Korelasi dan pengaruh kualiti pengajaran guru mata pelajaran Bahasa Malaysia terhadap pencapaian dan minat pelajar di tingkatan peralihan

Korelasi dan pengaruh kualiti pengajaran guru mata pelajaran Bahasa Malaysia terhadap pencapaian dan minat pelajar di tingkatan peralihan

The objective of the study is to identify the relationship between quality of instruction of the Bahasa Malaysia teacher and the student's interest and achievement in Bahasa Malaysia. The respondents were chosen from a secondary school in Butterworth, Penang. The aspects studied include lesson...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lim, Chai Wan
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
Published: 2009
Subjects:
LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/4825/1/s89410.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4825/2/s89410_abstract.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.4825
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
advisor Don, Yahya
topic LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
spellingShingle LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
Lim, Chai Wan
Korelasi dan pengaruh kualiti pengajaran guru mata pelajaran Bahasa Malaysia terhadap pencapaian dan minat pelajar di tingkatan peralihan
description The objective of the study is to identify the relationship between quality of instruction of the Bahasa Malaysia teacher and the student's interest and achievement in Bahasa Malaysia. The respondents were chosen from a secondary school in Butterworth, Penang. The aspects studied include lesson planning, content coverage, and teacher's enthusiasm, the use of various teaching aids, assessment and feedback. The instruments used in this research were adopted from the model of Slavin, that is, 14 categories of quality instruction applied in the classroom. Questionnaires were administered to 155 Remove Classes (year 2009) students. The instrument consists of 62 items categorized into five scales. Three hypotheses were formulated and tested by using both the Pearson product moment correlation and t-test. The result showed that quality of instruction was at a less than satisfactory level. The result showed that there were significant and positive correlations between quality of instruction and the student's interest. The teacher's quality of instruction in lesson planning, content coverage, teacher's enthusiasm, assessment and feedback all showed significant and positive correlations with student's achievement in Bahasa Malaysia. However the result showed that there were no significant correlations between the use of various teaching aids and the student's achievement. The t-test did not indicate any significant difference between the quality of instruction of the Bahasa Malaysia teacher and gender. In short, the students' interest and achievement in the subject depends very much on the application of quality instruction and enthusiasm of the subject teachers
format Thesis
qualification_name masters
qualification_level Master's degree
author Lim, Chai Wan
author_facet Lim, Chai Wan
author_sort Lim, Chai Wan
title Korelasi dan pengaruh kualiti pengajaran guru mata pelajaran Bahasa Malaysia terhadap pencapaian dan minat pelajar di tingkatan peralihan
title_short Korelasi dan pengaruh kualiti pengajaran guru mata pelajaran Bahasa Malaysia terhadap pencapaian dan minat pelajar di tingkatan peralihan
title_full Korelasi dan pengaruh kualiti pengajaran guru mata pelajaran Bahasa Malaysia terhadap pencapaian dan minat pelajar di tingkatan peralihan
title_fullStr Korelasi dan pengaruh kualiti pengajaran guru mata pelajaran Bahasa Malaysia terhadap pencapaian dan minat pelajar di tingkatan peralihan
title_full_unstemmed Korelasi dan pengaruh kualiti pengajaran guru mata pelajaran Bahasa Malaysia terhadap pencapaian dan minat pelajar di tingkatan peralihan
title_sort korelasi dan pengaruh kualiti pengajaran guru mata pelajaran bahasa malaysia terhadap pencapaian dan minat pelajar di tingkatan peralihan
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department College of Arts and Sciences (CAS)
publishDate 2009
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/4825/1/s89410.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4825/2/s89410_abstract.pdf
_version_ 1747827809819033600
spelling my-uum-etd.48252015-08-06T02:31:40Z Korelasi dan pengaruh kualiti pengajaran guru mata pelajaran Bahasa Malaysia terhadap pencapaian dan minat pelajar di tingkatan peralihan 2009 Lim, Chai Wan Don, Yahya College of Arts and Sciences (CAS) Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts and Sciences LB2801-3095 School administration and organization The objective of the study is to identify the relationship between quality of instruction of the Bahasa Malaysia teacher and the student's interest and achievement in Bahasa Malaysia. The respondents were chosen from a secondary school in Butterworth, Penang. The aspects studied include lesson planning, content coverage, and teacher's enthusiasm, the use of various teaching aids, assessment and feedback. The instruments used in this research were adopted from the model of Slavin, that is, 14 categories of quality instruction applied in the classroom. Questionnaires were administered to 155 Remove Classes (year 2009) students. The instrument consists of 62 items categorized into five scales. Three hypotheses were formulated and tested by using both the Pearson product moment correlation and t-test. The result showed that quality of instruction was at a less than satisfactory level. The result showed that there were significant and positive correlations between quality of instruction and the student's interest. The teacher's quality of instruction in lesson planning, content coverage, teacher's enthusiasm, assessment and feedback all showed significant and positive correlations with student's achievement in Bahasa Malaysia. However the result showed that there were no significant correlations between the use of various teaching aids and the student's achievement. The t-test did not indicate any significant difference between the quality of instruction of the Bahasa Malaysia teacher and gender. In short, the students' interest and achievement in the subject depends very much on the application of quality instruction and enthusiasm of the subject teachers 2009 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/4825/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/4825/1/s89410.pdf text eng validuser https://etd.uum.edu.my/4825/2/s89410_abstract.pdf text eng public http://lintas.uum.edu.my:8080/elmu/index.jsp?module=webopac-l&action=fullDisplayRetriever.jsp&szMaterialNo=0000802936 masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Abd. Rahim Abd. Rashid. (1999). Profesionalisme motivasi pengurusan bilik darjah. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications & Distributors Sdn. Bhd. Abdul Rahman Aziz. (1997). Motivasi dan pembangunan diri. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan. Publications & Distributors Sdn. Bhd. Ary, D., Jacobs, L.C., Razavieh, A. (2002). Introduction to research in education (6th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehact Winston. Ainley, M. (2006). Connecting with learning: Motivation, affect and cognition in interest processes. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 391-405. Ainon Mohd. & Abdullah Hassan. (2009). Guru Sebagai Pendorong Dalam Darjah. Pelita Bahasa Jun 2009. PTS Consultants Sdn Bhd 2002. Ambigapathy Pandian. (2003). Bahasa dan literasi: penyelidikan dan peninjauan untuk pendidikan. Universiti Putra Malaysia. Asmah Hj. Omar. (1987). Malay in its sociocultural context. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Awing Sariyan. (1994). Isu-isu Bahasa Malaysia. Petaling Jaya: Penerbit Fajar Bakti. Baker, C. (1992). Attitude and Language. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd. Baker, J. (2000). Sophisticated technology offers higher education options. The Journal of Technology horizons in Education, 28(4), 58. Bloom, S. B. (1976). Human characteristic and school learning. New York: McGraw-Hill. Brown, H.D. (1980). Principles of foreign language learning and teachinh; Englewood Cliffs, N: Prentice Hall. Carroll, J.B. (1963). A model of school learning. Teachers College Record.64, 723- 733. Corbin, S.S., & Chiachiere, F.J.(1997). Attitudes toward achievement in foreign language study. Education Research Quarterly, 21.1, 3-12. Crow, L.D., Cow, A. (1980). Psikologi pendidikan untuk perguruan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Durik, A. M., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2007). Different strokes for different folks: How individual interest moderates the effects of situational factors on task interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 597-610. Elias, H. & Yaakub, N.F. (2002). Psikologi personaliti. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Evans, E. M., Schweingruber, H., & Stevenson, H. W. (2002). Gender differences in interest and knowledge acquisition: The United States, Taiwan, and Japan. Sex Roles, 47, 153-167. Halimah Harun. (2006). Minat, motivasi dan kemahiran mengajar guru pelatih. Jurnal Pendidikan 31, 83-96. Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., Carter, S. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2000). Short-term and long -term consequences of achievement goals: Predicting interest and performance over time. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 316-330. Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., Durik, A. M., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2008). The role of achievement goals in the development of interest: Reciprocal between achievement goals, interest, and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 105-122. Harp, S. F., & Mayer, R. E. (1997). The role of interest in leraning from scientific text and illustrations: On the distinction between emotional interest and cognitive interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 92-102. Hoffmann, L.(2002). Promoting girls' interest and achievement in physics classes for beginners. Learning and instruction, 12,447-465. Jo-Anne, L.M.B. (2002). Teacher instruction, student attitudes, and mathematics performance among 10th and 12th grade Black and Hispanic students. Journal of Negro Education, 70, 19-37. Kagan, D.M. (1992). Implications of research on teachers belief. Educational Psychologist, 27, 65-90. Kamus Dewan. (2005). (Edisi Kelima). Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Kassim, K. (1997). Psikiatri kanak-kanak. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Katz, I., Assor, A., Kanat-Mamon, Y., & Bereby-Meyer, Y. (2006). Interest as a motivational resource: Feedback and gender matter, but interest makes the difference. Social Psychology of Education, 9, 27-42. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2003). Huraian Sukatan Pelajaran Kurikulum Bersepadu Sekolah Menengah Kelas Peralihan Bahasa Melayu (2003). Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2000). Kajian Pelaksanaan Bahasa Melayu di Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan Cina dan Tamil. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2000). Pengumuman Keputusan Peperiksaan PMR 2000. [On-line]. Available: http://ww2.moe.gov.my/m/p/pmr-kptsan 2000.htm. Koh Boh Boon. (1988). Pengajaran Bahasa Malaysia di kelas peralihan. Jurnal Dewan Bahasa Jilid 32(3), 180-186. Kozma, R.B. (1991). Learning with media. Review of Educationa1 Research. 61(2), 179-211. Lau Chooi Hwa. (2005). Hubungan antara kualiti guru sejarah dengan pencapaian dan minat murid terhadap sejarah. Tesis Master Universiti Sains Malaysia yang tidak diterbitkan. Pulau Pinang: Universiti Sains Malaysia. Lawrence, J. Z., Peter, Y. G, & Guangwei, H. (2008). A cognitive perspective on Singaporean primary school pupil's use of reading strategies in learning to read in English. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 245-271. Lee Kim Hong. (2004). Pengajaran dan pembelajaran sastera dalam sukatan pelajaran pengajian. Cina KDPM. Maktab Perguruan Raja Melewar, Seremban. Litman, J,A., & Silvia, P.J. (2005). The latent structure of trait curiosity: Evidence for interest and deprivation curiosity dimensions. Journal of Personality Assessment, 86(3), 318-328. Mahathir Mohammed. (1991). Malaysia: The way forward. Kuala Lumpur: Malaysia Business Council. Malaysia. (1996). Akta Pendidikan 1996 (Akta 550). Mayer, R. E. & Gallini, J.K. (1990). When is an illustration worth ten thousand words? Journal of Educational Research, 82(4), 715-726. Mohamad Safial Gafar. (1999). Sikap dan motivasi pelajar-pelajar Cina terhadap pembelajaran Bahasa Melayu sebagai bahasa kedua. Tesis Master Sains Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang. Mohd. Majid Konting. (1990).Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Mok, S. S. (2006). Penilaian tahap kecekapan. Selangor: Multimedia-ES Resources. Mok Soon Sang. (2009). Literatur dan kaedah penyelidikan. Puchong: Penerbitan Multimedia Sdn. Bhd. Naceur, A., & Schiefele, U. (2005). Motivation and learning-The role of interest in construction of representation of text and long-term retention: Inter-and intraindividual analyses. European Journal of Psychology of Education, XXn2, 155-170. Niemivirta, M., & Tapola, A. (2007). Self-efficacy, interest, and task performance. Zeitschrift fir Padagogische Psychologie, 21, 241-250. Norlia Abd. Aziz, T. Subahan M. Meerah, Lilia Halim, & Kamisah Osman. (2006). Hubungan antara motivasi, gaya pembelajaran dengan pencapaian matematik tambahan pelajar tingkatan empat. Jurnal Pendidikan 31, 123-141. Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. NJ. Columbus, Ohio: Merril Prentice Hall. Powell, J.P., & Anderson, L.W. (1985). Humour and teaching in higher education. Studies in Higher Education. 10(1), 79-90. Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum. (2003). Sukatan pelajaran & huraian sukatan pelajaran Bahasa Melayu kelas peralihan. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Quek Miow Leng. (2006). Hubungan antara sikap, minat, pengajaran guru dan pengaruh rakan sebaya dengan pencapaian Matematik di kalangan pelajar Tingkatan Empat di daerah Batu Pahat, Johor. Tesis M.Ed., Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Roselan Baki. (2003). Pengajaran dan pembelajaran penulisan Bahasa Melayu. Kuala Lumpur: Karisma Publication Sdn. Bhd. Saat Md Yassin. (2007). Teknik mendorong pelajar belajar tanpa membunuh semangat mereka. Kuala Lumpur: Institut Terjemahan Negara Malaysia Bhd. Saedah Siraj, Zainun Ishak & Tunku Mhani Tunku Mokhtar. (1996). Motivasi dalam pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publication & Distributors Sdn. Bhd. Sekaran, U. (2003). Research methods for business: A skill building approach (4th. Ed). New York: John Wiley & sons Inc. Seman Salleh. (2005). Perlaksanaan pengajaran dan pembelajaran Bahasa Melayu : Kajian kes di sebuah sekolah rendah di daerah Jerantut, Pahang Darul Makmur. Institut Perguruan Bahasa-bahasa Antarabangsa, Kuala Lumpur. Shahril @ Charil Hj. Marzuki. (1998).Pengajaran guru yang berkesan berdasarkan model Slavin: satu kajian di sekolah rendah berkesan di Malaysia. Kertas kerja seminar JPPG pendidikan guru untuk sekolah berkesan yang tidak diterbitkan. Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Malaya. Shuell, T.J. (1996). Teaching and learning in a classroom context. Dalam Berliner, D.C. & Calfer, R.C. (pnyt.), Handbook of educational psychology. New York: Prentice Hall. Sidi, H. & Shaharom, M.H. (2002). Mengurus stres: Pendekatan yang praktikal. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Siti Ruzaiha Mohd Riffin. (2007, 24 Januari). Memperkasakan pengajaran dan pembelajaran Bahasa Melayu dalam sistem persekolahan. Berita Harian. m.s. 2: 1. Slavin, R.E. (1994). Quality, appropriateness, incentive and time: a model of instructional effectiveness. Educational Effectiveness Research. 21(2), 141-156. Slavin, R.E, & Cheung, A. ( 2005). A synthesis of research on language of reading instruction for English language learners. Review of Educational Research Summer. 75(2), 247-284. Sporen, W., Mulder, M., & Hoeken, M. (1998). The role of interest and text structure in professional reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 21, 109-120. Tengku Sharifah Bt. Tuan Yusoff. (2004). Masalah minat pelajar-pelajar tahun enam dan pendekatan guru terhadap soalan penyelesaian masalah bagi mata pelajaran Matematik: satu tinjauan di sekolah kebangsaan Kubang Kerian 1 di Negeri Kelantan. Tesis M.Ed., Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris. Teo, K.S.(1997). Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu: penilaian kandungan dalam konteks skop Bahasa Melayu. JurnaI Dewan Bahasa, 41 (6). Trend, R. (2005). Individual, situational and topic interest in geoscience among 11 and 12 year old children. Reseach Papers in Education. 20. 271-302. Tsai, Y.-M., Kunter, M., Ludtke, O., Trautwein, U., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). What makes lessons interesting? The role of situational and individual factors in three school subjects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 460-472. Usha Devi a/p Chinnappan. (2000). Keberkesananpenggunaan bahan multimedia dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran Sejarah Tingkatan Satu di antara sekolah menengah bestari dan sekolah menengah biasa. Tesis M.Ed., Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Malaya. Weiss, I.R., & Pasley, J.D. (2004). What is high-quality instruction. Educational Leadership. 61(5).[0n-line]. Available: http://search.Global.epnet .com/login.asp. Wessel, D., Zahn, C., & Hesse, F. W. (2007). Integrating situational interest and interest trails with mobile learning in an informal setting. IADIS International Conference Mobile Learning. 163-166. Wong Khek Seng. (1995). Kesinambungan topic dalam Bahasa Melayu. Perpustakaan Negara Malaysia. Wong Kwok Shing, & Richard. (2006). Enhancing English among second language learners: the pre-school years. Early Years, 26(3), 279-293. Zakaria Hj. Ibrahim. (1997). Sikap terkadap Bakasa Melayu dan amalan komunikasi di Kalangan murid-murid tahun enam. Serdang: Fakulti Pendidikan Universiti Putera Malaysia. Zulkifley Hamid.(2005). Penilaian pengajaran dan pembelajaran Bahasa Melayu. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Similar Items