Faktor-faktor peramal kepada amalan interest based bargaining dalam kalangan pemimpin kesatuan sekerja di Sabah

Faktor-faktor peramal kepada amalan interest based bargaining dalam kalangan pemimpin kesatuan sekerja di Sabah

Interest Based Bargaining (IBB) is one of the alternatives approach in collective bargaining that can be practiced by unions and employers to reduce conflicts during negotiation process. However, IBB strategy is not easily accepted by trade unions and employers. Therefore, this research seeks to dev...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kee Y. Sabariah, Kee Mohd Yussof
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
Published: 2015
Subjects:
HF5549-5549.5 Personnel Management
Employment
JQ Political institutions and public administration (Asia)
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/6278/1/s93404_01.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/6278/2/s93404_02.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.6278
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
advisor Johari, Husna
topic HF5549-5549.5 Personnel Management
Employment
JQ Political institutions and public administration (Asia)
spellingShingle HF5549-5549.5 Personnel Management
Employment
JQ Political institutions and public administration (Asia)
Kee Y. Sabariah, Kee Mohd Yussof
Faktor-faktor peramal kepada amalan interest based bargaining dalam kalangan pemimpin kesatuan sekerja di Sabah
description Interest Based Bargaining (IBB) is one of the alternatives approach in collective bargaining that can be practiced by unions and employers to reduce conflicts during negotiation process. However, IBB strategy is not easily accepted by trade unions and employers. Therefore, this research seeks to develop a conceptual framework to identify factors influencing the practice of IBB. These factors consist of conflict management approach, the perceptions of trade unions-employers' relationship, the attitude towards collectivism, the perceptions of unions instrumentality and gender as a moderator. For the purpose of testing the research framework, a quantitative approach using survey method was employed. In this regard, a total of 166 set of questionnaires were distributed and analyzed. Descriptive statistics and inferential statistics approaches were used to analyze the data. This study discovered that the perception of union instrumentality intrinsic and attitude towards collectivism has a significant and positive relationship with the IBB practice. This shows the confidence of the trade unions in fighting for the intrinsic rights of workers and attitude towards collectivism capable of affecting trade union leader’s negotiation with IBB practice. However, the results of hierarchical multiple regression analysis indicated that gender does not play significant role as moderator of the relationship between conflict management approach, perceived union-management relationship, attitude towards collectivism and trade union perception towards instrumentality with IBB practice.
format Thesis
qualification_name Ph.D.
qualification_level Doctorate
author Kee Y. Sabariah, Kee Mohd Yussof
author_facet Kee Y. Sabariah, Kee Mohd Yussof
author_sort Kee Y. Sabariah, Kee Mohd Yussof
title Faktor-faktor peramal kepada amalan interest based bargaining dalam kalangan pemimpin kesatuan sekerja di Sabah
title_short Faktor-faktor peramal kepada amalan interest based bargaining dalam kalangan pemimpin kesatuan sekerja di Sabah
title_full Faktor-faktor peramal kepada amalan interest based bargaining dalam kalangan pemimpin kesatuan sekerja di Sabah
title_fullStr Faktor-faktor peramal kepada amalan interest based bargaining dalam kalangan pemimpin kesatuan sekerja di Sabah
title_full_unstemmed Faktor-faktor peramal kepada amalan interest based bargaining dalam kalangan pemimpin kesatuan sekerja di Sabah
title_sort faktor-faktor peramal kepada amalan interest based bargaining dalam kalangan pemimpin kesatuan sekerja di sabah
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department School of Business Management
publishDate 2015
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/6278/1/s93404_01.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/6278/2/s93404_02.pdf
_version_ 1747828050248073216
spelling my-uum-etd.62782021-03-18T08:23:39Z Faktor-faktor peramal kepada amalan interest based bargaining dalam kalangan pemimpin kesatuan sekerja di Sabah 2015 Kee Y. Sabariah, Kee Mohd Yussof Johari, Husna School of Business Management School of Business Management HF5549-5549.5 Personnel Management. Employment JQ Political institutions and public administration (Asia) Interest Based Bargaining (IBB) is one of the alternatives approach in collective bargaining that can be practiced by unions and employers to reduce conflicts during negotiation process. However, IBB strategy is not easily accepted by trade unions and employers. Therefore, this research seeks to develop a conceptual framework to identify factors influencing the practice of IBB. These factors consist of conflict management approach, the perceptions of trade unions-employers' relationship, the attitude towards collectivism, the perceptions of unions instrumentality and gender as a moderator. For the purpose of testing the research framework, a quantitative approach using survey method was employed. In this regard, a total of 166 set of questionnaires were distributed and analyzed. Descriptive statistics and inferential statistics approaches were used to analyze the data. This study discovered that the perception of union instrumentality intrinsic and attitude towards collectivism has a significant and positive relationship with the IBB practice. This shows the confidence of the trade unions in fighting for the intrinsic rights of workers and attitude towards collectivism capable of affecting trade union leader’s negotiation with IBB practice. However, the results of hierarchical multiple regression analysis indicated that gender does not play significant role as moderator of the relationship between conflict management approach, perceived union-management relationship, attitude towards collectivism and trade union perception towards instrumentality with IBB practice. 2015 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/6278/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/6278/1/s93404_01.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/6278/2/s93404_02.pdf text eng public Ph.D. doctoral Universiti Utara Malaysia Abd. Kadir Hamdan. Pekerja Industri Isu dan Teknik Penyelesaiannya. (Halimah Ma’alip, Ed.). Johor Darul Ta’zim: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Amanatullah, E. T., & Morris, M. W. (2010). Negotiating Gender Roles : Gender Differences in Assertive Negotiating Are Mediated by Women ’ s Fear of Backlash and Attenuated When Negotiating on Behalf of Others, International Journal of Conflict Management 98(2), 256–267. Aminuddin Maimunah. (2013). Malaysian Industrial Relations and Employment Law. (8th edition). Kuala Lumpur : Mc Graw-Hill. Ariffin, R. (2009). Women and trade Unions in Peninsular Malaysia with special reference to MTUC to CUEPACS. Pulau Pinang: Penerbit USM. Bacon, N., & Blyton, P. (2007). Conflict for mutual gains? Journal of Management Studies.44(5),814-834. Barling, J., Kelloway, E. K., & Bremermann, E. H. (1991). Preemployment predictors of union attitudes: The role of family socialization and work beliefs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(5), 725–731. Baron, K. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986). Moderator-mediator variables distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. Bolton, D., Bagraim, J. J., Witten, L., Mohamed, Y., Zvobgo, V., & Khan, M. (2007). Explaining union participation: The effects of union commitment and demographic factors. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 33(1), 74–79. 209 Bamberger, P.A., Kluger, A.N., Abraham, N., & Suchard, R. (1999). The antecedents and consequences of union commitment: A meta- analysis. Academy of Management Journal. 42(3), 304–318. Bowles, H. R., Babcock, L., & Lai, L. (2007). Social incentives for gender differences in the propensity to initiate negotiations: Sometimes it does hurt to ask. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.103 , 84-103. Bryman Alan & Bell Emma.(2007). Business Research Methods.Oxford: Universiti Press. Brislin, R.W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 1 (3), 185-216. Cai, D., & Fink, E. (2002). Conflict style differences between individualists and collectivists. Communication Monographs, 69(1), 67–87. Calhoun S. Patrick & Smith P. Willan. (1999). Integrative Bargaining : Does gender make a difference. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 10(3), 203–224. Chang L.C. (2011). A Comparison of Taiwan and Malaysia in Negotiation Styles. Journal Of International Management Studies, 6 (1),1-8. Cutcher- Gershenfeld,J., Kochan, T. & Wells, J. C. (2001). In whose interest? A first look at national survey data on interest-based bargaining in labour relations. Industrial Relation Journal, 40(1), 1–21. Cutcher-Gershenfeld, J., & Kochan, T. A. (2004). Taking stock: Collective Bargaining at the turn of the century. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 58(1), 3–26. Cutcher-Gershenfeld, J., Kochan, T., Ferguson, J. P., & Barrett, B. (2007). Collective bargaining in the twenty-first century: A negotiations institution at risk. 210 Negotiation Journal. Chua Yan Piaw. (2006a). Kaedah Penyelidikan. Kuala Lumpur : Mc Graw Hill. Chua Yan Piaw. (2006b). Asas Statistik Penyelidikan. Kuala Lumpur : Mc Graw Hill. Chua Bee Seok,Ferlis Bullare & Jamine Adela.(2013).SPSS Prinsip dan Analisis Data dalam Sains Tingkah Laku. Kota Kinabalu: Penerbit Universiti Malaysia Sabah. Daly, T. M., Lee, J. A., Soutar, G. N., & Rasmi, S. (2010). Conflict-handling style measurement: a best-worst scaling application. International Journal of Conflict Management, 21(3), 281-308 Daud, Z. & Tumin, S. (2013). The relationship between employees ’ need and the formation of trade union : the Malaysian manufacturing company’ s experience, Human Resource Management Studies, 4(13), 124–134. DeCotiis,T . A., & LeLouarn,J . (1981). A predictives tudy of voting behavior in a representation election using union instrumentality and work perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance ,27(1),103-118. De Dreu, C. K. W., Evers, A., Beersma, B., Kluwer, E. S., & Nauta, A. (2001). A theory-based measure of conflict management strategies in the workplace. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 645-668. De Dreu, C. K., W., L. R., & Kwon, S. (2000). Influence of social motives on integrative negotiation: a meta-analytic review and test of two theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(5), 889-905. Deborah M. Kolb & Williams J. (2004). Shadow Negotiation and the Interest-Based Approach at Kaiser Permanente. Negotiation Journal, 20(1), 37–46. Deery, S. J., & Iverson, R. D. (2005). Labor-management cooperation : antecedents and impact on organizational performance labor-management cooperation, Industrial & Labour Relations Review, 58(4), 588–609. 211 Deshpande, Satish P. dan Jack Fiorito ( 1989). Specific and general belief in union voting models. The Academy of Management Journal, 32(4), 883-897. Duvall, C. (2009). Making friends of foes : bringing labor and management together through integrative bargaining making friends of foes : bringing labor and management together through integrative bargaining, Journal of Disputes Resolution 1, 2009(1), 197-211. Ed. Rose. (2008). Employment Relation. England: Pearson Education Limited. Fauzi Hussin, J. A. & M. S. Z. (2014). Kaedah Penyelidikan dan Analisis Data SPSS. Sintok: Penerbit Universiti Utara Malaysia. Fonstad, N. O., Mckersie, R. B., & Eaton, S. (2004). Interest-based negotiations in a transformed labor–management setting. Negotiation Journal, 20(1), 5-11. Field Andy.(2013). Discovering Statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics.London : Sage. Fisher, R.,W.Ury &B. Patton (1991). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement with giving in. (2nd.ed). New York : Penguin. Gamage, P. N., & Hewegama, G. V. (2012). Determinants of union participation of public sector organizations in Sri Lanka. Sri Lankan Journal of Human Resource Management, 3(1), 19–31. Garaudel Pierre. (2008). Overcoming the risks of restructuring through the integrative bargaining process: Two case studies in a French context. Human Relation, 61 (9), 1293-1331. Gatchalian, J. C. (1998). Principled negotiations: the key to successful collective bargaining. Management Decision, 36(4), 222–225. Hair, J. F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson,R.E., & Tatham, R. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson International . Hargrove, S. (2010). Interest-based bargaining: achieving improved relationships 212 through collaboration. Library Management, 31(4/5), 229–240. Hinkin, Timothy, Holtom, Brooks C.Klag, M. (2007). Collaborative research: mutually beneficial relationships between researchers and organizations, Organizational Dynamics, 36(1), 105–118. Hofstede, G. (1983). National culture in four dimensions: a research-based theory of cultural differences among nations. International Studies of Management & Organization, 13 (1-2), 46-74. Johari, H. (2006). Union Commitment: A case of two Malaysian Unions (The Amalgamated Union of Employees in Government Clerical and Allied Services and the National Union of Banking Employees) (Tesis PHD),Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang. Johari, H., & Ghazali, S. (2011). Exploring commitment among union members : perspective and direction. Review of Business, 7(4), 104–117. Johnson, David W.& Johnson, Roger T. (2003). “ Field Testing Integrative negotiations”. Peace and Conflict: Journal Of Peace Psychology, 9 (1), 39-68. Kee Mohd Yussof,K.Y.S.(2006). Perundingan kolektif Kesatuan Sekerja Perbankan Sabah (SBEU): Kajian kes di Bank Bumiputra Commerce (M) Berhad dan Bank HSBC (M) Berhad (Tesis Master) Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu. Kee Mohd Yussof,K.Y.S, & Ahmad,M. (2009). Perdebatan Isu Productivity Linked Wages System (PLWS) dalam perundingan kolektif Kesatuan Sekerja Perbankan Sabah. Journal Sosiohumanika, 2(1), 125–140. Kee Mohd Yussof,K.Y.S.(2012, Julai). Persepsi kesatuan sekerja terhadap perubahan perundingan tradisional kepada amalan Interest Base Bargaining. Kertas Kerja dibentangkan di International Malaysian Studies Conference (MSC8), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. 213 Kumar, N., Lucio, M. M., & Rose, R. C. (2013). Workplace Industrial Relations in a Developing Environment: barriers to renewal within unions in Malaysia. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 51(1), 22–44. Kumar, R. (2012). The impact of employment of foreign workers: local employability and trade union roles in Malaysia. Journal of Academic, 2(10), 530–541. Leib Leventhal. (2006). Implimenting Interest Based Negotiation: condition for success with evidence. Dispute Resolution Journal, 61, 50–58. “Len Seng Workers Continue Picket” dlm http://www.labourcentre.org/n.Dilihat pada April 2005. Lewicki, R. J., B. Barry, & D. M. Saunders. ( 2007). Essentials of negotiation (5thed). Boston: McGraw-Hill/Irwin. Lewis Philip, T. A. & S. M. (2003). Employment Relations understanding the employment relationship. England: Prentice Hall. Lytle, A. L., Brett, J. M., & Shapiro, D. L. (1999). In practice rights, and power to resolve disputes, Negotiation Journal, 15(1), 31–51. Ma, Zhenzhong., Erkus, A., & Tabak, A. (2010). Explore the impact of collectivism on conflict management styles: a Turkish study. International Journal of Conflict Management , 21(2), 169-185. Ma, Zhenzhong. (2007). Competing or Accommodating ? An empirical test of Chinese conflict management styles. Contemporary Management Research, 3(1), 1–21. Magenau, J. M., Martin, J. E., & Peterson, M. M. (1988). Dual and unilateral commitment among Stewards and Rank-and-File union members. Academy of Management Journal, 31(2), 359–376. 214 Mahkamah Perusahaan Malaysia kes no. 5/2- 145/08 di antara KesatuanSekerja Bank Sabah dengan Sabah Commercial Banks Association, Award no: 1412 tahun 2008www.amco.org.my/nindustrialcourtaward/1412of2008.pdf dilihat pada 15 Mei 2011. Marican Sabitha . (2006). Penyelidikan Sains Sosial Pendekatan Pragmatik. Kuala Lumpur: Edusystem Sdn Bhd. Mazei, J., Hüffmeier, J., Freund, P. A., Stuhlmacher, A. F., Bilke, L., & Hertel, G. (2015). A Meta-Analysis on Gender differences in negotiation outcomes and their moderators. International Journal Of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 141(1), 85–104. McKercie, R & Cutcher-Gershenfeld, J.(2009). Labor–Management Relations: understanding and practicing effective negotiation. Negotiation Journal, 25(4), 499-514. McKersie, R. B., Sharpe, T., Kochan, T. A., Eaton, A. E., Strauss, G., & Morgenstern, M. (2008). Bargaining theory meets interest-based negotiations: A case study. Industrial Relations,47(1),66-96. McKersie, R., & Cutcher-Gershenfeld, J. (2009). Labor-management relations: Understanding and practicing effective negotiations. Negotiation Journal, 25(4),499-514. Medina, F. J., Povedano, A., Martinez, I., & Munduate, L. (2009). How do we approach accountability with our constituency? Gender differences in the use of influence tactics. International Journal of Conflict Management. 20 (1), 46-59. Metochi, M. (2002). The influence of leadership and member attitudes in understanding the nature of union participation. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 40(1), 87–111. 215 Michael, B., & Michael, R. (2012). Interest Based Bargaining: Innovating from the Basics. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3 (9),40-48. Mike, L. (2007). Exploring Employee Relation (2nd Editio). USA: Elsevier. Miles, E. W. (2010a). Gender differences in distributive negotiation: When in the negotiation process do the differences occur? European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(7).1200-1211. Miles, E. W. (2010b). The role of face in the decision not to negotiate. International Journal of Conflict Management. 21(4).400-414. Miller, J. K., Farmer, K. P., Miller, D. J., & Peters, L. M. (2010). Panacea or Snake Oil? Interest-Based Bargaining in the U.S. Airline and Rail Industries. Negotiation Journal. 26(2).177-201. Mizuno Kosuke .(2006). Possible Way to Stable Industrial Relations in Indonesia: Strength and Weakness of Trade. Proceedings of the 20th AIRAANZ Conference, Volume 2. Australia. University of South Australia: Division of Arts, Education & Social Science. http://www.aomevents.com/conferences/AIRAANZ/RefereedPapers.pdf. Dilihat pada 20 Mei 2011. Moorman, R. H., & Blakely, G. L. (1995). Individualism-Collectivism as an Individual difference predictor of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal Of Organizational Behaviour, 16(2), 127–142. MTUC kecam VSS Hong Leong Bank, gesa JTK dan BNM tanggungjawab dalam http://www.nube.org.my/sidenews14.htm l dilihat pada 25 November 2011 http://my.news.yahoo.com/nube-hong-leong-bank-tidak-boleh-beri-vss-024902005.html dilihat pada 20 November 2011 216 Newton, L.A. & Shore, L.M. (1992). A Model of union membership, Instrumentality, commitment and opposition. The Academy of Management Journal, 17(2), 275–298. Nitish Singh, H. Z. & X. H. (2005). Analyzing the cultural content of web sites. A cross-national comparision of China, India, Japan, and US. International Marketing Review, 22 (I2)129 - 146. NUBE mengegarkan menara Maybank! Dalam http://jerit.org/index.php/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=30 dilihat pada 26 September 2011 . Number Of membership and trade union in Malaysia Year 2005-September 201 (http://jheks.mohr.gov.my/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=145&Itemid=101&lang dilihat pada 23 Oktober 2011. Pallant Julie. (2010). SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using SPSS (4ed.), Australia: McGraw-Hill International. Parasuraman, S., & Simmers, C. A. (2001). Type of employment, work-family conflict and well-being: a comparative study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(5), 551–568. Parasuraman, Balakrishnan and Schwimbersky, Sandra (2005, Oktober). The present scenario of Malaysian industrial relations: accommodating or conflictual? Kertas kerja dibentangkan di ISLSSL Regional Asian Congress in Taipei. Parasuraman, Balakrishnan & SatryaAryana. (2009). The present scenario of Malaysian and Indonesian Industrial Relations: Accomodation or Conflictual. Asian Profile, 37(1), 35-54. Paquet, R.,I.Geatan & J.Berseron (2007). Does Interest-Based Bargaining (IBB) really make a difference in collective bargaining outcomes? Negotiation Journal, 16(3), 281–296. 217 Peetz, D. (1996). Unions, conflict and the dilemma of co-operation. Journal of Industrial Relations, 38(4), 548-570. Peetz, D., & Todd, T. (2000). Globalisation and employment relations in Malaysia. ILO, Bangkok, 1–189. Poon June M. L. (2002). Pengurusan Sumber Manusia. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Posthuma, R. A., White, G. O., Dworkin, J. B., Yánez, O., & Stella Swift, M. (2006). Conflict resolution styles between co‐workers in US and Mexican cultures. International Journal of Conflict Management, 17(3), 242–260. Provis Chris. (2000). Ethics, deception and labor negotiation. Journal Of Business Ethics, 28(2), 145–158. Pruitt, D.G , & Rubin, J. Z. (1986). Social Conflict. New York: Mc Graw-Hill. Rahim, M. A. (2002). Toward a theory of managing organizational conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 13(3), 206. Rognes, J. K., & Schei, V. (2010). Understanding the integrative approach to conflict management. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25(1), 82–97. Rose,R.C.,Kumar,N., & Ibrahim, I.H (2008a) The effect manufacturing strategy on organizational performance. Performance Improvement 47(1),18-25. Rose, R. C., Kumar, N., & Gani, H. (2008b). Unions’ perception toward changing landscape of Industrial Relations in Malaysia. European Journal of Social Sciences, 7 (2),128-1477 Rose,R.C., Kumar, N., & Gani, H. (2008c). Bargaining priorities in the new economy: A survey of Malaysian Employee Unions. Research Journal Of Internasional Studies,7, 32-42. 218 Rose, R.C., Kumar, N., & Ramasamy,N. (2011). Trade Unions in Malaysia: perspectives of employers & employees of unionized companies. The India Journal of Industrial Relations, 46(3), 384-395. Rubin, B., & Rubin, R. (2006). Labor-Management relations : conditions for collaboration. Public Personnel Management,35(4),283-298. Sekaran Uma & Bougie Roger. (2010). Research Methods for Business A Skill Building Approach (5th Edition). United Kingdom: Wiley. Sidek Mohd. Noah. (2002). Reka Bentuk Penyelidikan Falsafah, Teori dan Praktis. Serdang: Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia. Sinclair, R. R., & Tetrick, L. E. (1995). Social exchange and union commitment : a comparison of union instrumentality and union support perceptions, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16 (6), 669-680 Singh, S. K. G. (2009). A study on employee participation in decision making. UNITAR E-Journal, 5(1), 20–38. Sorenson, R. L., Morse, E. A., Savage, G. T., Morse, E. A., & Savage, G. T. (1999). A Test of the motivations underlying choice of conflict strategies in the Dual Concern Model. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 10(1), 25-44. Statistik dan petunjuk-petunjuk utama 2007. Kementerian Sumber Manusia, Jabatan Perhubungan Perusahaan Malaysia (JPPM) Diterbitkan pada Julai 2008 http://10.21.81.24/jppbaru/images/stories/jppm/Statistik_Dan_Petunjuk Petunjuk_Utama_2007.pdf (atastalian) dilihat pada 15 Mei 2011. Storey John & Bacon Nicolas. (1993). Individualism and collectivism into 1990. The International Jounal Of Human Resource Managment, 4(3), 665–684. 219 Syed Arabi Idid. (1998). Kaedah Penyelidikan Komunikasi Dan Sains Sosial. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa Dan Pustaka. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, I,. S. (2014). Using Multivariate Statistics. (6 ed.). USA: Pearson Education, Inc. Tavitiyaman, P., Zhang, H. Q., & Qu, H. (2012). The effect of competitive strategies and organizational structure on hotel performance. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 24(1), 140-159. Tetrick, L. E., Shore, L. M., McClurg, L. N., & Vandenberg, R. J. (2007). A model of union participation: the impact of perceived union support, union instrumentality, and union loyalty. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 820–8. Van Dyne, L., Vandewalle, D., Kostova, T., Latham, M., & Cummings, L. (2000). Collectivism, propensity to trust and self-esteem as predictors of organizational citizenship in a non-work setting. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(1), 3–23. Van de Vliert, E. and Kabanoff, B. (1990) Toward theory-based measures of conflict management. Academy of Management Journal 33:199–209. Villiers, D. De. (1999). Interest Based Bargaining : The role of the trust relationship between employer and employee. SAJEMS NS, 2(3),442-450.2(3), 442–450. Wad, P. (2012). Revitalizing the Malaysian trade union movement: The case of the electronics industry. Journal of Industrial Relations, 54(4), 494–509. Westbrook, K. W., Arendall, C. S., & Padelford, W. M. (2011). Gender, competitiveness, and unethical negotiation strategies. Gender in Management: An International Journal. 26 (4), 289-310. 220 Youngblood S. A., DeNisi A. S., Molleston J. L. & Mobley W. H. (1984) The impact of work environment instrumentality beliefs, perceived labor union image and subjective expected norms on union voting intentions. Academy of Management Journal 27(3), 576–590. Yusof Ab Aziz, Tahir Mohd, Subri & Ismail Mohammad. (2008). Human Resource Management a Holistic Approach. Kuala Lumpur: Arah Publication. Zarankin, T. G. (2008). A new look at conflict styles: goal orientation and outcome preferences. International Journal of Conflict Management, 19(2), 167–184.

Similar Items