The relationship between innovation and information technology on organizational performance

Organizational performance is important to the organization. This is because it will be the benchmark to the organization whether the organization achieves their vision and mission or not. In order to ensure the company stay competitive, the organizational performance can be as a determined in order...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Noor Azinuddin, Ahmad
Format:	Thesis
Language:	eng eng
Published:	2015
Subjects:	T58.5-58.64 Information technology
Online Access:	https://etd.uum.edu.my/5492/1/s816306_01.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/5492/2/s816306_02.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-uum-etd.5492
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection	UUM ETD
language	eng eng
advisor	Adnan, Zurina Johari, Johanim
topic	T58.5-58.64 Information technology
spellingShingle	T58.5-58.64 Information technology Noor Azinuddin, Ahmad The relationship between innovation and information technology on organizational performance
description	Organizational performance is important to the organization. This is because it will be the benchmark to the organization whether the organization achieves their vision and mission or not. In order to ensure the company stay competitive, the organizational performance can be as a determined in order to ensure that the organization could be successful in the future. Hence, the purpose of this study is to know the relationship between innovation and information technology on the organizational performance in Malaysian Public Listed Companies. A cross-sectional study was chosen for this study. There are two objectives in this study, first is to evaluate the relationship between innovation with organizational performance in Malaysian Public Listed Companies. Second is to examine the relationship between information technology and organizational performance in Malaysian Public Listed Companies. Data were gathered through the online questionnaire survey of organizations (n=31). A total of 214 questionnaires were distributed to the Malaysian public listed companies by email and only 31 questionnaires were returned for analysis. The data has been analysed by using Statistic Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). Regression results have shown the innovation has no relationship with the organizational performance. Meanwhile, the results indicated that information technology has a significant and positive relationship with organizational performance. The implications of this study is the organization need to use information technology in order to enhance the organizational performance of the company. Besides that, information technology is the important tool to make the work become more effective and at the same time, the company can stay competitive in the market
format	Thesis
qualification_name	masters
qualification_level	Master's degree
author	Noor Azinuddin, Ahmad
author_facet	Noor Azinuddin, Ahmad
author_sort	Noor Azinuddin, Ahmad
title	The relationship between innovation and information technology on organizational performance
title_short	The relationship between innovation and information technology on organizational performance
title_full	The relationship between innovation and information technology on organizational performance
title_fullStr	The relationship between innovation and information technology on organizational performance
title_full_unstemmed	The relationship between innovation and information technology on organizational performance
title_sort	relationship between innovation and information technology on organizational performance
granting_institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department	School of Business Management
publishDate	2015
url	https://etd.uum.edu.my/5492/1/s816306_01.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/5492/2/s816306_02.pdf
_version_	1747827939890692096
spelling	my-uum-etd.54922021-04-04T08:08:20Z The relationship between innovation and information technology on organizational performance 2015 Noor Azinuddin, Ahmad Adnan, Zurina Johari, Johanim School of Business Management College of Business T58.5-58.64 Information technology Organizational performance is important to the organization. This is because it will be the benchmark to the organization whether the organization achieves their vision and mission or not. In order to ensure the company stay competitive, the organizational performance can be as a determined in order to ensure that the organization could be successful in the future. Hence, the purpose of this study is to know the relationship between innovation and information technology on the organizational performance in Malaysian Public Listed Companies. A cross-sectional study was chosen for this study. There are two objectives in this study, first is to evaluate the relationship between innovation with organizational performance in Malaysian Public Listed Companies. Second is to examine the relationship between information technology and organizational performance in Malaysian Public Listed Companies. Data were gathered through the online questionnaire survey of organizations (n=31). A total of 214 questionnaires were distributed to the Malaysian public listed companies by email and only 31 questionnaires were returned for analysis. The data has been analysed by using Statistic Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). Regression results have shown the innovation has no relationship with the organizational performance. Meanwhile, the results indicated that information technology has a significant and positive relationship with organizational performance. The implications of this study is the organization need to use information technology in order to enhance the organizational performance of the company. Besides that, information technology is the important tool to make the work become more effective and at the same time, the company can stay competitive in the market 2015 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/5492/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/5492/1/s816306_01.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/5492/2/s816306_02.pdf text eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Abu-jarad, I. Y., Yusof, N., & Nikbin, D. (2010). A Review Paper on Organizational Culture and Organizational Performance. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 1, 26–46. Aguinis, H. (2004). Regression analysis for categorical moderators. NY: Guilford Anspach, R. R. (1991). Everyday Methods for Assessing Organizational Effectiveness. Social Problems. http://doi.org/10.1525/sp.1991.38.1. 03a00010 Anderson, Mark C., Banker, Rajiv D dan Ravindran Sury, 2003, The New Productivity Paradox Communication of The ACM), March 2003/ Vol. 46, No. 3 Au, C. F. (1996). Rethinking organizational effectiveness: Theoretical and methodological issues in the study of organizational effectiveness for social welfare organizations. Administration in Social Work, 20, 1–&. http://doi.org/10.1300/J147v20n04_01 Al-Zu’bi, H. A. (2010). A study of relationship between organizational justice and job satisfaction. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(12), p102. Aragón-Correa, J. A., García-Morales, V. J., & Cordón-Pozo, E. (2007). Leadership and organizational learning's role on innovation and performance: Lessons from Spain. Industrial marketing management, 36(3), 349-359. Balkin, D. B., Markman, G. D., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2000). Is CEO Pay in high technology firms related to innovation?. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1118-1129. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1556340 Bank Negara Malaysia 2005, Bank Negara Malaysia, viewed 10 April 2005, http://www.bnm.gov.my. Barney, J. B., Ketchen, D. J., & Wright, M. (2011). The future of resource-based theory revitalization or decline?. Journal of management, 37(5), 1299-1315. Barney, J., 1991, Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage, Journal of Management, Vol 17, no. 1 Bates, R. and Khasawneh, S. 2005. “Organizational learning culture, learning transfer climate and perceived innovation in Jordanian organizations, International Journal of Training and Development, Vol. 9, pp. 96–109. Bursamalaysia,. (2014). A Practical Guide to Listing on Bursa Malaysia. Retrieved 14 October 2015, from http://www.bursamalaysia.com/website/ bm/about_us/. Bill Goodwin. (2014). Firm Lack of Technology workforce of the future. Computerweekly.com Retrieved 17 October 2015 http://www.computerweekly.com/news/2240233165/ Firms-lack-technology-forworkforce-of-the- future. Bowen, F. E., Rostami, M., & Steel, P. (2010). Timing is everything: A meta-analysis of the relationships between organizational performance and innovation. Journal of Business Research, 63(11), 1179-1185. Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. (1996). Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Management science, 42(4), 541-558. Brynjolfsson, E. and Yang, S. (1999), “The intangible costs and benefits of computer investments: evidence form the financial markets”, working paper, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MA. Brynjolfsson, Erick, 1993, The Productivity Paradox of Information Technology: Review and Assessment, Communication of ACM, and Japan Management Research Brynjolfsson, E. & Hitt, L. (1995). Information Technology as a Factor of Production: the Role of Differences among Firms, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol. 3: 183-199. doi:10.1080/10438599500000002, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10438599500000002 Bharadwaj, G., Bharadwaj, S. and Konsynski, B. (1999), “Information technology effects on firm performance as measured by Tobin’s q”, Management Science, Vol. 45 No. 6, pp. 1008-24. Brewer, G. A., & Selden, S. C. (2000). Why elephants gallop: Assessing and predicting organizational performance in federal agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 685–712. http://doi.org/Article Bursa Malaysia (19 October 2015). Retrieved from http://www.klse.com.my/website/bm/about_us/the_ organisation/history.html Campbell, J. J., Dunnette, M. D., Lawler, E. E., & Weick, K. E. (1970). Managerial behavior, performance, and effectiveness. Chirani, E., & Tirgar, S. M. (2013). Information technology’s role rn organizations’ performance. Kuwait Chapter of the Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 3(1), 16. Chui Yan, Y. (2010). Perwaja Steel: Case and Instructor's Manual. Cohen J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 2nd ed. Daft,R.L.(2000). Organization Theory and Design. (7th ed.) South-Western College Publishing, Thomson Learning. U.S.A. Daft, R., & Becker, S. (1978). Innovation in Organizations: Innovation Adoption in School Organizations. New York: Elsevier. Damanpour, F. (1992). Organizational Size and Innovation. Organization Studies. http://doi.org/10.1177/017084069201300304 Damanpour, F. (1988). Innovation type, radicalness and the adoption process. Communication Research, 15(5), 545-567. Davis, M. J. (1971). On polar substorms as the source of large‐scale traveling ionospheric disturbances. Journal of Geophysical Research, 76(19), 4525-4533. Dans, Enrique, 2001, IT Investment in Small and Medium Enterprises: Paradoxically Productive?, Electronic Journal of IS Evaluation, Vol. 4, n. 1, Mar. 2001 Devaraj, S., & Kohli, R. (2001). The IT payoff: measuring the business value of information technology investments. Financial Times/Prentice Hall. De Jong, J.P.J & Den Hartog, D. N. (2008). Innovative Work Behavior : Measurement and Validation. Scientific Analysis of Entrepreneurship and SMEs, 1–27. Dobre, O. I. (2013). Employee motivation and organizational performance. Tabel of Contents. Dos Santos, Bryan L., Peffer, Ken., Mauer, David C., 1993, The Impact of Information Technology Investment Announcements on the Market Value of the Firm, Information Systems Research 4 : 1, \|O47-7O47/93/O4OI/0O0l/$O1.25, The Institute of Management Sciences Fernandes, C., & Awamleh, R. (2006). Impact of organisational justice in an expatriate work environment. Management research news, 29(11), 701-712. Gavrea, C., Ilies, L., & Stegerean, R. (2011). Determinants of organizational performance: the case of Romania. Management & Marketing, 6(2), 285. Georgopoulos, B. S., & Tannenbaum, A. S. (1957).A study of organizational effectiveness. American Sociological Review, 534-540. Gopal, S., & Kumar, D. (2011). Strategic Interventions in Tackling Poor Performance of Service Departments: Study on Muhibbah Engineering (M) Bhd, Malaysia. Garcia-Morales, V. J., Matias-Reche, F., & Hurtado-Torres, N. (2008). Influence of transformational leadership on organizational innovation and performance depending on the level of organizational learning in the pharmaceutical sector. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 21(2), 188-212. Greve, H. R. (2003). A behavioral theory Of Rand D Expenditures and innovations: evidence from shipbuilding. Academy of Management Journal, 46(6), 685. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/ 30040661 Gulati, R. (1998). Alliances and networks. Strategic management journal, 19(4), 293-317. Glor, E. D. (2014). Studying the Impact of Innovation on Organizations, Organizational Populations and Organizational Communities: A Framework for Research. The Innovation Journal, 19(3), 1. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (Vol. 6). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall. Hage, J. (1999). Organizational innovation and organizational change. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 597-622. Heffernan, M.,M. & Flood, P.C. (2000). An Exploration of the Relationship between Managerial Competencies Organizational, Characteristic and Performance in an Irish organization. Journal of European Industrial Training. Univerisity Press, p128-136. Hsu, C. C., & Pereira, A. (2008). Internationalization and performance: The moderating effects of organizational learning. [Review]. Omega- International Journal of Management Science, 36(2), 188-205. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2006.06.004 Ho, Shirley J., Mallick, Sushanta K., 2006, The Impact of Information Technology on the Banking Industry: Theory and Empirics, National Chengchi University, Taiwan Jen Huang, C., & Ju Liu, C. (2005). Exploration for the relationship between innovation, IT and performance. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 6(2), 237-252. Kemp, R. G., de Jong, J. P. J., Folkeringa, M., & Wubben, E. F. M. (2003). Innovation and firm performance: Differences between small and medium-sized firms. In Annual International SMS-conference on Intersections: Strategy across Conventional Boundaries, November 10-12, 2003. Kohli, R., & Devaraj, S. (2003). Measuring information technology payoff: A metaanalysis of structural variables in firm-level empirical research.Information systems research, 14(2), 127-145. Kostopoulos, K. C., Spanos, Y. E., & Prastacos, G. P. (2002, May). The resource-based view of the firm and innovation: identification of critical linkages. In European Academy of Management Conference, Stockholm, Sweden. Kim, S. (2005). Individual-level factors and organizational performance in government organizations. Journal of public administration research and theory, 15(2), 245-261. Kraemer, Kenneth L., Dedrick, Jason., 2001, Payoffs From Investment in Information Technology: Lesson From The Asia-Pacific Region, Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations University of California, Irvine Lafley, A. G., & Charan, R. (2008). P&G’s innovation culture. Strategy + Business Magazine, 1-10 Ling, Y. H., & Hong, L. (2010). How intellectual capital management affects organizational performance: Using intellectual capital as the mediating variable. Human Resource Management Student Newspaper, 10(1), 1-17. Lusthaus, C., & Adrien, M. H. (1998). Organizational assessment: A review of experience. Universalia Occasional Paper, 31. Melville, N., Kraemer, K., & Gurbaxani, V. (2004). Review: Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of IT business value. MIS quarterly, 28(2), 283-322. Mousavi, S. S., & BadrAbady, M. H. (2008). The Role of Information Technology in Organizational Procedures' Improvement with Knowledge Based Approach-A Study of the Iranian Taxation Affairs Organization. World Applied Sciences Journal, 3(2), 55-66. Moustaghfir, K., & Schiuma, G. (2013). Knowledge, learning, and innovation: Research and perspectives. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17, 495–510. Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.084880161222&partnerID=40&md5=cbdb77e6fd9c8 e1a557b86283d51144c Mukhopadhyay, T., Kekre, S., & Kalathur, S. (1995). Business value of information technology: a study of electronic data interchange. MIS quarterly, 137-156. Mushure, G. O. N. (2014). Financial Analysis Report: Malaysia Airlines 2007-2011. Nakata, Cheryl; Zhu, Zhen; Kraimer, Maria L., (2008). The complex contribution of information technology capability to business performance, Journal of Managerial Issues. Novak, S., & Stern, S. (2008). How does outsourcing affect performance dynamics? Evidence from the automobile industry. Management Science,54(12), 1963-1979. Oerlemans, L. A. G., Meeus, M. T. H., & Boekema, F. W. M. (1998). Do Networks Matter for Innovation? The usefulness of the economic network approach in analysing innovation. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 89(3), 298-309. Pallant, J. (2013). SPSS survival manual. McGraw-Hill Education (UK). Penrose, E. T. (1959). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm: Oxford University Press. Piaw, C.Y. (2012). Mastering research method. Selangor, Malaysia: Mc Graw Hill. Rasula, Jelena, Vuksic, Vesna Bosilj & Stemberger, M. I. (2012). The Impact of Knowledge Management on Organizational Performance. Economic and Business Review, 14, 147–168. Retrieved from www.ebrjournal.net/ojs/ index.php/ebr/article/download/85/pdf? Raed, Awamleh and Fernandes, Cedwyn. (2006). Impact of Organizational Justice in an Expatriate Work Environment. Management research news, 29, (11), 701-712. Ray, G., Barney, J. B., & Muhanna, W. A. (2004). Capabilities, business processes, and competitive advantage: choosing the dependent variable in empirical tests of the resource‐based view. Strategic management journal, 25(1), 23-37. Ringim, K. J., Razalli, M. R., & Hasnan, N. (2012). The Relationship between Information Technology Capability and Organizational Performance of Nigerian Banks. International Journal of Technology and Management (IJTM), 1(1). Ricardo, R., & Wade, D. (2001). Corporate Performance Management: How to Build a Better Organization Through Measurement Driven Strategies Alignment. Butterworth Heinemann. Richard, P. J., Devinney, T. M., Yip, G. S., & Johnson, G. (2009). Measuring organizational performance: Towards methodological best practice. Journal of management Robey, D., Boudreau, M. C., & Rose, G. M. (2000). Information technology and organizational learning: a review and assessment of research. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 10(2), 125-155. Rosenbusch, N., Brinckmann, J., & Bausch, A. (2011). Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs. Journal of business Venturing, 26(4), 441-457. Saunila, M., Pekkola, S. & Ukko, J. (2014),"The relationship between innovation capability and performance", International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol.63 Iss 2 pp. 234-249 Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A., & Grover, V. (2003). Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS quarterly, 237-263. Schiuma, K., (2013),"Knowledge, learning, and innovation: research and perspectives",Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 17 Iss 4 pp. 495– 510 Scholl, H.J. (2002), “Information and public administration: eGovernment (ETEGV)”, in Sprague, R. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii Conference on System Sciences, IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamos, CA. Sekaran, U., & Bougie. R. (2010). Research methods for business. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley. Sekaran, U. (2006). Research method of business: A skill-building approach. Writing. http://doi.org/http://www.slideshare.net/ basheerahmad/research-methods-forbusiness- entire-ebook-by-uma-sekaran. Sekaran, U. (2003). Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach (4th ed). New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc. Smith, J. (2008). Information Technology's Influence on Productivity. ProQuest. Silva, M. J., Leitão, J., & Raposo, M. L. B. (2007). Barriers to Innovation faced by Manufacturing Firms in Portugal: How to overcome it?. Available at SSRN 1023825. Strassman, P. A. The Business Value of Computers, The Information Economics Press, New Haven, CT, 1990. Strassman, P. A. The Squandered Computer, The Information Economics Press, New Haven, CT, 1997. Solow, R, 1987, “We’d better Watch Out”, New York Times Book Review, July 12, p.36 Tajuddin, M. Z. M., Iberahim, H., & Ismail, N. (2015). Relationship between Innovation and Organizational Performance in Construction Industry in Malaysia. Universal Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 3(4), 87-99. Tabachnick, B.G. and Fidell, L.S. (1996). Using Multivariate Statistics. NY: HarperCollins. Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative science quarterly, 35-67. Venkatesh, V., & Davis F.D. (2000), “A theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model,” Journal of Management Sciences Vol. 2, pp. 186-204. Wernerfelt B. 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 5(2): 171–180. Westrum, R. (2004). A typology of organisational cultures. Quality & Safety in Health Care, 13 Suppl 2, ii22–i27. http://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2003.009522 Wright, R. E., Palmer, J. C., & Perkins, D. (2004). Types of product innovations and small business performance in hostile and benign environments. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 15(2), 33. Yuchtman, E. & Seashore, S. (1967), Factorial Analysis of Organizational Performance", Administrative Science Quarterly 12(3), pp. 377-95 Zaltman, G., Duncan, R., & Holbek, J. (1973). Innovations and Organizations. New York: John Wiley. Zhang, Michael J., (2007) Assessing the performance impacts of information systems from the resource-based perspective: An empirical test of the indirect effect of IS, Journal of Business Strategies, Center for Business and Economic Research.

The relationship between innovation and information technology on organizational performance

Similar Items