Hubungan antara gaya pembelajaran dengan motivasi serta pencapaian akademik dalam kalangan pelajar sekolah menengah
The study examines relationship between students' learning style with motivation. A total of 240 students form 4 at secondary school in Kota Setar District involved in the study. The respondents comprised of 120 male and 120 female students. Descriptive statistics used in the study involved per...
Saved in:
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 格式: | Thesis |
| 語言: | eng eng |
| 出版: |
2011
|
| 主題: | |
| 在線閱讀: | https://etd.uum.edu.my/4813/1/s800437.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/4813/7/s800437_abstract.pdf |
| 標簽: |
添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
|
| id |
my-uum-etd.4813 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
uketd_dc |
| institution |
Universiti Utara Malaysia |
| collection |
UUM ETD |
| language |
eng eng |
| advisor |
Shaari, Abdull Sukor |
| topic |
LB Theory and practice of education |
| spellingShingle |
LB Theory and practice of education Azizan, Abd Wahab Hubungan antara gaya pembelajaran dengan motivasi serta pencapaian akademik dalam kalangan pelajar sekolah menengah |
| description |
The study examines relationship between students' learning style with motivation. A total of 240 students form 4 at secondary school in Kota Setar District involved in the study. The respondents comprised of 120 male and 120 female students. Descriptive statistics used in the study involved percentage, mean and standard deviation. Inference statistics involving pearson correlation analysis, was used to indicate variable relationship between student learning style and motivation. The study
employed a set of questionnaire measuring students' learning styles using four point likert scales and students' motivation using four point scales. The three categories of
learning styles by VAK model are visual, auditory and kinesthetic. The two aspects of
students7 motivation are intrinsic and extrinsic. The Cronbach alpha coefficient for' the instrument is 0.82. The result showed that the students' learning styles were mainly of auditory category, second was kinesthetic category and third was visual category. Results from the correlation test indicated positive but weak. There is a significant correlation between students' learning style with motivation. |
| format |
Thesis |
| qualification_name |
masters |
| qualification_level |
Master's degree |
| author |
Azizan, Abd Wahab |
| author_facet |
Azizan, Abd Wahab |
| author_sort |
Azizan, Abd Wahab |
| title |
Hubungan antara gaya pembelajaran dengan motivasi serta pencapaian akademik dalam kalangan pelajar sekolah menengah |
| title_short |
Hubungan antara gaya pembelajaran dengan motivasi serta pencapaian akademik dalam kalangan pelajar sekolah menengah |
| title_full |
Hubungan antara gaya pembelajaran dengan motivasi serta pencapaian akademik dalam kalangan pelajar sekolah menengah |
| title_fullStr |
Hubungan antara gaya pembelajaran dengan motivasi serta pencapaian akademik dalam kalangan pelajar sekolah menengah |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Hubungan antara gaya pembelajaran dengan motivasi serta pencapaian akademik dalam kalangan pelajar sekolah menengah |
| title_sort |
hubungan antara gaya pembelajaran dengan motivasi serta pencapaian akademik dalam kalangan pelajar sekolah menengah |
| granting_institution |
Universiti Utara Malaysia |
| granting_department |
College of Arts and Sciences (CAS) |
| publishDate |
2011 |
| url |
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4813/1/s800437.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/4813/7/s800437_abstract.pdf |
| _version_ |
1747827806818009088 |
| spelling |
my-uum-etd.48132022-04-12T23:44:44Z Hubungan antara gaya pembelajaran dengan motivasi serta pencapaian akademik dalam kalangan pelajar sekolah menengah 2011 Azizan, Abd Wahab Shaari, Abdull Sukor College of Arts and Sciences (CAS) College of Arts and Sciences LB Theory and practice of education The study examines relationship between students' learning style with motivation. A total of 240 students form 4 at secondary school in Kota Setar District involved in the study. The respondents comprised of 120 male and 120 female students. Descriptive statistics used in the study involved percentage, mean and standard deviation. Inference statistics involving pearson correlation analysis, was used to indicate variable relationship between student learning style and motivation. The study employed a set of questionnaire measuring students' learning styles using four point likert scales and students' motivation using four point scales. The three categories of learning styles by VAK model are visual, auditory and kinesthetic. The two aspects of students7 motivation are intrinsic and extrinsic. The Cronbach alpha coefficient for' the instrument is 0.82. The result showed that the students' learning styles were mainly of auditory category, second was kinesthetic category and third was visual category. Results from the correlation test indicated positive but weak. There is a significant correlation between students' learning style with motivation. 2011 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/4813/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/4813/1/s800437.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/4813/7/s800437_abstract.pdf text eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Abdul Razak Habib & Rashidi Azizan. (1997). Hubungan antara stail pembelajaran dengan pencapaian sains dan matematik sekolah menengah rendah. Jurnal Pendidikan 22: 39-49. Ahmad Saufie Haji Ali. (1996). Hubungan antara orientasi pembelajaran, motivasi pencapaian dan pendekatan pembelajaran serta kesannya terhadap pencapaian pelajar dalam mata pelajaran ekonomi tingkatan enam. Universtiti Kebangsaan Malaysia: Tesis. Amabile, T.M. (1987). The students work preference inventory: assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66. Atkinson, J. (1999). A theory of achievement motivation. New York: Wiley and Sons. Atkinson, J., & Raynor, 0. (2003). Motivational an achievement. Washington: Winston. Azizi Yahaya, Fawziah Yahya, Zurihanmi Zakariya & Noordin Yahaya (2005). Pembangunan kendiri. Skudai, Johor : Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Baharin Abu, Othman Md Johan, Syed Mohd Syed Mansor & Haliza Jafaar. (2007). Kepelbagaian gaya pembelajaran dan kemahiran belajar pelajar universiti di Fakulti Pendidikan, UTM Johor: Thesis. Jabatan Asas Pendidikan Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Barbe, W. B. (1987). Teaching through modality strengths: Concepts and Practices. Zaner-Bloser: Columbus, OH. Cafferty, E. (1980). An analysis of student performance based upon the degree of match between the educational cognitive style of the teachers and the educational cognitive style of the students. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Nebraska. Dissertation Abstract International, 41. Cano-Garcia, F., & Hughes, E. H. (2000). Learning and thinking styles: An analysis of their interrelationship and influence on language proficiency. Educational Psychology, 20(4), 413-430. Ciccarelli, S. K., & Mayer, G. E. (2006). Psychology. United States of America: Prentice-Hall. 336-345. Collinson, E. (2000). A survey of elementary students' learning style preferences and academic success. Contemporary Education. 71(4), 42-48. EBSCO HOST. AN.:4786969, ISSN: 0010-7476. Creswell, J. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications. Crow & Crow (1993). Psikologi pendidikan untuk guru. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Deci, E.L. (1991). Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum Publishing. Dictionary of Psychology (1973). New York: Dell Pub. Co. Doolan, L., & Honigsfeld, A. (2000). Illuminating the new standards with learning style: Striking a perfect match. Clearing House. 73(5), 274-278. EBSCO HOST. AN.: 3138206, ISSN: 0009-8655. Doljanac, R.F. (1994). Using motivational factors and learning strategies to predict academic success. Doctoral Dissertations, The University of Michigan. Dissertation Abstracts International 56, (01A): 0142. Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. (1978). Teaching students through their individual learning styles: A practical approach. Reston, Virginia: Reston Publishing. Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. (1999). The complete guide to the learning styles inservice system. United States of America: Allyn & Bacon. Dunn, R., & Stevenson, J.M. (1997). Teaching diverse college students to study a learning style prescription. College Students Journal. 31(3) 333-339. Entwistle, N. J. (1996). Styles of learning and teaching. An integrated outline of educational psychology for student-teachers and lecturers. Toronto: John Wiley and Sons. Gardner, H. (1993). Frames of mind. The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books. Gay, L. R. (1992). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application (4th ed.). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company. Grigerenko, E.L., & Sternberg, R. J. (1995). Thinking styles. In D. H. Saklofskz, & M. Zeidner. (Eds.). International Handbook of Personality and Intelligence, 205-230. New York: Plenum Press. Grinder, J., & Bandler, R. (1990). Style of learning and teaching. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Guestine, S.D., & Keim, M.C. (1996). The learning style of community college art students. Community College Review. 24(3). 17-25. Halonen, J.S., & Santrock, J.W. (1999). Psychology: Contexts and applications. 3rd ed. United States of America: McGraw-Hill. 328-333. Hamzah Nun. (1999). Gaya pembelajaran pelajar Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia: Tesis Master. Harter, S. (1990). The perceived competence scale for children. Child Development. 53, 87-97. Honey, P., & Mumford, A. (1992). The manual of learning style. 2nd ed. United Kingdom: Peter Honey. Joyce, B., & Weil, M. (1996). Models of teaching. 5th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Kazdin, A. E. (2003).Statistical analysis for single case experiments designs. In D. H. Barlow & M. Hersen (Eds.), Single case experimental designs (4th ed). New York: Pergamon. Khalid Mohamad Nor. (2002). Belajar teknik belajar di sekolah dan di universiti. Kuala Lumpur: PTS Publication and Distribution Sdn. Bhd. 2-5. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential 1earning: Eexperience as the source of learning and development. Eaglewood Cliffs. N. J: Prentice Hall. Kubiszyn, T., & Borich, G. (2000). Educational testing and measurement: Classroom application and practice. 6th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Leong, L.P., & Bettens, R.P.A. (2002). NUS students and Biggs' learning process questionnaire. CDTL Brief. 5(7) 3. Low Xin Xin. (2003). Pola gaya pembelajaran pelajar-pelajar di Kelas Lukisan Kejuruteraan Sekolah Menengah Sains Muar. Universiti Tehologi Malaysia: Laporan PSM. Ma'rof & Haslinda. (2002). Psikologi. Universiti Putra Malaysia: McGraw-Hill. 157-174. Mc Clelland, D.C. (1991). Human motivation. 2nd ed. Glenview, Illinois: Scotti Foresmen and Company. Mc Loughlin, C. (1999). The implications of the research literature on learning styles for the design of instructional material. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 15(3), 222-241. McKeachie, J.W. (2002). Learning styles can become learning strategies. NTLF Featured Article, 4(6). Retrieved May 09, 2003, from, http://www.ntlf.corn/html/pi/9511/v4n6.pdf. Mohd Majid Konting. (1998). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Neely, R. O., & Alm, D. (1992). Meeting individual needs: A learning styles success story clearing house. 66. Orsak, L. (1995). Learning style verrus the Rip Van Winkle syndrome. Educational Leadership. 48(2): 19-21. Pask, G. (1988). Learning strategies, teaching strategies, and conceptual or learning style. British Journal Educational Psychology. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books. Penin, J. (1990). The learning styles project for potential dropout. Educational Leadership. 48 (2): 23-24. Ramirez, A. (1986).Language learning strategies used by adolescents studying French in New York schools. Foreign Language Annals, 19, 131-141. Ramlah Jantan & Mahani Razali. (2002). Psikologi pendidikan-Pendekatan kontemporari. Kuala Lumpur: McGraw-Hill. Rayner, S., & Riding, R. (1997). Towards a categorization of cognitive styles and learning styles. Educational Psychology, 17(1-2), 5-27. Reid, J. M. (1984). The learning style preferences of ESL students. TESOL Quarterly, 21(1), 87-111. Reid, J. (1998). Understanding learning styles in the second language classroom. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Rosnah Mustaffa. (2007). Mengadaptasikan gaya pembelajaran pelajar ESL: Satu kajian kes pelajar tahun satu di UKM. Jurnal of Language Studies, 7. Roscoe, J. T. (1975). Fundamental research statistics for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Sarena Binti Abdul Karim (2003). Hubungan gaya pembelajaran dengan pencapaian akademik pelajar tingkatan empat di dua buah sekolah di Negeri Sembilan: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Schumacher, S., & McMillan, J. H. (1993). Research in education-A conceptual introduction. 3rd ed. New York: Harper Collins College Publishers. Sekaran, U. (2000). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Sharifah Alwiyah Alsagoff. (1986). Psikologi pendidikan II: Psikologi pembelajaran dan kognitif, bimbingan dan kaunseling. Kuala Lumpur: Heinemann Sdn. Bhd. 194-215. Slavin, R. E. (2006). Educational psychology: Theory and practice. 8th ed. United States of America: Pearson Education, Inc. Sternberg, R. J. (2001). Teaching psychology students that creativity is a decision. The General Psychologist, 36(1), 8-11. Sulaiman Masri. (2003). Kaedah Penyelidikan dan panduan penulisan (esei, proposal, tesis). Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publication & Distribution Sdn. Bhd. Suradi Salim. (1997). Tinjauan sikap dan tabiat belajar pelajar-pelajar sekolah menengah Negeri Selangor. Jurnal Pendidikan. 11: 77-90. Tobias, C. U. (1996). Adapting instruction to individual difference among students. American Psychology. Walberg, H. J. (1999). Improving the productivity of America's schools. Educational Leadership. 41, 19-27. Walter R. B., & Meredith D.G. (1983). Educational research; An introduction. 4th ed. New York: Longman. Watkins, R. (1996). An update on relating needs assessment and needs analysis. performance improvement, 35. Wittrock, M.C. (2004). Students' thought processes. New York: Macmillan. |