Relationship between performance appraisal and employee engagement among administrative staff

Relationship between performance appraisal and employee engagement among administrative staff

The purpose of this study is to determine the relationship between performance appraisal and employee engagement among administrative staff. For this study, the researcher conducts a study in the context of Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM), one of the public universities located in northern area in M...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rosmiza, Ahmad
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
Published: 2015
Subjects:
HF5549-5549.5 Personnel Management
Employment
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/5480/1/s808391_01.pdf.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/5480/2/s808391_02.pdf.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.5480
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
advisor Johari, Husna
topic HF5549-5549.5 Personnel Management
Employment
spellingShingle HF5549-5549.5 Personnel Management
Employment
Rosmiza, Ahmad
Relationship between performance appraisal and employee engagement among administrative staff
description The purpose of this study is to determine the relationship between performance appraisal and employee engagement among administrative staff. For this study, the researcher conducts a study in the context of Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM), one of the public universities located in northern area in Malaysia. Besides, this study also determines the level of engagement among employees in UUM and does performance appraisal system influence employee engagement. A total 400 questionnaires were distributed to the administrative staff in UUM; Three hundred and six (306) usable questionnaires were returned. The data were analysed using Pearson Correlation analysis. The result indicated that the performance appraisal has significant relationship with employee engagement. On the other hand, the result shows the level of engagement among employees in UUM is high. This study shows the positive relationship between these two variables; whereas; when employee’s perception of performance appraisal (pertaining to tool; appraiser; growth and development) is high, the employee engagement among employee also high. This study also shows it is important for organization to ensure that performance appraisal conducted efficiently since it is one of the important areas in human resource management; which also may contribute towards high employee engagement among staff in organization.
format Thesis
qualification_name masters
qualification_level Master's degree
author Rosmiza, Ahmad
author_facet Rosmiza, Ahmad
author_sort Rosmiza, Ahmad
title Relationship between performance appraisal and employee engagement among administrative staff
title_short Relationship between performance appraisal and employee engagement among administrative staff
title_full Relationship between performance appraisal and employee engagement among administrative staff
title_fullStr Relationship between performance appraisal and employee engagement among administrative staff
title_full_unstemmed Relationship between performance appraisal and employee engagement among administrative staff
title_sort relationship between performance appraisal and employee engagement among administrative staff
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business
publishDate 2015
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/5480/1/s808391_01.pdf.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/5480/2/s808391_02.pdf.pdf
_version_ 1747827936824655872
spelling my-uum-etd.54802021-04-05T01:03:35Z Relationship between performance appraisal and employee engagement among administrative staff 2015 Rosmiza, Ahmad Johari, Husna Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business HF5549-5549.5 Personnel Management. Employment The purpose of this study is to determine the relationship between performance appraisal and employee engagement among administrative staff. For this study, the researcher conducts a study in the context of Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM), one of the public universities located in northern area in Malaysia. Besides, this study also determines the level of engagement among employees in UUM and does performance appraisal system influence employee engagement. A total 400 questionnaires were distributed to the administrative staff in UUM; Three hundred and six (306) usable questionnaires were returned. The data were analysed using Pearson Correlation analysis. The result indicated that the performance appraisal has significant relationship with employee engagement. On the other hand, the result shows the level of engagement among employees in UUM is high. This study shows the positive relationship between these two variables; whereas; when employee’s perception of performance appraisal (pertaining to tool; appraiser; growth and development) is high, the employee engagement among employee also high. This study also shows it is important for organization to ensure that performance appraisal conducted efficiently since it is one of the important areas in human resource management; which also may contribute towards high employee engagement among staff in organization. 2015 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/5480/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/5480/1/s808391_01.pdf.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/5480/2/s808391_02.pdf.pdf text eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Abd. Aziz, Y (2003). Performance Appraisal: Issues, Challenge & Prospect. Selangor, Malaysia: Prentice Hall. Ahmad, A.R., Farley, A., & Naidoo, M. (2012). An examination of the implementation federal government strategic plans in Malaysia public universities. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(5), 290-301. Analoui, F., & Fell, P. (2002). Have you been appraised? A survey of the university administrative staff. The International Journal of Education Management, 16(6), 279-287 Anand, P. (2011). Case study on employee engagement and performance appraisal: ITC Maurya. Review of Management, 1(2). Anitha, J. (2013). Determinants of employee engagement and their impact on employee performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 63(3), 308-323. Attridge, M. (2009). Measuring and managing employee work engagement: A review of the research and business literature. Journal of Workplace and Behavioral Health, 24, 383-398. Atchison, A., (2011), Trends in global employee engagement. Aon Hewitt. Avery, D.R., McKay, P.F. and Wilson, D.C. (2007). Engaging the aging workforce: The relationship between perceived age similarity, satisfaction with coworkers, and employee engagement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1542-1556. Bailey, T. (1993). Discretionary effort and the organization of work: Employee participation and work reform since Hawthorne. Working Paper. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. Bekele, A.Z., Shigutu, A. D., & Tensay, A. T. (2014). The effect of employees’ perception of performance appraisal on their work outcomes. International Journal of Management and Commerce Innovations, 2(1), 136-173. Bernadin, H.J. (2010), Human resource management: An experiential approach, (5th ed.), McGraw-Hill International Edition. Bhanagar, J. (2007). Talent management strategy of employee engagement in Indian ITES employees: Key retention. Employee Relation, 29(3), 640-663. Bhatti, K.K., & Qureshi, T.M. (2007). Impact of employee participation on job satisfaction, employee commitment and employee productivity. International Review of Business Research Papers, 3(2), 54-68. Cataldo, P. (2011). Focusing on employee engagement: How to measure it and improve it, UNC Executive Development 2011. Cook, J., & Crossman A. (2004). Satisfaction with performance appraisal systems: a study of role perception. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19(5), 526-541. Danish, R.Q., & Usman, A. (2010). Impact of reward and recognition on job satisfaction and motivation: An empirical study from Pakistan. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(2), 159-167. Davoudi, S. M., & Fartash, K. (2012). Integrating human resource management with firm’s strategy: A key concept to achieve firm’s superior performance. Journal of Economics and Management, 1(2). Drake, T.J. (2012). Assessing employee engagement: A comparison of the job engagement scale and the Utrecht work engagement scale. For Degree of Masters of Science Thesis: Colorado State University. Durecki, C.E., (1996). The Relationship between Teachers’ Perceptions of Performance Appraisal and Job Satisfaction. Wayne State University Detroit, Michigan. Edmonstone, J. (1996). Appraising the state of performance appraisal. Health Manpower Management, 22(6), 9-13. Erdogan, P (2002). Antecedents and consequences of justice perceptions in performance appraisals. Human Resource Management Review, 12(4), 555-578. Gallup, Inc. (2010). Retrived from www.gallup.com. Goffman, E. (1961). Encounters: Two studies in the social of interaction. Oxford England : Bobbs-Merrill. Guest, D. (2014). Employee engagement: A sceptical analysis. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 1(2), 141-156. Gupta, V., & Kumar, S. (2013). Impact of performance appraisal justice on employee engagement: A study of Indian professionals. Employee Relations, 35(1), 61-78. Gruman, J.A. and Saks, A.M. (2011). Performance management and employee engagement. Human Resource Management Review, 21(2), 12-136. Hallberg, U. E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2006). Same same but different? Can work engagement be discrimaneted from job involvement and organizational commitment. European Psychologist, 11(2), 119-127. Jeanmarie, T. M. (2008). The relationship between principals' perceptions of performance appraisal and level of job satisfaction. Desertation/Thesis, UMI Dissertations Publishing. Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal. Karimi, R., Malik, M.I., & Hussain, S. (2011). Examining the relationship of performance appraisal system and employee satisfaction. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(22). Kearney, W.J. (1978). Improving work performance through appraisal. Human Resource Management, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.. Landy, F. J., Barnes, J. L., & Murphy, K. R. (1978, Correlates of perceived fairness and accuracy of performance evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(6), 751-754. Latham, G.P., Almost, J., Mann, S. & Moore, C. (2005). New Developments in Performance Management. Organizational Dynamics, 34(1). 77-87 Latham, G.P., & Wexley, K.N. (1994). Increasing productivity through performance appraisal. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. Lockwood, N. R., (2007). Leveraging employee engagement for competitive advantage: HR’s strategic role. SHRM Research Quarterly. Retrieved from http://www.shrm.org/Research/ Articles/Articles/Documents/07MarResearch Quarterly.pdf. Macey, W. H. & Schneider, B. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1(1), 3-30. Maslach, C., & Leither, M.P. (1997). Multiple roles and role strain: Some notes on human energy, time and commitment. American Sociological Review, 42, 921-936. Mensah, B. F., & Seidu, P.A. (2012) Employees’ perception of performance appraisal system: A case study. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(2), 73–88. Mone, E. M., & London, M., (2010). Employee Engagement Through Effective Performance Management: A Practical Guide For Managers. Routledge, New York. Moriones A. B., Sanchez J.S.G., & Morentin, S. M. (2011). Performance appraisal: Dimensions and determinants. Discussion Paper No. 5623. Murphy, K. R., and Cleveland, J. N. (1995). Undertanding performance appraisal : Social, organization and goal-based persepctives, Sege Publication, Thousand Oaks, CA. Newaz M.T. (2012). The role of performance management system in shaping psychological contract: A case study approach. International Journal of Business and Management Tomorrow. Nzuve, S. N. M., (2007), Management of human resources: A Kenyan Perspective, Nairobi, Basic Modern Management Consultants. Obisi, C., (2011), Employee performance appraisal and its implication for individual and organizational growth. Australian Journal of Business Management Research, 1(9), 92-97. Orpen, C. (1985). The effect of need for achievement and need for independence on the relationship between perceived job attributes and managerial satisfaction and performance. International Journal of Psychology, 20, 15-20. Pettijohn, L.S., Parker, R.S., Pettijohn, C.E., & Kent, J.L. (2001). Performance appraisals: usage, criteria and observations. Journal of Management Development, 20 (9), 754-771. Rich, B. L., Lepine, J. A., & Crowford, E. R. (2010). Job engagement: antecedents and effects on job performance, Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 617-635. Robinson, I. (2006). Human Resource Management in Organisations. London, CIPD Rowland, C. A., & Hall, R.A. (2013). Perceived unfairness in appraisal: engagement and sustainable organization performance. EuroMed Journal of Business, 8(3), 195-208. Rurkkhum, Suthinee. (2010). The relationship between employee engagement and organizational citizenship behaviour in Thai organizations. Retrieved from the University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy, http://purl.umn.edu/100890 Sekaran, U. (2003). Research Methods for business: A skill Building Approach. India: John Willey & Sons Inc. Saks, A.M. (2006). Antecedents and Consequences of Employee Engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600-619. Saks, A.M. (2008). The meaning of bleeding of employee engagement: huw muddy is the water?. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 40-43. Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B., (2010). Defining and measuring work engagement : Bringing clarity to the concept, in Bakker, A. B. & Leither, M.P. (Eds)., Work Engagement : A Handbook of Essential Theory and Research, Psychology Press, Hove, New York. Shamima Ahmad, (1999). The emerging measure of effectiveness for human resource management: An exploratory study with performance appraisal. Journal of Management Development. 18(6), 543-556. Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2009). Research methods for business: A skill building approach (5th ed.) West Sussex; John Wiley & Son. Shuck, B. (2011). Four emerging perspectives of employee engagement: An integrative literature review. Human Resource Development Review, 10(3), 304-328. Smither, J. W., (1998). Lesson learn: research implications for performance appraisal and management practice, in Smither J. W. (Ed.), Performance appraisals : A state of the art in practice, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, 537-547. Theriou, G. N., & Chatzoglou, P., (2013). The impact of best HRM practices on performance – identifying enabling factors. Employee Relations, 36(5), 535-561. Tuytens, M., & Devos, G. (2012). Importance of system and leadership performance appraisal. Personal Review, 41 (6), 756-776. Ulrich, D. (2007). The talent trifecta. Workforce Management, 86, 32-33. Wiese, D. S., & Buckley, M.R. (1998). The evolution of the Performance Appraisal Process. Journal of Management History, 4(3), 233-249. Wellins, R. S., Bernthal, P., & Phelps, M. (2005). Development dimensions International, Pittsburg, P.A. Wildermuth, C. (2008). Engaged to serve: The relationship between employee engagement and the personality of human services professionals and paraprofessionals. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Bowling Green State University. Zikmund, W. G., (1997). Business Research Method (Fifth Edition). United States of America: The Dryden Press.

Similar Items