Jenis dan Skop Tugas Guru Kanan Mata Pelajaran

The purpose of this study was to obtain an insight into the nature and scope of duties performed by GKMP in secondary schools in West Coast of Sabah. Specifically the study aimed to investigate: (1) the exact nature and range of the duties performed frequently by GKMP; (2) the time / effort devoted...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Muniandi, Jaya Silar
Format:	Thesis
Language:	eng eng
Published:	1998
Subjects:	LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
Online Access:	https://etd.uum.edu.my/576/1/JAYA_SILAR_AL_MUNIANDI_-_Jenis_Dan_Skop_Tugas_Guru_Kanan_Mata_Pelajaran.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/576/2/1.JAYA_SILAR_AL_MUNIANDI_-_Jenis_Dan_Skop_Tugas_Guru_Kanan_Mata_Pelajaran.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-uum-etd.576
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection	UUM ETD
language	eng eng
topic	LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
spellingShingle	LB2801-3095 School administration and organization Muniandi, Jaya Silar Jenis dan Skop Tugas Guru Kanan Mata Pelajaran
description	The purpose of this study was to obtain an insight into the nature and scope of duties performed by GKMP in secondary schools in West Coast of Sabah. Specifically the study aimed to investigate: (1) the exact nature and range of the duties performed frequently by GKMP; (2) the time / effort devoted to the five main categories of duties (teaching, administration, curriculum, co-curriculum and informal counseling) by GKMP; (3) the problems encountered by GKMP; and (4) the existence of discernible differences in duties performed by GKMP based on factors such as type of school, administrative climate of school, leadership behavior of GKMP, and years of experience as GKMP. Forty three GKMP responded to the survey questionnaire - the method employed to collect the data for the study. Frequency distribution and percentage were obtained and presented in the form of tables. T-test and Chi-Square analyses were employed to test the significance of the associations. The findings indicate that majority of the GKMP in PBS are young and inexperienced teachers. Teaching emerged as the most important responsibility area. They devoted more than thirty percent of their time in the school to teaching. Besides teaching the GKMP also performed curriculum, administrative, co-curriculum and informal counseling duties. It was found that the GKMP, in addition to frequently performing a wide range of curriculum and administrative duties, devoted less than forty percent of their time in accomplishing these duties. The GKMP, on the other hand, did not only devote less time to the co-curriculum and informal counseling duties, but they performed very few duties frequently in these areas. In addition, they did indicate that they would like to devote more time to professional and informal counseling duties. Problems GKMP stated they encountered in discharging their duties, included problems of teachers’ cooperation, lack of competence to accomplish their duties, and personal frustrations due to lack of recognition. The study recommends that further research be conducted in the areas of training facilities, and other factors influencing the nature and scope of duties for GPMK in secondary schools.
format	Thesis
qualification_name	masters
qualification_level	Master's degree
author	Muniandi, Jaya Silar
author_facet	Muniandi, Jaya Silar
author_sort	Muniandi, Jaya Silar
title	Jenis dan Skop Tugas Guru Kanan Mata Pelajaran
title_short	Jenis dan Skop Tugas Guru Kanan Mata Pelajaran
title_full	Jenis dan Skop Tugas Guru Kanan Mata Pelajaran
title_fullStr	Jenis dan Skop Tugas Guru Kanan Mata Pelajaran
title_full_unstemmed	Jenis dan Skop Tugas Guru Kanan Mata Pelajaran
title_sort	jenis dan skop tugas guru kanan mata pelajaran
granting_institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department	Sekolah Siswazah
publishDate	1998
url	https://etd.uum.edu.my/576/1/JAYA_SILAR_AL_MUNIANDI_-_Jenis_Dan_Skop_Tugas_Guru_Kanan_Mata_Pelajaran.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/576/2/1.JAYA_SILAR_AL_MUNIANDI_-_Jenis_Dan_Skop_Tugas_Guru_Kanan_Mata_Pelajaran.pdf
_version_	1747826947635806208
spelling	my-uum-etd.5762013-07-24T12:07:56Z Jenis dan Skop Tugas Guru Kanan Mata Pelajaran 1998-06-08 Muniandi, Jaya Silar Sekolah Siswazah Graduate School LB2801-3095 School administration and organization The purpose of this study was to obtain an insight into the nature and scope of duties performed by GKMP in secondary schools in West Coast of Sabah. Specifically the study aimed to investigate: (1) the exact nature and range of the duties performed frequently by GKMP; (2) the time / effort devoted to the five main categories of duties (teaching, administration, curriculum, co-curriculum and informal counseling) by GKMP; (3) the problems encountered by GKMP; and (4) the existence of discernible differences in duties performed by GKMP based on factors such as type of school, administrative climate of school, leadership behavior of GKMP, and years of experience as GKMP. Forty three GKMP responded to the survey questionnaire - the method employed to collect the data for the study. Frequency distribution and percentage were obtained and presented in the form of tables. T-test and Chi-Square analyses were employed to test the significance of the associations. The findings indicate that majority of the GKMP in PBS are young and inexperienced teachers. Teaching emerged as the most important responsibility area. They devoted more than thirty percent of their time in the school to teaching. Besides teaching the GKMP also performed curriculum, administrative, co-curriculum and informal counseling duties. It was found that the GKMP, in addition to frequently performing a wide range of curriculum and administrative duties, devoted less than forty percent of their time in accomplishing these duties. The GKMP, on the other hand, did not only devote less time to the co-curriculum and informal counseling duties, but they performed very few duties frequently in these areas. In addition, they did indicate that they would like to devote more time to professional and informal counseling duties. Problems GKMP stated they encountered in discharging their duties, included problems of teachers’ cooperation, lack of competence to accomplish their duties, and personal frustrations due to lack of recognition. The study recommends that further research be conducted in the areas of training facilities, and other factors influencing the nature and scope of duties for GPMK in secondary schools. 1998-06 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/576/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/576/1/JAYA_SILAR_AL_MUNIANDI_-_Jenis_Dan_Skop_Tugas_Guru_Kanan_Mata_Pelajaran.pdf application/pdf eng validuser https://etd.uum.edu.my/576/2/1.JAYA_SILAR_AL_MUNIANDI_-_Jenis_Dan_Skop_Tugas_Guru_Kanan_Mata_Pelajaran.pdf application/pdf eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Abdul Rahman bin Arshad, Role of School Administration for More Effective Education, Jernal Persidangan Kebangsaan Pengetua Sekolah-sekolah Menengah Davis, M.J. (1974), Secondary School Administration, A Management Approach. Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1974. Acheson, K.A and Smith, S.C., It Is Time for Principals to Share the Responsibility for Instructional Leadership with Other, Oregon School Study Council, University Of Oregon, Feb. 1986. OSSV Bulletin series. Barry, C.H. and Tye, F., Running a School, Temple Smith, London, 1975. Bass, B. M., Leadership, Psychology and Organizational Behavior, New York, Harper and Row, 1960. Basset, G.W. Crane, A.R., and Walker, W.G., Headmasters for Better Schools, Second Edition. St. Lucia, University of Queensland Press, 1974. Boles, H. W., Educational Leadership And Accountability, Kertas yang disampaikan dalam Sixth National Conference of the Australian Council for Educational Administration, Perth, August, 1979. Chang Hock Seong, The Role and Characteristics of Senior Assistants as Perceived by Secondary School Teachers, Dissertation for B.Ed., 1969. Coleman, J.S., Differences Between Experiential and Classroom Learning, dalam Ramaiah, A1. Kepimpinan Pendidikan Cabaran Masa Hadapan, Petaling Jaya, IBS Buku Sdn. Bhd., 1992. Crow, L.D. dan Crow, M.A., Psikologi Pendidikan Untuk Perguruan, (Terjemahan Habibab Bt. Elias). Kuala Lumpur, DBP, 1983. De Bevoise, W., Synthesis of Research on the Principal as Instructional Leader, Educational; Leadershp 4 1,5, Feb 1984. Dorall, S.M., Duties and Responsibilities of Senior Assistant Teachers (or Supervisors) in Primary Schools, Journal Kementerian Pendidikan Pelaiaran Malaysia Keluaran 30, Jilid XI, April, 1968. Ernest Dale, Organisation, American Management Association, 1967. Eliot D. Chapple and Lamard R. Sayles, The Measure of Management Designing Organisations for Human Effectiveness, New York, The Macmillan Co, 1961. Fiedlesr, F.D.A., A Theory of Leadership Effectiveness, McCraw-Hill, New York, 1967. ......, The Contingency Model and the Dynamics of Leadershp Process, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 11, 1973. Fielding, G. D., and Schalock, H.D., Promoting the Professional Development of Teachers and Administrators, Eugene, OR: Center for Educational Policy and Management, University of Oregon, 1986. Edrnonds, E.L., The First Headship, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1968. Ferguson, Donald G., Pupil Personnel Services, Six Edition. New York: Center for Applied Research in Education, 1968. Griffin, G., Introduction: The Work of Staff Development, dalam Ramaiah, AI. Kepimpinan Pendidikan Cabaran Masa Hadapan, Petaling Jaya, IBS Buku Sdn. Bhd., 1992. Griffith, D.E., Administrative Theory, New York: Appleton Century-Croft, 1959. Goldman S., The School Principal, The Library of Educations, The Center for Applied Research in Education, Inc., New York, 1966. Goodwin, F.J., The Art of the Headmaster, Ward Lock Educational, 1968. Grace, Gerald R., Role Conflict and the Teacher, Routledge & Kegen Paul, London & Boston, 1972. Gregg, R.T. The Administrative Process, in Ronald F. Campbell and Russell T. Gregg (eds.), Administrative Behaviour in Education, New York, 1957. Habsah Ismail, Guru dan Autoriti Implikasi Terhadap Pendidikan, Jurnal Guru Ke arah Pembinaan Budaya Ilmu. Keluaran 6, Mei, 1994. Harchand Singh Thandi, Some Aspects of Teachers' Perceptions of Principals Administrative Behavior in Selected Primary Schools in Johore, M.Ed Thesis, University Malaya, 1972. Henry Ben M., In-service Education for Staff Development, Newton, Massachusetts, Allyn and Bacon lnc, 1985. Howey, A.K. and Vaughan, J.C., Current Patterns of Staff Development, dalam Ramaiah. AI. Kepimpinan Pendidikan Cabaran Masa Hadapan, Petaling Jaya, IBS Buku Sdn. Bhd., 1992. Hussein bin Ahmad, Perkembangan Staf Di Sekolah: Bentuk dan Cara Perlaksanaannys. Jurnal Pengurusan Pendidikan, IAB, Kementerian Pendidikan Jilid 1, Bi1.2, Jun 1991. Jones, P.J.. Case Study: A matter of Leadership, dalam Jones, P.J. (eds) Readings and Cases in Educational Administration, School of Management, Wait, Perth, 1981. Kamaruddin Kachar, Pentadbiran Pendidikan di Malaysia, Kertas Kerja dalam Jernal PKPSM, 1983. Keefe, J. and John Jenkins, (eds.), Intructional Leadership Handbook, Reston, Virginia: National Association of Secondary School Prinsipals, 1984. King, Ronald, The Head Teacher and His Authority. In Headship in the 1970's. Bryan Allen (Ed.) London: Basil Blackwell, 1968. Koopman, Miel and Misner, Democracy in School Administration, London & Boston, 1943. Lee Pau Wing, Fungsi dan Peranan Ketua Panitia Mata Pelajaran, Jurnal Pendidikan Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia, Keluaran 76, Jilid 36, Jun 1992. Lauhery, Wayne, W., Expedience or Vision in the Assigment of Assistant Principal's Duties, Bulletin of the National Association of Secondary School Principals, 1968. Mc Millon, J.J., and Schumacher, S., Research In Education : A Conceptual Introduction, 3rd ed., Harper Collins, College Publishers, 1993. Melnick, S.A., and Gable, R.K., Self Perceived Need For Staff Development Trainning : Are We Really Getting Better As We Get Older?, Education Research Quarterly, 13(A), 17-26. Mohd. Majid Katong, Kaedah Penyelidikan Pendidikan, Kuala Lumpur, DBP, 1994. Moore, Harold E., The Administration of Public School Personnel, Fourth Edition. New York: Center for Applied Research in Education, 1968. Mukherjee, G.H, The Principal's Staff Leadership Role - A Survey of Principal and Teacher Expectations in Selected Petalincg Jaya and Kuala Lumpur Schools, M.Ed. Thesis, University of Malaya, 1970. Nelson C. Dometrius, Social Statistics Using SPSS, New York, Harper Collins Publisher, 1992. Peter, T.J., and Waterman, R.H., In Search of Excellence Lessons from America's Best-Run Companies, New York, Warner Books, 1984. Peterson, R., Managing Successful Learning A Practical Guide to Teacher and Trainers, New York, Warner Books, 1992. Prestwood, E.L., The High School Principal and Staff Work Together, Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, 1957. Rahimah Hj. Ahmad & Mohd. Yaacob Mat Nong, Tingkah laku Kepimpinan dan Amalan Profesionalisme di kalangan Pentadbir Pendidikan di Malaysia: Satu Tinjauan Bahan Kajian, Kertas Kerja yang Dibentangkan dalam Konvensyen Nasional Keenam Mengenai Pendidikan, Sep. 1988. Ramaiah, AT., Kepimpinan Pendidikan Cabaran Masa Hadapan, Petaling Jaya, IBS Buku Sdn. Bhd., 1992. Rapport, R. and Rapport, R.N., Leisure and the Family Life Cycle, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1975. Rogers, V.,Talbot, C and Cosgrove, E., Excellence: Some Lessons from America's Best Run Companies, dalam Educational Leadership, Feb. 1984. Rosemary Stewart, Hakikat Organisasi (Terjemahan), Kuala Lumpur, DBP, 1985. Rubin, L.J., Frontier in School Leadership, Rand McNally and Company, Chicago, 1970. Schofield, T., The Creation of a Good Comprehensive School, A Report to the City of Mancherter Education Committee, 1980. Shertzer, B. dan Stone, S.C., Fundamental of Guidance, dalam Tang Chee Yee, Bimbingan dan Kaunseling : Perkhidmatan, Prosedur dan Kemahiran, Kuala Lumpur, Kumpulan Budiman Sdn. Bhd., 1987. Shuster, A.H. and W.F. Wetzler, Leadership in Elementary Administrations and Supervision, Houghton Mifflin Co. Boston, 1958. Stodgill, R.M., Handbook of Leadership, The Free Press, New York, 1974. Tai Yoon Choog, Senior Assistants' Perception of Their Functions and Characteristics in Secondary Schools in Kuala Lumpur and Petaling Jaya, Dissertation for B.Ed, University of Malaya., 1969. Teary, G. R., Principles of Management, 3rd. Edition Homewood, Illinois, 1960. Yap Teong Hoon dan James Fernandez, Guru Besar dan Pentadbiran Sekolah, Jurnal Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia, Keluaran 66, Jilid XXIX, Jun 1985. Weiss, G.A.W., The Duties of the Secondary School Vice Principal, The Bulletin of the National Association of Secondary School Principals, December. 1953. Wood, F. H. and Thompson, S.R., Guidelines for Better Staff Development, Educational Leadership, Feb. 1980. Wynn, Richard D., Organisation of Public Schools, Third Edition, New York: Center for Applied Research in Education, 1968. Zaidatol Akmaliah Lope Pihie, Pengurusan Sekolah yang Efekif, Jurnal Pendidikan Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia, Keluaran 72, Jilid XXXIII, Disember 1989.

Jenis dan Skop Tugas Guru Kanan Mata Pelajaran

Similar Items