Accounting students’ perception and attitudes towards cheating in Politeknik Sultan Abdul Halim Mu’adzam Shah, Jitra, Kedah
Cheating has always been a problem in academic setting at institution of higher learning. This paper reports the results of the study of accounting students who self reported on their propensity to engage in cheating behaviors. The study aims to develop a better understanding of what students percei...
محفوظ في:
المؤلف الرئيسي: | |
---|---|
التنسيق: | أطروحة |
اللغة: | eng eng |
منشور في: |
2013
|
الموضوعات: | |
الوصول للمادة أونلاين: | https://etd.uum.edu.my/5065/1/s808405.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/5065/2/s808405_abstract.pdf |
الوسوم: |
إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
|
id |
my-uum-etd.5065 |
---|---|
record_format |
uketd_dc |
institution |
Universiti Utara Malaysia |
collection |
UUM ETD |
language |
eng eng |
advisor |
Md Yusof, Mohd 'Atef |
topic |
LB Theory and practice of education LB2300 Higher Education |
spellingShingle |
LB Theory and practice of education LB2300 Higher Education Syamsyinar, Hasan Accounting students’ perception and attitudes towards cheating in Politeknik Sultan Abdul Halim Mu’adzam Shah, Jitra, Kedah |
description |
Cheating has always been a problem in academic setting at institution of higher learning. This paper reports the results of the study of accounting students who self reported on their propensity to engage in cheating behaviors. The study aims to develop a better understanding of what students perceive as cheating and to use this knowledge to help the institution increase the level of academic integrity among students. A total of 100 accounting students at Polytechnic Sultan Abdul Halim Mu’adzam Shah (POLIMAS), Jitra, Kedah participated in this study by responding to a self-report questionnaire. The results of the survey clearly reveal that students definitely make a distinction between unethical behavior and cheating. Besides that, the explanation of why students cheat is the existence of situations in which students might consider it as acceptable to cheat or situations in which students might rationalize their behavior and behave differently than their indicated responses. However, the potential consequences of shame, loss of respect by others, and
punishment are more likely to have a deterrent effects on the decision to cheat |
format |
Thesis |
qualification_name |
masters |
qualification_level |
Master's degree |
author |
Syamsyinar, Hasan |
author_facet |
Syamsyinar, Hasan |
author_sort |
Syamsyinar, Hasan |
title |
Accounting students’ perception and attitudes towards cheating in Politeknik Sultan Abdul Halim Mu’adzam Shah, Jitra, Kedah |
title_short |
Accounting students’ perception and attitudes towards cheating in Politeknik Sultan Abdul Halim Mu’adzam Shah, Jitra, Kedah |
title_full |
Accounting students’ perception and attitudes towards cheating in Politeknik Sultan Abdul Halim Mu’adzam Shah, Jitra, Kedah |
title_fullStr |
Accounting students’ perception and attitudes towards cheating in Politeknik Sultan Abdul Halim Mu’adzam Shah, Jitra, Kedah |
title_full_unstemmed |
Accounting students’ perception and attitudes towards cheating in Politeknik Sultan Abdul Halim Mu’adzam Shah, Jitra, Kedah |
title_sort |
accounting students’ perception and attitudes towards cheating in politeknik sultan abdul halim mu’adzam shah, jitra, kedah |
granting_institution |
Universiti Utara Malaysia |
granting_department |
Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business |
publishDate |
2013 |
url |
https://etd.uum.edu.my/5065/1/s808405.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/5065/2/s808405_abstract.pdf |
_version_ |
1776103664119709696 |
spelling |
my-uum-etd.50652023-02-08T01:46:59Z Accounting students’ perception and attitudes towards cheating in Politeknik Sultan Abdul Halim Mu’adzam Shah, Jitra, Kedah 2013 Syamsyinar, Hasan Md Yusof, Mohd 'Atef Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business LB Theory and practice of education LB2300 Higher Education Cheating has always been a problem in academic setting at institution of higher learning. This paper reports the results of the study of accounting students who self reported on their propensity to engage in cheating behaviors. The study aims to develop a better understanding of what students perceive as cheating and to use this knowledge to help the institution increase the level of academic integrity among students. A total of 100 accounting students at Polytechnic Sultan Abdul Halim Mu’adzam Shah (POLIMAS), Jitra, Kedah participated in this study by responding to a self-report questionnaire. The results of the survey clearly reveal that students definitely make a distinction between unethical behavior and cheating. Besides that, the explanation of why students cheat is the existence of situations in which students might consider it as acceptable to cheat or situations in which students might rationalize their behavior and behave differently than their indicated responses. However, the potential consequences of shame, loss of respect by others, and punishment are more likely to have a deterrent effects on the decision to cheat 2013 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/5065/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/5065/1/s808405.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/5065/2/s808405_abstract.pdf text eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Ameen, Elsie C., Daryl M. Guffey and Jeffrey J. McMillan (1996). “Accounting Students’ Perceptions of Questionable Academic Practices and Factors Affecting their Propensity to Cheat,” Accounting Education, v5 n3, 191-205. Baldwin, D.C. and S.R. Daugherty (1996). “Cheating in Medical School: A Survey of Second-Year Students,” Academic Medicine, v71, 267-273. Batool, S., Abbas, A. and Naeemi, Z. (2011). Cheating Behavior among Undergraduate Students. International Journal of Business and Social Science, v2, 3. Carpenter, D.D., Harding, T.S., Finelli, C.J., Montgomery, S.M. and Passow, H.J. (2006). Engineering Students’ Perceptions of and Attitudes Towards Cheating. Journal of Engineering Education, 181-194. Cizek, G. J. (1999). Cheating on tests: How to do it, detect it, and prevent it. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates, U.S.A. Davis, S. F., Grover, C. A., Becker, A. H., & McGregor, L. N. (1992). Academic dishonesty: Prevalence, determinants, techniques, and punishments. Teaching of Psychology, 19, 16–20. Dodeen, H.M. (2012). Undergraduate Student Cheating in Exams. Damascus University Journal, v28, 1. Dowd, S.B. (1992). Academic integrity—a review and case study. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED349060). Fass, R.A. (1990). “Cheating and Plagiarism in W.W.” May (ed). Ethics and Higher Education. P170-184, New York: Macmillan. Fileh, F. (1988). Cheating in exams, Alnahdah Publications, Cairo, Egypt. Feinberg, J.M. (2009). Perception of Cheaters: The Role of Past and Present Academic Achievement. Ethics & Behavior, 19(4), 310–322. IFAC (2008). IFAC Global Leadership Survey and the Accountancy Profession Summary Results, December 2. Jendrek, M. P. (1992). Students’ reactions to academic dishonesty. Journal of College Student Development, 33, 260–273. Jones, D.L.R (2011). Academic Dishonesty: Are More Students Cheating?. Business Communication Quarterly, Volume 74, Number 2, 141-150. Jordan, A. E. (2001). College student cheating: The role of motivation, perceived norms, attitudes, and knowledge of institutional policy. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 233–247. Klein, H. A., Levenburg, N.M., McKendall, M. and Mothersell, W. (2007). Cheating During the College Years: How do Business School Students Compare?. Journal of Business Ethics, 72: 197–206. Livosky, M., & Tauber, R. (1994). Views of cheating among college students and faculty. Psychology in the School, 31, 72-82. Lupton, R., & Chapman, K. (2002). Russian and Americans college students' attitudes, perceptions, and tendencies toward cheating. Educational Research, 44(1), 17-27. Maramark, S. & Barth Maline, M. (1993). Academic dishonesty among college students. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research. McCabe, Donald and Linda Klebe Trevino (1996). “What We Know About Cheating in College: Longitudinal Trends and Recent Developments,” Change, v28 n1, 28-33. McCabe, D. L., & Pavela, G. (2000). Some good news about academic integrity. Change, 33(5): 32–38. McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2001). Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 219–233. McCabe, D. L., & Pavela, G. (2005, March 11). New Honor Codes for a New Generations. Retrieved August 15, 2007, from Inside Higher Ed: http://insidehighered.com/views/2005/03/14/ pavelal. McCabe, D. L., Treviño, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2006). Academic dishonesty in graduate business programs: Prevalence, causes, and proposed action. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5, 294–305. Moffatt, M. (1990). Undergraduate cheating. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service NO. ED 334921). Newstead, S.E., Franklyn-Stokes, A., & Armstead, P. (1996). Individual differences in student cheating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 229–241. Nonis, Sarath and Cathy Owens Smith (2001). “An Examination of the Relationship between Academic Dishonesty and Workplace Dishonesty: A Multicampus Investigation,” Journal of Education for Business, November/December, 69-77. Pincus, H.S., &Schmelkin, L.P. (2003).Faculty Perception of Perceptions of Dishonest Behavior.Journal of Accounting, Ethics & Public Policy, 5, 375-393. Pulvers, K., &Diekhoff, G.M. (1999). Relationship between Academic Dishonesty and College Classroom Environment.Research in Higher Education, 40, 487-498. Sierles, F., Hendricks, I., & Circle, S. (1980). Cheating in Medical School. Journal of Medical Education, 55, 124-125. Sims, R. L.: 1993, _The Relationship between Academic Dishonesty and Unethical Business Practices_, Journal of Education for Business 68(4), 207–211. Smith, Kenneth J., Danny Ervin and Jeanette A. Davy (2003). “An Examination of the Antecedents of Cheating Among Finance Students,” Journal of Financial Education, Summer, 13-33. Swift, Cathy Owens and Sarath Nonis (1998). “When No One is Watching: Cheating Behavior on Projects and Assignments,” Marketing Education Review, v8 n1, 27-36. Takiah, M.I., Syed Mohd Ghazali Wafa, S.A.W. & S. Khundari, (2002). To be ahead and to stay ahead. Accountant National, 15(8), 15-18. Webster’s New World Dictionary, 2nd Edition, Warner Books, New York, New York, 1984. Whitley, B. E.: 1998, _Factors Associated with Cheating among College Students, Research in Higher Education 39(3), 235–274. Whitley, B. E., Jr., & Kost, C. R. (1999). College students’ perceptions of peers who cheat. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 1732–1760. |