Pelaksanaan kurikulum bahasa Aceh di Sekolah Menengah Pertama (SMP) berdasarkan model konteks, input, proses dan produk

This study was motivated by the fact that the results of the Acehnese language examination at State Junior High Schools (SMP) in Banda Aceh during the last five years (2010-2014) have shown a less satisfactory result. This study was conducted to achieve four objectives. First, the extent to which th...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Razali,
Format:	Thesis
Language:	eng eng eng
Published:	2017
Subjects:	LB2361 Curriculum
Online Access:	https://etd.uum.edu.my/6912/1/DepositPermission_s93071.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/6912/2/s93071_01.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/6912/3/s93071_02.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-uum-etd.6912
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection	UUM ETD
language	eng eng eng
advisor	Shaari, Abdull Sukor
topic	LB2361 Curriculum
spellingShingle	LB2361 Curriculum Razali, , Pelaksanaan kurikulum bahasa Aceh di Sekolah Menengah Pertama (SMP) berdasarkan model konteks, input, proses dan produk
description	This study was motivated by the fact that the results of the Acehnese language examination at State Junior High Schools (SMP) in Banda Aceh during the last five years (2010-2014) have shown a less satisfactory result. This study was conducted to achieve four objectives. First, the extent to which the local curriculum of Acehnese language at the schools can provide knowledge to the students. Second, what are the strengths and weaknesses of the course contents in the Acehnese Language as a local curriculum. Third, the extent to which the Acehnese language teaching and learning (T&L) process implemented in the junior high schools in Banda Aceh is in line with the local Aceh curriculum. The last objective is to understand the student achievement in the implementation of the local Aceh curriculum at State Junior High Schools in Banda Aceh City. This study was carried out using qualitative methods. Nine Acehnese language teachers from nine junior high schools in Banda Aceh City were selected as the source of data for this study. Data were obtained through interviews, observations, and document analysis. The results of the study showed that the Acehnese language curriculum was in line with the national curriculum based on its goals, objectives, and structure. Based on its implementation, it is found that this curriculum has its strengths and weaknesses. The strengths are that teachers have had over five years of teaching experience and have attended the curriculum workshop. The weakness is that there is no standard curriculum and there are still less reference books and learning support books for the subject. In addition, the results of the observation found that the Acehnese language curriculum was implemented using a good language learning method. Furthermore, the results of this study also found that the students whose mother tongue (first language) is Acehnese will have proficient in the Acehnese language in terms ofspeaking, reading, and writing as compared to those whose their first language are not Acehnese. The students were also found have skills in writing and reading other literary works. This study is expected to contribute to the theory of language assessment and development especially in Acehnese language curriculum
format	Thesis
qualification_name	Ph.D.
qualification_level	Doctorate
author	Razali, ,
author_facet	Razali, ,
author_sort	Razali, ,
title	Pelaksanaan kurikulum bahasa Aceh di Sekolah Menengah Pertama (SMP) berdasarkan model konteks, input, proses dan produk
title_short	Pelaksanaan kurikulum bahasa Aceh di Sekolah Menengah Pertama (SMP) berdasarkan model konteks, input, proses dan produk
title_full	Pelaksanaan kurikulum bahasa Aceh di Sekolah Menengah Pertama (SMP) berdasarkan model konteks, input, proses dan produk
title_fullStr	Pelaksanaan kurikulum bahasa Aceh di Sekolah Menengah Pertama (SMP) berdasarkan model konteks, input, proses dan produk
title_full_unstemmed	Pelaksanaan kurikulum bahasa Aceh di Sekolah Menengah Pertama (SMP) berdasarkan model konteks, input, proses dan produk
title_sort	pelaksanaan kurikulum bahasa aceh di sekolah menengah pertama (smp) berdasarkan model konteks, input, proses dan produk
granting_institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department	Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts & Sciences
publishDate	2017
url	https://etd.uum.edu.my/6912/1/DepositPermission_s93071.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/6912/2/s93071_01.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/6912/3/s93071_02.pdf
_version_	1747828127543853056
spelling	my-uum-etd.69122021-08-18T05:47:56Z Pelaksanaan kurikulum bahasa Aceh di Sekolah Menengah Pertama (SMP) berdasarkan model konteks, input, proses dan produk 2017 Razali, , Shaari, Abdull Sukor Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts & Sciences Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts and Sciences LB2361 Curriculum This study was motivated by the fact that the results of the Acehnese language examination at State Junior High Schools (SMP) in Banda Aceh during the last five years (2010-2014) have shown a less satisfactory result. This study was conducted to achieve four objectives. First, the extent to which the local curriculum of Acehnese language at the schools can provide knowledge to the students. Second, what are the strengths and weaknesses of the course contents in the Acehnese Language as a local curriculum. Third, the extent to which the Acehnese language teaching and learning (T&L) process implemented in the junior high schools in Banda Aceh is in line with the local Aceh curriculum. The last objective is to understand the student achievement in the implementation of the local Aceh curriculum at State Junior High Schools in Banda Aceh City. This study was carried out using qualitative methods. Nine Acehnese language teachers from nine junior high schools in Banda Aceh City were selected as the source of data for this study. Data were obtained through interviews, observations, and document analysis. The results of the study showed that the Acehnese language curriculum was in line with the national curriculum based on its goals, objectives, and structure. Based on its implementation, it is found that this curriculum has its strengths and weaknesses. The strengths are that teachers have had over five years of teaching experience and have attended the curriculum workshop. The weakness is that there is no standard curriculum and there are still less reference books and learning support books for the subject. In addition, the results of the observation found that the Acehnese language curriculum was implemented using a good language learning method. Furthermore, the results of this study also found that the students whose mother tongue (first language) is Acehnese will have proficient in the Acehnese language in terms ofspeaking, reading, and writing as compared to those whose their first language are not Acehnese. The students were also found have skills in writing and reading other literary works. This study is expected to contribute to the theory of language assessment and development especially in Acehnese language curriculum 2017 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/6912/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/6912/1/DepositPermission_s93071.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/6912/2/s93071_01.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/6912/3/s93071_02.pdf text eng public Ph.D. doctoral Universiti Utara Malaysia Abdul Raof & T. Subahan. (1990). Isu-isu latihan mengajar. Petaling Jaya: Fajar Bakti Sdn. Bhd. Abdul Rahim Hamdan. (2007). Pengajian kurikulum. Skudai Johor Darul Ta‟zim: Universiti Teknologi Melaysia. Abu Bakar Kasim. (1990). Panduan penyelidikan dalam sains sosial. Skudai: Universiti Teknologi Melaysia. Abu Bakar Nordin. (1986). Asas penilaian pendidikan. Petaling Jaya: Heinemann, Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. Abu Bakar Nordin. (1990). Kurikulum: Perspektif dan pelaksanaan. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbitan Pustaka Antara. Abu Bakar Nordin. (1992). Penilaian efektif. Kuala Lumpur: Masa Interprise. Abu Bakar Nordin & Ikhsan Othman. (2003). Falsafah pendidikan dan kurikulum. Kuala Lumpur: Quantum Books. Abu Hassan. (1998). Panduan penyelidikan dalam sains sosial. Skudai: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Ade Kusnandar. (2007). Panduan pengembangan multimedia pembelajaran. Jakarta: Depdiknas. Ahamad Rahim, Abdul Razak Ahmad, & Anuar Ahmad. (2009). Penilaian keberkesanan pelaksanaan kurikulum mata pelajaran Sejarah sekolah menengah rendah tingkatan 2 di sekolah-sekolah menengah Semenanjung Malaysia. Prosiding Seminar Penyelidikan Siswazah. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Al-Gayoni, Y.U. (2010, Juli 3). Memartabatkan bahasa Aceh. Koran Serambi Indonesia, Banda Aceh. Al-Qubbaj, K. (2003). The process of acculturation among Arabic children and their familes in the United States: Some educational considerations. (Unpublished Doctoral dissertations). New Mexico State University, New Mexico. Aminah, A., & Lee, M.N.N. (1994). Strategi-strategi pembelajaran dan pencapaian sains dalam alam dan manusia: Satu kajian kes di Pulau Pinang. Kertas kerja dibentangkan di The International Conference of Innovations in Educationan: Significance for teaching and learning: Pulau Pinang, Malaysia. Anna Kristina Abdullah. (1989). Kepercayaan guru terhadap peranan mereka dalam proses perkembangan kurikulum. Pulau Penang. (Disertasi doctoral tidak diterbitkan). Universiti Sains Malaysia Anthony, J.B. (2008). Teacher retention: Program evaluation of a beginning teacher and mentor program. (Unpublished Doctoral dissertations). Gardner Web University, North Corolina. Annells, M. (1997). Grounded theory metod: Part 1. Within the five moment of qualitative research. Nursing Inquiry, 4, 120-129. Atkinson, J.W. & Lidwin, G.H. (1969). Achievement motive and test anxity conceived as motive to avoid failure. Journal Abnormal, Social Psyckology 4, 52-63. Azmazaki. (2013). Implementasi kurikulum 2013 mata pelajaran bahasa Indonesia: Pola pikir, pendekatan ilmiah, teks (genre), dan penilaian otentik. Proceeding of the international seminar on language and art. Padang: FBS Universitas Negeri padang. Azhar Ahmad. (2006). Strategi pembelajaran pengaturan kendiri Pendidikan Islam dan penghayatan akhlak di kalangan pelajar Sekolah Menengah di Negeri Sarawak. (Unpublished Doctoral dissertations). Bangi: Fakulti Pendidikan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Azra, Azyamardi. (2002). Jaringan global dan lokal Islam nusantara. Cet.I, Bandung: Mizan. Azizah Hamzah. (2010). Kaedah kualitatif dalam penyelidikan sosiobudaya. Jurnal Pengajian Media Malaysia. 6(1) Azizi Jaafar. (2015). Penilaian pelaksanaan kurikulum pendidikan Islam sekolah menengah berasaskan model context-input-process-product (CIPP). (Disertasi doctoral tidak diterbitkan). Universiti Utara Malaysia. Azizi Yahya. (2001). Penggunaan model konteks, input, proses dan produk (KIPP) dalam penilaian program pembelajaran sejauh manakah ia relevan? Internasional Conference and Prospect in Teacher Education. Johor: Fakulti Pendidikan Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Azizi Yahya. (2007). Menguasai penyelidikan dalam pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: PTS Publications & Distributor Sdn. Bhd. Azizi Yahya, Fawziah Yahya, Zurihanmi Zakariyah & Noordin Yahaya. (2007) Pembangunan kendiri. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Skudai. Azizi Yahya. (2009). Penggunaan model konteks, input, proses dan produk (KIPP) dalam penilaian mata pelajaran Kemahiran Hidup di sekolah menengah di Malaysia. Journal Pendidikan. 6. (2). 27-38. Johor: Fakulti Pendidikan Unversiti Teknologi Malaysia. Babbie, E. (2004). The practice of social research (10th ed). Wesworth, United States: Thomson Learning, Inc. Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan. (2006). Panduan penyusunan kurikulum tingkat satuan pendidikan jenjang pendidikan dasar dan menengah. Jakarta: BSNP. Badruzzaman Ismail (ed.). (2002). Perkembangan pendidikan di Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam. Banda Aceh: Majlis Pendidikan Daerah. Baker, T. L. (1999). Doing social research. Singapore: Mc Graw-Hill. Berliner, D. C. (2005). Laboratory setting and the study of teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education. 4. (2). 36-37. Bhola, H. S. (1998). Program evaluation for program renewal: A study of the national literacy program in Namibia (NLPN). Studies in Education. 24. (4). 303-330. Bolin, F. S. (199). Teaching as a creaft: Teaching theory into practice. USA: Allyn and Bacon. Bishop, G. (1985). Curriculum development: A textbook for students. London: Macmillan Publisher Ltd. Bogdan, R. C. & Biklen, S. K. (2003). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods. 4th ed. United State of America: Group Inc. Borg, W.R. & Gall, M.D. (1983). Educational research: An introduction. Ed. Ke-4. New York: Longman In. Bramley, P. (1996). Evaluation of training effectiveness: Benchmarking your training activity against best practice. Ed ke-2. London: McGraw-Hill. Bryman, A. (2001). Social research method. New York: Oxford University Press. Budiman Sulaiman. (1986). Tatabahasa Aceh. Banda Aceh: Dinas Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Aceh. Budiman Sulaiman. (2000). Peulajaran bahasa Aceh. Banda Aceh: Dinas Pendidikan Provinsi Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam. Budi Sanjaya & Maimun Aqsha Lubis (2013). Penilaian pelaksanaan kurikulum tingkat satuan pendidikan (KTSP) berdasarkan Stake‟s countenance model bagi mata pelajaran bahasa Arab di madrasah aliyah CUPPI, Kota Jambi. International Journal of Islamic Thought. 4, 14-21. Carpenter, G. J. (1998). Program evaluation practices in wilderness for youth at risk. (Unpublished doctoral dissertations). University of Idaho. Cerino, L. (2009). A qualitative study of at risk seventh grade‟s perceptions of scond step: A social emotional learning program. (Unpublished doctoral dissertations). Walden University Minnesota. Chaiyot Ruangsuwan. (1986). An evaluation of the undergraduate educational technology program at Srikhariwirot University, Thailand. (Unpublished doctoral dissertations). Northern Illinois University. Chan Yuen Fook. (2003). Pendekatan penilaian: Satu tinjauan dari aspek kesesuaiannya dalam penilaian program latihan. Jurnal Pengurusan dan Kepimpinan Pendidikan Institut Aminuddin Baki 13(1): 65-81. Charil Marzuki. (1997). Kajian sekolah berkesan di Malaysia: Model lima faktor. (Disertasi doctoral tidak diterbitkan). Universiti Kabangsaan Malaysia. Charles, O. E. (2008). Enhanching the thinking skill of pre-service teacher: A case study of Komenda teacher training college.(Unpublished doctoral dissertations). Available from Proques Dissertations and Theses database. Cohen, L. & Manion, L. (1986). Research methoths in education. London: Croom Helm. Creemers, B.P.M. (1994). The effective classroom. London: Cassell. Creswell, J. W. (1985). Qualitative design inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3nd ed). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage. Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design, choosing among five traditions. California: SAGE Publications. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publication. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design quantitative and mixed methods approaches. (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage. Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational design quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publication. Inc. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Educational research, planning, inducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Edisi ke-2. New Jersey: Pearson Education. Cronbach, L. J. (1982). Designing of educational and social program. http://www.Education.Com/ reference/article/cronbach-Iee-Joseph. Akses (09 Ogos 2010). Curwood, M. R. (2004). Competency based training and assessment in work place. (Unpublished doctoral dissertations). Faculty of Education University of Melbourne. Denzim, N.K. (1998) The research art: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. 2 ad. New York: McGraw Hill. Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (1994). Kurikulum muatan lokal bahasa Aceh. Jakarta. Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2004). Manajemen peningkatan mutu berbasis sekolah, Buku 5, pembelajaran dan pengajaran kontekstual. Jakarta: Depdiknas. Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2006). Peraturan pemerintah Republik Indonesia nomor 19 tahun 2005 tentang standar nasional Indonesia. Jakarta: Depdiknas. Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2010). Laporan perkembangan kualitas lulusan sekolah di Provinsi Aceh. Naskah tidak dipublikasikan. Banda Aceh, Indonesia. Dinas Pendidikan Kota Banda Aceh. (2010). Kurikulum mutan lokal: Standar kompetensi dan kompetensi dasar mata pelajaran bBahasa Aceh. Banda Aceh: Dinas Pendidikan dan Olahraga Kota Banda Aceh. Eggemen, E. (2008). Perceived effectiveness of parent and teacher use of k-12 teacher web pages for enhancing communication in a Southern Rhode Island public school district. (Unpublished doctoral dissertations). Johnson & Wales University, Rhode Island. Ervin, A. M. (2005). The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs. New York: MacMillan. Faridah Hanum. (2011). Kurikulum muatan lokal: Standar kompetensi dan kompetensi dasar mata pelajaran bahasa Aceh. Banda Aceh: Dinas Pendidikan dan Olahraga, Pemerinrah Kota Banda Aceh. Fatimah Tambi. (2009). Penilaian pelaksanaan program pemulihan khas di sekolah sekolah rendah di negeri Selangor daripada perspektif guru besar dan guru pemulihan khas. (Disertasi doctoral tidak diterbitkan). Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Fatimah S. & Sam L.C. (2010). Analisis data kualitatif. Dalam Idris, N. (Eds), Penyelidikan dalam pendidikan (488-507). Kuala Lumpur: McGraw Hill Ecucation. Fauzan, A. (2002). Applying realistic mathematics educations in teaching geometry in Indonesia primary school. (Disertasi doctoral tidak diterbitkan). University of Twente, Enchede. Ferda Tunc. (2010). Evaluation of an English language teaching program at public university using CIPP model. (Unpublished Doctoral dissertations). Middle East Techinical University. Fowzia Osman. (1990). Penilaian program peralihan kemahiran hidup (Pilihan B) tingkatan satu di Wilayah Persekutuan. (Disertasi doctoral tidak diterbitkan). Universiti Kabangsaan Malaysia. Fox, C.M., & Jones, J.A. (1998). Uses of rasch modeling ini counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45 (1), 30-45. Fullan, M. (1991). The meaning of educational change. Teronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Educations. Gall, M. G., Gall, J. P. & Borg, W. B. (1998). Applying educational research. New York: Longman Publishing Group. Gay, L. R. (2000). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application. New York: Mc Millan Publishing Company. Gay, L. R. & Arasian P. (2003). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application. Ed ke-7. Upper Sadlle River, N. J.: Person Education. Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E. & Arasian. (2006). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application. Ed ke-8. Upper Sadlle River, N. J.: Person-Merrill Prentice Hall. Ghazali Yusri Abd. Rahman. (2012). Penilaian kemahiran lisan dalam kurikulum bahasa Arab di Universiti Teknologi Mara (UiTM). (Disertasi doctoral tidak diterbitkan). Fakulti Pendidikan. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi. Gibbs, G.R. (2002). Qualitative data analysis: Explorations with Nvivo. Buckingham: Open Yniversity Prass. Gredler, M. E. (1996). Program evaluation. Englewood Cliffs: Merrill. Gronlund & Linn. (1990). Measurement and evaluation in theaching. New York: The Macmillan Co. Hammond, L.R. (1971). Accountability through context evaluation of reading performances. Journal of Research and Development in Education 5. 31-36. Hamza, M.K. & Griffith, K.G. (2006). Fostering problem solving and creative thinking in the classroom: Cultivating a creative mind, National Forum of Applied Educational Research Electronic Journal, 19(3), 1-30. Hanson, J. L., Balmer, D. F., & Glardino, A. P. (2011). Qualitatif research methods for medical educatiors. Academic pediatrics, 11. 135—186. Hasan Alwi. (2008). Pelestarian Bahasa Daerah dalam Kongres Bahasa Indonesia VII. Jakarta: Depdikbud. Hatch, J. (2002). Doing qualitative research in educational settings. Albany, NY: SUNY Press. Hoyle, E. & Mc. Cormick, R. (1996). A level syllabus studies: History and physics. UK: MacMillan. Hunkins, F. (1980). Curriculum development: Program improvement. Colombia: Ohio Merrill. Hsieh, W. K. & Hsio, L. (2001). Evaluation of junior college of commerce: The Taiwan Case. International Conference on Engineering Education. 6-20 Ogos. Oslo, Norway. Ida Bagus Putrayasa. (2005). Profil pengajaran bahasa daerah (Bali) di SD, SLTP, dan SMU Kabupaten Buleleng. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran IKIP Negeri Singaraja. 38 (1) 869-884. Ismail Mohd. Rasyid. (2005). Penilaian pegawai pengkhidmatan pendidikan terhadap keberkesanan penggunaan KPM-Net. (Disertasi doctoral tidak diterbitkan). Universiti Putra Malaysia. Jamil Ahmad. (2002). Pemupukan budaya penyelidikan di kalangan guru sekolah: satu penilaian. (Disertasi doctoral tidak diterbitkan). Fakulti Pendidikan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Joseph, S. (2009). A comprehensive evaluation of a school system‟s grow your own principal preperation program. (Unpublished doctoral dissertations).The Geoge Washington University, District of Colombia. Judith C. (1993). Curriculum evaluation in nursing education: A review of the literature. Journal of advanced nursing. 19. 1024-1031. Kamaruddin Husin (2004). Dinamika sekolah dan bilik darjah. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications & Distributors. Kamaruddin Md Taher. (2010). Penilaian pembangunan kemahiran generik dalam kalangan pelajar tahun akhir Kolej Komuniti Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi Malaysia. (Disertasi doktoral tidak diterbitkan). Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Katz, L. & Raths. J. (1985). The best of attentions for education teacher. Journal Action In Teacher Education, 1. (3), 8-16. Kennedy, F. T. (1982). A comparison of evaluation practices in baccalaureate nursing program and the contex, input, process, product evaluation model. (Unpublished Doctoral dissertations). Northem Illinois University. Kerlinger, F. N. (1986. Fondations of behavioral research. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Ins. Khairuddin & Junaidi, Mahfud. (dkk.). (2007). Kurikulum tingkat satuan pendidikan: Konsep dan implementasinya di madrasah. Yogyakarta: Pilar Media. Kirk, S. (2007). Methodological and ethical issues in conducting qualitative research with children and young people: A literature review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 44. 150—160. Kirpatrick, D. L. (2006). Evaluating training program: The four levels. San Francisco: Berrete-Koether. Kuo, Hung Tsen. (2010). Using the context, input, process and product model to assess an engineering curriculum. World Transactions on Enginering and Technology Education. 8. (3). 256-261. Kokoszka, K. A. (2009). A case study approach to the perceptions of edline (TM), a K-12 technologi solution software, at a small catholic high school in southern massachusett. (Unpublished doctoral dissertations). Johnson & Wales University, Rhode Island. Le Compte, M. D., & Preissle, J. (1993). Etnography and qualitative design in educational research (2nd ed. London: Acadeic Press. Lincoln, Y. & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. New York: Sage. Lincoln, Y. S. (1995). In search of students, voises: Theory into practice, 34 (2). 88-93. Lyndon L.L. (2010). The development and testing of an evaluation model for special education. (Unpublished doctoral dissertations). The University of Texas at Austin. M. Nuh. (2013). Pelajaran bahasa daerah takkan dihapus. Tribunnews.com. Senin, 7 Januari 2013. Maliki & Soeserno, L. H. (2010). Evaluasi pelaksanaan kurikulum tingkat satuan pendidikan (KTSP): Suatu penelitian evaluasi berdasar stake‟s countenance model mengenai KTSP pada muatan lokal bahasa mandarin di SMA Muhammadiyah 2 Surabaya. Jurnal teknologi Pendidikan Universitas negeri Surabaya. 10. 38-48. Marsh, C. & Willis, G. (1995). Curriculum: Alternative approaches, ongoing issues. Enggewood chiffs. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc. Masri, S. (2003). Kaedah penyelidikan dan panduan penulisan research methods and writing guidelines. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan publication & Distributors. McDonald, J. P. (1986). Raising the teacher‟s voice and the ironic role of theory, Harvard Education Review, 56. (4). 355—378. McNamara, C. (1998). Basic guide to program evaluation. http:/www.mapn.org/library/ evaluation/fnl.htm (28.9.2004). Merriam, S. B. (1998). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. USA: Sage Publications. Marriam, S. B. (2001). Quaitative research and case study applications in education. San Fransisco: Jpssey-Bass Publishers. Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. 2nd Edition. Beverly Hills: Sage Publication. Mualler, M. J. (2000). Midle level summer school effectiveness as measured bay student gains in achievement and attitude. (Unpublished doctoral dissertations). Universiti of Nebraska, Nebraska. Muhajir, Neong. (2002). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Rake Sarasin. Mulyasa, E. (2006). Kurikulum yang disempurnakan. Bandung: Rosdakarya. Mulyasa, E. (2009). Menjadi guru profesional menciptakan pembelajaran yang kreatif dan menyenangkan. Bandung: Rosdakarya. Muhammad Daud Hamzah. (1993). Perkembangan kurikulum: Suatu panduan praktis. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Muhammad Daud Hamzah. (2000). Penerokaan teori kurikulum. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Muhammad Marzuki Arifin. (1992). Kurikulum bersepadu sekolah menengah: Suatu kajian pelaksanaannya di Sekolah Mengengah Sultan Azlan Shah Lenggong, Perak. (Tesis sarjana tidak diterbitkan). Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Malaya. Muhammad Nordin Abu Bakar. (2011). Penilaian program mata pelajaran vokasional (MPV) bagi bidang pertanian di sekolah menengah harian di Semenanjung Malaysia. (Disertasi doctoral tidak diterbitkan). Fakulti Pendidikan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi. Muhammad Subri Yahaya (1996). Pelaksanaan pengajaran tilawah al-Quran dalam pendidikan Islam kurikulum bersepadu sekolah menengah KBSM di MRSM: Satu kajian kes. (Disertasi doctoral tidak diterbitkan). Fakulti Pendidikan Universiti Malaya. Marohaini Mohd Yusoff. (2013). Penyelidikan kualitatif: Pengalaman pengalaman kerja lapangan kajian (Edisi Lima). Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya. Muhd. Salleh Lebar. (1996). Perkembangan dan haluan kurikulum pendidikan Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Berita Publishing Sdn. Bhd. Mohd Nasrudin Besar. (2004). Pelaksanaan kurikulum pengajian Melayu dalam kalangan pelajar tingkat empat. (Disertasi kedoktoran tidak diterbitkan). Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Malaya. Mohd. Zailani Mohd. Yusoff. (2008). Pertimbangan moral dalam kalangan pelajar sekolah menengah agama. (Tesis doktoral tidak diterbitkan), Universiti Sains Malaysia. Mohd Zainul Arifien. (2009). Penilaian dalam kurikulum bahasa Arab. Selangor: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Mohini Mohamed. (2009). Kajian penilaian kurikulum pendidikan matematik dan sains Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Jurnal Penyelidikan. 2 (2). 102--108. Moore, J. T. & Allen, F. E. (1992). The unheroic side of teachers leadership: Notes from the swamp. Phi Delta Kappa. 65-79. Morohaini Yusoff. (2001). Penyelidikan kualitatif: Pengalaman kerja lapangan kajian. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya. Nana Syaodih Sukmadinata. (1988). Prinsip dan landasan pengembangan kurikulum. Jakarta: P2LPTK. Nana Syaodih Sukmadinata. (2000). Pengembangan kurikulum: Teori dan praktik. Bandung: Rosda Karya. Nandi Warnandi. (2005). Implementasi pengembangan kurikulum muatan lokal pada sekolah luar biasa. (Makalah: Disajikan Jurusan Pendidikan Luar Biasa Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan IKIP Bandung). Bandung: IKIP Bandung. Napsiah Mahfoz. (1983). The role of key teacher in implementation of a new history curriculum in Malaysia: A study of perception. (Unpublished doctoral dissertations). Universiti Britis Colombia. Neves, D. (2006). A case study of student participation rate and parental decision variables in a new england suburban community before school elementary instrumental music program. (Unpublished doctoral dissertations). Johnson & Wales University. Rhode Island. Nor Hayati Fatmi Talib. (2012). Penilaian pelaksanaan kurikulum TITAS di Politeknik Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi Malaysia. (Disertasi doctoral tidak diterbitkan). Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi. Noor Shah Saad. (1992). Pendidikan guru matematik sekolah rendah: Persepsi guru lepasan dan pensyarah maktab perguruan dan guru besar. (Tesis sarjana pendidikan tidak diterbitkan). Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Nielsen, J. L. (2002). Critical success factors for implementing an ERP system in a university environment: A case study from the Australian HES. (Unpublished degee‟s dissertation). Griffith Uiniversity, South Brisbane. Nik Mohd Rahimi Nik Yusoff. (2004). Kemahiran mendengar bahasa Arab: Satu kajian di sekolah menengah kerajaan negeri. (Disertasi doctoral tidak diterbitkan). Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi. Nugroho Notosusanto. (1994). Bahan penatara dan referensi penataran UUD 1945, P-4, dan GBHN. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. Oemar Hamalik. (1992). Evaluasi kurikulum. Bandung: Rosda Karya. Oemar Hamalik. (2008). Kurikulum dan pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. Oliva, P. F. (2009). Developing the curriculum (7th ed.) Boton, MA: Allyn and Bacon. Omar Mohd Hashim. (1991). Pengisian misi pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Onyefulu, C. N. (2001). An evaluation study of the B. ed. business education programs in the university of technology, Jamaica. (Unpublished doctoral dissertations). Universiti of Alberta, Alberta. Oppenheim, A. N. (1997). Qualitative design, interviewing and attitude measurement. End. Baru. London: Printer Publicher Ltd. Ornstein, A. & Hunkin, F. P. (1998). Curriculum: Foundations, principles and issue. Boston, M.A.: Allyn and Bacon. Othman Lebar. (2007). Penyelidikan kualitatif: Pengenalan kepada teori dan method. Tanjong Malim. Othman Lebar. (2009). Penyelidikan kualitatif: Pengenalan kepada teori dan method. Penerbit Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris. Cetakan Ketiga. Parlett, M. & Hamilton, D. (1972). Evaluation as illumination in the tawny, D. (ed.). Curriculum evaluation today: Trends and implications. Macmillan. Parviz, B. & Mania, N. (2009). The qualitative program evaluation of the postgraduate english translation major ini Iran. The Journal of Modern Thoughts in Education. 4, (4). 37-58. Patton, M. C. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods.(2nd ed). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Edisi ke-3. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publication, Ins. Patton, M. Q. (2006). Qualitatif evaluation methods. Baverly Hills: Sage Publications. Petty, N. J., Thomson, O. P. & Stew, G. (2012). Reading for a paradigm shift. Part 2: Introducing qualitative research methodologies and methods. Manual Therapy, 17, 378-384. Punch, K. F. (2001). Introduction to social research qualitative and quantitative approaches. London: Sage. Provus, M. M. (1969). Discrepancy evaluation. Berkeley C. A.: McCtchan. Powell, A. B., Francisco, J.M. & Maher, C.A. (2003). An analyical model for studying the development of learners‟ mathematical ideas and reasoning using videotape data. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22. 405-435. Rahman, Muhammad. (2012). Kurikulum berkarakter: Refleksi dan proposal solusi terhadap KBK dan KTSP. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka Publisher. Razali Arof. (1990). Pengantar kurikulum. Kuala Lumpur: Percetakan Watan Sdn. Bhd. Razali Arof. (1991). Pengantar kurikulum. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Razali Cut Lani; Zaini Ali, & Abdullah Faridan (2000). Peulajaran basa Aceh keu siswa SLTP glah dua ngon glah lhee. Banda Aceh: Diknas Kota Banda Aceh. Reuben Musime. (1996). A critical evaluation of the religious education curriculum for secondary school student in Uganda. (Unpublished doctoral dissertations). University of North, Texas. Rene, W. & Austin, W. (2005) Teori kesusastraan. Jakarta: Gramedia. Rohana Yusuf. (2003). Penyelidikan sains sosial. Bentong: PTS Publications & Distributors Sdn. Bhd. Romi Setiawan. (2010). Pembelajaran bahasa Aceh sebagai mata pelajaran muatan lokal pada sekolah menengah pertama di Aceh Barat. (Thesis Magister Pendidikan, tidak diterbitkan). Banda Aceh: Universitas Syiah Kuala. Roselena Mansor. (2010). Penilaian pelaksanaan projek rintis standard pendidikan MARA. Jurnal Pendidikan Instutut Pendidikan dan Latihan MARA. 4 (1). 222-230. Rostina Taib. (2010). Basa Aceh Basa Geutanyoe. Harian Serambi Indonesia. Banda Aceh. Senin, 21 Februari 2010. Rozi, K. (2007). Sikap siswa SMU Negeri 5 Banda Aceh terhadap bahasa Indonesia dan bahasa daerah. (Studi kasus di SMU Negeri 5 Banda Aceh). Langgam Bahasa. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia dan Daerah I (1): 45-46. Rudzi Munap. (2003). Penilaian program diploma kesetiusahaan eksekutif di Universiti Tekonologi Mara. (Disertasi doctoral tidak diterbitkan). Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Kabangsaan Malaysia. Rusdi Sufi & Agus Budi Wibowo (2004). Budaya masyarakat Aceh. Banda Aceh: Badan Perpustakaan Provinsi Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam. Sabitha Marican. (2006). Penyelidikan sains sosial. Selangor: Edusystem Sdn Bhd. Saedah Siraj. (2001). Perkembangan kurikulum: Teori dan amalan. Sungai Buluh: Alam Pintar Erterprise. Salmah Yusuf. (2001). Pembelajaran bahasa Aceh di SMP Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Aceh. Laporan Penelitian. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. Saidiharjo. (2004). Pengembangan kurikulum dan prinsip-prinsip dalam pengembangannya. Yogyakarta: Suara Merdeka-IKIP Yogyakarta. Sayfol Bahry Sulaiman. (2011). Projek kajian tindakan. Open Universiti Malaysia: Meteor Doc. Sdn. Bhd. Saylor, J. G.; Alexander, W. M.; & Lewis A. J. (1981). Curriculum planning for better teaching and learning. New York. NY: Holt, Rinechert, & Winston. Schunk, D. H. (1991). Learning theories: An educational perspective. Teori pembelajaran: Suatu perspektif pendidikan. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co. Schuman, H. (1989). The random probe: A technique for evaluating the validity of closed question. Dalam. Glasne, C & Peshkin, A. (1992). Becoming qualitative researchers. New York: Longman. Scriven, M. (1981). The methodology of evaluation. In perspective of curriculum evaluation. AERA monograph series on evaluation. No. 1 Editor R. E. Stake. Chicago: Randy McNally. Scriven, M. (1993). The state of the evaluation. Workshop Presentation. American Educational Research. Atlanta Geogia. Sekaran, U. (1992). Research method for business: A skill-building approacd. Edisi ke- 2. Toronto: John Wiley & Sos, Inc. 248 Shabri. (2000). Kesusastraan kesenian Aceh. Banda Aceh: Balai Kajah Nitra NAD. Shapiee Lugom. (2002). Program pendidikan khas di Sarawak: Satu penilaian. (Disertasi doctoral tidak diterbitkan). Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Silverman, D. (2001). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analyzing talk, text and interaction. (2nd ed). London: Sage Publication. Slamet Lestari. (2012). Pengelolaan kurikulum muatan lokal (KML) bahasa Inggris SD Negeri se-Kecamatan Condokusuman Yogyakarta. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan. 2 (2). 66-73. Siti Fatimah & A. Halim Tamuri. (2010). Persepsi guru terhadap penggunaan bahan bantu mengajar berdasarkan teknologi multimedia dalam pengajaran j-QAF. Journal of Islamic and Arabic Education. 2(2).53-64 Smith, M. L. & Glass, G. V. (1987). Research and evaluation in education and social science. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Sowell, E.J. (2000). Curriculum. An integrative introduction (2 Ed). New Jersey, Colombus, Ohio: Merril an Imprint of Prentice Hall. Stake, R. E. (1975). The countenance of educational evaluation. Teacher College Record 68: 523-540. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage. Stufflebeam, D. L.; Folely, W. J.; Guba; E. G. Hammond R. L.; Merriman, H. O., & Provus, M. M. (1971). Educational evaluation and decision-making. Itasca, IL:F. E. Peacock. Stufflebeam, D. L. (1971). Educational evaluation and decision-making. Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock. Stufflebeam, D. L. (1977). Educational evaluation and decision-making. Bloomington Ind.: Phi Delta Kappa. Stufflebeam, D. L. & Shinkfild, A. J. (1985). Systematic evaluation: A self-instruction guide to theory and practice. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing. Stufflebeam, D. L. (2001). Educational checklist: practical tools for guiding and judging evaluations. American Journal of Evaluation. 22 (1), 9. Stufflebeam, D. L. (2002, June). CIPP evaluation model checklist. The evaluation Center. Available: http://www.wmiich.edu/evalctr/ checklist/chippchecklist.htm. Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation theory, models and aplications. San Francisco: Jossey A Wiley Imprint. Subhan. (2009, Mei 23). Perjalanan kurikulum nasional (pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah). Diambil dari htt://rbaryans.wordpress.com. Suchada Rattanasangwal Suthummaraksa. (1986). An evaluation of the doctoral program in development education at Srinkharrinwirot University of Thailand. (Unpublished doctoral dissertations). Illinois State University. Suhaila Mohd Nor. (2008). Kajian penilaian kurikulum pendidikan fizik dan kimia Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. (Disertasi doctoral tidak diterbitkan). Fakulti Pendidikan: Univerditi Teknologi Malaysia. Suminto A. Sayuti. (2003). Muatan lokal dalam penyelenggaraan pendidikan. Makalah Kongres Kebudayaan. Bukit Tinggi, Sumatera Barat: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. Su‟id, dkk. (2009, Oktober). Kurikulum integratif dengan pendekatan realistik pada pembelajaran tematik di sekolah dasar. Majalah Pendidikan Matematik Realistik Indonesia, 7 (4), 54-58. Sumerset, A. (2002). Strengthening quality in Indonesian‟s junior secondary school: An overview of issue and initiative. Jakarta: MOEC. Taba, H. (1962). Curriculum development: Theory and practice. New York: Harcourt, Barace. Jovanovich. Taylor, P. H.; Reid, W. A.; Holley, B. J.; & Exon, G. (1994). Purpose, power and constraints in the primmery school curriculum. London: Macmillan Education. Tyler, R. W. (1974). Basic principles of curriculum and intruction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. UNESCO. (2001). Educational planning: A world survey of problems and prospects. Paris: University Press. Vincent Pang. (2005). Curriculum evaluation: An aplication in a smart school curriculum implementation. Kota Kinabalu: Universiti Malaysia Sabah. (Tidak diterbitkan). Wegenke, G. L. (1994). Reflecting on systematic change in the Des Moines Public School. Studies in Educational Evaluation 20: 69-86. Wells, J. C. & Badwin, E. D. (2012). Historic Presservation, significance, and age value: A comparative phenomenology og historc charleston and the nearby newurbanist community of i‟on. Journal of environmental psychology, 32. 284-400. White, R. & Coventry, G. (2000). Evaluating community safety: A guide. Melbourne: departement of Justice, Victoria. Wildan. (2005). Tata bahasa aceh untuk madrasah dasar dan madrasah lanjutan. Banda Aceh: Geuci. Wildan, dkk. (2008). Peulajaran bahasa aceh keu murip glah VII SMP/MTs. Banda Aceh: Geuci. Wildan, dkk. (2010). Peulajaran bahasa aceh keu murip glah VIII SMP/MTs. Banda Aceh: Geuci. Wildan. (2010). Kaidah bahasa Aceh. Banda Aceh: Geuci. Woods, P. (2006). Qualitative research. Retrieved from htt://www.edu.plymouth.ac.uk/ resined/qualitative methods 202. Qualrsh m.htm. Yin, R. K. (1984). Case study research: Design and methods. Beverly Hills: CA Sage. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods.(4th ed). Los Angeles: Sage. Yus Rusyana. (1998). Survey pengajaran bahasa daerah si sekolah dasar dan sekolah lanjutan. Jakarta: Ford Foundation. Yusup Hasyim. (2000). Konsep dan perkembangan kurikulum dan intruksi. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Pub. and Dist. Sdn. Bhd. Zainal Arifin. (2002). Curriculum decision making in disffusion of educational innovation in Malaysia. (Unpublished doctoral dissertations), University of Southampton United Kingdom. Zaini Ali & Razali Cut Lani. (2001). Peulajaran basa Aceh jilid 4. Banda Aceh; Dinas Pendidikan Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam. Zawawi Ismail. (2008). Penilaian pelaksanaan kurikulum kemahiran bertutur bahasa Arab komunikasi di sekolah menengah kebangsaan agama. (Disertasi doctoral tidak diterbitkan). Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Zikmund, G. W. (2000). Business research methods. Ed. Ke-6. Ohio: South-Western Publishing. Zuber Hassan. (1998). Penilaian pelaksanaan kurikulum pendidikan jasmani dan kesihatan sekolah rendah. Laporan Penyelidikan. (Tidak diterbitkan). Universiti Malaya: Kuala Lumpur.

Pelaksanaan kurikulum bahasa Aceh di Sekolah Menengah Pertama (SMP) berdasarkan model konteks, input, proses dan produk

Similar Items