Keberkesanan strategi pentaksiran formatif terhadap pencapaian Geografi dan Matematik dalam kalangan pelajar tingkatan satu di daerah Tamparuli Sabah

Keberkesanan strategi pentaksiran formatif terhadap pencapaian Geografi dan Matematik dalam kalangan pelajar tingkatan satu di daerah Tamparuli Sabah

The purpose of this research is to show the effectiveness of formative assessment strategy towards the achievement in geography and mathematics among Form 1 students at SMK Tamparuli, Sabah. This research is also to ensure whether the formative assessment strategy can have an impact towards the s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ritarni, Tokan
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
Published: 2010
Subjects:
LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/4822/1/s802681.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4822/2/s802681_abstract.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.4822
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
advisor Shaari, Ahmad Jelani
topic LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
spellingShingle LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
Ritarni, Tokan
Keberkesanan strategi pentaksiran formatif terhadap pencapaian Geografi dan Matematik dalam kalangan pelajar tingkatan satu di daerah Tamparuli Sabah
description The purpose of this research is to show the effectiveness of formative assessment strategy towards the achievement in geography and mathematics among Form 1 students at SMK Tamparuli, Sabah. This research is also to ensure whether the formative assessment strategy can have an impact towards the students' active involvement in learning. The technique used in this research is a quasi-experiment that involves 84 respondents from two class of musical stream. The respondents are divided into two groups, the control group and the treatment group. The research was conducted for 5 weeks. Data is gathered through questionnaire, interviews as well as pre and post test. Data is analyzed through the use of the t-test. The research shows that there is a significant impact for geography where the difference in student's achievement score for pre and post test in the treatment group as well as between treatment and control group. However the result for mathematics was not significant which means there was no difference in student's achievement score for pre and post test in treatment as well as between treatment and control group. Overall, the majority of students and teachers exposed to the formative assessment strategy accept it in implementation of formative assessment in a positive manner. The implication of this research suggests that the use of formative assessment strategy in classroom is a wise choice in teaching and learning of geography and mathematics to increase student's achievement
format Thesis
qualification_name masters
qualification_level Master's degree
author Ritarni, Tokan
author_facet Ritarni, Tokan
author_sort Ritarni, Tokan
title Keberkesanan strategi pentaksiran formatif terhadap pencapaian Geografi dan Matematik dalam kalangan pelajar tingkatan satu di daerah Tamparuli Sabah
title_short Keberkesanan strategi pentaksiran formatif terhadap pencapaian Geografi dan Matematik dalam kalangan pelajar tingkatan satu di daerah Tamparuli Sabah
title_full Keberkesanan strategi pentaksiran formatif terhadap pencapaian Geografi dan Matematik dalam kalangan pelajar tingkatan satu di daerah Tamparuli Sabah
title_fullStr Keberkesanan strategi pentaksiran formatif terhadap pencapaian Geografi dan Matematik dalam kalangan pelajar tingkatan satu di daerah Tamparuli Sabah
title_full_unstemmed Keberkesanan strategi pentaksiran formatif terhadap pencapaian Geografi dan Matematik dalam kalangan pelajar tingkatan satu di daerah Tamparuli Sabah
title_sort keberkesanan strategi pentaksiran formatif terhadap pencapaian geografi dan matematik dalam kalangan pelajar tingkatan satu di daerah tamparuli sabah
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department College of Arts and Sciences (CAS)
publishDate 2010
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/4822/1/s802681.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4822/2/s802681_abstract.pdf
_version_ 1747827809063010304
spelling my-uum-etd.48222015-08-06T02:27:21Z Keberkesanan strategi pentaksiran formatif terhadap pencapaian Geografi dan Matematik dalam kalangan pelajar tingkatan satu di daerah Tamparuli Sabah 2010 Ritarni, Tokan Shaari, Ahmad Jelani College of Arts and Sciences (CAS) Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts and Sciences LB2801-3095 School administration and organization The purpose of this research is to show the effectiveness of formative assessment strategy towards the achievement in geography and mathematics among Form 1 students at SMK Tamparuli, Sabah. This research is also to ensure whether the formative assessment strategy can have an impact towards the students' active involvement in learning. The technique used in this research is a quasi-experiment that involves 84 respondents from two class of musical stream. The respondents are divided into two groups, the control group and the treatment group. The research was conducted for 5 weeks. Data is gathered through questionnaire, interviews as well as pre and post test. Data is analyzed through the use of the t-test. The research shows that there is a significant impact for geography where the difference in student's achievement score for pre and post test in the treatment group as well as between treatment and control group. However the result for mathematics was not significant which means there was no difference in student's achievement score for pre and post test in treatment as well as between treatment and control group. Overall, the majority of students and teachers exposed to the formative assessment strategy accept it in implementation of formative assessment in a positive manner. The implication of this research suggests that the use of formative assessment strategy in classroom is a wise choice in teaching and learning of geography and mathematics to increase student's achievement 2010 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/4822/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/4822/1/s802681.pdf text eng validuser https://etd.uum.edu.my/4822/2/s802681_abstract.pdf text eng public http://lintas.uum.edu.my:8080/elmu/index.jsp?module=webopac-l&action=fullDisplayRetriever.jsp&szMaterialNo=0000803847 masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Angelo, A. T., & Cross K. P (1993). Classroom Assessment Techniques. Classroom Assessment Techniques, A Handbook for College Teachers, 2nd Ed. Arter, J. (2009). Classroom Assessment For Student Learning (CASL) Perspective on the JCSEE Student Evaluation Standards. Retrieved from http://www.assessmentinst.com/ sites/default/files/JCSEE%2OStudent%20Eval%20 Practices%20Symp%20Paper%202009.pdf. Alias Ismail. (1993). Tanggapan terhadap penilaian formatif, pembinaan item penilaian dan penggunaannya oleh guru sains dan matematik. (Tesis sarjana, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia). Assessment Reform Group. (2002). Assessment For learning: 10 Principles.[PDF DOCUMENT]. Retrieved from http://www.assessment-reform-group.org/CIE3.PDF. Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2008) Transformasi Pendidikan Bermula 2010. Retrived from http://www.moe.gov.my/bpk/index.php?option =com_frontpage&Itemid= 1. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education, Vol5, No, 1, p 7-69. Box, C. (2008). Formative Assessment: Patterns, Personal Practice Assessment Theories, and Impact on Student Achievement and Motivation in Science. [PDF DOCUMENT] Retrieved from http://etd.lib.ttu.edu/ theses/available/etd-06302008-154934/unrestrict ed/Box_Mary_diss.pdf. Brookhart, S.M., & Long, B. (2008, November). Formative assessment that empowers. Educational Leadership, 66, 52-57. Retrieved from www.bayces.org/filemgmt/visit.php?lid=196. Bronwen, C. (2005). Pupils commentary on assessment for learning. Curriculum Journal, Vo1. 16, p 137-151. Retrieved from http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~content =a723651809~db=all~order=page. Fontana, D., & Fernandez, M. (1994). Improvements in mathematics performance as a consequence of self-assessment in Portuguese primary school pupils. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 64 (3): 407-417. Forbes, W. E. (2004). Improving the knowledge and use of formative assessment : A case study of a model of formative assessment in a K-3 science curriculum. Retrieved from Proquest Digital Dissertations. (MT 3267194). Furqon. (2007). Assessment of Learning for Continuous Quality Improvement in Education (The Case of Indonesia). International Journal of Education. VOl. 1(2), 125-130. Gates, A. A. (2008). Wyoming teacher's knowledge and use of formative assessment. Retrieved from Proquest Digital Dissertations. (AAT 330747). Gillson, R. (2009). Professional development in assessment for learning. Retrieved from Proquest Digital Dissertations. (AAT 3353674) Herman, J.L., Osmundson, E., Alaya, C., Schneider, S., & Timms, M.(2006). The Nature and Impact of Teachers 'Formative Assessment Practices. National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST), Paper prepared for the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Retrieved from the ERIC database. (ED495850). Heritage, M. (2007). Formative assessment: What do teachers need to know and do? Phi Delta Kappan, 89(2). Retrieved from http://www.pdkintl.org/kappan/k_v89/k0710her.htm How Does Formative Assessment Impact Student Performance? (A Look at a 7th Grade Mathematics Class). [PDF DOCUMENT] Retrieved from https://www.msu.edu/user/cernigl2/documents/ TE861C/actionResearchPlan.pdf. Huba, M. E., & Freed, J. E. (2000). Learner-centered assessment on college campuses/ Shifting the focus from teaching to learning. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Indiana University school of education, Bloomington. High School Survey of Student Engagement. [PDF DOCUMENT] Retrieved from http://ceep.indiana.edu /hssse/pdf/ncs_2.pdf. Ismail Alias. (1993). Tanggapan terhadap penilaian formatif, pembinaan item penilaian dan penggunaannya oleh guru sains dan matematik. (Tesis sarjana, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia). Jett, P.M. (2009). Teachers valuation and implementation of formative assessment strategies in elementary science classrooms. Retrieved from Proquest Digital Dissertations. (AAT 3370032). Jamil Adimin. (2006, September). Peperiksaan oh Peperiksaan: Sistem Pentaksiran Kebangsaan, Suatu Perspektif Baru. Pendidik, 10-13. King, D. M. (2003). The effects of formative assessment on students self-regulation, motivational belief and achievement in elementary science. Retrieved from Proquest Digital Dissertations. (AAT 3079342). Krton, A., Hallam, S., Peffers, J., Robertson, P., & Stobart, G. (2007) Revolution, evolution or Trojan Horse? Piloting Assessment for Learning in some Scottish primary schools. British Education Research Journal. Vol. 33. Issue 4, 605-627. Retrieved from the ERIC database. (EJ771188). Leahy, S., Lyon, C., Thompson, M., & William, D. (2005). Classroom Assessment: Minute by minute, Day by Day. Education Leadership, 63(3), 18-24. Retrieved from the ERIC database. (EJ745452). Lee, Icy. (2007). Feedback in Hong Kong Secondary Classrooms: Assessment for Learning or Assessment of Learning? Assessing Writing, 12(3), 180-198. Retrieved from the ERIC database. (EJ796617). McDonald, B., & Boud, D. (2003). The Impact of self-assessment on achievement: the effects of self-assessment training on performance in external examinations. Assessment in Education, 10(2), 209-220. McMahon, P. (2009). Increasing achievement through assessments: A study of the effects of administering ongoing formative assessments during a project-based unit of study. Retrieved from Proquest Digital Dissertation. (AAT 1452768). McManus, S.M. (2008). A study of formative assessment and high stakes testing: Issues of student efficacy and teacher views in the mathematics classroom. Retrieved from Proquest Digital Dissertation. (AAT 3306610). McMillan, J. H., & Hearn, J. (2008). Students self-Assessment: The key to stronger student motivation and higher achievement. Educational Horizon, 87, 40-49. Retrieved from the ERIC database. (EJ815370). Moore, W. P. (1994).The devaluation of standard testing; Applied Measurement in Education. 7(4), 343-367. Nash, B. (2009). Perception and use of a formative assessment system. Retrieved from Proquest Digital Dissertation (AAT 14504981). Nitko, A.J. (1994): Curriculum-Based Criterion-Based-Referenced Continuous Assessment: A Framework for the Concepts and Procedures of Using Continuous Assessment for Formative and Summative Evaluation of Students Learning. Paper presented at the International Meeting of the Association for the Study of Educational Evaluation (2nd, Pretoria, South Africa, July 1994). Retrieved from the ERIC database. (ED377199). Palomba, C. A., & Banta, T. W. (1999). Assessment essentials: Planning, implementing, and improving assessment in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Pelan Induk Pembangunan Pendidikan (2006-2010). Retrieved August, 12, 2009 from http://www.pensabah.gov.my/berita/pdfformat/%20 Pelan/%20Induk/%20Pendidikan/%202006-2010.pdf. Pentaksiran Berasaskan Sekolah Konsep PBS. Retrived from http://www.geocities.com/kheru2006 /pbs.htm. Perrenoud, P. (1991). Towards a pragmatic approach to formative evaluation, in: P. Weston (Ed.) Assessment of Pupils Achievement: Motivation and School b Success, pp. 79-101. (Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger). Rogers, T. D. (2008). An investigation of the effectiveness of Renaissance Learning formative assessments with third and fourth grade at-risk learners. Retrieved from Proquest Digital Dissertation. (AAT 3323772). Rolheiser, C., and J. A. Ross. (2001). "Student Self-Evaluation: What Research Says and What Practice Shows." Retrieved November 23, 2005, from http://www.cdl.org/resource-library/articl es/self_eval.php?type=subject&id=4>. Ross, A. J. (2006, November). The Reliability, Validity, and Utility of Self-Assessment. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation. V. 11(10). [PDF DOCUMENT]. Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/pdf/vl1nl0.pdf. Schunk, D. H. (1996). Attributions and the development of self-regulatory competence. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, April. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed. gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_ 01/0000019b/80/14/7e/43.pdf. Shute, J. V. (2008) Focus on Formative Feedback. Review of Educational Research. Vol. 78. No 1, pp. 513-189. Standard Kualiti Pendidikan Malaysia-Sekolah. Instrumen Pemastian Standard. SKPM 2. Edisi Disember 2003. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Stiggins, R. J. (1999a). Assessment Student Confidence and School Success. The National Teaching and Learning Forum. Classroom Assessment Techniques. Retrieved from http://www.ntlf.com/html/lib/bib/assess.htm. Stiggins, R. J. (2004). New Assessment Beliefs for a new school mission. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(1), 22-27. [PDF DOCUMENT]. Retrieved from http://www.michigan.gov/documents/mde/Stiggins_ ArticleNewBeliefs_189511_7.pdf. Suhaidah Abduk Kadir (2002). Perbandingan Pembelajaran Koperatif dan Tradisional Terhadap Prestasi, Atribusi Pencapaian, Konsep Kendiri Akademik dan Hubungan Sosial Dalam Pendidikan Perakaunan. [PDF DOCUMENT]. Retrieved from http://www.educ.upm.edu.my/~suhaida/tesis.pdf. Tierney, R. D., & Charland, J. (2007, April). Stocks and prospects: Research on formative assessment in secondary classrooms. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. Retrieved from the ERIC database. (ED496236). University of Tennessee (Chattanooga). Student Assessment Techniques. Retrieved Mac, 23, from http://www.utc.edu/Administration/WalkerTeaching ResourceCenter/FacultyDevelopment/Assessment/ assessment.html#prior?%20knowledge. Van, E., & William, C. (2004). Achievement and motivation in the middle school science classroom. The effect of formative assessment feedback. Retrieved from Proquest Digital Dissertations. (AAT31100082).. Waller, S. G. (2007). The impact of formative assessment data to improve classroom instruction and 3rd grade achievement in mathematics, reading and language arts utilizing the Renaissance Learning Assessment system. Retrieved from Proquest Digital Dissertation. (AAT 3284843). Whiting, B., Van Burg, J.W., & Render, G.F. (1995). Mastery Learning in the classroom. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the AERA san Francisco 1995. Retrieved from the ERIC database. (ED382688). Wren, D.G. (2008). Using formative assessment to increase learning. [PDF DOCUMENT] Retrieved from http://www.vbschools. com/accountability/ResearchBriefFormAssmtFinal. pdf.

Similar Items