Exploratory study of accessibility to public bus transport by disabled people in Klang Valley : A case study in RapidKL Bus Services

Klang Valley is currently has an estimated population of 6,471,028 with an area of 2804.5 square kilometers only. Taking into the account on the estimation made by the World Health Organisation (WHO), 15% of the world's populations are people with some form of disability. Hence the number of di...

全面介绍

Saved in:
书目详细资料
主要作者: Azliza, Saad
格式: Thesis
语言:eng
eng
出版: 2013
主题:
在线阅读:https://etd.uum.edu.my/5151/1/s809116.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/5151/2/s809116_abstract.pdf
标签: 添加标签
没有标签, 成为第一个标记此记录!
id my-uum-etd.5151
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
advisor Abdul Aziz, Fadzli Shah
topic HV Social Pathology
Social and Public Welfare
spellingShingle HV Social Pathology
Social and Public Welfare
Azliza, Saad
Exploratory study of accessibility to public bus transport by disabled people in Klang Valley : A case study in RapidKL Bus Services
description Klang Valley is currently has an estimated population of 6,471,028 with an area of 2804.5 square kilometers only. Taking into the account on the estimation made by the World Health Organisation (WHO), 15% of the world's populations are people with some form of disability. Hence the number of disabled people around Kelang Valley is estimated about 970,000. However, statistics released by the Jabatan Pembangunan Orang Kurang Upaya, until May 2012 there were only 87.927 people registered disabled in Selangor and Kuala Lumpur. Numbers of private cars in the Klang Valley until May 2012 were estimated at 5,971,259 units. This gives us the impression that the situation in the Klang Valley is quite crowded with people and vehicles, particularly private vehicles. RapidKL is one of the bus operators that were responsible to provide public bus services in the Klang Valley. In line with the government's goals to improve public transport in the Klang Valley to be the people's choice of transport, RapidKL has taken the initiative to provide disabled-friendly public buses. This began with the purchase of 100 units of disabled-friendly buses in 2007 which started the operations in June of the same year. On top of that, RapidKL also had repair the bus stop and related infrastructure facilities of the public bus system in the main route to be accessible by disabled people (Bernama, 2007). Even so, there are still complaints from disabled people that the facilities provided to them has not disabled-friendly. They still faced the difficulties to access to public bus services and others public places. This study was done to see to which extent the disabled people are able to access to the RapidKL pulic bus services and trying to identify the barriers faced by them. This study uses qualitative method and total sample randomly selected interviewed was 47 respondents. The interview then has been transcribed word by word for the analysis purposes. The results showed that all respondents have access to RapidKL public bus services but with hardship. Apart from that, the results from this study are also shows that there are some barriers that they have to face when they are accessing to the public bus system. With the availability of Person with Disabilities Act 2008 and the drastic measures taken by the government to improve the level of access to public transport, it has become a stepping stone in providing a comprehensive accessibility to public bus services for disabled people
format Thesis
qualification_name masters
qualification_level Master's degree
author Azliza, Saad
author_facet Azliza, Saad
author_sort Azliza, Saad
title Exploratory study of accessibility to public bus transport by disabled people in Klang Valley : A case study in RapidKL Bus Services
title_short Exploratory study of accessibility to public bus transport by disabled people in Klang Valley : A case study in RapidKL Bus Services
title_full Exploratory study of accessibility to public bus transport by disabled people in Klang Valley : A case study in RapidKL Bus Services
title_fullStr Exploratory study of accessibility to public bus transport by disabled people in Klang Valley : A case study in RapidKL Bus Services
title_full_unstemmed Exploratory study of accessibility to public bus transport by disabled people in Klang Valley : A case study in RapidKL Bus Services
title_sort exploratory study of accessibility to public bus transport by disabled people in klang valley : a case study in rapidkl bus services
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business
publishDate 2013
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/5151/1/s809116.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/5151/2/s809116_abstract.pdf
_version_ 1776103668556234752
spelling my-uum-etd.51512022-11-27T06:59:00Z Exploratory study of accessibility to public bus transport by disabled people in Klang Valley : A case study in RapidKL Bus Services 2013 Azliza, Saad Abdul Aziz, Fadzli Shah Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business HV Social Pathology. Social and Public Welfare Klang Valley is currently has an estimated population of 6,471,028 with an area of 2804.5 square kilometers only. Taking into the account on the estimation made by the World Health Organisation (WHO), 15% of the world's populations are people with some form of disability. Hence the number of disabled people around Kelang Valley is estimated about 970,000. However, statistics released by the Jabatan Pembangunan Orang Kurang Upaya, until May 2012 there were only 87.927 people registered disabled in Selangor and Kuala Lumpur. Numbers of private cars in the Klang Valley until May 2012 were estimated at 5,971,259 units. This gives us the impression that the situation in the Klang Valley is quite crowded with people and vehicles, particularly private vehicles. RapidKL is one of the bus operators that were responsible to provide public bus services in the Klang Valley. In line with the government's goals to improve public transport in the Klang Valley to be the people's choice of transport, RapidKL has taken the initiative to provide disabled-friendly public buses. This began with the purchase of 100 units of disabled-friendly buses in 2007 which started the operations in June of the same year. On top of that, RapidKL also had repair the bus stop and related infrastructure facilities of the public bus system in the main route to be accessible by disabled people (Bernama, 2007). Even so, there are still complaints from disabled people that the facilities provided to them has not disabled-friendly. They still faced the difficulties to access to public bus services and others public places. This study was done to see to which extent the disabled people are able to access to the RapidKL pulic bus services and trying to identify the barriers faced by them. This study uses qualitative method and total sample randomly selected interviewed was 47 respondents. The interview then has been transcribed word by word for the analysis purposes. The results showed that all respondents have access to RapidKL public bus services but with hardship. Apart from that, the results from this study are also shows that there are some barriers that they have to face when they are accessing to the public bus system. With the availability of Person with Disabilities Act 2008 and the drastic measures taken by the government to improve the level of access to public transport, it has become a stepping stone in providing a comprehensive accessibility to public bus services for disabled people 2013 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/5151/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/5151/1/s809116.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/5151/2/s809116_abstract.pdf text eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Abdalla Nurdeen Kamba, Riza Atiq O.K Rahmat, Amuruddin Ismail (2007). Why Do People Use Their Cars: A Case Study in Malaysia, Journal of Social Science 3(3): 117-122, 2007. Aida Hafifah Mohd Tahir and Maimunah Ismail (2007), Cross-cultural Challenges and Adjustment of Expatriates: A Case Study in Malaysia, Alternatives Turkish Journal of International Relations, 6 (3&4): 72-99. Ali Hussein Hsan Sabeen, Ahmed Elmugtaba Anwar, Zainura Z. Noor (2012), Sustainable Public Transportation in Malaysia. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT ISSN: 2249–8958, Volume-1, Issue-5, June 2012. Alnis, R. and D. Henser, 2003. The Mobility and accessibility expectations of seniors in an aging population. Transport Research Part A 37 (10): 903-916. Doi:10.1016/S0965-8564(03)00073-9. Audit Commission (1999) A Life's Work: local authorities, economic development and economic regeneration, Audit Commission, London. B. Olufemi Odufuwa, 2007. Towards Sustainable Public Transport for Disabled People in Nigerian Cities, Stud. Home Comm. Sci., 1(2): 93-100 (2007). Banister, D. and A. Bowling (2004). "Quality of life for the elderly: the transport dimension. “Transport Policy 11: 105-115. Baum F (2000) The New Public Health. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Berita harian (2011) Pengangkutan Awam Lebih Selesa 2012 Retrieved on 23th April 2012. www.bharian.com.my/bharian/articles. Berita Harian (2012) Rintihan OKU. Retrieved on 12th October 2012. www.bharian.com.my/family. BERNAMA (2007). RapidKL Perkenal 100 Bas Mesra OKU Mulai Jun. Retrieved on 23rd April 2012. www.kpdnk.bernama.com.my. Berg, B.L (1998). Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences (3rd ed). Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Bowling, A. and Gabriel, 2004. Quality of life from the perspectives of older people International Journal of Aging and Society, 24: 675–691. Campbell, J and Oliver, M. (1996) Disability politics, London, Rutledge CEMT,2004. Improving Accessibility of Transport, Implementation at the National Level of Measure to Improve Accessibility. Conclusion and Recommendation. Technical Report CEMT/CM(2004)13. European Conference of Minsters of Transport Council of Ministers. www.internationaltransportforum.org/europe/ecmt. Caroline Law & David Ewens (2011). Making the Journey: Travelling to adult learning for people experiencing mental health difficulties. The National Institute of Adult Continuing Education, England and Wales. Che Rosmani Che Hassan, Mahar Diana Hamid, Norazlin Dzulkifly and Norazlina Mahmood (2009). Hazards Identification at Bus Interchanges in Kuala Lumpur, Journal of Engineering and Technology, Vol. 4, No. 1: 47-56, 2009. Cristi Harris (2009), National Transportation Access Research Project “ A Survey of Riders with Disability; Transit Access Project by Meeting the Challenge, Inc. Department of Standards Malaysia (2003) Code of practice for access of disabled persons outside buildings (first revision) Malaysian Standard 1331:2003, Department of Standards Malaysia, Putrajaya. European Conference of Minister of Transport (2006) Improving transport for people with mobility handicaps. European Conference of Ministers of Transport, OECD Publications Service, Paris. Fairuzzana Ahmad Padzi and Fuziah Ibrahim (2012). Accessibility of Visual Impaired Passengers at Urban Railway Stations in the Klang Valley, International Transaction Journal of engineering, Management & Applied Science Technologies, Vol. 3 No. 3. Gallon C A (2000): Disabled People and their Use of Transport:The relative importance of different factors and their implications for policy. PhD Thesis. London: Cranfield University. Gerakkan Bersama Kebangkitan OKU (2012). Memorandum Bangkit 2012. Retrieved on 22nd November 2012 www.malaysianbar.org.my. Global Accessibility (2011). Prasarana Introduces Accessible Buses People with Disabiities in Kuala Lumpur. Retrieved on 23th April 2012. www.globalaccessibilitynews.com. Hasnah Toran, Tajul Arifin Muhamad, Mohd Hanafi Mohd Yasin, Mohd Mokhatar Tahar and Nur Hazwani Hamzah (2010) : Pengetahuan Dan Sikap Rakan Sebaya Terhadap Pelajar Kurang Upaya di Sebuah IPTA Di Malaysia, AJLTHE Vol.2, No. 2, July 2010, 21-23. International Labour Organisation (2009) What We Do. Retrieved on 2th October 012, www.ilo.org/whatwedo/publications. Jabatan Perancangan Bandar dan Desa (2011) Garis Panduan Perancangan Reka Bentuk Sejagat (Universal Design). GP015-A, Jabatan Perancangan Bandar dan Desa Semenanjung Malaysia. Kementerian Perumahan dan Kerajaan Tempatan, Kuala Lumpur. Jabatan Kerja Raya (1997) Basic guidelines on pedestrian facilities Nota Teknik Jalan 18/97, Public Works Department Jasa Kepada Rakyat, Kuala Lumpur. John J. Heldrich Center, Kessler Foundation (2012) Disability and Works – Research Brief, New Jersey. Retrieved on 29th September 2012. www.discoverabilitynj.org. Kaplan, D.J With and M. Steyaert (1992). Telecommunication and Persons with Disabilities: Laying the Foundation. A Report of the first Year of the Blue Ribbon Panel on National Telecommunications Policy, U.S.A. Kuala Lumpur City Hall (2011). Kuala Lumpur Structure Plan.2020. Dewan Bandaraya Kuala Lumpur. Konsumer Kini (2010). Masalah Pengangkutan Awam di Kalangan Orang Kurang Upaya OKU. Retrieved on 23rd April 2012. www.konsumerkini.net.my. Konsumer Kini (2010). Pengangkutan Awam Perlu Sedia Kemudahan Akses OKU. Retrived on 23rd April 2012. www.konsumerkini.net.my. Lau Too Kya and Zainuddin Awang (1999), Statistik Asas ITM, Penerbitan Fajar Bakti Sdn Bhd, Kuala Lumpur. Lavery I, Knox J and Slevin E. (1997). ‘Learning disabled people - the forgotten passengers?’. Public Transport Planning and Operations, 416, 141-152. Laws of Malaysia (2008). Persons with Disabilities Act 2008, Percetakan Nasional Berhad, Kuala Lumpur. Laws of Malaysia (2012), Building, Drainage and Road Act 1974, Percetakkan Nasional Berhad, Kuala Lumpur. Ling Suen S and Mitchell C G B (1998a). Accessible Transportation and Mobility. Marina, N. (2006). Penglibatan perunding binaan dalam perancangan dan rekabentuk kemudahan dan bangunan untuk Orang Kurang Upaya (OKU). Thesis Sarjana Muda. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur. Martin N Marshal (1996), Sampling for qualitative research. Family Practice, Oxfors University Press 1996; 13: 522-525. Maynard, A. 2008. Can measuring the benefits of accessible transport enable a seamless journey, Originally published in Journal of Transport and Land Use 2 (2) (Spring 2009) pp. 21-30, http://jltu.org. Meriam, S.B (1998), Qualitatice Research and Case Study Applications in Education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers. Miles M, Huberman A (1994) An Expanded Source Book: Qualitative Data Analysis. (2nd ed.). London: Sage. Mitchell C G B (1995). ‘Definitions of accessibility’. 7th International Conference on Transport and Mobility for Elderly and Disabled People. Conference Proceedings, Vol 1, 17-20. Mitchell, Christopher Wee and Judy (2010). Improving Accessibility in Penang State, Malaysia, Hong Kong Society for Rehabilitation. Morris, J. (1991), Pride Against Prejudice: Transforming Attitudes to Disability, London: The Women Press. Mohammad Faizal Che Yusof (2011) Akta Orang Kurang Upaya 2008, Harapan dan Realiti: Satu Pendekatan Praktikal, Praxis, The Malaysian Bar Council, July 2011. Oliver, M (1996), Understanding Disability: from Theory to Practice, Basingstoke, Macmillan. Oliver, M. and Barnes, C. (1998) Disabled People and Social Policy: From Exclusion to Inclusion, London, Longman. ONS (2002) Household Average Income Report: summary www.dwp.gov.uk. Oxley, P R (2002). Inclusive Mobility: a guide to best practice on access to pedestrian and transport infrastructure. London: Department for Transport. Paper A1E09 (2003). Committee on Accessible Transportation and Mobility. Transportation Development Centre: Transport Canada. Patton M (1990) Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. London: Sage. Peter Tan (2012) www.petertan.com/blog/2012. PEMANDU (2010) Economic Transformation Program Retrieved on 24th November 2012. etp.pemandu.gov.my. Passenger Transport Executive Group (2010) Transport & Social Exclusion: Have we made the connections in our city?. Retrieved on 23rd January 2012. www.Passenger Transport Executive Group.net/Publication/Reports.htm. Porter, A (2002). Compromise and Constraint: Examining the Nature of Transport Disability in the Context of Local Travel. World Transport Policy and Practice, 8(2):9-6 Rozmi Ismail, Mohammad Hesam Hafezi, Rahim Mohd Nor and Kamaruddin Ambak (2012). Passengers Prefereance and Satisfaction of Public Transport in Malaysia, Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Science, 6(8): 410-416, 2012. Translink (2012). Public Transport Infrastructure Manual Queensland Government, Australia. Thomas Wagener and Stefan van der Spek (2006), Accessibility for all – eliminating barriers across Europe. NovaTerra Connected Cities, pp 14-17. Putnam M. (2002) Linking Aging Theory and Disability Models: Increasing the potential to Explore Aging with Physical Impairment, Gerontologist, 42(6): 799-806. Rafael Lindqvist and Jörgen Lundälv (2012). Participation in Work Life and Access to Public Transport – Lived Experiences of People with Disabilities in Sweden. The Australian Journal of Rehabilitation Counselling, 18, pp 148-155. RapidKL (2011). Azam Shahril untuk Transformasi Pengangkutan Awam. Retrived on 23rd April 2012. www.my.rapid.com.my. RapidKL (2012) Prasarana Takes Public Transport to New Heights. Retrieved on 06th June 2012. www.my.rapid.com.my. Rubinstein R (1994) Proposal writing. In: Gubrium J., Sankar A (Eds) Qualitative Methods in Aging Research. London: Sage, 67-81. Rohana Kamaruddin, Ismail Osman & Che Anizaliana Che Pei (2012).Customer Expectations and its Relationship Towards Public Transport in Klang Valley, Faculty of Business Management, Shah Alam, UiTM, 2012. S.B Thomson (2011). Sample Size and Grounded Theory, Journal of Administration and Governance (JOAAG), Vol.5. No.1. Sohail M, D Mitlin and D A C Maunder (2003) Partnerships to improve access and quality of public transport: Guidelines. Water, Engineering and Development Centre, Loughborough University, Loughborough Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1998). Basic of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Suruhanjaya Perkhidmatan Awam Darat (2012),Disabled people. Retrieved on 24th November 2012. www.spa.gov.my. SPAD (2012). National Land Public Transport Master Plan Final Draft 27 September 2012. Retrieved on 10th October 2012. www.spad.com.ny/download. SPN/TOPSS England, (2002). New Network to Promote’ Social Model’ Of Mental Health, News Release,14 February, Social Perspectives Network/Training Organization for Personal Social Services(England) (TOPSS). Taylor J and Lavery I (1998). ‘Evaluating community transport in an urban area – theory and practice’. 8th International Conference on Transport and Mobility for Elderly and Disabled People. Conference Proceedings, Vol 1, 61-70. Transport for London (2010) Exploring the Journey Experiences of Disabled Commuters. Retrieved on 23rd April 2012. www.Transport for London.gov.uk. The Star (2011) RapidKL Adds 150 Buses with Improved Features. Retrieved on October 17, 2012. www.thestar.com.my. Thomas Wagener (2006), Accessibility for all - Eliminating Barriers Across Europe. Nova Terra Connected City TRANSED, 2007. Transed the international conference on mobility and transport for elderly and disable persons. URL http://www.tc.gc.ca/Transed2007/. UITP (2008) Public Transport. Retrieved on 11th November 2012. www.uitp.org. UK Age London (2011), Greater London Forum for Older People and Transport for All Retrieved on 05th May 2012. www.ukagelondon.co.uk. Uma Sekaran and Roger Bougie (2009), Research Methods for Business, A Skill Building Approach, 5th Edition, United Kingdom, Wiley United Nation Development Program (2010), Review of International Best Practise in accessible Public Transportation for Disabled people. Retrieved on 5th July 2012. www.undp.org.my. Utusan Malaysia (2011), Prasarana Termasuk Pengangkutan Awam Perlu Mesra OKU. Retrieved on 7th January 2013. www.utusan.com.my/info. Victorian Council of Social Service (2011) Creating Accessible Journeys. Retrieved on 22nd September 2012. www. Victorian Council of Social Service.org.au. World Health Organization (2011). World Report on Disability 2011, Malta. Jayamaran. K, Jacylin Choong Shiau Suan and Soh Keng Lin (2011), Robust models for the utilization of public bus transport services in Malaysia, African Journal of Business Management, Vol.5(26), 10586-10600, October 2011. www.malaysianstatisticdeparment.gov.my. www.mot.gov.my. www.oxford onlinedictionaries.com.