Intention of university staf involvement in preventive maintenance programme: An analysis based on theory of planned behavior
The purpose of this study was to prove staff involvement and desire intention tendency for staff involved directly or indirectly in the preventive maintenance programed organize by the organization. In line with previous research, this paper explores the influence to get involved by using the theory...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Thesis |
Language: | eng eng |
Published: |
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://etd.uum.edu.my/5532/1/s811052_01.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/5532/2/s811052_02.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
my-uum-etd.5532 |
---|---|
record_format |
uketd_dc |
institution |
Universiti Utara Malaysia |
collection |
UUM ETD |
language |
eng eng |
advisor |
Mad Lazim, Halim |
topic |
HD58.7 Organizational Behavior. |
spellingShingle |
HD58.7 Organizational Behavior. Masitoh, Abu Hassan Intention of university staf involvement in preventive maintenance programme: An analysis based on theory of planned behavior |
description |
The purpose of this study was to prove staff involvement and desire intention tendency for staff involved directly or indirectly in the preventive maintenance programed organize by the organization. In line with previous research, this paper explores the influence to get involved by using the theory of planned behavior and practice preventive maintenance policy in the workplace. It will prove whether there is influence behavior in preventive maintenance in the organization or not. The results show, to get involved and influence behavior between individual in preventive
maintenance program exists among staff of the University. More than 80 percent (%) of the administrative staff that provide the response programmed of preventive maintenance and want to get involved in the program which was introduced by the University. This decision also shows that there are similarities and positive relationships in each individual behavior towards preventive maintenance program.
Overall, the results are consistent with the preventive maintenance engagement. This study also documented the appropriateness of mechanisms to engage behind the behavior and therefore, it will add to the current knowledge of the existence of behaviors among university staff |
format |
Thesis |
qualification_name |
masters |
qualification_level |
Master's degree |
author |
Masitoh, Abu Hassan |
author_facet |
Masitoh, Abu Hassan |
author_sort |
Masitoh, Abu Hassan |
title |
Intention of university staf involvement in preventive maintenance programme: An analysis based on theory of planned behavior |
title_short |
Intention of university staf involvement in preventive maintenance programme: An analysis based on theory of planned behavior |
title_full |
Intention of university staf involvement in preventive maintenance programme: An analysis based on theory of planned behavior |
title_fullStr |
Intention of university staf involvement in preventive maintenance programme: An analysis based on theory of planned behavior |
title_full_unstemmed |
Intention of university staf involvement in preventive maintenance programme: An analysis based on theory of planned behavior |
title_sort |
intention of university staf involvement in preventive maintenance programme: an analysis based on theory of planned behavior |
granting_institution |
Universiti Utara Malaysia |
granting_department |
School of Business Management |
publishDate |
2015 |
url |
https://etd.uum.edu.my/5532/1/s811052_01.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/5532/2/s811052_02.pdf |
_version_ |
1747827946498818048 |
spelling |
my-uum-etd.55322021-04-04T07:34:37Z Intention of university staf involvement in preventive maintenance programme: An analysis based on theory of planned behavior 2015 Masitoh, Abu Hassan Mad Lazim, Halim School of Business Management School of Business Management HD58.7 Organizational Behavior. The purpose of this study was to prove staff involvement and desire intention tendency for staff involved directly or indirectly in the preventive maintenance programed organize by the organization. In line with previous research, this paper explores the influence to get involved by using the theory of planned behavior and practice preventive maintenance policy in the workplace. It will prove whether there is influence behavior in preventive maintenance in the organization or not. The results show, to get involved and influence behavior between individual in preventive maintenance program exists among staff of the University. More than 80 percent (%) of the administrative staff that provide the response programmed of preventive maintenance and want to get involved in the program which was introduced by the University. This decision also shows that there are similarities and positive relationships in each individual behavior towards preventive maintenance program. Overall, the results are consistent with the preventive maintenance engagement. This study also documented the appropriateness of mechanisms to engage behind the behavior and therefore, it will add to the current knowledge of the existence of behaviors among university staff 2015 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/5532/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/5532/1/s811052_01.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/5532/2/s811052_02.pdf text eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Ahmad, R. And Kamaruddin, S. (2012) A review of condition-based maintenance decision-making, European J. Industrial Engineering, Vol. 6, No. 5, pp.519-541. Ajzen, I. (2011). The theory of planned behavior: Reactions and reflections. Psychology & Health, 26 (9), 1113-1127. Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 1-20. Ajzen, I. (2001), ‘‘Nature and operation of attitudes’’, Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 52, pp. 27-58. Ajzen, I. (1991), ‘‘The theory of planned behaviour’’, Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 50, pp. 179-211. Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, personality and behavior. Chicago: Dorsey Press. Allen, R.E., Lucero, M.A. and Van Norman, K.L. (1997), ‘‘An examination of the individual’s decision to participate in an employee involvement programme’’, Group and Organisation Management, Vol. 22, pp. 117-43. Allen, R.E. and Van Norman, K.L. (1996), ‘‘Employee involvement programmes: the noninvolvement of unions revisited’’, Journal of Labour Research, Vol. 17, pp. 479-96. Armitage, C.J. and O’Malley, P. (2001), ‘‘Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: a metaanalytic review’’, British Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 40, pp. 471-99. Bandura, A. (1977, March). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. Bargh, J. A. (1990). Auto-motives: Preconscious determinants of social interaction. In E. T. Higgins & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior. New York: Guilford Press. Barling, J., Fullagar, C. and Kelloway, E. K. 1992. The Union and Its Members: A Psychological Approach. New York: Oxford University Press. Bungum, T. J., Orsak, K. C., & Chng, C. L. (1997). Factors affecting exercise adherence at a worksite wellness program. American Journal of Health Behavior, 21(1), 60. Campbell, J.D. And Jardine, A.K.S. (2001), “Maintenance Excellence Optimizing Life-cycle Decisions “, Maxwell Dekker, New York, USA. Coetzee J.L. 1999. A holistic approach to the maintenance problem. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 55 Cooke, R., & French, D. P. (2011). The role of context and timeframe in moderating relation-ships within the theory of planned behaviour. Psychology and Health, 26, 1225–1240 Dekker, R. (1996). Applications of maintenance optimization models: A review and analysis. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 51 Drennan, F. S., Ramsay, J. D., & Richey, D. (2006). Integrating employee safety and fitness: A model for meeting NIOSH's steps to a healthier U.S. workforce challenge. Professional Safety, 51(1), 26-35. Field, A. P. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS (2nd edition). London: Sage Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York: Psychology Press (Taylor & Francis). Gates, D. M, & Brehm, B. J. (2010). Challenges of a worksite health promotion project. AAOHN Journal Glew, D.J., O’Leary-Kelly, A.M., Griffin, R.W. and Van Fleet, D.D. (1995), ‘‘Participation in organisations: a preview of the issues and proposed framework for future analysis’’, Journal of Management. Grawitch, M. J., Gottschalk, M., & Munz, D. C. (2006). The path to a healthy workplace: A critical review linking healthy workplace practices, employee well-being, and organizational improvements. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 58(3), 129-147. Hair, J.F.J., Black, W.C., Babin, B. J., and Anderson, R.E (2010), Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education International. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Haines, D. J., Davis, L., Rancour, P., Robinson, M., & Al, E. (2007). A pilot intervention to promote walking and wellness and to improve the health of college faculty and staff. Journal of American College Health, 55(4), 219-225. Hankins, M., French, D., & Horne, R. (2000). Statistical guidelines for studies of the theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behavior. Psychology & Health, 15(2), 151-162. Henke, R. M., Goetzel, R. Z., McHugh, J., & Isaac, F. (2011). Recent experience in health promotion at Johnson & Johnson: Lower health spending, strong return on investment. Health Affairs, 30(3), 490-499. Lofsten, H., (1999), Management of industrial maintenance – economic evaluation of maintenance policies. International Journal of Operation & Production Management. MacDuffie, J.P., Hunter, L.W. and Doucet, L. (1996), ‘‘What does transformation mean to workers? the effects of the new industrial relations on union employees’ attitudes’’, paper presented at the IRRA, San Francisco, CA. McLean Parks, J., Gallagher, D. G. and Fullagar, C. 1995. Operationalizing the outcomes of union commitment: The dimensionality of participation. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 16: 533-555 McShane, S. L. 1986a. A path-analytic study of participation in union administration. Industrial Relations, 25: 72-80. Miyoshi A. 1989. Preventive maintenance. In TPM Development Program: Implementing Total Productive Maintenance, Nakajima S (ed.). Productivity Press: Portland, OR; 85–164. Nakajima S. 1989. An introduction to TPM. In TPM Development Program: Implementing Total Productive Maintenance, Nakajima S (ed.). Productivity Press: Portland, Nakajima S. (1988). Introduction to Total Productive Maintenance (TPM). Productivity Press: Portland. Nohammer, E., Schusterschitz, C., & Stummer, H. (2010). Determinants of employee participation in workplace health promotion. International Journal of Workplace Health Management, 3(2), 97-110. Sekaran, U. 1992. Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: 1-427 Online Resources Universiti Utara Malaysia, History of Universiti Utara Malaysia http://uum.edu.my/index.php/en/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principal_ component_analysis http://data-mining-tutorials.blogspot.fr/2009/ 04/principal-component-analysispca.html http://peoplelearn.homestead.com/Topic20-FACTOR analysis3a.html http://www.sagepub.co.uk/field/multiplechoice. html |