Pemodelan hubungan diantara kesejahteraan hidup guru, keserakanan dan kesejahteraan guru di tempat kerja dengan efikasi guru secara kolektif

Pemodelan hubungan diantara kesejahteraan hidup guru, keserakanan dan kesejahteraan guru di tempat kerja dengan efikasi guru secara kolektif

Teachers with lower workplace wellbeing had lower personal wellbeing and lower collective teacher efficacy. Ministry of Education is looking for a formula to improve collective teacher efficacy, the wellbeing of teachers and improve their working environment. In addition to factors such, collegiali...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Yusni Zaini, Yusof
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
Published: 2016
Subjects:
LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/5799/1/s94063_02.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/5799/2/s94063_01.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.5799
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
advisor Awang Hashim, Rosna
Tengku Ariffin, Tengku Faekah
topic LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
spellingShingle LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
Yusni Zaini, Yusof
Pemodelan hubungan diantara kesejahteraan hidup guru, keserakanan dan kesejahteraan guru di tempat kerja dengan efikasi guru secara kolektif
description Teachers with lower workplace wellbeing had lower personal wellbeing and lower collective teacher efficacy. Ministry of Education is looking for a formula to improve collective teacher efficacy, the wellbeing of teachers and improve their working environment. In addition to factors such, collegiality is also an important element in achieving excellence and collective teacher efficacy. Research into the factors that contribute to collective teacher efficacy is very much needed in a developing country like Malaysia. Based on a social cognitive model, the study examined direct and indirect precursors of collective teacher efficacy. Specifically, it assessed the roles of personal wellbeing, collegiality, and workplace wellbeing in explaining collective teacher efficacy. A sample of 836 teachers was randomly selected from 12 Maktab Rendah Sains Mara in the east coast of Malaysia. Data were obtained through a survey questionnaire that comprised 85 items. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, MANOVA analysis and Structural Equation Modelling. Results indicated that personal wellbeing, collegiality and workplace wellbeing are significant influences of collective teacher efficacy. Based on the holistic approach in model evaluation, the overall measurement model and the structural model were found to be adequately fit. The findings of the structural equation modelling indicate that workplace wellbeing partially mediated the relationship of personal wellbeing, collegiality and collective teacher efficacy. Compared to personal wellbeing, teacher collegiality seems to exhibit a stronger impact on collective teacher efficacy. This study has contributed to the development of the social cognitive theoretical framework by examining the relationship between personal wellbeing, collegiality, work place wellbeing and collective teacher efficacy. The study also provides firm support for the claims in social cognitive theory as the variables examined in the study were found to have an enormous influence on teachers' collective efficacy in Malaysia. The school management should review all the virtues associated with teachers such as personal wellbeing, workplace wellbeing, collegiality and collective efficacy of teachers in school so that teachers more efficiently carry out the tasks in school.
format Thesis
qualification_name Ph.D.
qualification_level Doctorate
author Yusni Zaini, Yusof
author_facet Yusni Zaini, Yusof
author_sort Yusni Zaini, Yusof
title Pemodelan hubungan diantara kesejahteraan hidup guru, keserakanan dan kesejahteraan guru di tempat kerja dengan efikasi guru secara kolektif
title_short Pemodelan hubungan diantara kesejahteraan hidup guru, keserakanan dan kesejahteraan guru di tempat kerja dengan efikasi guru secara kolektif
title_full Pemodelan hubungan diantara kesejahteraan hidup guru, keserakanan dan kesejahteraan guru di tempat kerja dengan efikasi guru secara kolektif
title_fullStr Pemodelan hubungan diantara kesejahteraan hidup guru, keserakanan dan kesejahteraan guru di tempat kerja dengan efikasi guru secara kolektif
title_full_unstemmed Pemodelan hubungan diantara kesejahteraan hidup guru, keserakanan dan kesejahteraan guru di tempat kerja dengan efikasi guru secara kolektif
title_sort pemodelan hubungan diantara kesejahteraan hidup guru, keserakanan dan kesejahteraan guru di tempat kerja dengan efikasi guru secara kolektif
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts & Sciences
publishDate 2016
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/5799/1/s94063_02.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/5799/2/s94063_01.pdf
_version_ 1776103679943770112
spelling my-uum-etd.57992023-03-09T04:10:32Z Pemodelan hubungan diantara kesejahteraan hidup guru, keserakanan dan kesejahteraan guru di tempat kerja dengan efikasi guru secara kolektif 2016 Yusni Zaini, Yusof Awang Hashim, Rosna Tengku Ariffin, Tengku Faekah Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts & Sciences Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts and Sciences LB2801-3095 School administration and organization Teachers with lower workplace wellbeing had lower personal wellbeing and lower collective teacher efficacy. Ministry of Education is looking for a formula to improve collective teacher efficacy, the wellbeing of teachers and improve their working environment. In addition to factors such, collegiality is also an important element in achieving excellence and collective teacher efficacy. Research into the factors that contribute to collective teacher efficacy is very much needed in a developing country like Malaysia. Based on a social cognitive model, the study examined direct and indirect precursors of collective teacher efficacy. Specifically, it assessed the roles of personal wellbeing, collegiality, and workplace wellbeing in explaining collective teacher efficacy. A sample of 836 teachers was randomly selected from 12 Maktab Rendah Sains Mara in the east coast of Malaysia. Data were obtained through a survey questionnaire that comprised 85 items. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, MANOVA analysis and Structural Equation Modelling. Results indicated that personal wellbeing, collegiality and workplace wellbeing are significant influences of collective teacher efficacy. Based on the holistic approach in model evaluation, the overall measurement model and the structural model were found to be adequately fit. The findings of the structural equation modelling indicate that workplace wellbeing partially mediated the relationship of personal wellbeing, collegiality and collective teacher efficacy. Compared to personal wellbeing, teacher collegiality seems to exhibit a stronger impact on collective teacher efficacy. This study has contributed to the development of the social cognitive theoretical framework by examining the relationship between personal wellbeing, collegiality, work place wellbeing and collective teacher efficacy. The study also provides firm support for the claims in social cognitive theory as the variables examined in the study were found to have an enormous influence on teachers' collective efficacy in Malaysia. The school management should review all the virtues associated with teachers such as personal wellbeing, workplace wellbeing, collegiality and collective efficacy of teachers in school so that teachers more efficiently carry out the tasks in school. 2016 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/5799/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/5799/1/s94063_02.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/5799/2/s94063_01.pdf text eng public Ph.D. doctoral Universiti Utara Malaysia Abdullah, J. (2009). Lowering teacher attrition rates through collegiality. Academic Leadership Journal, 7 (1), 84-88. Abdul Shukor Shaari, Abd. Rahim Romle & Mohamad Yazi Yahya. (2006). Bertugas Guru Sekolah Rendah. Kertas yang dibentangkan dalam Seminar Kebangsaan Kepimpinan dan Pengurusan Sekolah,12-14 Februari. Alson Klana Resort, Seremban. Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Razavieh, A. (2002). Introduction to research in education. Sixth Edition. USA : Wadsworth Group. Babbie, E. (2007). The practice of social research (11th ed.). Singapore: Thomson Learning. Baicker, K., Cutler, D., & Song, Z. (2010). Workplace wellness programs can generate savings. Health Affairs, 29(2), 304-311. Bajorek, Z.M. (2013). The Management of Temporary Staff in Healthcare Emergency Departments: Implication for Patient Safety and Service Quality, PhD, King’s College London: United Kingdom. Bandura, A. (1977). “Self-efficacy:Toward a unifying theory of behavior change”. Psychological Review, 84,191-215. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and actions: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall. Bandura, A. (1993). “Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning”. Educational Psychologist, 28, 117-148. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory behavior change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215. Bandura, A. (2006). Adolescent development from an agentic perspective. In F. Pajares, & T.Urdan(Eds.), ITALIC Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp.1-43). Greenwich, Connecticut: Information Age Publishing. Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182. Bentler, P.M. (1990). Comparative Fit Indexes in Strutural Models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238 - 246. 164 Bolam, R. (2005). Creating and sustaining effective profesional learning communities, Research Report RR637, University of Bristol. Briner, R. & Dewberry, C. (2007). Staff wellbeing is key to school success. A research study into the links between staff wellbeing and school performance. London: Worklife Support. Butt, R.L. & Retallick, J. (2002). Profesional well being and learning : a study of administrator-teacher workplace relationships. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 3(1), 17-34. Brislin, R.W. (1970). Back translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross- Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185-216. Browne, M.W. & Cudeck, R. (1993). Structural equation models : Alternative ways of assessing model fit in Testing. K.A Bollen and J.S Long, (Eds) Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 136-62. Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Steca, P., & Malone, P. S. (2006). Teachers’ self efficacy beliefs as determinants of job satisfaction andstudents’ academic achievement: A study at the school level. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 473–490. 165 Day, C. (2000). Leading schools in times of change. Buckingham: Open University Press. Dewberry, C. & Briner, R. (2007). Report for Worklife Support on the relation between well-being and climate in schools and pupil performance. London: Worklife Support. DuFour, R. (2004). What is a “professional learning community?” Educational Leadership, 61 (8), 6-11. Eells, R.J. (2011). Meta Analysis of the Relationship Between Collective Teacher Efficacy and Student Achievement. Dissertations.Paper 133. Fuchs, S. & Edwards, M.R. (2012). Predicting pro-change behaviour the role of perceived organizational justice and organizational identification. Human Resources Management Journal 22(1),39-59. Gable, R., Mostert, M., & Tonelson S. (2004). Assessing professional collaboration in schools: Knowing what works. Preventing Schools Failure, 48 (3), 4-9. Ghitulescu, B.E. (2013). Making change happen: The impact of work context on adaptive and proactive behaviours. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 49(2), 206-245. 166 Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2004). Collective efficacy beliefs:theoretical developments, empirical evidence, and future directions. Educational Research, 33, 3-13. Goddard, Y. L., Goddard, R, D., & Tschannen-moran, M. (2007). A theoretical and empirical investigation of teacher collaboration for school improvement and student achievement in public elementary schools. Teacher Collage Record, 109 (4), 877-896. Hair, J.F., Black, W. C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate Analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice- Hall. Hallinger, P. & Heck, R.H. (2010). Collaborative leadership and school improvement: understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning. School Leadership and Management, 30(2), 95-110. Hodkinson, P. (2005). Reconceptualising the relations between college‐based and workplace learning. Journal of Workplace Learning, 17(8), 521-532. Idris, A.A., & Wan Fauziah Wan Yusoff. (2012). Does motivational factor influence organizational commitment and effectiveness?. Journal of Business Management and Economics. 3(1), 1-9. 167 Jarzabkowski, L.M. (2002). The social dimensions of teacher collegiality. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 3(2), 1-20. Jewezyn, N. (2010). Job satisfaction,morale, and cultural diversity: Factors influencing workers perspectives, expectations and management strategies. Journal of Virtual Leadership,1, 1-11. Kathryn, P. (2005). The Workplace Wellbeing Index.acqul.dealin.edu.au/instruments. Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2013). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013- 2025, Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. Klassen, R. M., Bong, M., Usher, E. L., Chong, W. H., Huan, V. S., Wong,I. Y., & Georgiou, T. (2009). Exploring the validity of the Teachers’Self-Efficacy Scale in five countries. Contemporary Educational Psychology,34, 67–76. Klassen, R. M., Bong, M., Usher, E. L., Chong, W. H., Huan, V. S., Wong, I. Y., & Georgiou, T. (2009). Exploring the validity of the Teachers’Self-Efficacy Scale in five countries. Contemporary Educational Psychology,34, 67–76. Klassen, R.M. (2010). Effects on Teachers’ Self-Efficacy and Job Satisfaction:Teacher Gender, Years of Experience, and Job Stress. Journal of Educational Psychology ,102( 3), 741–756. 168 Knapp, M. S. (2003). Professional development as a policy pathway. Review of Research in Education, 27 (1). 109-157. Kokkinos, C.M. (2007). Job stressors, personality and burnout in primary school teachers. British Journal of Educational Psychology.77, 229-243. Krejcie, R.W., & Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 608-619. Lakey, B., & Cohen, S. (2000). Social support theory and measurement. In S. Cohen, L.G. Underwood, & B.H. Gottlieb (Eds.), Social support measurement and intervention: A guide for health and social scientist (pp. 29-52). New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press. Lean, C.R.,& Pil, F.K. (2006). Social capital and organizational performance: Evidence from urban public schools. Organization Science, 17 (3), 353 – 366. Little, T.D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K.F. (2002). Structural Equation Modeling: To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighting the merits, 9, 151-173. Little, J. W., Gearhart, M., Curry, M., & Kafta, J. (2006). Looking at student work for teacher learning, teacher community and school reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 85 (3), 184-192. 169 Lopez, S.J. (2010). Making ripples: How principals and teachers can spread hope throughout our Schools. Phi Delta Kappan 91, (September 2009): 58-6. Madiha, S. (2011). The Dimensionality of Teacher Collegiality and the Development of Teacher Collegiality Scale. International Journal Of Education, 3 (2), 150-222. Muhyiddin Yaasin. (2013). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025, Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. Nelson, B. (2003). Money is not the root of all motivation. Health Care Registration,12(10), 7- 9. Noriati A. Rashid, Boon Pong Ying, Wong Kiet Wah. (2010). Asas Kepimpinan dan Perkembangan Profesional Guru. Shah Alam: Oxford Fajar. Numeroff, D. (2005). Teacher collegiality and collaboration in exemplary high school math department. Doctoral dissertation, Florida Atlantic University, AAT 3162664. Pas, E., Bradshaw, C., Hershfeldt, P., & Leaf, P. (2010). A multilevel exploration of the influence of teaher efficacy and burnout on response to student problem behavior and school-based service use. School Psychology Quarterly, 25, 13-27. 170 Rosna Awang-Hashim & Azlina Murad Sani. (2008). A confirmatory factor analysis of a newly integrated multidimensional school engagement scale. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 5, 21- 40. Rosna, A., O’ Neil, H.F., Hocevar, D. (2002). Ethnicity, effort, self-efficacy, worry and statistic achievement in Malaysia: A construct validation of the state-trait motivation model. Educational Assessment, 8, 341 – 364. Retallick, J., & Butt. R. (2004). Professional well-being and learning: A study of teacher-peer workplace relationships. Journey of Educational Enquiry, 5 (1), 85- 99. Parmjit, S., Y. F. Chan & G.K. Sidhu. (2006). A comprehensive guide to writing a research proposal. Selangor:Venton Publication. Pas, E.,Bradshaw, C., Hershfeldt, P.,& Leaf, P.(2010). A multilevel exploration of the influence of teaher efficacy and burnout on response to student problem behavior and school-based service use. School Psychology Quarterly, 25, 13-27. Sarwar, S., Aslam, H.D., & Rasheed, M.I. (2010). Hindering factors of beginning teachers’ high performance in higher education Pakistan – A case study of IUBThe Islamia- University of Bahawalpur. International Journal of Education, 2(1), 112-123. 171 Schaufeli,W.B., & Salanova, M. (2007). Efficacy or inefficacy, that’s the question:burnout and work engagement, and their relationships with efficacy beliefs.Anxiety, Stress, & Coping. An International Journal, 20, 177-196. Skaalvik, E.M., & Skaalvik, S. (2007). Dimensions of teacher self-efficacy and relations with strain factors, perceived collective teacher efficacy, and teacher burnout. Journal Of Educational Psychology, 99, 611-625. Skaalvik, E.M., & Skaalvik, S. (2008). Teacher self-efficacy: conceptual analysis and relations with teacher burnout and perceived school context. In R. Craven, H.W.Marsh, & D.Mclnerney ( Eds.), Self-processes,learning, and enabling human potential (pp.223-247).Connecticut: Information Age Publishing. Supovitz, J.A., & Christman, J.B. (2003). Developing communities of instructional practice: Lessons from Cincinnati and Philadelphia. CPRE Policy Briefs, 1-10. Tabachnik, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2007). Using multivariate statistic (5th.ed.) Boston: Pearson Education Inc. Tatlah, I.A., Ali, Z., & Saeed, M. (2011). Leadership behavior and organizational commitment: An empirical study of educational profesional. International journal of Academic Research, 3(2), 1293-1298. 172 The American Heritage Dictionary of the English language, 4th ed. (2002). Tengku Faekah Tengku Ariffin, Rosna Awang Hashim & Khulida Kirana Yahya. (2010). Modelling The Relationships between Personality Factors, Perceptions of the School as a Learning Organisation and Workplace Learning of School Teachers. Malaysian Journal Of Learning and Instruction, 7, 16-35. Trochim, W.M.,K., & Donnelly, J.P. (2008). Research methods knowledge base (3rd ed.). Mason, OH: Cengage Learning. Tschnnen-Moran, M. (2001). Collaboration and the need for trust. Journal of Educational Administration, 39 (4), 308-331. Tschannen - Moran, M., & Barr, M. (2004). Fostering student learning: The relationship of collective teacher efficacy and student achievement. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 3(3), 189-209. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing and elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783-805. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2007). The differential antecedents of selfefficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers. Teaching and teacher Education, 23, 944-956. 173 Van Veen, K., & Sleegers, P. (2006). How does it feel? Teachers’ emotions in a context of change . Journal of Curriculum studies, 38 (1), 85-111. Walker,C., & Greene, B. (2009). The relations between student motivational beliefs and cognitive engagement in high school. Journal of Educational Research, 102, 463-472. Wang, J., Odell, S. J., & Schwille, S. A. (2008). Effects of teacher induction on beginning teachers’ teaching: A critical review of the liberature. Journal of Teacher Education, 59 (2). 132-152. Webster’s College Dictionary. (1997). New York, NY: Random House. Wiersma, W. (2000). Research in Education: An Introduction. Boston:Allyn and Bacon. Williams, A., Prestage, S., & Bedward, J. (2001). Individualism to Collaboration: the significance of teacher culture to the induction of newly qualified teachers. Journal of Education for Teaching, 27 (3), 253-267. Wood, A. M.,& Weasmer, J. (2002). Maintaining job satisfaction: Engaging professionals as active participants. The Clearing House, 75(4),186-189. 174 Woolfolk Hoy,A., & Spero, R.B. (2005). Changes in teacher efficacy during the early years of teaching: A Comparison of four measures. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 343-356. Xiaofu, P., & Qiwen, Q. (2007). An analysis of the relation between secondary school organizational elimate and teacher job satisfaction. Chinese Education and Society, 40 (5), 65-77. Yong Z., & Yue, Y. (2007). Causes for burnout among secondary and elementary school teachers and preventive strategies. Chinese Education and Society, 40 (5), 78-85. Yoon, K.S., Duncan, T., Lee, S.W.Y., Scarloss, B.,& Shapley, K. (2007). Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects students achievement. (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2007-No.033). Zainudin, A. (2012). Structural Equation Modelling Using Amos Graphic. Shah Alam: Universiti Teknologi MARA Publication Centre (Uitm Press).

Similar Items