Conceptual design model for youth personal decision aid

Youth tend to face many areas of decision making with multiple choices. However, existing decision making tools are too complex and are not easily understood by the youth. Besides, complex and structured mathematical techniques are not preferred by the users as compared to direct and straightforward...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Norfiza, Ibrahim
Format:	Thesis
Language:	eng eng
Published:	2017
Subjects:	T58.6-58.62 Management information systems
Online Access:	https://etd.uum.edu.my/6985/1/s94054_01.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/6985/2/s94054_02.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-uum-etd.6985
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection	UUM ETD
language	eng eng
advisor	Shiratuddin, Norshuhada Sarif, Siti Mahfuzah
topic	T58.6-58.62 Management information systems
spellingShingle	T58.6-58.62 Management information systems Norfiza, Ibrahim Conceptual design model for youth personal decision aid
description	Youth tend to face many areas of decision making with multiple choices. However, existing decision making tools are too complex and are not easily understood by the youth. Besides, complex and structured mathematical techniques are not preferred by the users as compared to direct and straightforward design model. Additionally, theoretical foundation for decision making is not adequately considered in designing and developing decision aid technologies. Therefore, there is a need in considering and including relevant multi-criteria technique, model and theory in the development of personal decision aids. The main aim for this study is to construct a conceptual design model for Youth Personal Decision Aid (YouthPDA). The following objectives are outlined to support the major aim: i) to identify relevant decision making criteria, techniques, and theoretical foundations for YouthPDA, ii) to construct a conceptual design model for YouthPDA using the identified decision making techniques, criteria, and theoretical foundation, iii) to validate the conceptual design model of YouthPDA through expert review, and iv) to measure the correlation between usefulness dimensions of YouthPDA via prototyping. Design research is chosen as the approach and three main phases are adopted which are Problem Identification, Solution Design, and Evaluation. YouthPDA is developed as a personalised decision aid for youth to help them choose their study and career paths. By integrating data from the youth personality traits and multiple intelligences, YouthPDA functions as a recommender system that works on rule-based reasoning. The usefulness of YouthPDA is measured in the evaluation phase. Findings from 189 respondents show that the proposed YouthPDA is useful for youth as their decision making tool. Accuracy, Decision Strategy, Satisfaction, Knowledge Acquisition and Overall Usefulness are the dimensions being measured and correlated to put forward the conclusion. The selected multi-criteria, techniques and theories embedded into the validated conceptual design model are the main contributions of this study
format	Thesis
qualification_name	other
qualification_level	Doctorate
author	Norfiza, Ibrahim
author_facet	Norfiza, Ibrahim
author_sort	Norfiza, Ibrahim
title	Conceptual design model for youth personal decision aid
title_short	Conceptual design model for youth personal decision aid
title_full	Conceptual design model for youth personal decision aid
title_fullStr	Conceptual design model for youth personal decision aid
title_full_unstemmed	Conceptual design model for youth personal decision aid
title_sort	conceptual design model for youth personal decision aid
granting_institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department	Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts & Sciences
publishDate	2017
url	https://etd.uum.edu.my/6985/1/s94054_01.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/6985/2/s94054_02.pdf
_version_	1747828140920537088
spelling	my-uum-etd.69852021-05-10T08:04:36Z Conceptual design model for youth personal decision aid 2017 Norfiza, Ibrahim Shiratuddin, Norshuhada Sarif, Siti Mahfuzah Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts & Sciences Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts and Sciences T58.6-58.62 Management information systems Youth tend to face many areas of decision making with multiple choices. However, existing decision making tools are too complex and are not easily understood by the youth. Besides, complex and structured mathematical techniques are not preferred by the users as compared to direct and straightforward design model. Additionally, theoretical foundation for decision making is not adequately considered in designing and developing decision aid technologies. Therefore, there is a need in considering and including relevant multi-criteria technique, model and theory in the development of personal decision aids. The main aim for this study is to construct a conceptual design model for Youth Personal Decision Aid (YouthPDA). The following objectives are outlined to support the major aim: i) to identify relevant decision making criteria, techniques, and theoretical foundations for YouthPDA, ii) to construct a conceptual design model for YouthPDA using the identified decision making techniques, criteria, and theoretical foundation, iii) to validate the conceptual design model of YouthPDA through expert review, and iv) to measure the correlation between usefulness dimensions of YouthPDA via prototyping. Design research is chosen as the approach and three main phases are adopted which are Problem Identification, Solution Design, and Evaluation. YouthPDA is developed as a personalised decision aid for youth to help them choose their study and career paths. By integrating data from the youth personality traits and multiple intelligences, YouthPDA functions as a recommender system that works on rule-based reasoning. The usefulness of YouthPDA is measured in the evaluation phase. Findings from 189 respondents show that the proposed YouthPDA is useful for youth as their decision making tool. Accuracy, Decision Strategy, Satisfaction, Knowledge Acquisition and Overall Usefulness are the dimensions being measured and correlated to put forward the conclusion. The selected multi-criteria, techniques and theories embedded into the validated conceptual design model are the main contributions of this study 2017 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/6985/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/6985/1/s94054_01.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/6985/2/s94054_02.pdf text eng public other doctoral Universiti Utara Malaysia Abbas, A., Hoffmann, N., Howard, R., & Spetzler, C. (2007). Teaching decision skills to troubled teens. OR/MS Today, 34(4), 48-52. Abdullah, U., Sawar, M. J., & Ahmed, A. (2009). Design of a Rule Based System Using Structured Query Language. Paper presented at the Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing, 2009. DASC '09. Eighth IEEE International Conference on. Abraham, A. (2005). Rule-based Expert Systems, Handbook of Measuring System Design. John Wiley & Sons: 909-919. Adomavicius, G., & Tuzhilin, A. (2011). Context-Aware Recommender Systems. In F. Ricci, L. Rokach, B. Shapira & B. P. Kantor (Eds.), Recommender Systems Handbook (pp. 217-253). Boston, MA: Springer US. Agrawal, R., Rantzau, R., & Terzi, E. (2006). Context-sensitive ranking. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, Chicago, IL, USA. Ahmed, M. U ., Begum, S., & Funk, P. (2012). A hybrid case-based system in clinical diagnosis and treatment. 6IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics (BHI). 99-704. Al-Azab, F.G.M., & Ayu, M.A. (2010, December 13-14, 2010). Web Based Multi Criteria Decision Making Using AHP Method. Paper presented at the 2010 IEEE International Conference on Information and Communication Technology for the Muslim World (ICT4M), Jakarta, Indonesia. Alebrahim, A., Cote, I., Heisel, M., Choppy, C., & Hatebur, D. (2012). Designing architectures from problem descriptions by interactive model transformation. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, Trento, Italy. Alidrisi, M.M. (l 987). Use of Multi-attribute Utility Theory for Personal Decision Making. International Journal of System Science, 18(22), 2229-2237. doi:10.10l6/S0377-2217(96)00277-9 Andi, H. K. (2012). Emotional Intelligence and Personality Traits: A correlation study of MYElT and BFI. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences October 2012, Vol. 2, No. 10 ISSN: 2222-6990. Amott, D., & Pervan, G. (2008). Eight Key Issues for the Decision Support System Discipline. Journal Decision Support System, 657-672. Arsham, H. (2004). Decision Making: Overcoming Serious Indecisiveness. Retrieved February 4, 2013, from http://home.ubalt.edu/ntsbarsh/ opre640/partXJII.htm Atta, M., Ather, M., & Bano, M. (2013). Emotional Intelligence and Personality Traits among University Teachers: Relationship and Gender Differences. International Journal of Business and Social Science Vol. 4 No. 17 [Special Issue - December 2013] 253-259. Ayax System Inc. (2014). Let Simon Decide- Decision Made Easy. Retrieved December 2, 2014 from www.letsimondecide.com Bahari, M., Ali, N.M., Zain, A.M., & Nee, S.H. (2006). Pemilihan Produk Insurans Hayat dengan Menggunakan Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique (SMART). Paper presented at the Seminar Kebangsaan Sains Kuantitatif, Langkawi, Malaysia. Bahl, H. C., & Hunt, R. G. (1984, Summer). Decision-Making Theory and DSS Design. ACM SIGMIS Database Newsletter, 15(4), 10-14. doi:10.1145/1017726.1017728 Bailey, R. (2006). Physical Education and Sport in Schools: A Review of Benefits and Outcomes. Journal of School Health 76(8), 397-401. doi:10.1111/j.l746-l561.2006.00132.x Baker, D., Bridges, D., Hunter, R., Johnson, G., Krupa, J., Murphy, J., & Sorenson, K. (2002). Guidebook to Decision-Making Methods (Report No. WSRC-IM-2002-00002). Retrieved from Department of Energy, USA website: http://emiweb.inel.gov/Nissmg/Guidebook_2002. pdf Balnaves, M., & Caputi, P. (2007). Introduction to quantitative research methods: An investigate approach. London: Sage. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: a meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1-26. Barrington, E. (2004). Teaching to student diversity in higher education: How multiple intelligence theory can help. Teaching in Higher Education, 9(4), 421-434. Bartels, D. M., Christopher W. B., Fiery, A. C., David, A. P., & Peter, A. M. (2015), Moral Judgment and Decision Making. In Keren, G. & Wu, G. (Eds.) The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making. Chichester, UK: Wiley. Beach, L. R., & Mitchell, T. R. (1978). A Contingency Model for the Selection of Decision Strategies. The Academy of Management Review, 3(3), 439-449. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/257535 Bell, D. E., Raiffa, H., & Tversky, A. (1988). Decion Making: Descriptive, Normative and Presriptive Interactions. New York: Cambridge University Press. Benyon, D. & Murray, D. (1993). Applying user modeling to human-computer interaction design. Artificial Intelligence Review, 7(3), 199-225. doi: 10.1007/bfD0849555 Bettman, J. R., Johnson, E. J ., & Payne, J. W. (1991). Consumer decision making. Handbook of consumer behavior, 44(2), 50-84. Bhasin, Hitesh (Producer). (2010). Decision Theory and Human Behavior. UMASS AMHERST. Retrieved from http://www.umass.edu/preferen/ Game Theory for the Behavioral Sciences/ BORPublic/BORDecision Theory and HumanBehavior. pdf Bohanec, M. (2016). DEXi: A Program for Multi-Attribute Decision Making Version 5.02. Retrieved January 3, 2016 from http://kt.ijs.si/ MarkoBohanec/dexi.html Bosnjak, M., Galesic, M., & Tuten, T. (2007). Personality determinants of online shopping: Explaining online purchase intentions using a hierarchical approach. Journal of Business Research, 60(6), 597-605. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.06.008 Bronner, F. , & de Hoog, R. (1982). Non-expert Use of a Computerized Decision Aid. Analysing and Aiding Decision Processes, 281-299. Brown, R. (2008). Decision Aiding Research Needs Ensyclopedia of Decision Making and Decision Support Technologies (pp. 141-147). USA: IGI Global. Brown, B., Chalmers, M., Bell, M., Hall, M., MacColl, I., & Rudman, P. (2005). Sharing the square: Collaborative Leisure in the City Streets. In Gellersen, H., Schmidt, K., Beaudouin-Lafon, M. & Mackay, W. (Eds.), ECSCW 2005: Proceedings of the Ninth European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 18-22 September 2005, Paris, France (pp. 427-447). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. Buchanan, B. G. , & Shortliffe, E. H .. (1984). Rule-Based Expert Systems: The MYCIN Experiments of the Stanford Heuristic Programming Project: Addison Wesley, Reading, MA Buchanan, R. (1990). Myth and Maturity: Toward a New Order in the Decade of Design (Vol. 6): Cambridge: MIT Press Butler, K. A. , Hunt, A. J. , Muehleisen, J., Zhang, J., & Huffer, B. (2010). Ontology models for interaction design: case study of online support. Paper presented at the CHI '10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. Butt, Shahzad Ahmad, & Lavagno, Luciano. (2012). Designing parameterized signal processing ips for high level 5ynthesis in a model based design environment. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the eighth IEEE/ACM/IFIP international conference on Hardware/software codesign and system synthesis, Tampere, Finland. Bye, Dorothea., Pushkar, D., & Conway, M. (2007). Motivation, Interest, and Positive Affect in Traditional and Nontraditional Undergraduate Students. Adult Education, 57(2), 141-158. doi: 10.1177/0741713606294235 Calisir, F., & Calisir, F. (2004). The relation of interface usability characteristics, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of use to end-user satisfaction with enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 20(4), 505-515. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2003.10.004 Caroll, J., & Johnson, E. (1990). Decision Research: A Field Guide. London: Sage. Castro-Gutierrez, J., Landa-Silva, D., & Moreno-Perez, J. A. (2010). Improved Dynamic Lexicographic Ordering for Multi-Objective Optimisation. Paper presented at the Parallel Problem Solving from Nature - PPSN XI, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Chen, D.-N., Hu, P.J.-H., Kuo, Y.-R., & Liang, T.-P. (2010). A Web-based Personalized Recommendation System for Mobile Phone Selection: Design, Implementation and Evaluation. Expert System With Applications. Chen, P., Dhanasobhon, S., & Smith, M. (2008). All Reviews Are Not Created Equal: The Disaggregate Impact of Reviews on Sales on Amazon.com. Retrieved November 20, 2013, from http://ssm.com/abstract=918083 Choose IT. (2015). Consider Everything. Choose IT. Retrieved April 5, 2015 from http://chooseit.ie/public/index.php Chu, P.C., & Spires, E. E. (2003). Perceptions of Accuracy and Effort of Decision Strategies. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91 (2), 201-214. doi: 10.1016/S0749-5978(03)00056-6 Chua, Y. P. (2006). Research Method. Malaysia: McGraw-Hill Companies. Clemons, E., Gao, G., and Hitt, L. (2006). When Online Reviews Meet Hyperdifferentiation: A Study of the Craft Beer Industry. Journal of Management lmformation Systems, 23(2), 149-171. Coe, C. K. (l992). The MBTI: Potential Uses and Misuses in Personnel Administration. Public Personnel Management Public Personnel Management, 21(4), 511 -522. Commonwealth Youth Program. (2013). Commonwealth Youth Development Index. Retrieved November 12, 2013, from http://www.youthdevelopmentindex.org/views/ index.php#OVER Coyle, G. (2004). The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Dataland Software. (2009). Be Confidence with your Decisions. Decision Oven. Retrieved February 4, 2014, from http://www.decisionoven.com/ Demirci, G., Ayar, B., Kivrak, S., & Arslan, G. (2009). Contractor Selection in the Housing Sector Using the Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique. Paper presented at the International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate; CRIOCM 2009; 2672-2677, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong. Denning, Peter. (1997). How We Will Learn (R. M. M. Peter J. Denning Ed.). New York, USA: Copernicus. Digman, John. M. (1990). Personality Structure: Emergence of the Five-factor Model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41(1), 417-440. doi: DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.002221 Dillon, S. M . . (1998). Descriptive Decision Making: Comparing Theory with Practice. Paper presented at the 33rd Annual Conference, University of Aucland, New Zealand. Dix, A., Abowd, G., & Beale, R. (2004). Human Computer Interaction. 3rd Edition: Harlow: Pearson Prentice Hall. Doll, William J., Hendrickson, Anthony, & Deng, Xiaodong. (1998). Using Davis's Perceived Usefulness and Ease-of-use Instruments for Decision Making: A Confirmatory and Multigroup Invariance Analysis. Decision Sciences, 29(4), 839-869. doi: 10.1lll/j.1540-5915.1998.tb00879.x Douginator, T. (2007). The Popular Psychology Approach for Today: Cognitive Psychology. Retrieved November 12, 2012, from http://m.voices.yahoo.com/the-popular-psychology-approach-todaycognitive-294023.html Durand, M.A., Stiel, M., Boivin, J ., & Elwyn, G. (2008). Where is the theory? Evaluating the theoritical frameworks describede in decision support technologies. Patient Educ. Couns., 71(1), 125-135. Endsley, M. R., & Garland, D. J. (2000). Situation Awareness Analysis and Measurement. 408. Ferreira, M.,B. & Garcia-Marques, L. (2006). Automatic and Controlled Components of Judgement and Decision Making. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 91: 797-813. Fishburn, P. C. (l967). Additive Utilities with Incomplete Product Set: Applications to Priorities and Assignments. Operations Research. Folch-Lyon, E., & Trost, J. F. (1981). Conducting Focus Group Sessions. studfamiplan Studies in Family Planning, 12(12), 443-449. Foong, L. M., Shariffudin, R. S., & Mislan, N. (2012). Pattern and Relationship Between Multiple Intelligences, Personality Traits and Critical Thinking Skills Among High Achievers in Malaysia. 3rd International Conference on e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning IPEDR vol.27 (2012) © (2012) JACSIT Press, Singapore. Forman, E. H., & Gass, S. I. (2001). The Analytic Hierarchy Process - An Exposition. Operations Research, 49(no. 4), 469-486. Fulop, J. (2005). Introduction to Decision Making Methods. Paper presented at the BDEI-3 Workshop, Olympia, WA: The Evergreen State College. Galitz, W.O. (2007). The essential guide to user interface design an introduction to GUI design principles and techniques. from http://public.eblib.com/choice/publicfull record.aspx?p=29l460 Gangurde, S.R., & Akarte, M.M. (2011). Ranking of Product Design Alternatives using Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods. Paper presented at the Tenth International Conference on Operation and Quantitative Management (ICOQM-10), Nashik, India. Gardner, H. (1983; 1993; 2011). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York: Basic Books. Gati, I., Gadassi, R., & Shemesh, N. (2006). The Predictive Validity of a Computer Assisted Career Decision Making System: A Six Year Follow Up. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(2), 205-219. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2005.08.002 Germeijs, V., & De Boeck, P. (2003). Career Indecision: Three Factors From Decision Theory. Journal of Vocational Behavior 62(1), 11-25. Ghiabi, B. & Besharat, M. A. (2011). An investigation of the relationship between Personality dimensions and emotional intelligence. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 30 (416-420) doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.082 Girod, M., Elliot, A. C., Wright, I. C., & Bums, N. D. (2000a). Activities in collaborative concept selection processes for engineering design. Proceedings of the ASMEDETC2000 Conference on Design Theory and Methodology, Baltimore, MD,DETC2000/DTM-14548. Girod, M., Elliot, A. C., Wright, I. C., & Bums, N. D. (2000b). A Descriptive Model of Collaborative Concept Selection Process in Engineering Design. Proceedings of the International Conference on Concurrent Engineering: Advances in Concurrent Engineering, Lyon, France, 494-503. Goh, K. N. (2010). The development of a rule-based asthma system. International Symposium on Information Technology, 1104-1108. Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 2, 141-165. Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The Structure of Phenotypic Personality Traits. American Psychologist, 48(1), 26-34. doi: DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.48.l.26 Goodwin, P., & Wright, G. (2004). Decision Analysis for Management Judgement (3rd ed. ed.). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Gravetter, F. J., & Wallnau, L. B. (2014). Essentials of statistics for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning. Guitouni, Martel. (1997). Tentative guidelines to help choosing an appropriate MCDA. European Journal of Operational Research 109, 501-521. Habiba, U., & Asghar, S. (2009). A Survey on Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approaches. Paper presented at the International Conference on Emerging Technologies. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.): Upper Saddle River, N.J. Pearson Education, 2014 ©2014. Hammond, J. S., Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1999). Smart choices: A practical guide to making better decisions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press. Hansson, S. 0. (1994). Decision Theory. Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm. Harris, R. (2009). Introduction to Decision Making. Retrieved from Introduction to Decision Making website: www.virtualsalt.com/crebook5.htm Hatzilygeroudis, I., & Prentzas, J. (2004). Knowledge representation requirements for Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Paper presented at the Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Berlin: Springer-Verlag Berlin. Hayes, C., & Akhavi, F. (2008). Creating Effective Decision Aids for Complex Tasks .. Journal of Usability Studies, 3(4), 152-157. HealthLinkBC. (2012). Growth and Development, Ages 15 to 18 Years. April 23, 2013, http://www.healthlinkbc.ca/kb/content/special/ te7221.html Retrieved from Henry, C. (2003). Microfinance poverty assessment tool. Washington, D.C: World Bank. Hevner, A., & Park, J. (2004). Design Research in Information Systems Research .. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 28(1), 75-105. Holcomb, Z. C. (1998). Fundamentals of descriptive statistics. Los Angeles, CA: Pyrczak Pub. Hunch.com. (2013). Hunch- Personal Decision Making. Retrieved December 2, 2013 from www.hunch.com lsiklar, G., & Buyukozkan, G. (2007). Using a Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach to Evaluate. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 29, 265-274. Jiang, Z., & Benbasat, I. (2004). Virtual Product Experience: Effects of Visual and Functional Control of Products on Perceived Diagnosticity and Flow in Electronic Shopping. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21(3), 111-147. Jiang, Z., & Benbasat, I. (2007). Investigating the Influence of the Functional Mechanisms of Online Product Presentations. In.formation Systems Research, 18(4), 221-244. Johnson, J ., & Henderson, A. (2002). Conceptual models: Begin by designing what to design. Interactions, 9(1), 25-32. doi: 10.l145/503355.503366 Jungennann, H. (1980). Speculations about Decision Theoretic Aids for Personal Decision Making. Acta Psychologica, 45(1-3), 7-34. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(80)90019-0 Kahn Jr, C. E. (1994). Artificial intelligence in radiology: decision support systems. Radiographies, 14(4), 849-861. Kahraman, Cengiz. (2008). Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods and Fuzzy Set. Turkey: Springer. Kassin, S. M. (2003). Psychology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall. Keen, P. G. W., & Scott, M. M. S. (1978). Decision support 5ystems: An organizational perspective. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co. Kitzinger, J. (1995). Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 311(7000), 299-302. Kline, P. (2014). An Easy Guide to Factor Analysis. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis. Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2005). Marketing Management (12 ed.). Upper Saddle River: NJ: Prentice-Hall. Kroeger, Otto, & Thuesen, Janet M. (2013). Type talk the 16 personality types that determine how we live, love, and work. from http://search.ebscohost.com/1ogin.aspx?direct= true&scope=site&db=n1ebk&db=nlabk&AN=739894 Langton, N., & Robbins, S. P. (2007). Organizational behaviour concepts, controversies, applications. Toronto: Pearson Prentice Hall. Lee, G. H. (2008). Rule-based and case-based reasoning approach for internal audit of bank. Knowledge-Based Systems, 21(2), 140-147. doi: http://dx.doi.org/l0.1016/j.knosys.2007.04.001 Lee, J., Liu, K. F. R., and Chiang, W. (1999). A Fuzzy Petri Net-Based Expert System and Its Application to Damage Assessment of Bridges. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics- Part B: Cybernetics, Vol. 29, No. 3, June 1999 Leong, L. M., Nur Azrina, A., Herizal, H., & Anthea, M. (2012). The Youth Factor: 2012 Survey of Malaysian Youth Opinion. Retrieved January 30, 2013 from, https://asiafoundation.org/resources/pdfs/2012 NationalYouthSurvey.pdf Li, J ., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2009). Combine the Objective Features with the Subjective Feelings in Personal Multi-alternative Decision Making Model. Paper presented at the 2009 International Conference of Brain Informatics, Heidelberg. Lindeneg, K. (2009). Governance and Decision Making. 157-158. Linkov, I., Varghese, A., Jamil, S., Seager, T. P., Kiker, G. A., & Bridges, T. S. (2004). Multi-criteria decision analysis: Framework for applications in remedial planning for contaminated sites. Amsterdam, Netherland: Kluwer. Logical Decision. (2016). Logical Decision. Software for More Effective Decisions. Retrieved January 5, 2016 from http://www.logicaldecisionsshop.com/catalog/ Machin, M. A., & Sankey, K. S. (2008). Relationships between young drivers' personality characteristics, risk perceptions, and driving behaviour. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 40(2), 541-547. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2007.08.010 Manca, D., & Grana, R. (2010). Dynamic conceptual design of industrial processes. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 34(5), 656-667. doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2010.01.004 March, S., & Smith, G. (1995). Design and Natural Science Research on Information Technology. Decision Support Systems, 15, 251-266. doi: 10.1016/0167-9236(94)00041-2 McCrae, R.R., & Costa, P.T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81-90. McGuire, R. (2002). Decision Making. The Pharmaceutical Journal, 269(7222), 647-649. Mcleod, S. (2007). Cognitive Psychology. Retrieved September 7, 2012, from http://www.simplypsychology.org/cognitive.html Meghdari, A. (1996). Conceptual Design and Dynamics Modeling of a Dual-Arm Cam-Manipulator. ROBOTICA Int. Journal, 14(4), 301-309. Melville, P., & Sindhwani, V. (2010). Recommender System. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary? doi= l0.1.1.163.3573 doi: 10.1.1.163.3573 Montgomery, H. (1989). From cognition to action: The search for dominance in decision making: Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons. Morgan, D. L.. (1996). Focus Groups. Annual Review of Sociology, 22(1), 129-152. doi: doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.129 Mukherjee, A. (2009). Hunch: Online Personal Decision Making Tool. Retrieved November 12, 2012, from http://www.makeuseof.com/dir/hunch-onlinepersonal-decision-making-tools/ Munda, G. (1996). Cost-Benefit Analysis in Integrated Environmental Assessment: Some Methodological Issues. Ecological Aconomics, 19(2), 157-168. doi: 10.10l6/0921-8009(96)00048-1 Mzid, R., Mraidha, C., Babau, J. & Abid, M. (2012). Real-time design models to RTOS-specific models refinement verification. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Model Based Architecting and Construction of Embedded Systems, Innsbruck, Austria. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid= 243263l.2432636 Nardi, D. (2001). Multiple intelligences & personality type: Tools and strategies for developing human potential. Huntington Beach, Calif: Telos Publications. Negnevitsky, M. (2005). Art[fi,cial intelligence : a guide to intelligent systems. Harlow, England; New York: Addison-Wesley. Neisser, U. (2009). "cognitive psychology." Grolier Multimedia Encyclopedia 2009. Grolier Online. Retrieved from January 14, 2013 from: http://gme.grolier.com.ccnyproxyl.hbr.ccny. cuny.edu/cgibin/article?assetid=0066790-0 Nekooie, M. A., Mohamad, M. I., & Mahdinezhad, M. (2011). Application of MultiCriteria Decision Making (MCDM) in Lightweight Concrete for Floating House. Paper presented at the 1st Iranian Student Scientific Conference in Malaysia, University Putra Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Nguyen, H. P., Prasad, N. R., Dang, H. H., & Drake, J. T. (2001). Approach to combining case based reasoning wiith rule based reasoning for lung disease diagnosis. Proceedings Joint 9th, I.f.sa World Congress and 20th, NAFIPS International Conference, 2, 883-888 vol.882. Nielsen, J. (1992). Finding Umbility Problems Through Heuristic Evaluation. Paper presented at the ACM CHl'92 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Monterey, CA. Nielsen, J. (1997). Interface: The Use and Misuse of Focus Groups. IEEE SOFTWARE. 14(1), 94-97. Norfiza, I., Norshuhada, S., Siti Mahfuzah, S., Syamsul Bahrin, Z., Azizi, A.Z., & Haslina, M. (2013). Youth Personal Decision Aid (Youthpda): The Preferred Youth Decision Making Areas. Paper presented at the International Conference on Computing and Informatics (ICOCI), Sarawak. Norfiza, I., Ahmad Affandi, S., Siti Mahfuzah, S., Norshuhada, S., Haslina, M., Azizi, A.Z., & Syamsul Bahrin, Z. (2014). Integrating Multiple Intelligences and Personality Traits in a Dynamic Personal Decision Aid for Youth. Knowledge Management International Conference (KMICe) 2014, 12-15 August, Malaysia. ISBN: 978-983-2078-92-0, elSBN: 978-983-2078-93-7, pg:: 769-801 Norman, D. (1990). The Design of Everyday Things. New York. Norshuhada, S., & Shahizan, H. (2010). Design Research in So_fiware Development: Constructing, Linking Research Questions, Objective, Methods and Outcomes (U. U. Malaysia Ed.). Sintok: Universiti Utara Malaysia. Odom, M. D., & Pourjalali, H. (2011). Is Perception The Missing Link Between Personality Traits And Student Performance?. Review of Business Information Systems (RBIS), [S.l.], v. 1, n. 4, p. 67-80, Aug. 2011. ISSN 2157-9547. Retrieved February 15, 2013 from: <http://www.cluteinstitute.com/ojs/index.php/ RBIS/article/view/5511>. Date accessed: 12 june 2016. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.19030/rbis.vli4. 5511. Offermann, P., Levina, 0., Schonherr, M., & Bub, U. (2009). Outline of a Design Science Research process. Paper presented at the 4th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems Technology New York. Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2004). Compromise Solution by MCDM Methods: A Comparative Analysis of VJKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research 156, 445-455. Orr, R. K., Porter, D., & Hartman, D. (1995). Ultrasonography to Evaluate Adults for Appendicitis: Decision Making Based on Meta-analysis and Probabilistic Reasoning. Academic Emergency Medicine, 2(7), 644-650. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1995.tb03606.x Pandey, B .. , & Mishra, R. B. (2009). Knowledge and intelligent computing system in medicine. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 39(3), 215-230. Patton, M .. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Pavlou, P ., & Fygenson, M. (2006). Understanding and Predicting Electronic Commerce Adoption: An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior. MIS Quarterly, 30(1), 115-143. Pavlou, P., Liang, H., & Xue, Y. (2007). Uncertainty and Mitiga-ting Uncertainty in Online Exchange Relationships: A Principal- Agent Perspective. MIS Quarterly, 31(1), 105-131. Payne, J. W., & Bettman, J. R. (2002). Choice Selection. In Nadel, L. (Ed.). The Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science, 500. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M., & Chatterjee, S. (2008). A Design Science Research Methodology for Infonnation Systems Research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(3), 45-77. PersonalityPage. (2014). Common Careers for Personality Types. Retrieved January 12, 2014, from https://www.personalitypage.com/html/ careers.html Pett, M.A., Lackey, N. R., & Sullivan, J. J. (2003). Making sense of factor analysis: The use of factor analysis for instrument development in health care research. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Pub Pourjavad, E., & Shirouyehzad, H. (2011). A MCDM Approach for Prioritizing Production Lines: A Case Study. International Journal of Business and Management. Power, D.J. (2002). What is an example of a decision process? Retrieved February 18, 2012, from http://dssresources.com/faq/index.php? action=aartikel&id=20 Power, D.J. (2007, March 10, 2007). A Brief History of Decision Support Systems. Version 4.0. Retrieved April 12, 2012, from http://DSSResources.COM/history/dsshistory.htm1 Pluut, H., Cur~eua, P. L., & llieset, R. (2014). Social and study related stressors and resources among university entrants: Effects on well-being and academic performance, Learning and Individual Differences, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.11.018 Preece, J., Rogers, Y ., & Sharp, H. (2007). Interaction Design: Beyond humancomputer Interaction (2nd edition). England: John Wiley & Sons. Prentzas, J ., & Hatzilygeroudis, I. (2007). Categorizing approaches combining rulebased and case-based reasoning. Expert Systems, 24(2), 97-122. Pressman, R. S. (2010). Soft.vare Engineering: A Practitioner's Approach, 7/e: McGraw-Hill Higher Education. Reinhold, R. (2014). Career Choice and Career Development: Using the MBTI ® and Myers Briggs Personality Type. The MBTI, Personality Type and Career Choice - Career Planning. Retrieved from Personality Pathways website: http://www.personalitypathways.com/article/ career-plan.html Risjord, M., Moloney, M., & Dunbar, S. (2001). Methodological triangulation in nursing research. Philosophy of the Social Sciences. 31, 1, 40-59. Robinson, M. T. (2014). List of Personality Types and Matching Careers. Retrieved from Career Planner website: http://www.careerplanner.com/List-ofPersonality- Types-and-Careers.cfm Roscoe, J. T. () 975). Fundamental research statistics for the behavioural sciences. In R. a. W. Holt (Ed.), (2nd ed.). New York. Saaty, T. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York, NY, U.S.A.: McGrawHill. Salinesi, C., & Kornyshova, E. (2006). Choosing a Prioritization Method- Case of IS Security. Paper presented at the Forum Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAISE'06), Luxembourg. Salvy, Sarah-Jeanne., Roemmich, J. N ., & Bowker, J. C. . (2009). Effect of Peers and Friends on Youth Physical Activity and Motivation to be Physically Active. J. Pediatr. Psychol., 34(2), 217-225. doi: l0.1093/jpepsy/jsn071 First Sauian, M. S. (2010). MCDM: A Practical Approach in Making Meaningful Decisions. Paper presented at the Regional Conference on Statistical Sciences 2010 (RCSS 'l0), Shah Alam. Schiller, J., & Voisard, A. (2004). Location Based Services: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. Schmitt, C., Dengler, D., & Bauer, M. (2002). The MAUT Machine: An Adaptive Recommender System. Paper presented at the ABIS Workshop Adaptivit, Gem1any. Scott, W. A. (2002). Agile Modelling. Inclusive Modeling: User Centered Approaches for Agile Software Development. Retrieved November 20, 2013, from http://www.agilemodeling.com/essays/ inclusiveModels.htm#SimpleTools Sekaran, U. (1992). Research methods for business: a skill-building approach. New York: Wiley. Sekaran, U., (2000). Research method for business: A skill building approach, John Wiley and Sons, Inc. Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2010). Research methods for business : a skill-building approach. Chichester: Wiley. Shneidennan, Ben. (1998). Designing the user interface : strategies for effective human-computer-interaction. Reading, Mass: Addison Wesley Longman. Sieg, A., Mobasher, B., & Burke, R. (2007). Representing Context in Web Search with Ontological User Profiles. In Kokinov, B., Richardson, D. C., RothBerghofer, T. R. & Vieu, L. (Eds.), Modeling and Using Context: 6th International and Interdisciplinary Conference, CONTEXT 2007, Roskilde, Denmark, August 20-24, 2007. Proceedings (pp. 439-452). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Simon, H. (1996). The Sciences of Art(ficial (3rd edn ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Simon, H. A. (1965). Administrative behaviour: a study of decision-making process in administrative organisation. Collier-Macmillan: Free Press ;. Silver, H. F., Strong, R. W., & Perini, M. J. (2000). So each may learn: Integrating learning szyles and multiple intelligences. Alexandria, Va: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Sipahi, S., & Timor, M. (2010). The Analytic Hierarchy Process and Analytic Network Process: An Overview of Applications. Management Decision 775-808. Sipalan, J. (2013, October 12, 2013). Malaysian youths fourth most active Internet users, Malaymail Online. Retrieved from http://www.themalaymailonline.com/rnalaysia/ article/report-malaysianyouths-fourth-most- active-internet-users-globall y Sirigiri, P., Hota, H.S., & Shanna, L.K. (2015). Students Performance Evaluation using MCM Methods through Customized Software. International Journal of Computer Applications. 30(15), 11-14. Siti Mahfuzah, S. (2011). Conceptual Design Model of Computerized Personal Decision Aid (ComPDA). (Doctor of Philosophy), Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok. Siti Mahfuzah, S., & Norshuhada, S. (2010). Measuring Helpfulness of Personal Decision Aid Model. Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 10(5), 64-80. Tamrnet, T., Haav, H. M., Kadarpik, V., & Kaaramees, M. (2006). A rule-based approach to Web-based application development. 7th International Baltic Conference on Databases and Information Systems, 202-208. Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test on Competing Models. Information Systems Research, 6(2). Te'eni, D., Carey, J., & Zhang, P. (2006). Human-Computer Interaction: Developing Effective Organizational Information Systems: John Wiley and Sons Inc. The Myers & Briggs Foundation. (2014). My MBTI Personality Type (MBTI Basics). Retrieved May 18, 2014, from http://www.myersbriggs.org/ mymbti-personality-type/mbti-basics/. Tieger, P. D., & Barron-Tieger, B. (1992). Do what you are: Discover the perfect career for you through the secrets of personality type (5th ed.). B. Boston: Little, Brown. Todd, P., & Benbasat, I. (1991). An Experimental Investigation of the Impact of Computer Based Decision Aids on Decision Making Strategies. Information Systems Research, 2(2), 87-115. doi: 10.1287/isre.2.2.87 Todd, P., & Benbasat, I. (1992). The Use of Infonnation System in Decision Making: An Experimental Investigation of the Impact of Computer-based Decision Aids. MIS Quarterly, 16(3), 373-393. Todd, P ., & Benbasat, I. (1994). The influence of decision aids on choice strategies: An experimental analysis of the role cognitive effort. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 60(1), 36-74. doi: 10.1006/ohbd.1994.1074 Triantaphyllou, E., & Baig, K. (2005). The Impact of Aggregating Benefit and Cost Criteria in Four MCDA Methods. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 25(2), 213-226. Triantaphyllou, E., & Mann, S. H. (1995). Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process For Decision Making in Engineering Applications: Some Challenges. Inter'l Journal of Industrial Engineering: Applications and Practice, 2(1), 35-44. Tripathi, K. P. (2011). Decision Support System as a Tool for Making Better Decisions in the Organization. Indian Journal of Computer Science and Engineering (JJCSE), 112-117. Tsichritzis, D. (1997). The Dynamic of Innovation (R. M. M. Peter J. Denning Ed.). New York, USA: Copernicus. Tung, Y.-H., Tseng, S.-S., Weng, J.-F., Lee, T.-P., Liao, A. Y. H., & Tsai, W.-N .. (2010). A rule-based CBR approach for expert finding and problem diagnosis. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(3), 2427-2438. Turban, E. (1995). Decision support and expert systems: Management Support Systems (4th ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Turban, E., & Aronson, J.E. (1998). Support Systems and Intelligent Systems. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Ule, A. (2009). Collective Decision Making as the Actualization of Decision Potential. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems, 90-l05. Ullman, D. G. (2002). The Ideal Engineering Decision. Retrieved January 7, 2012, from http://www.robustdecisions.com/theideal enginsyste 1.pdf UNESCO. (2012). UNESCO: Acting with and for Youth. Retrieved January 18, 2013, from http://www.unesco.org/new/en/social-and-human sciences/themes/youth/ US EPA. (2013). Guidelines for Preparing Economic Analyses. Retrieved November 1, 2013, from http://yosemite.epa.gov/ee/epa/eed.nsf/ webpages/guidelines.html Vahdani, B., Alem-Tabriz, A., & Zandieh, M. (2009). Vendor Selection: An Enhanced Hybrid Fuzzy MCDM Model Journal of Industrial Engineering, 2, 31-39. Vaishnavi, V., & Kuechler, W. (2009). Design Research in Information Systems. Association for In.formation System. Valiris, G., Chytas, P., & Glykas, M. (2005). Making decisions using the balanced scorecard and the simple multi-attribute rating technique. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 6(3), 159 171. doi: 10.1108/14678040510636720 Velasquez, M., & Hester, T. (2013). An Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision making Methods. Internation Journal of Operations Research. 10(2), 56-66. Velmurugan, M. S., & Narayanasamy, K. (2008). Application of Decision Support System in E-commerce. Communications of the IBIMA, 5, 156-169. van Setten, M., Pokraev, S., & Koolwaaij, J. (2004). Context-Aware Recommendations in the Mobile Tourist Application COMPASS. In P. M. E. De Bra & W. Nejdl (Eds.), Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems: Third International Conference, AH 2004, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, August 23-26, 2004. Proceedings (pp. 235-244). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Wang, W., & Benbasat, I. (2009). Interactive decision aids for consumer decision making in E-commerce: The influence of perceived strategy restrictiveness. MIS Quart Manage Inf Syst MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 33(2), 293-320. Xu, D. J., Liao, S. S., & Li, Q. (2008). Combining empirical experimentation and modeling techniques: A design research approach for personalized mobile advertising applications. Decision Support Systems, 44(3), 710-724. doi: http://dx.doi.org/l0.1016/j.dss.2007.10.002 Yaniv, H. (2008). ThinkTeam: GOSS Methodology and Technology as a Collaborative Leaming Task. In F. Adam, Humpreys, P. (Ed.), Encyclopedia ofDecision Making and Decision Support Technologies (pp. 872-881). USA: IGI Global. Yin, R. K. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and Method (2 ed.): SAGE Publications, Inc. Zhang, M., Miao, J., & Luo, J. (2011). Research on Personalized Recommendation Technology for Tourism Industry- A Perspective of a System Framework Design. Advance Material Research, 1276-1280. Zheng, T., Wu, G.-H., & Ling, Q. (2010). Multi-objective Nonlinear Model Predictive Control: Lexicographic Method. In T. Zheng (Ed.), Model Predictive Control. Janeza Trdine 9,. 51000 Rijeka, Croatia: Sci yo. Zionts, S. (1990). MCDM: Where We Have Been and Where We Are Going? Paper presented at the International Conference on Operations Research and Management Science, Manila, Philippines. Zulkarnain, Z. (2001). Statistik Pengurusan. Sintok: Universiti Utara Malaysia.

Conceptual design model for youth personal decision aid

Similar Items