Pengajaran dan pembelajaran pendidikan matematik realistik lndonesia (PMRI) di Sekolah Rendah Aceh

The Indonesian Realistic Mathematics Education (PMRI) was implemented in 2001 in Indonesia and in Aceh in 2006 aimed at improving math achievement in primary schools. However, it was reported that the implementation of mathematics teaching by teachers was not encouraging. In addition, it was also re...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Zubainur, Cut Morina
Format:	Thesis
Language:	eng eng
Published:	2015
Subjects:	LB1501 Primary Education QA Mathematics
Online Access:	https://etd.uum.edu.my/5377/1/s92750.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/5377/2/s92750_abstract.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-uum-etd.5377
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection	UUM ETD
language	eng eng
advisor	Veloo, Arsaythamby
topic	LB1501 Primary Education QA Mathematics
spellingShingle	LB1501 Primary Education QA Mathematics Zubainur, Cut Morina Pengajaran dan pembelajaran pendidikan matematik realistik lndonesia (PMRI) di Sekolah Rendah Aceh
description	The Indonesian Realistic Mathematics Education (PMRI) was implemented in 2001 in Indonesia and in Aceh in 2006 aimed at improving math achievement in primary schools. However, it was reported that the implementation of mathematics teaching by teachers was not encouraging. In addition, it was also reported that mathematical achievement was at a low level when compared with the national level achievement of mathematics in Indonesia.The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of PMRI and explore the types of activities, interaction and student attitudes in mathematics classrooms according to the teacher standards in PMRI. This study used the quantitative and the qualitative approach which involved experiments, observations, questionnaires and interviews. A total of 52 students in year five (5), consisting of 26 students each for the experimental group and the control group, were involved in this study. Data collection was conducted twice through pre- and post-tests with an interval of five (5) weeks. The findings showed that mathematics achievement and the number of activities was higher when using the PMRI. There was also improvement in student interaction, types of questions asked, response to questions, explaining questions, understanding questions and being cooperative. Generally, students showed a positive attitude towards the implementation of PMRI. Besides, this study also showed that the teaching of mathematics which was practiced by the teachers fulfilled the teaching standards of PMRI. The effect of the implementation of PMRI showed that students became more active in the classroom during the teaching and learning of Mathematics. This showed that the mathematics teaching and learning environment was interesting and effective. The results of this study also showed that the teaching and learning of PMRI was implemented in Aceh but not in all the primary schools. The implication of this study is that the Education Department (Dinas) in Aceh should expand the implementation of PMRI in all primary schools so that the teaching and learning of Mathematics become more interesting and effective. The implementation of PMRI in all primary schools in Aceh will help to improve mathematics achievement that is comparable with the national level of mathematics achievement in Indonesia. This study contributes to field of mathematics education as well as policy-making related to primary school curriculum development and mathematics education in Aceh.
format	Thesis
qualification_name	Ph.D.
qualification_level	Doctorate
author	Zubainur, Cut Morina
author_facet	Zubainur, Cut Morina
author_sort	Zubainur, Cut Morina
title	Pengajaran dan pembelajaran pendidikan matematik realistik lndonesia (PMRI) di Sekolah Rendah Aceh
title_short	Pengajaran dan pembelajaran pendidikan matematik realistik lndonesia (PMRI) di Sekolah Rendah Aceh
title_full	Pengajaran dan pembelajaran pendidikan matematik realistik lndonesia (PMRI) di Sekolah Rendah Aceh
title_fullStr	Pengajaran dan pembelajaran pendidikan matematik realistik lndonesia (PMRI) di Sekolah Rendah Aceh
title_full_unstemmed	Pengajaran dan pembelajaran pendidikan matematik realistik lndonesia (PMRI) di Sekolah Rendah Aceh
title_sort	pengajaran dan pembelajaran pendidikan matematik realistik lndonesia (pmri) di sekolah rendah aceh
granting_institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department	Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts & Sciences
publishDate	2015
url	https://etd.uum.edu.my/5377/1/s92750.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/5377/2/s92750_abstract.pdf
_version_	1747827920581165056
spelling	my-uum-etd.53772021-03-29T09:15:33Z Pengajaran dan pembelajaran pendidikan matematik realistik lndonesia (PMRI) di Sekolah Rendah Aceh 2015 Zubainur, Cut Morina Veloo, Arsaythamby Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts & Sciences Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts and Sciences LB1501 Primary Education QA Mathematics The Indonesian Realistic Mathematics Education (PMRI) was implemented in 2001 in Indonesia and in Aceh in 2006 aimed at improving math achievement in primary schools. However, it was reported that the implementation of mathematics teaching by teachers was not encouraging. In addition, it was also reported that mathematical achievement was at a low level when compared with the national level achievement of mathematics in Indonesia.The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of PMRI and explore the types of activities, interaction and student attitudes in mathematics classrooms according to the teacher standards in PMRI. This study used the quantitative and the qualitative approach which involved experiments, observations, questionnaires and interviews. A total of 52 students in year five (5), consisting of 26 students each for the experimental group and the control group, were involved in this study. Data collection was conducted twice through pre- and post-tests with an interval of five (5) weeks. The findings showed that mathematics achievement and the number of activities was higher when using the PMRI. There was also improvement in student interaction, types of questions asked, response to questions, explaining questions, understanding questions and being cooperative. Generally, students showed a positive attitude towards the implementation of PMRI. Besides, this study also showed that the teaching of mathematics which was practiced by the teachers fulfilled the teaching standards of PMRI. The effect of the implementation of PMRI showed that students became more active in the classroom during the teaching and learning of Mathematics. This showed that the mathematics teaching and learning environment was interesting and effective. The results of this study also showed that the teaching and learning of PMRI was implemented in Aceh but not in all the primary schools. The implication of this study is that the Education Department (Dinas) in Aceh should expand the implementation of PMRI in all primary schools so that the teaching and learning of Mathematics become more interesting and effective. The implementation of PMRI in all primary schools in Aceh will help to improve mathematics achievement that is comparable with the national level of mathematics achievement in Indonesia. This study contributes to field of mathematics education as well as policy-making related to primary school curriculum development and mathematics education in Aceh. 2015 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/5377/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/5377/1/s92750.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/5377/2/s92750_abstract.pdf text eng public Ph.D. doctoral Universiti Utara Malaysia Abu Bakar Karim (Mei, 2013). Anggaran Pendidikan Fokus Peningkatan Mutu. Kiprah, 2(0853), 10. Abdul Halim, Lilia Halim, T. Subahan Mohd. Meerah, & Kamisah Osman (2010). Pembangunan instrument penyelesaian masalah sains. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 35(1), 35-39. Ahmad Fauzan (1998). Investigating spatial perception ability of the students at grade 1 senior high school in West Sumatera. Journal of Education Forum 23(4), 100-115. Ahmad Fauzan (2002). Applying Realistic Mathematics Education in Teaching Geometry in Indonesian Primary School (Disertasi doktoral tidak diterbitkan). University of Twente, Enschede. Ahmad Fauzan, Slettenhaar, D. & Plomp, T. (2002). Traditional mathematics education Vs realistic mathematics education: Hoping for changes. Dalam P. Valero & O. Skovsmose, Proceedings of the 3rd International Mathematics Education and Society Conference (pp. 1-4). Copenhagen Denmark, Centre for Researh in Learning Mathematics. Akhmad Sudrajat (2008, Disember 3). Peran guru sebagai fasilitator. Diakses dari http://www.akhmadsudrajat.wordpress.com/2008 Ali, S. (2010, November 8). Class Action. Newsweek, pp. 4. Ananda, S. (2001). Authentic assessment. A web-based system for the professional development of the teachers in contextual teaching and learning projek. Bowling Green, OH: Bowling Green State University. Anas M. Adam (2013, Mei 4). Kualiti Guru di Aceh Masih Rendah. Serambi Indonesia, pp. 9. Andi Bagus (2009, Mei 12). Kurikulum pendidikan di Indonesia. Diakses dari http://andibagus.blogspot.com Anies Baswedan (2014, Disember 5). Kemendikbud hentikan kurikulum 2013 mulai tahun ajaran baru. Diakses dari http://www.tribunnews.com Ary, D., Jacob, L. C., & Razavieh, A. (2002). Introduction to the research in education. (6thed.). United State: Wadsworth Thompson Learning. Asmin. (2006). Implemensi pembelajaran matematika realistik (PMR) dan kendala yang muncul di lapangan. Wacana, 5(2), 34-41. Azizi Y., Jamaluddin R. & Yusof B. (2000). Sumbangan sikap terhadap pencapaian pelajar dalam mata pelajaran matematik: Sejauh manakah hubungan ini relevan? Dapatan kajian tidak diterbitkan. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia. Azizul Rahman Abdul Rahman & Mohamad Saleeh Rahamad (2010). Strategi pengajaran cemerlang. Kuala Lumpur: Majlis Guru Cemerlang Malaysia. Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan (2006). Panduan penyusunan kurikulum tingkat satuan pendidikan jenjang pendidikan dasar dan menengah. Jakarta: BSNP. Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan (2009, Mei 20). Matematika paling menyulitkan dalam UASBN. Diakses dari http://bsnp-indonesia.org Beishuizen, Meindert (1998). Wich mental strategies in the early number curriculum? A comparison of British ideas and Dutch views. British Educational Research Journal, 24(5), 512-562. Bekker, A. (2004). Design research in statistic education on symbolizing and computer tools. Amersfoort: Wilco. Bennis, W. (1966). Changing Organization, New York: McGraw-Hill. Bennis, W. (1989). On Becoming a Leader. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley. Berns, R., & Erickson, P. (2001). An Interactive Webbased Model for the Professional Development of Teachers in Contextual Teaching and Learning. Bowling Green State University. Diakses dari http://www.bgsu.edu/ctl Bonotto, C. (2005). How informal out-of school mathematics can help students make sense of formal in-school mathematics: The case of multiplying by decimal numbers. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Bonotto, C. (2008).Realistic mathematical modeling and problem posing. Dalam W. Blum, P. Galbraith, M. Niss. H. W. Henn (Eds.) Modelling and Applications in Mathematics Education (pp. 185-192). New York: Spinger. Borich, G. D. (2004). Observation skills of effective teaching. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company. Borko, H. & Putnam, R. (1998).The role of context in teacher learning and teacher education. Diakses dari http://www.contextual.org. Boswinkel, N. & F. Moerlands (2003). Het topje van de ijsberg:[The top of the Iceberg. Poster session presented at the National Conference on arithmmetic, a practical view. Utrecht. Brantlinger, E. (2003). Dividing Classes. New York: Routledge. Briner, M. (1999). Learning theories. Diakses dari http://curriculum.calstatela.edu/faculty/ psparks/theorists/501learn.htm Brockman, D. & Brockman, D. (2001). Multiple intelligences. A web-based system for the professional development of teachers in contextual teaching and learning project. Bowling Green, OH: Bowling GreenState University. Bron.(1998). Realistic Mathematics Education work in progress. Diakses dari http://www.fi.uu.nl. Brooks, J. G. & Brooks, M. G. (1993). In search of understanding: The case for constuctivist classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD). Bryk, A., Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in Schools. New York: Russell Sage. Buck Institute for Education (2001). Project-based Learning. A Web-based System for the Professional Development of Teachers in Contextual Teaching and Learning Project. BowlingGreen, OH: Bowling Green State University. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental design for research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. Campbell, E. (2006). Curricular and Professional Authority in Schools, Curriculum Inquiry, 36(2), 111-118. Canada, G. (2010). Bringing Change to Scale: The next Big Reform Challenge. Dalam Karl Weber (Eds.), Waiting for Superman. New York: Public Affairs. Capra, F. (1996). The web of live: A new scientific understanding of living systems, New York: Anchor. Cavey, L. O., Whitenack, J. W., & Lovin, L. (2006). Investigating teachers‟ matheamatics teaching understanding: a case for coordinating perspectives. Education Studies in Mathematics, 64, 19-43. Chua Yan Piaw. (2009). Statistic penyelidikan lanjutan: Ujian univariat dan multivariate. Kuala Lumpur: McGraw-Hill. Clarke, B., Clarke, D., & Sullivan, P. (1996). The mathematics teacher and curriculum development. Dalam A. J. Bishop (Eds.), International Handbook of Mathematics Educational (pp. 1207-1233). The Netherlands: Kluwer. Cobb, P. (1994). Theories of Mathematical Learning and Construction: A Personal View. Paper symposium on Trends and Perspectives in Mathematics Education, Klagenfurt: Germany. Cole, A. L., & Knowles, J. G. (2001). Lives in Context: The Art Life History Research. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press. Collette, A. T. & Chiappetta, E. L. (1994). Science instruction in the middle and secondary (3th ed.). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company. Conway, P. & Sloane, F. C. (2005, Oktober). International trends in post-primary mathematics education. Hasil kajian tidak diterbitkan, Universiti College Cork, Ireland. Cook-Sather, A. (2006). Sound, Presence, and Power: Student Voice in Educational Research and Reform, Curriculum Inquiry, 36(4), 359-390. Cooper, B. & Harries, T. (2002). Childrens responses to contrasting realistic mathematics problems just how realistic are children ready to be. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers Printed in Netherlands Cramer, K. A., Post, T. R., & delMas, R. C. (2002). Initial fractions learning by fourth-and fifth-grades students: A comparason of the effects of using commercial curricula with the effects of using the rasional number project curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematucs Education,33(2), 111-144. Creswell, J. W. & Clark, V. L. P (2007). Design and conducting: mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Creswell, J. W. (2008). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. (2nded.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Cut Morina Zubainur (2007). Pendidikan matematika realistik Indonesia berbasis budaya Aceh. Serambi Ilmu, 2(3), 17-25 Cut Morina Zubainur (2008, Disember). Mengkonstruksi algoritma perkalian dengan pembelajaran matematika realistik pada siswa SD/MI. Pembentangan kertas kerja di Seminar Nasional Lustrum ke-2 & ulang tahun ke-47 FKIP Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh. Cut Morina Zubainur, Darmiati, Ibrahim, Su‟id (2009, Oktober). Kurikulum integratif dengan pendekatan realistik pada pembelajaran tematik di sekolah dasar. Majalah PMRI, 7(4), 54-58. Cut Morina Zubainur, & Arsaythamby Veloo (2013, September). Tahap Guru melaksanakan pengajaran matematika dengan standard guru pendidikan matematik realistik Indonesia (PMRI) di sekolah rendah Aceh. Pembentangan kertas kerja pada International Conference on Special Education 2013 Consortium of Asia-Pasific Education Universities (CAPEU), Banda Aceh. Cut Morina Zubainur, Rahmah Johar & Erna Wirda (2014, November) Pengenalan Bilangan Desimal di Kelas IV Sekolah Dasar. Pembentangan kertas kerja pada Seminar Nasional Matematika Terapan (SIMANTAP) 2014 Indo-MS Aceh Sumatera Utara, Pematang Siantar. Danielson, C. (1996). Enchancing proffesional practice: A frame work for teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervisor and Curriculum Development. de Figueiredo, N. J. C. (1999). Ethnic minority students solving contextual problems. Utrecht: Freudenthal Institute. de Lange, J. (1999). Mathematics insight and meaning. Utrecht: OW & OC. de Lange, J. (1994). Assessing mathematical skills, understanding, and thingking. In Richard Lesh and J. Lamon (Eds.), Asessment of Authentic Performance in School Mathematics (pp. 78-96). Texas: AAAS Press. de Lange, J. (1995). Assessment: No change without problem.In T. Romberg (Eds.) Reform in school mathematics and authentic assessment (pp. 67-91). Albany NY: State University of New York Press. de Lange, J. (1996). Using and applying mathematics in educational. Dalam A.J. Bishop, et al. (Eds.), International Handbook of Mathematics Educational(49-97). The: Netherlands: Kluwer. Dekker, T. (2007, September).The Dutch Experience, Threat or Treat? Dalam Close, S., Corcoran, D. & Dooley, T. (Eds.), Prosiding Second National Conference on Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 7-13), St. Patrik‟s College, Dublin. Denni Iskandar (2013, July 3). Kurikulum 2013 sumbat kreativiti guru. Diakses dari http://aceh.tribunnews.com Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan (1997). Statistik persekolahan 1995/1996. Jakarta: Depdikbud. Departemen Pendidikan Nasional (2002). Manajemen peningkatan mutu berbasis sekolah, Buku 5, pembelajaran dan pengajaran kontekstual. Jakarta: Depdiknas. Departemen Pendidikan Nasional (2002). Pendekatan kontekstual (contextual teaching & learning/CTL). Jakarta: Dikdasmen Direktorat Pendidikan Lanjutan Pertama. Departemen Pendidikan Nasional (2006). Peraturan pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nombor 19 Tahun 2005 Tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan. Jakarta: Depdiknas. Departemen Pendidikan Nasional(2007). Model Silabus dan Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Matematika. Jakarta: Depdiknas. Departemen Pendidikan Nasional(2013, Jun 16). Hasil UASBN SD. Diakses dari http://www.depdiknas.co.id Dian Armanto (2002). Teachig multiplication and division realistically in Indonesian primary school: a prototype of local instructional theory (Disertasi doctoral tidak dipublikasikan). University of Twente:Enschede. Dickinson, P. & Eade, F. (2005, November). Trialling realistic mathematics education (RME) in English secondary schools. Dalam Hewitt, D. Proceedings of British Society for research into learning mathematics, 25(3). Diakses dar ihttp://www.bsrlm.org.uk Dickinson, P., Eade, F., & Gough S. (2010, April). Using realistic mathematics education with low to middle attaining pupils in secondary schools. In Joubert, M. & Andrews, P. (Eds) ProsidingBritish Congress for mathematics education. Diakses dari http://www.bsrlm.org.uk Dinas Pendidikan Aceh (2010). Hasil ujian nasional SD, SMP dan SMA Provinsi Aceh tahun 2009. Naskah tidak dipublikasikan, Banda Aceh, Indonesia. Dinas Pendidikan Aceh (2010). Laporan perkembangan kualitas lulusan sekolah di Provinsi Aceh. Naskah tidak dipublikasikan, Banda Aceh, Indonesia. Dinas Pendidikan Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam (2004). Hasil uji kemampuan guru perbidang studi se-Provinsi NAD. Naskah tidak dipublikasikan, Banda Aceh, Indonesia. Djemari Mardapi (2009, Jun 7). Nilai UASBN naik. Diakses dari http://bsnpindonesia.org Dooley, T. (2005). 'Litres can't go into millilitres': The effects of standard algorithms on children's thinking. Dalam S. Close, T. Dooley & D. Corcoran (Eds.), Proceedings of the First National Conference on Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 80 - 96), St. Patrick's College, Dublin. Doorman, M., Drijvers, P., Dekker, T., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., de Lange, J., & Wijers, M. (2007). Problem solving a challenge for mathematics education in the Netherlands. ZDM Mathematics Education, 39, 405-418. doi:10.1007/s11858-007-0043-2 Drake, C., &Sherin, M. G. (2006). Practicing Change: Curriculum Adaption and Teacher Narrative in the Context of Mathematics Education Reform, Curriculum Inquiry, 36(2), 153-187. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Orlando, FL: Harcourt. Egan, K. (2008). The Future of Education. New Haven: Yale University Press. Eka Supriatna (2011). Pendekatan kontekstual dalam pendidikan jasmani. Jurnal Visi Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(3), 577-589. Ekholm, M., & van den Hoven, G. H. (2009). PMRI-Majulah! Report of the DOPMRI International Advisory Board. Jakarta, Utrecht: APS International. Ellis, S. S. & Whalen, S. F. (1992). Key to cooperative learning. Instructor, 1001(6), 34-37. Elmore, R. E. (2007). School Reform from the Inside Out.Fourth Printing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press. Engco Mulyasa (2005). Kurikulum berbasis kompetensi. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya. Engco Mulyasa (2007). Kurikulum tingkat satuan pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya. Engco Mulyasa (2009). Menjadi guru profesional: menciptakan pembelajaran kreatif dan menyenangkan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya. Freudenthal, H. (1971). Geometry between the devil and the deep sea. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 3(3), 413-435. Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting mathematics education. China Lectures. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Fullan, M. (2009). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teacher College Press. Fullan, M., Hill, P., Crevola, C. (2006). Breakthrough. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2003). Educational research an introduction (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Gega, P. C. (1994). Science in elementary education. Seventh edition. New York: Macmillan Publising Company. Goldin, G. A. (1992). Epistemology, constructivism and discovery learning in mathematics. JRME Monograph Number 4.USA: NCTM. Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ”. New York: Bantam Book. Goodlad, J. I. (1997). In Praise of Education. New York: Teachers College Press. Gravemeijer, K. (1994). Developing realistic mathematics education. Utrecht: CD-β Press. Gravemeijer, K. (1999). How Emergent Models May Foster the Constitution of Formal Mathematics. Mathematical thinking and Learning, 1(2), 155-177. Gravemeijer, K. (2004). Local instruction theories as means of support for teachers in reform mathematics education. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 105-128. Gravemeijer, K. (2010). Realistic mathematics education theory as a guideline for problem-centered, interactive mathematics education. Dalam R. Sembiring, K Hoogland & M. Dolk (Eds.), A decade of PMRI in Indonesia, (pp. 41-50). Bandung, Utrecht: APS International. H. Julie (2003, Mac). Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi dan Pembelajaran Matematik dengan Pendekatan Realistik. Pembentangan kertas kerja di Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematik Universitas Sanata Darma, Yogyakarta. Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2001). Implementing Change: Patterns, Principles, and Potholes. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Hartley, H. J. (1988). Budgeting.In R. A. Gorton (Ed.), Encyclopedia of School Administration and Supervision (pp. 40-41). New York: Oryx Press. Harvey, T. R. (1990). Checklist for Change. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Henson, K. T. (2001). Curriculum Planning: Integrating Multiculturalism, Constructivisme, and Educational Reform, 2nded. New York: McGraw- Hill. Herman Hudoyo (1998). Pembelajaran matematika menurut pandangan konstruktivis. Jurnal Teknologi Pembelajaran PPS IKIP Malang, 6(2), 12-18. Hoang, T. (2000). Vai net doi moi phuang phap giong day Toan. Tap Chi Gi ao Duc, 5, 19-20. Holubec, E. (2001).Cooperative Learning..A Webbased System for the Professional Development of Teachers in Contextual Teaching and Learning Project. Bowling Green, OH: Bowling Green State University. Hoogland, K. (2004, September). Critical success factors for an effective implementation. A case study: PMRI. Pembentangan kertas kerja di Conference on the Recent Progress in Mathematics Education (CRPME), Bandung. I. Karnasih & Soeparno (1999, May 17). Teaching mathematics has to focus on logic. Kompas. pp. 2. Iskandar Agung(2010). Meningkatkan kreativitas pembelajaran bagi guru: Pedoman dan acuan untuk guru dalam meningkatkan kreativitas pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bestari Buana Murni. Jailani (1990). Suatu studi pengadaan terapan matematik pada pelajar SMP Negeri di Kodya Yogyakarta. Malang: IKIP Malang. Jared, L. (2007, September). Private and Public: Doing Mathematics in Different Places. In Close, S., Corcoran, D. & Dooley, T. Prosiding Second National Conference on Research in Matkematics Education (pp.79-91), St. Patrik‟s College, Dublin. Johnson, D. & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning together and alone:Cooperative, Competitive and individualistic learning (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Johnson, E. B. (2002). Contextual teaching and Learning, what it is and why its here to stay. Thaousand Oaks: Corwin Press, Inc. Johnson, H. T. & Broms, A. (2000). Profit without measure: Extraordinary results through attention to work and people. New York: Free Press. Kamarudin, H. (1994). KBSM dan Strategi Pengajaran Bahasa. Subang Jaya: Kumpulan Budiman Sdn. Bhd. Kamii, C. (1990). Constructivism and beginning arithmetic. Dalam T. J. Cooney & C. H. Hirsch (Eds.), Teaching and Learning Mathematics in the 1990s. Yearbook, Reston, Virginia: NCTM. Kerans, D.S. (1994). Teaching geometry at primary schools in Kupang, East Nusa Tenggara Indonesia. Surabaya State University. Keuper-Makkink, Anni (2010). My involvement with PMRI.Dalam R. Sembiring, K Hoogland & M. Dolk (Eds.), A decade of PMRI in Indonesia (pp. 33-39). Bandung, Utrecht: APS International. Kwon, O. N. (2005). Conceptualizing the realistic mathematics education approach in the teaching and learning of ordinary differential equestions. Diakses dari http://www.math.uoc. gr/~ictm2/Procedings/invKwo.pdf. Laisani (2012). Hasil UASBN SD/MI diumumkan hari ini. Diakses dari http://aceh.tribunnews.com Lave, J. (1998). Cognition in practice: mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Levine, D. U., Levine, R. F., & Ornstein, A. C. (1985).Guidelines for Change and Innovation in the Secondary School Curriculum.NASSP Bulletin, 5, 9-14. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. New Park, CA: Sage Publications. M. Uzer Usman (2002). Menjadi Guru yang Profesional. Bandung: Rosdakarya. Manan, A. A. (1998). Langkah-langkah strategi ke arah pemecahan masalah peningkatan mutu SLTP. Jakarta: Ministry of national educational. Margulis, L. & Sagan, D. (1995). What is life? New York: Simon & Schuster. Marsh, C. M. J.,& Willis, G. (2007). Curriculum: Aternative Approaches, Ongoing Issues (4thed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson. Marshal, C., &Olivia, M. (2006). Leadership for Social Justice. Boston: Pearson. Marsigit (2000, July). Empirical evidence of Indonesia styles of primary teaching. Pembentangan kertas kerja di ICME conference, Hiroshima. Martin, R. E. (1994). Teaching science for all children. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Mastuhu (2003). Menata ulang pemikiran sistem pendidikan nasional dalam abad 21. Jakarta: Safiria Insani Press & MSI. Mawardi (2013). 115 Murid SD/MI tak lulus UASBN. Serambi Indonesia. Diakses dari http://aceh.tribunnews.com Maxwell, J. A. (1996). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, London and New Delhi: SAGE. McBrien, J. L. & Brandt, R. S. (1997). The language of learning: A Guide to Education Terms. Alexandria, VA: Association for supervision and curriculum development (ASCD). McNeil, J. D. (2000). Curriculum: A Comprehensive Introduction (6thed.). Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman. McPherson, K. (2001). Service Learning.A Web-based System for the Professional Development of Teachers in Contextual Teaching and Learning Project. Bowling Green, OH: BowlingGreen State University, 2001. Merriam, S. B. (1990). Case study research in education. A qualitative approach. California: Jossey-Bass Inc., Publisher. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case studies application in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc., Publisher. Merriam, S. B. (2003). Qualitative research in practice examples for discussion and analysis (1sted.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc., Publisher. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc., Publisher. Miller, S. R., Drill, K., & Behrstock, E. (2010). Meeting Teachers Half Way: Making Educational Reseach Relevant to Teachers. Indiana: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation. Moffitt, M. (2001). Problem-based Learning. A Webbased System for the Professional Development of Teachers in Contextual Teaching and Learning Project. Bowling Green, OH: Bowling Green State University. Mohd Majid Konting (2000). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Mohd Nazar Mohamed (1992). Pengantar psikologi: satu pengenalan asas kepada jiwa dan tingkah laku manusia. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Mohd Salleh Abu & Zaidatun Tasir (2001). Pengenalan kepada analisis data berkomputer SPSS 10.0 for windows. Kuala Lumpur: Venton Publishing. Moleong (2002). Metodelogi penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya. Muchlas Samani & Hariyanto (2011). Konsep dan model pendidikan karakter. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya. Muchlas Samani (2009, Julai). Mengekspor Kijang PMRI. Majalah PMRI,7(3), 35-36. Muhammad Ilyas (2006, Maret 5). 50% guru di Aceh tidak layak mengajar. Serambi Indonesia, pp. 1. Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O., Beaton, A.E., Gonzalez, E.J., Kelly, D.L., & Smith, T.A. (1997). Mathematics Achievement in the Primary School Years: IEAís Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). Chestnut Hill, MA: BostonCollege. Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O., Gonzalez, E. J., Gregory, K. D., Garden, R. A., O‟Connor, K.M., et al. (2000) TIMSS 1999 International Mathematics Report: Findings from IEA’s Repeat of the Third International Mathematics and Science at the Eighth Grade Chestnut Hill, MA: International Study Center, Boston College, Lynch School of Education. Musliar Kasim (2013). Pengumuman Hasil Kelulusan UN SD 2013. Diakses dari http://pengumuman.com Mustafa Kamal (2013). Info Uji Kompetensi Awal (UKA) sertifikasi guru tahun 2013. Diakses dari http://regional.kompasiana.com Needham, R. (1987). Teaching strategies for developing understanding in science. Leeds, Childrens Learning in Science Project, University of Leeds. Nguyen, BK & Vu, DT (2001). Phuong Phap Day Hoc Toan. Ha Noi: Education Press Nguyen, CT (2003). Doi moi cach day, cach hoc tat yeu dan toi su doi moi quan ly day va hoc. Tap Chi Giao Duc thao khoa hoc ve doi moi noi dung, Phuong phap day hoc o cac truong dai hoc su pham, 7(28), pp. 22–27). Nguyen, T. T., Dekker, R. & Goedhart, M. J. (2008). Preparing Vietnamese student teachers for teaching with a student-centered approach. Journal Mathematics Teachers Education 11,61-81. Nik Aziz Nik Pa (1999). Pendekatan konstruktivisme radikal dalam pendidikan matematik. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya. Nodings, N. (1992). Constructivism in Mathematics Education. JRME Monograph No. 4 USA: NCTM. Noraini Idris (2010). Penyelidikan dalam pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: McGraw-Hill. Nunnaly, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw Hill. Nur Ashiqin, N. (2004). Sikap Pelajar Matrikulasi Terhadap Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran Matematik Dalam Bahasa Inggeris. Hasil Kajian tidak dipublikasikan, Kolej Matrikulasi Melaka, Malaysia. Nurhadi (2002). Pembelajaran kontekstual (Contextual Teaching & Learning). Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang. Nyoman, S. Degeng (1998). Pembelajaran Berasaskan Pendekatan Kesemrawutan. Jurnal Teknologi Pembelajaran, 6(3),12-20. Omar Hamalik (2010). Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. Ornstein, A. C., Hunkins, F. P. (2013). Curriculum: Foundation, Principles, and Issues. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc. P4MRI Unsyiah (2010). Laporan kegiatan pendidikan matematika realistik Indonesia (PMRI) Universitas Syiah Kuala Tahun 2009. Banda Aceh: Universitas Syiah Kuala. Parkay, F. W. (1995). Becoming a teacher (5thed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Perera, W. (2010). Lesson from Sri Lankan primary reforms and Indonesian PMRI. Factors that contribute to the success of classroom reform. Dalam R. Sembiring, K Hoogland & M. Dolk (Eds.), A decade of PMRI in Indonesia (pp. 75-84). Bandung, Utrecht: APS International. Piaget, J. (1985). The equilibrium of cognitive structures: The central problem of intellectual development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. PMRI Unsyiah (2008). Profil pendidikan matematika realistik Indonesia (PMRI) Universitas Syiah Kuala. Banda Aceh: Universitas Syiah Kuala. Pusat Kurikulum (2002). Kurikulum dan hasil belajar, kompetensi dasar mata pelajaran matematika sekolah dasar dan madrasah ibtidaiyah. Jakarta: Balitbang Depdiknas. Pusat Kurikulum dan Perbukuan (2011).Pedoman pelaksanaan pendidikan berkarakter. Jakarta: Balitbang Kemdiknas. Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum (2001, Julai). Pembelajaran secara konstruktivisme. Kuala Lumpur: Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum, Kementrian Pendidikan Malaysia. R. Soedjadi (2007). Masalah kontekstual sebagai batu sendi matematika sekolah. Surabaya: Pusat Sains dan Matematika Sekolah Unesa. R. Soedjadi. (1991). The feature of mathematics education at our primary school. Indonesia, Surabaya State University. R. Soedjadi. (2000, April 17). Teaching mathematics has to focus on thinking process. Kompas, pp. 4. Rahmah Johar & Vidia Purnamasari (2007). Interaksi siswa dalam pembelajaran matematika realistic pada materi keliling dan luas di kelas IV MIN Rukoh Banda Aceh. Naskah yang tidak diterbitkan, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh. RahmahJohar (2001, Februari). Konstruktivisme atau realistik? Pembentangan kertas kerja di Seminar Nasional Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) Jurusan Matematika FMIPA UNESA, Surabaya. Rahmah Johar (2006, Mac). Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Pendekatan Realistik dan Relevansinya dengan KBK. Kertas kerja yang dibentangkan di mesyuarat Pertemuan Guru-Guru SD/MI Gugus I Kecamatan Candung, Bukittinggi Indonesia. Rahmah Johar (2010). PMRI in Aceh. Dalam R. Sembiring, K Hoogland & M. Dolk (Eds.), A decade of PMRI in Indonesia, (pp. 115-122). Bandung, Utrecht: APS International. Raihan Iskandar (2012). Hasil Ujian Kompetensi Guru Provinsi Aceh Memprihatinkan. Diakses dari http://lintasgayo.com Rajecki, D.W. (1989). Attitudes (Second Edition) Sunderland, MA.: Sinauer. Ridwan (2008, Mac 2). Ketercapaian prestasi belajar. Diakses dari http://ridwan202.wordpress.com Robert Sembiring, Hoogland, K. & Dolk, M. (2010) Introduction to: A decade of PMRI in Indonesia.Bandung, Utrecht: APS International. Robert Sembiring, Hoogland, Kees (2008). PMRI: A nort-south partnership for improving mathematics education in Indonesia. Pembentangan kertas kerja di ICSEI 2008: The 21st annual meeting of the International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement. Robert Sembiring, Sutarto Hadi, Dolk, M. (2008). Reforming mathematics learning in Indonesia classrooms through RME. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education 40(6), 927-939. Roestiyah, N. K. (1982). Masalah-masalah ilmu keguruan. Jakarta: Bina Aksara. Romberg, A., & de Lange, J. (1998). Mathematics in context: Teachers resource and implementation guide. Chicago: Britannica Mathematics System. Rosenberg, M.J. & Hovland, C.I. 1960. Attitude organization and change. New Haven: Yale University Perss. S. Haji (1994). Diagnosis kesukaran pelajar dalam menyelesaikan soalan cerita di darjah lima SD Negeri Percobaan Surabaya. Naskah tidak diterbitkan, IKIP Malang, Malang. S. Hamid Hasan (2009, Mac 18). Nilai UASBN Naik. Diakses dari http://www.bsnpindonesia. org S. Nasution (2003). Pengembangan Kurikulum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti. Salomon, E. (1993). Distributed cognitions: psychologhical and educational considerations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Sarason, S. B. (1990). The Predictable Failure of Educational Reform. San Francisco: Jossey-Bas. Sardiman, A. M. (2010). Interaksi & motivasi belajar mengajar. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers. Schmoker, M. (2006). Results Now. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Sekaran, Uma (2003). Research Methods for Business: A small building approach. New York. John Wiley & Sons.Inc. Sergiovanni, T. (1992). Educational Governance and Administration, 3rd ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Shindunata (2001). Pendidikan: Kegelisahan sepanjang zaman. Yogyakarta: Kanisius. Shreyar, S., Zolkower, &B., Perez, S. (2010). Thinking aloud together: a teacher‟s semiotic mediation of a whole-class conversation about percents. Education Studies Mathematics 73, 21-53. Siti M. Amin, Julie, H., Munk, F. & Hoogland, K. (2010). The development of learning materials for PMRI. Dalam R. Sembiring, K Hoogland & M. Dolk (Eds.), A decade of PMRI in Indonesia (pp. 163-174). Bandung, Utrecht: APS International. Slameto (2010). Belajar dan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. Slavin, R. E. (1997). Educational psychology: theory and practice (4thed.). Massachusetts: Allyn & Bacon Publishers. Slavin, R. E. (2005). Cooperative learning: theory, research and practice. London: Allyn & Bacon Publishers. Sloan, K. (2006). Teacher Identity and Agency in School Worlds: Beyond the All-Good/All-Bad Discourse on Accountability-Explicit Curriculum Policies, Curriculum Inquiry, 36(2), 119-152. Smith, C. (2001). Work-based Learning: a Web-based System for the Professional Development of Teachers in Contextual Teaching and Learning Project. Bowling Green, OH: Bowling Green State University. Smith, C. (2001). Work-based learning. A web-based system for the professional development of teachers in contextual teaching and learning project. Bowling Green, OH: Bowling Green State University. Smith, R. (2002). Effective Primary School. London: HMSO. Soder, R. (2001). The Lenguage of Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Somerset, A. (1997). Strengthening Quality in Indonesia’s Junior Secondary School: An Overview of Issues and Initiatives.Jakarta: MOEC. Sprinthall, R. C., Schmutte, G. T., & Sirois, L. (1991). Understanding Education research. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Straehler-Pohl, H. (2009). Recognizing what the talks is about: discussing realistic problem as a means of stratification on performance. Naskah tidak diterbitkan, Departement for Educational Studies and Psychologi. Freie Universitat Berlin. Streefland, L. (1991). Realistic mathematics education in primary school. Ultrecht: CD-ß Press, Freudenthal Institute. Subadrah Nair, & Malar Muthiah (2005). Penggunaan model konstruktivisme lima fasa Needham dalam pembelajaran sejarah. Jurnal Pendidik dan Pendidikan, 20, 21-41. Subhan (2007).Perjalanan Kurikulum Nasional (pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah). Diakses darihttp://rbaryans.wordpress.com Sudjatmiko (2009, Mei 11). Sekolah tentukan nilai kelulusan UASBN. Diakses dari http://bsnp-indonesia.org Sulistiyo (2014, Disember 30). Dualisme Kurikulum Diminta Tak Berkepanjangan. Suara Merdeka, pp. 9. Suryanto (1996). Junior Scondary School Mathematics: Diagnostic Survey. Jakarta: MOEC. Suryanto (2007, January). Pendidikan Matematika Realistik Indonesia. Majalah PMRI, 5(1), 8-10. Sutarto Hadi & I Gusti Ng. Wiraatmaja (2007, May). Teacher professional development through schools cluster meeting. Kertas kerja dibentangkan di Second International Conference on Science and Mathematics Education (CoSMEd). Penang Malaysia. Sutarto Hadi (2002). Effective teacher professional development for implementation of Realistic Mathematics Education in Indonesia (Disertasi doktoral tidak diterbitkan). University of Twenty, Enschede. Sutarto Hadi (2005). Pendidikan matematika realistik dan implementasinya. Banjarmasin: Tulip. Sutarto Hadi (2007, Januari). Keberaksaraan matematika. Majalah PMRI, 5(1), 3. Sutarto Hadi (2009, Julai). Pelatihan RME untuk Guru ASEAN berlangsung di Yogyakarta. Majalah PMRI, 7(3), 22. Sutarto Hadi, Dolk, M. & Zonneveld, E. (2010). The role of key teachers in PMRI dissemination. Dalam R. Sembiring, K Hoogland & M. Dolk (Eds.), A decade of PMRI in Indonesia, (pp. 123-130). Bandung, Utrecht: APS International. Sutarto Hadi, Zulkardi & Hoogland, K. (2010). Quality assurance in PMRI-design of standards of PMRI. In R. Sembiring, K Hoogland & M. Dolk (Eds.), A decade of PMRI in Indonesia. Bandung, Utrecht: APS International. Swimme, B. & Berry, T. (1992). The universe story: From the primordial flaring forth to the ecozoic era-A celebration of the unfolding of the cosmos. San Fransisco: HarperSanFransisco. Syaifuddin Sabda (2006). Model kurikulum terpadu IPTEK & IMTAQ. Ciputat: Quantum Teaching. Syaiful Bahri Djamarah (2000). Guru dan Anak Didik dalam Interaksi Edukatif. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. Syed Arabi (1992). Kaedah penyelidikan komunikasi dan sains sosial. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Tanwey Gerson Ratumanan (2000). Belajar dan pembelajaran. Ambon: Universitas Pattimura. Thiessen, D. (2006). Student Knowledge, Engagement, and Voice in Educational Reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 36(4) 345-358. Tobin, K., Tippins, D., & Gallard, A. (1994). Dalam D. Gobel (Eds.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp.45-93). New York: Macmillan Publising Company. Treffers, A. (1987). Three dimension. A model of goal and theory description in mathematics education, Dordrecht: Riedel. Treffers, A. (1991). Didactical background of a mathematics program for primary education. Dalam L. Streefland (Ed.), Realistic Mathematics Education in Primary School (pp. 21-56), Utrecht: CD-β Press. Treffers, A. & Goffree, F. (1985). Rational Analysis of Realistic Mathematics Education the Weskobas Program.Dalam L. Streffland (Eds.), Proceeding of ninth international conference for the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 97-121). Noordeijkerhout. Truesdale, V., Thompson, C., & Lucas, M. (2004). Use of Curriculum Mapping to Build a Learning Community. Dalam Heidi Hayes Jacobs (Eds.), Getting Results with Curriculum Mapping(pp. 10-24). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Tsai, Yu-ling & Chang, Ching-Kuch (2009). Using combinatorial approach to improve students‟ learning of the distributive law and multiplicative identities. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education7, 501-531. Turmudi & Dasari, D. (2001). Peningkatan kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematika bagi siswa SLTP melalui pendekatan realistik. Naskah tidak diterbitkan, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung. Turmudi & Josua Sabandar (2002). Kerjasama mahasiswa calon guru dan guru bidang studi dalam mengembangkan desain pembelajaran matematika realistik di SMP Negeri Kota Bandung. Grand research report, Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. van den Brink, J. (1973). Bijnanoemen. Wiskobasbulletin 3, 129-131. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (1996).Assessment and realistic mathematics education. Utrecth: CD-β Press. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (1998). Realistic Mathematics Education: Work in Progess. In T. G. Breitig & G. Brekker (Eds.), Theory into practice in Mathematics Education. Prosiding NORMA 98 – the second Nordic Conference Mathematics Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Sciences, Kristiansand. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, Marja (Eds.). (2001). Children learn mathematics: a learning teaching trajektory with intermediate attainment targets for calculating with whole numbers in primary school. Utrecht: Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht University. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, Marja (2003).The didactical use of models in Realistic Mathematics Education: An example from a longitudinal trajectory on percentage. Educational Studies in Mathematics 54: 9-35. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, Marja (Eds.). (2005). Young children learn measurment and geometry: a learning teaching trajektory with intermediate attainment targets for the lower grades in primary chool. Utrecht: Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht University. van den Hoven, G. H. (2010). PMRI: a rolling reform strategy in process. Dalam R. Sembiring, K Hoogland & M. Dolk (Eds.), A decade of PMRI in Indonesia, (51-66). Bandung, Utrecht: APS International. van Reenwijk, M. (2001). From informal to formal, progressive formalization: an example on solving systems of equation. Utrecht: Freudenthal Institute Diakses dari http://fi.uu.nl/publicaties/literatuur/4465.pdf. van Velzen, Boudewijn (2010). Education Reform in Waves: the Case of PMRI. Dalam R. Sembiring, K Hoogland & M. Dolk (Eds.), A decade of PMRI in Indonesia (pp. 67-73). Bandung, Utrecht: APS International. W. Widjaja (2008). Local instruction theory on decimals: the case of Indonesian preservice teachers. (Disertasi doktoral tidak diterbitkan, University of Melbroune, Melbroune. Waladin, Warul (2005, Jun). Refleksi Pendidikan Aceh Dulu, Kini, dan ke Depan. Kertas kerja dibentangkan dalamDiskusi Panel Nasional Recovery Pendidikan Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam, Forum Mahasiswa Pascasarjana Aceh Malang, Malang. Watts & Pope (1989). Thinking about thinking, learning about learning: constructivisn in physics education. Physics Education, 24, 326-331. Webb, D. (2010). Discourse based assessment in the mathematics classroom: A study of teachers instructionally embedded assessment practices. Deutschland: Lambert Academic Publising. Wiens, J. R. (2006). Educational Leadership as Civic Humans. Dalam Paul Kelleher and Rebecca van der Bogert, Voices for Democracy: Struggles and Celebrations of Transformational Leaders, 199-225 (105thed.). Yearbook, Part I. Malden, MA: National Society for The Study of Education/Blackwell. Wiersma, W. (1995). Research methods in education: An introduction (7th ed). Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Wijdeveld, E. (1980). Zich realiseren, in IOWO, de achterkant van de Mobius, IOWO. Utrecht, The Netherland, 23-26. Wiles, J., Bondi, J. (2007). Curriculum Development: A Guide to Practice (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson. Wina Sanjaya (2008). Strategi Pembelajaran; Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group. Winkel, W. S. (1996). Psikologi pendidikan. Jakarta: Gramedia. Winograd, P. & Paris, P. (2001).self-regulated learning. A web-based system for the professional development of teachers in contextual teaching and learning project. Bowling Green, OH: Bowling Green State University. Wyndhamn, J., & Saljo, R. (1997). Word problems and mathematical reasoning – A study of childrens mastery of reference and meaning in textual realities. Learning and Instruction, 7, 361 – 382. Yager, R. (1991). The Constructivist Learning Model: Towards Real Reform in Science Education. The Science Teacher, 58(6), 52-57. Yenni B. Widjaya & Heck, A. (2003). How a Realistic Mathematics Education approach and microcomputer-based laboratory worked in lessons on graphing at an Indonesian Junior High School.Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Shoutheast Asia,26, 1-51. Yansen Marpaung (2001). Prospek Realistic Mathematics Indonesia untuk pembelajaran matematika di Indonesia. Surabaya: Unesa. Yuwono, Ipung (2001, Februari). RME (Realistics Mathematics Education) dan Studi Awal Implementasi di SLTP. Kertas kerja dibentangkan dalam Seminar Nasional Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) Jurusan Matematika FMIPA UNESA, Surabaya. Zainal Abidin (2008).Meningkatkan motivasi berprestasi, kemampuan pemecahan masalah, dan hasil belajar siswa kelas IV SD melalui pembelajaran matematik realistic dengan strategi kooperatif. (Disertasi doctoral tidak diterbitkan). Universitas Pendidikan Bandung, Bandung. Zamroni (2000). Paradigma baru pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Graf. Zulkardi (2002). Developing a learning environment on Realistic Mathematics Education for Indonesian student teachers. (Disertasi doktoral tidak diterbitkan). University of Twente, Enschede. Zulkardi (2003). Peningkatan mutu pendidikan matematematika melalui mutu pembelajaran. Bulletin PMRI. Diakses dalam http://www.pmri.co.id/ Zulkardi, Nieveen, N., van den Akker, J., & de Lange, J. (2002). Design, evaluating, and implementing an innovative learning environment for supporting mathematics education reform in Indonesia:the CASCADE-IMEI Study. Dalam P. Valero & O. Skovsmose. Prosiding 3rd International Mathematics Education and Society Conference (pp. 1-4). Copenhagen Denmark: Centre for Researh in Learning Mathematics.

Pengajaran dan pembelajaran pendidikan matematik realistik lndonesia (PMRI) di Sekolah Rendah Aceh

Similar Items