Persepsi guru-guru terhadap peranan Guru Besar dalam pelaksanaan program perkembangan staf di sekolah rendah dalam daerah Padawan, Sarawak

Persepsi guru-guru terhadap peranan Guru Besar dalam pelaksanaan program perkembangan staf di sekolah rendah dalam daerah Padawan, Sarawak

The main purpose of this study is to identify teacher's perception towards staff development programme at 4 primary schools in Padawan District, Sarawak. The objectives of this study are to identify the teachers' perception i.e. suitability, planning, implementation, evaluation, support, a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Anthony, Nely
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
Published: 2009
Subjects:
LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/4858/1/s802756.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4858/2/s87193.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.4858
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
advisor Dali, Mohd Hasani
topic LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
spellingShingle LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
Anthony, Nely
Persepsi guru-guru terhadap peranan Guru Besar dalam pelaksanaan program perkembangan staf di sekolah rendah dalam daerah Padawan, Sarawak
description The main purpose of this study is to identify teacher's perception towards staff development programme at 4 primary schools in Padawan District, Sarawak. The objectives of this study are to identify the teachers' perception i.e. suitability, planning, implementation, evaluation, support, and to study teachers' needs in development programme. 100 trained teachers have been chosen as samples of this study. This study used descriptive (Percentage and mean) and inferential methods (T test, One way Anova and Pearson Correlation) to analyze the data. Research findings showed levels of implementation of staff development is high with mean suitability of the programme p=3.00 (male staff and p=38.41 female staff, whereby mean for implementation programme is p=.170, evaluation is p=.000, planning the programme is p=.000, support is p=.000, needs of the programme is p=. 000 and impact of the programme is p=. 000. The finding shows there is significant in all criteria in all criteria tested. Based on the findings, it is suggested that school management especially headmaster to plan and implement staff development programme entirely. Besides, it is also suggested that headmaster and senior assistants exposed to planning and implementation procedure of making the scheme of work of staff development programme. Also suggested, Padawan District Education Department and State Education Department to hold more in service training to help the teachers to develop their knowledge.
format Thesis
qualification_name masters
qualification_level Master's degree
author Anthony, Nely
author_facet Anthony, Nely
author_sort Anthony, Nely
title Persepsi guru-guru terhadap peranan Guru Besar dalam pelaksanaan program perkembangan staf di sekolah rendah dalam daerah Padawan, Sarawak
title_short Persepsi guru-guru terhadap peranan Guru Besar dalam pelaksanaan program perkembangan staf di sekolah rendah dalam daerah Padawan, Sarawak
title_full Persepsi guru-guru terhadap peranan Guru Besar dalam pelaksanaan program perkembangan staf di sekolah rendah dalam daerah Padawan, Sarawak
title_fullStr Persepsi guru-guru terhadap peranan Guru Besar dalam pelaksanaan program perkembangan staf di sekolah rendah dalam daerah Padawan, Sarawak
title_full_unstemmed Persepsi guru-guru terhadap peranan Guru Besar dalam pelaksanaan program perkembangan staf di sekolah rendah dalam daerah Padawan, Sarawak
title_sort persepsi guru-guru terhadap peranan guru besar dalam pelaksanaan program perkembangan staf di sekolah rendah dalam daerah padawan, sarawak
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department College of Arts and Sciences (CAS)
publishDate 2009
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/4858/1/s802756.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4858/2/s87193.pdf
_version_ 1747827815861977088
spelling my-uum-etd.48582022-04-21T03:43:23Z Persepsi guru-guru terhadap peranan Guru Besar dalam pelaksanaan program perkembangan staf di sekolah rendah dalam daerah Padawan, Sarawak 2009 Anthony, Nely Dali, Mohd Hasani College of Arts and Sciences (CAS) Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts and Sciences LB2801-3095 School administration and organization The main purpose of this study is to identify teacher's perception towards staff development programme at 4 primary schools in Padawan District, Sarawak. The objectives of this study are to identify the teachers' perception i.e. suitability, planning, implementation, evaluation, support, and to study teachers' needs in development programme. 100 trained teachers have been chosen as samples of this study. This study used descriptive (Percentage and mean) and inferential methods (T test, One way Anova and Pearson Correlation) to analyze the data. Research findings showed levels of implementation of staff development is high with mean suitability of the programme p=3.00 (male staff and p=38.41 female staff, whereby mean for implementation programme is p=.170, evaluation is p=.000, planning the programme is p=.000, support is p=.000, needs of the programme is p=. 000 and impact of the programme is p=. 000. The finding shows there is significant in all criteria in all criteria tested. Based on the findings, it is suggested that school management especially headmaster to plan and implement staff development programme entirely. Besides, it is also suggested that headmaster and senior assistants exposed to planning and implementation procedure of making the scheme of work of staff development programme. Also suggested, Padawan District Education Department and State Education Department to hold more in service training to help the teachers to develop their knowledge. 2009 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/4858/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/4858/1/s802756.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/4858/2/s87193.pdf text eng public http://lintas.uum.edu.my:8080/elmu/index.jsp?module=webopac-l&action=fullDisplayRetriever.jsp&szMaterialNo=0000803397 masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Abdul Shukor Abdullah. (1988). Pengetua perlu kenal pasti ciri-ciri pengetua berkesan: Berita Harian 11 Jun 1998. Abdul Shukor Abdullah. (1994). Penilaian semula situasi pengurusan sekolah. Jurnal Pengurusan Pendidikan, 4(1) 5-6: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Abdul Shukor Abdullah. (1998). Fokus Pengurusan Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Alias Baba. (1999). Statistik penyelidikan dalam pendidikan sains sosial. Bangi: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Asmah Hj. Omar. (1986). Bahasa dan alam pemikiran Melayu. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Azman Yusoff. (2000). Peranan Pengetua dalam mempertingkatkan disiplin pelajar mengikut persepsi pelajar tingkah laku di sekolah-sekolah menengah daerah Rompin, Pahang. Tesis sarjana. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Bell, L & C Day. (1991). Managing the professional development of teachers. Milton Keyn Open University Press. Blaine R, Worthen, James R. Sanders. (1987). Education evaluation; alternative approaches and practical guidelines. London, Longman. Bolam, R. (1986). Conceptualising in service, in Hopkins, D., (ed). In service training and educational development: an institutional survey. London: Croom Helm. Burke, P.J. (1987). Teacher development introduction renewal and redirection. London: The Falcon Press. Chan, S.M. (1997). Sikap guru-guru sekolah menengah di Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur terhadap kursus dalam perkhidmatan. Tesis sarjana yang tidak diterbitkan. Kota Samarahan: Universiti Malaysia Sarawak. Craft, A., (1986). Continuing Professional Development. Routledge, London. Dangel, R.F., Conrad R.J., Hopkins B.L. (1987). Follow upon in service teacher training program: can the principal do it? Journal of education research 72(2), 94-103. Duke D.L. (1993). How a staff development can rescue at risk students. Education Leadership 50(4) 28-33. Emil J. Posavac, Raymond G. Carey. (1980). Program evaluation; methods and case studies. Prentice Hall Inc. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey. Edmonds (1979). Effective school for the urban poor. Education Leadership 37(1): 15-27. Espe D.G., "Training approaches in various Europian countries-an overview," dalam Hegarty, S. (Ed). Training for Management in Schools, Winsdor: NFERNELSON for the Concil of Europe. Fielding, G.D., and Schalock, H.D., (1986). Promoting the professional development of Teachers and administrators, Eugene, OR: Centre for Educational Policy and Management, University of Oregon. Fenstermercher G.D. and Berliner. D.D. (1983) A conceptual framework for the analysis of staff development, Santa Monica: Rand Corp. Fullan, M. (1992). The teacher development and educational change. London: The Palmer Press. Good, C.V. (1995). Dictionary of Education. New York: Mc Graw Hill Company. Green, M.F. (1997). Leading and institutional change: A comparative view. Higher Education Management, 9(2): 1235-146. Griffin, G. (1993). "Introduction: The work of staff development", in Griffin, G.(ed), Staff development, Eighty-second year book of the national Society for the study of education, University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Grimm L.G. (1983). Statistics application or the behaviour sciences. New York: John Willay and Sons. Hair, J.F., Black. W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., & Tatham, R.L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. Sixth Edition. New Jersey: Perason Prentice Hall. Hair, J.F., Money, A.H., Samuel, P., & Page, My M. (2007). Research methods for business. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Hall, B. (1986). Leadership support for staff development: A school building level model, ERIC Ed 275029. Hall, G & Hord, S. (1987). Change in school: Facilitating the process. Albany Sunny Press. Hassan. (1998). Persepsi guru-guru Kemahiran Hidup terhadap kursus dalam perkhidmatan. Tinjauan di sekolah-sekolah menengah daerah Hulu Langat. Tesis yang tidak diterbitkan Universiti Putra Malaysia. Hussein Hj Ahmad. (1991). Perkembangan staff di sekolah: Bentuk dan cara Pelaksanaan: Jurnal Pengurusan Pendidikan 1(2), 2-9, Genting Highland: Institut Aminudin Baki. Hussein Mahmood. (1997). Kepimpinan dan keberkesanan sekolah. Kuala Lumpur: Kumpulan Budiman. Ibrahim Mamat. (1993). Kepimpinan sekolah dan teori untuk praktis. Kuala Lumpur: Kumpulan Budiman. Ibrahim Mamat. (1996).Rekabentuk dan pengurusan latihan: Konsep dan amalan. Kuala Lumpur. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Jaafar. (1997). Kelakuan organisasi. Edisi kedua. Kuala Lumpur: Leeds Publication. Jackson, S.L. (2006). Research methods dan statistics: A Critical Thinking Approach. USA. Thomson. Jamil Ahmad. (2001). Pemupukan budaya penyelidikan di kalangan guru di sekolah: Suatu penilaian. Tesis Dr. Falsafah. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Joyce, B. & Showers, B. (1980). Improving inservice training: the messages of research educational leadership. Korinek, L, Schmid, R. & Mc Adamns, M. (1985). Inservice types and best practices. Journal of Research and Development in Education. Lee Siew Bee. (1998). Keberkesanan pelaksanaan program perkembangan staf di sebuah sekolah menengah. Tesis Sarjana Universiti Malaya. Liberman, A., dan Miller, L., (1986). School improvement: themes and variations. "Teachers College Record". Leddy. (1985). Statistic package for the social science. Canteburry Publishing: New Zealand. Sekaran. (1992). Introduction for The Statistic. Boston Hill Enterprise: USA. Longnecker, J.G. (1981). Management: 5th Education Columbus Charles and Merill Publishing Review of The Education Research. 52(3). Mahathir Mohamad. (1992). Ucapan pelancaran gerakan budaya kerja cemerlang. November. Buletin ANM (REKOD). Internet. Laman web http://www.arkib.gov.my./calender/calbul.htm Main, A. (1985). Educational staff development. London: Briddles Ltd. Maimunah (1999). Persepsi guru tentang program perkembangan staf di sekolah. Satu kajian di beberapa buah sekolah rendah daerah Kuching Sarawak. Tesis Sarjana yang tidak diterbitkan: Universiti Malaysia Sarawak. Mary, D. Carolan (1993). Seven steps for back-to-basic training and development. Ontario: Keil Drive North, Chatham. Mc Evoy. (1987). Every Acts: Hoe principals influence on their staff: Education Leadership 44(5): 73-77. Mohd Majid Konting. (1994). Kaedah Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Mohamed Sani Ibrahim. (1979). Masalah dan penerimaan guru-guru agarna sekolah rendah Semenanjung Malaysia terhadap skim latihan perguruan dalam perkhidmatan. Tesis yang tidak diterbitkan. Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Malaya. Mohamed Sani Ibrahim (2000). Peningkatan Ilmu: Satu Tuntutan dan Satu Kemestian. Kertas kerja Seminar Peningkatan Profesionalisme Pengetua-pengetua Sekolah Menengah Seluruh Melaka. Port Dickson. Newell, C.A. (1978). Human behaviour in educational administration, Englewood Cliff. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc. Norhayati. (1997). A survey of performance development experience and future needs secondary school teachers in the Hilir Perak. Tesis Master: University of Bristol. Idrus Hj. Abdul Rahman. (1999). Persepsi guru-guru terhadap program perkembangan staf di sebuah sekolah menengah kebangsaan agama di daerah Seremban. Negeri Sembilan. Tesis Sarjana. Universiti Malaya. 0'Sullivans. F. Jones, K & Reid, K. (1998). Staff development in secondary schools. London: Hodder and Stougton. Oldroyd, D & Hall, V. (1991). Managing staff development. London: Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd. Owen, J.M. (1990). Perspective from down under in Joyce, B. (ed), School culture thoughts staff development. Alexandria. School curriculum development, America. Parington, P. and G. Brown (1997). Quality assessment, staff development and cultural change. Quality Assurance in Education 5(4): 208-217. Pedler, Mike et.al. (1993). Action Learning in Practice. Aldershot, Hants, England: Gower Publishing Company Limited. Purcell, L.O. (1987). Principals role in stafdevelopment. Laporan dalam ERIC ED 285279. Roback, T.H. (1987). Personnel research perspectives on human resource management and development. Public Perseonnel Management 18(2), 36-161. Rodriguez, S. & Johnstone, K. (1986). Stafdevelopment through a collegial support model, dlm Dillion-Peterson, B (ed), Staff development/organization. Alexandria: American School Curriculum Development. Schon, D.A. (1987). Educating in reflective practitioner: Towards a new design for teaching and learning in the proffesion. San Frasisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Sekaran, U. (2005). Research methodsfor business: a skill-building approach (ed. Ke-4). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Sergiovanni. T.J. (1991). The pricipalship reflective proactive perspective, Boston: Ally and Bacon. Sukumaran (1984). Commerce in service course in penisular Malaysia: Perception of some participants. Tesis Master yang tidak diterbitkan. Kuala Lumpur. Universiti Malaya. Spackman, F. (1991). Teachers professional responsibilities. London: David Fulton Publishers in association with the Roehampton Institute. Sahlan Surat. 2005. Persepsi guru-guru tentang peranan Guru Besar dalam pelaksanaan program perkembangan staf di sekolah: Kajian. Thompson, T.T. (1992). Developing and implementing an in service program designed to change teacher attitude towards mainstream learning. Disable student at the secondary level. Laporan penyelidikan Nova Universiti. Van Tadler, M. and Veeman, S. (1991). Characteristics of effective in service program and activities: result of a Dutch survey. Educational studies 17(1), 25-28. Veeman, S. Tudler, M.V., Vortan, M. (1994). The impact of in service training on teacher behaviour. Teaching and teacher education 10, 303-317. Wan Mohd Zahid Mohd Nordin. (1993). Wawasanpendidikan : Agendapengisian, Kuala Lumpur. Nurin Enterprise. Wolcott, H., (1977). Teacher vs Technocrats, Eugene OR: University of Oregon, Center for Educational Policy and Management. Zaidatol Akmaliah Lope Pihie. (1998). Pentadbiran pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Fajar Bakti Sdn. Bhd. Zulwali Kifli Merawi (1991). Perkernbangan staf di sekolah menengah-satu pandangan. Jurnal Penyelidikan. Sarawak.

Similar Items