Hubungan kepimpinan instruksional pengetua dengan efikasi kendiri guru di sekolah menengah di daerah Saratok Sarawak

Hubungan kepimpinan instruksional pengetua dengan efikasi kendiri guru di sekolah menengah di daerah Saratok Sarawak

The purpose of this study was to identify the relationship between the principal's instructional leadership and the teachers' sense od efficacy. The samples comprised of 155 teachers; 67 male and 88 female, from three secondary school within Saratok District in Sarawak. These data were co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Talip, Anak Bijat
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
Published: 2010
Subjects:
LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/4810/1/s802778.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4810/7/s802778_abstract.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.4810
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
advisor Kasim, Abd. Latif
topic LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
spellingShingle LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
Talip, Anak Bijat
Hubungan kepimpinan instruksional pengetua dengan efikasi kendiri guru di sekolah menengah di daerah Saratok Sarawak
description The purpose of this study was to identify the relationship between the principal's instructional leadership and the teachers' sense od efficacy. The samples comprised of 155 teachers; 67 male and 88 female, from three secondary school within Saratok District in Sarawak. These data were converted into the Principal Instructional Management Rating Scale and Teacher's Sense of Efficacy Scale. The data were analyzed using the Statiscal Package For Social Science (SPSS) Version 15. Descriptive Analysis (mean, frequency and percentage) and Inferential Analysis (t-Test and Pearson Correlation) were used to describe the teachers' view. Results of this study revealed that the capability of the principals were at the medium range meanwhile the efficacy of the teachers were at the high level. Thus, teachers' perception towards the instructional leadership based on sexuality was not significantly different and there were differences in teachers' sense of efficacy. Furthermore, there was a positive relationship between the two cases mentioned above. From the result of this research, it was suggested that the education authorities might have to organize some courses on the instructional leadership to the principals to expose them on the importance of teaching observation and supporting teacher in the teaching and learning process, provide teachers with instructional practice, student involvement and classroom management, encourage the principals to practice the higher level of instructional leadership and to identify its dimension whether it was in the low or medium level of practicing
format Thesis
qualification_name masters
qualification_level Master's degree
author Talip, Anak Bijat
author_facet Talip, Anak Bijat
author_sort Talip, Anak Bijat
title Hubungan kepimpinan instruksional pengetua dengan efikasi kendiri guru di sekolah menengah di daerah Saratok Sarawak
title_short Hubungan kepimpinan instruksional pengetua dengan efikasi kendiri guru di sekolah menengah di daerah Saratok Sarawak
title_full Hubungan kepimpinan instruksional pengetua dengan efikasi kendiri guru di sekolah menengah di daerah Saratok Sarawak
title_fullStr Hubungan kepimpinan instruksional pengetua dengan efikasi kendiri guru di sekolah menengah di daerah Saratok Sarawak
title_full_unstemmed Hubungan kepimpinan instruksional pengetua dengan efikasi kendiri guru di sekolah menengah di daerah Saratok Sarawak
title_sort hubungan kepimpinan instruksional pengetua dengan efikasi kendiri guru di sekolah menengah di daerah saratok sarawak
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department College of Arts and Sciences (CAS)
publishDate 2010
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/4810/1/s802778.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4810/7/s802778_abstract.pdf
_version_ 1776103656968421376
spelling my-uum-etd.48102022-12-28T02:09:14Z Hubungan kepimpinan instruksional pengetua dengan efikasi kendiri guru di sekolah menengah di daerah Saratok Sarawak 2010 Talip, Anak Bijat Kasim, Abd. Latif College of Arts and Sciences (CAS) Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts and Sciences LB2801-3095 School administration and organization The purpose of this study was to identify the relationship between the principal's instructional leadership and the teachers' sense od efficacy. The samples comprised of 155 teachers; 67 male and 88 female, from three secondary school within Saratok District in Sarawak. These data were converted into the Principal Instructional Management Rating Scale and Teacher's Sense of Efficacy Scale. The data were analyzed using the Statiscal Package For Social Science (SPSS) Version 15. Descriptive Analysis (mean, frequency and percentage) and Inferential Analysis (t-Test and Pearson Correlation) were used to describe the teachers' view. Results of this study revealed that the capability of the principals were at the medium range meanwhile the efficacy of the teachers were at the high level. Thus, teachers' perception towards the instructional leadership based on sexuality was not significantly different and there were differences in teachers' sense of efficacy. Furthermore, there was a positive relationship between the two cases mentioned above. From the result of this research, it was suggested that the education authorities might have to organize some courses on the instructional leadership to the principals to expose them on the importance of teaching observation and supporting teacher in the teaching and learning process, provide teachers with instructional practice, student involvement and classroom management, encourage the principals to practice the higher level of instructional leadership and to identify its dimension whether it was in the low or medium level of practicing 2010 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/4810/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/4810/1/s802778.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/4810/7/s802778_abstract.pdf text eng public http://lintas.uum.edu.my:8080/elmu/index.jsp?module=webopac-l&action=fullDisplayRetriever.jsp&szMaterialNo=0000805955 masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Ahmad Tajuddin Abdul Hamid. (1989). The role of the principal as an instructional leader. Tesis M.Ed. yang tidak diterbitkan. Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Allinder, R. M. (1994). The relationship between efficacy and the instructional practices of special education teachers and consultants. Teacher Education and Special Education, 17, p. 86-95. Andi Audryanah Md. Noor. (2007). Kepemimpinan pengajaran dan efikasi kendiri pengetua sekolah menengah dan hubungannya dengan pencapaian akademik sekolah. Tesis Sajana Pendidikan: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Azlin Norhaini Mansor. (2004). Amalan pengurusan pengetua: Satu kajian kes. Kertas Kerja Dibentangkan Dalam Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pengurusan Dan Kepimpinan Pendidikan Ke-12, 6-9 Disember 2004. Genting Highlands: IAB. Avolio, B. J., & Howell, J. M. (1993). Transformational leadership, transactional leadership, locus of control and support for innovation: Key predictors of consolidated business unit performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, p. 891-902. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice Hall. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. New York: McGraw-Hill. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman. Bandura, A. (2001). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scale.s. (Monograph) Stanford, CA: Stanford University. Retrieved November 21 2002, from http://www.emory.edu/EDUCATION/mfp. Diperolehi pada 28.06.2009. Bandura, A. (undated). Teacher self-efficacy scale. Retrieved October 28 2001, from: http://www.coe.ohio-state.edu/ahoy/researc hinstruments.htm#Ban. Diperolehi pada 22.05.2009. Bass, B. M. (1990). Handbook of leadership. Theory, research and managerial application, Ed. Ke-3. New York: The Free Press. Betz, N. E. (2000). Self-efficacy as a basis for career assessment Journal of Career Assessment. 8(3): 205-219. Blase, J., & Blase, J. (1999). Principals' instructional leadership and teacher development: Teachers' perspectives. Educational administration quarterly, 35(3), 349-378. Bogler, R., & Somech, A. (2004). Influence of teacher empowerment on teachers' organizational commitment, professional commitment and organizational citizenship behavior in schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 277-289. Calabrese, R.L. (1991). Effective assistant principals: what do they do. NASSP Bulletin, 75(533), p. 51-7. Castle, J., Mitchell, C., & Gupta, V. (2002). Roles of elementary school principals in Ontario: Tasks and tensions. In H. Fennel (Ed.), The role of the principal in Canada. Calgary, AB: Detselig. Chemers, M. M., Watson, C. B., & May, S. T. (2000). Dispositional affect and leadership effectiveness: A comparison of self-esteem, optimism, and efficacy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulleting, 26, p. 267-277. Chua Yan Piaw. (2006) Kaedah dan statistik penyelidikan. (Buku 2). Asas statistik penyelidikan. McGraw-Hill (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. Cunningham, C. E., Woodward, C. A., Shannon, H. S., Macintosh, J., Lendrum, B., Rosenbloom, & D., Brown, J. (2002). Readiness for organizational change: A longitudinal study of workplace, psychological and behavioural correlates. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 75.(4), p. 377-392. Coladarci, T. (1992). Teachers' sense of efficacy and commitment to teaching. Journal of experimental education, 60, p. 323-337. De Bevoise, W. (1984), Synthesis of research on the principal as instructional leader. Educational Leadership, 41, p. 14-20. Ebmeier, H. (2003). How supervisions influences teacher efficacy and commitment: An investigation of a path model. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 18, p. 110-141. Enochs, L. G., & Riggs, I. M. (1990). Further development of an elementary science teaching efficacy belief instrument: A preservice elementary scale. School of Science and Mathematics. Findley, B., & Findley, D. (1992). Effective school: The role of principal. Contemporary Education 63(2): p. 102-104. Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Education Psychology. 76(4): p. 569-582. Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review 17(2), p. 183-211. Greenfield, W.D. (1987). Instructional leadership: Concepts, issues, and controversies, Allyn & Bacon, Boston, MA. Grimmett, P. P. (1996). The struggles of teacher research in a context of education reform: Implications for instructional supervision. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 12(1), p. 37-65. Guskey,T.R. (1984). The influence of change in instructional effectiveness upon the affective characteristics of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 21, p. 245-259. Guskey,T.R. (1988). Teacher efficacy, self concept, and attitudes toward the implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching and teacher education, 4(1), p. 63-69. Hallinger, P. (2003). Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3). Hallinger, P. (2005). Instructional leadership and the school principal: A Passing fancy that refuses to fade away. Leadership & Policy in Schools, 4.(3), p. 221-239. Hallinger, P. & Murphy, J. (1985). Assessing the instructional leadership behavior of principals. Elementary School Journal, 86(2), p. 206-218. Hannay, L. M., & Ross, J. A. t.1997). Initiating secondary school reform: The dynamic relationship between restructuring, reculturing, and retiming. Educational Administration Quarterly, 33 (Supplement), p. 576-603. Hussein Mahmood. (1993). Kepemimpinan dan keberkesanan sekolah. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Ismail Mustafa. (2008). Kepimpinan pendidikan: Teori dan amalan. Jitra : Pure Honey Enterprise. Jamaliah Abdul Hamid & Norashimah Ismail. (2005). Pengurusan & kepimpinan pendidikan. Teori, polisi dan pelaksanaan. Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia. Serdang : Ampang Press Sdn. Bhd. Jefri Hamid (2004). Kepimpinan pengajaran pengetua/guru besar dan kepuasan guru. Disertasi Sarjana Pendidikan: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Latip Muhammad (2007). Pelaksanaan Kepemimpinan Pengajaran di Kalangan Pengetua Sekolah. Seminar Penyelidikan Pendidikan Institut Perguruan Batu Lintang Tahun 2007. Krejcie, R.V., & Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining Sample saiz for research. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 3, p. 607-610. Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2000). Principal and teacher leadership effects: a replication. School Leadership & Management, 20(4), p. 415-434. Marsh, D. D. (2000). Educational leadership for the twenty-first century: Integrating three essential perspectives. In the Jossey-Bass reader on educational leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. McCormick, M. J. (2001). Self-efficacy and leadership effectiveness: Applying social cognitive theory to leadership. Journal of Leadership Studies, 8(1), p. 22-33. Mohd. Majid Konting (1998). Kaedah Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Mohd. Majid Konting (2000). Kaedah Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Mohd. Najib Abdul Ghafar (2001). Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Skudai. Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Mohd. Noor Jaafar. (2005). Kepimpinan pengajaran guru besar, komitmen dan kepuasan kerja guru: Satu kajian perbandingan dan hubungan antara sekolah berkesan dengan sekolah kurang berkesan. Available www.mpbl.edu.my/inter /penyelidikan/seminarpapers/2005/mdnorMPSAH.pd. Diperolehi pada 21.05.2009. Moore, W. P., & Esselman, M. E. (1994, April). Exploring the context of teacher efficacy: The role of achievement and climate. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. Mok Soon Sang. (1991). Asas pendidikan I. Kuala Lumpur: Kumpulan Budiman Sdn. Bhd. Munira Mohsin (2000). Persepsi guru terhadap amalan konsep kepimpinan pengajaran di kalangan pentadbir ke arah sekolah berkesan. Tesis Sarjana Pendidikan: Universiti Putra Malaysia. Newmann, F. M., King, M. B., & Rigdon, M. (1997). Accountability and school performance: Implications from restructuring schools. Harvard Educational Review, 67(1), p. 41-74. Nor Hashimah Hassan. (2000). Perkaitan antara gaya kepimpinan pengetua dengan tahap motivasi guru: Tinjauan di sekolah-Sekolah menengah daerah Segamat. Tesis Sarjana: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Norsilawati Yusof (1998). Keberkesanan kepimpinan pengajaran pengetua dalam mempengaruhi prestasi akudemik pelajar dari persepsi guru (satu kajian perbandingan). Tesis Sarjana. Skudai: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Paglis, L., & Green, S. G. (2002). Leadership self-efficacy and managers' motivation for leading change. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, p. 215-235. Pajares, F. (1997). Current directions in self-efficacy research. dlm. M. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Edu.). Advanceslin motivation and achievement. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. 10: p. 1-49. Peter Songan, & Rijeng Jishet (2000). Instructional leadership roler of secondary school in Sarawak. Jurnal Pendidikan Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Oktober 2000. 6: p. 22-34. Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (1966). Motivation in education; Theory research I and applications. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc. Ramaiah, A. L. (1999). Kepimpinan pendidikan: Cabaran masa kini Petaling Jaya: IBS Buku Sdn. Bhd. Reitzug, U.C., & Cross, B. (1993). Deconstructing principal instructional leadership: from "Super" vision to critical collaboration. Paper presented at the annual conferences of the University Council for Education Administration Huston, TX. Reitzug, U. C. (1997). Images of principal instructional leadership: From supervision to collaborative inquiry. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 12(4), p. 356-366. Rokhani Mangi. .(2003). Ucap utama persidangan kebangsaan pengetua-pengetua sekolah menengah malaysia cawangan Johor. Eden Garden Hotel Johor Bahru, 29 April 2003. p. 1-14. Ross, J.A., Cousins,J.B., & Gadalla T. (1996). Within-teacher predictors of teacher efficacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12, p. 385-400. Samsor Bin Sahdan. (2003). Kepimpinan pengajaran dan pelaksanaan inovasi kurikulum di sekolah menengah daerah Kota Setar Kedah. Kertas Projek Sarjana Sains (Pengurusan Pendidikan). Universiti Utara Malaysia. Sazali Yusoff, Zurida Ismail & Mustapa Kassim. (2004). Pengaruh efikasi kendiri guru besar terhadap sekolah berkesan. Jurnal Pengurusan dan Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 14(1), p. 34-44. Sergiovanni, T. J. (1992). Why we should seek substitutes for leadership. Educational Leadership, 49(5), ms. 41-45. Sergiovanni, T. J., & Starratt, R. J. (1998). Supervision: A redefinition (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. Shafari Mohamed Nor. (2001). Kajian amalan kepemimpinan pengajaran pengetua dari persepsi pengetua dun guru sekolah menengah di Kuala Pilah. Tesis Sarjana Sains: Universiti Putra Malaysia. Shahril Mazuki. (1997). Keberkesanan sekolah rendah di Malaysia. Kertas Kerja Konvensyen Pendidikan Nasional Ketiga. Institut Aminuddin Baki Genting Higlands, Pahang. Shahril Marzuki. (2000).Pendidikan di Malaysia: isu masa kini. Kertas kerja Seminar Pendidikan. Universiti Malaya, 15 April. Shahrom Sukari (1999). Persepsi Guru-guru Terhadap Kepimpinun Pengajaran Pengetua Sepatut dan Sebenar Di Sebuah Sekolah Menengah Daerah Kulai. Tesis Sarjana: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Sharifah Mohamad Nor & Azizah Abdul Rahim. (1998). Penyeliaan pengajaran sebagai satu ciri kepimpinan professional. Kertas kerja yang dibentangkan dalam Konvensyen pendidikan Nasional ke-6. Kula Lumpur. Southworth, G. (2002). Instructional leadership in Schools: reflections and empirical evidence. School Leadership & Management, 22(1). Sufa'at Tumin, Mohammad Mahadi, & Azman Adnan. (2001). Pengurusan sekolah oleh pengetua yang sentiasa sibuk. Jumal PKSM. 1-9. Tang Keow Ngang. (2000). Kepimpinan pengajaran pengetuu dan guru besar di sekolah-sekolah. Zon Ampang. Tesis Sarjana Sains. Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang. Teng Lung Kiu. (2006). Pengaruh faktor terpilih terhadap eJikasi-kendiri guru sekolah menengah di Sarawak. Tesis Ijazah Doktor Falsafh. UPM. Uma Sekaran (1992). Research methods for business: A skill building approach (2nd ed). New York: John Wiley. Wan Haslina Wan Zaharudin. (2003). EJikasi kendiri dun masalah di kalangan pelajar cacat penglihatan. Tesis Sarjana Pendidikan: Universiti Putra Malaysia. Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Academy of Management review. 14(3): p. 361-384. Woolfolk, A. (2001). Educational Psychology. Boston: Allyn and Bacon Yukl, G. (1994). Leadership in organizations. (3rd ed). NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.

Similar Items