53. Bellanca, J. (2007). A guide to graphic organizers: helping students organize and process content for deeper learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Convin Press. Biancarosa, G., & Snow, C. E. (2004). Reading Next-A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy: A report to the Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education. Boulineau, T., Fore, C., Hagan-Burke, S., & Burke, M. (2004). Use of Graphic Organizers To Increase the Story-Grammar Text Comprehension of Elementary Students with Learning Disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 27, 105-121. Brunn, M. (2002). The four-square strategy. The Reading Teacher, 55, 522-532. Burke, J. (2002). Tools for thought: Graphic organizers for your classroom. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann. Buzan, T. (2000). The Mind Map Book. CA: Penguin Press. Caine, R. N., & Crowell, S. (2004). MindShifts: A brain-based process for restructuring schools andrenewing education. Tucson, AZ: Zephyr. 175. Caviglioli, O., & Harris, I. (2003). Thinking visually: Step by step exercises that promote visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning. Markham, ON: Pembroke. Constantinidou, F. and Baker, S. (2002). Stimulus modality and verbal learning performance in normal aging. Brain and Language, 82(3), 296-311. Crawford, K. R., & Carnine, L. D. (2000). Comparing the effects of textbooks in eighthgrade U.S. History: Does conceptual organization help? Education & Treatment of children, 23(4), 387-423. Creswell, J. W. (2002). Education research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall. Curriculum Development Centre. (2004). Ministry of Education Malaysia. DiCecco, V. & Gleason, M. (2002). Using graphic organizers to attain relational knowledge from expository text. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 35(4),306-320. Duke, N.K., & Pearson, P.D. (2002). Effective Practices for developing reading Comprehension. In A. Farstrup & S. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 205-242). Newark, DE: international Reading Association. Dye, G. E. (2000). Graphic organizers to the rescue! Helping students link and remember-information. Teaching Exceptional Children, 32, 72-76. Eagen, M. (1999). Reflections on effective use of graphic organizers. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 42, 641-644. Fawson, P. (2000). But I only have a basal: Implementing guided reading in the early grades. Reading Teacher, 54 (1), 84-97. Founats, I. & Pinnell, G. (2006). Teaching for comprehending and fluency, K-8: thinking, talking and writing about reading. Portsmouth, NH: Heineman. Graham & Perin. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology. 99(3), 445-476. Griffin, C. C., Malone, L. D. & Kameenui, E .J (2001). Effects of graphic organizer instruction of fifth-grade students. Journal of Educational Research, 89(2), 98-107. Guerrero, A. M. (2003). Visualization and reading comprehension. Reports-Research, Classroom Research. Retrieved May 15, 2009 from EBSCO host database (ERIC Document Reproduction Series No. ED477161). Harkness, S. J. (2005). Student Assessment: Pre-Test/Post-Test and the Accumulation of Knowledge Across Sequential Prerequisites" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, Omni Shoreham, Washington Hilton, Washington, DC Online. Hendricks, C. (2009) Improving schools through action research. Upper Saddle River, N.J. Merrill. Howe, E. (2000). Integrating information technology into the curriculum: A short course for secondary students. Knowledge Quest, 26(2), 32-41. Retrieved February 23, 2009, from Proquest Education Journals database. Hyerle, D. (2004). Thinking maps as a transformational language for learning. In D. Hyerle (Ed.), Student successes with thinking maps: School-based research, results, and models for achievement using visual tools (pp. 1-16). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin. Hyerle, D. (2000). Thinking maps: Visual tools for activating habits of mind In A. L. Costa & B. Kallick (Eds.), Activating and engaging habits of mind (pp. 46-58). Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Institute for the Advancement of Research in Education. (2003). Graphic organizers: A review of scientifically based research. Charleston, WV: Institute for the Advancement of Research in Education. Katims, D., & Harmon, J. (2000). Strategic instruction in middle school social studies: Enhancing academic and literacy outcomes for at-risk students. Intervention in School and Clinic, 35(5), 280. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EJ606599) Retrieved April 2, 2009, from ERIC database. Kiefer, B. (2001). Understanding reading. School Library Journal, 47(2), 48-53. Retrieved November 27, 2008, from Academic Search Premier database. Kim, Ae-Hwa., Vaughn, S., Wanzek, J., & Wei, S. (2004). Graphic organizers and their effects on the reading comprehension of students with LD: a synthesis of research. Journal of Learning disabilities, 37(2), 105-108. Koechlin, C., & Zwaan, S. (2001). Info tasks for successful learning. Portland, ME: Pembroke. King, C. (2005). What were the major events in the civil rights movement? 33(2), 12-13. Retrieved November 27, 2008, from Academic Search Premier database. Lambert, M., & Carpenter, M. (2005). Visual learning: Using images to focus attention, evoke emotions, and enrich learning. Multimedia 62 Internet @ Schools, 12(5), 20-24. Retrived November 27,2008, from Academic Search Premier database. LaMere, R & Lanning, J., (2000). An important aspect of guided reading: Books galore! Classroom Connections, 2-5. Loertscher, D., Koechlin, C., & Zwaan, S. (2005). Ban those bird units: 15 models for teaching and learning in information-rich and technology-rich environments. Salt Lake City, UT: Hi Willow Research. Lewin, L. (2003). Paving the way in reading and writing: Strategies and activities to support struggling students in grades 6-12. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Massey, D., & Heafner, T. (2004). Promoting reading comprehension in social studies. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 48(1), 26. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. J 684265) Retrieved November 29, 2008, from ERIC database. Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., & Graetz, J. E. (2003). Reading comprehension instruction for secondary students: Challenges for struggling students and teachers. Learning Disability Quarterly, 26, 103-116. McCoy, J., & Ketterlin-Geller, R. (2004, November). Rethinking Instructional Delivery for Diverse Student Populations: Serving All Learners with Concept-Based Instruction. Intervention in School & Clinic, 40(2), 88-95. Retrieved February 15, 2009, from Academic Search Complete database. Merkley, D.M. & Jefferies, D. (2001) Guidelines for implementing a graphic organizer. The Reading Teacher, 54(4) 350-357. Mowat, N. (2004). Effective use of visual learning tools to improve student learning... and more! MultiMedia & Internet @ Schools, 11(2), 35-38. Retrieved April 5, 2009 from the Professional Development Collection database. Myers, M., & Savage, T. (2005). Enhancing student comprehension of social studies material. Social Studies, 96(1), 18-23. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EJ712162) Retrieved August 29,2009, from ERIC database. National Reading Panel. (2005). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups (NIH Publication No. 00-4754). Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Plotnick, E. (2001). A graphical system for understanding the relationship between concepts, 28(4), 42-45. Retrieved November 24, 2009, from Academic Search Premier database. Rankin, V. (1999). The thought that counts., 45(8), 26-30. Retrieved November 12, 2008, from Academic Search Premier database. Reiko, I. (2006). Graphic organizers and reading comprehension: Learners of Japanese as a second language: Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 54(4), 498-508. Robins, J. (2005). Beyond the bird unit, 33(2), 8-19. Retrieved October 27, 2008, from Academic Search Premier database. Rubman, Claire N.; Waters Salatas, H. (2000). A, B Seeing: The Role of Constructive Graphic Organizer in Children's Comprehension Monitoring. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 503-14. Silver-Palucuilla, H., & Fleischman, S. (2006). Technology to help struggling students. Educational Leadership, 63(5), 84-85. Retrieved March 27, 2009, from ERIC database. Simmons, D. C., Griffin, C. C., & Kameenui, E. J. (2001). Effects of teacher-constructed pre- and post-graphic organizer instruction on sixth grade science students' comprehension and recall. The Journal of Educational Research, 82(1), 15-21. Smith, C. (2003). Guided reading. Information Analyses, 2-5. Strong, R.W., Silver, H.F., Perini, M. J., & Tuculescu, G.M. (2002). Reading for academic success: powerful strategies for struggling, average, and advanced readers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc. Tate, M. L. (2003). Worksheets don't grow dendrites: instructional strategies that engage the brain. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc. Vaughn, S., & Edmonds, M. (2006). Reading comprehension for Older Readers. Intervention in School and Clinic, 41, 131-137. Willis, J. (2007). Brain-based teaching strategies for improving students' memory, learning, and test-taking success. Childhood Education. 83(5), 310-315. Zipke, M. (2008, October). Teaching Metalinguistic Awareness and Reading Comprehension With Riddles. The Reading Teacher, 62(2), 128-137. doi: 10.1598/RT.62.2.4