Corporate governance and audit lag in Nigerian quoted companies

Unnecessary audit lag or delay decreases the quality or superiority of the financial report by not allowing investors and stakeholders to have appropriate information about their investment. The audited Financial Statements are important instrument for decision making purposes. However, before it ca...

全面介绍

Saved in:
书目详细资料
主要作者: Beri, Mohammed Haliru
格式: Thesis
语言:eng
eng
出版: 2015
主题:
在线阅读:https://etd.uum.edu.my/5228/1/s816081.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/5228/2/s816081_abstract.pdf
标签: 添加标签
没有标签, 成为第一个标记此记录!
id my-uum-etd.5228
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
advisor Abidin, Shamharir
topic HF5601-5689 Accounting
spellingShingle HF5601-5689 Accounting
Beri, Mohammed Haliru
Corporate governance and audit lag in Nigerian quoted companies
description Unnecessary audit lag or delay decreases the quality or superiority of the financial report by not allowing investors and stakeholders to have appropriate information about their investment. The audited Financial Statements are important instrument for decision making purposes. However, before it can be released to the public, it must be examined by the auditor. Thus, the speed of Financial Statements production is subject to the completion of audit work. The purpose of this study is to investigate the audit lag (i.e. time taken to complete the audit work) of Nigerian quoted companies, as listed on the Nigerian Stock Exchange for the period of 2012 to 2013. The examination was conducted on a pooled sample of 266 firm-years across ten industries. Data collected was analysed by the regression method and the results from the analysis show that, on average, Nigerian auditors spend 132 days to complete the audit work. The time taken is more than the time allowed for the submission of the annual return to the Nigerian Stock Exchange, i.e. 120 days. Firm size, leverage and profitability were established to be significant in explaining the audit lag. It is argued that bigger companies, in order to maintain investors’ confidence, would make their Financial Statements ready for audit earlier than smaller companies. In addition, since these companies also have better internal control, it is relative easier for their auditors to complete the audit field work. However, companies with more leverage and profitably were found to subject to longer audit work. This is perhaps due to auditors’ doubtful about the reported accounts since fraudulent reporting is not unusual in Nigeria. The following recommendations are suggested. The release of businesses’ financial report ought to be done appropriately, hence that will enable the shareholders to make the right investments decision. The supervisory agencies (e.g. SEC, NSE, CAMA) should formulate a strict and rigid polices that will force the companies to comply with the timely release of audited accounts
format Thesis
qualification_name masters
qualification_level Master's degree
author Beri, Mohammed Haliru
author_facet Beri, Mohammed Haliru
author_sort Beri, Mohammed Haliru
title Corporate governance and audit lag in Nigerian quoted companies
title_short Corporate governance and audit lag in Nigerian quoted companies
title_full Corporate governance and audit lag in Nigerian quoted companies
title_fullStr Corporate governance and audit lag in Nigerian quoted companies
title_full_unstemmed Corporate governance and audit lag in Nigerian quoted companies
title_sort corporate governance and audit lag in nigerian quoted companies
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business
publishDate 2015
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/5228/1/s816081.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/5228/2/s816081_abstract.pdf
_version_ 1747827888895295488
spelling my-uum-etd.52282021-03-18T06:33:12Z Corporate governance and audit lag in Nigerian quoted companies 2015 Beri, Mohammed Haliru Abidin, Shamharir Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business HF5601-5689 Accounting Unnecessary audit lag or delay decreases the quality or superiority of the financial report by not allowing investors and stakeholders to have appropriate information about their investment. The audited Financial Statements are important instrument for decision making purposes. However, before it can be released to the public, it must be examined by the auditor. Thus, the speed of Financial Statements production is subject to the completion of audit work. The purpose of this study is to investigate the audit lag (i.e. time taken to complete the audit work) of Nigerian quoted companies, as listed on the Nigerian Stock Exchange for the period of 2012 to 2013. The examination was conducted on a pooled sample of 266 firm-years across ten industries. Data collected was analysed by the regression method and the results from the analysis show that, on average, Nigerian auditors spend 132 days to complete the audit work. The time taken is more than the time allowed for the submission of the annual return to the Nigerian Stock Exchange, i.e. 120 days. Firm size, leverage and profitability were established to be significant in explaining the audit lag. It is argued that bigger companies, in order to maintain investors’ confidence, would make their Financial Statements ready for audit earlier than smaller companies. In addition, since these companies also have better internal control, it is relative easier for their auditors to complete the audit field work. However, companies with more leverage and profitably were found to subject to longer audit work. This is perhaps due to auditors’ doubtful about the reported accounts since fraudulent reporting is not unusual in Nigeria. The following recommendations are suggested. The release of businesses’ financial report ought to be done appropriately, hence that will enable the shareholders to make the right investments decision. The supervisory agencies (e.g. SEC, NSE, CAMA) should formulate a strict and rigid polices that will force the companies to comply with the timely release of audited accounts 2015 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/5228/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/5228/1/s816081.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/5228/2/s816081_abstract.pdf text eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Abdel-Meguid, A. M., Ahmed, A. S., & Duellman, S. (2013). Auditor independence, corporate governance and aggressive financial reporting: An empirical analysis. Journal of Management and Governance, 17, 283–307. Abd-Elsalam, O. H., & El-Masry, A. (2008). The Impact of Board Independence and Ownership Structure on the Timeliness of Corporate Internet Reporting of Irish-Listed Companies. Emerald Insight, 34(12), 848–867. Abdelsalam, O. H., & Street, D. L. (2007). Corporate Governance and the Timeliness of Corporate Internet Reporting by U.K. Listed Companies. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 16, 111–130. Abdul Hamid, F. Z., Shafie, R., Othman, Z., Wan Hussin, W. N., & Fadzil, F. H. (2013). Cooking the Books : The Case of Malaysian Listed Companies. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(13), 179–186. Abernathy, J. L., Beyer, B., Masli, A., & Stefaniak, C. (2014). Advances In Accounting, Incorporating Advances in International Accounting the Association Between Characteristics of Audit Committee Accounting Experts, Audit Committee Chairs , and Financial Reporting Timeliness. International Journal of Cardiology, 30(2), 283–297. doi:10.1016/j.adiac.2014.09.001. Abidin, S., & Ahmad-Zaluki, N. a. (2012). Auditor Industry Specialism and Reporting Timeliness. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 65(ICIBSoS), 873–878. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.213. Abu, N., & Arshad, R. (2014). Governance And Financial Reporting Practices : Assessment of FATF and APG Guidelines on Malaysian Companies Limited by Guarantee. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 145, 254–265. Adegbite, E. (2014). Good corporate governance in Nigeria: Antecedents, propositions. International Business Review, 0.8(004), 1–12. Ainul, W., Wan, A., Razali, M., & Arshad, R. (2014). Disclosure of Corporate Governance Structure and the Likelihood Of Fraudulent Financial Reporting. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 145, 243–253. Akle, Y. H. (2011a). the Relationship Between Corporate Governance and Financial Reporting Timeliness for Companies Listed on Egyptian Stock Exchange “an Empirical Study”. Internal Auditing & Risk Management, 6(2), 81–90. Akle, Y. H. (2011b). the Relationship Between Financial Reporting Timeliness and Attributes of Companies Listed on Egyptian Stock Exchange “an Empirical Study.”. Internal Auditing & Risk Management, 6(2), 83–103. Alhaji, I., & Aca, S. (2012). In Corporate Governance and Financial Reporting Quality in Nigerian Oil Marketing Industry Annual AFRA Conference, Makurdi Benue State. (Vol. 12, pp. 1–19). Alhazaimeh, A., Palaniappan, R., & Almsafir, M. (2014). The Impact of Corporate Governance and Ownership Structure on Voluntary Disclosure in Annual Reports among Listed Jordanian Companies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 129, 341–348. Alkhatib, K., & Marji, Q. (2012). Audit Reports Timeliness: Empirical Evidence from Jordan. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 62, 1342–1349. Kabiru Isa Dandago Nur Isdawani Binti Hassan (2013). Decision Usefulness Approach To Financial Reporting : A Case For Malaysian Inland Revenue Board. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 3(6), 772–784. Austine, O. E. (2014). Audit Firm Rotation and Audit Report Lag in Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Business and Management (IOSR-JBM), 12(4), 13–19. Azubike, J. U. . (2014). Corporate Governance and Audit Delay in Nigerian Quoted Companies. European Journal of Accounting and Finance Research, 2(10), 22–33. Balasubramanian, N. (2013). Gender Equality, Inclusivity and Corporate Governance in India. Journal of Human Values, 19(2010), 15–28. Banimahd, B., Moradzadehfard, M., & Zeynali, M. (2012). Audit Report Lag and Auditor Change : Evidence from Iran. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 2(12), 12278–12282. Botti, L., Boubaker, S., Hamrouni, A., & Solonandrasana, B. (2014). Corporate governance efficiency and internet financial reporting quality. Review of Accounting and Finance, 13, 43–64. Campus, M., Abdelrazik, M., & Devl, T. (2013). The Association between Corporate Governance and Corporate Disclosure: A Critical Review, 3(3), 94–107. Cao, Y., Myers, L. a., & Omer, T. C. (2012). Does Company Reputation Matter for Financial Reporting Quality? Evidence from Restatements. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(3), 956–990. Chalaki, P., Didar, H., & Riahinezhad, M. (2012). Corporate Governance Attributes and Financial Reporting Quality: Empirical Evidence from Iran. Ijbssnet.Com, Journals/Vol_3_No_15_. Chang, Y.-K., Chou, R. K., & Huang, T.-H. (2014). Corporate governance and the dynamics of capital structure: New evidence. Journal of Banking & Finance, 48, 374–385. Chen, G., Firth, M., Gao, D. N., & Rui, O. M. (2006). Ownership structure, corporate governance, and fraud: Evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12, 424–448. Clatworthy, M. a. (2010). Timeliness of Financial Reporting ? Evidence from UK Private Companies”. Accounting & Management Control, amphi 15(14-16), 0–16. Dabor, E. L., & Adeyemi, B. S. (2009). Corporate Governance and the Credibility of Financial Statements in Nigeria. Journal of Business Systems, Governance and Ethics, 4(1), 13–24. Danis, A., Rettl, D. a., & Whited, T. M. (2014). Refinancing, profitability, and capital structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 114(3), 424–443. Dechow, P., Ge, W., & Schrand, C. (2010). Understanding earnings quality : A review of the proxies, their determinants and their consequences $. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2-3), 344–401. Dinapoli, T. P. (2007). Standards for Internal Control in New York State Government, (October). Fagbemi, T. O., & Uadiale, O. M. (2011). An appraisal of the determinants of timeliness of audit report in Nigeria: Evidence from selected quoted companies. New Orleans International Academic Conference 2011, 355–372. Gajevszky Andra. (2015). Assessing Financial Reporting Quality : Evidence from Romania. Audit Financier, 1(1), 69–80. Habib, A., & Bhuiyan, M. B. U. (2011). Audit firm industry specialization and the audit report lag. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 20(1), 32–44. Hajiha, Z., & Rafiee, A. (2011). The Impact of Internal Audit Function Quality on Audit Delays 1. Middle-East Journal Science Resource, 10(3), 389–397. Hanlon, M., Hoopes, J. L., & Shroff, N. (2014). The Effect of Tax Authority Monitoring and Enforcement on Financial Reporting Quality. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 36(2), 137–170. Hassan, S. U., & Bello, A. (2013). Firm Characteristics And Financial Reporting Quality Of Listed. International Journal of Accounting, Banking and Management, 1(6), 47–63. Haw, I. (2000). Timeliness of Annual Report Releases and Market Reaction to Earnings Announcements in an Emerging Capital Market : The Case of China. Journal of International Financial Management and Accouting, 11(2), 108–131. Ibadin, I. M. (2012). the Association Between Selected Corporate Governance Attributes, Company Attributes and Timeliness of Financial Reporting in Nigeria, Journal of Accounting and Finance 3(9), 137–145. Ika, S. R., & Ghazali, N. a. M. (2012). Audit committee effectiveness and timeliness of reporting: Indonesian evidence. Managerial Auditing Journal, 27, 403–424. Ismail, A. M., Armstrong, A., & Clark, C. (2010).Corporate Governance Dilemma-Evidence From Malaysia. Journal of Corporate Governance, 1–16. Ismail, H., Mustapha, M., & Ming, C. O. (2012). Timeliness of Audited Financial Reports of Malaysian Listed Companies. International Journal of Business and Social Science Vol. 3 No. 22 [Special Issue – November 2012], 3(22), pp. 242–247. Janggu, T., Darus, F., Mohamed, M., & Sawani, Y. (2014). Does good corporate governance lead to better sustainability reporting ? an analysis using structural equation modeling. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 145, 138–145. Kelton, A. S., & Yang, Y. (2008). The impact of corporate governance on Internet financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 27, 62–87. Kelton, A., & Yang, Y. (2008). The impact of corporate governance on Internet financial reporting. Journal of Accounting & Public Policy, 27, 62–87. Klai, N., & Omri, A. (2011). Corporate Governance and Financial Reporting Quality: The Case of Tunisian Firms. International Business Research, 4(1), 158–166. Krishnan, L. (2011). Legal issues on the scandals involving auditors. Context, 1965, 1315–1329. Kurawa, J. M., & Kabara, A. S. (2014). Impact of Corporate Governance on Voluntary Disclosure by Firms in the Downstream Sector of the Nigerian Petroleum Industry. Proceedings of World Business Research Conference, (April), 1–19. Lai, J. H., & Chen, L. Y. (2014). The valuation effect of corporate governance on stakeholder wealth: Evidence from strategic alliances. International Review of Economics and Finance, 32(56), 117–131. Lee, H. Y., & Jahng, G. J. (2008). Determinants of audit report lag: Evidence from Korea - An examination of auditor-related factors. Journal of Applied Business Research, 24(2), 27–44. Lindahl, F., & Schadéwitz, H. (2013). Are legal families related to financial reporting quality? Abacus, 49(2), 242–267. Lo, A. W. Y., Wong, R. M. K., & Firth, M. (2010). Can corporate governance deter management from manipulating earnings? Evidence from related-party sales transactions in China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 16(2), 225–235. Mansor, N., Che-Ahmad, a., Ahmad-Zaluki, N. a., & Osman, a. H. (2013). Corporate Governance and Earnings Management: A Study on the Malaysian Family and Non-family Owned PLCs. Procedia Economics and Finance, 7(Icebr), 221–229. Marra, A., & Mazzola, P. (2014). Is Corporate Board More Effective Under IFRS or“‘ It’ s Just an Illusion”’? Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 29(1), 31–60. McGee, R. W., & Yuan, X. (2012). Corporate governance and the timeliness of financial reporting: a comparative study of the People’s Republic of China, the USA and the European Union. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 6(May), 5–16. Meeampol, S., Rodpetch, V., Srinammuang, P., & Wongsorntham, A. (2013). the Relationship Between Corporate Governance and Earnings Quality : a Case Study of Listed Companies in the Stock Exchange of Thailand (Set)”. Management, Knowledge and Learning International Conference, 1345–1353. Morck, R. K., & Steier, L. (2005). The Global History of Corporate Governance : An Introduction. National Bureau of Economics Research (Vol. A History, p. 65). N. O Dibia; J, C. O. (2013). an Examination of the Audit Report Lag of Companies Quoted in the. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(9), 8–16. Nordin, W. (2010). Corporate Governance and Audit Report Lag, 6(2), 57–84. Oladipupo, A. O., & Izedomi, F. I. O. (2013). Relative Contributions of Audit and Management Delays in Corporate Financial Reporting : Empirical Evidence from Nigeria. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(10), 199–204. Oladipupo And Ilaboya, O. J. I. (2013). Late Culture of Corporate Financial Reporting in Nigeria. African Journal of Social Sciences, 3(4), 163–170. Oladipupo, A. O., & Izedonmi, F. (2013). Global Demand for Timely Financial Reporting : How Prepared are Nigerian Companies? Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 4(8), 63–76. Omar, N., & Bakar, K. M. A. (2012). Fraud prevention mechanisms of Malaysian government-linked companies: an assessment of existence and effectiveness. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, 8(1), 15–31. Prommin, P., Jumreornvong, S., & Jiraporn, P. (2014). The effect of corporate governance on stock liquidity: The case of Thailand. International Review of Economics and Finance, 32, 132–142. Puspitaningrum, D., & Atmini, S. (2012). Corporate Governance Mechanism and the Level of Internet Financial Reporting: Evidence from Indonesian Companies. Procedia Economics and Finance, 2(Af), 157–166. Rahman, A., Yammeesri, J., & Perera, H. (2010). Financial reporting quality in international settings: A comparative study of the USA, Japan, Thailand, France and Germany. International Journal of Accounting, 45(1), 1–34. Ramanan, R. a M. N. V. (2015). Corporate Governance , Auditing and Reporting. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 29(3), 306–339. Ramezanpour, I., & Haghdoost, J. (2013). Studying the relationship of earnings quality and Audit delay in accepted companies in Tehran Securities. International Research Journal Of Applied and Basic Sciences, 6(5), 549–555. Robert M. Bushmana, and A. J. S. (2001). Financial accounting information and corporate governance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32, 335–347. Salin, A. S. A. P., Kamaluddin, N., & Manan, S. K. A. (2011). Unstoppable Fraud, Scandals and Manipulation – An Urgent Call for an Islamic-based Code of Ethics. 2011 International Conference on Sociality and Economics Development IPEDR vol.10 (2011) © (2011) IACSIT Press, Singapore, 10, 474–478. Semiu Babatunde Adeyemi. (2011). An empirical investigation of the audit expectation gap (AEG) in Nigeria. African Journal of Business Management, 5(19), 7964–7971. Shrives, P. J., & Brennan, N. M. (2014). A typology for exploring the quality of explanations for non-compliance with UK corporate governance regulations. The British Accounting Review, xxx(Ap), 1–15. Sun, K. (2014). The Relationship Between Capital Allocation Efficiency And Financial Reporting Quality : International Evidence. International Journal of Business, Accounting, and Finance, 8(2), 1–12. Tang, Q., Chen, H., & Lin, Z. (2012). How to Measure Country Level Financial Reporting Quality? SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–36. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2114810. Tran, D. H. (2014). Multiple corporate governance attributes and the cost of capital – Evidence from Germany. The British Accounting Review, 46(2), 179–197. Vuran, B., & Adiloğlu, B. (2013). Is Timeliness of Corporate Financial Reporting Related to Accounting Variables ? Evidence From Istanbul Stock Exchange. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(6), 58–70. Zanani, W., Abdullah, W., Shahnaz, I., & & Nurasyikin, J. (2008). The impact of board composition, ownership and CEO duality on audit quality: The Malaysian evidence. Malaysian Accounting Review, 7, 17–29.