Sekolah menengah atas berprestasi tinggi dan rendah di Kota Makassar, Indonesia

The examination results of the Education Department of South Sulawesi Province for secondary school in Makassar shows the differenere between schools in Makassar. Results show that the majority of schools are at an urisatisfactory level. However, there are some schools that achieve a high level of...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Bakkareng, Hasmirati
Format:	Thesis
Language:	eng eng eng
Published:	2018
Subjects:	LB1603 Secondary Education High schools
Online Access:	https://etd.uum.edu.my/6908/1/DepositPermission_s92743.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/6908/2/s92743_01.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/6908/3/s92743_02.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-uum-etd.6908
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection	UUM ETD
language	eng eng eng
advisor	Sin, Ishak Kasim, Abd Latif
topic	LB1603 Secondary Education High schools
spellingShingle	LB1603 Secondary Education High schools Bakkareng, Hasmirati Sekolah menengah atas berprestasi tinggi dan rendah di Kota Makassar, Indonesia
description	The examination results of the Education Department of South Sulawesi Province for secondary school in Makassar shows the differenere between schools in Makassar. Results show that the majority of schools are at an urisatisfactory level. However, there are some schools that achieve a high level of performance. This situation prompted researcher to conduct a multi-site case study to identify the leadership styles of principals, teachers' attitudes and behaviors, school facilities, parent and community involvement, and school culture of high-performing and low-performing schools in Makassar. 1n order to achieve this objective, a qualitative approach using multi-case study research design was utilized. Semi structured interviews, observations, and document analysis were used to collect data. The sample consists of two highperforming and two low-performing secondary schools in the city of Makassar. Four school principals and 12 teachers of the schools were chosen using purposive sampling technique to be respondents of the study. Data was analyzed using thematic analysis technique. This study found that the factors that differentiate between high-performing and low-performing schools were; (1) The leadership styles of principals that emphasizes on teaching and learning, controlling students' discipline, ensuring teachers' understand the school's vision, and conducting teachers development programs, (2) The level of commitment, motivation and self-efficacy of teachers were at high level, (3) The school culture which focuses on students learning, and orderly school environment. This study has contributed to the development of knowledge in the field of high-performing schools in Indonesia. This study suggests that if a school wants to achieve high-performing level, principals must exercise leadership styles emphasizing on teaching and learning, ensure that teachers' commitment, motivation and self-efficacy are at high level, and has a culture that focuses on teaching and learning, and orderly school environment.
format	Thesis
qualification_name	Ph.D.
qualification_level	Doctorate
author	Bakkareng, Hasmirati
author_facet	Bakkareng, Hasmirati
author_sort	Bakkareng, Hasmirati
title	Sekolah menengah atas berprestasi tinggi dan rendah di Kota Makassar, Indonesia
title_short	Sekolah menengah atas berprestasi tinggi dan rendah di Kota Makassar, Indonesia
title_full	Sekolah menengah atas berprestasi tinggi dan rendah di Kota Makassar, Indonesia
title_fullStr	Sekolah menengah atas berprestasi tinggi dan rendah di Kota Makassar, Indonesia
title_full_unstemmed	Sekolah menengah atas berprestasi tinggi dan rendah di Kota Makassar, Indonesia
title_sort	sekolah menengah atas berprestasi tinggi dan rendah di kota makassar, indonesia
granting_institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department	Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts & Sciences
publishDate	2018
url	https://etd.uum.edu.my/6908/1/DepositPermission_s92743.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/6908/2/s92743_01.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/6908/3/s92743_02.pdf
_version_	1747828126637883392
spelling	my-uum-etd.69082021-08-09T06:07:18Z Sekolah menengah atas berprestasi tinggi dan rendah di Kota Makassar, Indonesia 2018 Bakkareng, Hasmirati Sin, Ishak Kasim, Abd Latif Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts & Sciences Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts and Sciences LB1603 Secondary Education. High schools The examination results of the Education Department of South Sulawesi Province for secondary school in Makassar shows the differenere between schools in Makassar. Results show that the majority of schools are at an urisatisfactory level. However, there are some schools that achieve a high level of performance. This situation prompted researcher to conduct a multi-site case study to identify the leadership styles of principals, teachers' attitudes and behaviors, school facilities, parent and community involvement, and school culture of high-performing and low-performing schools in Makassar. 1n order to achieve this objective, a qualitative approach using multi-case study research design was utilized. Semi structured interviews, observations, and document analysis were used to collect data. The sample consists of two highperforming and two low-performing secondary schools in the city of Makassar. Four school principals and 12 teachers of the schools were chosen using purposive sampling technique to be respondents of the study. Data was analyzed using thematic analysis technique. This study found that the factors that differentiate between high-performing and low-performing schools were; (1) The leadership styles of principals that emphasizes on teaching and learning, controlling students' discipline, ensuring teachers' understand the school's vision, and conducting teachers development programs, (2) The level of commitment, motivation and self-efficacy of teachers were at high level, (3) The school culture which focuses on students learning, and orderly school environment. This study has contributed to the development of knowledge in the field of high-performing schools in Indonesia. This study suggests that if a school wants to achieve high-performing level, principals must exercise leadership styles emphasizing on teaching and learning, ensure that teachers' commitment, motivation and self-efficacy are at high level, and has a culture that focuses on teaching and learning, and orderly school environment. 2018 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/6908/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/6908/1/DepositPermission_s92743.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/6908/2/s92743_01.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/6908/3/s92743_02.pdf text eng public Ph.D. doctoral Universiti Utara Malaysia Abdul Karim Mohd Nor. (l989). Characteristics of effective rural secondary schools in Malaysia. Tesis Ph.D. University of Wisconsin, Madison. Abuddin Nata (2010). Manajemen pendidikan: Mengetahui kelemahan pendidikan di Indonesia Bogor: Kencana. Aladejana, F., & Aderibigbe, 0. (2007). Science laboratory environment and academic performance. Journal ScienceEducational Technology, 16, 500-506. Allen, N. J. & Meyer, J. P. (l990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1-18. Allinder, R. M. (1994). The relationship between efficacy and the instructional practices of special education teachers and consultants. Teacher Education and Special Education, 17, 86-95. Allison, R. P. (2012). Transformative leadership for learning: Ensuring high levels of learning for all students. Doctor of Education in Educational Organization and Leadership, Graduate College of University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Anwar Arifin. (2005). Analisis isi alas penjelasan Undang-undang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional Nomor 20 tahun 2003. Jakarta: Direktorat Tenaga Kependidikan Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. Ashton, P. T. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A motivational paradigm for effective teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 35, 28-32. Arumugan, R., Cheah, H. M., Yahya, D., Yaakob, D., & Rozlina, K., (2015). Relationship between principals' transformational leadership style and secondary school teacher' commitment. Asian Social Science, 11(15), 221-228. Arnold, D.H., Zeljo,A. & Doctoroff ,G.L. (2008). Parent involvement in preschool: Predictors and the relation of involvement to prelitery development. School Psychology Review, 37(1), 74-90. Arzi, H. (2003). Enhancing science education laboratory environment: More than wall, benches and widgets. Dim. Fraser, B.J., &Tobin, K.G. (Eds). International Handbook of Science Education, Vol. (1), Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Austin, G. R. (1978). Process evaluation: A comprehensive study of outliers. Baltimore, MD: Maryland Department of Education (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED160644). Retrieved October 3, 2009 from: ERIC Azham, Md. Ali dan Hamidah, Yusof. (2011). Quality in Qualitative Studies: The Case of Validity, Reliability and Generalizability Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting, 5(1) 25-64. Averch, H. A., Carroll, S. J., Donaldson, T. S., Kiesling, H.J. & Pincus, J. (1974). How effective is schooling: A critical review of research . Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation. Atkinson, (1964). Motivation in fantasy, action and society. New Jersey: D. Van Narst and Company,Inc. Awanis, M., Ainunmadiah, M. N., & Siti, N. I., (2016). Tahap efikasi guru dan hubungannya dengan pencapaian sekolah di sekolah-sekolah menengah dalam daerah Bachok. Proceeding of ICECRS, I. 312-326 ISSN. 2548-6160 UUMUMSIDA, 25-27 October 2016, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21070/picecrs.vli1.500313. Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy, dalam V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.). Encyclopedia of human behavior. New York: Academic Press. (Reprinted in H. Friedman [Ed.], Encyclopedia of mental health. San Diego: Academic Press, 1998), 4, 71-81. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman and Company. Bandura, A. (1999). Self-efficacy in changing societies. Camb1idge,UK: Cambridge University Press. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215. Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitif development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117-148. Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. H. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 586-598. Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism m human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122-147. Baron, R.A., & J. Greenberg. (1990). Behavior in organization: Understanding and managing the human side of work, third edition. Toronto: Allyn and Bacon. Bass, B. (1990). Bass and Stogdill's handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications. New York: Macmillian. Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. Bass, B.M. dan Avolio B. J. (1990). Manual for the multifactor leadership questionaree. Alo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectation. New York: Free Press. Baum, J. R., Locke, E. A., & Kirkpatrick, S. A. (1998). A longitudinal study of the relation of vision and vision communication to venture growth in entrepreneurial films. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 43-54. Baker, L. (1999). Opp01tunities at home and in the community that foster reading engagement In J.T. Guthrie & D. Alvermann (Eds.), Engagement in reading: Processes, practices, and policy implications (pp. 105-133). NewYork: Teachers College Press. Berg, B. L. (2004). Qualitative research method for the social sciences (5th ed). Boston: Pearson. Berg, B. L. (2007). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (6th Ed). San Francisco: Pearson Education, Inc. Billingsley, B. S., & Cross, L. H. (1992). Predictors of commitment, job satisfaction, and intent to stay in teaching: A comparison of general and special educators. The Journal of Special Education, 25(4), 453-471. Black, S. (2001). Morale matters. American School Board Journal, January, 40-43. Blase, J. R. & Blase, J. (1998). Handbook of instructional leadership: How really good principals promote teaching and learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. Beach, D. & Reinhartz, J. (2000). Supervisory leadership: Focus on instruction. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon. Bogdan, R. C., & Bikien, S. K. (2003). Qualitative research for education: An introductionto theories and methods (4 ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc. Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1992). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Bossert, S. T., Dwyer, D., Rowan, B., & Lee, G. (1982). The instructional management role of the principal. Educational Administration Quarterly, 18 (3), 34-64. Boyer, D. P. (2012). A study of the relationship between the servant leader principal on school culture and student achievement in the Lower Kuskokwim School District, Ijazah Ed.D Grand Canyon University. 125 p; 3498714. Brannen, J. (1997). Memadu metode penelitian kualitatif dan kuantitatif, Pustaka Pela jar, Y ogyakarta. Brookover, W. B., Beady, C., Flood, P., Schweitzer, J., & Wisenbaker, J. (1979). School social system and students achievement: Schools make a difference. New York: Praeger. Brookover, W. B., & Lezotte, L. W. (1979). Changes in school characteristics coincident with changes in student achievement. East Lansing: Institute for Research on Teaching, College of Education, Michigan University. Brink H. I. L. (1993). Validity and realbility in qualitative research Curationis. 16(2), 35-38. doi: 10.4102/curationis.vl6i2.1396. Bruce. A, Lloyd. J, W., & Kennedy. M, J. (2012). Targets of self-monitoring: Productivity, accuracy, and attention, dalam Bryan G. Cook, Melody Tankersley, Timothy J. Landrum (eds.) Classroom Behavior, Contexts, and Interventions (Advances in Learning and Behavioral Disabilities, (25) Emerald Group Publishing Limited, l - 21. Brookover, W., Schweitzer, J., Schneider, J., Beady, C., Flood, P., & Wisenbaker, J. (1978). Elementary school social climate and school achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 15, l37-156. 301-318. Brophy, J. E., & Good, T. I. (1986). Teacher behaviour and student achievement. Dalam M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan. Buchanan, B. (2007). Sick buildings, sick students. American School Board Journal, 194(6), 48-50. Retrieved from MasterFILE Premier database. Bums, J.M. (1978). Leadership, New York: Harper Colophon Books. Byrne, B. M. (1993). Burnout: Testing for the validity, replication, and invariance of Causal structure across elementary, intermediate, and secondary teachers. American Education Research Journal, 31 (3), 645-673 Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (1999). Diagnosis and changing organizational culture based on the computing value framework. Reading, MA:Wesley. Candis, Y.H. (2003). The Home Enviroment of Gifted Puerto Rican Children. Diperoleh Mac 3, 2008 daripada http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/ncbepubs/symposia/ third.html Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions: Sage Publications the University of California. 0761901434, 9780761901433. Creswell, J. W. (2010). Research design pendekatan kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan mixed (Ed. ke-3).Yogyakaita. Celep, C. (2000). Teachers' organizational commitment in educational organizations, in national forum of Teacher Education Journal, 10(3), ED452179. Chapman, D. W. (1993). Teacher incentives m the third world, Teaching and Teacher Education, 9(3), 301-316. Chapman, C., Muijs, D., Reynolds, D., Sammons, P., & Teddlie, C. (2015). Effective school processes, dalam The Routledge international handbook of educational effectiveness and improvement: Research, policy, and practice. Routledge. Dicapai pada: 31 Disember 2016. https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/ 97813l5679488.ch3 Cheng Y. C. (1996). Schools-based management: A mechanism for development. The Falmer Press Washington, D.C. Cheng, Y.C., Tsui, K.T., K. W. Chow, & M. M. C. Mok (eds.) (2002). Subject teaching and teacher education in the new century: Research and innovation. Hong Kong & Dordrecht: Hong Kong Institute of Education & Kluwer Academic Puhlishers. (pp.1-544) (22 chapters). Chism, N.V.N. (2006). Challenging traditional assumptions and rethinking learning spaces. Dim. Oblinger, D.G. (Ed.). Learning Spaces, him. 2.0-2.12. Educause. Retrieved from www.educause.edu/learningspaces [15 September 2007]. Coladarci, T. (1992). Teachers' sense of efficacy and commitment to teaching, Journal of Experimental Education, 60 (4), 323-37. Cole, P. (2012). Linking effective professional learning with effective teaching practice. The Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. Cole, M. S., Field, H. S., & Harris, S. G. (2004). Student learning motivation and psychological hardiness: Interactive effects on students' reactions to a management class. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 3(1), 64-85. Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. F., McPaitland, J., Mood, A. M., & Weinfeld, F. D.(1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office. Cole, M. S., HaITis Switzerland, S. G., & Bemert, J. B. (2006). Exploring the implications of vision, appropriateness, and execution of organizational change: USA Leadership & Organization Development Joumal, 27 (5), 352-367. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Connie. (2013). The influence of professional competence, work motivation, and innovativeness on the performance of physics teacher. 2nd International Seminar on Quality and Affordable Education, (ISQAE 2013)* Universitas Negeri Jakarta. Cox, T. (1991). The multicultural organization. Academy of Management Executive, 5, 34-47. Cybulski, T. G ., Hoy, W.K., & Scott, R. S. (2005). The roles of collective efficacy of teachers and fiscal efficiency in student achievement, Journal of Educational Administration, 43 (5), 439 - 461 . Cynthia Uline, Megan Tschannen-Moran. (2008). The walls speak: the interplay of quality facilities, school climate, and student achievement, Journal of Educational Administration, 46(1), 55-73. Darling-Hammond, L. (1992). Teaching and knowledge: Policy issues posed by alternate certification for teachers. Peabody Journal of Education, 67(3), 123-154. Davis, G. A., & Thomas, M. A. (1989). Effective schools and effective teachers. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Day, C., & Sammons, P. (2013). Successful leadership: A review of the international literature. University of Nottingham. Day, C. , Johansson, 0., & Moller, J. (2011). Sustaining improvement in students learning and achivement: The importance of resilience in leadership, Dalam Moos, L., Johansson, 0. & Day, C. (Eds), How school principals sustain success over time. Dordrecht: Springer. Day, C., Sammons, P., Leithwood, K., Hopkins, D., Harris, A., Gu, Q., & Brown, E. (2010). Ten Strong Claims about Successful School Leadership, The National College for School Leadership, Nottingham. Deal, T. E., & Peterson, K. D. (1999). Shaping School Culture: The heart of leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. Deal, T. E., & Kennedy, A. (1983). Culture and school performance. Educational Leadership, 40(5), 140-141. Dean, J., & Bowe, D. (1994). Management theory and total quality improving research and practice through theory development. Academy of management Review, 19, 392-418. DeBevoise, W. (1984) Synthesis of research on the principal as instructional leader. Education Leadership. Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum Press Dembo, H., & Gibson, S. (1985). Teacher' sence of efficacy: an important factor in school improvement. The Elementary school Journal, 86, 173-184 Denzin,N. K., & Lincoln,Y. S. (Editor). (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage. Denzin, N. K. (1978). Sociological Methods. New York: McGraw-Hill. Departmen Pendidikan Nasional,(2005). Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2005, Tentang Guru dan Dasen, Jakarta: Depdiknas. Dimmock, C., & Walker, A. (2005). Educational leadership: Culture and diversity. London: Sage Publication. Dubinsky, A. J., Yamarino, F. J & Jolson, M.A. (1994). Closeness of supervision and salesperon work outcomes: An Alternate Perspective. Journal of Business Research, (29), 225-237. DuFour, R., & Eaker, R. (1988). Profesional learning communities at work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement. Bloomington, IN: National Education Service & Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development. Eady, C., & Zepeda, S. J. (2007). Evaluation, supervision, and staff development under mandated reform: The perceptions and practices of rural middle school principals. The Rural Educator, 28 (2), 1-27. Earthman, G. I., & Lamasters, L. (2007). A paradigm of research: The relationship between student performance and school building condition, 13 years in development (1993-006). Illinois: Chicago. A symposium paper presented to the annual meeting of AERA. Edmonds, R. (1979). Effective schools for the urban poor, Educational Leadership, 37(1), 16-18. Eells, R. J. (2011). Meta-analysis of the relationship between collective teacher efficacy and student achievement. Dissertations Paperl 33. http://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/133. Firestone, W. A., & Pennell, J. R. (1993). Teacher commitment, working conditions, and differential incentive policies. Review of Educational Research, 63 (4), 489-525. Firestone, W., & Rosenblum, S. (1988). Building commitment in urban high schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 10, 285 - 299. Fraser, B.J. (1998). Classroom environment instruments: Development, validity and applications. Learning Environment Research: An International Journal, 1, 7-33. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. (2004). School engagement: potential of the concept: state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research,74, 59-119. Freiberg, H. J. (Ed) (1999). School climate: Measuring, improving, and sustaining healthy learning environments. London: Falmer Press. Fried, R. L. (2001). The passionate teacher: A practical guide. Boston: Beacon Press. Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a culture of change, jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA. Fook, C. Y. & Sidhu, G. K. (2004). Stail Kepimpinan dan Kepuasan Ke1ja di Kalangan Guru Sekolah Menengah, Jurnal Penyelidikan Pendidikan, Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia Forward, Peabody Journal of Education, 3 (86), 291-303. Garza, E. Jr., Drysdale, L., Gun-, D., Jacobson, S., & Merchant, B. (2014). Leadership for school success: Lessons from effective principals. International Journal of Educational Management, 28(7), 798 - 811. Gibson, S. & Dembo. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Education Psychology, 76 (4), 569-582. Glatthom, A. A. (1990). Supervisory leadership: Introduction to instructional supervision. New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers, 177-179. Glatthom, A. A., & Fox, L. E., (1996) Quality teaching through professional development. Principals taking action series (Edition 2): Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. Glickman, C., Gordon, S., & Ross-Gordon, J. (2001). Supervision and instructional leadership (5th Ed). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon. Glickman, C. D., Gordon, S. P., & Ross-Gordon, J. M. (2005). The basic guide to supervision and instructional leadership. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon. Goodlad, J. L. (1984). A place called school. New York: McGraw-Hill. Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K. & Woolfolk, A. (2000). Collective teacher efficacy: Its meaning, measure, and effect on student achievement. American Education Research Journal, 37(2), 479-507. Green, R. L. (2010). The four dimensions of principal leadership: A framework/or leading 21st century schools. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon. Guba, E. G. & Lincoln, Y. S., (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Guay, F., Chanal, J., Ratelle, C. F., Marsh, H. W., Larose, S., & Boivin, M. (2010). Intrinsic, identified, and controlled types of motivation for school subjects in young elementary school children, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80 (4), 711-735. Guba, E. (1981 ). Criteria for Assessing the Trnstworthiness of Naturalistic Inquiries. Educational Technology Research and Development, 29 (2), 75-91. Guba. E.G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research.In N. K. Senzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Gurr, D. (2015). A model of successful school leadership from the international successful school principal ship Project, Societies, 5(1), 36-150. Gurr, D., Drysdale, L., & Mulford, B. (2005). Successful principal leadership: Australian case studies, Journal of Educational Administration, 43(6), 539-551. Guruvalah. (26 September 2011). Hubungan antara kepimpinan situasional dan motivasi berprestasi dengan Kine1ja Ke1ja. Journal Guruvalah.Di petik dari HTTP:/GuruvalahDot.Com/Bab2researchretnopdf Guskey, T. R. (1988). Teacher efficacy, self-concept and attitudes toward the implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(1), 63-69. Hackman, J. R., & Wageman, R. (1995). Total quality management: emprical, conceptual, and practical issue. Administrative Science Quarterly, 309-342. Hall, G., & Hord, S. (2002). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes, Allyn & Bacon, Boston, MA. Hallinger, P. (2010). A review of three decades of doctoral studies using the principal instructional management rating scale: a lens on methodological progress in educational leadership and management, paper prepared for presentation at the Annual Meeting of the University Council of Educational Administration, New Orleans, LA. Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for learning: lessons from 40 years of empirical research, Journal of Educational Administration, (49), 2, 125-142. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1996). Reassessing the principal's role in school effectiveness: a review of empirical research, 1980-1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 5-44. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1998). expoloring the proncipal's contribution to school effectiveness: 1980-1995. School effectiveness and school improvement, 9(2), 157-191 Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2002). What do you call people with visions? The role of vision, mission and goals in school leadership and improvement, in Leithwood, K.A. and Hallinger, P. (Eds),Second International Handbook of Educational Leadership and Administration, 2nd ed., Kluwer, Dordrecht. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2010). Collaborative leadership and school improvement: understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning. School Leadership and Management, 30(2), 95-110. Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1985). Assessing the instructional leadership behavior of principals. Elementa,y School Journal, 86(2), 217-48. Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1986). The social context of effective schools. American Journal of Education,94(3), 328-355. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2014). Modeling the longitudinal effects of school leadership on teaching and learning", Journal of Educational Administration, 52(5), 653-681, doi: 10.1108/JEA-08-2013-0097 Halpin, A.W., & €roft, D. B. (1963). The organizational climate of Administration Center, University of Chicago. Halpin, A. (1966 ). Theory and research in administration. Macmillan: New York. Hanushek, E. A. (1997). Assessing the effects of school resources on the student performance an update. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(2),141-164. Henson, R. K. (2001). Teacher self-efficacy: Substantive implications and measurement dilemmas. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Educational Research Exchange (College Station, TX, January 26, 2001). Hargreaves, D. (1995). School Culture, School Effectiveness and School Improvement, School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 6, (91), 23-46. Harris, A. (2003). The changing context of leadership: research, the01y and practice, in Harris, A., Day, C., Hopkins, D., Hadfield , M., Hargreaves, A. and Chapman, C. (Eds), Effective Leadership for School Improvement, Routledge Falmer, New York, NY, 9-25. Harris, A. (2005). Contemporary perspectives on school effectiveness and school improvement, in Harris, A. and Bennet, N. (Eds), School Effectiveness and School Improvement: Alternative Perspective, Continuum, London 7-25. Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. Routledge. New York, NY. Heck, R.H. , & Hallinger, P. (2010). Collaborative leadership effects on school improvement: Integrating unidirectional- and reciprocal-effects models. The Elementary School Journal, 111(2), 226-252. Herzberg, F. I. (1966). Work and the nature of man.Oxford. Hofman, W. H. A., & Hofman, R.H. (2011). Smart management in effective schools: effective management configurations in general and vocational education in the Netherlands, Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(4), 620-645. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences. London: Sage. Hoy, W. K. (2012). School characteristics that make a difference for the achievement of all students: A 40-year academic odyssey. Journal of Educational Administration. Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (1991). Educational administration: Theo,y, research, and practice, (4th edition). New York: McGraw-Hill. Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2001). Educational administration: Theory, research and practice, (6th edition). Boston: McGraw-Hill. Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2005). Educational Administration, (7th ed.), McGraw-Hill, NewYork, NY. Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2008). Educational Administration, McGraw- Hill, NewYork, NY. (8th ed.), Hoy, W. K., Tarter, C. J., & Bliss, J. R. (1990). Organizational climate, school health and effectiveness: A comprehensive analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 26(3), 260-279. Hoy, W. K., & Woolfolk, A. E. (1993). Teacher's sense of efficacy and the organizational health of schools. Elementary School Journal, 93(4), 355-372. Houtenville, A., & Conway, K. (2008). Parental effort, school resources, and student achievement. Journal of Human Resources, 43, 437-453. Huff, T., Brockmeier, L., Leech, D., Martin, E., Pate, J., & Siegrist, G. (2011). Principal and school-level effects on student achievement. National Teacher Education Journal, 4(2), 67-76. Hulpia, H., Devos, G., & Van Keer, H. (2010). The influence of distributed leadership on teachers' organizational commitment: A multilevel approach. Journal of Educational Research, 103, 40-52. Imran, A. (2008). Kepemimpinan kepala sekolah dalam mengelola sekolah berprestasi, Yogyakarta: Aditya Media. Jacobson, S. (2011). Leadership effects on student achievement and sustained school success, International Journal of Educational Management, 25(1), 33-44. Jacobson, S. & Bezzina, C. (2008), The effects of leadership on student academic/affective achievement. dalam Crow, G., Lumby. J. and Pashiardis, P. (eds). The International Handbook on the Preparation and Development of School Leaders. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publicatin, PP. 80-102. Jackson, Philip W. (1968). Life in classrooms.New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc. Jahanian, R., & Mitra Ebrahimi, M. (2013). Principles for Educational Supervision and Guidance. Journal of Sociological Research 4(2), 380-390. Jazzar, M. & Algozzine, B. (2006). Critical issues in educational leadership. Boston: Pearson. Javed, U. (2012). Leadership for learning: A case study in six public and private schools C?f Pakistan. Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, University of Birmingham Jencks, C. S., Smith, M., Ackland, H., Bane, M. J., Cohen, D., & Ginter, H. (1972). Inequality: A reassessment of the effect of family and schooling in America New York: Basic Books. Johnson, S. M. (1986). Incentives for Teachers: What Motivates, What Matters, Educational Administration Quarterly, 22(3), 54-79. Kanfer, R., Chen, G. , & Pritchard, R. D. (Eds.) (2008). Work motivation: Past, present, and future. New York: Taylor and Francis Group. Kanammah alp Manukaram, Melissa Ng Lee Yen Abdullah & Shahizan Hasan. (2013). Pengaruh Faktor Keluarga Terhadap Pembelajaran Regulasi Kendiri Murid Sekolah Rendah. Malaysian Journal of Leaming and Instruction: Vol. 109: 179-201. Meriam, S.B. 2001. Kell. J, Stephan J., & Motowidlo. (2012). Deconstructing organizational commitment: Associations among its affective and cognitive components, personality antecedents, and behavioral outcomes, Journal of Applied Social Psychology 42(1):213-251. Kerlinger, F. N. (1973). Foundations of behavioral research (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rhinehart, and Winston. Kirk, D. J. & Jones, T.C (2004) Effective school. Dallas, TX: Pearson Education. Retrieved December 9, 2013 from pearsoneduction.com Kondakci, Y., & Sivri, H. (2014). Salient characteristics of high-performing Turkish elementary schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 52(2), 254-272. Kotter, J.P. (1988). The leadership factor. New York: Free Press. Kort, M. (1987). Motivation: The challenge for today's health promoter : Canadian Nurse, 83(9), 16-18. Krug, S. E. (1992). Instructional leadership: A constructivist perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 28(3), 430-443. Kushman, J. W. (1992). The organizational dynamics of teacher workplace commitment: A study of urban elementary and middle scholls. Educational Administration Quaterly, 28(1), 5-42. Kythreotis, A., Pashiardis, P., & Kyriakides, L. (2010).The influence of school leadership styles and culture on students' achievement in Cyprus primary schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 48(2), 218-240. Lee, M., Walker, A., & Chui, Y. L. (2012). Contrasting effects of instructional leadership practices on student learning in a high accountability context. Journal of Educational Administration, 50(5). Leithwood, K. (1994). Leadership for school restructuring. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30, 498-518. Leithwood, K. (1992). The move toward transformational leadership. Educational Leadership, 49(5), 8-12. Leithwood, K. (2006). Teacher working conditions that matter: Evidence for Change, Toronto, Elementary Teachers Federation of Ontario. Leithwood, K. A., & Jantzi, D. (1999). Transformational school leadership effects: A replication. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 10(4), 451-479. Leithwood, K. & Jantzi, D. (2005). A review of transformational school leadership research 1996-2005. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4, 177-199. Leithwood, K., & Stager, M. (1989). Expertise in principal problem solving, Educational Administration Quarterly, 25(2), 126-61. Leithwood, K., & Sun, J. (2012). Meta-analytic review of unpublished research. The nature and effects of transformational school leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(3), 387-423. Leithwood, K., Anderson, S., Mascall, B., & Strauss, T. (2010). School leaders' influences on student learning: the four paths, in Bush, T., Bell, L., Middlewood, D. (Eds),The Principles of Educational Leadership and Management, Sage Publications, London. Lezotte, L. (Oktober 1989). Elemen of efective school waterford, Mine: Speech to administrative council, water ford seol Districk. Attributed To Frank Maki Arola, Chancel for of new york city School (Juli 1978 to february 1983). Lieberman, A. (1990). Schools as collaborative cultures: Creating the future now. Bristol, Press. Li, L., Hallinger, P., & Ko, J. (2016). Principal leadership and school capacity effects on teacher learning in Hong Kong. International Journal of Educational Management, 30(1), 76-100. DOI 10.1108/IJEM-03-2014-0035 Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. Lindahl, R. (2011). The crucial role of assessing the school's climate in planning school improvement. Educational Planning, 20(1), 16-30. Little, J.W. (1993). Teachers' professional development in a climate of educational reform, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15 (2), 129-51. Louis, K. S., Dretzke, B., & Wahlstrom, K. (2010). How does leadership affect student achievement? Results from a national U.S. survey. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21, 315-336. Louis, K.S., Kruse, S.D., & Associates (1995). Professionalism and community: Perspectives reforming urban schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. MacNeil, A. J., Prater, D. L., & Busch, S. (2009). The effects of school culture and climate on student achievement. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 12(1), 73-84. doi : 10.1080/13603120701576241 MacBeath, J. (2004). International comparisons. Education Journal, 77, 21. MacNeil, A., & Maclin, V. (2005). Building a learning community: The culture and climate of Schools. Retrieved from the OpenStax QA Web site: http://legacytextbook-qa.cnx.org/content/ ml 2922/1.2/ Maehr, M. L., & Midgley, C. (1996). Transforming school cultures, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.JEA 48, 2. Mahdikhani, Z. (2016). An Overview of Motivation: The Challenges and the Importance of Motivation for Second Language Acquisition; Dept. of English, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University Zanjan, Iran Journal for the Study of English Linguistics,4,(1),53 ISSN 2329-7034, www.macrothink.org/jsel Maslowski, R. (2006). A review of inventories for diagnosing school culture. Journal of Educational Administration, 44(1),6-35, doi: http://dx.doi.org/l 0.1108/09578230610642638 Marimuthu, T. (1990). Pengenalan sosilogi Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Petaling Jaya: Fajar Bakti. Sdn. Bhd. Mart C.T., (2013). A Passionate Teacher: Teacher Commitment and Dedication to Student Leaming. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, (2), 1: 2226-6348. Marzano, R. (2003). What works in schools: Translating research into action. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria, VA. Maslow, A.H. (1943). A Theory of Human Motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370-96. Merriam, S. B. (1998), Qualitative research and Case Study Applications in Education. San Fransisco, CA: Josssey-Bass. Meyer, J. P. & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace theory research and application. California: Saga Publications. McClelland, D. C. (1961). The achieving society. New York: Free Press. McGuigan, L., & Hoy, W. K. (2006). Principal leadership: creating a culture of academic optimism to improve achievement for all students, Leadership and Policy in Schools, 5(3), 203-229. McCollum, Elan C., & Yoder, Nicholas P. (2011). School culture, teacher regard, and academic aspirations among middle school students: Middle Grades Research Journal, 6(2), 65-74. Mulyasa, E (2011). Menjadi guru professional: Menciptakan pembelajaran kreatif dan menyenangkan, Cet. 10; Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya. McKenzie, P., Nugroho, D., Ozolins, C., McMillan, J., Sumarto, S., Toyamah, N., Febriany, V., Sodo, R. J., Bima, L., & Sim, A. A. (2014). Study on teacher absenteeism in Indonesia 2014. Jakarta: Education Sector Analytical and Capacity Development Partnership (ACDP). Milam, A. J., FmT-Holden, C. D. M., & Leaf, P. J. (2010). Perceived school and neighborhood safety, neighborhood violence and academic achievement in urban school children, Urban Review, 42(5), 458-467. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis - An expanded Sourcebook. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Mintzberg, H. (1973). The nature of managerial work. New York: Harper and Row. Mohd Yusri Ibrahim. (2012). Model kepimpinan pengajaran pengetua, efikasi dan kompetensi pengajaran. Terengganu, Univeriti Malaysia Terengganu. Morrow, P. C. (1983). Concept redundancy in organizational research: The case of work commitment, Academy of Management Review, 8, 486-500. Mortimore, P. (1991). Effective schools from a British perspective, Chapter 7. Jn J. R. Bliss, W. A., Firestone & C. E., Richards (Ed.), Rethinking effective schools: Research andpractice. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Mortimore, P., Sammons, P., Stoll, L., Lewis., D., & Ecob, R (l988a). The effects of school membership on pupils' educational outcomes. Research Papers in Education, 3(1): 3-26. Mortimore, P., Sammons, P., Ecob, R., & Stoll, L. (1988b). School Matters: The Junior Years, Open Books, Salisbury. Morgan, M., Kitching, K., & O'Leary, M. (2007). The psychic rewards of teaching: Examining global, national and local influences on teacher motivation. Paper presented at the AERA Annual Meeting, Chicago. Mowday, R. T., Porter, L. W., & Steers, R. M. (1982). Employee-organization linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism and turnover. New York: Academic Press. Muhammad Ma'lum. (2016). Kepimpinan guru besar di Sekolah rendah berprestasi tinggi dan berprestasi rendah. PhD thesis, Universiti Utara Malaysia. Muhammad Faizal A. G. (2008). Pembentukan model keberkesanan dan penambahbaikan sekolah di Malaysia. PhD Tesis, Universiti Malaya. Kuala Lumpur. Mulford, B., & Silins, H. (2003). Leadership for organizational learning and improved student outcomes - what do we know?. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33 (2): 175-195. Mulford, B., & Silins, H. (2009). Revised models and conceptualization of successful school principalship in Tasmania", in Mulford, B., Edmunds, B. (Eds), Successful School Principalship in Tasmania, Faculty of Education, University of Tasmania, Launceston,. Mulford, B., & Sil ins, H. (2010). Organisational learning in schools. In E. Baker, B. McGaw & P. Peterson (eds). International encyclopaedia of education. (Third Edition). Oxford: Elsevier. (5), 143-150. Mulford, B., & Silins. H. (2011). Revised models and conceptualisation of successful school principalship for improved student outcomes, International Journal of Educational Management, 25 (1), 61 - 82. Murphy & Louis, K. S. (Eds.).(1999). Handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 337-358). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Murphy, J. (2005). Connecting teacher leadership and school improvement, Corwin Press, Newbury Park, CA. Murphy, M. M. (2006). The history and philosophy of education: Voices of educational pioneers. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education. Nanus, B. (1992). Visionary leadership: Creating a compelling sense of direction for your organization. San Francisco, C.A: Jossy-Boss Publishers. Nahid N., A. (2011). Teachers: emotional intelligence, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment. Journal of Workplace Learning. 24(4), 256-269. Neville, R. F., & Garman, N. B. (1999). The philosophical perspective on supervision. In G. Firth & E. Pajak (Eds.), Handbook of Research on School Supervision (pp. 200-241). New York: NY: Simon & Schuster Macmillan. Nor Asikin Salleh. (2008). Model sekolah berkesan: Satu kajian kes sekolahsekolah Kebangsaan luar bandar. PhD thesis, Universiti Utara Malaysia. Noraini Mohamed Noh, Che Nidzam Che Ahmad, Mazlini Adnan, Marzita Puteh & Mohd Hairy Ibrahim. (2013). Pengarnhkeselesaan terma bilik darjah terhadap keselesaan pembelajaran pelajar bermasalah. Proceedings of International Conference on Special Education 2013, Banda Acheh Indonesia. Norazlinda, S., & Surendren, S., (2013). Pengaruh sikap guru terhadap pembuatan keputusan ke atas komitmen guru di sekolah: galakan pengetua sebagai pengantara. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 10, 271-294. Noor Erma Abu & Leong Kwan Eu. (2014). Hubungan antara sikap, minat, pengajaran guru dan pengaruhnya rakan sebaya terhadap pencapaian matematik tingkat 4 : Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik - Bil. 2 lsu 11. Faculty of Education University of Malaya 50603 Kuala Lumpur. Oberholster, F. R., & Taylor,V. J .W. (1999). Spiritual experience and the organizational commitment of college faculty, 2 (1), 57-78. OECD/ Asian Development Bank (2015). Education in Indonesia: Rising to the Challenge, Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264230750-en OECD (2014). Lessons from PISA for the United States: Strong Performers and Successful Reformers in Education, OECD Publishing, Paris. OEDC (2012). Equity and Quality in Education: Supporting Disadvantaged Students and Schools. OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/l0.l787/9789264130852-cn Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543-578 Pangeni, K. P. (2013). Factors determining educational quality: Student mathematics achievement in Nepal. International Journal of Educational Development, 34, 30-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2013.03.001 Parasurahman & Lopiyoadi. (2001). Strategi manajemen marketing lembaga pendidikan. Jakarta. Kencana Media. Patton, MQ. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis, HSR: Health Services Research. 34 (5) Part II. pp.1189-1208. Patton., M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications Inc. Patton, M. Q. (1987). Qualitative evaluation methods. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications Inc. Patton, M. Q. (1994). Developmental evaluation. Evaluation Practice 15(3), 311-319. PeITy, C. (1998). Processes of a case study methodology for postgraduate research in marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 32(9/10), 785-803. Peterson, P., Woessman, L., Hanushek, E., & Lastra-Anadon, C. (2011) . Are U.S. students ready to compete: The latest on each state's international standing. Education Next, 11(4), 50-59. Pennings, H.J. M., Tartwijk, J. v., Wubbels T., Claessens, L. C.A., Van Der Want, A.C., & Brekelmans, M. (2014). Real-time teacher-student interactions: A dynamic systems approach. Teaching and Teacher Education, (37), 183-193. Pelletiar, G. L., Levesque, C.S., Legault, L. (2002). Pressure from above and pressure from below as determinants of teachers' motivation and teaching behaviors. Journal of Education Psychology, 94, 186-196. Pidarta, M. (2010). Landasan kependidikan. Cet.l. Jakarta:Rineka Cipta. Pinder, CC. (1998). Work Motivation in Organizational Behavior. Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall. Picucci, A.C., Brownson, A., Kahlert, R., & Sobel, A. (2002). Driven to succeed: highperforming, high-poverty, turnaround middle schools. Volume I: Cross-Case Analysis of High-Performing, High-Poverty, Turnaround Middle Schools. Charles A. Dana Center and the STAR Center; 82 pages; ERIC Document# ED476107. Pierce, J. L., & Newstrom, J. W. (2006). Leaders & the leadership process. New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin. Provasnik, S., Kastberg, D., FeITaro, D., Lemanski, N., Roey, S., & Jenkins, F. (2012). Highlights From TIMSS 2011: Mathematics and Science Achievement of U.S. Fourth- and Eighth-Grade Students in an International Context (NCES 2013-009). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC. Purkey, S. C., & Smith, M. S. (1983). Effective schools: A review. The elementery School Journal, 83(4), 427-452. Raihani. (2008). An Indonesian model of successful school leadership: Journal of Educational Administration, 46 (4), 481-496. Raymona, B. K., & Mitchell, R. M. (2012). The effects of academic optimism on elementary reading achievement. Journal of Educational Administration, 50(6), 773-787. Republik Indonesia. (2003). Undang-undang sistem pendidikan nasional nomor 20 Tahun 2003. (Cet.II); Bandung; Fokusmendia. Republik Indonesia. (2005). Peraturan Pemerintah RI Nomor 19 Tahun 2005 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. Reyes, P. (1992). Preliminary models of teacher orgazational commitment: Implications for restructuring of schools, Medison, WI. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED349680). Reynolds, D. (1995). The efecctive school: an inaugral lecture. Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(2),57-73. Reynolds, D., & Teddlie, C. (2000). The process of school effectiveness. In C. Teddlie & D. Reynolds (Eds.), The International Handbook of School Effectiveness (pp. 134-159). London: Falmer Press. Reynolds, D., Tedd lie, C., Stringfield, S., & Creemers, B. (2002). World class Schools. international perspectives on school effectiveness, Routledge Falmer, London. Reynolds, D., Chapman, C., Kelly, A., Muijs, D., & Sammons, P. (2012). Educational effectiveness: The development of the discipline, the critiques, the defence, and the present debate. Effective Education, 3(2), 1-19. Robinson, V., Hohepa, M., & Lloyd, C. (2009). School leadership and student outcomes: Identifying what works and why. Best evidence synthesis [BES}. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education. Robinson, V., Lloyd, C., & Rowe, K. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: an analysis of the differential effects of leadership types, Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635-74. Robinson, V. M. J., McNaughton, S., & Timperley, H. (2011). Building capacity in a self managing school system: the New Zealand experience, Journal of Educational Administration, 49(6), 720-738. Robbins, V. K. (1996). Exploring the texture of the texts: A guide to socio-rhetorical interpretation. Harrisburg, PA: Trinity Press International. Robbins, S. P., & Coulter. M. (2007). Manajemen. Edisi 8, Jilid 1. Edisi Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta : PT. Indeks. Rorty, 0 . A. (1998). Philosophes on education: New historical perspectives. New York: Routedge Published. Rosenholtz, S. J. (1989). Workplace condition that affect teacher quality and commitment: Implications for teacher induction program. The Elementary School Journal, 89(4), 421-439. Rosenshine, B. (1983). Direct instruction. Dalam M. J. Dunkin (Ed.). The international encyclopedia of teaching and teacher education. Oxford: Pergamon Press. Rozi, M., Abd Latif, K., Sofiah, Z., & Faezah, M. N. (2016). Komitmen guru dan kepuasan kerja Guru di sekolah menengan harian berprestasi tinggi dan rendah di daerah Kota Bharu Kelantan. Pusat Pengajian Pendidikan dan Bahasa Moden Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia. Available online: http ://ojs.umsida.ac.id/index.php/icecrs Article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21070/picecrs. vli1.603 863 Royse, D. (2008). Research methods in social work (5'h edition). Belmont, CA: Thomson Higher Education. Rowley, J. (2002). Using case studies in research. Management Research News, (25)1, 16-27, doi: 10.l108/01409170210782990 Russel, A. H. (2011). The effects of school building condition and school geographical location on student achievement in Alberta: A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Business Administration: University Of Phenix. Rutter, M., Maughan, B., Mortimore, P., Ouston, J., & Smith, A. (1979). Fifteen thousand hours: Secondary schools and their effects on children. Ambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Sahin, S. (2011). Instructional leadership in Turkey and the United States: Teachers' perspectives. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 34, 122-137. Saklofske, D. H., Michayluk, J. 0., & Randhawa, B. S. (1988). Teachers' efficacy and teaching behaviors. Psychological Reports: (63), 407-414. Salfi, N. A. (2011). Successful leadership practices of head teachers for school improvement, Journal of Educational Administration, 49(4), 414-432. Sammons P., Hillman, J., & Mortimore, P. (1995). Characteristics of the effective schools: A review of the school effectiveness research. London: OFSTED and University of London, Institute of Education. Sammons, P., Gu, Q., Day, C., & Ko, J. (2011). Exploring the impact of the school leadership on pupil outcomes: results from a study of academically improved and effective schools in England, International Journal of Educational Management, 25(1), 83-101. Sandoval, J. M. (2010). Student achievement at economically disadvantaged middle school campuses in Texas, Texas A& M University Kingsville. Sanoff, H. (2000). Community participation methoqs in design and planning. New York: Wiley. Schein, E. H. (1995). Organizational and managerial culture as a facilitator or Inhibitor of organizational transformation. Paper presented to the Inaugural Assembly of Chief Executive and Employers in Singapore, June 29, 1995. Schwandt, T. A. (1999). On understanding. Qualitative Inquiry, 5(4), 451-464. Scheerens, J. (1992). Effective schooling, research, th eory and practice, Cassell, London. Scheerens, J. (2015). Theories on educational effectiveness and ineffectiveness. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 26(1), 10-31. http://dx.doi.org/l0.1080/09243453.2013.858754. Scheerens, J., & Bosker, R. (1997). Effective schooling: Research, theory and Practice, Cassell, London. Schoen, L. T., & Teddlie, C., (2008). A new model of school culture: a respon to a call for conceptual claiity, School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19(2), 129-153. Semke C. A., & Sheridan, S. M. (2011). Family-school connections on rural educational settings: A systematic review of the empirical literature (R2Ed Working Paper No. 2011-1). Retrieved from the National Center for Research on Rural Education website: http://r2ed.unl.edu. Senge, P., Cambron-McCabe, N., Lucas, T., Smith, B., Dutton, J., & Kleiner. (2000). learn: A fifth discipline field book/or educators, parents, and everyone. New York: Doubleday. Sergiovanni, T. J. & Stanatt, R. J. (1998). Supervision: A redefinition, (6th edition). New York: McGraw-Hill. Sergiovanni, T. (1992). Moral leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc Sharifah Md Nor. (2000). Keberkesanaan sekolah: Satu perspektil sosiologi. Serdang: Penerbitan Universiti Pertanian Malaysia. Shannon, G. S., & Bylsma, P. (2007). The nine characteristics of high-performing schools: A research-based resource for schools and districts to assist with improving student learning. (2nd Ed.). Olympia, WA: OSPI. Shen, J., Leslie, J.M., Spybrook, J.K., & Ma, X. (2012). Are principal background and school processes relatedto teacher job satisfaction? A multilevel studyusing schools and staffing survey 2003-04, American Educational Research Journal, 49(2), 200-230. Shaw, E. (1999). A guide to the qualitative research process: evidence from a small firm study. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 2(2), 5 9-70. Shenton, A. K. (2004). Press strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects.Education for Information. 22, 63-75. Simmons, M. L. (2013). Teachers' perceptions of their self-efficacy and effects of principal leadership practices on self-efficacy beliefs in low and highperforming elementary schools in South Carolina. Doctor of Education Dissertation, South Carolina State University. Siti, U. M.T., (2013). Research methodological: Understanding the qualitative viewpoint. Kuala Lumpur: Aras Publisher. Sitkin, S., Sutcliffle, K & Schroededer, R. (1994). Distngguishing control from learning in total quality management. Adaemiy Of Management Review 19(3), 537-564. Strauss, A., J. Corbin. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, (2nd. ed.). London: Sage Slavin, R. E. (2000). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Smylie, M. A. ( 1988). The enhancement function of staff development: Organizational and psychological antecedents to individual teacher change. American Educational Research Journal, 25, 1-30. Suryadarma, D.,Suryahadi, A., Sumarto, S., & Rogers, F.H. (2006). Improving student performance in public primary school in developing countries: Evidence from Indonesia. Education Economics Journal, 14(4), 401-423. Soedijarto, (1998). Pendidikan sebagai sarana reformasi mental dalam upaya pembangunan bangsa. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka. Southw011h. (2002). Instructional leadership in School : Reflection and empirical evidence. School Leadership and Management, 22(1).73-91 Stallings, J. & Krasavage, E. M. (1986). Program implementation and student achievement in a four-year Madeline Hunter follow-through project. Elementary School Journal, 2(87). 117-38. Stoll, A., & Fink, A. (1996). Changing our schools. Buckingham: Open University Press. Stone, J. E., Bruce, G. S. & Hursh, D. (2007). Effective schools, common practices: Twelve ingredients of success from Tennessee's Most effective schools. Virginia: Education Consumers Foundation. Retrieved on August 15, 2013. http://goo.gl/YKtlPU. Sukarmin. (2010). Pengaruh tingkah laku kepimpinan pengajaran guru besar atas keafi atan sekolah, komitmen organisasi, efikasi dan kepuasan guru di sekolah-sekolah rendah di Surakarta. Tesis Ph.D, Universiti Utara Malaysia. Sugioyono. (2006). Statistic untuk penelitian.Bandung : Penerbit Alfabeta. Sutarto Hadi. (2002). Effective teacher profesional development for the implementation of realistic mathematics education in Indonesia. Thesis University of Twente: Press print Partners. Teddlie, C., & Reynolds, D. (2000). The international handbook of school effectiveness research. London: Falmer Press. Teddlie, C., & Stringfield, S. (1993). Schools do make a difference: Lesson learned from a 10 year study of school effects. New York: Teachers College Press. Thuwayba A. Al-Barwani, Tayfour S. Albeely & Humaira Al-Suleimani. 2012. Parental Involvement in Higher Education in Oman. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 37(1): 13-24. Thien, L. M., Razak, N. A., & Ramayah, T. (2014). Validating teacher commitment scale using a Malaysian sample. Regional Centre for Educationin Science and Mathematics. l-9. doi: 10.l177/2158244014536744 The World Bank Annual Report (2010) Office of the Publisher, External AfFairs. Teodorovic, J. (2012). Student background factors influencing student achievement in Serbia, Educational Studies, 38(1), 89-110. Tella, A. (2007). The impact of motivation on student's academic achievement and learning outcomes in mathematics among secondary school students in Nigeria Osun State College of Education, Osun State, NIGERIA Townsend, T. (1997). What makes schools effective? A comparison between school communities in Australia and the USA. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 8(3), 311-326. Townsend, T. (2001). Satan or saviuor? An analysis of two decades of school effectiveness research. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 12 (1), 115-129. Tschannen-Moran, M., Bankole, R., Mitchell, R., & Moore, D. (2013). Student academic optimism: A confirmatory factor analysis, Journal of Educational Administration, 50, 150 - 175. Tschannen-Moran, M., Woolfolk-Hoy, A.W., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure, Review of Educational Research, 68 (2), 202-48. Tschannen-Moran, M., and Gareis, C. R. (2004). Principals' sense of efficacy and trust, paper tobe presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 12-16 April, San Diego, CA. Uline, C., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (2008). The walls speak: the interplay of quality facilities, school climate, and student achievement. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(1), 55-73. UNESCO. (2011). The Sector for external relations and public information of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). Paris, France. Usman, Syaikhu, Akhmadi & Suryadarma Daniel. (2007). Patterns of teacher absence in publik primary school in Indonesia; Asia Pacifik, Journal of Education, 27(2), 207-219. Verdis, A., Kriemadis, T., & Pashiardis, P. (2003). Historical, comparative and statistical perspectivesof school effectiveness research: rethinking educational evaluation in Greece, International Journal of Educational Management, 17(4), 155-169. Vislocky, K. L. (1995). The relationship between school culture and student achievement in middle school. Ijazah Doktor Falsafah. College of Education at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Vohra, V. (2014). Using the multiple case study design to decipher contextual leadership behaviors in Indian organizations. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods. 12 (l) 54-65. Waller, W. (1932). The sociology of teaching.New York: Russell & Russell. Walker, D. M. (2015). A case study of school improvement, school effectiveness, and student achievement. Ijazah Doktor Falsafah. Oakland University Rochester, Michigan. Wandr, E. & Brown, G. W. (1987). Essential of Educational Evaluation: Hol Renehart .. Wang, L .L, Chiang. J.M. H., Plaisent, M., & Bernard, P. (2013). The Factor of school effectivennes: an empirical infestigation of internal and external factors of junior high schools in Taiwan. International Journal of Humanities and Applied Science (UHAS). 2(3) 50-54. Wang, A. H.,Walters, A. M., & Thum,Y.M. (2013). Identifying highly effective urban schools: compaiing two measures of school success. International Journal of Educational Management. 27(5) 517-540. Witziers, B., Bosker, R. J., & Kru .. ger, M. L. (2003). Educational leadership and student achievement. The elusive search for an association. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 398 -425. Whatley, A. (1998). Gifted women and teaching: A compatible choice? Roeper Review, 21(1), 17-131. Weber, G. (1971). Inner-city children can be taught to read: Four successful schools. Washington, D.C: Council for Basic Education. Weisberg, D., Sexton, S., Mulhern, J., & Keeling, D. (2010). The widget effect: Our national failure to acknowledge and act on differences in teacher effectiveness from http://widgeteffect.org/downloads/ The Widget Effect. pdf Accessed 21 December 2010. Wra Weiner, B. (1985). An atributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review,92, 548-573 Weston. (2008). A study of junior secondary education in Indonesia: A review of the implementation of nine years universal basic education, Jakarta: Decentralized basic education three Project, as accessed on July 28, 2011 at: http://ddp-ext.worldbank.org/EdStats/ IDNdprep08.p Williams, K. C., & Williams, C. C. (2011). Five key ingredients for improving student motivation. Research in Higher Education Journal, 12, 1-23. Williams, T., & Kirst, M. (2006). School practices that matter. Leadership, 35(4), 8-10. Winardi, T. (2002). Motivasi dan Pemotivasian dalam Manajemen, Jakarta: PT. Raja Geafindo Persada. Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). Social cogmtive theory of organizational management. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 361-384 Woolfolk, A. E., Rosoff, B., & Hoy, W. K. (1990). Teachers' sense of efficacy and their beliefs about managing students, Teaching and Teacher Education, 6(2), 137-48. Wong, A.F.L., & Fraser, B.J. (1996). Environment-attitude associations in the chemistry laboratory classroom. Research in Science and Technological Education, 14(l), 91-102 Xu, X., & Mei, W. (2009). Educational policies and legislation in China . Hangzhou: Zhejiang University Press. Yin, R. K. (1981 ). The case study crisis: some answers. Administrative Science Quarterly, (26).58-65 . Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, London. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, London. Ylimaki, R. M., & Jacobsen, S. (2011). US and cross-national policies, practices and preparation, Springer, Dordrecht. Yukl, G. (1989). Managerial leadership: A review of theory and research. Journal of Management, 15(2), 251-289. Yukl, G. (1994). Leadership in organizations (3rd ed.) . New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Yuki, G. (2002). Leadership in organizations. (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall. Yukl, G. (2010). Leadership in organization (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Yuki, G. (2006). Leadership in organizations, 6Th Ed., New York. Yurdagul, G & Nukhet, D. R. (2016). A pathway to educational accountability: The relationship between effective school characteristics and student achievement. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4 . 2049 - 2054. doi: 10.13189/ujer.2016.040915. Zahru Akmal Darning. (2016). Dasar kerajaan dan sekuriti makanan di Malaysia, kajian analisis dokumen dan temubual. Tesis P.Hd. Universiti Utara Malaysia. Zepeda, S. (2007). Instructional Supervision: Applying tools and concepts (2nd Edn). Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education. Zepeda, S. J. (2006). High stakes supervision: We must do more. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 9 (1), 61-73. Zhao, R., & Kuo, Y. L. (2015). The role of self-discipline in predicting achievement for 10th Graders. International Journal of Intelligent Technologies and Applied Statistics, 8(1), 61-70, DOI: 10.6148/IJITAS.2015.0801.05. Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (2014). Comparing students' self-discipline and self-regulation measures and their prediction of academic achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39, 145-155. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-Efficacy: An Essential Motive to Learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82-91.

Sekolah menengah atas berprestasi tinggi dan rendah di Kota Makassar, Indonesia

Similar Items