Kompetensi pengurusan dan pelaksanaan kokurikulum dalam kalangan penolong kanan kokurikulum di sekolah-sekolah menengah daerah Kota Kinabalu

Kompetensi pengurusan dan pelaksanaan kokurikulum dalam kalangan penolong kanan kokurikulum di sekolah-sekolah menengah daerah Kota Kinabalu

This study aimed to identify the competencies and levels of management and implementation of the Senior Assistant Co curriculum. The sample consists of 17 Senior Assistant Co, 17 principals and 68 Coordinating Unit Co-curriculum of secondary schools in the district of Kota Kinabalu which comprises o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Alizah, Abdul Majid
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
Published: 2010
Subjects:
LB Theory and practice of education
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/4848/1/s802620.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4848/2/s802620_abstract.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.4848
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
advisor Kassim, Mustapa
topic LB Theory and practice of education
spellingShingle LB Theory and practice of education
Alizah, Abdul Majid
Kompetensi pengurusan dan pelaksanaan kokurikulum dalam kalangan penolong kanan kokurikulum di sekolah-sekolah menengah daerah Kota Kinabalu
description This study aimed to identify the competencies and levels of management and implementation of the Senior Assistant Co curriculum. The sample consists of 17 Senior Assistant Co, 17 principals and 68 Coordinating Unit Co-curriculum of secondary schools in the district of Kota Kinabalu which comprises of school (a) One and two conference (b) Number of students more than 1000 and less than 1000. Information related to the level of competence and level of curriculum offered by the management of three perceptions of (a) Senior Assistant Co-curriculum perception, and (b) Principal perception (c) Co-Curriculum Unit Coordinator perception. Practice Management Senior Assistant Co-curriculum is based on the principles of management, namely planning, leading, controlling and evaluating. Questionnaires based on Likert scale is used as the survey method to collect and analyze data in this study will be conducted. Descriptive statistics were used to answer research questions, while the inferential statistics, t-test, One Way ANOVA and Pearson Correlation test used to test the hypothesis. The study showed that the level of competence and level of management and implementation of the Senior Assistant Cocurriculum in all aspects at a high level. T-test showed significant difference between the levels of Senior Assistant Co-curriculum competencies in the school first and second press conference and there was no significant difference in the levels of management and implementation of Senior Assistant Co-curriculum in schools with more students in 1000 with the Senior Assistant of Co-curriculum in schools has 1000 pupils. One Way ANOVA test showed significant difference between the mean of five years experience with min 1-5 years of experience mean that the group had been less than a year. The Pearson correlation test showed significant correlation between the levels of Senior Assistant Co-curriculum competencies with the management and implementation by the Senior Assistant Co-curriculum. The analysis of students' achievements, the school a conference be achieved Grade A and Grade B is higher than the performance of two conference schools. This shows the level of Senior Assistant Co-curriculum competencies related to student achievement
format Thesis
qualification_name masters
qualification_level Master's degree
author Alizah, Abdul Majid
author_facet Alizah, Abdul Majid
author_sort Alizah, Abdul Majid
title Kompetensi pengurusan dan pelaksanaan kokurikulum dalam kalangan penolong kanan kokurikulum di sekolah-sekolah menengah daerah Kota Kinabalu
title_short Kompetensi pengurusan dan pelaksanaan kokurikulum dalam kalangan penolong kanan kokurikulum di sekolah-sekolah menengah daerah Kota Kinabalu
title_full Kompetensi pengurusan dan pelaksanaan kokurikulum dalam kalangan penolong kanan kokurikulum di sekolah-sekolah menengah daerah Kota Kinabalu
title_fullStr Kompetensi pengurusan dan pelaksanaan kokurikulum dalam kalangan penolong kanan kokurikulum di sekolah-sekolah menengah daerah Kota Kinabalu
title_full_unstemmed Kompetensi pengurusan dan pelaksanaan kokurikulum dalam kalangan penolong kanan kokurikulum di sekolah-sekolah menengah daerah Kota Kinabalu
title_sort kompetensi pengurusan dan pelaksanaan kokurikulum dalam kalangan penolong kanan kokurikulum di sekolah-sekolah menengah daerah kota kinabalu
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department College of Arts and Sciences (CAS)
publishDate 2010
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/4848/1/s802620.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4848/2/s802620_abstract.pdf
_version_ 1747827813839273984
spelling my-uum-etd.48482015-08-11T04:09:56Z Kompetensi pengurusan dan pelaksanaan kokurikulum dalam kalangan penolong kanan kokurikulum di sekolah-sekolah menengah daerah Kota Kinabalu 2010 Alizah, Abdul Majid Kassim, Mustapa College of Arts and Sciences (CAS) Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts and Sciences LB Theory and practice of education This study aimed to identify the competencies and levels of management and implementation of the Senior Assistant Co curriculum. The sample consists of 17 Senior Assistant Co, 17 principals and 68 Coordinating Unit Co-curriculum of secondary schools in the district of Kota Kinabalu which comprises of school (a) One and two conference (b) Number of students more than 1000 and less than 1000. Information related to the level of competence and level of curriculum offered by the management of three perceptions of (a) Senior Assistant Co-curriculum perception, and (b) Principal perception (c) Co-Curriculum Unit Coordinator perception. Practice Management Senior Assistant Co-curriculum is based on the principles of management, namely planning, leading, controlling and evaluating. Questionnaires based on Likert scale is used as the survey method to collect and analyze data in this study will be conducted. Descriptive statistics were used to answer research questions, while the inferential statistics, t-test, One Way ANOVA and Pearson Correlation test used to test the hypothesis. The study showed that the level of competence and level of management and implementation of the Senior Assistant Cocurriculum in all aspects at a high level. T-test showed significant difference between the levels of Senior Assistant Co-curriculum competencies in the school first and second press conference and there was no significant difference in the levels of management and implementation of Senior Assistant Co-curriculum in schools with more students in 1000 with the Senior Assistant of Co-curriculum in schools has 1000 pupils. One Way ANOVA test showed significant difference between the mean of five years experience with min 1-5 years of experience mean that the group had been less than a year. The Pearson correlation test showed significant correlation between the levels of Senior Assistant Co-curriculum competencies with the management and implementation by the Senior Assistant Co-curriculum. The analysis of students' achievements, the school a conference be achieved Grade A and Grade B is higher than the performance of two conference schools. This shows the level of Senior Assistant Co-curriculum competencies related to student achievement 2010 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/4848/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/4848/1/s802620.pdf text eng validuser https://etd.uum.edu.my/4848/2/s802620_abstract.pdf text eng public http://lintas.uum.edu.my:8080/elmu/index.jsp?module=webopac-l&action=fullDisplayRetriever.jsp&szMaterialNo=0000803597 masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Abdul Alim Abdul Rahim. (1995). Siri pendidikan perguruan: pengurusan kokurikulum. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Fajar Bakti. Abdul Shukor Abdullah. (1998). Pengetua berkesan : Sekolah berkesan cabaran pembangunan sistem pendidikan negara. Kertas kerja. IAB, Genting Highlands, 3 Mac. Alias Abdul Samad. (1999). Peranan dan penglibatan pengetua dalam mempertingkatkan disiplin pelajar di sekolah menengah Felda Daerah Tampin Negeri Sembilan. Projek Penyelidikan. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Amstrong, M & Baron, A. (2000). Performance management. London: Chartered Institute of Personal and Development. Anastasia, A. (1982). Psychological testing. New York: William and Sons Inc. Arsaythamby Veloo & Arumugam Raman. (2009).Panduan menganalisis & menginterperetasi data. Penerbitan Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Kedah. Ali bin Ismail. (2000). Tinjauan pengurusan dan pentadbiran program aktiviti kokurikulum sukan dan permainan di sekolah-sekolah menengah Negara Brunei Darussalam. Projek sarjana. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (1992). Kajian tugas guru besar, penolong kanan I, penolong kanan II, penolong kanan kokurikulum, penyelia petang dan guru-guru sekolah rendah. Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. Baldwin, L.,Coney, F., Fardig, D., & Thomas, R. (1993). School effectiveness questionnaire manual. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation. Barker, S., (1997). Is your successor in your schoolhouse? Finding principle candidates. NASSP Bulletin, 85-91. Bass Bernard M. (1990). Bass and Stodgill's hand book of leadership theory, research and managerial application. (Ed. Ke-3) New York: The Free Press. Berita Harian. (2002). 6 Disember. Blandford, S., (1995). Pengurusan peringkat pertengahan di sekolah - Bagaimana menyelaraskan pengurusan dan pengajaran untuk sekolah yang efektif: (Kuala Lumpur: Institut Terjemahan Negara Malaysia Berhad). Blake, J. A., & Champion, D. J. (1976). Method and issues in social research. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Boyatzis, R.E., McBer and company. (1982). The competent manager: A model for effective performance. New York: A Wiley-Interscience Publication John Wiley & Sons. Cohen, M., (1983). Instructional management and social conditions in effective schools, in school finance and school improvement: Linkages in the 1980s, edited by A. O. Webb and L. D. Webb. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger. Daresh, J. & Male, T., (2000). Crossing the border into leadership: Experiences of newly appointed British - headteachers and American principals. Journal of the British Educational Management and Administration 28: 89-101. Daud Ibrahim. (2003). Concise student dictionary. Petaling Jaya: Sasbadi. Sdn. Bhd. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. (1999). Kamus Dewan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa & Pustaka. German, R. (1995). Co-curricular involvement characteristics of Bowling Green State University Honors Students. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED386138. Getzel, J. W., (1960). Theory and practice in educational administration: An old question revisited. Dalam R.F. Campbell dan J.M. Lipham (ed.). Administrative theory as a guide. Midwest Administrative Centre: University of Chicago. Halpin, A. W. (1966). Administrative theory in education. Toronto: Macmillan Company. Hawa Hassan. (2001). Peranan pengetua dalam kepemimpinan pengajaran bagi meningkatkan keberkesanan sekolah : Satu tinjauan di Sekolah Menengah Daerah Kluang, Johor. Latihan Ilmiah. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Hazi, H.M. (1994). The teacher evaluation- supervision dilemma: A case of entanglements and irreconcilable differences. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision 24(5): 212-217. Hellison, D.R. & Templin, T.T. (1991). A reflective approach to teaching physical education. Campaign, IL: Human Kinetics. Hinkel, D. E., Wiersma, W., & Jurs, S. G. (1998). Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences. Boston: Houghton Mioffin Company. Hussein Mahmood. (1991). Kepimpinan pengajaran: Kekangan dan implikasi. Jurnal Guru (3):193-208. Hornby, A.S. (2000). Advanced learner's Malay dictionary. Shah Alam: Penerbit Fajar Bakti. Hoy, W. K. & Miskel, C. G. (1991). Educational administration theory, research, and practice. New York: Mc Graw Hill, Inc. Jaafar Muhamad. (1999). Kelakuan organisasi. Ed. Ke-3. Kuala Lumpur: Leeds Publications. Jamil Ahmad. (1993). Tinjauan kekangan-kekangan dalam pelaksanaan sains KBSM di sekolah-sekolah di negeri Kedah Darul Arnan. Tesis Sarjana Pendidikan. Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Jegadeva, K. (1990). Guru besar dan pengurusan KBSR: Kelemahan dan kekuatan. Seminar Kurikulum Baru Sekolah Rendah. Institut Aminuddin Baki: Genting Highlands. Johannsen, H. & Page, G.T. (1996). International dictionary of management. Ed. Ke-5. London: Kogan Page. Kamaruzzaman Ismail. (2000). Tahap penggunaan komputer di kalangan pengajar dan pelajar dalam pengajian dan pembelajaran di sebuah Institusi Pengajian Tinggi Swasta. Tesis Sarjana Pendidikan. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Katz, D. & Kahn, R. L. (1966). The social psychology of organization. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (1988). Surat Pekeliling Ikhtisas Bil. 7/1988. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (1985). Surat Pekeliling Ikhtisas Bil. 1/1985. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (1993). Buku panduan pengurusan profesional sekolah menengah oleh Jemaah Nazir Sekolah Persekutuan. KL: Malindo Pronters Sdn. Bhd. Kementerian Pedidikan Malaysia. (2001). Buku panduan pengurusan profrsional sekolah menengah. Dewan Bahasa Dan Pustaka, Kuala Lumpur. Kementerian Pedidikan Malaysia. (1993). Buku panduan pengurusan profesional sekolah menengah. Dewan Bahasa Dan Pustaka, Kuala Lumpur. Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2007). Buku Panduan Penilaian 10% Permarkahan Kokurikulum. Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2001). Laporan audit sekolah. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2009). Fail meja penolong kanan kokurikulum: Manual tugas penolong kokurikulum SMK Perempuan Likas, Kota Kinabalu. Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2009). Data pencapaian kokurikulum sekolah-sekolah daerah Kota Kinabalu. Unit Kokurikulum Sabah. Jabatan Pelajaran Sabah. Kementerian Sumber Manusia. (2003). Penilaian Tahap Kecekapan. Bahagian Sumber Manusia. Kenneth G. Tillman. (1997). The administration of pyhsical education, sports and leisure programs. Massachussett: Needham Height. Klemp, G.O., Jr. (1980). The assessment of occupational competence. (Ed.). Report to the National Institute of Education, Washington, DC. Koontz, H., & Weihrich. H. (1997). Pengurusan. Terjemahaan. Kuala Lurnpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Krejeie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psycological Measurement. 30: 607-610. Laporan Jawatankuasa Kabinet. (1979). Mengkaji pelaksanaan dasar pelajaran. Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Leith, L.M. (1990). Coaches guides to sport administration. Champaign. Illinois: Leisure Press. Lian Yoke Peng. (1990). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi pilihan mahasiswa kamsis Aminuddin Baki Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia dalama aktiviti kokurikulum latihan ilmiah. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Longman. (1995). Dictionary of contemporary English. London: Longman Group. Mohd Majid Konting. (2000). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Malek Shah & Liew Swee Liang. (2002). Model kompetensi dan perkhidmatan awam Malaysia. Jurnal Pengurusan Awam. 1. (Bil2): Hlm 1-15. Mohd. Sahandri Gani Hj. Hamzh. (1995). Kajian pertalian antara pencapaian akademik dengan kemahiran kerja praktik dan konsep kendiri akademik di kalangan pelajar kemahiran hidup bersepadu. (Tesis Sarjana Pendidikan. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia). Mohd. Salleh Lebar. (2000). Pentadbiran pendidikan dan pendidikan di Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Addison Wesley Longman Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. Mohd Yassin Hj. Sulaiman. (1994). Amalan kokurikulum persatuan agama islam dan puteri islam di dua buah sekolah rendah di Shah Alam. (Unpublished master's thesis, University of Malaya). Nasiriah Md Yusuff. (2001). Latihan dalam perkhidmatan: Bidang keperluan di kalangan guru kanan mata pelajaran. Latihan Ilmiah. (Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia). Neela Mehan Manickiam & Arner Hamzah Jantan. (1998). Perkembangan pengurusan di dalam Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia: Paradigma baru dan anjakan kritikal. (Seminar Pengurusan Sumber Manusia Kali Pertama, Institut Arninuddin Baki, Genting Highlands, 14-17 Disember). Nor Aishah Buang. (2002). Asas keusahaan. Shah Alam: Penerbit Fajar Bakti Sdn. Bhd. Oldroyd, D. Elsner, D. & Poster, C. (1996). Educational management today. London: Paul Chapman. Omardin Ashaari. (1998). Pengurusan sekolah : Satu panduan lengkap. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications & Distributors Sdn. Bhd. Omardin Ashaari. (1999). Pengurusan persatuan. Satu Panduan Lengkap. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications & Distributors Sdn. Bhd. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Ed. ke-3. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Pramela Krish. (1996). Co-curricular activities amongs students in a secondary school in Selangor. (Unpublished Master's Thesis. University of Malaya). Purkey, S.D., & Smith, M.S. (1983). Effective schools: A review, Elementary School Journal 83(4): 427-452. Rahimah Hj. Ahmad & Zulkifli Abdul Manaf. (1997). Characteristics of effective and less eSfective schools: A case study from Malaysia Kertas Kerja loth Annual Congress For School Effectiveness And Improvement, Memphis, Tennesse USA, 5-8 Januari. Ramlah Abd. Wahab. (2004). Panduan pengurusan kokurikulum di sekolah. Banter Sdn. Bhd. Kuala Lumpur. Robiah Sidin. (1998). Asas pentadbiran pendidikan. Edisi Kedua. Petaling Jaya: Pustaka Cipta Sdn. Bhd. Roslan Kamarudin. (2000). Persepsi guru-guru kanan terhadap pengetua di dalam pengurusan kewangan sekolah. Projek Penyelidikan Sarjana Pendidikan. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Spencer, L.M., & Spencer, S.M. (1993). Competence at work model for superior performance. New York: J.Wiley & Son. Sergiovanni, T. (1991). Leadership and excellent in schooling. Educational leadership. 41(5): 4-13. Siti Hajar Bt Ismail (2000). Satu kajian mengenai hubungan pengurusan dengan pencapaian dalam bidang kokurikulum. Tesis yang tidak diterbitkan: Universiti Utara Malaysia. Siti Rapiah Abd. Rahman. (1999). Co-curricular and its influence on the quality of student life. (Unpublished Master's Thesis. University of Malaya). Smith,A.W. (1997). Learning is a living system: Learning leaders and organization. Human System Management 16(4):277. Strand, B.N., Scantling, E., & Johnson, M. (1997). Fitness education : Teaching concepts basedfitness in the schools. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Taylor, F. W. (1947). Principles of scientific management. New York : Harper dalam Hoy dan Miskel 1991. Educational Administration Theory Research Practise. Ed 4. New York: McGraw Hill. The Sunday Times. (2000). 12 March. "Up Your CCA Marks, Get Set, Go". Thierauf, F.J., Klekamp, R.C., dan Geeding, D.W. (1997). Management principles and practices: A contingency and questionnaire approach. John Wiley and Sons, New York. Treasury Board of Canada (December 1999). Framework for competency-based management in the public service of Canada. Retrieved July 2002, Retrieved from http://www.tbssct.gc.ca. Wan Mohd Zahid Mohd Noordin. (1994). Wawasan pendidikan: Agenda pengisian. Kuala Lumpur: Cahaya Pantai Publishing (M) Sdn. Bhd. Wee Eng Hoe. (1994). Organisasi dan pentadbiran sukan dan pendidikan jasmani. Shah Alam: Penerbit Fajar Bakti Sdn. Bhd. Wiersma, W. (2000). Research methods in education. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Wong Song King. (2004). Tahap kompetensi dan masalah penolong kanan kokurikulum dalam pengurusan kokurikulum. Tesis yang tidak diterbitkan: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Zaidatol Akmaliah Lope Phie & Foo Say Fooi. (2003). Pengurusan & kepimpinan pendidikan. Satu langkah ke hadapan. Serdang: Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia. Zainal Abidin Mohamad. (1999). Pengurusan strategik di sektor pendidikan. Serdang: Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia. Zaiton binti Md. Noor (2001). Masalah-masalah yang dihadapi oleh pengetua dan guru besar yang baru dilantik. Projek sarjana. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Similar Items