Hubungan antara tingkah laku kepimpinan pengetua dengan tahap stres kerja dalam kalangan guru sekolah menengah daerah Kapit, Sarawak

The aim of this study was to identify the relationship between principal leadership behavior and the level of role stress among secondary school teachers in Kapit district, Sarawak. A total of 153 teachers were randomly selected as respondents. Cross-sectional survey method was used in this study....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kelly, Anak Medan
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
Published: 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/4828/1/s802741.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4828/2/s802741_abstract.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.4828
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
advisor Sin, Ishak
topic LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
spellingShingle LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
Kelly, Anak Medan
Hubungan antara tingkah laku kepimpinan pengetua dengan tahap stres kerja dalam kalangan guru sekolah menengah daerah Kapit, Sarawak
description The aim of this study was to identify the relationship between principal leadership behavior and the level of role stress among secondary school teachers in Kapit district, Sarawak. A total of 153 teachers were randomly selected as respondents. Cross-sectional survey method was used in this study. Data were gathered using questionnaires. The instruments used in this study were Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire (LBDQ) that was developed by Halpin (1966) to measure the principal leadership behavior. Meanwhile, teacher role stress questionnaire that was used by Conley and Woosley (1999) to measure the level of role stress amongst teachers. The data were analyzed using the Statistical Package of Social Sciences (SPSS) Version 12.0 for Windows. There were 31 teachers involved in the pilot study that have been made and the alpha Cronbach reliability value of 0.84 was obtained for initiating structure dimension and 0.85 for consideration dimension of leadership behavior. Meanwhile, for teacher role stress instrument, the alpha Cronbach reliability value of 0.89 was obtained. Therefore, both instruments that have been used in this study were having a high reliability to be used. The results of the study indicated that the level of role stress among the secondary school teachers in Kapit district were moderate (mean = 2.72, s.d = 0.85). The principal in Kapit district more on initiating structure dimension (mean = 3.62, s.d = 0.51) compared to consideration dimension (mean = 3.44, s.d = 0.72) of leadership behavior. Beside that, the result also indicated that there was a significant difference in respect to demographic such as gender and teaching experience but there was no significant difference in respect to demographic such as service group and marital status. There was a weak significant relationship between both dimension of leadership behavior which is initiating structure dimension (r = -0.25) and consideration dimension (r = -0.40) but in negative associated. Overall, There was a weak significant (r = -0.38) relationship between leadership behavior and the level of role stress among the secondary school teachers in Kapit district but in negative relationship
format Thesis
qualification_name masters
qualification_level Master's degree
author Kelly, Anak Medan
author_facet Kelly, Anak Medan
author_sort Kelly, Anak Medan
title Hubungan antara tingkah laku kepimpinan pengetua dengan tahap stres kerja dalam kalangan guru sekolah menengah daerah Kapit, Sarawak
title_short Hubungan antara tingkah laku kepimpinan pengetua dengan tahap stres kerja dalam kalangan guru sekolah menengah daerah Kapit, Sarawak
title_full Hubungan antara tingkah laku kepimpinan pengetua dengan tahap stres kerja dalam kalangan guru sekolah menengah daerah Kapit, Sarawak
title_fullStr Hubungan antara tingkah laku kepimpinan pengetua dengan tahap stres kerja dalam kalangan guru sekolah menengah daerah Kapit, Sarawak
title_full_unstemmed Hubungan antara tingkah laku kepimpinan pengetua dengan tahap stres kerja dalam kalangan guru sekolah menengah daerah Kapit, Sarawak
title_sort hubungan antara tingkah laku kepimpinan pengetua dengan tahap stres kerja dalam kalangan guru sekolah menengah daerah kapit, sarawak
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department College of Arts and Sciences (CAS)
publishDate 2010
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/4828/1/s802741.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4828/2/s802741_abstract.pdf
_version_ 1747827810326544384
spelling my-uum-etd.48282015-08-06T02:33:09Z Hubungan antara tingkah laku kepimpinan pengetua dengan tahap stres kerja dalam kalangan guru sekolah menengah daerah Kapit, Sarawak 2010 Kelly, Anak Medan Sin, Ishak College of Arts and Sciences (CAS) Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts and Sciences LB2801-3095 School administration and organization The aim of this study was to identify the relationship between principal leadership behavior and the level of role stress among secondary school teachers in Kapit district, Sarawak. A total of 153 teachers were randomly selected as respondents. Cross-sectional survey method was used in this study. Data were gathered using questionnaires. The instruments used in this study were Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire (LBDQ) that was developed by Halpin (1966) to measure the principal leadership behavior. Meanwhile, teacher role stress questionnaire that was used by Conley and Woosley (1999) to measure the level of role stress amongst teachers. The data were analyzed using the Statistical Package of Social Sciences (SPSS) Version 12.0 for Windows. There were 31 teachers involved in the pilot study that have been made and the alpha Cronbach reliability value of 0.84 was obtained for initiating structure dimension and 0.85 for consideration dimension of leadership behavior. Meanwhile, for teacher role stress instrument, the alpha Cronbach reliability value of 0.89 was obtained. Therefore, both instruments that have been used in this study were having a high reliability to be used. The results of the study indicated that the level of role stress among the secondary school teachers in Kapit district were moderate (mean = 2.72, s.d = 0.85). The principal in Kapit district more on initiating structure dimension (mean = 3.62, s.d = 0.51) compared to consideration dimension (mean = 3.44, s.d = 0.72) of leadership behavior. Beside that, the result also indicated that there was a significant difference in respect to demographic such as gender and teaching experience but there was no significant difference in respect to demographic such as service group and marital status. There was a weak significant relationship between both dimension of leadership behavior which is initiating structure dimension (r = -0.25) and consideration dimension (r = -0.40) but in negative associated. Overall, There was a weak significant (r = -0.38) relationship between leadership behavior and the level of role stress among the secondary school teachers in Kapit district but in negative relationship 2010 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/4828/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/4828/1/s802741.pdf text eng validuser https://etd.uum.edu.my/4828/2/s802741_abstract.pdf text eng public http://lintas.uum.edu.my:8080/elmu/index.jsp?module=webopac-l&action=fullDisplayRetriever.jsp&szMaterialNo=0000804240 masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Abdul Ghani, A., Abd. Rahman, A. A. & Mohammed, Z. A. (2008). Gaya-gaya kepimpinan dalam pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: PTS Professional. Abdull Rahim, C. L. (2003). Tingkah laku kepimpinan pengetua dan hubungannya dengan kepuasan kerja dan tekanan kerja guru-guru sekolah menengah di kawasan Felda, Jengka Pahang. Tesis Sarjana Muda. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Ahmad Isa. (1998). Tekanan kerja ddam kalangan guru-guru kemahiran hidup sekolah menengah di Daerah Pekan dan Rompin. Tesis Sarjana Muda. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Ainon Mohd. (2005). Teori dan teknik kepimpinan: Panduan aplikasi di tempat kerja. Pahang: PTS Professional. Aminudin Mohd Yusuf. (1994). Kepimpinan, motivasi dan prestasi: Model guru dan tentera. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Atan, L., Ishak, R., Abdul Aziz, S., Mohd Nor, L., Mohd Sahari, N., Nik Ahmad, H.I., Ratnawati., A. & Rosnani, H. (1991). Faktor-faktor yang menyumbang kepada peningkatan kemajuan sekolah. Kajian kes. Kertas kerja seminar latihan mengajar antara universiti kali ke-7. Universiti Islam Antarabangsa. Ayob Jantan. (2005). Pengetua sekolah yang efektif Kuala Lumpur: PTS Professional. Azizi, Y. & Tee, S. K. (2006). Tahap stres dan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi stres guru aliran teknik sekolah menengah teknik di Johor, Melaka, Selangor dan Negeri Sembilan. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Azizi, Y., Shahrin, H., Jamdudin, R., Yusof, B., & Abdul Rahim, H. (2007). Menguasai penyelidikan dalam pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: PTS Professional. Bartol, K. M. & Martin, D. C. (1994). Management. New York: McGraw-Hill. Borg, M. G., Riding, R. J. & Falzon, J. M. (1991). Stress in teaching: A study of occupational stress and its determinants, job satisfaction and career commitment among primary school teachers. Educational Psychology, 11(1), ms. 59-75. Brinslin, R. W. (1970). Back translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 1, ms. 185-216. Che Noh Muda. (1995). Hubungan antara gaya kepimpinan pengetua dengan tahap motivasi guru-guru sekolah berasrama penuh di Wilayah Persekutuan. Latihan Ilmiah Sarjana Sains Pembangunan. Universiti Utara Malaysia. Tidak diterbitkan. Chaplain, R. P. (1995). Stress and satisfaction: A study of English primary school teachers. Educational Psychology. 15(4), ms. 473-489. Conley, S., & Woosley, S. A. (1999). Teacher role stress, higher order needs and outcomes. Journal of Educational Administration, 38, ms. 179-201. Cooper, C. L. (1981). Psychology and management. London: The Macmillan Press Limited. Cooper, C. L. & Marshall, J. (1976). Occupational source of stress: Overview of the literature relating to coronary heart disease and mental health. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 49, ms. 11-28. Dunham, J, (1992). Stress in teaching. Second edition. London; Routledge, Elangovan, A. R. & Jia, L. X. (1999). Effect of perceived power of supervisor on subordinate stress and motivation: The moderating subordinate Characteristic. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(3), ms. 359-373. Farber, B. A. (1991). Crisis in Education: Stress and Burnout in the American Teacher. San Francisco: Jassey Bass. Fiedler, F. E. (1967). A theory of leadership effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill. Fontana, D. & Abouserie, R. (1993). Stress level, gender and personality factors in teachers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, ms 261-270. Goh, K. N. (2007). Hubungan stres dengan prestasi keja dalam kalangan guru sekolah menengah kebangsaan di negeri Perlis. Tesis Sarjana Universiti Utara Malaysia. Gold, Y. & Roth, R.A. (1993). Teachers managing stress and preventing burnout: The professional health solution. London: The Falmer Press. Harun, A. H. T. (2006). Menangani Konflik emosi menurut pandangan Islam. Selangor Edusystem Sdn. Bhd. Halpin, A. W. (1957). Leader behavior description questionnaire. Columbus: The Ohio State University. Halpin, A. W. (1966). Theory and research in education. New York: Macmillan. Helen, M., Rojiah, A,, Nor'azian, R, Eldrana, A. D., & Mustafa, K. M. (2005). Hubungan punca stres dengan tahap stress di kalangan guru-guru sekolah menengah Agama Johor Bahru. Kertas Kerja Seminar Fakulti Pendidikan 2005. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Hersey, P. & Blanchard, K. H. (1988).Management of organizational behavior: Utilizing human resources. Eaglewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Hussein Mahmud. (1993). Pemimpin dan keberkesanan sekolah. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Ismail Mustafa. (2008). Kepimpinan dalam pendidikan, teori dan amalan. Kedah: Pure Honey Enterprise. James, C.Q. & Jonathan, D.Q. (1984). Organizational stress and prevention management. New York: McGraw-Hill. Kamus Dewan. (2005). Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Kassim. (1990). Hubungan antara tekanan dan kepuasan kerja dan kecenderungan untuk berhenti kerja di kalangan guru-guru KBSM. Latihan Ilmiah. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2001). Pembangunan Pendidikan 2001-2010: Perancangan Bersepadu Penjana Kecemerlangan Pendidikan. Kerlinger, F. (1973). Foundations of behavioral research. New York. Holt, Reinhart & Winston. Krejcie, R. V. & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(30), ms. 607-610. Kyriacou, C & Sutcliffe, J. (1977). Teacher stress. A Review. Educational Review, 29(4), ms. 299-306. Kyriacou, C & Sutcliffe, J. (1978a). A Model of teacher stress. Educational Studies, 4(1), ms. 1-6. Kyriacou, C & Sutcliffe, J. (1978b). Teacher stress: prevalence, sources and symptom. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 48, ms. 159-167. Kyriacou, C & Sutcliffe, J. (1979). Teacher stress and Satisfaction. Educational Research, 21, ms. 89-96. Kyriacou, C & Chien, P. Y., (2004). Teacher stress in Taiwanese primary schools. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 5(2), ms. 86-104. Leedy, P. D. (1993). Practical research: Planning and design. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company. Mohd Azhar Abd. Hamid. (2004). EQ- Panduan meningkatkan Kecerdasan emosi. Pahang: PTS Publications & Distributors. Mohd. Majid Konting. (1990). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Mohd Najib, A. G. (1999). Penyelidikan pendidikan. Johor Bahru: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Mohd Najib, A. G. (2003). Reka bentuk tinjauan soal selidik pendidikan. Johor Bahru: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Mohd Salleh Lebar. (1994). Asas psikologi perkembangan. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publication & Distributors. Mohd Taib Dora dm Hamdan Abd. Kadir. (2006). Mengurus stres. Selangor: PTS Professional. Naylor, C. (2001). What do British Colombia teachers consider to be the most significant aspects of workload and stress in their work? British Columbia Teachers' Federation Research Report. ms. 1-19. Nor Hanani Hussin. (2007). Membina sukses tanpa stres. Selangor: Edusystem Sdn. Bhd. Norhannan Ramli & Jamaliah Abdul Harnid. (2006). Gaya kepirnpinan pengetua wanita dan hubungannya dengan tahap motivasi guru sekolah menengah. Jurnal Pendidikan, 31, ms. 53-69. Norlia Goolamally & Jamil Ahmad. (2008). Pemilihan pengetua sekolah ke arah kelestarian kepimpinan: Satu Pemikiran Semula Kertas Kerja. Institut Aminudin Baki. Omardin Ashaari. (1996). Pengurusan sekolah: Satu panduan lengkap. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publication. Pettegrew, L. S. & Wolf, G. E. (1982). Validating measures of teacher stress. American Educational Research Journal, 19 (3), ms. 373-396. Rosli Che Hassan (2003). Tingkah laku kepimpinan pengetua dan tahap kepuasan bekerja guru di sekolah-sekolah menengah yang mempunyai tingkatan enam. Tesis Sarjana. Universiti Utara Malaysia. Rowntree, D. (1981), Statistics without tear: A primer for non mathematicians. London: Penguin. Rui, G. A., Maria Joao, S., & Salome, M. (2006). Problems and challenges on teaching activity: A study on high school teachers' stress, "burnout", physical health and professional fulfillment. Rev. Port. De Educacao, 19(1), ms. 67-93. Sadri Hj. Karim. (1998). Tingkah laku kepimpinan pengetua dan hubungannya dengan kepuasan, tekanan dan prestasi kerja guru-guru sekolah menengah di Daerah Bera. Disertasi Sarjana Pendidikan. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Sayed Hesham Idris. (2007, 23 Julai). Warden pertahan rendam 200 pelajar dalam kolam. Utusan Malaysia. Seltzer, J. & Numerof, R. E. (1988). Supervisory leadership and subordinate burnout: Academy of Management Journal, 31(2), ms. 439-449. Selye, H. (1976). The stress of life. Second edition. New York: McGraw-Hill. Shahril @ Charil Marzuki. (2000). Ciri-ciri kepemimpinan pengetua dan guru besar berkesan yang dapat menghadapi cabaran dan harapan pada abad ke-2 1. Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan. Institut Aminuddin Baki. 10(2). Siti Fatimah Awang. (1993). Hubungan antara pengurusan masa dengan tahap ketegangan dalam kalangan pengetua sekolah menengah. Tesis Sarjana. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Smith, M. & Cooper, C. (1994). Leadership and stress. Leadership & Organizational Development Journal, 15(2), ms. 3-7. Soh, K. C. (1987). Teacher stress as a correlate of attitudes towards responsibility and change: Singapore Journal of Education. 8(1). Stogdill, R. M. (1948). Personal factors associated with leadership: A survey of the literature. Journal of Psychology, 25, ms. 35-71. Suaidah Ahmad. (1983). Tingkah laku kepimpinan guru besar dan hubungannya dengan kepuasan, tekanan dan prestasi kerja guru. Latihan Ilmiah Sarjana Muda. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Sullivan, S. E. & Bhagat, R. S. (1992). Organizational stress, job satisfaction and job performance: Where do we go fiorn here? Journal of Management, 18(2), ms. 353-374. Tay, S. N. & Smith, P. J. (1990). Managing stress: A guide to Asian living. Singapore: Federal Publication. Tinah Naim. (2007). Gaya kepimpinan pengetua dan hubungannya dengan stres guru di sebuah daerah di negeri Johor. Tesis Sarjana. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Vecchio, R. P. (1991). Organizational behavior. USA: The Rryden Press. Yates, J. E. (1979). Managing Stress. United Stated AMACOM: A Division of American Management Association. Yulk, G. A. (1998). Leadership in organizational. 4th Ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Yulk, G. A. (2002). Leadership in organizational. 5th Ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Zulkeflee Yaacob. (2007, 23 Julai). Guru mesti didik bukan dera pelajar. Berita Harian. Zunaidah Jarnaludin. (1990). Hubungan di antara kepuasan kerja dan tekanan kerja dengan ketidakhadiran kerja di samping menguji teori Herzberg. Tesis Sarjana Muda. Universiti Malaya.