Pembelajaran koperatif dalam mata pelajaran Bahasa Arab Komunikasi tahap dua di sekolah kebangsaan

This study aims to observe the implementation and effectiveness of using the cooperative learning in teaching communicative arabic language for year 4, 5 and 6. The study is to examine the needs to use cooperative learning to motivate the students in learning and to enhance the students' ach...

وصف كامل

محفوظ في:
التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
المؤلف الرئيسي: Yasrina, Yaacob
التنسيق: أطروحة
اللغة:eng
eng
منشور في: 2010
الموضوعات:
الوصول للمادة أونلاين:https://etd.uum.edu.my/4849/1/s800687.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4849/2/s800687_abstract.pdf
الوسوم: إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
id my-uum-etd.4849
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
advisor Mohd Yusoff, Nurahimah
topic LB1025-1050.75 Teaching (Principles and practice)
spellingShingle LB1025-1050.75 Teaching (Principles and practice)
Yasrina, Yaacob
Pembelajaran koperatif dalam mata pelajaran Bahasa Arab Komunikasi tahap dua di sekolah kebangsaan
description This study aims to observe the implementation and effectiveness of using the cooperative learning in teaching communicative arabic language for year 4, 5 and 6. The study is to examine the needs to use cooperative learning to motivate the students in learning and to enhance the students' achievement. The respondents in this study were 120 students and 6 teachers from Sekolah Kebangsaan Dato Wan Mohd Saman, Tandop Alor Setar and an officer in Kedah Education Department. The data collected were analysed through observation. The observation instrument was adapted &om the observation form used by the Ministry of Education. Triangulation method was used through the interview, observation and document analysis. The information from various sources were gathered to support the findings. The result showed that the teachers have used the cooperative method of learning as their teaching strategy subject to the content of the lesson and the preparation. The study also showed the effectiveness of implementing the cooperative learning. However, due to constraint of teaching time which is two periods a week, this strategy is a bit cumbersome to be implemented. The implication of this research pointed out that teachers are encouraged to be more creative in implementing this strategy with well-planned 1esson.The introduction of a 5 period-a-week for Arabic Language for j-QAF cohort 2009 would hopefully entice the implementation of this method in order to enhance the level of effectiveness and students' interest. It is hoped that the additional period could be expanded to all schools and further research could be implemented in the area of research
format Thesis
qualification_name masters
qualification_level Master's degree
author Yasrina, Yaacob
author_facet Yasrina, Yaacob
author_sort Yasrina, Yaacob
title Pembelajaran koperatif dalam mata pelajaran Bahasa Arab Komunikasi tahap dua di sekolah kebangsaan
title_short Pembelajaran koperatif dalam mata pelajaran Bahasa Arab Komunikasi tahap dua di sekolah kebangsaan
title_full Pembelajaran koperatif dalam mata pelajaran Bahasa Arab Komunikasi tahap dua di sekolah kebangsaan
title_fullStr Pembelajaran koperatif dalam mata pelajaran Bahasa Arab Komunikasi tahap dua di sekolah kebangsaan
title_full_unstemmed Pembelajaran koperatif dalam mata pelajaran Bahasa Arab Komunikasi tahap dua di sekolah kebangsaan
title_sort pembelajaran koperatif dalam mata pelajaran bahasa arab komunikasi tahap dua di sekolah kebangsaan
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department College of Arts and Sciences (CAS)
publishDate 2010
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/4849/1/s800687.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4849/2/s800687_abstract.pdf
_version_ 1747827814099320832
spelling my-uum-etd.48492015-08-11T04:09:51Z Pembelajaran koperatif dalam mata pelajaran Bahasa Arab Komunikasi tahap dua di sekolah kebangsaan 2010 Yasrina, Yaacob Mohd Yusoff, Nurahimah College of Arts and Sciences (CAS) Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts and Sciences LB1025-1050.75 Teaching (Principles and practice) This study aims to observe the implementation and effectiveness of using the cooperative learning in teaching communicative arabic language for year 4, 5 and 6. The study is to examine the needs to use cooperative learning to motivate the students in learning and to enhance the students' achievement. The respondents in this study were 120 students and 6 teachers from Sekolah Kebangsaan Dato Wan Mohd Saman, Tandop Alor Setar and an officer in Kedah Education Department. The data collected were analysed through observation. The observation instrument was adapted &om the observation form used by the Ministry of Education. Triangulation method was used through the interview, observation and document analysis. The information from various sources were gathered to support the findings. The result showed that the teachers have used the cooperative method of learning as their teaching strategy subject to the content of the lesson and the preparation. The study also showed the effectiveness of implementing the cooperative learning. However, due to constraint of teaching time which is two periods a week, this strategy is a bit cumbersome to be implemented. The implication of this research pointed out that teachers are encouraged to be more creative in implementing this strategy with well-planned 1esson.The introduction of a 5 period-a-week for Arabic Language for j-QAF cohort 2009 would hopefully entice the implementation of this method in order to enhance the level of effectiveness and students' interest. It is hoped that the additional period could be expanded to all schools and further research could be implemented in the area of research 2010 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/4849/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/4849/1/s800687.pdf text eng validuser https://etd.uum.edu.my/4849/2/s800687_abstract.pdf text eng public http://lintas.uum.edu.my:8080/elmu/index.jsp?module=webopac-l&action=fullDisplayRetriever.jsp&szMaterialNo=0000804780 masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Abdul Rahim Abdul Rashid.(1999). Wawasan dan agenda pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur. Utusan Publication & Distributors Sdn. Bhd. Ahmad Najdi. (2001). Keberkesanan pembelajaran secara koperatif dalam mata pelajaran Bahasa Arab Tinggi Tingkatan empat. Projek Sarjana Pendidikan. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Amita Rena Hall, MA. Ed. (2006). Families, children and communities in a multicultural and diverse society. Research Paper on Curricular Models. Nova Southeastern University. Aronson, Elliot (1978). The jigsaw classroom. Newbury, California : Sage Publications. Azizi Yahaya, Shahrin Hashim, Jamaludin Ramli, Musof Boon dan Abdul Rahman Hamdan (2007). Menguasai penyelidikan dalam pendidikan. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia: PTS Professional. Bogden, R.C and Biklen, S.K (1982). Qualitative research for education: An intoduction to theory and methods. Boston: Ally & Bacon. Brown, A. L., & Palincsar, A. S. (1989). Guided, cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. pp. 393-451. Cheah T. T., Adlan A., Baskaran N. dan Lim C. L. (2002). Keberkesaan kaedah pembelajaran koperatif dalam pembelajaran bacaan pemahaman teks di kalangan murid SJK(C) dan SJK(T), Jurnal Pendidikan MPSAH Jld 6, pp 21-35. Cohen, L., Marrion, L., and Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education: (5th Edition). London: Routledgefalmer Damon, W. (1984). Peer education: The Untapped Potential. Journal of Applied Development Psychology 5: pp331-343. Creswell, W.J. (1994). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. David W. Johnson, Roger T. Johnson (1991). Learning mathematics and cooperative learning lessons plans for teachers. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. (lst Edition). Dees, R. L. (1991) The role of cooperative learning in increasing problem-solving in college remedial course. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. Vol. 22. No. 5, pp. 409-421. Deutsch, M. (1949). A theopy of cooperative and competition. Human relations 2: pp. 129-152. Eder, D and Fingerson, L. (2002). Interviewing children and adolescents. In J.F Gubrium and H.A Holstein (Eds), Handbook of intewiem research: Content and method (pp. 181-200). London : Thousand Oaks. Effandi Zakaria and Zanaton Iksan (2006). Promoting cooperative learning in science and mathematics education: A malaysian perspective. Universiti Kebangsaan, Selangor, Malaysia. Gan, T. H. & Wong, S. M. (1995). The effects of cooperative learning on the mathematics achievement and attitudes towards learning mathematics of preservise teachers. Jurnal Penyelidikan Pendidikan MPS. Gan, T. H. (1999). Mencari titik perseimbangan di antara keunggulan teori dan kenyataan praktis: Satu kes pelaksanaan penyelidikan pembelajaran koperatif dalam pengajaran matematik sekolah rendah. Jurnal Penyelidikan Pendidikan MPS, 2, 68-85. Hidhir Ismail (2004). Penggunaan kaedah pernbelajaran koperatif bagi mata pelajaran Balagah peringkat Sijil Menengah Agama di Sekolah Menengah Agama Lughatul Quran, Muar. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia: Tesis Sarjana Muda. Tidak diterbitkan. Intan Sapinas. (2007). Tinjauan amalan pembelaran koperatif di kalanfan pelajar tingkatan dua MRSM Gerik, Perak. Projek Sarjana Pendidikan. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Tidak diterbitkan. Johnson, D.W & Johnson, R (1985). Learning together and alone: Coperative and competitive and individualistic learning. Boston : Allyn & Bacon. (1st Edition). Johnson, D.W & Johnson, W (1985). Learning Together and Alone: Cooperative Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R. T. (2002). Learning together and alone: Overview and metaanalysis. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Holubec, E. J. (1993). Cooperation in the cassroom (6th Edition). Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company. Kagan, S (1992). Cooperative learning resources for teachers. Riverside, CA: University of California at Riverside. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (2007), Panduan penilaian kendalian sekolah rendah Bahasa Arab Komunikasi tahap dua di sekolah kebangsaan. Bahagian Penddikan Islam dan Moral. Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. Lincoln, Y. & Guba, S. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. London: Sage Publication.London: Sage Publications. Mazlan firahin. (2002). Amalan pembelajaran koperatif oleh guru dan kesan ke atas sikap pelajar terhadap matematik. Projek Penyelidikan Sarjana Pendidikan. Universiti Sains Malaysia. Tidak diterbitkan. Merriam, S., 1988. Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. Jossey-Bass Publishers, California, pp: 4-25. Meriam Ismail. (2000). The effects of cooperative learning strategy of TGT on the attitude of year four students toward mathematics in SRK Sekaan Kecil in the District of Matu, Sarawak. Proceeding of the International Conference in Teaching and Learning. pg 1218-1224 Ministry of Education. (2003). Integrated Curriculum for Secondary Schools. Curriculum Specifications. Mathematics Form 3. Mohd. Majid Konting (1988). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. Edisi ke 4. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Mohd. Najib Ghafar (2003). Reka bentuk soal selidik pendidikan. Johor: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Mok Song Sang. (2006).Nota pengurusan pengajaran-pembelajaran. Puchong, Selangor. Multimedia-ES Resources Sdn. Bhd. Ng Kim Choy (1999). Prinsip-prinsip pembelajaran koperatif: Sandakan: Maktab Perguruan Sabah. Tidak Diterbitkan. Nik Mohd Rahimi. (2005). Penilaian kemahiran mendengar dalam kurikulum Bahasa Arab Komunikasi. Tesis Dok. Fal. Fakulti Pendidikan, Bangi UKM. Nisbet, J. dan Watt, J. (1982). Case study. Oxford: Nottingham University, School of Education. Nor Azizah Salleh (2001). Penerapan nilai murni melalui pembelajaran kooperatif Universiti Teknologi Malaysia: Tesis Sarjana Muda. Nor Azizah Salleh (2001). Penerapan nilai murni melalui pembelajaran-koperatif. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia: Tesis Sarjana Muda. Noriah Ishak (2004). Penggunaan peta konsep dan pembelajaran koperatif dalam matapelajaran Sejarah. Jurnal Pendidikan 27: ms 47-53. Piaget, J. (1926). The language and thought of the child. New York: Harcourt Brace. Qais. F, Zainab. A dan Hamidah. M, (2007). Redefining classroom culture through international design. Proceeding of the 1st International Malaysian Educational Technology Convention, (2), Johor Baru, Malaysia. Razman Muhamad. (2001). Satu kajian eksperimen tentang keberkesanan pembelajaran secara koperatif dalam mata pelajaran Bahasa Arab komunikasi. Projek Sarjana. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Tidak diterbitkan. Robert E Slavin (1990). Cooperative learning: Theory research and practise. Englwood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Saedah Siraj, (2001). Perkembangan kurikulum: Teori dan amalan. Sungai Buluh: Alam Pintar Enterprise. Sharan, S (1980).Cooperative learning in small group: Recent method and effect on achievement, attitude and ethnic relations. Review of Journal Educational Research. Siti Hajar Abd Hamid (2007). Pembelajaran koperatif menggunakan e-pembelajaran di kalangan pelajar yang mengambil subjek Telekomunikasi dan Rangkaian, Fakulti Pendidikan, UTM Skudai Johor. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia: Tesis Sarjana Muda. Tidak diterbitkan. Suhaida Abdul Kadir (2002). Perbandingan pembelajaran loperatif dan tradisional terhadap prestasi, atribusi pencapaian, konsep kendiri. akademik dan hubungan sosial dalam pendidikan perakaunan. Universiti Sains Malaysia: Tesis Sarjana Muda. Tidak diterbitkan. Vygotsky, L. H. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Yin. Robert, K. (1984). Case study research: Design and methods. California: Sage Publication. Zainun bt Ismaon (2003). Kesan pembelajaran koperatif model STAD ke atas sikap dan persepsi murid tahun lima dalam mata pelajaran matematik KBSR. Projek Sarjana Pendidikan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Tidak diterbitkan.