Hubungan kepimpinan instruksional ketua bidang dengan amalan instruksional dalam kalangan ketua panitia

Hubungan kepimpinan instruksional ketua bidang dengan amalan instruksional dalam kalangan ketua panitia

The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between the instructional leadership of department heads and instructional practices of subject heads amongst 22 secondary schools in the district of Kota Kinabalu, Sabah. Specifically this study aims to investigate the level of instructi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Chong, Shat Muai
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
Published: 2010
Subjects:
LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/4868/1/s802622.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4868/2/s802622_abstract.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.4868
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
advisor Veloo, Arsaythamby
topic LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
spellingShingle LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
Chong, Shat Muai
Hubungan kepimpinan instruksional ketua bidang dengan amalan instruksional dalam kalangan ketua panitia
description The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between the instructional leadership of department heads and instructional practices of subject heads amongst 22 secondary schools in the district of Kota Kinabalu, Sabah. Specifically this study aims to investigate the level of instructional leadership of departments heads, the level of instructional practices of subject heads, whether there are any differences in the instructional leadership of department heads based on teaching experience, whether there are any differences in the instructional practices of subject heads based on experience as subject heads and the relationship between the instructional leadership of department heads and the instructional practices of subject heads. The respondents consisted of 273 subject heads who assessed the instructional leadership of 83 department heads. The instrument used was a questionnaire consisting of 16 items adapted from Lahui-Ako (2001) to measure the perception of subject heads on the instructional leadership of department heads and 40 items adapted from Yusof Jasmin (2007) to measure the instructional practices of subject heads. The respondents responded to the items in the questionnaire with a four-point Likert scale. Data collected was analysed using SPSS version 12.0. The results of the analysis indicated that the subject heads rated the instructional leadership of department heads as high. Results also indicated the instructional practices of subject heads as high. ANOVA analysis showed that there are no differences in the instructional leadership of department heads based on their experiences while analysis showed that there are significant differences in the instructional practices of subject heads based on their experiences as subject heads. There is significant difference in the instructional practices between the more experienced and the less experienced subject heads. The Pearson correlation showed that there is a positive relationship between the instructional leadership of department heads and the instructional practices of subject heads
format Thesis
qualification_name masters
qualification_level Master's degree
author Chong, Shat Muai
author_facet Chong, Shat Muai
author_sort Chong, Shat Muai
title Hubungan kepimpinan instruksional ketua bidang dengan amalan instruksional dalam kalangan ketua panitia
title_short Hubungan kepimpinan instruksional ketua bidang dengan amalan instruksional dalam kalangan ketua panitia
title_full Hubungan kepimpinan instruksional ketua bidang dengan amalan instruksional dalam kalangan ketua panitia
title_fullStr Hubungan kepimpinan instruksional ketua bidang dengan amalan instruksional dalam kalangan ketua panitia
title_full_unstemmed Hubungan kepimpinan instruksional ketua bidang dengan amalan instruksional dalam kalangan ketua panitia
title_sort hubungan kepimpinan instruksional ketua bidang dengan amalan instruksional dalam kalangan ketua panitia
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department College of Arts and Sciences (CAS)
publishDate 2010
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/4868/1/s802622.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4868/2/s802622_abstract.pdf
_version_ 1747827817120268288
spelling my-uum-etd.48682019-11-26T05:57:46Z Hubungan kepimpinan instruksional ketua bidang dengan amalan instruksional dalam kalangan ketua panitia 2010 Chong, Shat Muai Veloo, Arsaythamby College of Arts and Sciences (CAS) Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts and Sciences LB2801-3095 School administration and organization The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between the instructional leadership of department heads and instructional practices of subject heads amongst 22 secondary schools in the district of Kota Kinabalu, Sabah. Specifically this study aims to investigate the level of instructional leadership of departments heads, the level of instructional practices of subject heads, whether there are any differences in the instructional leadership of department heads based on teaching experience, whether there are any differences in the instructional practices of subject heads based on experience as subject heads and the relationship between the instructional leadership of department heads and the instructional practices of subject heads. The respondents consisted of 273 subject heads who assessed the instructional leadership of 83 department heads. The instrument used was a questionnaire consisting of 16 items adapted from Lahui-Ako (2001) to measure the perception of subject heads on the instructional leadership of department heads and 40 items adapted from Yusof Jasmin (2007) to measure the instructional practices of subject heads. The respondents responded to the items in the questionnaire with a four-point Likert scale. Data collected was analysed using SPSS version 12.0. The results of the analysis indicated that the subject heads rated the instructional leadership of department heads as high. Results also indicated the instructional practices of subject heads as high. ANOVA analysis showed that there are no differences in the instructional leadership of department heads based on their experiences while analysis showed that there are significant differences in the instructional practices of subject heads based on their experiences as subject heads. There is significant difference in the instructional practices between the more experienced and the less experienced subject heads. The Pearson correlation showed that there is a positive relationship between the instructional leadership of department heads and the instructional practices of subject heads 2010 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/4868/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/4868/1/s802622.pdf text eng validuser https://etd.uum.edu.my/4868/2/s802622_abstract.pdf text eng public http://sierra.uum.edu.my/record=b1258820~S1 masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Abdul Razak Abd Rahman. (2007). Satu tinjauan terhadap peranan guru-guru penolong kanan dan guru-guru kanan mata pelajaran (G4) dalam membantu meningkatkan pencapaian akademik sekolah di daerah Jasin. Jurnal Pendidikan PKPSM Kebangsaan, 107-125. Abdul Shukor Abdullah. (2004). Kepimpinan unggul tonggak pengurusan pendidikan cemerlang. Jurnal Pengurusan dan Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 14(1), 18-33. Abdul Shukur Abdullah. (1996). Membina sekolah yang berkesan: Pengurusan setempat, empowerment dan kepimpinan sebagai inisiatif polisi. Kertas yang dibentangkan dalam Seminar Ke-2 Sekolah Efektif pada Julai 1996 di Institut Aminuddin Baki, Genting Highlands. Abdullah Hassan & Ainon Mohd. (2007).Teori dan teknik kepimpinan: Panduan aplikasi di tempat kerja. Kuala Lumpur: PTS Professional. Abdullah Sani Yahaya. (2005). Mengurus sekolah. Kuala Lumpur: PTS Profesional. Alig-Mielcarek, J. M. (2003). A model of school success: Instructional leadership, academic press, and student achievement. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Ohio State University, Ohio. Amin Senin. (2005). Hubungan pengurusan pembangunan profesional sekolah dengan model pembangunan profesional guru serta pengaruh terhadap pengajaran guru di sekolah-sekolah menengah negeri Sabah. (Disertasi kedoktoran tidak diterbitkan). Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu. Aminuddin Mohd Yusof. (1994). Kepimpinan, motivasi dan prestasi model guru dan tentera. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Anderson, P. W. (2002). The managerial roles of community college chief academic officers. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Texas Technology University, Texas. Andrews, R. L., Basom, M. R., & Basom, M. (1991). Instructional leadership: Supervision that makes a difference. Theory Into Practice, 30(2), 97-101. Arbain Subki. (1998). Tingkahlaku kepimpinan pengajaran pengetua sekolah: Satu tinjauan persepsi guru-guru kanan di sekolah-sekolah menengah daerah Kluang, Johor. (Disertasi sarjana tidak diterbitkan). Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai. Arsaythamby Vello, & Anunugam Raman. (2009). Panduan menganalisis dan menginterpretasi data. Sintok: Universiti Utara Malaysia. Azizi Yahaya, Shahrin Hashim, Jamaludin Ramli, Yusof Boon, & Abdul Rahim Hamdan. (2007). Menguasai penyelidikan dalam pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: PTS Professional. Bedeian, A. G. (1986). Management. New York: The Dryden Press. Bell, L. (2003). A systematic review of the impact of school headteachers and principals on student outcomes. London: EPPI-Centre. Bliss, J. R., Firestone, W. A., Richards, C. E. (1991). Rethinking Effective Schools: Research and Practice. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs. Brophy, J. & Good, T. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research (pp. 340-370). NY: Macmillan. Bush, T., & Glover, D. (2002). School leadership: Concepts and evidence. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership. Chua, Y. P. (2006). Kaedah dan statistik penyelidikan: Asas statistik penyelidikan. Kuala Lumpur: McGraw Hill. Cosner, S., & Peterson, K. (2003). Building a learning community. Journal of Leadership, 32, 5-17. Creemers, B. (1994). The effective classroom. London: Cassell. DeBevoise, W. (1984). Synthesis of research on principal as instructional leader. Educational Leadership, 41(5), 14-21. Dinham, S., Cairney, T., Craigie, D., & Wilson, S. (1995). School climate and leadership research into three secondary schools. Journal of Educationa1 Adminstration, 33(4), 36-57. Drake, D. L., & Roe, W. H. (1986). The principalship (2nd ed.). New York: Random House. Edmonds, R. R. (1979). Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership, 37(1), 15-24. Elwood High School. (2001). Enhancing school climate. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service). Enueme, C. P. & Egwunyenga, E. J. (2008). Principals' instructional leadership roles and effect on teachers' job performances: A case study of secondary schools in Asaba Metropolis, Delta State, Nigeria. Journal of Social Science, 16(10), 13-17. Fidler, B. (1997). School leadership: Some key ideas. Journal of School Leadership and Management, 17(1), 23-37. Foster, R., & Hilaire, B. S. (2003). Leadership for school improvement: Principals' and teachers' perspectives. [Article number 3]. International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning, 7. Retrieved from http://www.ucalgary.ca/iejll/foster_sthilaire. Dicapai pada 15 Februari 2010. Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research education (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. Gay, L. R., & Airasian, P. (2003). Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application (7th ed.). New Jersey: Merrill Prentice Hall. Gray, J. (1990). The quality of schooling: Frame works for judgements. British Journal of Educational Leadership, 37, 15-27. Gurr, D. (1996). On conceptualising school leadership: Time to abandon transformation leadership? Leading and Managing, 2(3), 221-239. Gurr, D., & Drysdale, L. (2003). Successful school leadership in Victoria: Three case studies. Leading and Managing, 9(1), 18-37. Hallinger, P. (2003). Leading educational change: Reflection on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 329-351. Hallinger, P. (2005). Instructional leadership and the school principal: A passing fancy that refuses to fade away. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4, 221-239. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1996). Reassesing the principals' role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980-1995. Educational Adminstration Quarterly, 32(1), 5-44. Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. F. (1985). Assessing the instructional management behavior of principals. The Elementary School Journal, 86(2), 217-246. Harris, A. (2002). School improvement. What S in it for schools? London: Routledge Falmer. Harris, A. (2008). Distributed leadership according to the evidence. Journal of Educational Adminstration, 46(2), 172-188. Harris, A., Day, C., Hopkins, D., Hadfield, M., Hargreaves, A., & Chapman, C. (2003). Teachers' perspectives on effective school leadership. Journal Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 9(1), 67-77. Hopkins, D. (2005). Instructional leadership and school improvement. In A. Harris, C. Day, D. Hopkins, M. Hadfield, A. Hargreaves, & C. Chapman. (Eds.), Instructional leadership and school improvement (pp. 55-71). London: Routledge Falmer. House, R. J., & Mitchell R. (1974). Path-Goal theory of leadership. Journal of Contemporary Business, 3(1), 81-98. Hoy, A. W., & Hoy, W. K. (2003). Instructional leadership: a learning-centered guide. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Hoy, W., Tarter, C., & Bliss, F. (1990). School characteristics and faculty trust in secondary schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 25, 294-309. Hughes, V. M. (2006). Teacher evaluation practices and teacher job satisfaction. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Missouri-Columbia, USA. Hussein Mahmood. (2008). Kepimpinan dun keberkesanan sekolah (edisi ke-2). Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Institut Aminuddin Baki. (1995). Kajian mengenai tugas ketua bidang matapelajaran (KBMP) selaku pengurus kurikulum. Institut Aminuddin Baki, Genting Highlands. Ishak Sin. (2003). Gaya kepimpinan transformasi dan pengajaran: Gaya manakah yang diperlukan oleh pengetua? Jurnal Pengurusan dan Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 13(1), 1-16. Ismail Mustafa. (2008). Kepimpinan pendidikan: Teori dan amalan. Kuala Lumpur: Pure Honey Enterprise. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (1990). Pukal latihan kurikulum bersepadu sekolah menengah bahan sumber tambahan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2006). Pelan induk pembangunan pendidikan 2006- 2010. Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. Kotrlik, J. W., & Williams, H. A. (2003). The incorporation of effect size in information technology, learning, and performance research. Information Technology, Learning and Performance Journal, 21(1), 1-7. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 608. Krug, S. E. (1992). Instructional leadership: A constructivist perspective. Educational Adminstration Quarterly, 28(3), 430-443. Lahui-Ako, B. (2001).The instructional leadership behavior of Papua New Guinea high school principals: A provincial case study. Journal of Educational Administration, 39(3), 233-265. Lashway, L. (1995). Can instructional leaders be facilitative leaders? Clearinghouse on Educational Management. College of Education: University of Oregon. Lashway, L. (2001). Developing instructional leaders. Clearinghouse on Educational Management. College of Education: University of Oregon. Lashway, L. (2003a). Distributed leadership. Clearinghouse on Educational Policy and Management, Research Roundup, 19(4), 1-7. Lashway, L. (2003b). Role of the school leaders. Clearinghouse on Educational Management. College of Education: University of Oregon. Latip Muhammad. (2006). Pelaksanaan kepimpinan pengajaran di kalangan pengetua sekolah di negeri Selangor Darul Ehsan. (Disertasi kedoktoran tidak diterbitkan). Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi. Lee, C. N. (1991). Kepimpinan instruksi dan pencerapan pengajaran di sekolah-sekolah daerah Hulu Langat. (Disertasi sarjana tidak diterbitkan). Universiti Pertanian Malaysia, Serdang. Lee, G. V. (1991). Instructional leadership as collaborative sense-making. Journal Theory Into Practice, Spring, 30(2), 83-90. Leithwood, K. (1994). Leadership for school restructuring. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30(4), 498-518. Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., & Femandez, A. (1994). Transformational leadership and teachers' commitment to change. In J. Murphy, & K. L. Seashore (Eds.), Reshaping the principalship: Insights from transformational reform efforts (pp. 77-79). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. MacBeath, J. (2005). Leadership as distributed: a matter of practice. School Leadership and Management, 25(4), 349-366. Manukaran, G. (2003). Persepsi guru tentang peranan pengetua sebagai pemimpin pengajaran: Satu kajian di Teluk Intan Perak. (Disertasi sarjana tidak diterbitkan). Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur). Maxwell, J. C. (2002). Leadership 101 what every leader needs to know. United States: Thomas Nelson Publishers. Mazna Sulaiman. (2007). Pengaruh kepimpinan pengajaran guru kanan bidang ke atas efikasi dan komitmen guru. (Disertasi sarjana tidak diterbitkan). Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok. McEwan, E. K. (2003). 7 Steps to efective instructional leadership (2nd ed.). California: Convin Press, Inc. Mohamed Sulaiman. (1996). Kepimpinan dun pengurusan strategik untuk kecemerlangan organisasi. Siri Syarahan Perlantikan Profesor 1995/Bi1.5. Pulau Pinang: Universiti Sains Malaysia. Mohd Kassim Mohd Ibrahim. (2003). Gaya kepimpinan, kepuasan kerja dun keberkesanan pengajaran guru. (Disertasi kedoktoran tidak diterbitkan). Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu. Mohd Nor Jaafar. (2004). Kepimpinan pengajaran guru besar, komitmen dan kepuasan kerja guru: Satu kajian perbandingan dan hubungan antara sekolah berkesan dengan sekolah kurang berkesan. Jurnal Penyelidikan Pendidikan Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan, Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia, 93-120. Mohd Rosli Mohd Othman. (2000). Hubungan kepimpinan instruksional dengan iklim sekolah. (Disertasi sarjana tidak diterbitkan). Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai. Mortimore, P. (1995). Key characteristics of effective schools. Kertas yang dibentangkan dalarn Seminar Sekolah Berkesan, pada 13-14 Julai 1995, di Institut Aminuddin Baki, Genting Highlands. Mylles, J. & Frost, D. (2006). Building teacher leadership in Herfordshire. Improving Schools, 9(1), 69-76. Nasirah Muin. (2000). Kepimpinan pengajaran ke arah kecemerlangan pencapaian akademik di sekolah menengah daerah Gombak, Selangor. (Disertasi sarjana tidak diterbitkan). Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur. Nik Azis Nik Pa. (1996).Kurikulum bersepadu sekolah menengah: Agenda Tindakan. Kuaa Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Omardin Ashaari. (2002). Pengurusan sekolah suatu panduan lengkap. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publication & Distributors Sdn Bhd. Palomares, L. B., & Castillo, J. L. A. (2001).Professional profile of principalship in educational institutions in Spain. Kertas yang dibentangkan dalam Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association pada 10-14 April 2001 di Seattle, WA. Pang, V. & Lajium, D. (2005). Penilaian dalam pendidikan. Kota Kinabalu: Universiti Malaysia Sabah. Pang, V. (2005). Curiculum evaluation: An application in a smart school. Kota Kinabalu: Universiti Malaysia Sabah. Pendidik. (2008). Ucap utama Yg Bhg. Dato' Noor Rezan Bapoo Hashim, Timbalan Ketua Pengarah Pelajaran dalam Kolokium Kebangsaan Kepimpinan Instruksional 2008 pada 9-12 Jun 2008, di Institut Aminuddin Baki Cawangan Utara. Selangor: Widad Publication Sdn Bhd. Persatuan Pengetua-pengetua Sekolah Menengah Malaysia Cawangan Selangor. (2007). Panduan tugas staf sekolah menengah (edisi ke-4). Kuala Lumpur: Alpha Sigma. Quah, C. M. (2002). Kepimpinan pengajaran di kalangan pengetua sekolah menengah di daerah Kluang, Johor. (Disertasi sarjana tidak diterbitkan). Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur. Quinn, D. M. (2002). The impact of principal leadership behaviours on instructional practice and student engagement. Journal of Educational Management, 40(5), 447-467. Ramaiah, A. L. (1992). Kepimpinan pendidikan: Cabaran masa kini. Petaling Jaya: IBS Buku Sdn Bhd. Reynolds, D. (1992). School effectiveness and school improvement: An updated review of the British literature. In D. Reynolds, & P. Cuttance (Eds.), School Effectiveness Research, Policy and Practice (pp. 154-163). London: Cassell. Robbins, S. P. (2000). Gelagat organisasi (Abdul Razak Ibrahim & Ainin Sulaiman, Trans.). Kuala Lumpur: Pearson Education Asia (Original work published 1943). Rosenshine, B., & Stevens, R. (1986). Teaching functions. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 376-391). New York: Macmillan. Rosnarizah Abdul Halim & Zulkifli Abdul Manaf. (2009). Kajian explorasi distributed leadership di Malaysia. Kertas yang dibentangkan di Seminar Nasional Pengurusan dan Kepimpinan Pendidikan Ke-16, pada 19-23 Julai 2009 di Institut Aminuddin Baki, Genting Highlands. Salvin, R. (1987). A theory of school and classroom organization. Educational Phychologist, 22, 89-108. Sartawi, A., & Alghazo, E. M. (2006). Special education teachers' perceptions of factors influencing their instructional practices. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 29(2), 161-65. Sergiovanni, T. J. (2009). The principalship: A reflective practice perspective (6th ed.). New York: Allyn and Bacon. Shahril @ Charil Marzuki, Zainun Ishak, Lee, P. W., & Saedah Siraj. (1998). Pendidikan di Malaysia. Kuala Lurnpur: Utusan Publication & Distributors Sdn Bhd. Sharifah Md. Nor. (2000). Keberkesanan sekolah: Satu perspektif sosiologi. Serdang: Universiti Putra Malaysia. Sheppard, B. (1996). Exploring the transformational nature of instructional leadership. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 42(4), 325-344. Silver, H. (1994). Good schools, effective schools: Judgements and their histories. London: Cassell. Southworth, G. (2002). School leadership and management. Journal of School Leadership and Management, 22(1), 73-91. Spillane, J. P. (2001). Leaders' thinking about instructional change: Subject matter and instructional leadership. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA, April, 2001. Spillane, J. P. (2006).Distributed leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Spillane, J. P., Diamond, J., & Halverson, R. (1999). Urban school leadership for elementary science instruction: Identifying and activating resources in an undervalued school subject. Journal of Research in Schince Teaching, 38(8), 918-940. Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. D. (2004). Towards a theory of leadership practice: a distributed perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(1), 3-34. Symth, J. (1997). Is supervision more than the surveillance of instruction? In J. Glanz & R.F. Neville (Eds), Educational supervision: Perspectives, issues and controversies (pp. 286-295). Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon. Taylor, P. (2003). Educational Leadership. Article Emergency Librarian, 21(3), 1-11. Taylor, S. (2002). How school principals can model leadership to teachers. WeLEAD Online Magazine. http://www.leadingtoday.org/Onmag/2002 %2OArchives/nov02/stnov02.html. Dicapai pada 16 Februari 2010. Teitelbaum, H. (1990). Why not aprincipal teacher? Eugene, Oregon: Clearing House of Educational Management. Ubben, G. C., & Hughes, L. W. (1992). The principal: Creative leadership for effective schools (2nd ed.). Massachuesetts: Allyn and Bacon. Wan Mohd Zahid Mohd Noordin. (1993). Wawasan pendidikan agenda pengisian. Kuala Lumpur: Nurin Enterprise. Weber, J. R. (1996). Leading the instructional program. In S. C. Smith, & P. K. Piele (Eds). School leadership: Handbook for excellence (pp. 253-278). Eugene, Oregon: Clearing House of Educational Management. Widly, H., & Dimmock, C. (1993). Instructional leadership in primary and secondary school in Western Australia. Journal of Educational Adminstration, 31(2), 43-62. Wright, L. V. (1991). Instructional leadership: Looking through schoolhouse windows. Theory Into Practice, 30(2), 113-118. Yates, S. M. (2006). Elementary teachers' mathematics beliefs and teaching practices after a curriculum reform. In J. Novotna, H. Moraova, M. Kratka, N. Stehlikova (Eds.), Proceedings 3oth Conference of the International Group for the Psychlogy of Mathematics Education, Vol. 5 (pp. 433-440). Prague: PME. York-Barr, J., & Duke, K. (2004). What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship. Review ofEducationa1 Research, 74(3), 255-316. Yulk, G. L. (2001). Leadershb in organizations (5th ed.). New York: Prentice Hall Yusuf Jasmin @ Joseph Gimbad. (2007). Pengaruh kepemimpinan pengajaran guru besar dan pelaksaan tugas guru ke atas amalan pengajaran berkesan di sekolah kurang murid negeri Sabah. (Disertasi kedoktoran tidak diterbitkan). Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu. Zahiah Haris @ Harith. (2001). Penilaian guru terhadap peranan pengetua sebagai pemimpin pengajaran di beberapa buah sekolah cemerlang. (Disertasi sarjana tidak diterbitkan). Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur. Zheng, H. Y. (1997). School context, principal characteristics, and instructional leadership effectiveness: A statistical analysis. Kertas yang dibentangkan dalam Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association pada 8-12 April 2001 di New York. Zulkafli Arifin. (2000). Pengaruh kepimpinan instruhipengetua terhadap prestasi akademik pelajar: Satu tinjauan di sekolah-sekolah menengah. (Disertasi sarjana tidak diterbitkan). Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai

Similar Items