Kesan tadbir urus korporat, tanggungjawab sosial korporat dan modal intelek ke atas prestasi syarikat tersenarai di Malaysia

Kesan tadbir urus korporat, tanggungjawab sosial korporat dan modal intelek ke atas prestasi syarikat tersenarai di Malaysia

Tanggungjawab sosial korporat dan tadbir urus korporat adalah penting di dalam meningkatkan ketelusan, akauntabiliti dan integriti perniagaan. Modal intelek pula penting sebagai salah satu punca kekayaan ekonomi sesebuah syarikat. Oleh itu ia perlu diberi perhatian yang serius apabila merangka strat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Abd Razak, Minhat
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
eng
Published: 2016
Subjects:
HD2709-2930.7 Corporations
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/6769/1/depositpermission_s93509.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/6769/2/s93509_01.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/6769/3/s93509_02.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.6769
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
eng
advisor Fadzil, Faudziah
Syed Ismail, Syed Soffian
topic HD2709-2930.7 Corporations
spellingShingle HD2709-2930.7 Corporations
Abd Razak, Minhat
Kesan tadbir urus korporat, tanggungjawab sosial korporat dan modal intelek ke atas prestasi syarikat tersenarai di Malaysia
description Tanggungjawab sosial korporat dan tadbir urus korporat adalah penting di dalam meningkatkan ketelusan, akauntabiliti dan integriti perniagaan. Modal intelek pula penting sebagai salah satu punca kekayaan ekonomi sesebuah syarikat. Oleh itu ia perlu diberi perhatian yang serius apabila merangka strategi syarikat. Tadbir urus korporat, tanggungjawab sosial korporat dan modal intelek dianggap sebagai sebahagian daripada strategi pengurusan untuk meningkatkan prestasi dan nilai syarikat. Kajian ini dijalankan bagi mengkaji kesan tadbir urus korporat, tanggungjawab sosial korporat dan modal intelek terhadap prestasi syarikat tersenarai di Bursa Malaysia. Prestasi syarikat diukur berdasarkan kepada pulangan atas aset dan pulangan atas ekuiti. Kajian kuantitatif ini mengggunakan data sekundar sebagai alat kajian. Data diperolehi daripada Laporan Tahunan Syarikat terpilih bagi tahun 2014. Sebanyak 140 syarikat tersenarai di Bursa Malaysia telah dipilih untuk dikaji. Syarikat dipilih berdasarkan sektor perniagaan. Hanya syarikat perlombongan dan pelaburan harta tanah dikecualikan. Data yang diperolehi dianalisis menggunakan analisis deskriptif dan inferensi, seperti analisis korelasi pearson dan ujian regressi berganda. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan nisbah pengarah bebas dan dualiti menyumbang secara signifikan kepada ROA dan ROE. Modal intelek turut memberi kesan signfikan kepada ROA dan ROE. Akhir sekali, kajian mendapati bahawa tadbir urus korporat, tanggungjawab sosial korporat dan modal intelek menerangkan sehingga 20 peratus kepada ROA dan 69 peratus kepada ROE. Dapatan kajian turut menyokong Teori Agensi dan Teori Berasaskan Sumber yang penting dalam penyelidikan prestasi syarikat. Dari segi praktikal, kajian ini menunjukkan kepentingan Pengarah Bebas dalam Lembaga Pengarah. Selain daripada itu, kajian turut mencadangkan syarikat untuk mendedahkan tanggungjawab sosial korporat yang boleh meningkatkan imej dan prestasi syarikat. Akhir sekali, kajian ini turut memberi implikasi yang penting kepada akademik
format Thesis
qualification_name Doctor of Business Administration (DBA)
qualification_level Doctorate
author Abd Razak, Minhat
author_facet Abd Razak, Minhat
author_sort Abd Razak, Minhat
title Kesan tadbir urus korporat, tanggungjawab sosial korporat dan modal intelek ke atas prestasi syarikat tersenarai di Malaysia
title_short Kesan tadbir urus korporat, tanggungjawab sosial korporat dan modal intelek ke atas prestasi syarikat tersenarai di Malaysia
title_full Kesan tadbir urus korporat, tanggungjawab sosial korporat dan modal intelek ke atas prestasi syarikat tersenarai di Malaysia
title_fullStr Kesan tadbir urus korporat, tanggungjawab sosial korporat dan modal intelek ke atas prestasi syarikat tersenarai di Malaysia
title_full_unstemmed Kesan tadbir urus korporat, tanggungjawab sosial korporat dan modal intelek ke atas prestasi syarikat tersenarai di Malaysia
title_sort kesan tadbir urus korporat, tanggungjawab sosial korporat dan modal intelek ke atas prestasi syarikat tersenarai di malaysia
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business
publishDate 2016
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/6769/1/depositpermission_s93509.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/6769/2/s93509_01.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/6769/3/s93509_02.pdf
_version_ 1747828114565627904
spelling my-uum-etd.67692018-05-28T07:42:07Z Kesan tadbir urus korporat, tanggungjawab sosial korporat dan modal intelek ke atas prestasi syarikat tersenarai di Malaysia 2016 Abd Razak, Minhat Fadzil, Faudziah Syed Ismail, Syed Soffian Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business HD2709-2930.7 Corporations Tanggungjawab sosial korporat dan tadbir urus korporat adalah penting di dalam meningkatkan ketelusan, akauntabiliti dan integriti perniagaan. Modal intelek pula penting sebagai salah satu punca kekayaan ekonomi sesebuah syarikat. Oleh itu ia perlu diberi perhatian yang serius apabila merangka strategi syarikat. Tadbir urus korporat, tanggungjawab sosial korporat dan modal intelek dianggap sebagai sebahagian daripada strategi pengurusan untuk meningkatkan prestasi dan nilai syarikat. Kajian ini dijalankan bagi mengkaji kesan tadbir urus korporat, tanggungjawab sosial korporat dan modal intelek terhadap prestasi syarikat tersenarai di Bursa Malaysia. Prestasi syarikat diukur berdasarkan kepada pulangan atas aset dan pulangan atas ekuiti. Kajian kuantitatif ini mengggunakan data sekundar sebagai alat kajian. Data diperolehi daripada Laporan Tahunan Syarikat terpilih bagi tahun 2014. Sebanyak 140 syarikat tersenarai di Bursa Malaysia telah dipilih untuk dikaji. Syarikat dipilih berdasarkan sektor perniagaan. Hanya syarikat perlombongan dan pelaburan harta tanah dikecualikan. Data yang diperolehi dianalisis menggunakan analisis deskriptif dan inferensi, seperti analisis korelasi pearson dan ujian regressi berganda. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan nisbah pengarah bebas dan dualiti menyumbang secara signifikan kepada ROA dan ROE. Modal intelek turut memberi kesan signfikan kepada ROA dan ROE. Akhir sekali, kajian mendapati bahawa tadbir urus korporat, tanggungjawab sosial korporat dan modal intelek menerangkan sehingga 20 peratus kepada ROA dan 69 peratus kepada ROE. Dapatan kajian turut menyokong Teori Agensi dan Teori Berasaskan Sumber yang penting dalam penyelidikan prestasi syarikat. Dari segi praktikal, kajian ini menunjukkan kepentingan Pengarah Bebas dalam Lembaga Pengarah. Selain daripada itu, kajian turut mencadangkan syarikat untuk mendedahkan tanggungjawab sosial korporat yang boleh meningkatkan imej dan prestasi syarikat. Akhir sekali, kajian ini turut memberi implikasi yang penting kepada akademik 2016 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/6769/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/6769/1/depositpermission_s93509.pdf text eng staffonly https://etd.uum.edu.my/6769/2/s93509_01.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/6769/3/s93509_02.pdf text eng public dba dba Universiti Utara Malaysia Abbott, L.J., Park, Y. & Parker, S. (2000). The effects of audit committee activity and independence on corporate fraud, Managerial Finance, 26(11), 55 – 68. Abdelsalam, O. & El-Masry, A. (2008). The Impact of Board Independence and Ownership Structure on the Timeliness of Corporate Internet Reporting of Irish- listed Companies, Managerial Finance, Vol. 34, No. 12, 907-918. Abdul Hamid, F. Z. (2004). Corporate Social Disclosure by Banks and Finance Companies. Corporate Ownership & Control, 1(4), 118-130. Abdul Rahman, R. & Mohamed Ali, F.H. (2006). Board, audit committee, culture and earnings management: Malaysian evidence. Managerial Auditing Journal. 21(7), 783-804. Abdullah, S.N. (2004). Board Composition, CEO Dualiti and Performance among Malaysian Listed Companies. Corporate Governance, 4(4), 47-61. Abidin, Z. Z., Kamal, N. M., & Jusoff, K. (2009). Board Structure and Corporate Performance in Malaysia. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 1(1). 150-164. Abu-Jarad, I.Y., Yusof, N. & Nikbin, D. (2010). A Review Paper on Organizational Culture and Organizational Performance. International Journal of Business and Social Science, December,1(3). Accountant Today (2006). Accountant Today, March. Adam, R. & Mehran, H. (2003). Is Corporate Governance Different for Bank Holding Companies?, Economic Policy Review, April, 123- 142. Adams, C.A., Hill, W.-Y. &Roberts, C.B. (1998). Corporate social reporting practices in Western Europe: legitimating corporate behavior, British Accounting Review, 30, 1-21. Adams, M.B. (1994). Agency Theory and the Internal Audit. Managerial Auditing Journal, 9(8). 8-12. Adebayo, E. (2000). Corporate social responsibility disclosure, corporate financial and social performance: an empirical analysis, DBA, Wayne Huizenga Graduate School of Business and Entrepreneurship, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL. Afrifa, G. A. dan Tauringana, V (2015). Corporate governance and performance of UK listed small and medium enterprises, Corporate Governance,15(5), 719 – 733. A-Kadir, A. (2002). Can Corporate Governance lead the way to global competitiveness? Chairman of Securities Commission. Speech text available: http://atsc/Knowledge/Knowledge%20Repository/Forms/Corporate%20Governanc e.aspx Al-Tuwaijri, S.A., Christensen, T.E. & Hughes, K.E. II (2004). The relations among environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and economic performance: a simultaneous equations approach, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29 447-71. Alves, C. & Mendes, V. (2004). Corporate Governance Policy & Company Performance: The Portugese Case. Onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/.1467- 8683.2004.00370.x/full. Amran, A. & Devi, S. (2008). The impact of government & foreign affiliate influence on corporate social responsibility: The case of Malaysia. www.emerald insight.com/com/doi/pdf/10.1108/02686900810864327 Appiah-Adu, K. & Singh, S. (1998). Customer orientation and performance: a study of SMEs, Management Decision, 36, 385-94. Aras, G. & Crowther, D. (2008). Governance and sustainability: An investigation into the relationship between corporate governance and corporate sustainability, Management Decision, 46(3), 433 – 448. Arora, A. dan Sharma, C. (2016). Corporate governance and firm performance in developing countries: evidence from India, Corporate Governance, 16 (12), 420 – 436. Arshad R. & Razak, S.N.Z. (2011). Corporate Social Responsibility disclosure & interaction effects of ownership structure on firm performance. Business, Engineering & Industrial Applications (ISBEIA), December. Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (ACCA) (2002). The State of Corporate Environmental Reporting in Malaysia, London: Certified Accountants Educational Trust. Bai, C., Liu, Q., Lu, J., Song, F.M. & Zhang, J. (2004). Corporate governance and market valuation in China, Journal of Comparative Economics, 32, 599-616. Barney, J.B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. Beasley, M.S. (1996). An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. The Accounting Review. 71(4). 443- 465. Bendickson, J., Muldoon, J. , Liguori, E., Phillip E. dan Davis, P. E.(2016). Agency theory: the times, they are a-changin, Management Decision, 54 (1), 174 – 193. Bevan, S., Isles, N., Emery, P. & Hoskins, T. (2004). Achieving high performance: CSR at the heart of business, available at: www.theworkfoundation.com/pdf/184373017.pdf. Black B. S., Jang H., Kim W. & Mark J. (2002). Does corporate governance affect firm value? Evidence from Korea. Working Paper, Stanford Law School. Blue Ribbon Committee (1999). Report and Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Committee on Improving the Effectiveness of Corporate Audit Committees, New York Stock Exchange, New York, NY, Bonn, I. & Fisher, J. (2005). Corporate Governance and Business Ethics: Insights from the Strategic Planning Experience. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 730-738. Bontis, N., Crossan, M. & Hulland, J. (2001). Managing an organizational learning system by aligning stocks and flows. Journal of Management Studies, 39(4), 437- 469 Bontis, N., Fitz-enz, J. (2002). Intellectual capital ROI: a causal map of human capital antecedents and consequents, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 3(3), 223-47. Bontis, N., Keow, W. C. C. & Richardson, S. (2000). Intellectual capital and business performance in Malaysian industries. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1, 85-100. Bozbura, F. (2004). Measurement and application of intellectual capital in Turkey,The Learning Organization, 357-367. Brickley, J.A., Coles, J.L. & Jarrell, G. (1997). Leadership structure: separating the CEO and chairman of the board, Journal of Corporate Finance, 3, 189-220. Brigham, E. F. & Houston, J. F. (2004). Fundamentals of Financial Management (10th ed.). Mason, OH: Thompson South-Western. Brown, L. D. & Caylor, M. L., (2004). The Correlation Between Corporate Governance and Company Performance, Institutional Shareholder Services, USA. Bryson, J.R., Daniels, P.W. & Ingram, D.R. (1999). Evaluating the impact of business link on the performance and profitability of SMEs in the United Kingdom, Policy Studies, 20(2), 95-105. Bučiūnienė , I dan Kazlauskaitė, R. (2012). The linkage between HRM, CSR and performance outcomes, Baltic Journal of Management, 7(1), 5 – 24. Bursa Malaysia, (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Framework for Malaysia available at http://www.bursamalaysia.com/website/bm/about_us/the_organisation/csr/ Cabrita, M.R. & Bontis, N. (2008). Intellectual capital and business performance in the Portugese Banking Industry, International Journal of Technology Management, 43(1-3). Carcello, J.V., Hermanson, D.R., Neal, T.L. & Riley Jr., R. A., (2002). Board Characteristics and Audit Fees, Contemporary Accounting Research, 19(3), 365- 384. Castka, P., Bamber, C. J. & Sharp J. M. (2004). Benchmarking intangible assets: enhancing teamwork performance using self-assessmentdan, Benchmarking: An International Journal, 11(6), 571-83 Carpenter, M.A. & Westphel, J.D. (2001). The strategic context of external network ties: Examining the impact of director appointments on board involvement in strategic decision making. The Academy of Management Journal. 44(4), 639-660. Chan, F., Qi, H. J., Chan, H. K., Lau, H. & Ip, R. (2003). A conceptual model of performance measurement for supply chains. Management Decision, 41(7), 635- 642. Chan, K.C. & Li., J. (2008). Audit Committee and Firm Value: Evidence on Outside Top Executives as Expert-Independent Directors, Corporate Governance, 16(1), 16-31. Chang & Shin (2007). A strategic fit perspective on family firm performance, Springler Gabler, US. Chang, A., Chang, A.A.L & Mansor, S. (2005). Can good corporate governance practices contribute to firm‟s financial performance? Evidence from Malaysian Companies. International Journal of Business Governance & Ethics, 4. Chapple, W. & Moon, J. (2005)., Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Asia: A Seven Country Study of CSR Website Reporting, Business and Society, 44(4), 415-441. Che Zuriana, M.J., Kasumalinda, A. & Rapiah, M. (2003). Corporate social responsibility disclosure in the annual reports of Malaysian companies: a longitudinal study, Social & Environmental Accounting Journal, 22(2), 5-9. Chen W.C., Lin J.B. & Yi, B. (2008). CEO dualiti and firm performance – an endogenous issue. Corporate Ownership and Control. 6(1). Chen, C.J.P. & Jaggi, B. (2000). Association Between Independent Non-executive Directors, Family Control and Financial Disclosures in Hong Kong, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 19, 285-310. Chen, M.-C., S.-J. Cheng & Y. Hwang. (2005). An empirical investigation of the relationship between intellectual capital and firmsdan market value and financial performance. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 6(2). 159-176. Chen, Z., Cheung, Y.L., Stouraitis, A. & Wong, A.W.S. (2005). Ownership concentration, firm performance and dividend policy in Hong Kong, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 13, 431-49. Choi, J.J, Park, S.W & Yoo, S.S., (2007). The Value of Outside Directors: Evidence from Corporate Governance Reform in Korea, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 42(4), 941-962. Choo, C.W. & Bontis, N. (2002). Managing organizational knowledge by diagnosing intellectual capital: framing and advancing the state of the field. In The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge (Choo CW and Bontis N, Eds). 621–642, Oxford University Press, Oxford. Chouchene, I. (2010). The Determinants of the Presence of Independent Directors in French Board Companies. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(5). Choudhury, G. (2010). The role of diginal libraries in a time of global change. 12th International Conference on Asia-Pacific Digital Libraries, ICADL 2010, Goal Coast Australia. CIMA (2003). Understanding Corporate Value: Managing and Reporting Intellectual Capital, CIMA: London. Coleman, A.K. & Bickpe, N. (2006). The link between corporate governance and performance of the non-traditional export sektor. Evidence from Ghana. www. Emeraldsight.com/doi/pdf/10.1108/147207006.10706090. Coles, J.W., McWilliams, V.B. & Sen, N. (2001). An Examination of the Relationship of Governance Mechanisms to Performance. Journal of Management, 27(1), 23- 50. Confederation of British Industry (2001). CBI response to the European Commission green paper on: promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility, available at: www.europa.eu.int/comm/employment_social/soc- dial/csr/cbi_uk_en011219.htm, . Connelly, J.T & Limpaphayon, P. (2004). Board Characteristics and Firm Performance: Evidence from the Life Insurance Industry in Thailand, Chulalongkorn Journal of Economics, 16(2), 101-124. Cooper, D.R. & Schindler, P.S. (2003). Business Research Method. Industrial Management, McGraw-Hill/Irwin Cullen, K. dan Parker, D. W. (2015). Improving performance in project-based management: synthesizing strategic theories, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 64(5), 608 – 624. Dahya, J. & McConnell, J.J. (2003). Board composition, corporate performance and the Cadbury Committee Recommendation. Purdue CIBER Working Papers, Paper 21. http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cibernip/21. Daily, C.M. & Dalton, D.R. (1994). Bankruptcy and corporate governance: The impact of board composition and structure. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1603- 1617. Darwin, Ali. (2006). Akuntabilitas, Kebutuhan, Pelaporan dan Pengungkapan CSR bagi Perusahaan di Indonesia. Economics Business Accounting Review, 3, 83-95. Davis, M.S. (1971). That‟s interesting!: Towards a phemomenology of sociology & a sociology of phenomenology. Philosophy of the social science, 1, 209 Dawar, V. (2014). Agency theory, capital structure and firm performance: some Indian evidence, Managerial Finance, 40(12), 1190 – 1206. Deegan, C. (2006). Financial Accounting Theory. Sydney: McGraw-Hill Irwin. Dehaene, A., Vuyst, V.D. & Ooghe, H. (2001). Corporate performance and board structure in Belgian companies, Long Range Planning, 34, 383-98. Denis, D.K. & McConnell, J.J. (2003). International corporate governance. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38, 1-36. Donaldson, T. & Preston, L. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications, Academy of Management Review,, 20(1), 65- 91. Duffy, J. (2000). Measuring customer capital, Strategy & Leadership, 28(5),10-14. Ehikioya, B. (2009). Corporate Governance Structure and Firm Performance in Developing Economies: Evidence from Nigeria. Corporate Governance, 9(3), 231-243. Epps, R.W. & Cereola, S.J. (2008). Do institutional shareholder services (IIS) corporate governance rating reflect a company‟s operating performance. Critical Perspective on Accounting, 19, 1135-1148. Fama, E. & Jensen, M., (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics. 26(2), 301-325. Firer, S. & Williams, S. M. (2003). Intellectual Capital and Traditional Measures of Corporate Performance, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4(3), 348-360. Frankental, P. (2001). Corporate social responsibility – a PR invention! www.emeraldsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/13563280110381170 Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman Publishing. Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Gan, K. & Saleh, Z. (2008). Intellectual capital and corporate performance of technology-intensive companies: Malaysia evidence, Asian Journal of Business and Accounting, 1(1), 113-30. Ghazali, N.A.M. (2010). Ownership structure, corporate governance and corporate performance in Malaysia, International Journal of Commerce and Management, 20 (2), 109 – 119. Goh, P.C. (2005). Intellectual Capital performance of commercial banks in Malaysia, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 6(3), 385-396. Gou, Q. & Wang, N. (2016). Supply chain contracting the linear utility function. International Journal of information system & Supply Chain Management. Gray, R., Javad, M., Power, D. & Sinclair, D. (2001). Social and environmental disclosure and corporate characteristics: a research note and extension, Journal of Business and Accounting, 28(3/4), 327-56. Gray, R., Owen, D.L. & Mounders, K. (1987). Corporate Social Reporting: Accounting and Accountability, Prentice Hall International, London. Grinyer, A. (1995). The anonymity of research participants: Assumption, ethics & practicalities department of sociology, Universities of Surrey, U.K., spring. Guijarro, A., Auken, H. V. & Garcia, D. (2007). An analysis of faktors impacting performance of Spanish manufacturing firms. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 20(4), 369-386. Gul, F. & Leong, S. (2004). Board leadership, outside director directors expertise and voluntary corporate disclosures, Journal of Accounting & Public Policy, 2(3), 351- 379. Guan Yeik, T. (2006). The relationship between board of directors & corporate social responsibilities: study on Malaysian public listed companies’, Master‟s in Accounting, USM, Penang. Guthrie J., Yongvanich K. & Ricceri F. (2006) Using content analysis as a research method to inquire into intellectual capital reporting. Journal of Intellectual Capital 5, 282–293. Haat, M.H.C., Rahman, R.A. & Mahenthiran, S. (2008). Corporate governance, transparency and performance of Malaysian companies, Managerial Auditing Journal, 23(8), 744 – 778. Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E. & Tatham, R.L. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. New Jersey: Pearson Education International. Halliman, R.W. (1998). A coming of age:A comparison of organizational perfornace of baby boom CEOs to CEOs born prior to the baby boom era. Journal of Management History, 4(1), 618-74. Hall, R. (1992). The Strategic analysis of intangible resources, Strategic Management Journal, 13(2). Hamzah, N. & Ismail, M.N. (2008). The Importance of Intellectual Capital Management in the. Knowledge-based Economy. Contemporary Management Research Pages 4, (3), 237-262, Hashim, H.A. & S.Susela Devi. (2008). Board Independence, CEO Dualiti and Accrual Management: Malaysian Evidence, Asian Journal of Business and Accounting, 1(1). Hermalin, B. E. (2005). Trends in Corporate Governance. The Journal of Finance, 60, 2351–2384. Higgs, D. (2003). Review of the Role and Effectiveness of Non-executive Directors, The Department of Trade and Industry, London. Hooley, G., Cox, T., Fahy, J., Shipley, D., Beracs, J., Fonfara, K. & Snoj B., (2000). Market orientation in the transition economies of Central Europe: Tests of the Narver and Slater market orientation scales. Journal of Business Research, 50, 273-285. Hooley, G., Greenley, G., Fahy, J. & Cadogan, J. (2001).Market-focused Resources, Competitive Positioning and Firm Performance. Journal of Marketing Management. 17(5-6): 503- 520.http://www.mckinsey.com/clientservice/organizationleadership/service/corpgo vernance/pdf/globalinvestoropinionsurvey2002.pdf Hu, H. W. dan Alon, I. (2014), Are Chinese CEOs Stewards or Agents? Revisiting the Agency–Stewardship Debate, in Chinmay Pattnaik , Vikas Kumar (ed.) Emerging Market Firms in the Global Economy (International Finance Review, Volume 15) Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 255 – 277. Hvolby, H.-H. & Thorstenson, A. (2001). Indicators for performance measurements in small and medium-sized enterprises, Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 215 (B), 1143-6 Jaakkola M. (2006). Strategic Marketing and Its Effect on Business Performance: Moderating Effect of Country Specific Faktors, Retrieved March 12, 2010, from http:///www.statmark.fi/wpcontent/ upload/2006/11/Thesis_Jaakkola FINAL Jackling, B. & Johl, S. (2009). Board structure and firm performance: Evidence from India‟s top companies. Corporate Governance An International Review. Janggu, T., Joseph, C. & Madi, N. (2007). The Current State of Corporate Social Responsibility Among Industrial Companies in Malaysia, Social Responsibility Journal, 3(3), 9 – 18 Jelcic, K. (2007). Handbook of IC management in companies,dan -on.net, [Online], http://www.-on.net/start.htm Jensen M. & Meckling W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360. Jensen, M.C. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems,Journal of Finance, 48(3), 831-80. Jones, P., Comfort, D. & Hillier, D. (2007). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Case Study of the Top Ten Global Retailers, Euromed Journal of Business, 2(1), 23-35. Jones, T (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: a synthesis of ethics and economics, Academy of Management Review,, 20(2), 404-37. Joo, S.,Nixon, D. & Steoberl, P. (2011). Benchmarking with data envelopment analysis. A return on asset perspective. Benchmarking: An International ournal, 18(4), 529- 542. Judge, W.Q. & Zeithamal, C.P.l (1992). Institutional & Strategic choice perspective on Board involvement in the strategic decision process, The Academy of Management Journal, 35(4), 766-794. Juma, N. & Payne, G. T. (2004). Intellectual Capital and Performance of New Venture High-Tech Firms, International Journal of Innovation Management, 8(3), 297- 318. Kakabadse, A., Ward, K., Korac-Kakabadse, N. & Bowmen, C. (2001). Role and contribution of non-executive directors. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 1(1), 4-8. Kala, A. (2001). Corporate Governance: A Practical Approach. Singapore: Butterworth Asia. Kamath, G.B. (2007). The intellectual capital performance of the Indian Banking Sektor, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8(1), 96-123. Kelton, A. S. & Yang, Y., (2008). The Impact of Corporate Governance on Internet Financial Reporting, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 27, 62-87. Kent P. & Chan, C. (2003). Application of stakeholder theory to the quantity and quality of Australian voluntary corporate environmental disclosures. http//ssrn.com/ Knott, P. (2009). Integrating resource-based theory in a practice-relevant form. Journal of Strategy and Management, 2(2). Koh, P.S., Laplante, S.K. & Tong, Y.H. (2007). Accountability and Value Enhancement Roles of Corporate Governance, Accounting and Finance, 47, 305-333. Kok, P., Weile, T.V.D., McKenna, R. & Brown, A. (2001). A corporate social responsibility audit within a quality management framework, Journal of Business Ethics, 31(4), 285-97. Koufopoulos, D., Zoumbos, V. Argyropoulou, M. & Motwani, J. (2008). Top management team and corporate performance: A study of Greek firms. Team Performance management, An International Journal, 14(7/8), 340-363. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610. Kula, V. (2005). An analysis of the factors affecting the adoption of electronic commerce by SMEs: Evidence from an emerging market, International Marketing Review, 22, 623-640. Kumar, M. (2004). Getting close to the real. ICSSR Indian Psychological Abstracts & Reviews, 11(2), 1-25. Lashgari, M. (2004). Corporate governance: theory and practice. Journal of American Academy of Business, 5, 46-51. Lahouel, B. B., Peretti, J. M. dan Autissier, D. (2014). Stakeholder power and corporate social performance: the ownership effect, Corporate Governance, 14(3), 363 – 381. Lee, S.Y. & Song, X.Y. (2004). Evaluation of the Bayesian and maximum likelihood approaches in analyzing structural equation models with small sample sizes, Multivariate Behavioural Research, 39(4), 653-686. Lefort, F. & Urzua, F., (2008). Board Independence, Firm Performance and Ownership Concentration: Evidence from Chile, Journal of Business Research, 61, 615-622. Leng, ACA & Mansor, S.A. (2005). Can good corporate governance practices contribute to firm‟s financial performance? Evidence from Malayisan companies, International Journal of Business Governance & Ethics, 1(4), 350-362. Liew, N.W., Mariasi, D.N., Arnold S.G., Binger, R.L., Harmel, R.D., & Veith, T.L.(2007). Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations, American Society of Agricultural & Biological Engineer, 50(3), 885-900. Lin, T.J. & Chong, E. (2010). A comparative study of state immunity from jurisdiction, recognition & enforcement action. Lulu.com. Lind, P., Sepulveda, E. & Nunez, J. (2000). On the applicability of a computer model for business performance analysis in SMEs: a case study from Chile, Information Technology for Development, 9(1), 33-44 Liu, M.T., Wong, I. A., Shi, G., Chu, R. dan Brock, J. L. (2014). The impact of corporate social responsibility (CSR) performance and perceived brand quality on customer-based brand preference, Journal of Services Marketing, 28(3), 181 – 194. Loi, T. H. (2016), Stakeholder management: a case of its related capability and performance, Management Decision, 54(1), 148 – 173. Low, J. & Kalafut, P.C. (2002). Invisible Advantage - How Intangibles are Driving Business Performance, Perseus Publishing, Cambridge. Mackey, A., Mackey, T.B. & Barney, J.B. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: investor preferences and corporate strategies, Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 817-35. Maijoor, S. (2000). The internal control explosion, International Journal of Auditing, 4 (1), 101-9. Makki, M.M.A., Lodhi, S.A. & Rahman, R. (2008). Intellectual Capital Performance of Pakistani Listed Corporate Sektor . International Journal of Business and Management, 3(10), 45- 51. Malaysian Code on Corporate Governance (MCCG) (2011). Securities Commission of Malaysia. Manakkalathil, J., & Rudolf, E. (1995). Corporate social responsibility in a globalizing market, SAM Advanced Management Journal, 47, 29-32. Marnet, O. (2005). Behavior and rationality in corporate governance. Journal of Economics Issues, 39 (3), 613-622. Matos, J.A. n de (2001). MSM estimators of European options on assets with jumps, Mathemtical Finance, 11(2), 189-203. Matten, D., Crane, A. & Chapple, W. (2003). Behind the Mask: Revealing the True Face of Corporate Citizenship. Journal of Business Ethics, 45 (1/2), 109-120. Maury, B. (2006). Corporate governance & Top executives, Onlinelibraty.wiley.com/com/doi/10.1111/j.1354.7798.00317.x McDonald, M.L., Westphal, J.D. & Graebner, M.E., (2008). What Do They Know? The Effects of Outside Directors Acquisition Experience on Firm Acquisition Performance, Strategic Management Journal, 29, 1155-1177. McGuire, J.B., Sundgren, A. & Scheeweis, T. (1988). danCorporate social responsibility and firm financial performance.dan Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 854- 872. Menassa, C.C. (2010). Corporate social responsibility: An exploratory study of the quality and extent of social disclosures of Lebanese commercial banks, Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 11(1), 4-23. Mohamad, A.A. & Ibrahim M.K. (2002). Determinant of firm level governance: Malaysian corporate governance: The evidence. International Journal of Business & Society, 7(5). Mohamad, J. & Ahmad, Z. (2001).Determinants of environmental reporting in Malaysia, a positive accounting approach. Multimedia University, Malaysia. Mohamed Zain, M.M. & Janggu, T. (2006). Corporate social disclosure of contruction companies in Malaysia, Malaysian Accounting Review, 5(1). Mohd Ghazali, N.A. (2007). Ownership structure and corporate social responsibility disclosure: some Malaysian evidence, Corporate Governance Journal, 7(3), 251- 66. Mohd Nor, M.N. (2010). Financial restatements in corporate governance among Malaysia listed companies. Managerial Accounting, 29(6), 526-52. Montabon, F., Sroufe, R. & Narasimhan, R. (2007). An examination of corporate reporting, environmental management practices and firm performance, Journal of Operations Management, 45, 998-1014. Muhamed Zain, M.M. & Ismail, M.K.A. (2009). Intellectual capital efficiency and firms performance. International ournal of Economics & Finance, 1(2), 206-212. Mustapha, M. & Che Ahmad, A. (2011). Agency theory and managerial ownership: evidence from Malaysia, Managerial Auditing Journal, 26(5), 419 - 436 Najmi, M., Rigas, J. & Fan, I. (2005). A framework to review performance measurement systems. Business Process Management Journal, 11(2), 109-122. Najid, N.A. & Rahman, A.I. (2015). Government ownerhip and performance of Malaysian government-linked companies. International Research Journal, Journal of Finance & Economics, 61(11), 1450-2887. Nakamura, E. (2015). The bidirectional CSR investment – economic performance relationship, Journal of Global Responsibility, 6(1), 128 – 144. Nasir, N. (2003). Voluntary disclosure & corporate governance among financially distressed firms in Malaysia, Monash Universiti Malaysia. Nasir, N. & Abdullah, S. (2009). Voluntary Disclosure and Corporate Governance Among Financially Distressed Firms in Malaysia, Retrieved November 18th. 2009, from: http://www.business.curtin.edu.au/files/nasir-abdullah.pdf National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD)(2010). National Association of Corporate Directors, Washington, DC, Report of the NACD Blue Ribbon Commission on Audit Committee: A Practical Guide. Ngwakwe, C.C. (2009). Environmental responsibility and firm performance: evidence from Nigeria, International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 3, 97-104. Nicholson, G.J. & Kiel, G.C. (2004). A framework for diagnosing board effectiveness. Corporate Governance – An international Review, 12(4), 442-460. Nik Ahmad, N.Z. & Abdul Rahim, N. L. A. (2003). Awareness of the concepts of corporate social responsibility among Malaysian managers in selected public listed companies, paper presented at the 7th International Conference on Global Business and Economic Development, Plaza Athanee Hotel, Bangkok, January, 8- 11. Nik Ahmad, N.Z, Sulaiman, M. & Siswantora, D. (2003). Corporate social responsibility disclosure in Malaysia: An analysis of Reports of KLSE Listed companies, International Journal of Economics, Management and Accounting, 11(1), 1-37. Oppewal, H., Alexander, A. & Sullivan, P. (2006). Consumer perceptions of corporate social responsibility in town shopping centres and their influence on shopping evaluations, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 13, 261-74. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)(2004). OECD Principles of Corporate Governance: 2004. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F.L. & Rynes, S.L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: a meta-analysis, Organization Studies, 24, 403-41. Ow-Yong, K. & Guan, C.K. (2000). Corporate governance codes: A comparison between Malaysia and the UK. Conference Papers. 8(2), 125-132 Parker, C. (2000). Performance measurement. Work study, 49(2), 63-66. Pelham, A. M. & Wilson, D. T. (1996). A Longitudinal Study of the Impact of Market Structure, Firm Structure, Strategy, and Market Orientation Culture on Dimensions of Small-Firm Performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 24(1). 27. Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The corner-stones of competitive advantage: a resource-based view, Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179-91. Ponnu, C. H. (2008). Corporate Governance Structures and the Performance of Malaysian Public Listed Companies. International Review of Business Research Papers, 4(2), 217-230. Prathaban & Abdul Rahim, (2005). Big Earners, Small Givers, Malaysian Business, September, 12-16. Pulic, A. (1998). Measuring the performance of intellectual potential in knowledge economy. available at: http://www.vaic-on.net/start.htm Qu, W. & Leung, P. (2006). Cultural impact on Chinese corporate disclosure-a corporate governance perspective. Managerial Auditing Journal; 21(3), 241-264. Rahman, R.A. & Haniffa, R.M. (2005). The effect of role duality on corporate performance in Malaysia. Corporate ownership & control, 2(2), 40-47. Rahman, A., Ku Ismail, K.N. & Nordin, W.W.H. (2011). The influence of corporate governance and firms‟s characteristics o n the extent of compliance with MASB standards among Malaysian listed companies. International Journal of Business & Social Research, 1(1), 153-173. Randy, G. & Jensseen, P. (2004). Efficient corporate governance characteristics: an application to the shipping business. International Hellenic University, Thessaloniki. Ranjith, B. A. A. (2007). The Impact of Intellectual Capital on Investorsdan Capital Gain on Shares: An Empirical Investigation in Thai Banking, Finance and Insurance Sektor. J. Internet Bank. Com. Rechner, P.L. & Dalton, D.R. (1989). The impact of CEO as board chairperson on corporate performance. Evidence vs rhetoric. The Academy of Management Executive, 3(2), 141-143. Reddy, K., Locke, S. & Seringeour, F. (2010). The efficacy of principle-based corporate governance practices & firm financial performance: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Managerial Finances, 6(3), 190-219. Rezaee, Z. (2002). Financial Statement Fraud: Prevention and Detection, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY. Rhoades, D.L., Rechner, P.L. & Sundaramurthy, C. (2001). A meta-analysis of board leadership structure and financial performance: are dantwo heads better than onedan?, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 9(4), 311-19. Riahi-Belkaoui, A. (2003). Intellectual capital and firm performance of US multinational firms. A study of the resource-based and stakeholder views. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4, 215- 226. Ruf, B.M., Muralidhar K., Brown R.M., Janney J.J. & Paul, K. (2001). An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Change in Corporate Social Performance and Financial Performance: A Stakeholder Theory Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 32, 143-156 Runhui, L., Jianhong, F., Yang, Z.,Hongjuan, Z.dan Rujing, H. (2011). Research on the relationship among corporate governance environment, governance behavior and governance performance: Evidences from the evolution of Chinese telecommunication industry, Nankai Business Review International, 2(4), 358 – 382. Said, R., Zainuddin, Y. & Haron, H. (2009). The relationship between corporate social responsibility disclosure and corporate governance characteristics in Malaysian public listed companies, Social Responsibility Journal, 5(2), 212 – 226. Saenz, G. & Garcia-Meca, E.(2015). Does corporate governance influence earnings management in Latin American Markets? Journal of Business Ethics, 21, 419. Saleh, M., Zulkifli,N. & Muhamad, R. (2010). Corporate social responsibility disclosure and its relation on institutional ownership: Evidence from public listed companies in Malaysia, Managerial Auditing Journal, 25(6), 591 – 613. Sanda, A. Mikailu, A.S. & Garba, T. (2005). Corporate governance mechanisms & firm financial performance in Nigeria. AERC Research Paper, Nairobi, 149. Sarbanes, P. & Oxley, M. (2002). Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, US Congress, Washington, DC. Sato, Y. (2004). Corporate governance-Indonesia: A study on governance of business groups Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 88-136. Scherrer, P. S. (2003). Directorsdan Responsibilities and Participation in the Strategic Decision Making Process, Corporate Governance, 3(1), 86-90. Securities Commission (2010). Retrieved: 11th. February, 2010, from: http://www.sc.com.my/sub.asp?pageid=&menuid=229&newsid=&linkid=&type= downloads/csr_framework_slides.pdf. Shahin, A. & Zairi, M. (2007). Corporate governance as a critical element for driving excellence in corporate social responsibility, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 24(7), 753 – 770 Shaw, L. (2004). Overview of corporate governance issues for co-operative. Discussion Paper. The Co-operative College, Machester, UK. 1-35. Shiu, H. (2006). The application of the value added intellectual coefficient to measure corporate performance: evidence from technological firms, International Journal of Management, 23(2), 356-65. Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R.W. (2012). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737-783. Silva, A. S., Vitorino, A., Alves, C. F., Cunha, J. A. & Monteiro, M. A. (2006). Livro Branco sobre Corporate Governance em Portugal. Instituto Português de Corporate Governance. Siregar, S.V. & Bachtiar, Y. (2010). Corporate social reporting. Empirical evidence from Indonesia Stock Exchange, International Journal of Islamic & Middle Eastern Finance & Management, 3(30), 241-252. Siu, W.S. (2000). Marketing and company performance of Chinese small firms in mainland China: a preliminary study, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 7(2), 105-22. Siwar, C. & Hossain (2009). An analysis of Islamic CSR, concept and the opinion of Malaysian managements, Management of Environmental Auditing; An International Journal, 20(3), 290-298. Soloman, R. & Hansen, K. (1985). Itdans Good Business, Atheneum, New York, NY. Stewart, T.A. (1997). Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organizations, Doubleday/Currency, New York, NY. Striukova, L., Unerman, J. & Guthrie, J. (2008). Corporate reporting of intellectual capital: evidence from UK companies, The British Accounting Review, 40(4), 297- 313. Su, H. Y., Fang, S. C. & Young, C. S. (2011). Relationship transparency for partnership enhancement: an intellectual capital perspective, Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 26(6), 456 – 468. Subramaniam, M. & Youndt, M. (2005). The influence of intellectual capital on types of innovative capabilities, Academy of Management Journal,48(3), 450-63. Suta, I Putu Gede Ary. (2006). Kinerja Pasar Perusahaan Publik di Indonesia: Suatu Analisis Reputasi Perusahaan. Jakarta : Yayasan SAD Satria Bhakti. Tabachnick, G. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Experimental Designs using ANOVA. Duxbury, Belmont, CA. Tan, H. P., Plowman D. & Hancock, P. (2007). Intellectual capital and financial returns of companies. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8(1), 76-95. Thornton, G. (1997). The Expected Role of Audit Committee, Grant Thornton, New York, NY. Ting, Q.H. (2009). Literature reviews of institutional investor holding share influence on corporate governance, Journal of Xian University of Finance & Economic. Thompson, T. & Zakaria, M. (2004). CSR reporting in Malaysia: Progress and Prospects, Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 13, 125. Treadwell, D. (2006). The Role of the Non-Executive Director: A Personal View, Corporate Governance, 6(1), 64-68. Tuan, L. T. (2014). Corporate governance and brand performance, Management Research Review, 37(1), 45 – 68. Uadiale, O.M. (2010). The Impact of Board Structure on Corporate Financial Performance in Nigeria, International Journal of Business and Management, 5(10). Ugurlu, M. (2000). Agency costs and corporate control devices in the Turkish manufacturing industry, Journal of Economics Studies, 27(6), 566-99. Vilanova, M., Lozano, J. M. & Arenas, D. (2009). Exploring the nature of the relationship between CSR and competitiveness, Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 57-69. Wang, W. Y. & Chang, C. (2005). Intellectual Capital and Performance in Causal Models, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 6(2), 222-236. Warnier, V., Weppe, X. dan Lecocq, X. (2013). Extending resource-based theory: considering strategic, ordinary and junk resources, Management Decision, 51(7), 1359 – 1379. Watts, R.L. & Zimmerman, J.L. (1978). Towards a positive theory of the determinants of accounting standards, Accounting Review, 5(2), 112-384. Weil, Gotshal & Manges L. L. P (2002). Comparative Study of Corporate Governance Codes Relevant to the European Union and its Member States, On behalf of the European Commission, Final Report, Internal Market Directorate General, Brussels. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm, Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-80. Whetten, D. A., Rands, G. & Godfrey, P. C. (2001). What are the responsibilities of business to society? In A. Pettigrew, H. Thomas, & R. Whittington (Eds.). Handbook of strategy and management. pp.373–410. London: Sage. Whitehouse, L. (2003). Corporate social responsibility, corporate citizenship and the global compact, Global Social Policy, 3(3), 299-318. Xiao, J. Z, Yang, H. & Chow, C. W. (2004). The Determinants and Characteristics of Voluntary Internet-based Disclosures, by Listed Chinese Companies, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 23, 191-225. Xie, B., Davidsons, W. N. & DaDalt, P. J. (2001). Earnings Management and Corporate Governance: The Role of the Board and the Audit Committee, Retrieved February 3rd. 2010, from: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=304195. Xu, Y. & Qiu, A. (2012). A survey of corporate governance: internal trends & China made, Nankar Business Review International, 3(1), 4-30. Xu, D., Huo, B. dan Sun, L. (2014). Relationships between intra-organizational resources, supply chain integration and business performance : An extended resource-based view, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 114(8), 1186 – 1206. Yeh Y. H., Lee T. S. & Ko C. E. (2002). Corporate Governance and Rating System. Business Weekly Publisher: Taiwan. Young, S. (2000). The Increasing Use of Non-Executive Directors: Its Impact on UK Board Structure and Governance Arrangements, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 29(9 & 10), 1311 – 1342. Yuen, C.Y., Liu, M. Zhang, X. & Lu, C. (2009). A Case Study of Voluntary Disclosure by Chinese Enterprises. Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting. 1(2). Zeghal, D. & Ahmed, S.A. (1990). Comparison of social responsibility information disclosure media used by Canadian firms, Accounting , Auditing & Accountability Journal, 3(1).

Similar Items