Investigating the factors influencing blended learning success for System Analysis and Design Course in Universiti Utara Malaysia

System Analysis and Design (SAD) is one of the core courses offered in Bachelor’s degree programme in Computer Science because its lessons are requisites in becoming system analyst, computer programmer and project leader. However, it is observed that students are not grasping the details of the less...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Duhaim, Saif Muttair
Format:	Thesis
Language:	eng eng
Published:	2016
Subjects:	LB2300 Higher Education
Online Access:	https://etd.uum.edu.my/6540/1/s813700_01.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/6540/2/s813700_02.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-uum-etd.6540
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection	UUM ETD
language	eng eng
advisor	Harun, Nor Hazlyna
topic	LB2300 Higher Education LB2300 Higher Education
spellingShingle	LB2300 Higher Education LB2300 Higher Education Duhaim, Saif Muttair Investigating the factors influencing blended learning success for System Analysis and Design Course in Universiti Utara Malaysia
description	System Analysis and Design (SAD) is one of the core courses offered in Bachelor’s degree programme in Computer Science because its lessons are requisites in becoming system analyst, computer programmer and project leader. However, it is observed that students are not grasping the details of the lessons, and this is affecting their employability and the productivity value in the software development chain. This experience is linked to the presently-used teaching method. In this regard, blended learning model, which improves students’ learning experience and reduces underachievement in computer science, is suggested. Specifically, the generality of the factors that must be considered to achieve students’ academic success in SAD has not been adequately and empirically investigated. This study therefore aims (1) to identify factors that effect the success of blended learning model for the teaching and learning of SAD, (2) to identify the relationship between the success factors and academic success of SAD, and (3) to identify the effects of the success factors on academic success of SAD. To achieve these objectives, a quantitative research method was employed, involving administration of survey instruments distributed to 151 students using simple random sampling, and data collected were analysed using correlation and regression. The study found that students’ attitude, students’ technology usage level, students’ access to technology, students’ courseware, curriculum, learning system interface quality, lecture quality, and e-learning system comprehensiveness positively influence students’ academic success in SAD.
format	Thesis
qualification_name	masters
qualification_level	Master's degree
author	Duhaim, Saif Muttair
author_facet	Duhaim, Saif Muttair
author_sort	Duhaim, Saif Muttair
title	Investigating the factors influencing blended learning success for System Analysis and Design Course in Universiti Utara Malaysia
title_short	Investigating the factors influencing blended learning success for System Analysis and Design Course in Universiti Utara Malaysia
title_full	Investigating the factors influencing blended learning success for System Analysis and Design Course in Universiti Utara Malaysia
title_fullStr	Investigating the factors influencing blended learning success for System Analysis and Design Course in Universiti Utara Malaysia
title_full_unstemmed	Investigating the factors influencing blended learning success for System Analysis and Design Course in Universiti Utara Malaysia
title_sort	investigating the factors influencing blended learning success for system analysis and design course in universiti utara malaysia
granting_institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department	Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts & Sciences
publishDate	2016
url	https://etd.uum.edu.my/6540/1/s813700_01.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/6540/2/s813700_02.pdf
_version_	1747828087505027072
spelling	my-uum-etd.65402021-04-05T02:11:42Z Investigating the factors influencing blended learning success for System Analysis and Design Course in Universiti Utara Malaysia 2016 Duhaim, Saif Muttair Harun, Nor Hazlyna Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts & Sciences Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts and Sciences LB2300 Higher Education QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science System Analysis and Design (SAD) is one of the core courses offered in Bachelor’s degree programme in Computer Science because its lessons are requisites in becoming system analyst, computer programmer and project leader. However, it is observed that students are not grasping the details of the lessons, and this is affecting their employability and the productivity value in the software development chain. This experience is linked to the presently-used teaching method. In this regard, blended learning model, which improves students’ learning experience and reduces underachievement in computer science, is suggested. Specifically, the generality of the factors that must be considered to achieve students’ academic success in SAD has not been adequately and empirically investigated. This study therefore aims (1) to identify factors that effect the success of blended learning model for the teaching and learning of SAD, (2) to identify the relationship between the success factors and academic success of SAD, and (3) to identify the effects of the success factors on academic success of SAD. To achieve these objectives, a quantitative research method was employed, involving administration of survey instruments distributed to 151 students using simple random sampling, and data collected were analysed using correlation and regression. The study found that students’ attitude, students’ technology usage level, students’ access to technology, students’ courseware, curriculum, learning system interface quality, lecture quality, and e-learning system comprehensiveness positively influence students’ academic success in SAD. 2016 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/6540/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/6540/1/s813700_01.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/6540/2/s813700_02.pdf text eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Abdul Hamid, M. S., Rafikul Islam, & Abd Manaf, N. H. (2014). Employability Skills Development Approaches: An Application of The Analytic Network Process. Asian Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 19, No. 1, 93–111, 2014 Agabrian, M. (2007). Relationships Between School and Family: The Adolescents' Perspective, Qualitative Social Research, 8 (1), 1438-5627 Akter, S., D'Ambra, J., & Ray, P. (2011). Trustworthiness in mHealth information services: an assessment of a hierarchical model with mediating and moderating effects using partial least squares (PLS). Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62 (1), 100-116. Al-Barwani, T.A., Al-Ani, W.T. & Amzat, I. H. (2012). An Effective Teaching Model for Public School Teachers in the Sultanate of Oman: Students’ Stance, Education, Business and Society. Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues, 5 (1), 23-46. Almarabeh T, Mohammad H. (2013). E-learning in the Jordanian Higher Education System: Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities, and Challenges araJournal of American Science, 9 (3), 281-287 Alonso, F., Manrique, D., Martinez, L., & Vines, J. M. (2011). How Blended Learning Reduces Underachievement in Higher Education: An Experience in Teaching Computer Sciences, IEEE Transactions On Education, 54 (3), 471 – 478 Al-Otaibi, M. F., Nouby, A. M., Abdul Azizi, H. A., & Alagab, A. M. (2012). Effect of Multimedia Activities In Blended Learning On Listening Skills And Satisfaction In A College English Language Course. Journal of Human Capital Development, 5 (1), 99 – 115. Alshwiah, A. A. S. (2008). The Effects of a Blended Learning Strategy in Teaching Vocabulary on Premedical Students' Achievement, Satisfaction and Attitude Toward English Language. A Thesis of Master’s Degree in Distance Teaching and Training. Distance Teaching and Training Program College of Graduate Studies. Arabian Gulf University Azizan, F. Z. (2010). Blended Learning in Higher Education Institution in Malaysia, Proceedings of Regional Conference on Knowledge Integration in ICT 2010, pp. 454 – 466 Bacon, C. J. & Brian, F. (2001). A Systemic framework for the field of Information Systems. Database for Advances in Information Systems, 32 (2), 46-67. Baldwin, C., Bensimon, E. M., Dowd, A. C., & Kleiman, L. (2011). Measuring student success. New Directions for Community Colleges, 2011: 75–88. doi: 10.1002/cc.438 Banados, E. (2006). A Blended-learning Pedagogical Model for Teaching and Learning EFL Successfully Through an Online Interactive Multimedia Environment. CALICO Journal, 23 (3), 533-550. Barry, R. A. (2010). Teaching Effectiveness and Why It Matters. Portland, OR: Marylhurst University and the Chalkboard Project, Retrieved from http://www.chalkboardproject.org/images/CB_TeachEffctPaper_A3.pdf. Behjat, F., Yamini, M., & Bagheri, M. S. (2012). Blended Learning: A Ubiquitous Learning Environment for Reading Comprehension. International Journal of English Linguistics, 2 (1), 97 – 106. Bennett, S., McRobb, S., Farmer, R. (2010). Object-Oriented Systems Analysis and Design Using UML. 4th Edition: McGraw Hill, United Kingdom. Bersin, J. (2004). The blended learning book: Best practices, Proven Methodologies, and Lessons Learned. John Wiley & Sons. Bett, H. K. (2014). Factors that Students in Strathmore University Consider in Evaluating Teaching Effectiveness. A Disseration for the MSc Education Management, Strathmore University, Nairobi, Kenya. Biggs, J. & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at University: Society for research into Higher Education. Penguin: South Africa Birchall, D. (2005). How to make the most of eLearning for work,” in Proc. eLearning Conf: Towards a Learning Society, Brussels, Belgium, 2005, pp. 53–58. Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Education Goals. Cognitive Domain. Handbook 1, Longman. Bonanno, H., & Jones, J. (2007). The MASUS Procedure: Measuring the Academic Skills of University Students –A Diagnostic Assessment. Learning Centre. The University of Sydney Boud, D., & Prosser, M. (2002). Appraising new technologies for learning: a framework for development. Educational Media International, 39 (3), 237-245. Brooke, E. (2015). Blended Learning: A Basic Overview of Typical Implementation Models and Four Keys to Success. Lexia Learning, pp. 1 – 5 Brooks, C. C. (2000). Knowledge Management and the Intelligence Community. Defence Intelligence Journal, 9 (1), 15-24. Brown., J. D. (2011). Likert items and scales of measurement? SHIKEN: JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter. March 2011. 15 (1) 10-14. Bulmer, M. G. (1979). Principles of statistics. Dover Publications, New York‏.‏ Chen, N-S., Kinshuk, Wei, C-W., Chen, Y-R., & Wang, Y-C. (2007). Classroom Climate and Learning Effectiveness Comparison for Physical and Cyber F2F Interaction in Holistic-Blended Learning Environment, Seventh IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2007) Chew, E., Jones, N. & Turner, D. (2010). Critical review of the blended learning models based on Maslow’s and Vygotsky’s educational theory Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates Cooper, P., & Cefai, C. (2013). Understanding and Supporting Students with Social, Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties: A Practical Guide for Staff in Schools, First Monograph in Resilience and Health European Centre for Educational Resilience and Socio-Emotional Health University of Malta Creswell, J.W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. Third Edition, United States of America, Sage. Currie, D. (2005). Developing and Applying Study Skills. CIPD. Debnath, B. C., Rahman, M. M., Bashir, G.M.M, & Hossain, M. J. (2014). Learning and Evaluation of Blended Learning Approach for ICT Undergraduate Students. International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Information & Communication Technology (ICEEICT) 2014 Delialioğlu, Ö. (2012). Student Engagement in Blended Learning Environments with Lecture-Based and Problem-Based Instructional Approaches. Educational Technology & Society, 15 (3), 310–322. Dennis, A., Wixom, B. H., & Tegarden, D. (2015). Systems Analysis and Design: An Object-Oriented Approach with UML. Wiley. United Kingdom Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J.O. (2001). The Systematic Design of Instruction. (5th Edition). Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers, Inc. Draffan, E. A., & Rainger, P. (2006) A model for the identification of challenges to blended learning ALT-J, Research in Learning Technology Vol. 14, No. 1, March 2006, pp. 55–67 Eison, J. (2010). Using Active Learning Instructional Strategies to Create Excitement and Enhance Learning. Department of Adult, Career & Higher Education University of South Florida, Elmore, R. (2010). Leading the Instructional Core. In Conversation, 11 (3), 1-12. El-Zakhem, I., & Melki, A. (2013). Difficulities In Learning Programming LanguagesAmong Freshman Students. INTED2013 Proceedings, 1202–1206. Emre, E. (2014). A Critical Inquiry: Teaching System Analysis and Design Beyond 2015. 5th annual conference of Computing and Information Technology Research and Education New Zealand (CITRENZ2014) Gagnon, D. A. (2014). Perceptions of Blended Learning: A Case Study on Student Experiences in an Advanced Placement Macroeconomics Course. Doctor of Education in Instructional Technology. Paper 1. Garrison, D., Vaughan, N., D. (2008). Blended Learning in Higher Education: Framework, Principles and Guidelines. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (2008) Gliem, J. A., & Gliem, R. (2003). Calculating, Interpreting, and Reporting Cronbach’s Alpha Reliability Coefficient for Likert-Type Scales, 2003 Midwest Research to Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education, pp. 82 – 88. Graham, C. R., Henrie, C. R., & Gibbons, A. S. (2014). Developing models and theory for blended learning research. In A. G. Picciano, C. D. Dziuban, & C. R. Graham (Eds.), Blended learning: Research perspectives, volume 2 (pp. 13-33). New York, NY: Routledge. Grinnell, R. jr. (ed.). (1993). Social Work, Research and Evaluation, (4th ed), Illinois, F.E Peacock Publishers. Guidry, B. N., Stevens, D. P., & Totaro, M. W. (2011). Preview the systems analysis and design course: an educators’ assessment of the importance and coverage of topics, Journal of Information Systems Education, 22 (4), 331-345. Gustafsson, A., & Johnson, M. D. (2004). Determining attribute importance in a service satisfaction model. Journal of Service Research, 7(2), 124-141. Hadjerrout, S. (2008). Towards a Blended Learning Model for Teaching and Learning Computer Programming: A Case Study. Informatics in Education, 7 (2), 181–210 Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B. y. A., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2010). RE Multivariate Data Analysis. A Global Perspective. Pearson Prentice Hall: UK Heck, R. H. (2008). Teacher Effectiveness and Student Achievement: Investigating a Multilevel Cross-Classified Model. Journal of Educational Administration, 47 (2), 227-249. Hirschheim, R., Klein, H., & Lyytinen, K. (1996). Information Systems Development Data Modeling: Conceptual and Philosophical Foundations. Cambridge: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge. Hoic-Bozic, N., Dlab, M., H., & Mornar, V. (2015), Recommender System and Web 2.0 Tools to Enhance a Blended Learning Model. IEEE Transactions On Education Hossein, S. (2007). Response modeling in direct marketing. Master thesis, Department of business administration and social science, University of Technology, Iran. Huang, D., Leon, S., Hodson, C., La Torre, D., Obregon, N., Rivera, G. (2010). Preparing Students For The 21st Century: Exploring The Effect Of Afterschool Participation On Students’ Collaboration Skills, Oral Communication Skills, And Self-Efficacy. The Publication of the National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Huang, R., Ma, D., & Zhang, H. (2008). Towards a Design Theory of Blended Learning Curriculum, in Hybrid Learning and Education, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 51 (69), 66-78 Iacobucci, D., Saldanha, N., & Deng, X. (2007). A meditation on mediation: Evidence that structural equations models perform better than regressions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 139-153. Jones, N. (2006). E-College Wales, A Case Study of Blended Learning. In C. J. Bonk, C. R. Graham (eds.). Handbook of blended learning: Global Perspectives, local designs. Pfeiffer Publishing, San Francisco, CA. Kerlinger Fred, N., & Lee Howard, B. (2000). Foundations of behavioral research. 4th ed. Harcourt Colleage publishers:Orlando, US. Keshta, A. S., & Harb, I. I. (2013).The effectiveness of a blended learning program on developing Palestinian tenth graders' English writing skills. Education Journal, 2 (6), 208 – 221 Khan, B. H. (2010). E- Learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications. www.badrulkhan.com. Kim, Hea-Suk. (2014). Effects of using mobile devices in blended learning for English reading comprehension, Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 17(2), 64-85. King, S.E. and K.C. Arnold, Blended Learning Environments in Higher Education: A Case Study of How Professors Make It Happen. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 2012. 25(1): p. 44-59 Konradt, U., Filip, R. & Hoffmann, S. (2003) Flow experience and positive affect during hypermedia learning, British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(3), 309–327. Koschmann, T. (2002). Dewey's contribution to the foundations of CSCL research. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning. Foundations for a CSCL Community, International Society of the Learning Sciences. Kuhlthau, C. C. (2010). Guided Inquiry: School Libraries in the 21st Century, School Libraries Worldwide, Volume 16, Number 1, pages 17-28. Lakshman, M., Sinha, L., Biswas, M., Charles, M., & Arora, N. K. (2000). Quantitative Vs qualitative research methods. The Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 67(5), 369–377. doi:10.1007/BF02820690 Lanning, J., Martin, R., Villeneuve-Smith, F. (2008). Employability skills examined: Ten key messages from LSN’s quest to understand employability skills. Learning and Skills Network: London Leary, M. R. (2000). Introduction to behavioral research methods (4 ed.). USA: Pearson Education. Lim, D. H., & Morris, M. L. (2009). Learner and Instructional Factors Influencing Learning Outcomes within a Blended Learning Environment. Educational Technology & Society, 12 (4), 282–293. Marchionini, G. (1991). Information Seeking in Electronic Enviroments, New York: Cambridge University Press Marika, A. T. (2011). A Study of Student Perception on Blended and Online Learning over Traditional Classroom Instruction at South East European University. Proceedings of the ITI 2011 33rd Int. Conf. on Information Technology Interfaces, June 27-30, 2011, Cavtat, Croatia Mcfadzean, E. (2001). Supporting virtual learning groups. Part 1: A pedagogical Perspective Team Performance Management. An International Journal, 7(3), 53—62 Medina-López, C., Alfalla-Luque, R. & Arenas-Márquez, F. (2011). Active learning in Operation Management: Interactive multimedia software for teaching JIT/Lean Production. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 4 (1), 31-80. doi:10.3926/jiem.2011.v4n1.p31-80 Miller, M. (2005). Teaching and Learning in Affective Domain. In M. Orey (Ed.), Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology. Retrieved June 3, 2016, from http://epltt.coe.uga.edu/ Mohammad, A. R. (2006). Key Ingredient in Teaching System Analysis and Design. Presentation in IACIS Fall 2006 Conference, Nevada Morisse, K., Ramm, M., Schuler, T., & Wichelhaus, S. (2009). A Mobile Blended Learning Approach based on Podcasts with respect to the Students’ Media Literacy 2009 International Conference on Mobile, Hybrid, and On-line Learning, pp. 41 – 46 Natasa, H-B., Mornar, V., & Boticki, I. (2009). A Blended learning Approach to Course Design and Implementation, IEEE Transaction On Education, 52 (1), 19 - 30 Neuman, L.W. (2007). Basics of Social Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, 2nd Edition. Pearson International, USA Neumann, D., Neumann, M. M., & Hood, M. (2011). Evaluating computer-based simulations, multimedia and animations that help integrate blended learning with lectures in first year statistics, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(2), 274-289 New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment. (2014). Occupational Outlook. Retrieved from http://www.dol.govt.nz/publications/lmr/occupational-outlook/pdfs/ICT-Business-Systems-Analysts.pdf Ning, Y., & Wuzi, C. (2011). VB Language Program Design Course Teaching under Blended Learning Mode, 2011 Eighth International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD), pp. 2582 – 2585 Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric theory: New York: McGraw-Hill. Nygaard, R., Bihn, G. C., & Shanaberger, D. (2012). Using blended learning to enhance student comprehension of drilling operations: A case history of IADC. Health, Safety, Environment and Training Conference & Exhibition Omni Hotel Houston Westside, Houston, Texas February 7-8 2012. Olson, G. M. & Olson, J. S. (2000). Distance Matters. Human-Computer Interaction, 15 (2), 139-178 Olson, J., Codde, J., deMaagd, K., Tarkleson, E., Sinclair, J., Yook, S., Egidio, R. (2011). An Analysis of e-Learning Impacts & Best Practices in Developing Countries With Reference to Secondary School Education in Tanzania. Information & Communication Technology for Development Osborne, J. W. (2010). Improving your data transformations: Applying the Box-Cox transformation. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 15(12), 1-9. Pallant, J. (2009). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows Australia: Allen & Unwin. Pallant, J. (2011). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows (Version 18). Australia: Allen & Unwin. Pelz, B. (2004). Three principles of effective online pedagogy. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 14(1), 103-116. Poon, J. (2013). Blended Learning: An Institutional Approach for Enhancing Students’ Learning Experiences. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9 (2), 1 -13 Powell, A., Watson, J., Staley, P., Patrick, S., Horn, M., Fetzer, L., Hibbard, L., Oglesby, J., Verma, S. (2015). Blending Learning: The Evolution of Online and Face-to-Face Education from 2008–2015. Promising Practices in Blended and Online Learning, Evergreen Education Group Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers, 36(4), 717-731. Rainalee, M. (2012). Designing introductory programming courses : the role of cognitive load. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 47: 387 Rosen, L. D., Whaling, K., Carrier, L. M., Cheever, N. A., Rokkum, C. (2013). The Media and technology Usage and Attitude Scale: An Empirical Investigation. Computers in Human Behavior, 29 (2013) 2501–2511 Said, H. (2008). Towards a Blended Learning Model for Teaching and Learning Computer Programming: A Case Study. Informatics in Education, 7 (2), 181 – 210 Sakaran, S. R., Sakaran, D., & Bui, T. X. (2000). Effect of Student Attitude to Course Format on Learning Performance: An Empirical Study in Web vs. Lecture Instruction. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 27 (1), 66 – 70 Salmon, G. (2000). E-Moderating: The key to teaching and learning online. London. Kogan Page. Saunders, M., Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A. (2003) Research Methods for Business Students. Harlow: Pearson Education. Sekaran, U. & Bougie, R. (2010). Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach. John Willey and Sons, New York. Sekaran, U. (2003). Research methods for business: a skill building approach. Journal of Education for Business, 68(5), 316-317. Sekaran, U. (2009). Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach, 5th edition, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., United Kingdom Selvi, T. S., & Perumal, P. (2012). Blended Learning for Programming in Cloud Based e-Learning System, in Proceeding of ICRTIT-2012, pp. 197 – 201 Sharma, P., & Barrett, B. (2011). Blended Learning: Using Technology in and beyond the Language Classroom, Language, Learning & Technology, 13 (1), 33 - 39 Shen, X., Gao, D., & Ning, Y. (2014). Study on Blended Learning Supported by Network Curriculum, 2014 International Conference of Educational Innovation through Technology, pp. 105 – 110 Sheneiderman, B. & Plaisant, C. (2010). Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction, 5th Edition, U.S.A. Pearson Higher Education. Smith. (2012). Research Methodology: A Step-by-step Guide for Beginners. So, H.-J. & Bonk, C. J. (2010). Examining the roles of blended learning approaches in computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environments: A Delphi study. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 13 (3), 189-200. Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building Collaborative Knowledge. MIT Press Cambridge, MA. Staker, H. & Horn, M. B. (2012). Classifying K-12 Blended Learning. Innosight Institute. Stephen, C. S. & Margaret T. O. (2001). Benchmarking the Required Information Systems Course in AACSB Accredited MBA Programs: An Analysis of Course Content and Processes." Journal of Computer Information Systems, XXXXI, 38-42. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics (6th ed). New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc. Tang, X., & Pan, Q. (2008). Study on the Application of Blended Learning in the College English Course 2008 International Seminar on Future Information Technology and Management Engineering, pp. 133 – 136 Thompson, L., & Lamshed, R. (2006). E-learning within the building and construction and allied trades. Topi, H., Valacich, J. S., Wright, R. T., Kaiser, K., Nunamaker, Jr., Jay, F., Sipior, J. C., & de Vreede, Gert, J. (2010). IS 2010: Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Information Systems, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 26 (18). Vagias, Wade M. (2006). Likert-type scale response anchors. Clemson International Institute for Tourism & Research Development, Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism Management. Clemson University. Wang, S., & Wang, H. (2014). Redesigning the Information System Analysis and Design Course: Curriculum Renewal, Journal of Computer Information Systems, pp. 30 – 39. Wang, Y. (2008). Blended Learning Design for Software Engineering Course Design, Proceeding of 2008 International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering, pp. 345 – 348 Warger, T.; Dobbin, G. (2009). Learning Environments: Where Space, Technology, and Culture Converge. EduCause White Paper, ELI Paper 1 Wenger, M., S., & Ferguson, C. (2006). A Learning Ecology Model For Blended Learning from Sun Microsoftsystems, In C. J. Bonk, C. R. Graham (eds.). Handbook of blended learning: Global Perspectives, local designs. Pfeiffer Publishing, San Francisco, CA White, G.N., Cordato, D.J., O’Rourke, F., Mendis, R.L., Ghia, D., & Chan, D.K. (2012). Validation of the Stroke Rehabilitation Motivation Scale: A Pilot study, Asian J Gerontol Geriatr, 7: 80- 87 Wilson, J. (2014). Closing the gap with the new primary national curriculum. National College for Teaching and Leasdership for Carmel Education Trust Wirth, K. R., & Perkins, D. (2008). Learning to Learn Available from: http://www.macalester.edu/geology/wirth/CourseMaterials.html Wold, H. (1982). Systems under indirect observation using PLS. In C. Fornell (Ed.), A second generation of multivariate analysis (Vol. 1 ): New York: Praeger. Ya Ni A (2012) Comparing the effectiveness of classroom and online learning: teaching research methods. Journal of Public Administration Education 19(2): 199–215 Yongxing, W. (2008). Blended Learning Design for Software Engineering Course Design, 2008 International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering, pp. 345 - 348 York, T. T., Gibson, C., & Rankin, S. (2015). Defining and Measuring Academic Success. Practical Assesment, Research & Evaluation, 20(5), 1- 8 Zhi, G. C., & Ya, L. Z. (2014). Blended Inquiry Through Blended Learning For Computer Network Course. The 9th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE 2014) August 22-24, 2014. Vancouver, Canada, pp. 830 – 835 Zikmund, W., Babin, B., Carr, J., & Griffin, M. (2010). Business Research Methods South-Western Cengage: Canada.

Investigating the factors influencing blended learning success for System Analysis and Design Course in Universiti Utara Malaysia

Similar Items