Environmental sustainability strategies and impacts: A case study in Northport, Klang Malaysia

Environmental sustainability, a focal point for the government of Malaysia, is also important in developing business sustainability for businesses including ports. Following this, the research objectives of this study were threefold: 1) investigating the impact of strategies implemented by Northpor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Muhammad Nasrullah, Mohd Gapar
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
Published: 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/5674/1/s813187_01.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/5674/2/s813187_02.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.5674
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
advisor Yaakub, Sabariah
topic GE Environmental Sciences
spellingShingle GE Environmental Sciences
Muhammad Nasrullah, Mohd Gapar
Environmental sustainability strategies and impacts: A case study in Northport, Klang Malaysia
description Environmental sustainability, a focal point for the government of Malaysia, is also important in developing business sustainability for businesses including ports. Following this, the research objectives of this study were threefold: 1) investigating the impact of strategies implemented by Northport, Klang in order to be environmentally sustainable, 2) ascertaining the priorities of these strategies and 3) determining the barriers or challenges faced by the port in its efforts of implementing the strategies. Using qualitative research design, data was collected through semistructured interview with the officers in charge of environment at the Northport, Klang, Malaysia. Findings indicate that strategies implemented by the port have been successful in their efforts to reduce emission and improve air quality, a big step in being environmentally sustainable. Several criteria were used to prioritize the strategies, chief among them being implementation cost and time, maintenance cost and reduction of carbon emission. In terms of priority, the first strategy was operational strategy in terms of vessel speed reduction initiative, followed by infrastructure and equipment strategy with equipment and engine replacement and emission control technology and lastly, image improvement strategy with the initiative of the implementation of green building. The biggest barrier in implementing these strategies was cost.
format Thesis
qualification_name masters
qualification_level Master's degree
author Muhammad Nasrullah, Mohd Gapar
author_facet Muhammad Nasrullah, Mohd Gapar
author_sort Muhammad Nasrullah, Mohd Gapar
title Environmental sustainability strategies and impacts: A case study in Northport, Klang Malaysia
title_short Environmental sustainability strategies and impacts: A case study in Northport, Klang Malaysia
title_full Environmental sustainability strategies and impacts: A case study in Northport, Klang Malaysia
title_fullStr Environmental sustainability strategies and impacts: A case study in Northport, Klang Malaysia
title_full_unstemmed Environmental sustainability strategies and impacts: A case study in Northport, Klang Malaysia
title_sort environmental sustainability strategies and impacts: a case study in northport, klang malaysia
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department Ghazali Shafie Graduate School of Government
publishDate 2015
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/5674/1/s813187_01.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/5674/2/s813187_02.pdf
_version_ 1747827966406033408
spelling my-uum-etd.56742021-04-04T07:55:37Z Environmental sustainability strategies and impacts: A case study in Northport, Klang Malaysia 2015 Muhammad Nasrullah, Mohd Gapar Yaakub, Sabariah Ghazali Shafie Graduate School of Government Ghazali Shafie Graduate School of Government GE Environmental Sciences Environmental sustainability, a focal point for the government of Malaysia, is also important in developing business sustainability for businesses including ports. Following this, the research objectives of this study were threefold: 1) investigating the impact of strategies implemented by Northport, Klang in order to be environmentally sustainable, 2) ascertaining the priorities of these strategies and 3) determining the barriers or challenges faced by the port in its efforts of implementing the strategies. Using qualitative research design, data was collected through semistructured interview with the officers in charge of environment at the Northport, Klang, Malaysia. Findings indicate that strategies implemented by the port have been successful in their efforts to reduce emission and improve air quality, a big step in being environmentally sustainable. Several criteria were used to prioritize the strategies, chief among them being implementation cost and time, maintenance cost and reduction of carbon emission. In terms of priority, the first strategy was operational strategy in terms of vessel speed reduction initiative, followed by infrastructure and equipment strategy with equipment and engine replacement and emission control technology and lastly, image improvement strategy with the initiative of the implementation of green building. The biggest barrier in implementing these strategies was cost. 2015 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/5674/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/5674/1/s813187_01.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/5674/2/s813187_02.pdf text eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Books: Noraini Idris (2010). Penyelidikan dalam penyelidikan. McGraw-Hill: Malaysia. Ranjit Kumar (2013). Research methodology: A step by step guide for beginners. 3rd edition Sage publication, New Delhi, India. Journals: Anderson, B and Carlock, M. (2010). Carbon footprinting for ports: Guidance document. World Port Climate Inititative. Starcrest Consulting Group, LLC. Bailey, D and Solomon, G. (2004). Pollution prevention at ports: Clearing the air. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 24 (2004),749–774. Bailey, D. et al. (2004). Harboring pollution: The dirty truth about U.S. ports. The Natural Resources Defence Council. Balkanski, Y. et al. (2010). Direct radiative effect of aerosols emitted by transport: From road, shipping and aviation. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. 10. 4477-4489. Biona, J.B.M. (2013). A look at sea vessel emissions. Center for Engineering and Sustainable Development (CESDR) De La Salle University, Philippines. Breitling, U. (2010). Sustainable shipping and port development. Sustainable Port Development in the ASEAN Region. ASEAN – German Technical Cooperation. Cannon, J. S. (2009). Container Ports and Air Pollution. Energy Futures, Inc. Study. Cannon, J. S. (2009). U.S. container ports and air pollution: A perfect strom. An Energy Future, Inc. Study. Carter, C. and Rogers, D.S. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: Moving towards new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistic Management. 38 (5), 360-387. Corbett, J. J. and Koehler, W. H. (2003). Updated emissions from ocean shipping. Journal of Geophysical Research. 108 (D20), 4650. Corbett, J. J. et al. (1999). Global nitrogen and sulfur inventories for oceangoing ships. Journal of Geophysical Research. 104 (D3), 3457-3470. Corbett, J.J. (2004). Verification of ship emission estimates with monitoring measurements to improve inventory and modeling. The California Air Resources Board and the California Environmental Protection Agency Cross, J. M. (2010). Shore based power: Reducing idle ships’ emissions. Moving beyond status quo. Climate Alert. 20 (2). Cullinane et al. (2002). A stochastic frontier model of the efficiency of major container terminals in Asia: Assessing the influences of administrative and ownership structures. Transportation Research PARTA.36, 743-762. Dillard, J. et al. (2009). Underestanding the social dimension of sustainability. New York, Routledge. 1-12. Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the sustainable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. Calif. Manage. Rev. 36, 90-100. Evirgen, F. and Kilic, A. (2012). Shipping and Air Pollution. Envirocities eMagazine. Environmental Center for Arab Towns. Issue 3. Fernandez, P. and Perez, C. (2012). Assessment of air emissions sources in the Port of Barcelona and future scenario. Gilbert, R. et al. (1996). Making cities work: The role of local authorities in the urban environment. International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives, the United Towns Development Agency. London: Earthscan. Gore, D. J. (2004). Port idling emission reduction technologies for large cargo vessels. National idling reduction planning. Shipbuilding and Marine Technology. Han, C. H. (2010). Strategies to reduce air pollution in shipping industry. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics. 26 (1): 007-030. Harris, J.M. (2000). Basic Principles of Sustainable Development. Global Development and Environment Institute. Working paper 00-04. Turfs University. Hiranandani, V. (2012). Sustainable development in the maritime industry: A multi-case study of seaports. Journal of Maritime Affairs. 13 (1), 127-172. Kates, R., Parris, T. and Leiserowitz A. (2005). Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development. 47 (3), 8-21. Khalid, N. and Tang, J. (2010). Greening the Malaysia maritime sector: Issues, Challenges and opportunities. Maritime Institute of Malaysia. Kolk, A and Van der Veen, M. (2002). Dilemmas of balancing organizational and public interests: How environment affects strategy in Dutch main ports. European Management Journal. 20 (1), 45-54. Lam, J.S.L. and Voorde, E.V.V. (2012). Green port strategy for sustainable growth and development. Infrastructure systems and maritime studies. Nanyang Technology University, Singapore. Merk, O. (2014). Shipping emissions in ports. The international Transport Forum. Paris: France. Discussion paper, 2014-20. Miola, A. et al. (2010). Regulating air emissions from ships: The state of the art on methodologies, technologies and policy options. European Commission. Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability. Morelli, J. (2011). Environmental sustainability: A definition for environmental professionals. Rochester Institute of Technology. Okeudo, G. N. (2013). Effect of port reform on cargo throughput level at Onne seaport Nigeria: A comparative study before and after reform policy implementation. IOSR Journal of Business and Management. 12 (1), 71-78. Patel, K.V. (2012). Extended stakeholder orientation: Influence on innovation orientation and firm performance. Kennesaw State University. Paw, J.N. and Diamante, D (1995). Environment and enterprise: The case of Malacca Strait. Tropical Coast. SAREC marine services programe. 2 (1). Perrini, F. and Tencati, A. (2006). Sustanability and stakeholder management: The need for new corporate performance evaluation and reporting systems. Business Strategy and the environment. 15, 296-308. Pettit, S. and Beresford, A. (2009). Logistics relief response model: The case of Thailand's tsunami affected area. International Journal of Services Technology and Management, 12 (4), 414 – 429. Ramani, T. et al. 2009). Developing sustainable transportation performance measures for TXDOT’s strategic plan technical report. Texas Transportation Institute. Rigot-Muller, P. and Gibbs, David. (2011). The global importance of reducing carbon emissions from port operations. Port planning, design and construction. Port Technical International. Saracoglu, H., Deniz, C. and Kilic, A. (2013). An Investigation on the Effects of Ship Sourced Emissions in Izmir Port, Turkey. Department of Marine Engineering, Istanbul Technical University. Hindawi Publishing Corporation The ScientificWorld Journal. 2013, 8. Strange, T and Bayley, A. (2008). Sustainable development: Linking economy, society, environment. OECD Insights. Swaine, A and Hatic, H. (2008). Options for the marine ports sector: Green strategies for sustainable ports. EPA New England. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Taneja, P. and Vellinga, R. (2012). Role of flexibility in sustainable port development. Third International Engineering Systems Symposium, CESUN 2012, Delft University of Technology. Townsend, C. (2008). Marine fuels and engines. Royal Belgian Institute of Marine Engineers. Maritime reporter and engineering news. Trozzi, C. and Vaccaro, R. (1998). Methodologies for estimating air pollutant emissions from transport. European Commission. Trozzi, C. and Vaccaro, R. (2003). Air Pollutant Emissions from ships: High Tyrrhenian Sea ports case study. First International Conference PORTS 98 Maritime Engineering and Ports, 28-30 September 1998, Genoa, Italy. Van der Meer, R. (2012). Marine air shipping emissions in ports and their impact on local air quality: A case study on the ports of Delfzijl and Eemshave. Energy and Environmental Sciences. University of Gronigen. Wagner, M. (2011). Corporate performance implications of extended stakeholder management: New insights on mediation and moderation effects. Entrepreneurship and Corporate Growth, University of Würzburg. Winnes, H. (2009). Particle Emissions from Ships: Dependence on Fuel Type. Air & Waste Management Association. 59, 1391-1398. Winnes, H. (2010). Air Pollution from Ships: Emission Measurements and Impact Assessments. Department of Shipping and Maritime Technology. Chalmers University of Technology. Gothenburg, Sweden. Reports: Genesis Engineering Inc. (2003). Technologies and other options for reducing marine vessel emissions in the Georgia Basin. Environment Canada. GHD 2013, Environmental Best Practice Port Development: An Analysis of International Approaches. Report prepared for the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities, Canberra, Australia. I2S2 (2013). Environmental initiatives at seaports worldwide: A snapshot of best practices. Port of Portland, Portland. IMO (2009). Second IMO GHG Study 2009. International Maritime Organization, London, UK. IMO (2011). International Shipping Facts and Figures: Information Resources on Trade, Safety, Security, Environment. Maritime Knowledge Center. International Chamber of Shipping (2013). Shipping, World Trade and the reduction of CO2 emissions. United Nation Framework Convention on Climate Change. International Maritime Organization. Marine Environment Protection Committee. MPC (2010). Sustainable Development Initiatives in Malaysia. Malaysia Productivity Corporation. Petaling Jaya, Selangor. Northport (2013). Annual report 2013: The empire of trade. Northport Holdings Bhd. UNCTAD (1996). World Invesment report 1996: Investment, Trade and International Policy Arrangements. United Nations, New York and Geneva. UNCTAD (2012). UNCTAD Annual report. United Nations conference on trade and development. UNCTAD (2013). Review of maritime transport. UNCTAD/RMT/2013 United nations publication. UNEP (2007) Global Marine Assessments: A survey of global and regional assessments and related activities of the marine environment. UNEP/UNESCO-IOC/UNEP-WCMC. UNEP (2012). The Business Case for the Green Economy: Sustainable Return on Investment. United Nations Environment Programme. World Commission on Environment and Development (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford UK. Oxford University Press. Websites: Anderson, V. (2011). Let’s knock down the three pillars of sustainable development. Accessed on 21 April 2014 from http://www.social-europe.eu/2011/11/lets-knockdown- the-three-pillars-of-sustainable-development/ CIA Factbook (2014). Malaysia economic growth. Accessed on 5 Mei 2014 from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/my.html Coninck, d. H. (2011). Going Green without the Moralism. Accessed on 21 April 2014 from http://www.social-europe.eu/2011/11/going-green-without-the-moralism/ Maersk Line (2013). Triple E: The largest, most efficient ship in the world. Accessed on 25 April 2014 from http://www.maerskline.com/de-de/shipping-services/dry-cargo/ournetwork/ triple-e-card-cascading Thwink.org (2014). The three pillars of sustainability. Accessed on 17 April 2014 from http://www.thwink.org/sustain/glossary/ThreePillarsOfSustainability.htm