Evaluating the performance of GCC banks using camel framework

The economic importance of banks to developing countries may be viewed as promoting capital formation, monetization, influencing economic activity, encouraging innovation and facilitator of monetary policy. Banking sector performance evaluation is an effective measure and indicator to check the soun...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Al-Musai, Mohammed Ali Ahmed
Format:	Thesis
Language:	eng eng
Published:	2014
Subjects:	HD28-70 Management Industrial Management HG Finance
Online Access:	https://etd.uum.edu.my/5712/1/s811057_01.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/5712/2/s811057_02.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-uum-etd.5712
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection	UUM ETD
language	eng eng
advisor	Katib, Mohamed Nasser
topic	HD28-70 Management Industrial Management HG Finance
spellingShingle	HD28-70 Management Industrial Management HG Finance Al-Musai, Mohammed Ali Ahmed Evaluating the performance of GCC banks using camel framework
description	The economic importance of banks to developing countries may be viewed as promoting capital formation, monetization, influencing economic activity, encouraging innovation and facilitator of monetary policy. Banking sector performance evaluation is an effective measure and indicator to check the soundness of economic activities of an economy. This study attempts to evaluate bank's performance of the GCC region using CAMEL framework. The study examines 12 conventional banks in six GCC countries where year-end financial data from the years 2008 until 2012 were gathered from the banks' annual reports and Thomson Reuters, Data stream in the library of Universiti Utara Malaysia. The study finds that capital adequacy parameters of GCC banks are above the minimum requirement, while asset quality in the GCC countries affected the bank's performance except in Saudi Arabian banks. Management quality affects banks performance in all GCC countries except in Saudi Arabian banks. Earning ability is efficient with the banks performing well during the five years under investigation. Liquidity stood in the top position for all the 12 banks in GCC countries. The GCC countries could further improve the performance of their asset quality and management quality, using CAMEL framework as it is the best model and useful in evaluating banks performance.
format	Thesis
qualification_name	masters
qualification_level	Master's degree
author	Al-Musai, Mohammed Ali Ahmed
author_facet	Al-Musai, Mohammed Ali Ahmed
author_sort	Al-Musai, Mohammed Ali Ahmed
title	Evaluating the performance of GCC banks using camel framework
title_short	Evaluating the performance of GCC banks using camel framework
title_full	Evaluating the performance of GCC banks using camel framework
title_fullStr	Evaluating the performance of GCC banks using camel framework
title_full_unstemmed	Evaluating the performance of GCC banks using camel framework
title_sort	evaluating the performance of gcc banks using camel framework
granting_institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department	Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business
publishDate	2014
url	https://etd.uum.edu.my/5712/1/s811057_01.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/5712/2/s811057_02.pdf
_version_	1747827969787691008
spelling	my-uum-etd.57122022-04-09T23:29:22Z Evaluating the performance of GCC banks using camel framework 2014 Al-Musai, Mohammed Ali Ahmed Katib, Mohamed Nasser Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business HD28-70 Management. Industrial Management HG Finance The economic importance of banks to developing countries may be viewed as promoting capital formation, monetization, influencing economic activity, encouraging innovation and facilitator of monetary policy. Banking sector performance evaluation is an effective measure and indicator to check the soundness of economic activities of an economy. This study attempts to evaluate bank's performance of the GCC region using CAMEL framework. The study examines 12 conventional banks in six GCC countries where year-end financial data from the years 2008 until 2012 were gathered from the banks' annual reports and Thomson Reuters, Data stream in the library of Universiti Utara Malaysia. The study finds that capital adequacy parameters of GCC banks are above the minimum requirement, while asset quality in the GCC countries affected the bank's performance except in Saudi Arabian banks. Management quality affects banks performance in all GCC countries except in Saudi Arabian banks. Earning ability is efficient with the banks performing well during the five years under investigation. Liquidity stood in the top position for all the 12 banks in GCC countries. The GCC countries could further improve the performance of their asset quality and management quality, using CAMEL framework as it is the best model and useful in evaluating banks performance. 2014 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/5712/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/5712/1/s811057_01.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/5712/2/s811057_02.pdf text eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Adesina, K. S. A. (2005). Comparative performance evaluation of the Nigerian banking sector in the post-2005 consolidation: Through the Camel rating system. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(13), 259-268. Ahmed, M. F. (2008). Comparing Islamic and conventional banking performance in Kuwait using the CAMEL rating method. Unpublished Master Thesis, Maastricht School of Management. Al-Hares, 0. M., AbuGhazaleh, N. M., & El-Galfy, A. M. (2012). Financial performance and compliance with Base1 111 capital standards: Conventional vs. Islamic GCC banks. Paper presented in Las Vegas International Academic Conference, 418. Ariffin, N. M. (2012). Liquidity risk management and financial performance in malaysia: empirical evidence from islamic banks. Aceh International Journal of Social Sciences, 1 (2): 68-75 August 2012. Al-Hassan, A., Oulidi, N., & Khamis, M. (2010). The GCC banking sector: Topography and analysis. IMF Working Papers, 1-45. Alkassim, F. A. (2005). The profitability of Islamic and conventional banking in the GCC countries: A comparative study. Journal of Review of Islamic Economics, 13, 5-30. Aspal, P., &Malhotra, N. (2012).Performance appraisal of Indian public sector banks. World Journal of Social Sciences, 3(3), 7 1-88. Bank, C., & Manual, E. (1997). Overall Conclusions Regarding Condition of the Bank : Uniform Financial Institutions Rating System, Barr, R. S., Seiford, L. M., &Siems, T. F. (1993).An envelopment-analysis approach to measuring the managerial efficiency of banks. Annals of Operations Research, 45(1), 1-1 9. Barr, R. S., Killgo, K. A,, Siems, T. F., &Zimmel, S. (2002). Evaluating the productive efficiency and performance of US commercial banks. Managerial Finance, 28(8), Berger, A. N., &DeYoung, R. (2001). The effects of geographic expansion on bank efficiency. Journal of Financial Services Research, lP(2-3), 163- 184. Barros, C. P., Ferreira, C., & Williams, J. (2007).Analysing the determinants of performance of best and worst European banks: A mixed logit approach. Journal of Banking & Finance, 31(7), 21 89-2203. Chowdhury, T. A., & Ahmed, K. (2009).Performance evaluation of selected private commercial banks in Bangladesh. International Journal of Business and Management, 4(4), 86-97. Dang, U. (2011). The CAMEL rating system in banking supervision: A case study. Unpublished Bachelor Thesis, Arcada University of Applied Sciences. Espinoza, R., & Prasad, A. (2010). Nonperforming loans in the GCC banking system and their macroeconomic effects. IMF Working Papers, 1-24. Ezike, J. E., & MO, 0. (2013). Capital adequacy standards, Basle accord and bank performance: the Nigerian experience - a case study of selected banks in Nigeria. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 3(2), 146-1 59. Faizulayev, A. (201 1). Comparative analysis between Islamic banking and conventional bankingfirms in terms ofprofitability, 2006-2009. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Eastern Mediterranean University (EMU). Fader, A. (200 1). A Study On The Performance Of Malaysian Commercial Bank (Doctoral dissertation, SekolahSiswazah). Global Research Sector GCC Banking Sector. (2005), (May). Grier, W. A. (2007). Credit analysis offinancial institutions.Euromoney Books. Hassan, M. K., & Bashir, A. H. M. (2003).Determinants of Islamic banking profitability.1n the ERF Annual Conference (Vol. 16). 1-3 1. Hassoune, A. (2002). Islamic banks' profitability in an interest-rate cycle.Internationa1 Journal of Islamic Financial Services, 4(2), 1- 13. Hirtle, B., & Lopez, J. (1999).Supervisory information and the frequency of bank examinations. Economic Policy Review, 5(1), 1- 19. Ilhomovich, S. E. (2009). Factors affecting the performance of foreign banks in Malaysia. Unpublished Master Thesis, University Utara Malaysia. Islam, M. M. (2003). Development and performance of domestic and foreign banks in GCC countries. Managerial Finance, 29(2/3), 42-72. Johnes, J., izzeldin, M., & Pappas, V. (2009). The efficiency of Islamic and conventional banks in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries: An analysis using financial ratios and data envelopment analysis. Working Paper, 1-42. Kabir, M. A., &Dey, S. (2012). Performance analysis through CAMEL rating: A comparative study of selected private commercial banks in Bangladesh. Journal of Politics & Governance, 1 (2/3), 16-25. Keovongvichith, P. (2012). An analysis of the recent financial performance of the Laotian banking sector during 2005-2010. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 4(4), 148-162. Kouser, R., Aamir, M., Mehvish, H., &Azeem, M. (201 1). CAMEL analysis for Islamic and conventional banks: Comparative study from Pakistan. Economics and Finance Review, l(1 O), 55-64. Kumar, M. A., Harsha, G. S., Anand, S., &Dhruva, N. R (2012). Analyzing soundness in Indian banking: A CAMEL approach. Research Journal of Management Sciences, 1 (3), 9- 14. Laabas, B., &Limam, I. (2002)Are GCC countries ready for currency union?.Arab Planning Inst itute-Kuwait .Retrieved fiom http://www.arabapi. org/images/publication/pdfs/253/253~wps02.p0d3 f. Khamis, M., and A. Senhadji, (2010) "Impact of the Global Financial Crisis on the Gulf Cooperation Council Countries and Challenges Ahead: An.UpdateYnW ashington DC: International Monetary Fund. Matkar, A. (2013). Evaluate the financial performance of MSC bank: CAMEL Model. ASM's International E-Journal of Ongoing Research in Management and IT, 1- 16. Mithcell, K. (1984). Capital adequacy at commercial banks. Economic Review, 17-30. Mishra, S. (2012, November).A CAMEL model analysis of state bank group.In Proceedings of 19th International Business Research Conference. Mohd Ariffin, N. (20 12). Liquidity risk management and financial performance in Malaysia: Empirical evidence from Islamic banks. Aceh International Journal of Social Sciences, 1 (2), 68-75. Najjar, N. J. (2013). Can financial ratios reliably measure the performance of banks in Bahrain? International Journal of Economics and Finance, 5(3), 1 52. NEPAL RASTRA BANK (NRB). (2005). Annual bank supervision report 2003-2004. 1- 74. Olweny, T., &Shipho, T. M. (2011).Effects of banking sectoral factors on the profdability of commercial banks in Kenya. Economics and Finance Review, 1(5), 1-30. Ongore, V. O., &Kusa, G. B. (2013).Deteminants of financial performance of commercial banks in Kenya. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 3(1), 237-252. Pinyani, A., Saluja, P., Daga, V. K., &Rao, N. V. (2013).Comparative analysis of banking models.Great Lakes Herald, 7(1), 41-54. Prasad, K. V. N., & Reddy, D. M. (2012).Evaluating performance of nationalized banks and SBI group through CAMEL model.ACADEMZCL4: An International Multidisciplina~yR esearch Journal, 2(3), 32-39. Ravichandran, K., & Sharma, R. B. (2009).Ranking of Saudi banks using CRAMEL model.Internationa1 Academic Research Journal of Economics and Finance, 1(1), 18-26. Rahman, M. M. (2012). Banking sector reforms in bangladesh and its impact (Doctoral dissertation, Asian Institute of Technology). Rozzani, N., &Rahman, R. (2013). CAMELS and performance evaluation of banks in Malaysia: Conventional versus Islamic. Journal of Islamic Finance and Business Research, 2(1), 36-45. Sangmi, M. U. D., &Nazir, T. (2010).Analyzing financial performance of commercial banks in India: Application of CAMEL model. Pak. J Commer. Soc. Sci, 4(1), 40- 55. Siraj, K. K., &Sudarsanan, P. P. (2012).Comparative study on performance of Islamic banks and conventional banks in GCC region. Journal of Applied Finance and Banking, 2(3), 123- 16 1. Smaoui, H., & Salah, I. B. (201 l).ProJitability ofIslamic banks in the GCC region.In the Annual Paris Conference on Money, Economy and Management. Soltani, M., Esmaili, M., poor, M. H., &Karimi, H. (2013). Evaluating the performance of public and private banks and providing suggestions for improving the performance of them - Case study: Melli, Agriculture, Pasargad and Parsian bank of Qom. Journal of Basic Applied Science Research, 3(2), 480-487. Standard Chartered Bank, (2013). About Banking in Bahrain - The Early Years, Global finance, https:llwww.sc.comlbh/our-historylen Sturm, M., Strasky, J., Adolf, P., &Peschel, D. (2008).The gulf cooperation council countries-economic structures, recent developments and role in the global economy. ECB Occasional Paper, 92. Valahzaghard, M. K., Wabbari, S. (2013). A study on relationship between CAMELS indexes and risk taking: A case study of Iranian banking industry. Management Science Letters, 3, 1 175- 1 180. Zeitun, R. (2012). Determinants of Islamic and conventional banks performance in gcc countries using panel data analysis. Global Economy and Finance Journal, 5(1), 53-72.

Evaluating the performance of GCC banks using camel framework

Similar Items