Conditions for effective decentralized governance: The case of Suratthani provincial administrative organization

There are three critical issues facing Suratthani province: first, conflict between central and local government; second, influence of local politicians on the affairs of local government; and third, lack of citizen empowerment. This study, therefore, aims to examine the extent to which those three...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kohklang, Koravit
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
Published: 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/6250/1/s92373_01.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/6250/2/s92373_02.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.6250
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
advisor John Abdullah, Siti Alida
Mohamed, Ahmad Martadha
topic JS Local government Municipal government
spellingShingle JS Local government Municipal government
Kohklang, Koravit
Conditions for effective decentralized governance: The case of Suratthani provincial administrative organization
description There are three critical issues facing Suratthani province: first, conflict between central and local government; second, influence of local politicians on the affairs of local government; and third, lack of citizen empowerment. This study, therefore, aims to examine the extent to which those three issues influence the decentralized governance in Suratthani PAO. This research integrates both quantitative method through questionnaire survey data and qualitative method through interviews. The respondents for this study consist of officials and staff of central government, the PAO administrators, PAO members, community leaders and household heads. The independent t-test and ANOVA were used to test the differences between groups. Pearson correlation analysis was used to test the relationship between the independent and the dependent variables. Linear regression and hierarchical regression analysis were used as the appropriate statistical tools to test the hypotheses. The results show that the relationship between central government and local government, influence of local politicians, and citizen participation significantly affect the effectiveness of the decentralized governance in Suratthani province.
format Thesis
qualification_name Ph.D.
qualification_level Doctorate
author Kohklang, Koravit
author_facet Kohklang, Koravit
author_sort Kohklang, Koravit
title Conditions for effective decentralized governance: The case of Suratthani provincial administrative organization
title_short Conditions for effective decentralized governance: The case of Suratthani provincial administrative organization
title_full Conditions for effective decentralized governance: The case of Suratthani provincial administrative organization
title_fullStr Conditions for effective decentralized governance: The case of Suratthani provincial administrative organization
title_full_unstemmed Conditions for effective decentralized governance: The case of Suratthani provincial administrative organization
title_sort conditions for effective decentralized governance: the case of suratthani provincial administrative organization
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department Ghazali Shafie Graduate School of Government
publishDate 2016
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/6250/1/s92373_01.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/6250/2/s92373_02.pdf
_version_ 1747828044912918528
spelling my-uum-etd.62502021-04-05T03:14:46Z Conditions for effective decentralized governance: The case of Suratthani provincial administrative organization 2016 Kohklang, Koravit John Abdullah, Siti Alida Mohamed, Ahmad Martadha Ghazali Shafie Graduate School of Government Ghazali Shafie Graduate School of Government JS Local government Municipal government There are three critical issues facing Suratthani province: first, conflict between central and local government; second, influence of local politicians on the affairs of local government; and third, lack of citizen empowerment. This study, therefore, aims to examine the extent to which those three issues influence the decentralized governance in Suratthani PAO. This research integrates both quantitative method through questionnaire survey data and qualitative method through interviews. The respondents for this study consist of officials and staff of central government, the PAO administrators, PAO members, community leaders and household heads. The independent t-test and ANOVA were used to test the differences between groups. Pearson correlation analysis was used to test the relationship between the independent and the dependent variables. Linear regression and hierarchical regression analysis were used as the appropriate statistical tools to test the hypotheses. The results show that the relationship between central government and local government, influence of local politicians, and citizen participation significantly affect the effectiveness of the decentralized governance in Suratthani province. 2016 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/6250/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/6250/1/s92373_01.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/6250/2/s92373_02.pdf text eng public Ph.D. doctoral Universiti Utara Malaysia A Consensus Handbook (n.d.). Consensus decision making. Retrieved from http://www.seedsforchange.org.uk/consensus Ball, W. A. (2008). Reinventing budgeting: The impact of third way modernization on local government budgeting. New York: Elsevier Ltd. Barankay, Iwan and Lockwood, Ben. (2006, December). Decentralization and the productive efficiency of government: evidence from Swiss cantons. Retrieved fromhttp://ftp.iza.org/dp2477.pdf Barner, R. (2006). Bench strength: Developing the depth and versatility of your organization’s leadership talent. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data. Chardchawarn, S. (2004). The role of provincial governor: Contemporary politics in thai provinces. PhD Thesis, Kobe University. Chardchawarn, S. (2010). Local Governance in Thailand: The politics of decentralization and the roles of bureaucrats, politicians, and the people VRF. Chiba: Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization. Charoenmueang, T. (2007). A century of thai local government (1897-1997). Bangkok, Thailand: Khrongkan Chatphim Khopfai. Cheema, G. Shabbir and Rondinelli, Dennis A. (Eds). (2007). Decentralizing governance: Emerging concepts and practices. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press. Citizens’ political participation. Retrieved March 29, 2013, from http://region5.prd.go.th/ewt_news.php?nid=798 Daniel, Wit. (1977), Our American government and political system, Illinois: Laidlaw Brothers Publishers. Davidson, M. G. (2003.), Does organizational climate add to service quality in hotels, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 15 April, 169-175. Department for communities and local government. (June 12, 2012). Central government communication and engagement with local government. London: The Stationery Office. From https://www.nao.org.uk/report/central-governments-communication-and-engagement-with-local-government/+&cd=4&hl=en&ct=clnk Enikolopov, R. Z., Ekaterina V. (2006), Decentralization and political institutions, CEFIR Working Paper. Faguet, J.-P. (2003), Decentralization and local government in Bolivia: An overview from the bottom up, London: Development Studies Institute London School of Economics and Political Science University of London. Falleti, Tulia G. (August 2005). A sequential theory of decentralization: Latin American cases in comparative perspective. American Political Science Review, Vol. 99, No. 3, pp. 327-346). Gaventa, J and Valderrama, C. (1999). Participation, citizenship and local governance. Background note prepared for workshop on strengthening participation in local governance institute of development studies, June 21-24. Getkeaw, Viporn.(2012), Research methodology in political science. Bangkok: Ramkhamheang University Press. Grichawat Lowatcharin. Along came the junta: The evolution and stagnation of Thailand’s local governance. Kyoto review of southeast asia. Issue 16, October 2014. Retrieved from http://kyotoreview.org/yav/along-came-the-junta-the-evolution-and-stagnation-of-thailands-local-governance/ Hair, J. F.,et al. ed. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice. Hartnett, Tim. (n.d). Consensus decision-making. From http://consensusdecisionmaking.org/articles/basics%20of%20consensus%20decision%20making.html Hofmeister, W., and Grabow, K. (2011). Political parties: Functions and organisation in democratic societies. Singapore: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung. John-Mary Kauzya (2005), Decentralization: Prospects for peace, democracy and development, division for public administration and development management .United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Journal of Suratthani PAO, April 2012. Kananurog, Rujalugraya. (2007). Local politician in Suratthani. Bangkok: King Prajadhipok’s Institute. Kauzya, John-Mary. (2006). Decentralization and decentralized governance for enhancing delivery of services in transition conditions. Background paper for the regional forum on “Enhancing trust in government through leadership capacity building”, to be held in St.Petersburg, September 28 – 30. From http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan025134.pdf King Prajadhipok’s Institute. (2002). A study and research report on developing indicators of good governance. Report of King Prajadhipok’s Institute to the Office of National Economic and Social Development Board. Kohklang, Koravit. (2009). Local politician in Krabi. Bangkok: King Prajadhipok’s Institute. Laothamatas, Anek (2009), Praethin, pleanthan. Bangkok: Thumasat University Press. Laothamatas, Anek. (2000). A tale of two democracies. Bangkok: Vipasa press. Lapchit, Siriphat. (2007), factors affacting poeple decision to participation in tambol administration organizations in warinchumrab district, Ubonratchathani Province. Thesis. Chulalongkorn University, Thailand. Lertpaithun, Somkit (2007), Law for local government. Bangkok: Thumkamonkarnpim. Lertpaitoon, Somkit. (2001), Local government, Bangkok: King Prajadhipok’s institute. Litvack, Jennie and Jessica Seddon. (1999), Decentralization briefing notes. World Bank Institute Working Paper, The world Bank. Local Initiatives Institution. (n.a.). Politics and participation. retrieved March18, 2013, from www.polsci.chula.ac.th/...book7/_gd5.htm Matson, Jeremy B. and McFarlane, Duncan C. (1999). Assessing the responsiveness of existing production operations. International journal of operations &production management, 19 (8), pp. 765 – 784. From http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01443579910274374 Mektrirattana, Nakarin (2003), Comparative local government of foreign countries. Research Paper. Miller, W., Dickson, M., and Stoker, G. (2000). Models of local governance: public opinion and political theory in Britain. London: Palgrave/Macmillan. Ministry of Commerce Thailand, office of commercial affairs Suratthani. Governor’s office suratthani province “conclude lecture Suratthani 2011”. Nagai, F., Mektrairat, N., & Funatsu, T. (2008). Local government in Thailand: analysis of the local administrative organization survey joint research program series. Chiba: Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization. Napasirigulgit, Vittaya. (1978), Thai local government, Bangkok: Ramkomkheang University Press. Nesbary, D. K. (2000). Survey research and the world wide web. Boston : Allyn and Bacon. Nguyen Khac Hung. (2009). Political and administrative decentralization in Vietnam. Indecentralization policies in Asian Development. Shinichi Ichimura and Roy Bahl Editors. (pp. 225-244). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing. Niloh Wae-u-seng, et al. (2010), The participation of muslim organizations in promoting the good governance of sub-district administrative organization in southern border province, Songklanakarin Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 16 (1), Jan. - Feb. 2010 : 171 – 191. Niyomvech, Anurag. (2011), Political development and participation of the people. Bangkok: Office of the Secretary of the Senate Press. Nunnaly, J. (1978). Psychometric theory. USA: McGraw-Hill Office of decentralization to local government organization committee. (2002), Office to the permanent secretary the Prime Minister’s Office. Office of public sector development commission Thailand. “Transfer missions to the local government organization”. Office of the decentralization to local government organization. “The concept of decentralization”. Retrieved March18, 2013, from http://203.170.239.216/dlocT/plan/viewreport.aspx?repID=32 Office of the permanent secretary. (2003), The hand for decentralization to local governments organization, Bangkok : Kurusapaladphrao press. Office of the prime minister. (2006), National economic and social development plan (10th Plan) 2007-2011, Bangkok: Sutpaisarn Press. Olsen, Hans Bjørn. (2007 November). Decentralization and local governance. From https://www.eda.admin.ch/dam/deza/en/documents/Publikationen/Diverses/167288-decentralisation-local-governance_EN.pdf Parliament. (2012). Civil society in democracy. Bangkok: Parliament Secretary Press. Prachyaprui, Tin. (1995), Terms of public administration. (3rd edition), Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press. Provincial executive integrated committee, Office of Suratthani Province. (2014). The suratthani provincial development plan (B.E. 2558-2561). Mimeographed. Puangngam, Kovit (2005), Thai local government. Bangkok: Winyuchon. Rata-ammarit, Niyom. (1982), Comparative local government, Bangkok:Ramkhamhaeng University Press. Ratadilog Na Puket, Pichai. (2009), Local power structure: Conflict and change, Bangkok: Jaransanitvonggarnpim Press. Reonchaidee, Patthana. (2002), The using problem of the discretion and provincial government service affecting local governments (Provincial administrative organization) in low southern thailand, Songkhla : PSU. Richards L. and Morse, J. (2013). Qualitative methods. (Third Edition). Los Angeles: SAGE. Robson, W. A. (1993). Encyclopedia of Social Science. NewYork: The Macrnillan Company. Rujira Teachanggurn and Surapan Tubsuvan. (2000), Constitutional principles and political institutions, Bangkok : Ramkhamhaeng University Press. Sekaran, U. (2003). Research methods for business: A skill building approach (4Ih ed.). New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons. Sekaran, U. (2006). Research methods for business a skill building approach.New York: John Wiley & Sons. Sekaran, U. & Bougie, R. (2010). Research methods for business: A skill building approach. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Sirisamphan, Thosapon. (2009). Karn boriharn kijakarn banmueng thidi (Good Governance). Bangkok: Sor Asia Press. (in Thai) Sofo, Francesco, Colapinto, Cinzia, Sofo, Michelle and Ammirato, Salvatore. (2013). Adaptive decision making and intellectual styles. New York: Springer. Sri Thawat, Preyapun. (2009), Participation of citizens in democratic development: A case study of the elected mayor of Chiang Mai City, Thailand. Surathani Province. (2011), Master plan of Suratthani 2011-2013. The annual compliance certification for 2554 (2554). Mimeographed. Suratthani Provincial Governor's Office. (2013). Suratthani province in brief 2013. Mimeographed. Suratthani, P. (2012), Plan strategy for development in Pao Suratthani 2012-2015. Suwanmala, Charat. (2004), Civic participation in sub-national governments in Thailand. Faculty of Political Science, Chulalongkorn University Bangkok, Thailand. Sykes, Patricia Lee. (1985), Party leaders: Private goals and public good (great britain, social democratic), London: Yale University Press. Thanomsuk, Mayuree. (2011), Political information perception and political participation by students by undergraduate students majoring in physical and sport in faculty of education and development science, Kasetsart University, Kamphaeng Saen Campus, Bangkok: Kasetsart University. The Secretariat of the House of Representatives. (2007). Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand 2007, Bangkok: The secretariat of the House of Representatives Press. Treisman. Daniel. (2007). The architecture of government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Udom, Thumkosit. (2010), Modern local government: Experience from developed countries, Bangkok: Zatfour Printing. UNDP Oslo Governance Centre. (2009). A users’ guide to measuring local governance. From http://gaportal.org/sites/default/files/LG%20Guide.pdf United Nations Development Programme. (2009). Improving the local administrative structure. Bangkok: United Nations Development Programme. Retrieved from http://www.th.undp.org/content/dam/thailand/docs/ExecutiveSummaryImprovingLocalAdmStructure.pdf United Nations ESCAP. (n.d.). What is good governance? From www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/good-governance.pdf United Nations. (2008). Guidebook on promoting good governance in public-private partnerships. New York: United Nations Publications. Uvanno, Borvornsag et al. (2009), Public participation in public policy processes, Bangkok: King Prajadhipok’s Institute. Vatthanaporn, (2008), The political competition of eight PAOs in the Northern Province, Thailand: Chaingmai University Press. Weerawansa, Saman. (2012), Study factors influencing good governance in local government institutions for achieving quality of life. Srilankan : University of Colombo Press. Wongpreedee, Achakorn. (2007), Decentralization and its effect on provincial political power in Thailand. Bangkok: Nida Press. Worasinchai, Atchara. (2011), Intergovernmental networks in Thailand: The initiative in lampang, kanchanaburi, and rayong provinces. Thesis, Degree Doctor of Philosophy in Development Administration (Development Management) School of Public Administration National Institute of Development Administration. Yamane, T. (1973). Statistics: An introductory analysis. New York: Harperand Row. Yeema, Bukoree (2007), Thai local government. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.