Tahap amalan pengurusan kurikulum sekolah rendah di Daerah Penampang Sabah : Satu kajian kes

Tahap amalan pengurusan kurikulum sekolah rendah di Daerah Penampang Sabah : Satu kajian kes

This research is a case study on curriculum management on 3 schools that was carried out in Penampang. A total of 46 currriculum managers (at school level) were involved in the evalution of curriculum management in the schools where the research had been carried out. The aim of this research is to c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Daynel, Petros
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
Published: 2010
Subjects:
LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/4823/1/s802625.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4823/2/s802625_abstract.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.4823
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
advisor Kassim, Mustapa
topic LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
spellingShingle LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
Daynel, Petros
Tahap amalan pengurusan kurikulum sekolah rendah di Daerah Penampang Sabah : Satu kajian kes
description This research is a case study on curriculum management on 3 schools that was carried out in Penampang. A total of 46 currriculum managers (at school level) were involved in the evalution of curriculum management in the schools where the research had been carried out. The aim of this research is to check the implementation of the curriculum management in schools, to analyse the strength and weakness that occur in the curriculum management of school involved, to analyse and to see the correlation between curriculum management and academic performance of the school involved particularly in the UPSR Four hypothesis were formulated. The findings of this research are: there is a significant correlation between high level of curriculum management with high result in UPSR and moderate curriculum management with moderate UPSR result but there is no correlation between moderate level of curriculum management and poor result in UPSR. Among the weakness which occured in the curriculum management of those schools involved are: there are gaps of opinion between those who construct the curriculum and the implementer. There are weaknesses in dilivering the curriculum. A large class size hinders the implementation of the curriculum effectively, the restricted numbers of teachers, teachers with unsuitable options of teaching, the inproficiency of languages among students, and finally the behind schedule implementation of the computer laboratory facilities are the factors of weaknesses in curriculum management
format Thesis
qualification_name masters
qualification_level Master's degree
author Daynel, Petros
author_facet Daynel, Petros
author_sort Daynel, Petros
title Tahap amalan pengurusan kurikulum sekolah rendah di Daerah Penampang Sabah : Satu kajian kes
title_short Tahap amalan pengurusan kurikulum sekolah rendah di Daerah Penampang Sabah : Satu kajian kes
title_full Tahap amalan pengurusan kurikulum sekolah rendah di Daerah Penampang Sabah : Satu kajian kes
title_fullStr Tahap amalan pengurusan kurikulum sekolah rendah di Daerah Penampang Sabah : Satu kajian kes
title_full_unstemmed Tahap amalan pengurusan kurikulum sekolah rendah di Daerah Penampang Sabah : Satu kajian kes
title_sort tahap amalan pengurusan kurikulum sekolah rendah di daerah penampang sabah : satu kajian kes
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department College of Arts and Sciences (CAS)
publishDate 2010
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/4823/1/s802625.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4823/2/s802625_abstract.pdf
_version_ 1747827809322008576
spelling my-uum-etd.48232015-08-06T02:29:33Z Tahap amalan pengurusan kurikulum sekolah rendah di Daerah Penampang Sabah : Satu kajian kes 2010 Daynel, Petros Kassim, Mustapa College of Arts and Sciences (CAS) Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts and Sciences LB2801-3095 School administration and organization This research is a case study on curriculum management on 3 schools that was carried out in Penampang. A total of 46 currriculum managers (at school level) were involved in the evalution of curriculum management in the schools where the research had been carried out. The aim of this research is to check the implementation of the curriculum management in schools, to analyse the strength and weakness that occur in the curriculum management of school involved, to analyse and to see the correlation between curriculum management and academic performance of the school involved particularly in the UPSR Four hypothesis were formulated. The findings of this research are: there is a significant correlation between high level of curriculum management with high result in UPSR and moderate curriculum management with moderate UPSR result but there is no correlation between moderate level of curriculum management and poor result in UPSR. Among the weakness which occured in the curriculum management of those schools involved are: there are gaps of opinion between those who construct the curriculum and the implementer. There are weaknesses in dilivering the curriculum. A large class size hinders the implementation of the curriculum effectively, the restricted numbers of teachers, teachers with unsuitable options of teaching, the inproficiency of languages among students, and finally the behind schedule implementation of the computer laboratory facilities are the factors of weaknesses in curriculum management 2010 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/4823/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/4823/1/s802625.pdf text eng validuser https://etd.uum.edu.my/4823/2/s802625_abstract.pdf text eng public http://lintas.uum.edu.my:8080/elmu/index.jsp?module=webopac-l&action=fullDisplayRetriever.jsp&szMaterialNo=0000802766 masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Avolio, B. J., Waldman, D.A & Einstein, W.O. (1988). Transformational leadership In a management game simu1ation:impacting the bottom line. Group & Organization Studies 13(1): 59-80. Avolio, B. J., Waldman, D.A. & Yammarino, F.J. (1991). Leading in the 1990s: The four I'sof transformational leadership. Journal of European Industrial Training 15(4): 9-16. Azmi Zakaria, Wan Fatimah & Quek Bong Cheang. (1995). "Indikator Kepimpinan cemerlang: Satu analisis pengurusan Pendidikan". Jurnal Pengurusan Pendidikan. Pahang: Institut Aminudin Baki. hlm.. 14-30. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectation. New York: The Free Press. Bass, B. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning To share vision. Organizasional Dynamics 18(3) 19-31. Bass, B. M & Avolio, B.J (1997). Full range leadership development, manual for Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Polo Alto. California: Mind Garden, Inc. Baker, T. L. (1994). Doing Social Research. 2nd Edition. New York; McGraw-Hill Berita Harian online (2009). Retrieved April 2009 from (http://www.geocities.com/pendidikanmy/berita/fokus81.html?200910). Berita Harian online (2009). Retrieved April 2009 from (http://members.tripod.com/~sarjana/vokasional1. html). Bossert, S.T, Dwyer, D.C., Rowan, B & Lee, G.V. (1982). The instructional managemnet role. Brain, G.B. (1966). Increasing your administrative skills in dealing with the instructional programme, successful school management series. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper Colophon Books. Caldwell, B. (1996). Redesigning Schooling for information age: The role of Networking, Keynote address to a conference in the theme. Electronic Networking and Australia's School conducted in sydney bya ITEC, April 12. Conger J. A . 1992. Learning to lead: the art of transforming managers into Leaders. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. Conger, J. .A. & Kanungo, R.N. (1992).Perceived behavioral attributes of charismatic Leadership. Canadian Journal of Behavioral science 24(1): 66-102. De Bovoise, W. 1984. Synthesis of research on principal as instructional leader. Educational leadership 41(5): 14-21. Edmonds, R. (1979). Effective school for the urban poor. Educational leadership 37(1): 15-23. Greenfield, W. (1987). Preface. Dlm. Greenfield, W. (pnyt.), Instructional Leadership Concepts, issues and controversies. hlm.xi-xiii. Boston: Allyn and Bacon,Inc. Greenfield, W.D. Jr. (1995). Towards a theory of school administration, the centrality by leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly. 31(1): 81-85. Hallinger, P, & Murphy, J. (1985). Assesing the instructional management behaviour of principles. The Elementary School Journal. 86(2): 217-247. Hamilton, S. F. (1993). Synthesis of Research on the social side of Schooling. Educational Leadership. 40/5. (Februari): 65-72. Haminah Suhaibo. (1997). Persepsi terhadap kompetensi guru besar sebagai pemimpin pengajaran. Tesis M.Sc. Sarawak: Universiti Malaysia Sarawak. Holland, A., & Andre, T. (1994). Relationship of self-esteem to selected personal and environment of adolescents, Adolencence 29/114. (Summer): 345-360 Howley, C. B. (1995). The Matthew principle: a West Virginia replication? Education policy analysis achieves. (November, 15): 1-25. Electronic Journal, http://seamonkey. ed.asu.edu/epaa/v13n8, html. Hussein Mahmood. (1993). Kepimpinan dan keberkesanan sekdah. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dm Pustaka. Ishak Sin. (2001). Pengaruh kepimpinan pengajaran, kepimpinan transformasi kesannya kepada kepimpinan ke atas komitmen terhadap organisasi, efikasi dan kepuasan kerja guru. Tesis Dr. Fal. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi. Ismail Mustafa, (2008). Kepimpinan Pendidikan Teori Dan Amalan. Pure Honey Enterprise 90, Jalan Mawar 2, Jitra Kedah. Juhana Zailah (2007). Hubung kait kesibukan pengetua dengan tahap kepimpinan pengajaran yang diamalkan di Sek Men di Zon Bandar Muar. Tesis Sarjana Pendidikan: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Khairul Zaman (2004). Pengurusan Kurikulum di Sekolah Menengah Petaling Jaya. Tesis Sarjana. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2009). Retrieved April 209 from http://www.emoe.gov.my/. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2001). Penyata dasar standard tinggi kualiti pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Jemaah Nazir Sekolah. Kamarudin Haji Husin. (1990). Pengajaran dan pembelajaran lisan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (1992). Buku penerangan KBSM. Kuala Lumpur : Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (1992). Buku penerangan KBSM. Kuala Lumpur: Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2001). Instrumen pemeriksaan peningkatan standard tinggi kualiti pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Jemaah Nazir Malaysia. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (1998). Perangkaan Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia, 1998. Kuala Lumpur : Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2001). Falsafah pendidikan kebangsaan, matlamat dan Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2001). Kepimpinan dun pengurusun kurikulum. Kuala Lumpur: Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2001). Belajar cara belajar. Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2001). Pembelajaran secara kontekstual. Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2001). Aplikasi teori kecerdasan pelbagai dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran. Kuala Lumpur:Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2001). Pembelajaran Masteri. Kuala Lumpur: Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2001). Pembelajaran secara konstruktivisme. Kuala Lumpur: Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum. Kementerian Pendidi kan Malaysia. (2001). Pengajaran berasaskan kajian masa depan. Kuala Lumpur: Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia, (2001). Kemahiran berfikir dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran . Kuala Lumpur: Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2001). Pembelajaran asas kendiri. Kuala Lumpur: Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum. Kementerian Pendidi kan Malaysia. (2001). Penilaian kendalian sekolah. Kuala Lumpur: Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum. Kershaw, C. A. & Blank, M.A. (1993). Student and educator perception an alternative school structure. Kertas kerja dibentangkan pada Mesyuarat Tahunan American Educational Research Association. Atlanta GA, April. Kerr, S. 1977. Subtitutes for leadership: some implications for organizational design. Organizational and Administration Science 8: 135-146. Kerr, S. & Jemier, J.M. (1978). Subtitutes for leadership: their meaning and Measurement Organizational Behaviour and Human Performance 22 : 375-403. Krug, S . E. (1992). Instructional leadership: A constructivist perspective Educational Administrative Quarterly 28(3) 430-443. Leithwood, K., Paul T.B. & Bradley J. C. (1992). Developing expert leadership for future schools. London: The Falmer Press. Longstreet, W. S & Shane, H. G. (1993). Curriculum for a new millenium. Boston: Allyn And Bacon. Marsh, C. J. (1997). Planning, management & ideology, key concepts for understanding curriculum. London. Falmer Press. Mok Soon Sang (2003). llmu Pendidikan Untuk KPLI. Kumpulan Budiman Sdn Bhd. Subang Jaya. Mohd. Daud Hamzah. (1993). Penerokaan teori kurikulum. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Mohd. Majid Konting. (1993). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan.Kuala Lumpur : Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Ornstein & Hunkins, F. P. (1998).Cuwiculum foundation, principles and issues. Ed. ke-3. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Peterson, K. D. 1987. Administrative control and instructional leadership. Dlm. Greenfreld, W. (pnyt.), Instructional leadership concepts, issues and controversies. hlm.xi-xiii. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S.B & Bommer, W.H. (1996). Meta-analysis of the relationship between Kerr and Jermier's subtitutes for leadership and employee job attitudes, role perceptions, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 59(5) 503-609. Pollard, A. & Tann, S. (1987). Reflective teaching in primary school. London: Cassell. Purkey , S. C & Smith, M.S. (1983). Effective school: conversation with John Goodlad, Educational Leadership 42(6): 16-19. Robbins, S. A. (1 998). Organizational behaviour: concepts; contraversies and application. Ed. Ke-8. Eaglewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall. Weber, G. (1971). Inner-city children can be taught to read: four succesful schools. Washington D.C.: Council for basic education. Richard L. Daft, (2005) Organization theory and design, International Student Edition, Thomson / South Western. Retrieved April 2009 from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Henry_Fayol. Robbins. (1998). Organisational behaviour: concepts,contraversies,and application Ed. ke-8. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall. Robertson, P. (1990). Reinventing the High School. The coalition campus school project in New York city. Kertas kerja dibentangkan pada Mesyuarat Tahunan American Educational Research Association. Atlanta GA, 6-7 April. Scribd Online (2009). Pelan Induk Pembangunan Negara. Retrieved April 2009 from (http://www.scribd.com /doc/6409385/Ringkasan-Pelan-Induk-Pembangunan- Pendidikan). Smyth,C. J. (1994). A society critical viewof the managing school. London: Palmer Press. Spinks, J. M. (1990). Collaborative decision -making at the school managemnet. Dlm. Chapman, J. pnyt.). School- based decision making and management. hlm. 4-5. Busingstoke: Falmer Press. Stockard, J, & Mayberry, M. (1992). Resources and classroom size. Effective educational environments. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press. Inc. 40-58. Turney, C, Hatton N., Laws S. K, & Smith K.S. (1992). Educational management role dan tasks, the school manager. Sydney: Allen & Unwin. Ubben G. C. & L. W. Hughes. (1992). The principal: creative leadership for effective schools. Sydney: Allyn and Bacon. Wallace, M. (1990). Curriculum management and organisation. The collegite approach Dlm. South, G & Lofthouse (pnyt.). The study of primary education. source book. 3(4)11-13. London: Palmer Press. Walberg, H. J. (1992). On local control: is bigger better? Source book on school and district size, cost, and quality. Minneapolis, MN. Minesota university, Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs Oak Brook, North central Regional Educational Laboratory. 118-134. Zigarelli, M. A. (1996). An empirical test of conclusions from effective schools research. Education Research, 90(2), 103-109. Zulwali Kipli Merawi. (1996). Examination of staff development provision and practice in secondary schools in Sarawak Dissertasi Dr. Fal. University of Manchester.

Similar Items