Keutamaan kriteria pengurusan risiko dalam rantaian bekalan kilang kelapa sawit: pendekatan AHP

This study describes the seven components of the inherent risks that exist along the Palm Oil Plant (KMKS) supply chains, which are the Demand Risk (RP), Inventory Risk (RI), Supply Risk (RB), Environmental Risk (RS), Transportation Risk (RA), Delay Risk (RK) and Manpower Risk (RT), in which each ha...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Darwinah, Mohd Darwin Lim
Format:	Thesis
Language:	eng eng eng
Published:	2016
Subjects:	TS155-194 Production management Operations management HD61 Risk Management
Online Access:	https://etd.uum.edu.my/6575/1/Depositpermission-s815105.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/6575/2/s815105_01.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/6575/3/s815105_02.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-uum-etd.6575
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection	UUM ETD
language	eng eng eng
advisor	Osman, Nor Hasni
topic	TS155-194 Production management Operations management HD61 Risk Management
spellingShingle	TS155-194 Production management Operations management HD61 Risk Management Darwinah, Mohd Darwin Lim Keutamaan kriteria pengurusan risiko dalam rantaian bekalan kilang kelapa sawit: pendekatan AHP
description	This study describes the seven components of the inherent risks that exist along the Palm Oil Plant (KMKS) supply chains, which are the Demand Risk (RP), Inventory Risk (RI), Supply Risk (RB), Environmental Risk (RS), Transportation Risk (RA), Delay Risk (RK) and Manpower Risk (RT), in which each has its own elements. 21 units of KMKS in Lahad Datu, Sabah, were selected to participate in this study. The Palm Oil Industry (IMKS) was chosen because it is the major contributor to KDNK. Most past research concerning IMKS focused on competitiveness, sustainability and obstacles in production. However, there is very little study that focused on the main risks which require more attention in the KMKS supply chain management. Face to face interviews were conducted in the early stages to get information about the risks in the supply chain of the plant. It was then followed by the distribution of questionnaires to obtain more detailed data for analysis purposes. This study applied the Saaty method called Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) for measuring the risk weighting components. In addition, the use of AHP was also referred to as an indicator of the level of interest risk in the KMKS supply chain. The analysis shows that KMKS should give priority to the RP component because this risk has the highest value compared to other risks. This is followed by RI, RB, RS, RT, RA and lastly RK. Overall, this study will help the plant in identifying the most important risk that needs to be addressed in advance to avoid any problems along the KMKS supply chain process.
format	Thesis
qualification_name	masters
qualification_level	Master's degree
author	Darwinah, Mohd Darwin Lim
author_facet	Darwinah, Mohd Darwin Lim
author_sort	Darwinah, Mohd Darwin Lim
title	Keutamaan kriteria pengurusan risiko dalam rantaian bekalan kilang kelapa sawit: pendekatan AHP
title_short	Keutamaan kriteria pengurusan risiko dalam rantaian bekalan kilang kelapa sawit: pendekatan AHP
title_full	Keutamaan kriteria pengurusan risiko dalam rantaian bekalan kilang kelapa sawit: pendekatan AHP
title_fullStr	Keutamaan kriteria pengurusan risiko dalam rantaian bekalan kilang kelapa sawit: pendekatan AHP
title_full_unstemmed	Keutamaan kriteria pengurusan risiko dalam rantaian bekalan kilang kelapa sawit: pendekatan AHP
title_sort	keutamaan kriteria pengurusan risiko dalam rantaian bekalan kilang kelapa sawit: pendekatan ahp
granting_institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department	Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business
publishDate	2016
url	https://etd.uum.edu.my/6575/1/Depositpermission-s815105.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/6575/2/s815105_01.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/6575/3/s815105_02.pdf
_version_	1747828095856934912
spelling	my-uum-etd.65752017-11-27T02:04:54Z Keutamaan kriteria pengurusan risiko dalam rantaian bekalan kilang kelapa sawit: pendekatan AHP 2016 Darwinah, Mohd Darwin Lim Osman, Nor Hasni Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business TS155-194 Production management. Operations management HD61 Risk Management This study describes the seven components of the inherent risks that exist along the Palm Oil Plant (KMKS) supply chains, which are the Demand Risk (RP), Inventory Risk (RI), Supply Risk (RB), Environmental Risk (RS), Transportation Risk (RA), Delay Risk (RK) and Manpower Risk (RT), in which each has its own elements. 21 units of KMKS in Lahad Datu, Sabah, were selected to participate in this study. The Palm Oil Industry (IMKS) was chosen because it is the major contributor to KDNK. Most past research concerning IMKS focused on competitiveness, sustainability and obstacles in production. However, there is very little study that focused on the main risks which require more attention in the KMKS supply chain management. Face to face interviews were conducted in the early stages to get information about the risks in the supply chain of the plant. It was then followed by the distribution of questionnaires to obtain more detailed data for analysis purposes. This study applied the Saaty method called Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) for measuring the risk weighting components. In addition, the use of AHP was also referred to as an indicator of the level of interest risk in the KMKS supply chain. The analysis shows that KMKS should give priority to the RP component because this risk has the highest value compared to other risks. This is followed by RI, RB, RS, RT, RA and lastly RK. Overall, this study will help the plant in identifying the most important risk that needs to be addressed in advance to avoid any problems along the KMKS supply chain process. 2016 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/6575/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/6575/1/Depositpermission-s815105.pdf text eng staffonly https://etd.uum.edu.my/6575/2/s815105_01.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/6575/3/s815105_02.pdf text eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Ahmed, A., Kayis, B., & Amornsawadwatana, S. (2007). A review of techniques for risk management in projects. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 14(1), 22-36. Aida, M. (2003). Housing Criteria/Location Selection Using Analytical Hierarchy Process : An University UUM Study. Universiti Utara Malaysia. Akarte, M., Surendra, N., Ravi, B., & Rangaraj, N. (2001). Web based casting supplier evaluation using analytical hierarchy process. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 52(5), 511-522. Akintoye, A. S., & MacLeod, M. J. (1997). Risk analysis and management in construction. International Journal of Project Management, 15(1), 31-38. Azizan, A. A., Darawi, Z., & Mamat, M. N. (2012, 4 – 6 Jun ). Senario Masa Hadapan Pasaran dan Pemasaran Industri Minyak Sawit Malaysia ke arah Perancangan Strategik dalam Peningkatan Daya Saing Global. Paper presented at the Persidangan Kebangsaan Ekonomi Malaysia ke VII (PERKEM VII), Transformasi Ekonomi Dan Sosial Ke Arah Negara Maju, Ipoh, Perak. Basiron, Y. (2007). Palm oil production through sustainable plantations. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology, 109(4), 289-295. Basiron, Y. (2008). Malaysia’s oil palm–Hallmark of sustainable development. Global Oils & Fats Business Magazine, v5, i4. Basiron, Y., & Weng, C. K. (2004). The oil palm and its sustainability. Journal of Oil Palm Research, 16(1). Basterfield, D., Bundt, T., & Nordt, K. (2010). Risk management in electricity markets. Managerial Finance, 36(6), 525-533. Bayazit, O. (2005). Use of AHP in decision-making for flexible manufacturing systems. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 16(7), 808-819. Beamon, B. M. (1998). Supply chain design and analysis: Models and methods. International Journal of Production Economics, 55(3), 281-294. Bernama. (2013). Tiga maut empat cedera kilang sawit di Terengganu meletup. Retrieved from http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/219042 Boehm, B. W. (1989). Software risk management. Washington: IEEE Computer Society Press. Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch model Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences: 2nd. Ed. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. . Briggs, C. A. (2010). An Evaluation Of The Upstream Crude Oil Industry Supply Chain Risk : Leveraging Analytic Hierarchy Process. from www.ugpti.org/events/seminar/downloads/2010-04-08CharlesBriggs.pdf Briggs, C. A., Tolliver, D., & Szmerekovsky, J. (2012). Managing And Mitigating The Upstream Petroleum Industry Supply Chain Risks : Leveraging Analiytic Hierarchy Process. International Journal of Business and Economics Perspectives, 7(1). Bryson, N., & Mobolurin, A. (1994). An approach to using the analytic hierarchy process for solving multiple criteria decision making problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 76(3), 440-454. Carter, C. R., & Rogers, D. S. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(5), 360-387. Chan, F. T., Chan, H., Lau, H. C., & Ip, R. W. (2006). An AHP approach in benchmarking logistics performance of the postal industry. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 13(6), 636-661. Chauvin, C., & Le Bouar, G. (2007). Occupational injury in the French sea fishing industry: A comparative study between the 1980s and today. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 39(1), 79-85. Chee, L. C. (2003). Pengurusan risiko & insurans. Sintok: Penerbit Universiti Utara Malaysia. Cheng, E. W., & Li, H. (2001). Information priority-setting for better resource allocation using analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Information Management & Computer Security, 9(2), 61-70. Childerhouse, P., & Towill, D. R. (2003). Simplified material flow holds the key to supply chain integration. Omega, 31(1), 17-27. Choi, T. Y., & Krause, D. R. (2006). The supply base and its complexity: implications for transaction costs, risks, responsiveness, and innovation. Journal of Operations Management, 24(5), 637-652. Choice, E. (2002). Expert Choice 2000. Pittsburgh, PA: Expert Choice Inc. Choirat, C., & Seri, R. (2001). Analytic Hierarchy Process, A Psychometric Approach. ACSEG (Approaches Connexionnistes en Economie et Sciences de Gestion) Huitieme Recontre Internationale, Rennes, France. Chomeya, R. (2010). Quality of psychology test between Likert scale 5 and 6 points. Journal of Social Sciences, 6(3), 399-403. Chopra, S., & Sodhi, M. S. (2004). Managing risk to avoid supply-chain breakdown. MIT Sloan management review, 46(1), 53-62. Christopher, M. (1998). Logistics and Supply Chain Management: Strategies for Reducing Cost and Improving Service London: Prentice-Hall. Christopher, M., & Lee, H. (2004). Mitigating supply chain risk through improved confidence. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 34(5), 388-396. Christopher, M., Peck, H., Rutherford, C., & Juttner, U. (2003). Understanding supply chain risk: A self-assessment workbook. Department for Transport, Cranfield University, Cranfield. Cook, L. L., & Eignor, D. R. (1991). An NCME Instructional Module on IRT Equating Methods. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 10(3), 37-45. Cooper, M. C., Lambert, D. M., & Pagh, J. D. (1997). Supply chain management: more than a new name for logistics. International Journal of Logistics Management, The, 8(1), 1-14. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications. Cunningham, D. C. (2001). The distribution and extent of agrifood chain management research in the public domain. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 6(5), 212-215. Daugherty, P. J., Richey, R. G., Genchev, S. E., & Chen, H. (2005). Reverse logistics: superior performance through focused resource commitments to information technology. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 41(2), 77-92. Davis, L., & Williams, G. (1994). Evaluating and selecting simulation software using the analytic hierarchy process. Integrated manufacturing systems, 5(1), 23-32. Dey, P. K., & Gupta, S. S. (2001). Feasibility analysis of cross-country petroleum pipeline projects: a quantitative approach. Project Management Journal, 32(4), 50-58. Drake, P. R. (1998). Using the analytic hierarchy process in engineering education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 14(3), 191-196. Enyinda, C., Briggs, C., & Bachkar, K. (2009). Managing risk in pharmaceutical global supply chain outsourcing: applying analytic hierarchy process model. Paper presented at the ASBBS Annual Conference: LasVegas. Feldmann, M., & Muller, S. (2003). An incentive scheme for true information providing in supply chains. Omega, 31(2), 63-73. Ferdows, K., Lewis, M. A., & Machuca, J. A. (2004). Rapid-fire fulfillment. Harvard business review, 82(11), 104-117. Flanagan, R., & Norman, G. (1993). Risk management and construction. Blackwell Scientific: Oxford. Fong, P. S.-W., & Choi, S. K.-Y. (2000). Final contractor selection using the analytical hierarchy process. Construction Management & Economics, 18(5), 547-557. Frair, L., Matson, J. O., & Matson, J. E. (1998). An undergraduate curriculum evaluation with the analytic hierarchy process. Paper presented at the Frontiers in Education Conference. Frohlich, M. T., & Westbrook, R. (2002). Demand chain management in manufacturing and services: web-based integration, drivers and performance. Journal of Operations Management, 20(6), 729-745. Ghoshal, S. (1987). Global strategy: An organizing framework. Strategic management journal, 8(5), 425-440. Haimes, Y. Y. (2004). Risk Modeling, Assessment, and Management (2 ed.). Charlottesville, Virginia: Wiley. HajShirmohammadi, A., & Wedley, W. C. (2004). Maintenance management–an AHP application for centralization/decentralization. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 10(1), 16-25. Hambleton, R. K., & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item Response Theory: Principles and Applications (Vol. 7): Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing. Hasan, H. (2005). Masalah dan halangan penggunaan kontrak ‘partnering’ di Malaysia. (Sarjana Muda Kejuruteraan Awam (Pengurusan Pembinaan)), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Hassan, J. (2012). Sabah Bakal Jadi Pengeluar Kelapa Sawit Ketiga Terbesar Di Dunia. Retrieved from http://www.bernama.com/bernama/state_news/ bm/news.php?cat=sbm&id=667834 Hingley, M., Sodano, V., & Lindgreen, A. (2008). Differentiation strategies in vertical channels: a case study from the market for fresh produce. British Food Journal, 110(1), 42-61. Hubbard, D. W. (2009). The Failure of Risk Management: Why It's Broken and How to Fix It, : John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ, p,211. Hult, G. T. M., Ketchen, D. J., & Slater, S. F. (2004). Information processing, knowledge development, and strategic supply chain performance. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 241-253. Ismail, I., Mohd Arifin, A., & Marwan, N. F. (2006). Implikasi penanaman semula kelapa sawit terhadap peneroka Felda di Jengka Pahang. Jabatan Perangkaan Malaysia (2014). Malaysia : Perangkaan Perdagangan Luar Negeri Bulanan. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Jemily, N. H. B. (2008). Kajian Penilaian Risiko Terhadap Keselamatan Pekerja Pemprosesan Buah Kelapa Sawit [HD61. H239 2008 f rb]. Universiti Sains Malaysia. Johnson, M. E. (2001). Learning From Toys: lessons in managing supply chan risk form the toy industry California Management Review, 43(3), 106-124. Khan, M. K., & Wibisono, D. (2008). A hybrid knowledge-based performance measurement system. Business Process Management Journal, 14(2), 129-146. Kinoshita, E., Sekitani, K., & Shi, J. (2001). Mathematical Structure of Dominant AHP and Concurrent Convergence Method 236-237. Kleindorfer, P. R., & Saad, G. H. (2005). Managing disruption risks in supply chains. Production and operations management, 14(1), 53-68. Knemeyer, A. M., Zinn, W., & Eroglu, C. (2009). Proactive planning for catastrophic events in supply chains. Journal of Operations Management, 27(2), 141-153. Korpela, J., Kylaheiko, K., Lehmusvaara, A., & Tuominen, M. (2002). An analytic approach to production capacity allocation and supply chain design. International Journal of Production Economics, 78(2), 187-195. Kouvelis, P., Chambers, C., & Wang, H. (2006). Supply chain management research and production and operations management: review, trends, and opportunities. Production and operations management, 15(3), 449-469. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educ Psychol Meas, 30, 607-610. Krosnick, J. A. (1999). Maximizing questionnaire quality. Measures of political attitudes, 2, 37-58. Lambert, D. M., & Cooper, M. C. (2000). Issues in supply chain management. Industrial marketing management, 29(1), 65-83. Lee, H. L. (2004). The triple-A supply chain. Harvard business review, 82(10), 102-113. Lee, K. L. (2015). Relationship Of Supply Chain Capabilities And Supply Chain Technology Adoption Towards Supply Chain Operational Performance In Textile And Apparel Industry. Universiti Utara Malaysia. Lembaga Pembangunan Pelaburan Malaysia. (2012). Malaysia prestasi pelaburan : Pelaburan untuk transformasi. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Leonard, L. N., & Cronan, T. P. (2002). A study of the value and impact of electronic commerce: electronic versus traditional replenishment in supply chains. Journal of Organizational Computing and electronic commerce, 12(4), 307-327. Li, S., Ragu-Nathan, B., Ragu-Nathan, T. S., & Rao, S. S. (2006). The impact of supply chain management practices on competitive advantage and organizational performance. Omega, 34(2), 107-124. Liang, W.-Y. (2003). The analytic hierarchy process in project evaluation: an R&D case study in Taiwan. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 10(5), 445-456. Liu, L., Ji, J., Fan, T., Qi, L., & Wu, Z. (2006). Risk management in chemical industry supply chain. Paper presented at the Service Operations and Logistics, and Informatics, 2006. SOLI'06. IEEE International Conference on. London, K. A., & Kenley, R. (2001). An industrial organization economic supply chain approach for the construction industry: a review. Construction Management & Economics, 19(8), 777-788. Lorentz, H. (2008). Production locations for the internationalising food industry: case study from Russia. British Food Journal, 110(3), 310-334. Lu, M. H., Madu, C. N., Kuei, C.-h., & Winokur, D. (1994). Integrating QFD, AHP and benchmarking in strategic marketing. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 9(1), 41-50. Lummus, R. R., & Vokurka, R. J. (1999). Defining supply chain management: a historical perspective and practical guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 99(1), 11-17. Madu, C. N., & Georgantzas, N. C. (1991). Strategic thrust of manufacturing automation decisions: a conceptual framework. IIE TRANSACTIONS, 23(2), 138-148. Manaf, S. Z. A., Din, R., Karim, A. A., Zaid, A. S. M., Hamdan, A., Salleh, N. S. M., et al. (2012). Literasi Asas Penggunaan Komputer Dalam Kalangan Pelajar Tahun Satu Universiti. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia & Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia. Manthou, V., Matopoulos, A., & Vlachopoulou, M. (2005). Internet-based applications in the agri-food supply chain: a survey on the Greek canning sector. Journal of food engineering, 70(3), 447-454. Manuj, I., & Mentzer, J. T. (2008). Global supply chain risk management. Journal of Business logistics, 29(1), 133-155. Matopoulos, A., Vlachopoulou, M., Manthou, V., & Manos, B. (2007). A conceptual framework for supply chain collaboration: empirical evidence from the agri-food industry. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 12(3), 177-186. McCormack, K. (2001). Supply chain maturity assessment: A roadmap for building the extended supply chain. Supply Chain Practice, 3(4), 4-21. Mentzer, J. T., DeWitt, W., Keebler, J. S., Min, S., Nix, N. W., Smith, C. D., et al. (2001). Defining supply chain management. Journal of Business logistics, 22(2), 1-25. Mikkola, M. (2008). Coordinative structures and development of food supply chains. British Food Journal, 110(2), 189-205. Muhammad Shuhaimi, S., & Jafri, M. (2001). Kajian Kemungkinan Aplikasi Konsep Mesin Fmea (Failure Mode And Effect Analysis): Kajian Kes Di Seksyen Mills Di Kilang Keluli. Jurnal Teknologi A(34A), 17-28. Musa, S. N. (2012). Supply Chain Risk Management: Identification, Evaluation and Mitigation Techniques. Ndubisi, N. O., Jantan, M., Hing, L. C., & Ayub, M. S. (2005). Supplier selection and management strategies and manufacturing flexibility. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 18(3), 330-349. Neiger, D., Rotaru, K., & Churilov, L. (2009). Supply chain risk identification with value-focused process engineering. Journal of Operations Management, 27(2), 154-168. Noah, S. M. (2002). Reka Bentuk Penyelidikan. Serdang, Malaysia: Universiti Putra Malaysia. O’Donovan, M. (1997). Risk management and the medical profession. Journal of Management Development, 16(2), 125-133. Omain, S. Z., Hamid, A. B. A., Rahim, A. R. A., & Salleh, N. M. (2010). Supply chain management practices in Malaysia palm oil industry. Paper presented at the The 11th Asia pacific industrial engineering and management systems conference, Melaka, Malaysia. Osman, N. H., & Jemain, A. A. (2003). Keutamaan amalan perniagaan di kalangan usahawan efisien. Paper presented at the Seminar Kebangsaan Sains Pemutusan. Othman, A. A. (2012). Hubungan Strategi Rantaian Bekalan dengan Prestasi Rantaian Bekalan di Dalam Industri Automotif di Malaysia. Universiti Utara Malaysia. Pelham, A. M. (2000). Market orientation and other potential influences on performance in small and medium-sized manufacturing firms. Journal of small business management, 38(1), 48-67. Petroni, A., & Bevilacqua, M. (2002). Identifying manufacturing flexibility best practices in small and medium enterprises. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22(8), 929-947. Piaw, C. Y. (2008). Asas statistik penyelidikan: Analisis data skala ordinal dan skala nominal. Malaysia: McGraw Hill. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of applied psychology, 88(5), 879. Program Transformasi Ekonomi Hala Tuju Untuk Malaysia. (2009). Memuncakkan Industri Minyak Sawit (pp. 304). Rasch, G. (1980). Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests: Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Rice, J. B., & Caniato, F. (2003). Building a secure and resilient supply network Supply Chain Management Review, 7(5), 22-30. Roscoe, J. T. (1975). Fundamental research statistics for the behavioral sciences (2 ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil. (2007). Understanding the Palm Oil Supply Chain. Retrieved from http://philadelphiazoo.org/unless-pdfs/RG-Understanding-the-Palm-Oil-Supply-Chain-Copy.htm Ruin, J. E. (2006). Managing Operational Risk In Organizations. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Dr Josef Eby Ruin Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Saaty, T. L. (1982). Decision Making for Leaders. Belmont, CA: Lifetime Learning Publications. Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 9-26. Saaty, T. L. (1999). Fundamentals of the analytical network process. Paper presented at the Proceeding of ISAHP 1999, Kobe, Japan. Saaty, T. L., & Ramanujam, V. (1983). An objective approach to faculty promotion and tenure by the analytic hierarchy process. Research in Higher Education, 18(3), 311-331. Saaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. G. (1984). Inconsistency and rank preservation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 28(2), 205-214. Sahubar, A., Rosnalini, M., & Bahtiar, J. (2000). Faktor yang Mendorong Wanita Bekerja : satu Tinjauan di UUM. Universiti Utara Malaysia. Salleh, A. L., & Mohammad, M. N. (2007). Worldwide Sourcing Applications of Small and Large Electrical and Electronic Companies in Malaysia. International Review of Business Research Papers, 3(4), 244-253. Santillo, L. (2000). Early fp estimation and the analytic hierarchy process. Proc. ESCOMSCOPE 2000, 249-257. Schoenherr, T., Rao Tummala, V., & Harrison, T. P. (2008). Assessing supply chain risks with the analytic hierarchy process: providing decision support for the offshoring decision by a US manufacturing company. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 14(2), 100-111. Sekaran, U. (2003). Research Methods for Business, A Skill Building Approach (4 ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Shahin, A., & Mahbod, M. A. (2007). Prioritization of key performance indicators: An integration of analytical hierarchy process and goal setting. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 56(3), 225-240. Shamsuritawati, S. (2002). Analisis Pergerakan Harga Minyak Kelapa Sawit Malaysia. Universiti Utara Malaysia. Shamsuzzaman, M., Ullah, A. S., & Bohez, E. L. (2003). Applying linguistic criteria in FMS selection: fuzzy-set-AHP approach. Integrated manufacturing systems, 14(3), 247-254. Shepperd, M., Barker, S., & Aylett, M. (1999). The analytic hierarchy process and almost dataless prediction- Project Control for Software Quality extract.: Shaker Publishing. Shin, H., Collier, D. A., & Wilson, D. D. (2000). Supply management orientation and supplier/buyer performance. Journal of Operations Management, 18(3), 317-333. Simchi-Levi, D., Kaminsky, P., & Simchi-Levi, E. (2000). Design and managing the supply chain. New York: Irwin McGraw-Hill. Singla, S., & Sagar, M. (2012). Integrated risk management in agriculture: an inductive research. Journal of Risk Finance, The, 13(3), 199-214. Sodhi, M. S., Son, B. G., & Tang, C. S. (2012). Researchers' perspectives on supply chain risk management. Production and operations management, 21(1), 1-13. Spekman, R. E., & Davis, E. W. (2004). Risky business: expanding the discussion on risk and the extended enterprise. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 34(5), 414-433. Sun, M., Stam, A., & Steuer, R. E. (1996). Solving multiple objective programming problems using feed-forward artificial neural networks: The interactive FFANN procedure. Management Science, 42(6), 835-849. Svensson, G. (2000). A conceptual framework for the analysis of vulnerability in supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 30(9), 731-750. Ta, H. P., & Har, K. Y. (2000). A study of bank selection decisions in Singapore using the analytical hierarchy process. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 18(4), 170-180. Talib, B. A., & Darawi, Z. (2002). An economic analysis of the Malaysian palm oil market. Oil Palm Industry Economic Journal, 2(1), 19-27. Tan, K., Lee, K., Mohamed, A., & Bhatia, S. (2009). Palm oil: addressing issues and towards sustainable development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13(2), 420-427. Tang, C. S. (2006). Perspectives in supply chain risk management. International Journal of Production Economics, 103(2), 451-488. Tang, O., & Musa, N. S. (2011). Identifying risk issues and research advancements in supply chain risk management. International Journal of Production Economics, 133(1), 25-34. Tavana, M., & Banerjee, S. (1995). Strategic Assessment Model (SAM): A Multiple Criteria Decision Support System for Evaluation of Strategic Alternatives*. Decision Sciences, 26(1), 119-143. Taylor, D. H., & Fearne, A. (2006). Towards a framework for improvement in the management of demand in agri-food supply chains. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 11(5), 379-384. Triantaphyllou, E., & Sánchez, A. (1997). A sensitivity analysis approach for some deterministic multi-criteria decision-making methods. Decision Sciences, 28, 151-194. Triantaphyllou, E., & Shu, B. (2001). On the maximum number of feasible ranking sequences in multi-criteria decision making problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 130(3), 665-678. Van Scoy, R. L. (1992). Software Development Risk: Opportunity, Not Problem (CMU/SEI-92-TR-30, ADA 258743). Pittsburgh, Pa.: Software Engineering Institute: Carnegie Mellon University. Vargas, L. G. (1990). An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 2-8. Vaughan, E. J. (1997). Risk Management. New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Wan Rosmanira, I., Abdul Aziz, J., & Hui, W. P. (2002). Corak Pemilihan Institusi Pengajian Tinggi Menggunakan Proses Hierarki Analisis. Pusat Pengajian Sains dan Matematik, Fakulti Sains dan Teknologi, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Weiss, E. N., & Rao, V. R. (1987). AHP design issues for large-scale systems. Decision Sciences, 18(1), 43-57. Wilkinson, J. H. (1965). The algebraic eigenvalue problem (Vol. 87): New York : Oxford University Press. Yaacob, M. R. (2009). Perniagaan mesra alam: strategi ampuh Malaysia bersaing di peringkat global? Yaakob, M. (2010). Status Teknologi Semasa Dalam PKS Pembuatan Bumiputera di Negeri Kedah. Universiti Utara Malaysia. Yang, J., & Lee, H. (1997). An AHP decision model for facility location selection. Facilities, 15(9/10), 241-254. Yusuff, R. M., Yee, K. P., & Hashmi, M. (2001). A preliminary study on the potential use of the analytical hierarchical process (AHP) to predict advanced manufacturing technology (AMT) implementation. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 17(5), 421-427. Zahedi, F. (1986). The Analytic Hierarchy Process -A Survey of the Method and its Applications. Management Sciences Department, Universiti of Massacchusetts. Zailani, S., & Rajagopal, P. (2005). Supply chain integration and performance: US versus East Asian companies. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 10(5), 379-393. Zikmund, W. G., Babian, B. J., Jon C, C., & Griffin, M. (2013). Business Research Method (9 ed.). Canada: South-Western Cengage Learning. Zsidisin, G. A. (2003). Managerial perceptions of supply risk. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 39(1), 14-26.

Keutamaan kriteria pengurusan risiko dalam rantaian bekalan kilang kelapa sawit: pendekatan AHP

Similar Items