Persepsi guru-guru di daerah Serian, Sarawak terhadap proses pencerapan oleh Guru Besar di bilik darjah

The purpose of this study is to identify the teachers perception on the process of monitoring on teachers by principlals in the classroom. About 100 teachers comprises by male and female have been chosen as respondents randomly. The study also involves 8 primary school in the B category in Serian...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Akim, Jabri
Format:	Thesis
Language:	eng eng
Published:	2010
Subjects:	LB Theory and practice of education
Online Access:	https://etd.uum.edu.my/4869/1/s802705.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/4869/2/s802705_abstract.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-uum-etd.4869
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection	UUM ETD
language	eng eng
advisor	Dali, Mohd. Hasani
topic	LB Theory and practice of education
spellingShingle	LB Theory and practice of education Akim, Jabri Persepsi guru-guru di daerah Serian, Sarawak terhadap proses pencerapan oleh Guru Besar di bilik darjah
description	The purpose of this study is to identify the teachers perception on the process of monitoring on teachers by principlals in the classroom. About 100 teachers comprises by male and female have been chosen as respondents randomly. The study also involves 8 primary school in the B category in Serian District, Samarahan, Sarawak. Survey method is using questionnaire as instrument. The data collected is analyzed using SPSS 16 version. Descriptive statistics is applied which involved the use of a one way ANOVA p>0.05. The finding of the study shows most teachers are pleased and agree with the monitoring process done by the principals. Inferential finding also shows that there is no significant in the process of monitoring among teachers of different sexs, ethnics and the teaching experiences. Teachers also agree that monitoring is important to upgrage professionalism. The findings of this study also shows that teachers should undergo the concept and principles behind monitoring to upgrade ones knowledge and to build a good two way relationship between both parties
format	Thesis
qualification_name	masters
qualification_level	Master's degree
author	Akim, Jabri
author_facet	Akim, Jabri
author_sort	Akim, Jabri
title	Persepsi guru-guru di daerah Serian, Sarawak terhadap proses pencerapan oleh Guru Besar di bilik darjah
title_short	Persepsi guru-guru di daerah Serian, Sarawak terhadap proses pencerapan oleh Guru Besar di bilik darjah
title_full	Persepsi guru-guru di daerah Serian, Sarawak terhadap proses pencerapan oleh Guru Besar di bilik darjah
title_fullStr	Persepsi guru-guru di daerah Serian, Sarawak terhadap proses pencerapan oleh Guru Besar di bilik darjah
title_full_unstemmed	Persepsi guru-guru di daerah Serian, Sarawak terhadap proses pencerapan oleh Guru Besar di bilik darjah
title_sort	persepsi guru-guru di daerah serian, sarawak terhadap proses pencerapan oleh guru besar di bilik darjah
granting_institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department	College of Arts and Sciences (CAS)
publishDate	2010
url	https://etd.uum.edu.my/4869/1/s802705.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/4869/2/s802705_abstract.pdf
_version_	1747827817374023680
spelling	my-uum-etd.48692015-08-18T07:58:47Z Persepsi guru-guru di daerah Serian, Sarawak terhadap proses pencerapan oleh Guru Besar di bilik darjah 2010 Akim, Jabri Dali, Mohd. Hasani College of Arts and Sciences (CAS) Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts and Sciences LB Theory and practice of education The purpose of this study is to identify the teachers perception on the process of monitoring on teachers by principlals in the classroom. About 100 teachers comprises by male and female have been chosen as respondents randomly. The study also involves 8 primary school in the B category in Serian District, Samarahan, Sarawak. Survey method is using questionnaire as instrument. The data collected is analyzed using SPSS 16 version. Descriptive statistics is applied which involved the use of a one way ANOVA p>0.05. The finding of the study shows most teachers are pleased and agree with the monitoring process done by the principals. Inferential finding also shows that there is no significant in the process of monitoring among teachers of different sexs, ethnics and the teaching experiences. Teachers also agree that monitoring is important to upgrage professionalism. The findings of this study also shows that teachers should undergo the concept and principles behind monitoring to upgrade ones knowledge and to build a good two way relationship between both parties 2010 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/4869/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/4869/1/s802705.pdf text eng validuser https://etd.uum.edu.my/4869/2/s802705_abstract.pdf text eng public http://lintas.uum.edu.my:8080/elmu/index.jsp?module=webopac-l&action=fullDisplayRetriever.jsp&szMaterialNo=0000804106 masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Abdul Rahim Ahmad.(1987). Pencerapan pengajaran-pemelajaran. Berita Harian. 3 Mei: 10. Abdul Shukur Abdullah. (1988). Pengurusan penyeliaan dalam suasana sekolah: Isu dan Strategi. Jurnal Kementerian Pendidikan 32(71): 33-39. Acheson & Gall. (1980). Techiques in the clinical supervision of teachers. Acheson & Gall. (1992). Techiques in the clinical supervision of teachers: The preservic and in-servic application. New York: Longman. Alfonso, R.J, Firth, G&Neville, R.F. (1981). Insruction supervision ; A behavior System. Alfonso, R.J, Fifth, G&Neville, R.F (1984). The supervisory skil mix. Educational Leardership 41(7): 16-18. :Asmah Abdul Hamid .(1995). Penyeliaan dalam pengurusan organisasi pendidikan: Satu pendekatan kaunseling. Jurnal Pengurusan Pendidikan 4(2): 105-144. Cogan, M.C. (1973). Clinical supervision, Bostan: Houghton Mimi. Company. Der Linde. CH.V. (1998). Clinical supervision in the teacher evaluation: A privotal Factor in the quality management of education. Education. Vol 119(2): 328-335. Duke, T.L. (1987). School leaderships and instructional improvement. New York: Random House. Ebmeier,H.(2003). How supervision influences teacher efficacy and commitment: An investigation of a pathmodel. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision. Vol. 18(2): 110-141. Glickman, C.D. (1991). Pretending not to know what we know in education leadership. ASCD 57(11): 4-10. Goldhammer, R. Anderson, R.H & Krajewski,(l969). Clinical supervision: Special methods for supervision of teachers. New York: Rinehart & Winston. Goldhammer, R. Anderson, R.H & Krajewski.(1980). Clinical supervision: Special Methods for supervision of teachers. Ed. Ke-2.New York : Rinehart & Winston. Hallinger, P & Murphy. J.F. (1987). Assessing and develophing principal instructional leadership. Educational Leadership 45(7): 54-61. Hawa Hassan. (2001). Peranan pengetua dalam kepimpinan pengajaran. Heck, R.H. Larsen, T.J & Marcoulides, G.A. (1980). Instructional leardership and school achievement: Validation of a causal model. Education Administration Quarterly 26(2): 94-125. Holly & Miskel, C.G. (1996). Educational Administration: Theory, pactise & research. Ed.Ke-5. New York: McGraw-Hill. Ibrahim Mamat. (1993). Kepimpinan sekolah: Toeri untuk praktis. Kuala Lumpur: Kumpulan Budiman Sdn. Bhd. Ibrahim Mamat.(2001). Pengetua sekolah: Menangani isu dan cabaran kepimpinan, Kuala Lumpur: Kumpulan Budiman Sdn. Bhd. Ishak Sin. 2003. Era Globallisasi: Pendidikan Dan Cabaran. Jurnal Pengurusan Dan Kepimpinan. Jilid 13(1): 19-24. Ismail Abu Talib.(1986). Penyeliaan Sekolah: Satu Harapan. Kuala Lumpur: Bahagian Sekolah, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Jackson, P. (2001). Supervision and evaluation of classroom teachers. Part 1: An overview of the basic process. Teacher eBook. Jemaah Nazir Sekolah Persekutuan. (l993). Buku panduan pengurusan professional sekolah menengah. Selangor: Malindo Printers Sdn. Bhd. Kamarudin Hj. Kachar.(1989). Strategi pentadbiran pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Teks Publishing Sdn. Bhd. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (1987). Surat Pekeliling Ikhtisas Bil 3/1987. Kuala Lumpur: Bahagian Sekolah. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (1992). Senarai tugas pegawai perkhidmatan pendidikan: Guru Kanan Mata Pelajaran. Kuala Lumpur: Bahagian Sekolah. Lester, & Grant, (2001). Mathemtics supervision through a new lens. Education Leadership. 58(5): 60-63. Mohd. Kasim Jaafar. (1998). Penyeliaan pengajaran amalan dan fungsi dari persepsi guru. Satu kajian di sekolah menengah luar Bandar di Daerah Jelebu Negeri Sembilan. Tesisi sarjana Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Mohd. Majid Konting. (l998).Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Mohd. Yaacob B Ibrahim.(1990). Peranan pengetua sebagai penyelia pengajaran di sekolah. Tesis sarjana. Fakulti Pendidikan, Unversiti Malaya Mohd Zaki B Zakaria. (2001). Amalan pengetua sebagai pemimpin penyeliaan di sekolah dan kesannya kepada sikap guru-guru terhadap penyeliaan pengajaran. Kertas projek Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Malaya. Rahimah Hj. Ahmad. (1986). Penyelidikan Klinikal: Satu pendedahan terhadap pengajaran dan pembelajaran di sekolah. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam: 80-86. Ramaiah A.L. (1992). Penyeliaan pengajaran guru di sebuah sekolah menengah: Satu kajian tinjauan. Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Malaya. Robiah Sidin. (1994). Pendidikan di Malaysia. Cabaran untuk masa depan. Kuala Lumpur: Fajar Bakti Sdn. Bhd. Robiah Sidin. (1998). Pemikiran dalam pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Fajar Bakti Sdn. Bhd. Robiah Sidin. (2003). Teori pentadbiran pendidikan: Satu pengenalan. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Shahabudin Hashim,. Rohizani Yaakub, Mohd. Zohir Ahmad. Pedagogi Strategi Teknik Mengajar Dengan Berkesan. Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang. Sergiovanni & Starrat, R.J. (1993). Supervission: A redeflnition. Ed. Ke-5. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Persepsi guru-guru di daerah Serian, Sarawak terhadap proses pencerapan oleh Guru Besar di bilik darjah

Similar Items