Requirements model of collaborative mobile learning (CML)

Mobile technology is one of innovative tools used to facilitate learning. However, the existing studies related to mobile learning (M-learning) have not deeply combined relevant learning approaches for giving a new way that benefits the learning sphere. Accordingly, many researchers believe that the...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Flayyih, Omar Hamid
Format:	Thesis
Language:	eng eng
Published:	2016
Subjects:	LB1025-1050.75 Teaching (Principles and practice) TK6570 Mobile Communication System.
Online Access:	https://etd.uum.edu.my/6546/1/s816295_01.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/6546/2/s816295_02.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-uum-etd.6546
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection	UUM ETD
language	eng eng
advisor	Hussain, Azham
topic	LB1025-1050.75 Teaching (Principles and practice) TK6570 Mobile Communication System.
spellingShingle	LB1025-1050.75 Teaching (Principles and practice) TK6570 Mobile Communication System. Flayyih, Omar Hamid Requirements model of collaborative mobile learning (CML)
description	Mobile technology is one of innovative tools used to facilitate learning. However, the existing studies related to mobile learning (M-learning) have not deeply combined relevant learning approaches for giving a new way that benefits the learning sphere. Accordingly, many researchers believe that there is a need to incorporate pedagogical and instructive models into M-learning technology, especially for supports of team-learning. At the same time, many investigations prove that designers faced challenges in designing systems that involve collaboration with various stationaries. Therefore, researchers suggest for an initiative on more investigations for modern learning in modeling of Mlearning domain. The model should provide rich amount of information through Mlearning for collaborative learning (CL). This comes from understanding, collecting and modeling usable design, holds functionalities and non-functionalities issues to be the corner stone of the intended model. Consequently, this research studies the possibility of modeling an instructional model for Android mobile application combining the CL and M-learning concepts calls Collaborative M-learning (CML) model. Thus, determining the essential requirements by exploring the most important issues in the existing models and related works in the literatures, as well as interviewing learners are the priorities of this study. Content analysis method was used to analyze the gathered data in determining the requirements needed. The model and the prototype have been reviewed and verified by four experts. Also, 43 respondents in the field of Information Technology (IT) have tested the prototype and provided feedback on their acceptance, through Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) questionnaire under the usability evaluation. Results show that their acceptance upon the model is high, validating the functionality of the CML. Such findings recommend that the model is able to improve productivity, showing the technique to utilize mobile technology in CL. This study serves as a guidance for designers and developers in M-learning.
format	Thesis
qualification_name	masters
qualification_level	Master's degree
author	Flayyih, Omar Hamid
author_facet	Flayyih, Omar Hamid
author_sort	Flayyih, Omar Hamid
title	Requirements model of collaborative mobile learning (CML)
title_short	Requirements model of collaborative mobile learning (CML)
title_full	Requirements model of collaborative mobile learning (CML)
title_fullStr	Requirements model of collaborative mobile learning (CML)
title_full_unstemmed	Requirements model of collaborative mobile learning (CML)
title_sort	requirements model of collaborative mobile learning (cml)
granting_institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department	Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts & Sciences
publishDate	2016
url	https://etd.uum.edu.my/6546/1/s816295_01.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/6546/2/s816295_02.pdf
_version_	1747828088815747072
spelling	my-uum-etd.65462021-04-05T02:19:46Z Requirements model of collaborative mobile learning (CML) 2016 Flayyih, Omar Hamid Hussain, Azham Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts & Sciences Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts and Sciences LB1025-1050.75 Teaching (Principles and practice) TK6570 Mobile Communication System. Mobile technology is one of innovative tools used to facilitate learning. However, the existing studies related to mobile learning (M-learning) have not deeply combined relevant learning approaches for giving a new way that benefits the learning sphere. Accordingly, many researchers believe that there is a need to incorporate pedagogical and instructive models into M-learning technology, especially for supports of team-learning. At the same time, many investigations prove that designers faced challenges in designing systems that involve collaboration with various stationaries. Therefore, researchers suggest for an initiative on more investigations for modern learning in modeling of Mlearning domain. The model should provide rich amount of information through Mlearning for collaborative learning (CL). This comes from understanding, collecting and modeling usable design, holds functionalities and non-functionalities issues to be the corner stone of the intended model. Consequently, this research studies the possibility of modeling an instructional model for Android mobile application combining the CL and M-learning concepts calls Collaborative M-learning (CML) model. Thus, determining the essential requirements by exploring the most important issues in the existing models and related works in the literatures, as well as interviewing learners are the priorities of this study. Content analysis method was used to analyze the gathered data in determining the requirements needed. The model and the prototype have been reviewed and verified by four experts. Also, 43 respondents in the field of Information Technology (IT) have tested the prototype and provided feedback on their acceptance, through Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) questionnaire under the usability evaluation. Results show that their acceptance upon the model is high, validating the functionality of the CML. Such findings recommend that the model is able to improve productivity, showing the technique to utilize mobile technology in CL. This study serves as a guidance for designers and developers in M-learning. 2016 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/6546/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/6546/1/s816295_01.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/6546/2/s816295_02.pdf text eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Alarcon, R., Guerrero, L. A., Ochoa, S. F., & Pino, J. A. (2012). Analysis and design of mobile collaborative applications using contextual elements. Computing and Informatics, 25(6), 469–496. Al-Huneidi, A. M., Al-Huneidi, A. M., & Schreurs, J. (2012). Constructivism Based Blended Learning in Higher Education. International Journal: Emerging Technologies in Learning, 7(1), 4–9. doi:http://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v7i1.1792 Alkhazali, A. R. M. (2012). Application of Mobile Tourism for Kedah. Retrieved from doi:http://etd.uum.edu.my/2920/ Allen, S., Graupera, V., & Lundrigan, L. (2010). Pro smartphone cross-platform development: iPhone, blackberry, windows mobile and android development and distribution. Apress. Almutairi, S., Bell, G., & Chen, F. (2013). An enhanced Use Case diagram to model Context Aware Systems. Science and Information Conference (SAI), 2013 (270–274). Al-Rahimi, W. M., Othman, M. S., & Musa, M. A. (2013). Using TAM Model To Measure The Use Of Social Media For Collaborative Learning. International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, 5(2), 90–95. Al-rahmi, W. M., Othman, M. S., & Mi Yusuf, L. (2015). Social Media for Collaborative Learning and Engagement: Adoption Framework in Higher Education Institutions in Malaysia. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(3), 246–252. doi:http://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n3s1p246 Al-Shemarry, M. S. J. (2010). Requirement Model for E-Courses Management System in Iraqi Universities: A Case Study at Thi-Qar Universiti. Universiti Utara Malaysia. Ameller, D., Franch, X., & Cabot, J. (2010). Dealing with non-functional requirements in model-driven development. Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), 2010 18th IEEE International (189–198). Arnold, N., & Paulus, T. (2010). Using a social networking site for experiential learning: Appropriating, lurking, modeling and community building. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 188–196. doi:http://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.04.002 Baran, E., Correia, A.-P., & Thompson, A. (2011). Transforming online teaching practice: critical analysis of the literature on the roles and competencies of online teachers. Distance Education, 32(3), 421–439. dio:http://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2011.610293 Barker, D., Quennerstedt, M., & Annerstedt, C. (2013). Inter-student interactions and student learning in health and physical education: A post-Vygotskian analysis. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, (ahead-of-print), 1–18. Biel, B., Grill, T., & Gruhn, V. (2010). Exploring the benefits of the combination of a software architecture analysis and a usability evaluation of a mobile application. Journal of Systems and Software, 83(11), 2031–2044. dio:http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2010.03.079 Boticki, I. Wong, L. & Looi, C.-K. (2013). Designing Technology for Content-Independent Collaborative Mobile Learning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 6(1), 14–24. doi:http://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2012.8 Bozkurt, A., Ozbek, E. A., Yilmazel, S., Erdogdu, E., Ucar, H., & Guler, E. (2015). February – 2015 Trends in Distance Education Research : A Content Analysis of Journals 2009 - 2013. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(1), 330–363. Brähler, S. (2010). Analysis of the Android Architecture. Os.Ibds.Kit.Edu. Retrieved from http://os.ibds.kit.edu/downloads/sa_2010_braehler-stefan_android-architecture.pdf Causevic, a., Sundmark, D., & Punnekkat, S. (2012). Test case quality in test driven development: a study design and a pilot experiment. In 16th International Conference on Evaluation & Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE 2012) (223–227). dio:http://doi.org/10.1049/ic.2012.0029 Chang, K.-E., Wu, L.-J., Lai, S.-C., & Sung, Y.-T. (2014). Using mobile devices to enhance the interactive learning for spatial geometry. Interactive Learning Environments, 4820(January), 1–19. Cheng, X. (2015). Designing of a Mobile Collaboration Application for Student Collaborative Group Work : Evidence from China. In IEEE CONFERENCE PUBLICATIONS (544–551). doi:http://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2015.72 Cheng, X., Li, Y., Sun, J., & Zhu, X. (2014). Easy Collaboration Process Support System Design for Student Collaborative Group Work: A Case Study. System Sciences (HICSS), 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on. http://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.64 Cheng, X., & Yu, J. (2015). Designing of a Mobile Collaboration Application for Student Collaborative Group Work: Evidence from China. System Sciences (HICSS), 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on.doi:http://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2015.72 Cheong, C., Bruno, V., & Cheong, F. (2012). Designing a Mobile-app-based Collaborative Learning System. Journal of Information Technology Education Innovations in Practice, 11, 97–119. Cowan, P., & Butler, R. (2013). Making geography mobile : using location aware technology to improve student performance in physical geography. Jounal of Research and Didactics in Geography, 1(2), 85–105. doi:http://doi.org/10.4458/0900-09 Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design. SAGE Publications. doi:http://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208956 Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications. Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal Learning Environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3–8. doi:http://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.06.002 Daud, N. M. N., Bakar, N. A. A. A., & Rusli, H. M. (2010). Implementing Rapid Application Development (RAD) methodology in developing practical training application system. Proceedings 2010 International Symposium on Information Technology - System Development and Application and Knowledge Society, ITSim’10. doi:http://doi.org/10.1109/ITSIM.2010.5561634 Dewitt, D., & Siraj, S. (2010). World Journal on Educational collaborative m-learning module. World Journal on Educational Technology, 2(3), 169–185. Retrieved from www.world-education-center.org/index.php/wjet DeWitt, D., Siraj, S., & Alias, N. (2014). Collaborative mLearning: A module for secondary school science. Special Issue: Game Based Learning for 21st Century Transferable Skills: Challenges and Opportunities. JSTOR. Retrieved from http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&PAGE= reference&D=psyc11&NEWS=N&AN=2014-06607-009 Donnelly, R. (2010). Harmonizing technology with interaction in blended problem-based learning. Computers and Education, 54(2), 350–359. doi:http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.012 Egbokhare, F. A. (2014). Causes of Software/Information Technology Project Failures in Nigerian Software Development Organizations. African Journal of Computing and ICT, 7(2), 107–110. Espada, J. P., Crespo, R. G., Martínez, O. S., G-Bustelo, B. C. P., & Lovelle, J. M. C. (2012). Extensible architecture for context-aware mobile web applications. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(10), 9686–9694. Fazlina, S., Manap, A. A., & Rias, R. M. (2013). Mobile learning awareness among students at higher learning institutes : A case study. Proceedings - 2013 International Conference on Informatics and Creative Multimedia, ICICM 2013 (226–229). doi:http://doi.org/10.1109/ICICM.2013.46 Følstad, A., Box, P. O., Law, E. L., Hornbæk, K., & Copenhagen, S. (2012). Analysis in Practical Usability Evaluation : A Survey Study (2127–2136). Garcia, I. A., & Cano, E. M. (2014). Designing and Implementing a Constructionist Approach for Improving the Teaching-Learning Process in the Embedded Systems and Wireless Communications Areas. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 22(October), 481–493. doi:http://doi.org/10.1002/cae.20574 Gikas, J., & Grant, M. M. (2013). Mobile computing devices in higher education: Student perspectives on learning with cellphones, smartphones & social media. Internet and Higher Education, 19, 18–26. doi:http://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.06.002 Goggin, G. (2012). Cell phone culture: Mobile technology in everyday life. Routledge. Green, S. B., & Salkind, N. J. (2010). Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh: Analyzing and understanding data. Prentice Hall Press. Hasan, L., & Abuelrub, E. (2013). Usability testing for IAJIT openconf journal management system. Journal of Software, 8(2), 387–396. doi:http://doi.org/10.4304/jsw.8.2.387-396 Hussain, A., Jomhari, N., Kamal, F. M., & Mohamad, N. (2014). mFakih : Modelling Mobile Learning Game to Recite Quran for deaf Children. International Journal on Islamic Applications in Computer Science And Technology, 2(2), 8–15. Itu. (2013). International Telecom Union Annual Report 2013: Measuring the Information Society. Järvelä, S., & Järvenoja, H. (2011). Socially Constructed Self-Regulated Learning and Motivation Regulation in Collaborative Learning Groups. Teachers College Record, 113(2), 350–374. Khader, A., & Almasri, M. (2014). the Influence on Mobile Learning Based ( Tam ), Mobile Readiness ( Mr ) and Perceived Interaction ( Pi ) for Higher, 1(1), 5–11. Khan, A. U. R., Othman, M., Madani, S. A., & Khan, S. U. (2014). A survey of mobile cloud computing application models. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 16(1), 393–413. doi:http://doi.org/10.1109/SURV.2013.062613.00160 Kirschner, F., Paas, F., Kirschner, P. a., & Janssen, J. (2011). Differential effects of problem-solving demands on individual and collaborative learning outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 21(4), 587–599. doi:http://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011. 01.001 Klassen, A. C., Creswell, J., Clark, V. L. P., Smith, K. C., & Meissner, H. I. (2012). Best practices in mixed methods for quality of life research. Quality of Life Research, 21(3), 377–380. Ko, E. H. T., Chiu, D. K. W., Lo, P., & Ho, K. K. W. (2015). Comparative Study on m-Learning Usage Among LIS Students from Hong Kong, Japan and Taiwan. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(5), 567–577. Koh, Y. H., Rawi, M. F., & Zhang, W. (2011). Learning Anytime, Anywhere: An Ipod Touch Mobile Learning Experience @ Yusof Ishak (YI) Secondary School, Singapore. In World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications (Vol. 2011, pp. 3035–3042). Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/38292/ Koole, M., McQuilkin, J. L., & Ally, M. (2010). Mobile learning in distance education: Utility or futility. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 24(2). Kooloos, J. G. M., Klaassen, T., Vereijken, M., Van Kuppeveld, S., Bolhuis, S., & Vorstenbosch, M. (2011). Collaborative group work: Effects of group size and assignment structure on learning gain, student satisfaction and perceived participation. Medical Teacher, 33(12), 983–988. doi:http://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2011.588733 Laal, M., & Laal, M. (2012). Collaborative learning: what is it? Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 491–495. Laal, M., Naseri, A. S., Laal, M., & Khattami-Kermanshahi, Z. (2013). What do we Achieve from Learning in Collaboration? Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 1427–1432. Lai, C., Wang, Q., & Lei, J. (2012). What factors predict undergraduate students’ use of technology for learning? A case from Hong Kong. Computers & Education, 59(2), 569–579. doi:http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.006 Lai, H.-C., Chang, C.-Y., Wen-Shiane, L., Fan, Y.-L., & Wu, Y.-T. (2013). The implementation of mobile learning in outdoor education: Application of QR codes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(2), E57–E62. doi:http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01343.x Lan, Y.-F., Tsai, P.-W., Yang, S.-H., & Hung, C.-L. (2012). Comparing the social knowledge construction behavioral patterns of problem-based online asynchronous discussion in e/m-learning environments. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1122– 1135. Lee, D., Moon, J., Kim, Y. J., & Yi, M. Y. (2014). Antecedents and consequences of mobile phone usability: Linking simplicity and interactivity to satisfaction, trust, and brand loyalty. Information & Management, 52(3), 295–304. doi:http://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.12.001 Lee, Y. H., Waxman, H., Wu, J. Y., Michko, G., & Lin, G. (2013). Revisit the effect of teaching and learning with technology. Educational Technology and Society, 16(1), 133–146. Liu, I.-F., Chen, M. C., Sun, Y. S., Wible, D., & Kuo, C.-H. (2010). Extending the TAM model to explore the factors that affect Intention to Use an Online Learning Community. Computers & Education, 54(2), 600–610. doi:http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.009 Loncar, M., Barrett, N. E., & Liu, G. Z. (2014). Towards the refinement of forum and asynchronous online discussion in educational contexts worldwide: Trends and investigative approaches within a dominant research paradigm. Computers and Education, 73, 93–110. doi:http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.12.007 McNaughton, D., Light, J., & Naughton, D. M. C. (2013). The iPad and mobile technology revolution: Benefits and challenges for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29(2), 107–116. doi:http://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2013.784930 Moser, M. (2011). Open Source Android Development Tools. Online][Cited: Julio, 2011.] Http://assets. En.Oreilly.com/1/event/61/Open% 20Source%20Android%20Development% 20Tools. Nam, C. W., & Jang, S. (2013). The development of an ID model for collaborative learning in mobile learning environments. Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (TALE), 2013 IEEE International Conference on (207–212). Ng, J. W. P., Zemerly, M. J., & Hammadi, O. A. Al. (2011). Context-aware collaborative mlearning in an intelligent campus environment. In 2011 IEEE GCC Conference and Exhibition, GCC 2011 (63–64). doi:http://doi.org/10.1109/IEEEGCC.2011.5752620 Ostrowski, \Lukasz, & Helfert, M. (2011). Commonality in various design science methodologies. Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS), 2011 Federated Conference on (317–320). Paavilainen, J., Korhonen, H., & Saarenpää, H. (2011). Comparing two playability heuristic sets with expert review method: A case study of mobile game evaluation. Media in the Ubiquitous Era: Ambient, Social and Gaming Media. Pahl, G., & Beitz, W. (2013). Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach (Vol. 11). doi:http://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-319-2 Pegrum, M., Oakley, G., & Faulkner, R. (2013). Schools going mobile: A study of the adoption of mobile handheld technologies in western australian independent schools. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(1), 66–81. doi:http://doi.org/10.1234/ajet.v29i1.64 Peters, V. L., & Hewitt, J. (2010). An investigation of student practices in asynchronous computer conferencing courses. Computers & Education, 54(4), 951–961. Peterson, R. A., & Kim, Y. (2013). On the relationship between coefficient alpha and composite reliability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(1), 194. Popov, V., Biemans, H. J. A., Brinkman, D., Kuznetsov, A. N., & Mulder, M. (2013). Facilitation of computer-supported collaborative learning in mixed- versus sameculture dyads: Does a collaboration script help? The Internet and Higher Education, 19(December), 36–48. doi:http://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.08.002 Power, R. (2013). Collaborative Situated Active Mobile (CSAM) learning strategies: a new perspective on effective mobile learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: Gulf Perspectives, 10(2), 1– 18. Retrieved from http://lthe.zu.ac.ae/index.php/lthehome/article/ view/137 Ravitch, S. M., & Riggan, M. (2011). Reason & rigor: How conceptual frameworks guide research. Sage. Sarrab, M., & Elgamel, L. (2013a). Contextual M-learning system for higher education providers in Oman. World Applied Sciences Journal, 22(10), 1412–1419. doi:http://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2013. 22.10.571 Sarrab, M., & Elgamel, L. (2013b). M Obile L Earning ( M-L Earning ) and. International Journal of Distributed and Parallel System, 3(4), 31–39. doi:http://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v3i4.986 Seliaman, M. E., & Al-Turki, M. . (2012). Mobile Learning Adoption in Saudi Arabia. World Academy of Science, Engineering, and Technology, 6(9), 356–358. Shaltout, M. S. A.-F. (2013). Proposed Model for the Learning Resource Center Based on Cloud Computing. E-Learning “Best Practices in Management, Design and Development of E-Courses: Standards of Excellence and Creativity” , 2013 Fourth International Conference on. doi:http://doi.org/10.1109/ECONF.2013.73 Sironi, M., & Tisato, F. (2013). Capturing Information Flows inside Android and Qemu Environments. arXiv, 1–13. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1302.5109 Small, M. L. (2011). How to Conduct a Mixed Methods Study: Recent Trends in a Rapidly Growing Literature. Annual Review of Sociology, 37(1), 57–86. doi:http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.012809. 102657 Song, Y. (2014). Methodological Issues in Mobile Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (mCSCL): What Methods, What to Measure and When to Measure? .Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 33–48. Strijbos, J. W. (2011). Assessment of (Computer-Supported) Collaborative Learning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 4(1), 59–73. doi:http://doi.org/Doi 10.1109/Tlt.2010.37 Syriani, E., & Ergin, H. (2012). Operational semantics of UML activity diagram: An application in project management. In 2012 2nd IEEE International Workshop on Model-Driven Requirements Engineering, MoDRE 2012 - Proceedings (1–8). doi:http://doi.org/10.1109/MoDRE.2012.6360083 Ting, Y.-L., & Tai, Y. (2013). A New Social Aspect in Collaborative Mobile Learning: Design Challenges and Learning Effects. 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies. doi:http://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2013.13 Violet UML Editor. (n.d.). Retrieved March 6, 2016, from http://alexdp.free.fr/violetumleditor/page.php Vygotsky, L. S. (1934). 1962. Thought and language. Trans. E. Hanfmann and G. Vakar. Cambridge: MIT Press. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. doi:http://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79572-3 Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Wald, M., Li, Y., & Draffan, E. A. (2014). Synote: Collaborative mobile learning for all. Procedia Computer Science, 27, 240–250. Wasserman, A. I. (2010). Software engineering issues for mobile application development. Proceedings of the FSE/SDP workshop on Future of software engineering research (397–400). Wong, L. H., & Looi, C. K. (2011). What seams do we remove in mobile-assisted seamless learning? A critical review of the literature. Computers and Education, 57(4), 2364–2381. doi:http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.007 Wong, S. H. R. (2012). Which platform do our users prefer: website or mobile app? Reference Services Review, 40(1), 103–115. doi:http://doi.org/10.1108/00907321211203667 Wu, Y., Luo, J., & Luo, L. (2010). Porting mobile web application engine to the Android platform. Computer and Information Technology (CIT), 2010 IEEE 10th International Conference on (2157–2161). Yusoff, Z., & Dahlan, H. M. (2013). Mobile based learning: An integrated framework to support learning engagement through Augmented Reality environment. 2013 International Conference on Research and Innovation in Information Systems (ICRIIS) (251–256). doi:http://doi.org/10.1109/ICRIIS.2013.6716718

Requirements model of collaborative mobile learning (CML)

Similar Items