An automated software team formation based Belbin team role using fuzzy technique

In software engineering (SE), team plays an important role in determining the project success. To ensure the optimal outcome of the project the team is working on, it is essential to ensure that the team comprises of the members with right characteristics. In a team assigning the right role to each...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Abdulrahman, Bikhtiyar Hasan
Format:	Thesis
Language:	eng eng
Published:	2016
Subjects:	T58.6-58.62 Management information systems QA76 Computer software
Online Access:	https://etd.uum.edu.my/5631/1/s815055_01.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/5631/2/s815055_02.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-uum-etd.5631
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection	UUM ETD
language	eng eng
advisor	Omar, Mazni
topic	T58.6-58.62 Management information systems QA76 Computer software
spellingShingle	T58.6-58.62 Management information systems QA76 Computer software Abdulrahman, Bikhtiyar Hasan An automated software team formation based Belbin team role using fuzzy technique
description	In software engineering (SE), team plays an important role in determining the project success. To ensure the optimal outcome of the project the team is working on, it is essential to ensure that the team comprises of the members with right characteristics. In a team assigning the right role to each team member in order to make certain that the most appropriate individuals are chosen for specific tasks and their efforts contribute maximum to the overall team performance. One of the prevalent team roles is Belbin team role. Belbin developed this theory for formation a successful team. This theory is centered on the team roles and how they should be matched in order to avoid conflicts and build sound teams that are optimally managed. Therefore, the main aim of this study is to develop an automated software team formation method based on Belbin Team Role by using a Fuzzy technique. Fuzzy technique was chosen because it allows analyzing of imprecise data and classifying selected criteria. In this study, two roles in Belbin Team role, which are Shaper (Sh) and Plant (Pl) were chosen to assign the specific role in software team – team leader and programmer, respectively. These roles were chosen because the combination of these roles is able to determine effective team members in SE team. The proposed automated software team formation was then evaluated using an expert review. The participants consist of 12 software developers from Asiacell Telecommunication Company in Kurdistan Region Government of Iraq (KRG). The results demonstrate that the method is useful to be used for forming SE team in industrial setting. The proposed automated software team formation can serve as a useful tool for managers when assigning new team members to a software project. In addition, by using the proposed method, it can help decision makers specifically managers to form effective and equal teams. Effective and equal teams can have an equal chance to experience good team work and thus, to be a successful team.
format	Thesis
qualification_name	masters
qualification_level	Master's degree
author	Abdulrahman, Bikhtiyar Hasan
author_facet	Abdulrahman, Bikhtiyar Hasan
author_sort	Abdulrahman, Bikhtiyar Hasan
title	An automated software team formation based Belbin team role using fuzzy technique
title_short	An automated software team formation based Belbin team role using fuzzy technique
title_full	An automated software team formation based Belbin team role using fuzzy technique
title_fullStr	An automated software team formation based Belbin team role using fuzzy technique
title_full_unstemmed	An automated software team formation based Belbin team role using fuzzy technique
title_sort	automated software team formation based belbin team role using fuzzy technique
granting_institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department	Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts & Sciences
publishDate	2016
url	https://etd.uum.edu.my/5631/1/s815055_01.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/5631/2/s815055_02.pdf
_version_	1747827960813977600
spelling	my-uum-etd.56312021-04-05T01:36:44Z An automated software team formation based Belbin team role using fuzzy technique 2016 Abdulrahman, Bikhtiyar Hasan Omar, Mazni Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts & Sciences Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts and Sciences T58.6-58.62 Management information systems QA76 Computer software In software engineering (SE), team plays an important role in determining the project success. To ensure the optimal outcome of the project the team is working on, it is essential to ensure that the team comprises of the members with right characteristics. In a team assigning the right role to each team member in order to make certain that the most appropriate individuals are chosen for specific tasks and their efforts contribute maximum to the overall team performance. One of the prevalent team roles is Belbin team role. Belbin developed this theory for formation a successful team. This theory is centered on the team roles and how they should be matched in order to avoid conflicts and build sound teams that are optimally managed. Therefore, the main aim of this study is to develop an automated software team formation method based on Belbin Team Role by using a Fuzzy technique. Fuzzy technique was chosen because it allows analyzing of imprecise data and classifying selected criteria. In this study, two roles in Belbin Team role, which are Shaper (Sh) and Plant (Pl) were chosen to assign the specific role in software team – team leader and programmer, respectively. These roles were chosen because the combination of these roles is able to determine effective team members in SE team. The proposed automated software team formation was then evaluated using an expert review. The participants consist of 12 software developers from Asiacell Telecommunication Company in Kurdistan Region Government of Iraq (KRG). The results demonstrate that the method is useful to be used for forming SE team in industrial setting. The proposed automated software team formation can serve as a useful tool for managers when assigning new team members to a software project. In addition, by using the proposed method, it can help decision makers specifically managers to form effective and equal teams. Effective and equal teams can have an equal chance to experience good team work and thus, to be a successful team. 2016 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/5631/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/5631/1/s815055_01.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/5631/2/s815055_02.pdf text eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Ahmed, S., & Doski, M. (2014). The effect of initial public offering on company performance :A case study on Asia Cell in Kurdistan Region. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 5(18), 103–117. Ahn, J., DeAngelis, D., & Barber, S. (2008). Attitude driven team formation using multi-dimensional trust. Proceedings of the IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology, IAT 2007, 229–235. http://doi.org/10.1109/IAT.2007.77 Albanese, R. (1994). Team-building process: key to better project results. Journal of Management in Engineering, 10(6), 36–44. Andrew, D. P. S., Pedersen, P. M., & McEvoy, C. D. (2011). Research methods and design in sport management. Human Kinetics. Aritzeta, A., Swailes, S., & Senior, B. (2007). Belbin’s team role model: Development, validity and applications for team building. Journal of Management Studies, 44(January), 96–118. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00666.x Aritzeta, S. S. and B. S. (2005). Team roles: psychometric evidence, construct validity and team building. ISBN, 1–39. http://doi.org/ISBN: 1-90203 452-X Balmat, J.-F., Lafont, F., Maifret, R., & Pessel, N. (2011). A decision-making system to maritime risk assessment. Ocean Engineering, 38(1), 171–176. Belbin. (2012). "Frequently asked questions. Belbin UK, 1–2. Retrieved from http://www.belbin.com Belbin. (2013a). How to use Belbin team role reports to form a team. Belbin UK. Retrieved from http://www.belbin.com Belbin. (2013b). Self-Perception Inventory Self-Perception Inventory, 1–4. Retrieved from http://www.belbin.com Belbin. (2014). A comprehensive review of Belbin team roles. Belbin UK, 1–26. Retrieved from http://www.belbin.com/content Beranek, G., Zuser, W., & Grechenig, T. (2005). Functional group roles in software engineering teams. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 30(4), 1. http://doi.org/10.1145/1082983.1083108 Botha, W. (1994). n Ondersoek na die verband tussen die Myers-Briggs type indicator en Belbin se indeling van spanrolle. Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University. Bradley, J. H., & Hebert, F. J. (1997). The effect of personality type on team performance. Journal of Management Development, 16(5), 337– 353. http://doi.org/10.1108/02621719710174525 Cann, R. Van, Jansen, S., & Brinkkemper, S. (2012). Team composition in distributed software development. Universiteit Utrecht, (2005). Chen, E. K. (2003). Fuzzy logic routing in opnet tm 9.0 tm final project. High Performance Network. Cheng, X. Y., & Leung, T. P. (2001). Decentralized tracking for a class of interconnected nonlinear systems using fuzzy variable structure control with application to a drill and dry jet mixing machine. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control, 23(2), 102–126. http://doi.org/10.1191/014233101678575539 Clutterbuck, D. (2006). Coaching the Team at Work. Nicholas Brealey Publishing. Deibel, K. (2005). Team formation methods for increasing interaction during in-class group work. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 37, 291–295. http://doi.org/10.1145/1151954.1067525 Ebert, C., & Neve, P. De. (2001). Surviving global software development. IEEE Software, 18(April). http://doi.org/10.1109/52.914748 Eclipse. (2009). Effective teamwork: A best practice guide for the construction industry. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/21970080 Elizabeth Yeh, Charlene Smith, C. J. & N. C. (2006). Team performance management : An international journal article. Emerald. Ezziane, Z., Maruthappu, M., Gawn, L., Thompson, E. a., Athanasiou, T., & Warren, O. J. (2012). Building effective clinical teams in healthcare. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 26, 428–436. http://doi.org/10.1108/14777261211251508 Fatahi, S., & Lorestani, a R. (2010). Design and Implementation of the Expert System for Balancing Team Formation on the Basis of Belbin Team Role. Engineering, I. Fisher, B. A. (1970). Decision emergence: Phases in group decision making. Communications Monographs, 37(1), 53–66. Gibson, J. L. E. A. (2009). Organizations: Behavior, structure, processes. (14th ed.). Irwin: ISBN. Gilley, J. W., Morris, M. L., Waite, a. M., Coates, T., & Veliquette, A. (2010). Integrated theoretical model for building effective teams. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 12, 7–28. http://doi.org/10.1177/1523422310365309 Gondal, A. M., & Khan, A. (2008). Impact of team empowerment on team performance - case of the telecommunications industry in Islamabad. International Review of Business Research Papers, 4(5), 138–146. Hamilton, S. S. (2010). Optimizing team selection for educational group projects. United States Military Academy at West Point. Retrieved from http://www.usma.edu/cfe/ literature/hamilton_10.pdf Harris, D. P. & H. (1999). Team role balance and team performance: an empirical study. Journal of Management Development. Henry, S. M., & Todd Stevens, K. (1999). Using Belbin’s leadership role to improve team effectiveness: An empirical investigation. Journal of Systems and Software, 44(3), 241–250. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0164-1212(98) 10060-2 Hongyun, Y., Xiaohong, B., & Shunkun, Y. (2009). Research and improvement of team software process. 2009 WRI World Congress on Computer Science and Information Engineering, CSIE 2009, 7, 654–658. http://doi.org/10.1109/ CSIE.2009.911 Humphrey, S. E., Morgeson, F. P., & Mannor, M. J. (2009). Developing a theory of the strategic core of teams: a role composition model of team performance. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 48–61. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0012997 İç, Y. T. (2012). An experimental design approach using TOPSIS method for the selection of computer-integrated manufacturing technologies. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 28(2), 245–256. Johnson, S. D., Suriya, C., Won Yoon, S., Berrett, J., & Lafleur, J. (2002). Team development and group processes of virtual learning teams. Computers & Education, 39, 379–393. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(02) 00074-X Kingori, C. (2011). Usability Study of an Internet. Turku Univerisitty of Applied Sciences,. Koksal, C., & Ozmutaf, N. (2009). Using Analytic Hierarchy Process for selecting appropriate host country to study English language abroad. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 1(1), 37–46. Konidari, P., & Mavrakis, D. (2007). A multi-criteria evaluation method for climate change mitigation policy instruments. Energy Policy, 35(12), 6235–6257. Kozanoglu, O., & Fahri, A. (2009). A goal programming model for optimizing team composition. Istanbul Kultur Universitesi, 1–25. Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S. (2001). Work Groups and Teams in Organizations Work Groups and Teams in Organizations. ILR Collection, (2003), 1–70. Kr.Misra, S., & Ray, A. (2012). Software developer selection: A holistic approach for an eclectic decision. International Journal of Computer Applications, 47(1), 12–18. http://doi.org/10.5120/7151-9855 Lavrakads, P. J. (2008). Encyclopedia of survey research methods sampling. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Layton, R. A., Loughry, M. L., Ohland, M. W., & Ricco, G. D. (2010). Design and validation of a web-based system for assigning members to teams using instructorspecified criteria. Advances in Engineering Education, 2(1), 1–28. Lewis, J. R. (1995). IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: Psychometric evaluation and instructions for use. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 7(1), 57–78. http://doi.org/10.1080/10447319509526110 Licorish, S., Philpott, A., & MacDonell, S. G. (2009). Supporting agile team composition: A prototype tool for identifying personality (in) compatibilities. In Proceedings of the 2009 ICSE Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects on Software Engineering (pp. 66–73). IEEE Computer Society. Linberg, K. R. (1999). Software developer perceptions about software project failure: A case study. Journal of Systems and Software, 49, 177–192. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0164-1212(99)00094-1 Lipnack, J. (1997). Virtual teams: Reaching across space, time, and organizations with technology. Jeffrey Stamps. Liu, S., Joy, M., & Griffiths, N. (2013). An exploratory study on group formation based on learning styles. 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 95–99. http://doi.org/10.1109/ ICALT.2013.32 Marcolino, L. S., Jiang, A. X., & Tambe, M. (2013). Multi agent team formation: diversity beats strength. IJCAI International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 279–285. Margerison, C. J., & McCann, D. (1990). Team management: Practical new approaches. Mercury Books. Mathworks, C. (2014). Fuzzy Logic Toolbox TM User ’ s Guide R 2014 b. Math Works, Inc. Mathworks, C. (2015). Fuzzy Logic Toolbox TM User ’ s Guide R 2015 b. The MathWorks, Inc. Miao, S., Hammell II, R. J., Hanratty, T., & Tang, Z. (2013). Comparison of Fuzzy Membership Functions for Value of Information Determination. Mujkanovic, A., Lowe, D., Guetl, C., & Kostulski, T. (2011). An architecture for automated group formation within remote laboratories. REV 2011: 8th International Conference on Remote Enginering and Virtual Instrumentation, 91–100. Mukherjee, K., & Bera, A. (1995). Application of goal programming in project selection decision—A case study from the Indian coal mining industry. European Journal of Operational Research, 82(1), 18–25. Na, K.-S., Simpson, J. T., Li, X., Singh, T., & Kim, K.-Y. (2007). Software development risk and project performance measurement: Evidence in Korea. Journal of Systems and Software, 80, 596–605. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2006.06. 018 Nielsen, J. (2000). Why you only need to test with 5 users. Retrieved March 21, 2015, from http://www.nngroup.com/articles/ O’Doherty, D. M. (2005). Working as part of a balanced team. International Journal of Engineering Education, 21(1), 113–120. Oakley, B., Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2004). Turning student groups in to effective teams. Team Formation Methods for Increasing Interaction During In-Class Group Work, 2(1), 9–34. Omar, M., Syed-Abdullah, S.-L., & Hussin, N. M. (2012). A rule-based team performance prediction model prototype. Procedia Technology, 1, 390–394. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2012.02.089 Ounnas, A., Davis, H. C., & Millard, D. E. (2007). Towards semantic group formation. Proceedings of The 7th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2007, 825–827. http://doi.org/10.1109/ ICALT.2007.268 Ounnas, A., Davis, H., & Millard, D. (2008). A Framework for Semantic Group Formation. 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 6–10. http://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2008.226 Ounnas, A., Davis, H., & Millard, D. (2009). A Framework for Semantic Group Formation in Education. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 43–55. http://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2008.226 Partington, D., & Harris, H. (1999). Team role balance and team performance: an empirical study. Emerald, 18(8), 694–705. Peffers, K. E. N., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. a, & Chatterjee, S. (2007). A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(3), 45–77. http://doi.org/10.2307/ 40398896 Poole, M. S., & Roth, J. (1989). Decision development in small groups IV a typology of group decision paths. Human Communication Research, 15(3), 323–356. Prescott, D., & El-sakran, T. M. (2014). The role of educational videos in the acquisition of teamwork repair strategies. International Journal of Pedagogical Innovations, 2(2). Qin, X.-S., Huang, G. H., Chakma, A., Nie, X. H., & Lin, Q. G. (2008). A MCDMbased expert system for climate-change impact assessment and adaptation planning–a case study for the Georgia Basin, Canada. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(3), 2164–2179. Qureshi, M. R. J., Alshamat, S. A., & Sabir, F. (2014). Significance of the teamwork in agile software engineering. Lahore Leads University, 26(1), 117–120. Rajendran, M. (2005). Analysis of team effectiveness in software development teams working on hardware and software environments using Belbin Self-perception Inventory. Emerald. Ralph, P., & Kelly, P. (2014). The dimensions of software engineering success. Icse, 24–35. http://doi.org/10.1145/2568225.2568261 Raymond, M. B. (2010). Method, Reliability & Validity, Statistics & Research: A Comprehensive Review of Belbin Team Roles. Belbin UK, 28. Retrieved from http://www.belbin.com/content/page/4432/BELBIN-MRVSRAComprehensiveReview-Mar2010.pdf Rodjito, P. (2006). Position tracking and motion prediction using Fuzzy Logic. Colby College. Ryu, Y. S. (2005). Development of usability questionnaires for electronic mobile products and decision making methods. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering. State University, Blacksburg, Virginia. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct= true&db=psyh&AN=2005-99022-267&site=ehost-live Saeed, M., & Trab, A. (2012). Software Engineering : Testing Real-Time Embedded Systems Using Timed Automata Based Approaches. Brunel University. Schoenhoff, P. K. (2001). Belbin’s company worker, the self-perception inventory, and their application to software engineering teams by Belbin’s company worker. Engineering. State University. Senaratne, S., & Gunawardane, S. (2013). Application of team role theory to construction design teams. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 11(1), 1–20. http://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2013.802980 Senior, B. (1997). Team roles and team performance: is there “really”a link? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 70(3), 241–258. Senior, B. (2005). Construct Validity and Team Building. ISBN, (August), 1–39. http://doi.org/ISBN: 1-90203 452-X Sinclair, a. (1992). The tyranny of a team ideology. Organization Studies, 13(4), 611– 626. http://doi.org/10.1177/017084069201300405 Smith, M., Polglase, G., & Parry, C. (2012). Construction of student groups using Belbin: Supporting group work in environmental management. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 36(June 2012), 585–601. http://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2012.692156 Sommerville, J., & Dalziel, S. (1998). Project teambuilding—the applicability of Belbin’s team-role self-perception inventory. International Journal of Project Management, 16(3), 165–171. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0263- 7863(97)00054-9 Spiegel, J., & Torres, C. (1994). Manager’s official guide to team working. Pfeiffer. Strnad, D., & Guid, N. (2010). A fuzzy-genetic decision support system for project team formation. Applied Soft Computing Journal, 10(4), 1178–1187. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2009.08.032 Sudhakar, G. P., Farooq, A., & Patnaik, S. (2011). Soft factors affecting the performance of software development teams. Team Performance Management, 17, 187–205. http://doi.org/10.1108/13527591111143718 Syed-Abdullah, S. L., Omar, M., & Idris, M. F. I. M. (2011). Team achievements equality using fuzzy rule-based technique. World Applied Sciences Journal, 15(3), 359–363. Tavana, M., Azizi, F., Azizi, F., & Behzadian, M. (2013). A fuzzy inference system with application to player selection and team formation in multi-player sports. Sport Management Review, 16(1), 97–110. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2012.06.002 Thanassoulis, E., Kortelainen, M., & Allen, R. (2012). Improving envelopment in data envelopment analysis under variable returns to scale. European Journal of Operational Research, 218(1), 175–185. Todd Jr, S. K., Henry, S., Kafura, D. G., Smith, E. P., Lewis, J. a, Matheson, L., & Rosson, M. B. (1998). The effects of roles and personality characteristics on software development team effectiveness. Computer Science. Trendowicz, A., Ochs, M., & Wickenkamp, A. (2008). Integrating human judgment and data analysis to identify factors influencing software development productivity. EInformatica, 2(1). Tseng, H., Wang, C., Ku, H.-Y., & Sun, L. (2009). Key factors in online collaboration and their relationship to teamwork satisfaction. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 10(2). Tseng, T.-L. (Bill), Huang, C.-C., Chu, H.-W., & Gung, R. R. (2004). Novel approach to multi-functional project team formation. International Journal of Project Management, 22, 147–159. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863 (03)00058-9 Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63(6), 384–399. http://doi.org/10.1037/h0022100 Tullis, T. S., & Stetson, J. N. (2004). A Comparison of Questionnaires for Assessing Website Usability ABSTRACT : Introduction. Usability Professional Association Conference, 1–12. Retrieved from http://home.comcast.net/~tomtullis/publications/ UPA2004TullisStetson.pdf Van, D. L. (1999). The Application of Belbins Team Role Theory in Information Service Enterprises. RAND AFRIKAANS UNIVERSITY. Varun, V., Govindarajan, B., & Nayak, S. (2012). Speed Control of Induction Motor using Fuzzy Logic approach. National Institute of Technology - Rourkela. Retrieved from http://ethesis.nitrkl.ac.in/3278/ Velasquez, M., & Hester, P. T. (2013). An Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods. International Journal of Operations Research, 10(2), 56–66. Venkatamuni, T., & Rao, A. (2010). Reduction of product development time by team formation method in lean manufacturing. Indian Journal of Science & Technology, 3(5), 578–582. Viitanen, J., Hyppönen, H., Lääveri, T., Vänskä, J., Reponen, J., & Winblad, I. (2011). National questionnaire study on clinical ICT systems proofs: Physicians suffer from poor usability. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 80(10), 708–725. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.06.010 Wang, Y.-M., Greatbanks, R., & Yang, J.-B. (2005). Interval efficiency assessment using data envelopment analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 153(3), 347–370. Wasiak, J., & Newnes, L. (2008). Guiding team selection and the use of the Belbin approach. DS 48: Proceeding, 1113–1120. Retrieved from http://www.designsociety.org/publication/26809/ guiding_team_selection_and_the_use_of_the_ belbin_approach West, M. A. (2012). Effective Teamwor: Practical lesson from organizational research (third Edit). Whichard, J., & Kees, N. L. (2006). The manager as facilitator. Greenwood Publishing Group. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research design and methods. Applied Social Research Methods Seiries (Fourth Edi, Vol. 5). Young, V. R. (1993). The application of fuzzy to group health underwriting. Transformation of Society of Actuaries, 45, 551–590. Zaidah, Z., & Zainal, Z. (2007). Case study as a research method. Jurnal Kemanusiaan, 9 (Journal Article), 1–6. http://doi.org/10.1177/15222302004003007 Zarzu, C. (2011). Team composition and team performance : Achieving higher quality results in an international higher education environment. Knowledge Managment & Innovation, 1321–1328. Zhao, J., & Bose, B. K. (2002). Evaluation of membership functions for fuzzy logic controlled induction motor drive. In IECON 02 [Industrial Electronics Society, IEEE 2002 28th Annual Conference of the] (Vol. 1, pp. 229–234). IEEE.

An automated software team formation based Belbin team role using fuzzy technique

Similar Items