Student engagement, student interactions and 'quality of use' in blended learning using flipped classroom

The research ofblended learning using flipped classroom is still at the early stage, hence the fundamental issues still unclear. Therefore, this study has examined the quality of use, by incorporating the quality constructs for entrepreneurship education. The framework was developed base on 'Q...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Noraini, Nasirun@Hirun
Format:	Thesis
Language:	eng eng eng
Published:	2017
Subjects:	LB1025-1050.75 Teaching (Principles and practice) LB2300 Higher Education
Online Access:	https://etd.uum.edu.my/6755/1/Depositpermission_s95216.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/6755/2/s95216_01.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/6755/3/s95216_02.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-uum-etd.6755
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection	UUM ETD
language	eng eng eng
advisor	Muhammad Noor, Sarina Yusoff, Rushami Zien
topic	LB1025-1050.75 Teaching (Principles and practice) LB2300 Higher Education
spellingShingle	LB1025-1050.75 Teaching (Principles and practice) LB2300 Higher Education Noraini, Nasirun@Hirun Student engagement, student interactions and 'quality of use' in blended learning using flipped classroom
description	The research ofblended learning using flipped classroom is still at the early stage, hence the fundamental issues still unclear. Therefore, this study has examined the quality of use, by incorporating the quality constructs for entrepreneurship education. The framework was developed base on 'Quality of Use' Model underpinned by Luhmann's System Theory, Model of Online Learning and Social Learning Theory: Groups Nets and Sets. There were five variables tested in this study, namely satisfaction, efficiency, effectiveness, student interactions and student engagement. This study was conducted in two phases, firstly this study examined whether blended learning provide impacts on the studied variables. Later this study tested the relationship between variables based on the research framework. Data for the first stage were obtained through quasiexperimental among 90 students of entrepreneurship education for the Semester 201 54 in the Universiti Teknologi MARA Perlis. The results reveals that there were significant differences between treatment group and control group for all variables tested. Data for the second stage were collected through a self-administered survey questionnaires among 281 students of entrepreneurship education for Semester 20162 in the same university. This result reveals that student interactions have a significant relationship with satisfaction, efficiency, effectiveness. However, student engagement exhibits a significant influence to satisfaction, but insignificant influence to efficiency and effectiveness. Further analysis reveals that student interactions provides a partial mediation between student engagement and satisfaction and full mediation between student engagement and efficiency, as well as effectiveness. This study contributes to the development of quality framework for large enrollment in flipped classroom, a multi-method of data collection to ensure the appropriateness of variables selected, and a quality measure of blended learning in entrepreneurship education, as well as business management disciplines. Conclusions, limitation and suggestions for future studies are also highlighted.
format	Thesis
qualification_name	Ph.D.
qualification_level	Doctorate
author	Noraini, Nasirun@Hirun
author_facet	Noraini, Nasirun@Hirun
author_sort	Noraini, Nasirun@Hirun
title	Student engagement, student interactions and 'quality of use' in blended learning using flipped classroom
title_short	Student engagement, student interactions and 'quality of use' in blended learning using flipped classroom
title_full	Student engagement, student interactions and 'quality of use' in blended learning using flipped classroom
title_fullStr	Student engagement, student interactions and 'quality of use' in blended learning using flipped classroom
title_full_unstemmed	Student engagement, student interactions and 'quality of use' in blended learning using flipped classroom
title_sort	student engagement, student interactions and 'quality of use' in blended learning using flipped classroom
granting_institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department	School of Technology Management & Logistics
publishDate	2017
url	https://etd.uum.edu.my/6755/1/Depositpermission_s95216.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/6755/2/s95216_01.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/6755/3/s95216_02.pdf
_version_	1811772580218011648
spelling	my-uum-etd.67552024-07-23T02:55:22Z Student engagement, student interactions and 'quality of use' in blended learning using flipped classroom 2017 Noraini, Nasirun@Hirun Muhammad Noor, Sarina Yusoff, Rushami Zien School of Technology Management & Logistics School of Technology Management & Logistics LB1025-1050.75 Teaching (Principles and practice) LB2300 Higher Education The research ofblended learning using flipped classroom is still at the early stage, hence the fundamental issues still unclear. Therefore, this study has examined the quality of use, by incorporating the quality constructs for entrepreneurship education. The framework was developed base on 'Quality of Use' Model underpinned by Luhmann's System Theory, Model of Online Learning and Social Learning Theory: Groups Nets and Sets. There were five variables tested in this study, namely satisfaction, efficiency, effectiveness, student interactions and student engagement. This study was conducted in two phases, firstly this study examined whether blended learning provide impacts on the studied variables. Later this study tested the relationship between variables based on the research framework. Data for the first stage were obtained through quasiexperimental among 90 students of entrepreneurship education for the Semester 201 54 in the Universiti Teknologi MARA Perlis. The results reveals that there were significant differences between treatment group and control group for all variables tested. Data for the second stage were collected through a self-administered survey questionnaires among 281 students of entrepreneurship education for Semester 20162 in the same university. This result reveals that student interactions have a significant relationship with satisfaction, efficiency, effectiveness. However, student engagement exhibits a significant influence to satisfaction, but insignificant influence to efficiency and effectiveness. Further analysis reveals that student interactions provides a partial mediation between student engagement and satisfaction and full mediation between student engagement and efficiency, as well as effectiveness. This study contributes to the development of quality framework for large enrollment in flipped classroom, a multi-method of data collection to ensure the appropriateness of variables selected, and a quality measure of blended learning in entrepreneurship education, as well as business management disciplines. Conclusions, limitation and suggestions for future studies are also highlighted. 2017 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/6755/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/6755/1/Depositpermission_s95216.pdf text eng staffonly https://etd.uum.edu.my/6755/2/s95216_01.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/6755/3/s95216_02.pdf text eng public Ph.D. doctoral Universiti Utara Malaysia Abran, A., Al-qutaish, R. E., & Desharnais, J. (2005). Harmonization Issues in the Updating of IS0 Standards on Software Product Quality. Metrics News Journal, 10(2), 3544. Abran, A., Khelifi, A., & Suryn, W. (2003). Usability Meanings and Interpretations in IS0 Standards. Software Quality Journal, 11, 325-338. Adams, S. (2016). Clayton Christensen On What He Got Wrong About Disruptive Innovation. Adelman, L., & Member, S. (1991). Experiments, Quasi-Experiments, and Case Studies : A Review of Empirical Methods for Evaluating Decision Support Systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernatics, 21(2), 293-301. Ahmad, S. Z. (2013). The need for inclusion of entrepreneurship education in Malaysia lower and higher learning institutions. Education + Training, 55(2), 191-203. http://doi.org/l0.1108/00400911311304823 Ahmad, S. Z., & Buchanan, R. F. (2015). Entrepreneurship Education in Malaysian Universities. Tertiary Education and Management, 21 (4), 349-3 66. http://doi.org/l0.1080/13583883.2015.1106577 Ahmed, H. M. S. (2010). Hybrid E-Learning Acceptance Model : Learner Perceptions. Decision Sciences Journal of lnnovative Education, 8(2), 313-346. Al-qutaish, R. E., & Abran, A. (2011). A Maturity Model of Software Product Quality. Journal of Research and Practice in Information Technology, 43(4), 307-327. Alias, N. A., Luaran, J. E., & Yahya, R. A. (2014). Regulating Learning through Linking, Flipping and Wrapping. In Blended & Flipped Learning: Case Studies in Malaysian Higher Education Institutions (pp. 105-117). Allen, E., & Seaman, J. (201 1). Going the distance: Online Education in the United States, 2011. Worvorce. Retrieved from http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/highered. html Allen, E., Seaman, J., Poulin, R., & Straut, T. T. (201 6). Online Report Card Tracking Online Education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group. Ally, M. (2005). Foundations of educational theory for online learning. In T. Anderson & F. Elloumi (Eds.), Theory and practice ofonline learning (pp. 3-31). Canada: Athabasca University. Alonso, F., Lopez, G., Manrique, D., & ViAes, J. M. (2005). An instructional model for web-based e-learning education with a blended learning process approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 217-235. http://doi.org/l0.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00454.x Alsagof, Z., Baloch, H., & Hashim, N. (2014). Flipping Large Lectures @ IMU. In Blended & Flipped Learning: Case Studies in Malaysian Higher Education Institutions (pp. 255-274). Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. (1988). Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423. http://doi.org/l0.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 Anderson, T. (2005). Toward a Theory of Onlie Learning. In T. Anderson & F. Elloumi (Eds.), Theory and practice of online learning (pp. 33-60). Canada: Athabasca University. Anderson, T. (2006). Higher Education Evolution: Individual Freedom Affordance by Educational Social Software. In Perspectives on Higher Education in the Digital Age (pp. 77-90). Anderson, T. (2011). The Interaction Equivalency Theorem: Research Potential and Its Application to Teaching. In 27th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching & Learning (pp. 1-6). Retrieved from http://www.uwex.edu/disted/ conference Anderson, T. (2016). Theories for Learning with Emerging Technologies. In Emergence and Innovation in Digital Learning (pp. 35-50). http://doi.org/lO.15215/aupress/9781771991490.01 Anderson, T., & Dron, J. (2014). Teaching Crowds: Learning and Social Media. Teaching Crowds. http://doi.org/10.15215/aupress/ 9781927356807.01 Anderson, T., & Garrison, D. R. (1998). Learning in a Networked World: New Roles and Responsibilities. Distance Learners in Higher Education, 97-112. Arbaugh, J. B. (2014). What Might Online Delivery Teach Us About Blended Management Education? Prior Perspectives and Future Directions. Journal of Management Education (Vol. 38). http://doi.org/lO.l177/1052562914534244 Arbaugh, J. B., Desai, A., Rau, B., & Sridhar, B. S. (2010). A review of research on online and blended learning in the management disciplines: 1994-2009. Organization Management Journal, 7(1), 39-55. http://doi.org/l0.l057/omj.2010.5 Arbaugh, J. B., Godfi-ey, M. R., Johnson, M., Pollack, B. L., Niendorf, B., & Wresch, W. (2009). Research in online and blended learning in the business disciplines: Key findings and possible future directions. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(2), 71-87. http://doi.org/l0.l016/j.iheduc.2009.06.006 Arbaugh, J. B., & Hwang, A. (2015). What Are the 100 Most Cited Articles in Business and Management Education Research, and What Do They Tell Us? Organization Management Journal, 12(3), 154-175. http://doi.org/10.1080/15416518.2015.1073135 Arbaugh, J. B., & Hwang, a. (2012). Uses of Multivariate Analytical Techniques in Online and Blended Business Education: An Assessment of Current Practice and Recommendations for Future Research. Journal of Management Education, 37(2), 229-260. http://doi.org/10.l177/1052562912453919 Baepler, P., Walker, J. D., & Driessen, M. (2014). It's not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers & Education, 78, 227-236. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.006 Baldwin, S., Berkeljon, A., & Loewen, P. J. (2010). Quasi-Experimental Design. In Encyclopedia of Case Study Research (pp. 1172- 1177). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc. Bart, M. (2014). Editorial Note. In Blended and Flipped : Exploring New Models,for Effective Teaching & Learning (Vol. 2014, p. 2). A Magna Publication. Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Borokhovski, E., Wade, C. a., Tamim, R. M., Surkes, M. a., & Bethel, E. C. (2009). A Meta-Analysis of Three Types of Interaction Treatments in Distance Education. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1243-1289. http://doi.org/l0.3102/0034654309333844 Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Borokhovski, E., Wade, C. A., Tamim, R. M., Surkes, M. A., & Bethel, E. C. (2009). A Meta-Analysis of Three Types of Interaction Treatments in Distance Education. Review ofEducationa1 Research, 79(3), 1243-1289. http://doi.org/l0.3102/0034654309333844 Bevan, N. (1995a). Measuring Usability as Quality of Use. Software Quality Journal, 4, 115-150. Bevan, N. (1995b). Usability is Quality of Use. In 6th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction (pp. 1-8). Bevan, N. (1999). Quality in Use: Meeting User Needs for Quality. Journal of Systems and Software, 49(1), 89-96. http://doi.org/lO.1016lS0164-1212(99)00070-9 Bevan, N. (2009). Extending Quality in Use to Provide a Framework for Usability Measurement. In HCI International 2009 (p. 10). Bevan, N., Carter, J., Earthy, J., Geis, T., & Harker, S. (2016). New IS0 Standards for Usability, Usability Reports and Usability Measures. In Human-Computer Interaction. Theory, Design, Development and Practice (pp. 268-278). http://doi.org/l0.4135/9781412982818.n29 Bevan, N., Kirakowski, J., & Maissel, J. (1991). What is Usability ? In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on HCI (pp. 1-5). Bigatel, P. M. (2016). Student Engagement Strategies for the Online Learning Environment. Black, R. (2017). Top Learning Trends for 2017 (According to the Experts). Blaschke, L. M. (2014). Using social media to engage and develop the online learner in self-determined learning. Research in Learning Technology, 22(1063519). http://doi.org/l0.3402/rlt.v22.21635 Bliuc, A.-M., Goodyear, P., & Ellis, R. a. (2007). Research focus and methodological choices in studies into students' experiences of blended learning in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(4), 231-244. http://doi.org/l0.1016/j.iheduc.2007.08.001 Bon, A. T. (2010a). Mengintegrasikan Kejuruteraan dengan Keusahawanan dalam Pendidikan: Ritorik atau Realiti. Persidangan Kebangsaan Pendidikan Kejuruteraan Dan Keusahawanan, (September), 153-164. Bon, A. T. (2010b). New Model and Concept for Technopreneurship Studies in University. Persidangan Kebangsaan Pendidikan Kejuruteraan Dan Keusahawanan, (September), 63-67. Bradford, G., & Wyatt, S. (2010). Online learning and student satisfaction: Academic standing, ethnicity and their influence on facilitated learning, engagement, and information fluency. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(3), 108-114. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.02.005 Bristol, T. (2014). Flipping the Classroom. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 9(1), 43-46. http://doi.org/l0.1016/j.teln.2013.11.002 Butgereit, L., & Osman, I. (2014). Using a " Flipped Classroom " in an Online PhD Programme. In IST-Africa 2014 Conference Proceedings (pp. 1-7). Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research (1st ed.). USA: Library of Congress Catalogue. Campbell, M., Gibson, W., Hall, A., Richards, D., & Callery, P. (2008). Online vs. faceto- face discussion in a Web-based research methods course for postgraduate nursing students: a quasi-experimental study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 45(5), 750-9. http://doi.org/l0.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.12.011 Chaberek-Karwacka, G., & Malinowska, M. (2015). E-learning as a tool for improving access to academic education in the opinion of University of Gdansk students and teachers. Proceedings of 2015 International Conference on Interactive Mobile Communication Technologies and Learning, IMCL 2015, (November), 78-82. http://doi.org/l0.1109/IMCTL.2015.7359559 Chen, H.-J. (2010). Linking employees' e-learning system use to their overall job outcomes: An empirical study based on the IS success model. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1628-1639. http://doi.org/l0.1016/j.compedu. 2010.07.005 Chen, P. S. D., Lambert, A. D., & Guidry, K. R. (2010). Engaging online learners: The impact of Web-based learning technology on college student engagement. Computers and Education, 54(4), 1222-1232. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.008 Chen, Y., Wang, Y., & Chen, N.-S. (2014). Is FLIP enough? Or should we use the FLIPPED model instead? Computers & Education, 79, 16-27. http://doi.org/l0.1016/j.compedu.2014.07.004 Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern Methods for Business Research (pp. 295-336). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2008.12.010 Chin, W. W. (201 0). How to write-up and report PLS analysis. In Handbook of Partial Least Squares (pp. 655-4590). http://doi.org/l0.10071978-3-540-32827-8 Chou, C.-H., & Pi, S.-M. (2015). The Effectiveness of Facebook Groups for e-Learning. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 5(7), 477-482. http://doi.org/l0.7763/IJIET.20 15.V5.553 Christensen, C., Horn, M. B., Caldera, L., & Soares, L. (2011). Disrupting College: How Disruptive Innovation Can Deliver Quality and Affordability to Post secondary Education. Innosight Institute. Retrieved from http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2011/ 02/pdf Christensen, C., Raynor, M. E., & McDonald, R. (2015). What is Disruptive Innovation in Education? Harvard Business Review, (December), 1. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2015112lwhat-is-disruptive-innovation Chua, B. B., & Dyson, L. E. (2004). Applying the IS0 9126 model to the evaluation of an e-learning system. In ASCILITE 2004 (pp. 1-8). Clark, M. H., & Shadish, W. R. (2007). Quasi-Experimental Method. In Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics (pp. 806-809). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc. Cook, D. a., Levinson, A. J., & Garside, S. (2010). Time and learning efficiency in Internet-based learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15(5), 755-770. http://doi.org/l0.1007/s10459-010-9231-X Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Educational Research (Vol. 4). http://doi.org/l0.l017/CB09781107415324.004 Creswell, J. W. (20 14). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (Fourth). Pearson Education. Damanpour, F. (1996). Organizational Complexity and Innovation: Developing and Testing Multiple Contingency Models. Management Science, 42(5), 693-716. http://doi.org/l0.1287/mnsc.42.5.693 Demetriadis, S., & Pombortsis, A. (2007). e-Lectures for flexible learning: a study on their learning efficiency. Educational Technology & Society, 10(2), 147-157. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/ downoad?doi=l0.1.1.119.7249&rep=repl& type=pdf%page=152 Dixson, M. D. (2010). Creating effective student engagement in online courses : What do students find engaging ? Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2), 1-13. Docebo. (201 6). Elearning Market Trends and Forecast 201 7-2021. Drysdale, J. S., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. J., & Halverson, L. R. (2013). An analysis of research trends in dissertations and theses studying blended learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 17, 90-100. http://doi.org/lO.1016/j.iheduc.2012.11.003 Dube, L., & Pare, G. (2003). Rigor in Information Systems Positivist Case Research: Current Practices, Trends, and Recommendations. MIS Quarterly, 27(4), 597-636. Elearning & Government Elearning Magazines. (2014). E-learning User. Study: Corporate Segment. Elliott, K. M., & Shin, D. (2002). Student Satisfaction : An Alternative Approach to Assessing this Important Concept. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 24povember 2012), 197-209. http://doi.org/l0.1080/136008002200001351 Embi, M. A. (2011). e-learning in Malaysian Higher Education Institutions: Status, Trends, & Challanges. (M. A. Embi, Ed.). Kuala Lumpur: Department of Higher Education, Ministy of Higher Education. Embi, M. A. (2014). Blended & Flipped Learning: Case Studies in Malaysian HEIs. (M. A. Embi, Ed.)Ministry of Education Malaysia (1st ed.). Bangi: Centre for Eaching & Learning Technologies UKM & Department of Higher Education Ministry of Education. Embi, M. A., & Hamat, A. (2014). Meaningful Blended Leaning via iFolio@UKM. In Blended & Flipped Learning: Case Studies in Malaysian Higher Education lnstitutions (pp. 60-80). Embi, M. A., Hussain, S., & Panah, E. (2014). Flipped Learning Readiness among Graduate and Postgraduate Students in UKM. In Blended & Flipped Learning: Case Studies in Malaysian Higher Education Institutions (pp. 209-223). Embi, M. A., Mohd Norsin, N., & Panah, E. (2014). Blended Leaning Readiness in Malaysia. In Blended & Flipped Learning: Case Studies in Malaysian Higher Education Institutions (pp. 37-56). Eryilmaz, M. (2015). The Effectiveness Of Blended Learning Environments. Contemporary Issues In Education Research, 8(4), 251-256. http://doi.org/l0.19030/cier.v8i4.9433 Esyutina, M., Fearon, C., & Leatherbarrow, N. (2013). The Bologna process in higher education: an exploratory case study in a Russian context. Quality Assurance in Education, 21(2), 145-161. http:/Idoi.org/lO.1108109684881311310683 Findlay-thompson, S., Saint, M., & Mombourquette, P. (2014). Evaluation of a flipped classroom in an undergraduate business course. Business Education & Accreditation, 6(1), 63-71. Retrieved from http://www.theibfr.com/ARCHIVE/BEA-1V-62N014-revised.pdf%page=35 Finstad, K. (2010). Interacting with Computers The Usability Metric for User Experience. Interacting with Computers, 22(5), 323-327. http://doi.org/l0.1016/j.intcom.2010.04.004 Folmer, E., & Bosch, J. (2004). Architecting for usability: a survey. Journal of Systems and Software, 70(1-2), 61-78. http://doi.org/l0.1016/S0164-1212(02)00159-0 Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 30-50. http://doi.org/l0.1073/pnas.0703993 104 Fuchs, S. (19999). Niklas Luhmann. American Sociological Association, 17(1), 117-119. Gao, F. (2013). A case study of using a social annotation tool to support collaboratively learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 17, 76-83. http://doi.org/lO.lO16/j.iheduc.2012.11.002 Gilbert, J., Morton, S., & Rowley, J. (2007). e-Learning : The student experience. British Journal of Educational Technology, 3 8(4), 560-573. http://doi.org/lO.l11llj.1467- 8535.2007.00723.x Ginns, P., & Ellis, R. (2007). Quality in blended learning: Exploring the relationships between on-line and face-to-face teaching and learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(1), 53-64. http://doi.org/lO.1016/j.iheduc. 2006.10.003 Graham, C. R., Woodfield, W., & Harrison, J. B. (2013). A framework for institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 4-14. http://doi.org/lO.1016/j.iheduc.2012.09.003 Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). SAGE Publications, Inc. Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-152. http://doi.org/l0.2753/MTP1069-6679190202 Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling: Rigorous Applications, Better Results and Higher Acceptance. Long Range Planning, 46(1-2), 1-12. http://doi.org/l0.l016/j.lrp.2013.01.001 Halverson, L. R., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. J., & Drysdale, J. S. (2012). An analysis of high impact scholarship and publication trends in blended learning. Distance Education, 33(3), 381-413 . http://doi.org/lO.l080/01587919.2012.721366 Halverson, L. R., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. J., Drysdale, J. S., & Henrie, C. R. (2014). A thematic analysis of the most highly cited scholarship in the first decade of learning research. The Internet and Higher Education, 20, 20-34. http://doi.org/lO.1016/j.iheduc.2013.09.004 Hanson, J. (201 6). Surveying the experiences and perceptions of undergraduate nursing students of a flipped classroom approach to increase understanding of drug science and its application to clinical practice. Nurse Education in Practice, 16(1), 79-85. http://doi.org/lO.1016/j.nepr.2015.09.001 Hao, Y. (201 6). Exploring undergraduates' perspectives and flipped learning readiness in their flipped classrooms. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 82-92. http://doi.org/l0.1016/j.chb.2016.01.032 Hao, Y., & Lee, K. S. (201 6). Teaching in flipped classrooms: Exploring pre-service teachers' concerns. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 250-260. http://doi.org/lO.1016/j.chb.2015.12.022 Henrie, C. R., Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R. (2015). Measuring student engagement in technology-mediated learning: A review. Computers & Education, 90, 36-53. http://doi.org/l0.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.005 Hew, K. F. (201 1). Students' and teachers' use of Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 662-676. http://doi.org/l0.1016/j.chb.2010.11.020 High, P. (2013). Education Technology Is In Its Infancy But It Is Growing Up Fast. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterhigh/ 201311 2/09/educationtechnologyisinitsinfancy butitisgrowingfastl Ho, J. K. (2013). Providing E-Learning Support to Part-Time Students in Business Disciplines Using Facebook from the Perspective. System Research and Behavioral Science, 97(July 2012), 86-97. http://doi.org/lO.l002/sres Hong, Z., Hong, T., Cui, Z., & Luzhuang, W. (2012). Entrepreneurship Quality of College Students Related to Entrepreneurial Education. Energy Procedia, 17, 1907-1913. http://doi.org/l0.1016/j.egypro.2012.02.331 Horn, M. B., & Staker, H. (2011). The Rise ofK-12 Blended Learning. Hu, Y.-L., Hung, C.-H., Ching, G. S., Hu, Y.-L., & Ching, G. S. (2015). Student-faculty interaction: Mediating between student engagement factors and educational outcome gains. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 4(1), 43-53. http://doi.orgll0.5861/ijrse.2014.800 Hughes, P. J., Waldrop, B., & Chang, J. (2016). Student perceptions of and performance in a blended foundational drug information course. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 8(3), 359-363. http://doi.org/l0.1016/j.cpt1.2016.02.013 Huizer, E. (2016). Freedom, Permissionless Innovation, and a Successful Internet. Educause Review, 44-56. Idri, A., Moumane, K., & Abran, A. (2013). On the Use of Software Quality Standard ISO/IEC9 126 in Mobile Environments. 2013 20th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC), 1-8. http://doi.org/lO.1109/APSEC.2013.12 Idris, I. (2011). TVET Systems, Emerging Challenges and Trends in TVET: Country Perspectives: Malaysia Perspective. In S. Majumdar (Ed.), Emerging Challenges and Trends in TVET in the Asia-PaczJic Region @p. 119-132). Sense Publisher. Islam, M. A., Chittithaworn, C., Rozali, A. Z., & Liang, H. (2010). Factors Affecting E-Learning Effectiveness in a Higher Learning Institution in Malaysia. Jurnal Pendidikun Malaysia, 35(2), 51-60. Jahnke, J. (2010). Student perceptions of the impact of online discussion forum participation on learning outcomes. Journal of Learning Design, 3(2), 27-34. Johannessen, J.-A., Olsen, B., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2001). Innovation as newness: what is new, how new, and new to whom? European Journal of Innovation Management, 4(1), 20-31. http://doi.org/lO.1108/14601060110365547 Junco, R., Heibergert, G., & Loken, E. (2011). The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(2), 119-132. http://doi.org/lO.111l/j.1365-2729.2010.00387.x Kabassi, K., Dragonas, I., Ntouzevits, A., Pomonis, T., Papastathopoulos, G., & Vozaitis, Y. (201 6). Evaluating a learning management system for blended learning in Greek higher education. SpringerPlus, 5(1), 101. http://doi.org/1O. 1186/40064-016-1705-8 Kakosimos, K. E. (201 5). Example of a micro-adaptive instruction methodology for the improvement of flipped-classrooms and adaptive-learning based on advanced blended-learning tools. Education for Chemical Engineers, 12, 1-11. http://doi.org/l0.1016/j.ece.2015.06.001 Kaufhan, H. (2015). A review of predictive factors of student success in and satisfaction with online learning. Research in Learning Technology, 23(1063519), 1-13. http://doi.org/l0.3402/rlt.v23.26507 Kelly, R. (2014). Blended Learning: Integrating Online and F2F. In Blended and Flipped: Exploring New Models for Efective Teaching & Learning (pp. 6-7). A Magna Publication. Kihlstrom, a. (2011). Luhmann's system theory in social work: Criticism and reflections. Journal of Social Work, 12(3), 287-299. http://doi.org/l0.1177/1468017310386425 Kim, M. K., Kim, S. M., Khera, O., & Getrnan, J. (2014). The experience of three flipped classrooms in an urban university: an exploration of design principles. The Internet and Higher Education, 22, 37-50. http://doi.org/lO.1016/j.iheduc.2014.04.003 King, A. A., & Baatartogtokh, B. (2015). How useful is the theory of disruptive innovation? MITSloan Management Review, 57(1), 77-90. Kisekka, V., Bagchi-Sen, S., & Raghav Rao, H. (201 3). Extent of private information disclosure on online social networks: An exploration of Facebook mobile phone users. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2722-2729. http://doi.org/lO.l016/j.chb.2013.07.023 Kiviniemi, M. T. (2014). Effects of a blended learning approach on student outcomes in a graduate-level public health course. BMC Medical Education, 14(47), 1-7. http://doi.org/lO.118611472-6920-14-47 KO, J. W., Park, S., Yu, H. S., Kim, S.-J., & Kim, D. M. (2016). The Structural Relationship Between Student Engagement and Learning Outcomes in Korea. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(1), 147-157. http://doi.org/lO.1007/s40299-015-0245-2 Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2008). Murketing Management. Pearson. Kratochvil, J. (2014). Efficiency of e-learning in an information literacy course for medical students at the Masaryk University. The Electronic Library, 32(3), 322-340. http://doi.org/l0.11081EL-07-2012-0087 Krejcie, R. V, & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610. Kuo, Y.-C., & Belland, B. R. (2016). An exploratory study of adult learners' perceptions of online learning: Minority students in continuing education. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 64(4), 661-680. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/lO1.007/ s11423-016-9442-9 Kuo, Y.-C., Walker, A. E., Belland, B. R., & Schroder, K. E. E. (2013). A Predictive Study of Student Satisfaction in Online Education Programs. International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning, 14(1), 16-39. Retrieved from http://content.ebscohost.com/ContentServer.asp? T=P&P=AN&K=85965741&S=R&D=ehh&EbscoContent= dGJyMNLr40SeprA4v+bwOLCmrOuep7JSsKu4TLSWxWXS& ContentCustomer=dGJyMPGqtk22qL~43~~%5Cn http://libproxy.unm.edu/login?url=http://search. ebscohost.com/login.aspx?d Kuo, Y.-C., Walker, A. E., Schroder, K. E. E., & Belland, B. R. (2014). Interaction, Internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 20, 35-50. http://doi.org/l0.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.001 Ladhari, R. (2010). Developing e-service quality scales: A literature review. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 17(6), 464-477. http://doi.org/lO.1016/j.jretconser.2010.06.003 Lee, B., Barua, A., & Whinston, A. B. (1997). Discovery and Representation of Causal Relationships in MIS Research : A Methodological Framework. MIS Quarterly, 21(1), 109-136. Lei, J., Xu, L., Meng, Q., Zhang, J., & Gong, Y. (2014). The current status of usability studies of information technologies in China: A systematic study. BioMed Research International, 2014. http://doi.org/l0.1155/2014/568303 Lei Chang. (1994). A Psychometric Evaluation of 4-Point and 6-Point Likert-Type Scales in Relation to Reliability and Validity. Applied Psychological Measurement, 18(3), 205-215. http://doi.org/lO.1177/014662169401800302 Liebert, C. A., Lin, D. T., Mazer, L. M., Bereknyei, S., & Lau, J. N. (2016). Effectiveness of the Surgery Core Clerkship Flipped Classroom: A prospective cohort trial. American Journal of Surgery, 211(2), 451-457.el. http://doi.org/l0.l016/j.amjsurg.2015.10.004 Liebert, C. A., Mazer, L., Bereknyei Merrell, S., Lin, D. T., & Lau, J. N. (2016). Student perceptions of a simulation-based flipped classroom for the surgery clerkship: A mixed-methods study. Surgery (United States), 160(3), 591-598. http:/Idoi.org/lO. 1016/j.surg.2016.03.034 Lim, F. C. B. (2009). Education hub at a crossroads: The development of quality assurance as a competitive tool for Singapore's private tertiary education. Quality Assurance in Education, 17(1), 79-94. http://doi.org/l0.1108/0968488091 0929944 Lindeman, B. M., Law, J. K., Lipsett, P. A., Arbella, T., Stem, M., & Lidor, A. 0. (2015). A blended online curriculum in the basic surgery clerkship: A pilot study. American Journal of surgery, 209(1), 145-151. http:Ndoi.org/l0.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.10.003 Loh, H., Razmi, R., Ali, M., Abdul, B., Salleh, Z., & Ahmad, A. (2015). Entrepreneurial University : A Case of Universiti Teknologi MARA. International Academic Research Journal of Social Science, 1 (2), 224-231. Maglajlic, S. (2012). Efficiency in E-Learning: Can learning outcomes be improved by using social networks of trainees and tutors? Economics, Management, and Financial Markets, 7(4), 121-137. http://doi.org/lO.1109/ICL.2012. 6402088 Man, C. K., & Kian, S. H. (2014). Morpheus UNIMAS: Strenghthening Student Engagement in Blended Learning Environemnt. In Blended & Flipped Learning: Case Studies in Malaysian Higher Education Institutions (pp. 121-132). Margaryan, A., Bianco, M., & Littlejohn, A. (2014). Instructional Quality of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). Computers & Education, 80, 77-83. http://doi.org/lO.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.005 Markewitz, L. A. (2007). Student-Student Interaction In An Online Continuing Professional Development Course: Testing Anderson's Equivalency Theorem. Retrieved from http://auspace.athabascau.ca:8O8O/handle/2149/ 3057%5Cnhttp:Nequivalencytheorem.info/?page-id=20 Markides, C. (2006). Disruptive innovation: In need of better theory. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(1), 19-25. http://doi.org/lO.1111lj.1540-5885.2005.00177.x Martinez-argiielles, M. J., & Callejo, M. B. (2013). Dimensions of Perceived Service Quality in Higher Education Virtual Learning Environments. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal (R USC), 10(1), 268-285. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/l0.7238/rusc.vl Oil.1411 McKenzie, W. a., Perini, E., Rohlf, V., Toukhsati, S., Conduit, R., & Sanson, G. (2013). A blended learning lecture delivery model for large and diverse undergraduate cohorts. Computers & Education, 64, 116-126. http://doi.org/l0.1016/j.compedu.2013.01.009 McLaughlin, J. E., & Rhoney, D. H. (2015). Comparison of an interactive e-learning preparatory tool and a conventional downloadable handout used within a flipped neurologic pharmacotherapy lecture. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 7(1), 12-19. http://doi.org/l0.101 6/j.cpt1.2014.09.016 McLaughlin, J. E., Roth, M. T., Glatt, D. M., Gharkholonarehe, N., Davidson, C. A., Griffin, L. M., ... Mumper, R. J. (2014). The Flipped Classroom: A Course Redesign to Foster Learning and Engagement in a Health Professions School. Academic Medicine, 89(2), 236-243. http://doi.org/lO.1097/ACM.0000000000000086 Md. Saad, M. N., Selamat, A. W., & Ahmad, M. A. (2014). Blended Learning in UPSI. In Blended & Flipped Learning: Case Studies in Malaysian Higher Education Institutions (pp. 179-192). Md Fhalib, M. F., Mat Daud, N., & Shahir, M. S. (2014). Investigating Faculty Adoption of Blended Learning. In Blended & Flipped Learning: Case Studies in Malaysian Higher Education Institutions (pp. 135-144). Md Osman, S. Z., Jamaludin, R., & Fathil, N. F. (2016). An Analysis of Using Online Video Lecture on Learning Outcome : The Mediating Role of Student Interaction and Student Engagement. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 3(2), 57-64. http://doi.org/l0.20448/journa1.509/2016.3.2/ 509.2.57.64 Meyer, K. A. (2014). Student Engagement in Online Learning: What Works and Why. In ASHE Higher Education Report (Vol. 40, pp. 1-114). http://doi.org/l0.1002/aehe.20018 Milne, B. A. J. (2007). Entering the Interaction Age Today. Educause Review, (January/February), 13-31. Mohd. Yusoff, N., Abdul Karim, A. M., Othman, R., Mohin, M., & Abdull Rahman, S. A. (2013). Student-Centered Learning (SCL) in the Malaysian Higher Education Institutions. Asian Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 5(2), 14-33. MOHE. (2014). e-Learning Guidelines for Malaysian HEIs. http://doi.org/lO.1017lCB09781107415324.004 MOHE, M. of H. E. of M. (2011). Pelan tindakanpengajian tinggi negara fasa 2 (2011- 2015) mencetus transformasipengajian tinggi (Vol. 2). Kuala Lumpur. Moore, M. G. (1989). Editorial: Three Types of Interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-7. http://doi.org/l0.1080108923648909526659 Morris, J. (201 6). The use of team-based learning in a second year undergraduate preregistration nursing course on evidence-informed decision making. Nurse Education in Practice, 21,23-28. http://doi.org/l0.1016/j.nepr.2016.09.005 Noesgaard, S. S., & (amgreen, R. (2015). The effectiveness of e-learning: An explorative and integrative review of the definitions, methodologies and factors that promote e-Learning effectiveness. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 13(4), 278-290. Nural Azhan, M. H., & Mohd Saman, M. Y. (2014). Enhancing Student Interaction and Engagement in Blended Learning. In Blended & Flipped Learning: Case Studies in Malaysian Higher Education Institutions (pp. 165-175). 07Boyle, I. (2014). Mobilising social media in sport management education. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 15, 58-60. http://doi.org/lO.1016/j.jhlste.2014.05.002 07Flaherty, J. A., & Laws, T. A. (2014). Nursing student's evaluation of a virtual classroom experience in support of their learning bioscience. Nurse Education in Practice, 14(6), 654-659. http://doi.org/lO.1016/j.nepr.2014. 07.004 07Flaherty, J. A., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85-95. http://doi.org/l0.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002 Overbaugh, R. C., & Nickel, C. E. (2011). A comparison of student satisfaction and value of academic community between blended and online sections of a university-level educational foundations course. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(3), 164-174. http://doi.org/l0.l016/j.iheduc.2010.12.001 Pallant, J. (201 0). SPSS: Survival Manual. Training (Fourth). Open University Press. Par, G. (2004). Investigating Information Systems With Positivist Case Study Research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 13, 233-264. personal communication. (2016). personal communication. Peterson, R. A. (1994). A Meta-Analysis of Cronbach ETMs C oefficient Alpha. Oxford University Press, 21 (2), 381-391. Rahim, H. L., Bahari, M. A., Zainal Abidin, Z., Junid, J., Mohd Kamaruddin, L., Mohd Lajin, N. F., . . . Bakri, A. A. (2015). Entrepreneurship Education in Malaysia : a Critical Review. Technology Management and Business, 2(2), 1-11. Rahim, H. L., & Chik, Ra. (2014). Graduate Entrepreneurs Creation: A Case of Universiti Technologi MARA, Malaysia. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 8(13), 15-20. Raihanah, M. M. (2014). Flipped Classroom & Meaning Learning among UKM Graduate Students: A Teacher Reflection. In Blended & Flipped Learning: Case Studies in Malaysian Higher Education Institutions (pp. 277-296). Ramayah, T. (2014). SmartPLS 2.0. Universiti Sains Malaysia. Ramayah, T., Wai, J., & Lee, C. (2012). System Characteristics, Satisfaction, and Elearning Usage: A Structural Equation Model (SEM). The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11 (2), 26-28. Razali, Z. B., & Kamarudin, L. M. (2014). Experience on Blended Learning: Toward e-Labotarory. In Blended & Flipped Learning: Case Studies in Malaysian Higher Education Institutions (pp. 147-161). Renner, D., Laumer, S., & Weitzel, T. (2014). Effectiveness and Efficiency of Blended Learning - A Literature Review. In Americas Conference on Information Systems, Savannah, 2014 (pp. 1-13). Rennie, L. J. (1982). Detecting a Response Set to Likert-style Attitude Items with the Rating Model. Education Research and Perspectives, 9(1), 114-118. Retrieved from http://www.rasch.org/erp9.htm/gifs/erp9. htm Ronald, B. M., Stanley, D. S., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2005). A Structural Equation Model of Predictors for Effective Online Learning. Journal of Management Education, 29(4), 53 1-563. Ronet, B., & Schutt, R. K. (2006). Chapter 5: Causation and Research Design. In The Practice ofResearch in Criminology and Criminal Justice (pp. 141-169). Rubin, B., Fernandes, R., & Avgerinou, M. D. (201 3). The effects of technology on the Community of Inquiry and satisfaction with online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 17, 48-57. http://doi.org/l0.1016lj.iheduc.2012.09.006 Salam, S., Bakar, N., Mohd Asarani, H., & Mohamed Saki, S. N. F. (2014). Designing an Interactive Book for Flipped Learning. In Blended & Flipped Learning: Case Studies in Malaysian Higher Education Institutions (pp. 299-308). Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Smith, D., Reams, R., & Hair, J. F. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): A useful tool for family business researchers. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(1), 105-115. http://doi.org/lO.101 6lj.jfbs.2014.01.002 Seiring, G. (2011). Why the "I"? Innovation in CITL. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2005). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 100(470), 708-708. http://doi.org/l0.1198/jasa.2005.~22 Shelton, K. (2010). A Quality Scorecard for the Administration of Online Education Programs: A Delphi Study. University of Nebraska. Shibley, I. (2014). Putting the Learning in Blended Learning. In Blended and Flipped : Exploring New Models for Effective Teaching & Learning (pp. 4-5). A Magna Publication. Siering, G. (2012). Disruptive Innovation in Teaching and Learning. Smith, M. K., Wood, W. B., Adams, W. K., Wieman, C., Knight, J. K., Guild, N., & Su, T. T. (2009). Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions. Science, 323(5910), 122-124. http://doi.org/lO.1126lscience.1165919 So, H.-J., & Brush, T. a. (2008). Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors. Computers & Education, 51(1), 318-336. http://doi.org/lO.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.009 Sullivan, G. M., & Feinn, R. (2012). Using Effect Size - or Why the P Value Is Not Enough. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 4(3), 279-82. http://doi.org/l0.4300/JGME-D-12-00156.1 Sultan, P., & Wong, H. (2013). Antecedents and consequences of service quality in a higher education context: a qualitative research approach. Quality Assurance in Education, 21(1), 70-95. http://doi.org/lO.1108109684881311293070 Sun, P., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-Learning ? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50, 1183-1202. http://doi.org/l0.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007 Teo, T. (2010). Development and validation of the E-learning Acceptance Measure (ElAM). The Internet and Higher Education, 13(3), 148-152. http://doi.org/l0.l016/j.iheduc.2010.02.001 The Current. (2016). Transcript for "Disruptive Innovation" theory often misunderstood, says creator Clayton Christensen. Triantafyllou, E., & Timcenko, 0 . (2014). Introducing a flipped classroom for a statistics course: A case study. In 2014 25th EAEEIE Annual Conference (EAEEIE) (pp. 5-8). Ieee. http://doi.org/l0.1109/EAEEIE.2014.6879373 Trowler, V. (2010). Student engagement literature review. Retrieved from http://www.heacademy.ac.uWassets/documents/ studentengagement/StudentEngagernentLiterature Review.pdf Tsai, C.-W., Shen, P.-D., & Tsai, M.-C. (2011). Developing an appropriate design of blended learning with web-enabled self-regulated learning to enhance students' learning and thoughts regarding online learning. Behaviour & Information Technology, 30(2), 261-271. http://doi.org/lO.1080/0144929X.2010.514359 Tullis, T., & Albert, B. (2012). Measuring the User Experience. UOREGON. (2016). The Flipped Classroom : Trends in Higher Education. Van Teijlingen, E., & Hundley, V. (2001). The importance of pilot studies. Social Research Update, (35). Vanderstraeten, R. (2003). An Observation of Luhmann's Observation of Education. European Journal of Social Theory, 6(1), 133-143. http://doi.org/lO.117711368431003006001420 Vanderstraeten, R. (2004). The Social Differentiation of the Educational System. Sociology, 38(2), 255-272. http://doi.org/lO.1177/0038038504040863 Wah, L. K., Ing, N. S., Keaong, T. C., & Jhee, Y. S. (2014). To Flip or IVot to Flip? Finding from a Malaysian Undergraduate Course in UMS. Ln Blended & Flipped Learning: Case Studies in Malaysian Higher Education Institutions (pp. 227-250). Wah, L. K., Keong, T. C., Ing, N. S., Jhee, Y. S., & Lajium, D. A. L. (2014). A Qualitative Study of In-service Teacher's Blended Learning Experiences via Schoology. In Blended & Flipped Learning: Case Studies in Malaysian Higher Education Institutions (pp. 83-102). Wang, A. I. (2015). The wear out effect of a game-based student response system. Computers and Education, 82, 217-227. http:Ndoi.org/l0.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.004 Wanner, T., & Palmer, E. (201 5). Personalising learning: Exploring student and teacher perceptions about flexible learning and assessment in a flipped university course. Computers and Education, 88, 354-369. http://doi.org/lO.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.008 Waters, J. K. (2015). Disrupting Higher Education. Wong, K. K.-K. (2013). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLSSEM) Techniques Using SmartPLS. Marketing Bulletin, 24(0ctober), 1-32. Retrieved from http://marketing-bulletin.massey.ac.nz/v24/ mb~v24~tl~wong.pdf Wong, K. K.-K. (2016). Mediation analysis, categorical moderation analysis, and higher-order constructs modeling in Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM): A B2B Example using Smart ... The Marketing Bulletin, 26, 1-22. http://doi.org/l0.13140/RG.2.1.1643.0562 Wu, J.-H., Tennyson, R. D., & Hsia, T.-L. (2010). A study of student satisfaction in a bIended e-Iearning system environment. Computers & Education, 55(1), 155-164. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.012 Yu, D., & Hang, C. C. (2008). A Reflective Review of Disruptive Innovation Theory. In PICMET (pp. 402414). http://doi.org/lO.1111lj.1468-2370.2009.00272.x Yusoff, M., McLeay, F., & Woodruffe-Buron, H. (201 5). Dimensions driving business student satisfaction in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 23(1), 86-104. Yusoff, M. N. H., Zainol, F. A., & Ibrahim, M. D. (2014). Entrepreneurship Education in Malaysia's Public Institutions of Higher Learning-A Review of the Current Practices. International Education Studies, 8(1) 717-28. http://doi.org/l0.5539/ies.v8nlpl7 Zainuddin, A., Kamaluddin, N., & Hassan, Z. (2012). Exploring Malay Student's Commitment in Online Learning - A Case of Business Management Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 67movember 2011), 81-92. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.309 Zainuddin, Z., Halili, S. H., Aceh, B., & Lumpur, K. (2016). Flipped Classroom Research and Trends from Different Fields of Study. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3), 313-340..

Student engagement, student interactions and 'quality of use' in blended learning using flipped classroom

Similar Items